HomeMy WebLinkAboutLog388
Page 1 of 1
AI Scalf
??5~
From: kaysins@wellsfargo.com
Sent: Monday, January 16, 2006 3:11 PM
To: AI Scalf
Cc: powers_therrien@yvn.com; kaysins@wellsfargo.com
Subject: Port Ludlow Resort Build out plan.
LOG ITEM
# 3M
Page----1- of;((
I am resending my response so it will be included in the records for tomorrow...
Susan Kaysinger
1M, Operations/Corporate Technology
Office (360)759-4822
Cell. (360)907-D677
"This message may contain confidentail and/or privileged information. If you are not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the
addressee, you must not use, copy, disclose or take any action based on this message or any information herein. If you have received this
message in error, please advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this message. Thank you for your cooperation. "
1/17/2006
LOO rrEM
#_ ~.BtO
Page~of~
OCTOBER 30, 2005
JEFFERSON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DIVISION
621 SHERIDAN STREET
PORT TOWNSEND, W A. 98368
Dear Mr. Scalf
We wish to make written comments in accordance with your Public Notice regarding the
Port Ludlow Resort Build-out and Marina Expansion.
Gary and I strongly oppose the density of the project. We believe it will not only
substantially lower the property value of our town home located at 46 Heron Rd., it will
place a significant strain on the existing infrastructure.
We believe you cannot build out over the pond, as that is a recognized wetland
supporting various forms of aquatic wildlife. As such, all buildings must be constructed
with a 30' set back from the shoreline of the pond. Ifthe 12' (condo) garage setbacks
from the road are complied with, the footprint for any buildings around the pond will be
substantially reduced, and will be more in keeping with what the plat can absorb.
It is also our position that you cannot replat the plat, without each and every owner's
permission. You may use the term "boundary line adjustment", but in fact it is a replat,
which will require every townhome owner to approve such a replat, a virtual
impossibility.
In addition, Heron Road does not meet the County minimum right away requirements as
stated in the conditions for the original development, thus it cannot support anywhere
near the proposed density not to mention the concern we have with the fact that our
garage does not have the correct setback from the road way creating a potential health
hazard. Earlier this year we experienced a near accident when we had a family member
visiting with a small child. The child ran directly into the road in front of the car and
barely missed being hit. This would have been a very tragic situation and in our opinion
very avoidable if the county would have ensured that PLA build the road setbacks to
code.
We have viewed three separate copies of the original plans signed and approved by the
county. None of these plans had an approved site plan signed off by the county even
though they were listed on the index. This, in retrospect is evident that the site plans
were intentionally not included and PLA intentionally built over the set backs with the
counties knowledge.
The proposed revision to the parking plan as it applies to the town homes and the Inn, is
inadequate as it does not allow for any guest parking or vendor parking, such as service
trucks working on various components of the town homes. Further, it would be a traffic
jam if more than one emergency vehicle needed to respond to the southern most town
homes.
We also wish to point out that for several years the County tax assessor has ruled that the
lots along the pond that extend out over the water are un-buildable, and has taxed them
accordingly As Port Ludlow Associates was aware of this and never attempted to refute
the assessors ruling, but paid the reduced amount of taxes, it is a tacit acknowledgement
and a validation of this ruling by the County assessor. They cannot pay lower taxes
because the County has deemed the lots are un-buildable, and then turn around and have
the County allow them to build on them. How can the County change their position so
easily at the whim ofPLA? If the County changes the tax position of these lots PLA
should be responsible for bring the taxes current for those lots. It has been our
experience when a county changes the actual taxation status of a lot that the back taxes
must be paid prior to any changes being made to the lot.
The failure of the developer to comply with the 51 conditions the county commissioners
imposed in 1991, the building of three buildings after the substantial shoreline permit had
long expired, the construction of one ofthe buildings within 30' of the Port Ludlow
harbor shoreline, and general non compliance with county regulations and codes is
evidence of a developer out of control who has and will continue to thumb their nose at
the county ordinances. PLA will complete the build out of Port Ludlow within the next
five years and leave. They are here purely for the profit and they are not taking into
consideration any long range plans that have already been developed to ensure that Port
Ludlow remains one of the pristine destination points on the peninsula and the Northwest.
It is our opinion that they need to be required to follow the codes established by the
county and state and the CDC needs to be the governing body that takes responsibility for
ensuring that those codes are enforced.
We also have other concerns that extend from the present build-out, as well as the fact the
County in 1993 previously denied the request for 90 residential units to be built in the
resort core. The basis for this denial was: density! Nothing has changed in the
intervening years that require an upward revision of the 58 units that were approved and
platted. On the other hand, in view of the fact they cannot build out over water, requires
a downward revision. This would be in keeping with the sanctions that should be
imposed by the County for flagrantly ignoring County codes and ordinances.
LOG ITEM
#_ 3~~
Page-1- ot.::L"~_
Sincerely,
Sue and Gary Kaysinger
46 Heron Rd.
Port Ludlow, W A.98365
437-8104
LO(, ITEM
:# ~~9; _"
Page, _ ~ _ofi.