Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLog225 . , , ~e~age '. " Page 1 of2 ,. Michelle Farfan From: de Sa e Silva, Marco [MarcodeSaeSilva@DWT.COM] Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2004 10:30 AM To: Lund, Perry; Young, Tom (ATG); Stewart, Jeff R.; Toteff, Sally; AI Scalf; faith@lumsdeninc.com Cc: Michelle Farfan; David Alvarez; Greg McCarry; Mark Dorsey; Lyn Keenan; Ehlers, Paula Subject: Port Ludlow Associates LLC: November 18 Pre-application Conference Dear AI, Faith, Perry, Tom, Jeff, and Sally: Port Ludlow Associates LLC would like to discuss with the Department of Ecology and Jefferson County the option of using fill within a portion of the water body located within the Plat of Ludlow Bay Village in order to construct residential structures that the Department contends cannot be "constructed over water under JCSMP Section 5.160. This is a brief review ofthe applicable Jefferson County shoreline regulations regarding the filling of water bodies: 1. Definitions: A "landfill" is the creation of or addition to the surface of the land, land covered by water, or marsh, bog, swamp, or similar water detention areas by the placement of materials. JCSMP Section 5.100. The water body in question is land covered by water and a water detention area. The placement of fill material within the water body therefore is a landfill. 2. Landfills Within Water Bodies: Landfills within water bodies are expressly authorized under the Jefferson County Shoreline Master Program. The master program imposes certain development standards on landfills within "aquatic and wet land" areas. See JCSMP Section 5.100, page 65. The water body does not meet the definition of an "aquatic" area under the master program because it is not a "shoreline of the state." It is neither a shoreline (because it falls within the 20-acre lake exemption) nor a shoreline of statewide significance, notwithstanding the Department's determination that the water body is within the shorelands and subject to the residential over-water prohibition. See JCSMP Sections 2.8,2.95,2.96, and 2.97. And this water body also does not meet the definition of a "wet land" area, as the Department already has determined. See JCSMP Section 2.121. (If the final authority determines that the water body is an "aquatic" area, then PLA would be required to satisfy the "aquatic and wet land" performance standards rather than the less demanding "non-aquatic and non-wet land" performance standards before it is allowed to fill a portion of the water body.) 3. Prohibited Uses and Activities: "Landfills in estuaries, marshes, bogs, ponds, swamps, similar water retention areas, or other ecologically sensitive areas, except as provided in this Master Program, are prohibited uses and activities." Id. (emphasis supplied). This does not prohibit landfills within the water body for two reasons. First, the phrase "except as provided in this Master Program" means that if such landfills are permitted under the master program, then they are not prohibited. The performance standards on page 65 of the master program expressly authorize landfills within "aquatic and wet land" areas as well as "non-aquatic and non-wet land" areas. Landfills clearly are not prohibited within water bodies unless the applicant fails to satisfy the applicable performance standards. Second, the use of the word "other" in the phrase "or other ecologically sensitive areas" means that the prohibition applies only to ecologically sensitive areas (that is, ecologically sensitive estuaries, marshes, bogs, ponds, and so on) in any event. Otherwise, the word "other" has no meaning in the sentence. As is discussed below, under the only reported authority to have considered the issue, the water body is not an ecologically sensitive area. (Whether the water body is or is not an ecologically sensitive area has less importance when it is remembered that the prohibition provides "except as provided in this Master Program" and that the master program clearly authorizes landfills within "aquatic an(tt'tfrf'~As as long as certain #~~rJ 11/30/2004 Page~_L.....,.ot.~~~'. , . Message " r , Page 2 of2 performance standards are satisfied.) 4. Ecologically Sensitive Areas: The water body is not an ecologically sensitive area. In the case of Brennan v. Winningham, Wash. Shorelines Hearings Board Case No. 89-40 (1990), while interpreting the Kitsap County shoreline master program (which also uses but does not define the term "ecologically sensitive areas"), the Shorelines Hearings Board relied on the lack of evidence of actual environmental impacts and the fact that the area was not identified as an "environmentally sensitive area" by the county, holding that "an unusual or uncommon degree of ecological sensitivity is contemplated" and comparing "ecologically sensitive areas" with "environmentally sensitive areas." There is no evidence that the water body has an unusual or uncommon degree of ecological sensitivity, and as far as we know Jefferson County has not designated it an environmentally sensitive area. Under the only reported authority on this issue, it therefore is not an ecologically sensitive area. We look forward to discussing landfill and other alternatives with you tomorrow. Thank you for your consideration. Marco de Sa e Silva Davis Wright Tremaine LLP 2600 Century Square 1501 Fourth Avenue Seattle, Washington 98101 Tel: 206-628-7766 Fax: 206-628-7699 E-mail: marcodesaesilva@dwt.com LOG iTEM # ;)~ S Page,~ ~, of.~, 11/30/2004 . '\ ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ ;; ,;r t::l ~ . ~ !'!' I III: nq ~ ! ~ ! qn i ~ . . I ~ : I IE . I _ :. ---- ~ : : . I ,i : i ~ . . ~ : : ~ . I - !~q IIll PORT LUDLOW ASSOCIATES &mil ::-:;::.. E..;I.rIR.I.1 ~ ~ . ~ I" - ~ . ~ ' ,...... Way. WA -.ooa _ _ m:::: Id PORT LUDLOW RESORT PLAN REVISION .................. ~ Il!!l__ i _ ......... PUNO RLl. ALlERNA1I\IE _ =..En.J::"" I =--~.:-....... I =.:::'~ , , . J ~ g ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ OJ ~.,. ::s Ul . ~ I ~ II I ~ up pn - l~ I ~ I I' : PORT LUDLOW ASSOCIATES IiEBI ::.~:;: u.;.Y.I.1 \! ~ J J 1- ........ Wq-, WA 1800I = _ ::::= - I '! PORT LUDLOW RESORT PLAN REVISION .....-...m ~ ~ !!!iI_,_ ! > - I ~ _ ......... COUIIIY SLOPED Fll AL1ERNA1I\IE __ ~~C".... I =-s..;e I I =-~