HomeMy WebLinkAbout992600001 Drainage Report
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
DRAINAGE, EROSION, AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN
for
247 Franks Lane, Parcel No 992600001
Prepared for:
NORTHWESTE
TER IT..""7
Peabo
'....~---...._," ,,-.
D.EP1. OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
DRAINAGE, EROSION, AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN
Prepared For Seahome Services, Inc.
April 2006
For the Property Described as 247 Franks Lane, Tax # 992600001
Section 36, Township 21 North, Range 1 West, W.M.
Jefferson County, Washington
Prepared by
NORTHWESTERN TERRITORIES, INC.
717 S. Peabody Street
Port Angeles, Washington 98362
Phone 360-452-8491 Fax 360-452-8498
Web Site www.nti4u.com
E-mail info@nti4u.com
".' ,I.',
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
SEAHOME SERVICES, INC. PROJECT
247 FRANKS LANE
THORNDYKE VICINITY MAP
ft NORTHWESTERN TERRITORIES, INC.
fngineers - Land Surveyors - Geologists
Construction Inspection - Moleriols Testing
NT I 717 SOUTH PEABODY, PORT ANGELES, WASHINGTON 98362, (360) 452-8491
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
II
Drainage, Erosion, and Sediment Control Plan
for Seahome Services, Inc., Project Located at
247 Franks Lane, Tax # 992600001
247 Franks Lane Area Map
III
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Drainage, Erosion, and Sediment Control Plan
for Seaborne Services, Inc., Project Located at
247 Franks Lane, Tax # 992600001
247 Franks Lane Neighborhood Map
IV
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Drainage, Erosion, and Sediment Control Plan
for Seahome Services, Inc., Project Located at
247 Franks Lane, Tax # 992600001
Site Map of 247 Franks Lane
v
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
0
I
t "O-,Ol t~
I.
I~ '" lcD-ell 1
0 ~
I
(X) \
I~ (i\
'" ... ... '"
z '" '" '"
:;: D a "
u Cl. .., W
W '" :3
'" '" ~ ...
'" x '" W
'" x x >-<
x
'" '" >
'"
, 1\ z
-
- <[
I -!
N 0...
N ()
'"
'"
w
'"
z
ii1
...
'"
~
x
'"
'"
z
S
z
"
...J
"'W
z'"
_w
~ >-'"
"'u
_z
XD
WU
~~~w ~31 W'I H9lH A~~NlG~O
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
l- ..J ..J W ~
:g G: S ei ~
a.. w t;1 a (I)
I- I- W U
a.. ~ 2: ~
...0 ~ ~ M
X 8 z x
'" :;l
~
L:J
Z
>-<
I-
D
D
u...
l-
V)
D
0...
,,0 ,91:
,,0 ,Ot
)=
w
>-<
>
I '"
" ....
.. ..
l.J l.J
'" -'
.... '" .... u
'" .... l.J " "
I a '" '" l.J l.J
..., " Z .... ....
Q. 01 .. ..
.... .... l.J l.J
Q. .... '" '" '"
Q. .... ....
~ <Xl ~ '" ..
I x x x x x
.. <Xl .. '" OJ
I
I
I
I
I ,
I S
_/'V :3
rV -' w
-' I-<
I :; >
'" '"
....
.. :- W
l.J l.J
-' '" p
I u u
'" '" I-<
" .... " C/)
-' .... -' .. .. Z J:
<' '" <' l.J l.J .. ....
" '" ...J :;
'" Q. '" .... u '"
"
I " " " " " .. "
l.J l.J l.J l.J l.J l.J l.J
.... .... .... .... .... '" z
.. .. .. .. .. .... l.J
l.J l.J l.J W W ....
'" '" '" '" '" -' '"
.... .... .... .... .... -' ..
.. ...
'" .. .. '" ..
I x x x x W
x ....
OJ OJ OJ '" "
OJ Z
'"
z
I Q
z
..
...J
"'W
z""
I _w
....'"
"'u
_z
X"
wu
I
z
I 0
I-<
I--
U
w
I C/)
~
I-<
I <l:
I--
C/)
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Drainage, Erosion, and Sediment Control Plan
for Seabome Services, Inc., Project Located at
247 Franks Lane, Tax # 992600001
Erosion and Sediment Control Plan
Notes:
1. Install silt fencing along brow of slope (shown with dashed line above) below
any earth disturbing activities. Extend silt fencing 15 feet laterally beyond
limits of exposed soil. Maintain silt fencing until revegetation has occurred.
2. Install additional silt fencing just above the line of ordinary high water only
if work will expose soils on the slope above.
3. Route all runofTfrom roof drains to the tightline pipe to be routed down the
stairs per the drainage report.
4. Follow recommendations of the text of the Erosion and Sediment Control
Plan
ix
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
STANDARD TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN NOTES
The following notes are recommended as standard language for temporary erosion and sediment
control plans required under the Jefferson County Unified Development Code. The use of these notes
will facilitate the review and approval of these plans by the Jefferson County Public Works
Department.
. All erosion and sediment control Best Management Practices shall be selected, constructed, and
maintained in accordance with the Washington Department of Ecology Stonnwater
ManaQement Manual for Western Washimrton (current edition).
. The construction and maintenance of erosion and sediment control measures shall be the
responsibility of the contractor. The contractor shall not deviate from the approved plans without
prior approval from the Jefferson County Public Works Department. The contractor shall have a
set of approved plans on the site whenever construction is in progress.
. The erosion and sediment control measures depicted on this plan are minimum requirements to
meet anticipated site conditions. As conditions dictate during construction, the contractor shall
implement additional measures as necessary to ensure erosion and sediment controL
. Construction vehicle access shall be limited to one route, whenever possible. Quarry spalls or
crushed rock shall be applied to the access in order to prevent sediment from being transported
on to roads. If this should occur, roads shall be cleaned thoroughly by shoveling or sweeping.
. Clearing shall be phased so that only areas that are being worked are exposed. All exposed and
unworked soils shall be stabilized by appropriate Best Management Practices. From October I
through April 30, unworked soils shall not be left exposed for more than 2 days. From May I
through September 30, unworked soils shall not be left exposed for more than 7 days.
. All erosion and sediment control measures shall be maintained in a satisfactory condition until
such time as land disturbing activities are completed and the potential for onsite erosion has
passed.
. The contractor shall request inspection of temporary erosion and sediment control measures by
the Jefferson County Public Works Department [(360) 385-9160] as soon as practicable after
installation.
x
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
DRAINAGE, EROSION, AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN
for
PARCEL 976500009
ABSTRACT
This project consists of the construction of a beach access stair system and related
work on a 100 foot wide parcel at 247 Franks Lane, Quilcene, Washington. This plan
provides for the construction of a tightline pipe to convey stormwater runoff from the
existing improvements.
The pre-development runoff is not calculated since the system will discharge directly
to marine waters. The post-development runoff is estimated based on a standard 24
hour storm having mean recurrence intervals of25 years. Post-development runoff
is used to design the tightline stormwater pipe.
Construction phase erosion and sediment control measures are proposed to prevent
soil from leaving the site during construction of the improvements. A site plan
showing erosion control measures is included at the beginning of this report.
The following BMPs shall be implemented in addition to any that may later be
necessary due to changing or unforeseen site conditions.
1. Silt fencing shall be installed below the limits of any work which will
expose soil to the elements for more than 24 hours. The location of the silt
fencing is shown on the Erosion and Sediment Control Plan map included
at the beginning of this report.
2. Additional silt fencing shall be installed just above the line of ordinary
high water if any work will expose soils on the slope above the beach for
more than 24 hours.
3. Existing runoff from roof drains shall be routed to the tightline pipe to be
constructed down the beach access stair system per this plan. The stair
assembly shall include a six inch diameter tightline pipe to transport
storm water runoff from the uplands to discharge immediately above the
line of ordinary high water. The pipe shall be rigidly secured to the stair
assembly. The discharge point shall be at ground level into a basin of
quarry spalls for energy dissipation.
4. The recommendations of the text of the Erosion and Sediment Control
Plan shall be followed.
xi
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Drainage, Erosion, and Sediment Control Plan
for Seabome Services, Inc., Project Located at
247 Franks Lane, Tax It 992600001
CONTENTS
I. PROJECT OVERVIEW........................................................................1
A. Project Description......................................................................2
B. Existing Site Conditions.............................................................2
1. Topography................ ............ .............. ..................................2
2. Vegetation... ............................................. ...... .... ..... ... ... .........4
3. Drainage... ........................ ................. .... .......... .......................6
C. Adjacent Areas....... ............................. .............. ..........................7
II. DESIGN CRITERIA........................................................................... 7
A. Soils..... ........................ .................. ...... ......... ......... ....... ...... .........7
B. Rainfall.............. ...................................................... ........... .........9
C. Hydrologic Model....... .... .................. ........................ ....... ..... ... ..10
D. Time of Concentration..............................................................10
1. Predevelopment Condition..................................................11
2. Predevelopment Time ofConcentration.............................13
3. Post-development Condition...............................................13
III. RUNOFF ..........................................................................................13
A. Pre-development Runoff. ........................... ...... ..................... ... .13
B. Post-development Runoff.. ............ .... ........................................14
C. Mitigation. .... ................................................. .................. .... ......14
IV. EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN ...........................14
A. Site Specific Construction Phase BMPs..................................15
B. Stabilization and Sediment Trapping (Erosion and Sediment
Control Requirement Number 1)............................................15
1. Stabilization of Exposed Soils.............................................16
2. Sediment Trapping.............................................................. 18
C. Delineate Clearing and Easement Limits (Erosion and
Sediment Control Requirement Number 2)...........................20
D. Protection of Adjacent Properties (Erosion and Sediment
Control Requirement Number 3)............................................20
E. Timing and Stabilization of Sediment Trapping Measures
(Erosion and Sediment Control Requirement Number 4).....21
1. Timing ofInstallation ofBMPs..........................................21
2. Stabilization of slopes of structural BMPs.........................21
F. Cut and Fill Slopes (Erosion and Sediment Control
Requirement Number 5)......................................................21
xii
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
G. Controlling Off-Site Erosion {Erosion and Sediment Control
Requirement Number 6)................... ... .................. ................ .22
H. Stabilization of Temporary Channels and Outlets {Erosion
and Sediment Control Requirement Number 7)....................22
I. Underground Utility Construction {Erosion and Sediment
Control Requirement Number 9)............................................22
J. Construction Access Routes {Erosion and Sediment Control
Requirement Number 10)...... ........................................ ..... ....23
K. Removal of Temporary BMPs {Erosion and Sediment Control
Requirement Number 11).................... .......... .......... ...............24
L. Dewatering Construction Sites {Erosion and Sediment
Control Requirement Number 12)..........................................24
M. Control of Pollutants Other than Sediment {Erosion and
Sediment Control Requirement Number 13).........................24
1. Control of Toxic Substances................................................25
2. Petroleum Spills........ ...................... ................. ....... ...... ......25
N. Maintenance {Erosion and Sediment Control Requirement
Number 14).................................................................. ............26
O. Financial Responsibility.............................. .......... ........ .... .......27
xiii
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Drainage, Erosion, and Sediment Control Plan
for Seabome Services, Inc., Project Located at
247 Franks Lane, Tax # 992600001
Photo 1
I. PROJECT OVERVIEW
This project consists of the construction of a beach access stair system and related
work on a single parcel at 247 Franks Lane, Quilcene, Washington. This plan also
provides for the construction of a tightline pipe to convey stonnwater runoff from the
existing roof drains. Photo 1 front of the home which is located on the eastern end of
the parcel. The existing layout of the site is shown on the site map included at the
beginning of this report. A geotechnical report for the site was prepared by this office
and provides additional infonnation about the site.
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
A. Project Description
This project consists of the construction of a beach access stair system. The
drainage, sediment and erosion control features of the plan are directed toward
the stair system but they also provide for conveyance of roof water from existing
structures on the site.
B. Existing Site Conditions
The following summary of site conditions represents existing conditions.
1. Tbpography
The site is somewhat long and narrow with the axis oriented east and west as
shown on the Area, Neighborhood, and Site Maps included at the beginning
of this report. The geotechnical report prepared by this office discusses the
topography in more detail. The ground generally slopes to the east, toward
the beach.
FiI!11re 1
Figure 1 is an excerpt from the USGS Topo map of the area. Note the gentle
and uniform slope to the east.
2
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Photo 2
Photo 2 shows the general area of 247 Franks Lane, which is indicated by the
arrow in the photo. The gently sloping ground shown in Photo 2 tenninates
abruptly at the moderately high coastal bluff shown in Photo 3.
Photo 3
Access to the bottom of the bluff is provided by an existing set of stairs. These
stairs are shown in Photos 3 and 4. These stairs will be replaced per this
project.
3
.
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
.
I
I
I
I
I
.
.
.
'.
Photo 4
2. Vegetation
The westernmost portion of the site is heavily vegetated with natural
vegetation as shown on the neighborhood map included at the beginning of
this report. The uplands portion immediately adjacent to the top of the bluff
is covered with healthy lawn and landscaping as shown in Photo 5.
Photo 5
4
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Vegetation on the face of the bluff is a mix of natural vegetation and ivy as
shown in Photo 6.
Photo 6
The vegetation extends to the line of ordinary high water as seen in Photo 7.
Photo 7
,
5
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
3. Drainage
The site presently drains easterly down the uplands slope and over the bluff.
Most of the flow from the areas above the developed portion of the parcel goes
through an 18 inch diameter culvert which dumps over the bluff on the south
side of the existing house. This culvert is obscured by very heavy brush but
can be seen in the background of Photo 8. Tk
\h, r c..\lL~ac- r...s. LOG~d 0"';
A() da..1?'E'"
ptGpr.~T~
Photo 8
Flows from this culvert have eroded the bluff back but the area below (See
Photo 9) has become stabilized and further erosion appears to have been
stopped. Thi.s 0 -07 0"'" 711.0 itA .k.e;zE.'iT frqf'C-t"y
Photo 9
6
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Roof runoff apparently goes over the bluff via the smaller diameter pipes
shown in Photo 10. These pipes have failed and erosion of the bluff below has
resulted.
Photo 10
Drainage across the lawn and landscaped portions of the lower portion of the
uplands is primarily by sheet flow which flows down the bluff.
C. Adjacent Areas .
The site is surrounded by rural residential lands on the north and south sides.
Thorndyke Road, a County road, lies on the west side of the parcel. Hood Canal
fonns the eastern side of the parcel. The maps included at the beginning of this
report show good overviews of the neighborhood.
II. DESIGN CRITERIA
The following criteria are specific to this project site and will not apply to other
properties, even those that may be nearby.
A. Soils
The site may be found on map number 62 of the Soil Survev of Jefferson Countv
Area, published by the U. S. Soil Conservation Service, a portion of which is
reproduced here as Figure 2.
7
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Figure 2
Figure 2 can be compared with the Area Maps at the beginning of this report for
orientation.
Map number 62 predicts that the soils on this site are type cre, Cassolary sandy
loam on slopes ranging between 0 and 15 percent.
The Soil Survev of Jefferson Countv Area describes Cassolary sandy loam as
being well drained soils on uplands formed of reworked glacial and marine
sediments. The well drained descriptor may not agree well with the soils on the
lower, developed part of the parcel, near the bluff where permeability appears to
be less rapid.
Cassolary soils belong to hydrologic group C, which is only a moderately well
drained classification and which agrees with the findings of the field
! I
8
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
investigation. This report assumes that the soils are Cassolary soils. Additional
discussion of the soils can be found in the geotechnical report.
B. Rainfall
The total amount of precipitation falling over a 24 hour period during a stonn
having a mean recurrence interval of 2 years, will be 2.8 inches. This
information was taken from a 2 year, 24 hour Isopluvial Map published by the
U.S. Soil Conservation Service, a portion of which is reproduced here as Figure 3.
The project location is marked on the map.
26N
A
",
~ 15:!0
"
\
\
--.....,
\ \
lW
ISOPLUVIAlS OF 2-YEAR 24-HOUR
PRECIPiTATION IN TENTHS OF AN INCH
Figure 3
The isopluviallines represent total precipitation in 24 hours, in tenths of inches.
2 year rainfall data is used in the calculation of times of concentration for the
site.
The total amount of precipitation falling over a 24 hour period during a stonn
having a mean recurrence interval of 25 years, will be 5.0 inches. This
information was taken from a 25 year, 24 hour Isopluvial Map published by the
U.S. Soil Conservation Service, a portion of which is reproduced here as Figure 4.
The project location is marked on the map.
9
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
61)
J1N 6S~'""
~
50t5 4,0 ~5
\
. 2~
.1,O\.
20
,
26M
\.;,
JON llO~ }'-"\ ,\ \~
Of:,. \ --..... .
29N'~' ,
'"----.........
\.
....20
...
\.
,
"!"l
27N
\ 10 ^' ->.r- \j l
,C'"1101Xt "\ "
-" ---. j (i4d--, \ 90' 85 .
I - L/') I.... ,\ ,
\
\65
'70
lOW
9W
BW 7W 6W 5W 4W
IW
fSOPLUVIALS OF 25-YEAR 24-HOUR
PRECIPITATION IN TENTHS or AN INcH
Figure 4
The rainfall distribution is assumed to be a Type IA distribution per standard
practice in the area.
C. Hydrologic Model
Because hydrologic and hydraulic calculations are only performed for the
purpose of sizing the tightline pipe system, there is no need for a continuous
hydrologic simulation. Only the peak flow is needed.
This plan uses a hydrograph based method of calculating runoff which is
described in Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds, Technical Release No. 55,
and the Western Washington Supplement to Technical Release No. 55, both
published by the U. S. Soil Conservation Service. This same type of method is
given in the King County Surface Water Design Manual, published by the King
County Public Works Department, and the 1992 Stormwater Management
Manual for the Puget Sound Basin (The Technical Manual) published by the
Washington State Department of Ecology.
This method yields runoff volumes that are significantly different from those
determined using the rational method.
This plan uses the suggested runoff curve numbers given in Table 2-2a of
Technical Release No. 55.
D. Time of Concentration
The length of time that it takes a drop of rainfall to travel from the uppermost
point of a basin to the point of discharge from the basin, or to the point where
10
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
flows are to be calculated, is referred to as the time of concentration (Tc). This is
the sum of the time it takes for runoff to flow across the various types of flow
channels as it crosses the basin.
Since most flow from the upper, wooded portions of the parcel are routed to the
beach via the culvert shown in Photo 8, these predevelopment calculations
assume that the basin begins at the upper portion of the lawnllandscaped portion
and end at the top of the bluff.
The following calculations are per Section 1II-1.4.2, pages III-I-I3 through III-I-
16, of the Washington State Department of Ecology's STORMWATER
MANAGEMENT MANUAL FOR THE PUGET SOUND BASIN. THE
TECHNICAL MANUAL, (DOE).
1. Predevelopment Condition
The time of concentration is first determined for the existing condition of the
basin.
a. Unconcentrated Flow
Immediately after falling to the ground, rainwater initially travels as
unconcentrated sheet flow for a period of time (Tt) calculated by:
0.80
0.42 (NsL)
Tt = -------------------- = 5.49 min
0.527 0.4
(P2) (SO)
Where:
Ns = 0.240
P2 = 2.8
SO = 0.0500
L= 50
= Sheet flow Manning's n (DOE Table III-I.4)
= 2 yr, 24 hr rainfall (in)
= Slope of flow path (ft/ft)
= Length (L) of flow path (ft)
11
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
b. Shallow Concentrated Flow
As sheet flows run together and become concentrated, they travel as
shallow concentrated flow for a period of time (Tt) calculated by:
L
Tt = -------------------- = 0.54 min
60 Ks SQRT(SO)
Where: Ks = 11
SO = 0.0800
L = 100
= Velocity factor (Ks) (per DOE Table I1I-1.4)
= Slope of flow path (ftlft)
= Length (L) of flow path (ft)
c. Open Channel (Intermittent) Flow
Flows next travel through intermittent open channels for a period of time
(Tt) calculated by:
L
Tt = . - . - . - . - . - . = 0.35 min
60 Kc SQRT(SO)
Where: Kc = 17
SO = 0.0800
L = 100
= Velocity factor (Kc) (DOE Table I1I-1.4)
= Slope of flow path (ft/ft)
= Length (L) offlow path (ft)
12
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
2. Predevelopment Time of Concentration
As noted above, the time of concentration (Tcl is the sum of the time it takes
for runoff to flow across the various types of flow channels as it crosses the
basin. For the predevelopment condition:
Tc = the sum of the various Tt's = 6.37 min
This is rounded to 6 min for use in further calculations.
3. Post-development Condition
The time of concentration is next determined for the proposed, post-developed
condition of the basin. There is little change in time of concentration from the
predeveloped to the postdeveloped condition since most changes in land use
will occur in areas where flows are already relatively rapid, allowing little
opportunity for the increased flow velocities that will reduce the time of
concentration.
Because of these conditions, the postdevelopment time of concentration is
assumed to be the same as the predevelopment time of concentration.
III. RUNOFF
These calculations are based on runoff from roofs having an assumed aggregate
surface area of 5,000 square feet.
While not necessary for the purposes of this report, pre-development runoff was
calculated for the site. These values are reported but calculations are not included.
Full calculations for post-development flow at the 25 year level are included in
Appendix I.
A. Pre-development Runoff
A catalog of assumed pre-development conditions and calculations of the pre-
development, weighted runoff curve numbers is included in Appendix I. These
are the conditions that were assumed to prevail before development of the site.
Under these conditions, the site has a weighted runoff curve number of 81.
Complete calculations of the pre-development runoff are contained in Appendix I.
The pre-development runoff is calculated to be 0.0895 cfs for the 25-year storm.
13
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
B. Post-development Runoff
A catalog of assumed post-development conditions and calculations of the post-
development, weighted runoff curve numbers is also included in Appendix 1.
These are the conditions that will prevail after development of the site.
Under these conditions, the site will have a weighted runoff curve number of 98.
Complete calculations of the post-development runoff are contained in Appendix
1. The post-development runoff is calculated to be 0.0.145 cfs for the 25-year
storms, an increase from the predevelopment rate.
C. Mitigation
Construction phase erosion and sediment control measures are proposed to
prevent soil from leaving the site during construction of the improvements. A
site map for erosion control measures is included at the beginning of this report.
To mitigate increased levels of runoff from the future full development of this
parcel, and to provide a higher level of protection against erosion of the marine
slope, existing runoff from roof drains shall be routed to the tightline pipe to be
constructed down the beach access stair system per this plan. Runoff from future
structures shall also be routed to the same tightline pipe down the beach access
stair system.
Design (sizing) calculations, including flood routing calculations, are included in
Appendix 1. The stair assembly shall include a six inch diameter tightline pipe to
transport stormwater runoff from the uplands to discharge immediately above
the line of ordinary high water. The pipe shall be rigidly secured to the stair
assembly. The discharge point shall be at ground level into a basin of quarry
spalls for energy dissipation.
To mitigate potential erosion and sediment impacts, the requirements of the
erosion and sediment control plan shall be followed. Site specific mitigation
measures are listed near the beginning of the erosion and sediment control plan.
General guidelines and recommendations are in following sections.
IV. EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN
This portion of the plan was prepared with the goal of preventing damage to
adjoining or downstream properties due to erosion and sediment deposition and
preventing the degradation of the quality of the receiving waters during the
construction phase of this project.
To ensure that the provisions of this Erosion and Sediment Control Plan are
followed during construction, the complete text of this Erosion and Sediment Control
14
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Plan should be included in the construction plans for this project. Where formal
construction plans will not be prepared for all or portions of the work, a copy of this
document should be made available to the contractor and appropriate
subcontractors. Subcontractors that will not be receiving copies should be made
aware of the plan's existence and advised where copies can be obtained.
Water quality controls. commonly referred to as Best Management Practices, or
BMPs, are necessary to prevent three distinct types of impacts. The first consists of
damage done as the result of soils being taken up by running water. This type of
damage typically consists of rilling, rutting and loss of topsoil. The second type of
damage is the degradation of water quality that occurs as the water transports the
smaller soil particles. The third type of damage occurs when the running water
reduces its velocity and drops the suspended soils.
The Erosion and Sediment Control features (BMPs) of this plan are designed to
address all three types of damage with the emphasis on preventing the initial soil
uptake. Successful prevention of soil uptake will also prevent damage caused by
degradation of water quality and by soil deposition. While the measures described
below for preventing soil uptake should theoretically prevent any removal of soil,
common sense advises that additional measures will be necessary and indeed, the
DOE Manual requires additional measures. These additional measures will allow
deposition of transported soils under controlled conditions before flows leave the
project site or enter the receiving waters.
The site specific types of BMPs and their locations are described immediately below
in sub-section A. Specific details of the BMPs and the standards required by the
DOE manual follow as sub-sections B - O.
A. Site Specific Construction Phase BMPs
Site specific BMPs are listed in the Mitigation section above. Those BMPs shall
be implemented in addition to any that may later be necessary due to changing
or unforeseen site conditions.
It is expected that minor adjustments, especially the installation of additional
BMPs where an unexpected need arises, will be necessary during the
construction phase of this project. For this reason, discussions of various BMPs
that are not specifically required are included below. These BMPs should be
considered as being held in ready reserve against the possibility that they will be
needed.
The following subsections discuss the various BMPs that may be incorporated in
this plan. Reasons for their use, limitations and benefits associated with specific
BMPs, and additional information are provided.
B. Stabilization and Sediment Trapping (Erosion and Sediment Control
Requirement Number 1)
These requirements are to be considered general in nature and provide a
framework for deciding when and where various BMPs should be utilized. They
15
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
are intended to provide guidance in quickly selecting BMPs for use in unexpected
situations. They apply to both soils that are not yet at final grade and to those
that are at final grade, including soil stockpiles.
1. Stabilization of Exposed Soils
The stabilization of exposed soils is the single most important element of this
plan. If exposed soils are protected such that soil particles are not picked up
by running water, erosion will not occur. Protection of exposed soil consists of
four main areas of effort.
a. Minimize Disturbance of Vegetation
Existing vegetation on the site comprises the best overall protection
against erosion. To protect this resource and to keep the risk of erosion at
a minimum, clearing and grading activities outside of the areas necessary
to construct the improvements shall be kept to an absolute minimum.
Patches of existing vegetation that are within the clearing/grading limits
and may be left intact without hindering the project, shall be left alone
whenever possible.
Care shall be taken that existing vegetation is left intact wherever
possible around the perimeter of the project and particularly along the
lower side of the project. Vegetation in drainage corridors and
immediately below soil disturbing activities is the most valuable and as
such is to be provided with the most protection.
b. Minimize the Length of Time the Soil is Unprotected
Where grading is necessary for construction activities, the grading should
be delayed as long as reasonably possible to minimize the length of time
that the soil is exposed to the elements.
Where exposure of bare soil is necessary to accomplish certain portions of
the work, such portions of the work should be completed promptly in
order to reduce the chance of an erosive rainfall event catching the soil
unprotected.
c. Ensure Prompt Revegetation of Disturbed Areas
Every effort shall be made to ensure a healthy stand of protective
vegetation is established as soon as possible. Reseeding of areas which
are to be planted with grass shall be accomplished within 14 days if
grading operations are completed within a planting season. If grading
operations are completed outside of a planting season, reseeding shall
occur within 7 days following the beginning of the next planting season.
If substantial portions of the project are ready for reseeding at the
beginning of or during a planting season, such portions may be promptly
reseeded without waiting for completion of work on other portions of the
project.
16
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Planting seasons are considered to be between March 1 and May 15 and
between August 15 and October 1 where irrigation is impractical. Where
irrigation is practical, the planting season is considered to be between
March 1 and October 1.
The following seed mix has been tested and found to be adequate for use
for erosion control and for slope stabilization in Western Washington:
Seed Type Percent by Weight
Chewing Fescue 40
Colonial Bentgrass,
Var. Astoria 10
Perennial Rye 40
White Clover 10
100
Other mixes, selected with regard for the soils, uses of the site, method of
application, and expected weather may be used if desired. The
recommendations of the seed supplier should be sought and strongly
considered in selecting a mix.
If the season or construction scheduling will not allow prompt
revegetation of an area where construction activities have been
completed, the area should be covered with plastic sheeting, straw, mulch
or other covering chosen to match the situation and with due regard for
the length of time that the area is expected to remain uncovered.
d. Protective Coverings
Protective coverings are highly recommended for application to exposed
soils that are not being actively worked for an extended period of time.
An extended period of time is considered to be 2 days between October 1
and April 30 or 7 days between May 1 and September 30.
Protective coverings include plastic sheeting, straw, mulch, commercial
sod and other coverings. The particular type of protective covering used
should be chosen based on the steepness of the slope of the area to be
covered, the size of the area to be covered, the time of year, the length of
time the covering will remain, proximity to wetlands or other sensitive
areas, the amount of existing vegetation between the exposed soil and the
downhill project boundary, cost, and the visual impact of the covering.
The best covering is existing vegetation, which should be disturbed as
little as possible. Commercial sod is the next best covering but its use is
often precluded by cost. Clear plastic sheeting is suitable for steep slopes
but is difficult to apply and maintain in moderate to high winds. Black
plastic sheeting is not appropriate during growing seasons except for
short periods oftime. Loose straw, either straight from bales or shredded,
17
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
makes an adequate ground covering on gentle to moderately steep slopes
(no steeper than 2 horizontal to 1 vertical) if it is wet to the point of
limpness. Straw is generally effective where the distance from the top to
the toe of the slope is no more than 100 feet.
Early application of gravel bases, pavements, and special landscaping
items such as washed rock over plastic sheeting is considered to be a
suitable protective covering where otherwise required.
2. Sediment Trapping
Stonnwater runoff from areas of exposed soil shall not be pennitted to leave
the project site without first having passed through an appropriate sediment
trapping system or device. The type of sediment trap should be chosen based
on the potential for erosion from exposed soils, the expected velocity and
depth of flows, the proximity to downstream sensitive areas, and the length
of time that the upstream soils will remain exposed to the elements.
a. Sheet Flow Through Grassy or Heavily Vegetated Areas
Runoff from exposed slopes that are less than 150 feet from top to bottom
(measured along the slope) can be adequately treated by routing flows
through bands of dense grass or other heavy vegetation. The vegetated
band should be a minimum of one fifth as wide as the width of the
exposed slope, but no narrower than 10 feet. For example, a band of
exposed soil 75 feet wide should have a minimum of 15 feet of dense grass
for sediment trapping.
The vegetated band width above is for a slope no steeper than 10 percent.
Where the slope of the vegetated area is between 10 and 20 percent, add
50 percent to the minimum width. Where the slope is greater than 20
percent, the minimum width should be doubled.
For this type of sediment trapping system to be effective, flows must cross
the vegetated area in sheet flows. If flows are expected to arrive at the
vegetated band in concentrated flows, creation of a small artificial delta
may be necessary to force a sheet flow.
18
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
b. Grassy Swales
Grassy swales are used to treat runoff from larger areas than sheet flows
across bands of vegetation. Although grassy swales are usually thought
of as pennanent features, they can often be utilized during the
construction phase. Unfortunately, there is usually insufficient time
before the main construction effort to reshape landfonns to provide the
necessary slopes, widths, etc., and grow vegetation in the swale. Either
an area must be found that is already vegetated and that meets the
minimum requirements for a grassy swale or commercial sod must be
placed along the sides and bottoms of the swale immediately after the
swale is constructed.
The following standard requirements for grassy swales were taken from
the Draft Stonnwater Guidelines published by the Washington State
Department of Fisheries in 1990 and are recommended for use here due
to their simplicity. More specific design criteria are more appropriate for
use on large or complex sites.
i. Soils
Gravelly and coarse sandy soils should be avoided in order to
maximize water contact with vegetation and the soil surface.
ii. Design Criteria
The grassy swale. should be designed based on a two-year, 24-hour
peak flow and the following:
(A) Velocity
Velocities should be less than 1.50 feet per second.
(B) Depth of Flow
The flow depth should be less than 4 inches.
(C) Slope
The longitudinal slope should average two to four percent. Rock or
log check dams or terraces should be installed as necessary to
achieve slopes of less than four percent.
iii. Dimensions
Grassy swales should be located to obtain maximum length. If less
than 200 feet long, the width should be increased by an amount
proportional to the reduction below 200 feet in order to obtain the
same area of vegetation contact.
IV. Side Slopes
Side slopes should be no steeper than three horizontal to one vertical.
19
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
c. Interceptor Swales
Interceptor swales are shallow trenches constructed with a single pass of
a large dozer equipped with one to three ripper teeth. The preferred
configuration of ripper teeth for construction of interceptor swales is two
teeth positioned on the outside of the ripper assembly. This type of swale
construction will tear through existing sod without removing it. Leaving
the sod in place will protect against erosion of the swale bottom on steeper
slopes.
Swales thus constructed are intended to intercept sheet flows and
infiltrate them into the soil. When flows are greater than can be
infiltrated, the swales will provide a path for runoff of excess flows. Such
excess flows will run along the swale until they are either infiltrated or
they enter interceptor ditches.
Interceptor swales are especially effective adjacent to property lines
which run more or less straight up and down a slope and where only sheet
flows are to be intercepted. In order to be effective, the surface of the
ground must not be regraded during the life of the swale. Grading or
blading of the surface of these swales will defeat their purpose.
Construction of interceptor swales causes only minimal disruption of the
ground contours. For this reason the swales need not be removed or
otherwise treated at the end of their usefulness.
d. Other Sediment Trapping Devices and Systems
Many other effective sediment trapping systems and devices are listed in
Table 11-2.1 of the 1992 DOE Manual. Complete details and descriptions
of them are included elsewhere in the DOE Manual. They should be used
where appropriate and as described in the Manual.
C. Delineate Clearing and Easement Limits (Erosion and Sediment Control
Requirement Number 2)
Appropriate clearing limits, property lines, easement lines, and similar
boundaries shall be determined prior to starting construction. Clearing,
grubbing, grading and similar operations shall not begin until the appropriate
limits are staked in the field. Once these stakes are set, care shall be taken that
the stakes are not disturbed.
D. Protection of Adjacent Properties (Erosion and Sediment Control
Requirement Number 3)
As required by the DOE Manual, no flows from exposed or disturbed soils are to
leave the project site without first having been treated with some type of
sediment trapping/filtering system or device. The proposed arrangement ofthese
devices and systems is described above. The individual items are discussed in
more detail in the section on Sediment Trapping above.
20
.
.
.
I
I
.
.
.
I
.
.
I
.
.
.
I
-.
I
I
The protective measures shown on the site plan are designed to prevent
sediment deposition on adjacent properties. To the extent that the various items
are constructed as designed and other work on the site progresses as envisioned,
sediment should not be deposited on neighboring properties.
Last minute changes in other items of work on this project, responses to
previously unknown site conditions, or unexpected weather may require that
revisions to the sediment trapping provisions of this plan be made rapidly. To
this end, the previous section on Sediment Trapping contains design criteria,
comments, information about BMPs, and similar information that is intended to
be used in rapidly responding to changing needs and changing site conditions.
As soon as a previously unexpected threat to adjacent properties becomes
apparent, sufficient measures shall be taken to either eliminate the source of the
threat or to provide an adequate level of defense against the threat. The
measures taken shall provide a level of defense against sediment deposition on
adjacent properties at least as secure as those provided by the remainder of this
plan.
E. Timing and Stabilization of Sediment Trapping Measures (Erosion and
Sediment Control Requirement Number 4)
It is essential that the various sediment trapping systems and devices be
constructed prior to exposing the upslope soils to the elements. Both the timing
of construction of the measures and the stabilization of the slopes of the
structural BMPs are mandatory parts of this plan.
1. Timing of Installation of BMPs
In keeping with the goal of providing positive sediment trapping or removal
for all runoff from exposed soils before the runoff leaves the project site, no
soil shall be exposed, or grading operations performed, until all of the
required BMPs in the drainage path below the area to be exposed have been
completed. Clearing, grubbing, and grading operations necessary for the
construction of the BMPs are excepted from this requirement.
2. Stabilization of slopes of structural BMPs
It is critical that the slopes of ditches, berms, ponds, and similar structural
items be stabilized. These slopes will not only shed as much silt as any other
exposed slope, but their erosion could cause the failure of the structural BMP.
This could easily result in the failure of the BMP to perform its task of
forcing sediment deposition to occur in a controlled location. This would
leave open the potential for erosive transport of soil from a much larger area
than that originally exposed on the slope of the BMP.
F. Cut and Fill Slopes (Erosion and Sediment Control Requirement
Number 5)
Newly created slopes shall be covered or otherwise protected as provided for
elsewhere in this plan.
21
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
The faces of newly created fill slopes shall be well compacted. Since it is often
impossible for typical compaction equipment to adequately compact the outer one
to three feet of a fill, it will be necessary for compaction equipment to be operated
up and down the face of the slope after the fill is completed. Operating tracked
equipment in this manner will provide a certain amount of slope roughness
which is desirable in slowing the velocity of running water and in retaining seed
and fertilizer.
After cut or fill slopes are covered, they should be monitored to ensure that the
covering is functioning as intended and that rills are not fonning under or
through the covering.
G. Controlling Off-Site Erosion (Erosion and Sediment Control Requirement
Number 6)
The BMPs specified by this plan are intended to prevent damage to downstream
and/or adjoining properties. To the extent that construction of this project is
perfonned as intended and all elements of this plan are implemented, there
should be no off-site erosion. It is possible that extensive covering of slopes and
similar practices could increase the volume of peak floods, especially if a stonn
event greater than a two year event were to occur before the site were completely
revegetated and the stonnwater infiltration/detention systems completed.
The possibility of this occurring increases significantly if construction is delayed
and exposed slopes must be covered through a winter rainy season instead of
having been successfully revegetated. While this is not expected to occur, is
possible that the vagaries of the construction trade will cause this to happen. If
this does occur, downstream drainage channels shall be inspected before the end
of the Fall planting season and an inventory made of areas where increased
flows would reasonably be expected to cause erosion. Such areas shall then be
protected in a manner consistent with the goals and guidelines included within
this plan. Those BMPs noted above as being held in "ready reserve" on this
project may be brought up to active status by their use in such off-site situations.
H. Stabilization of Temporary Channels and Outlets (Erosion and Sediment
Control Requirement Number 7)
Channels, slopes, embankments, trenches, and similar areas of disturbed soil
which are required for the implementation of this erosion control plan shall be
subject to the same erosion control requirements as other portions of the project.
In addition to the general protective requirements, specific annoring methods
are included in the appropriate details.
I. Underground Utility Construction (Erosion and Sediment Control
Requirement Number 9)
Underground utility construction shall proceed subject to the following criteria.
A major source of potentially contaminated flows is from pumping or
otherwise dewatering trenches. For this reason, flows discharged from
pumping or other method of trench dewatering shall be closely monitored
22
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
and, except where there is no visible turbidity, treated as described below in
the Section titled "Dewatering Construction Sites."
Where feasible, no more than 500 feet of trench shall be opened at one time.
Where consistent with safety and space considerations, stockpiles of
excavated soils shall be placed on the uphill side of the trench. Any such
stockpiles shall be protected from erosion as provided for in this plan.
Trenches shall be backfilled and revegetated as soon as reasonably possible
, following placement of utilities. Wherever trenches run more or less straight
up and down a slope, either the backfill shall be mounded over the trench or
waterbars or similar BMPs shall be utilized as necessary to prevent the
backfilled trench from becoming a water course. Simply covering the exposed
soil may not prevent the trench from conveying waters.
Where the upstream end of a pipe is subject to inundation, it shall be
temporarily capped or plugged at the end of each day's work to prevent soil
from being washed into the pipe.
The underground utility locate service, 1-800-424-5555, shall be called a
minimum of 48 hours (2 working days) prior to beginning any excavation and
arrangements made to have all buried utilities marked.
J. Construction Access Routes (Erosion and Sediment Control Requirement
Number 10)
It is expected that minor amounts of soil will be tracked onto paved roads,
especially when unexpected circumstances such as rains and delays occur. To
prevent this from becoming a nuisance or source of sedimentation, the roads
shall be cleaned thoroughly at the end of each day if there is evidence of any
. significant accumulation of soil. Sediment shall be removed from roads by
shoveling or sweeping and be transported to a controlled sediment disposal area.
Washing of the street shall be allowed only after sediment is removed in this
manner. Wherever construction, delivery, and similar vehicles enter paved roads
from this project, the following provisions shall be followed to minimize the
transport of soil onto the paved road.
During periods of dry weather (where the soil is too dry to adhere to the tires of
construction vehicles) construction vehicles may access paved streets directly
from the project site with monitoring and occasional sweeping of the paved street
as necessary to prevent accumulations of soil.
During periods of wet weather (where soil readily adheres to the tires of vehicles)
the vehicles may access graveled roads directly from the project site as
necessary, but shall not access paved roads without first having been routed over
areas where existing grass or other vegetation remains or routed down a
minimum of 150 feet of graveled road. Access routes over grass or other
vegetation shall be changed occasionally to ensure that wheel ruts are not
allowed to develop and that the vegetation is not unduly worn down.
23
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
i I
K. Removal of Temporary BMPs (Erosion and Sediment Control
Requirement Number 11)
Temporary Erosion Control Facilities shall be promptly (within 60 days)
removed, once their presence is no longer required. During their removal, any
entrapped sediment shall be disposed of in suitable locations on the project site
where they will not be subject to erosion. Disturbed areas left after the removal
of sediments shall be promptly stabilized.
As an alternate to the removal of entrapped sediments, they may be stabilized in
place by the application of suitable BMPs such as sodding, mulching, seeding,
etc.
In no case shall sediments be left in a channel or where they would be washed
into receiving waters by the next stonn. The role of the Erosion Control
Facilities is to prevent sediments from entering waters, not to merely delay it
until after construction is completed.
Dewatering Construction Sites
Requirement Number 12)
Discharges from pumps used in dewatering trenches or other portions of a
construction site shall be dispersed by one of the following methods:
L.
(Erosion and Sediment Control
Directing flows onto existing heavily vegetated areas. If this is done, the
flows shall be directed against objects such as old tires or stumps, capable of
disrupting concentrated flows.
Directing flows onto a pad constructed of clean, pit run gravel or washed
drain rock or pea gravel. The pad shall be a minimum of 15 feet square and
flows shall be directed into a circle of 6 - 8 inch diameter stones to assist in
dispersing flows into sheet flows.
Directing flows directly into a grassy swale or other sediment trapping BMP,
constructed per this plan.
In no case shall flows discharged from a pump be allowed to remain as a
concentrated flow. Every effort shall be made to break the flows into sheet flows.
In all cases, flows from dewatering shall be routed through a sediment trapping
BMP before being released off of the site.
M. Control of Pollutanta Other than Sediment (Erosion and Sediment
Control Requirement Number 13)
All potential pollutants other than sediments that may occur on the site during
the construction process shall be handled and disposed of in a manner that does
not cause contamination of stonnwater.
24
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1. Control of'lbxic Substances
No toxic or noxious substances shall be used, stored or disposed of on or off
the project site in conjunction with the project except in full compliance with
all applicable federal, state and local laws and regulations and the
recommendations of the supplier of the substance. The product label or
instructions for use and the Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDS) for such
products shall be kept on the site until the product has been used up or
removed from the site and properly disposed of.
While not commonly thought of as a hazardous material, common fertilizer
can be very damaging if allowed to enter receiving waters. Fertilizers shall
only be used in accordance with the recommendations of the supplier and any
concentrations such as dribbles or leaks shall be cleaned up.
In the event of a spill or other unusual event involving toxic or hazardous
materials, work in the vicinity shall be immediately stopped and the
following agencies notified:
Washington State Department of Ecology, (206) 459-6000 during normal
business hours or (206) 753-2353 after hours.
If the incident presents a threat to life, health, or property, the Fire and
Police Departments shall be notified by dialing 911.
2. Petroleum Spills
The following requirements are included to ensure compliance with Part 40 of
CFR 112 in cases where SPCC Plans are required. They shall be followed on
all projects.
Storage of fuel for construction vehicles and fueling of construction vehicles
shall be performed in accordance with the following requirements:
a. Driver Training
All employees assigned to operate fuel trucks will be properly trained in
appropriate regulations and safety procedures. Training shall include
proper inspection and use of tanks, hatches, valves, pumps, hoses and fuel
delivery equipment.
b. Fueling of Vehicles
Fuel nozzles shall be locked when not attended and hoses shall be
rewound or otherwise properly stored when not in use. Unattended
fueling which relies on the proper operation of automatic shutoff nozzles
shall not be permitted.
25
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
c. Parking of Fuel Tankers
Parking areas for fuel trucks shall be selected such that spills will not
leave the area. Fuel trucks shall not be parked closer than 25 feet to a
conveyance BMP such as a grassy swale or interceptor swale. When fuel
trucks must be taken to other portions of the project to fuel equipment,
they must be continuously attended or returned to the staging/storage
area. Fuel trucks shall be locked with the wheels chocked when
unattended and not in use.
d. Containment of Spills
Spills shall be immediately diked and every effort made to stop spillage.
Each fuel truck shall carry a long handled shovel for use in containing
spills. In the event of a spill, the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency,
Seattle, Washington (206) 442-1263, shall be notified as soon as possible.
If the magnitude of the spill is such that it presents an immediate threat
to life, health, or property, it shall be promptly reported by dialing 911.
N. Maintenance (Erosion and Sediment Control Requirement Number 14)
This section constitutes the Operation and Maintenance Manual for the erosion
and sediment control BMPs used during the construction phase of this project.
Most of the various BMPs required to maintain water quality during the
construction phase of this project are of a temporary nature. They are neither
intended nor expected to remain in service for months at a time. The typical
BMP often has a life expectancy of only 6 - 12 weeks unless time and effort are
expended to bring it back to its original condition.
Foul weather, rough use, overloading and similar conditions will reduce the life
of these items. It is critical that all of the erosion and sediment control BMPs be
maintained in their intended condition until they have served their purpose and
are ready to be removed.
The project foreman shall inspect the various parts of the system at least once
daily during rainy weather. In addition, the foreman shall perform additional
inspections during or immediately after significant rainfall. Any damaged or
non-functioning components of the system shall be repaired before noon of the
next day.
In addition to verifying that the various BMPs are functioning as intended, the
foreman shall check for formation of rills, deposits of silt and similar indications
that the system is not functioning properly. If it is found that the system is not
performing its role in preventing erosion and sedimentation, additional BMPs
shall be provided as necessary.
Specific maintenance instructions for the various erosion and sediment control
BMPs are contained in the DOE Manual.
26
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
O. Financial Responsibility
Construction, operation, maintenance, replacement, and final removal of the.
erosion and sedimentation control BMPs is an integral part of the construction of
this project. When referenced as such by the construction contract or similar
documents, this plan forms a part of the construction plans for this project. In
such cases the erosion and sedimentation control work is covered under
applicable financial instruments such as the contractor's and developer's bonds
to the same extent as all other items of work shown in the construction plans.
27
I
I
File: SEAH01. WB2 Date: April 14, 2006
BASIN DATA
PROJECT: Seahome Services, Inc., 247 Franks Lane
I
Pre development
I
Undetained
0.1148 (Ac) +
81. 0
6. (min)
Detained
0.0000
100.0
6
Area:
Cn:
Tc:
I
Postdeveloprnent Basin Data
I
(Ac)
Total
0.1148 (Ac)
(min)
Undetained Detained
Area: 0.0000 (Ac) + 0.1148 (Ac)
en: 100.0 98.0
Tc: 6 (min) 6 (min)
Total
0.1148 (Ac)
I
RAINFALL
I
24 hr rainfall depth
I
:2 yr storm:
25 yr storm:
100 yr storm:
2.80 (in)
5.00 (in)
5.70 (in)
I
PRBDEVELOPMENT RUNOFF
I
I
:2 yr storm.:
25 yr storm:
100 yr storm:
I
POSTDEVELOPMENT RUNOFF
I
Peak Runoff From
Undeveloped Portln
(Undetained)
------------------ -----(Qpos1)-----
2 yr storm: 0.0000 (cfs)
25 yr storm: 0.0000 (efs)
100 yr storm: 0.0000 (efs)
I
I
Peak
Runoff From
Entire Basin
------------------ -----(Qpos)------
2 yr storm: 0.0799 (efs)
25 yr storm: 0.1454 (efs)
100 yr storm: 0.1661 (cfs)
I
I
I
Peak
Basin Rainfall
------ (Qr) __n_n
0.1050 (cfs)
0.1875 (efs)
0.2138 (efs)
Peak
Pre-Devt Runoff
------(Qpre)-----
0.0307 (efs)
0.0895 (cfs)
0.1097 (efs)
Peak Runoff From
Developed Portln
(Detained)
_n__ (Qpos2) -----
0.0799 (efs)
0.1454 (efs)
0.1661 (cfs)
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
~
~
~
o
.
.
"
o
.!
.
"
~
.,
~
.
o
"
.
~
n
.
~
o
~
~~....
o . c
!i~~
~a
;;
.
c
~
.
~
.
:!!
.
o
o
~
~
.
~
~
c
u
"
:0
00
00
~~
~~
. .
. .
.'l ~
.!
00
00
00
00
00
00
.
o
o
~
.
~
~
n
.
~
o
~
00
00
00
o
~
.
o
o
o
o
o
o
.
.
.'l
o
o
o
o
~
~
.,
~-----------------~--~---
S ~ :~~:g~
~ c ~ : ".; n :.... :ri
Ca:l U I 0 I <XI
" , ,
, X , I
., , ,
g; :s : :
.,
15
~
~
~
I
.,
>
Ii
~
~
o
5
~
~
.
~
~
"
~
~
~
N
o
c
~
.
.
o
E
.
.,
.
]
.
.
.,
~
u
.,
a
~
~
~~-
o.B
s~-
~a
;;
.
c
~
.
~
.
'0
2
.
o
o
~
.
~
..
.
e
..
"
~
.
.
b
1l
:l
"
.
11
~
~
..
~
.
o
"
"
"
9
o
.
.,
..
!i~
~&
00
00
~m
~~
. .
. .
.'l ~
.!
00
~o
~o
~o
~o
00
..
.
e
..
"
~
.
.
b
'0
C
.
"
"
.
11
~
~
..
~
~
"
"
1l
o
o
.
~
0>
g g
"~
o
o
~
~
00
~o
~o
~o
~o
00
. .
. .
. .
.'l.'l
. "
o .
0"
~ c
~~
. 0
~ .
~
n
.
~
o
~
~
~
.
00
~o
~o
~o
~o
00
. .
. .
. .
.'l.'l
. .
o 0
o 0
H
. .
~ ~
n ~
.
~n
o .
~~
~
o
~
~
~
~
o
.
.
.
.'l
n
.
~
o
~
o
o
o
~
;;
.
'0
!i
,g
c
o
~
~
"
~
.
o
o
~
.
~
~
~
o
"
.
~
.
~
a
~
~
o
!i
~
.
0>
.
"
~
<
'0
.
~
'"
0>
~
.
~
;;
.
'0
!i
o
"
c
o
~
~
"
o
~
.
o
o
~
~
.
~
~
o
"
!
.
~
a
~
~
o
!i
~
.
0>
.
"
.
>
<
'0
.
~
'"
0>
~
.
~
o
~
~
;;
.
c
~
.
~
.
:!!
.
o
o
~
.
~
~
~
N
B
~
~
~~
N~
~o
~
.
o
~
~
~
~
o
.
.
.'l
.
6
~
~
~
n
.
~
~
o
o
~
~
'0
.
'0
!i
o
~
t:
~
~------------------------
S' : 00 : 0 0
~ 100 . 0
, .0, 0
Q 8 :go:g~
, ,.-l l.-l
foo X I I
., , ,
~ .5 : :
n
.
o
"
.
~
.
"
~
~
ti
~
o
"
.
11
o
z
~
a
~
~
o
!i
'"
.
0>
.
"
.
i<
'0
.
~
'"
0>
~
.
~
~
c
.
a
o
~
.
>
.
'0
.
"
~
::;:@-
~~Q
"'a
;;
.
c
~
.
~
.
'0
2
.
o
o
~
~
.
~
"
:0
~ 0
~z_
~~Q
~a
00
00
~~
~~
. .
. ~
.'l 0
.!
00
o ~
O~
O~
O~
00
..
.
e
..
"
~
.
.
P
'0
C
.
"
"
.
11
~
..
..
~
.
o
"
"
11
o
o
.
~
..
!i~
:2&
00
00
~~
~~
. .
. .
" "
< 0
.!
00
00
00
00
00
00
..
.
e
..
"
~
.
.
P
'0
C
.
"
"
.
11
~
..
..
~
.
o
"
"
11
o
o
.
~
0>
!i~
o 0
" ~
o
o
~
~
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
O~
O~
O~
o ~
00
. .
. .
. .
.'l.'l
.. .
.. .
.. .
"" "
<< <
.. n
o 0 .
o 0 ~
~~ {?
,n-
o
n~
.
~n
o .
~~
o
~
. "
o .
0'0
~ C
~~
. ~
~ .
~
n
.
~
o
~
~
.,
.
o
~
~
~
~
o
o
~
~
;;
.
'0
!i
o
~
c
o
~
~
"
o
~
.
6
~
.
!
~
o
"
.
~
~
a
~
~
o
!i
~
~
'0
.
~
'"
~
.
~
o
~
~
;;
.
1l
o
o
"
;;
.
'0
C
6
~
c
o
~
~
"
o
~
.
o
o
~
~
.
~
n
.
o
"
.
~
.
"
~
~
ti
~
o
"
.
~
.
~
a
~
o
"
i
z
.
~
o
u
~
~
~
.
0>
~
.
i<
'0
.
~
'"
0>
~
.
~
~
c
.
a
o
~
.
>
.
'0
~
.
o
~
~
~
o
c
o
~
~
'0
.
~
'"
0>
~
.
~
I
I PROJEeT: Seahorne Services, Inc. , 247 Franks Lane
25 yr storm (B)
-------------------------------------------------------------
I Total Basin Area = 5001 sq ft = 0.1148 Ae
Storm Duration = 24 hr
Peak Rainfall Intensity 0.188 efs
Total Rainfall Volume 2084 eu ft
I Total, 24 hr rainfall 5.00 in
Rainfall Data
I Standard ses Type 1A -----------------------------------
24 hr hyetograph (adj'd) Total Cumulative
from King eo Drn Manual Basin Preeip precip
------------------------ Rainfall Depth Depth
I Time % Cumulative Time P pr Pre
(min) Precip % Precip (hrs) (cfs) (in) (in)
------- ------- -------- ------- ------- ------- -------
I 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
10 0.40 0.40 0.17 0.0139 0.0200 0.0200
20 0.40 0.80 0.33 0.0139 0.0200 0.0400
I 30 0.40 1.20 0.50 0.0139 0.0200 0.0600
40 0.40 1.60 0.67 0.0139 0.0200 0.0800
50 0.40 2.00 0.83 0.0139 0.0200 0.1000
60 0.40 2.40 1.00 0.0139 0.0200 0.1200
I 70 0.40 2.80 1.17 0.0139 0.0200 0.1400
80 0.40 3.20 1. 33 0.0139 0.0200 0.1600
90 0.40 3.60 1.50 0.0139 0.0200 0.1800
I 100 0.40 4.00 1.67 0.0139 0.0200 0.2000
110 0.50 4.50 1.83 0.0174 0.0250 0.2250
120 0.50 5.00 2.00 0.0174 0.0250 0.2500
I 130 0.50 5.50 2.17 0.0174 0.0250 0.2750
140 0.50 6.00 2.33 0.0174 o . 0250 0.3000
150 0.50 6.50 2.50 0.0174 0.0250 0.3250
160 0.50 7.00 2.67 0.0174 0.0250 0.3500
I 170 0.60 7.60 2.83 0.0208 0.0300 0.3800
180 0.60 8.20 3.00 '0.0208 0.0300 0.4100
190 0.60 8.80 3.17 0.0208 0.0300 0.4400
I 200 0.60 9.40 3.33 0.0208 0.0300 0.4700
210 0.60 10.00 3.50 0.0208 0.0300 0.5000
220 0.60 10.60 3.67 0.0208 0.0300 0.5300
230 0.70 11.30 3.83 0.0243 0.0350 0.5650
I 240 0.70 12.00 4.00 0.0243 0.0350 0.6000
250 0.70 12.70 4.17 0.0243 0.0350 0.6350
260 0.70 13.40 4.33 0.0243 0.0350 0.6700
I 270 0.70' 14.10 4.50 0.0243 0.0350 0.7050
280 0.70 14.80 4.67 0.0243 0.0350 0.7400
290 0.82 15.62 4.83 0.0285 0.0410 0.7810
I 300 0.82 16.44 5.00 0.0285 0.0410 0.8220
310 0.82 17.26 5.17 0.0285 0.0410 0.8630
320 0.82 18.08 5.33 0.0285 0.0410 0.9040
330 0.82 18.90 5.50 0.0285 0.0410 0.9450
I 340 0.82 19.72 5.67 0.0285 0.0410 0.9860
350 0.95 20.67 5.83 0.0330 0.0475 1.0335
360 0.95 21. 62 6.00 0.0330 0.0475 1.0810
I 370 0.95 22.57 6.17 0.0330 0.0475 1.1285
380 0.95 23.52 6.33 0.0330 0.0475 1.1760
i I
I
I PROJEeT: Seahome Services, Inc. , 247 Franks Lane
25 yr storm (B)
-------------------------------------------------------------
I Total Basin Area = 5001 sq ft = 0.1148 Ae
Storm Duration = 24 hr
Peak Rainfall Intensity = 0.188 efs
Total Rainfall Volume 2084 eu ft
I Total, 24 hr rainfall 5.00 in
Rainfall Data
I Standard SCS Type 1A -----------------------------------
24 hr hyetograph (adj'd) Total Cumulative
from King Co Om Manual Basin Precip precip
I ------------------------ Rainfall Depth Depth
Time % CUmulative Time P Pr Pre
(min) Precip % Preeip (hrs) (cfs) (in) (in)
------- ------- -------- ------- ------- ------- -------
I 390 0.95 24.47 6.50 0.0330 0.0475 1.2235
400 0.95 25.42 6.67 0.0330 0.0475 1.2710
410 1. 33 26.75 6.83 0.0462 0.0665 1.3375
I 420 1.33 28.08 7.00 0.0462 0.0665 1.4040
430 1. 33 29.41 7.17 0.0462 0.0665 1.4705
440 1.80 31.21 7.33 0.0625 0.0900 1. 5605
450 1.80 33.01 7.50 0.0625 0.0900 1. 6505
I 460 3.40 36.41 7.67 0.1181 0.1700 1. 8205
470 5.40 41.81 7.83 0.1875 0.2700 2.0905
480 2.70 44.51 8.00 0.0938 0.1350 2.2255
I 490 1. 80 46.31 8.17 0.0625 0.0900 2.3155
500 1.34 47.65 8.33 0.0465 0.0670 2.3825
510 1.34 48.99 8.50 0.0465 0.0670 2.4495
I 520 1.34 50.33 8.67 0.0465 0.0670 2.5165
530 0.88 51. 21 8.83 0.0306 0.0440 2.5605
540 0.88 52.09 9.00 0.0306 0.0440 2.6045
550 0.88 52.97 9.17 0.0306 0.0440 2.6485
I 560 0.88 53.85 9.33 0.0306 0.0440 2.6925
570 0.88 54.73 9.50 0.0306 0.0440 2.7365
580 0.88 55.61 9.67 0.0306 0.0440 2.7805
I 590 0.88 56.49 9.83 0.0306 0.0440 2.8245
600 0.88 57.37 10.00 0.0306 0.0440 2.8685
610 0.88 58.25 10.17 0.0306 0.0440 2.9125
I 620 0.88 59.13 10.33 0.0306 0.0440 2.9565
630 0.88 60.01 10.50 0.0306 0.0440 3.0005
640 0.88 60.89 10.67 0.0306 0.0440 3.0445
650 0.72 61. 61 10.83 0.0250 0.0360 3.0805
I 660 0.72 62.33 11.00 0.0250 0.0360 3.1165
670 0.72 63.05 11.17 0.0250 0.0360 3.1525
680 0.72 63.77 11. 33 0.0250 0.0360 3.1885
I 690 0.72 64.49 11. 50 0.0250 0.0360 3.2245
700 0.72 65.21 11. 67 0.0250 0.0360 3.2605
710 0.72 65.93 11.83 0.0250 0.0360 3.2965
720 0.72 66.65 12.00 0.0250 0.0360 3.3325
I 730 0.72 67.37 12.17 0.0250 0.0360 3.3685
740 0.72 68.09 12.33 0.0250 0.0360 3.4045
750 0.72 68.81 12.50 0.0250 0.0360 3.4405
I 760 0.72 69.53 12.67 0.0250 0.0360 3.4765
770 0.57 70.10 12.83 0.0198 0.0285 3.5050
I
I
I
PROJEeT: Seahome Services, Inc., 247 Franks Lane
25 yr storm (8)
-------------------------------------------------------------
Total Basin Area = 5001 sq ft =
Storm Duration =
Peak Rainfall Intensity
Total Rainfall Volume
Total, 24 hr rainfall
I
I
I
Standard SCS Type 1A
24 hr hyetograph (adj'd)
from King eo Drn Manual
I
Time
(min)
0.1148 Ae
24 hr
0.188 efs
2084 eu ft
5.00 in
Rainfall Data
-----------------------------------
% eumulative
Preeip % Preeip
Time
(hrs)
Total
Basin
Rainfall
P
(efs)
Cumulative
Precip precip
Depth Depth
pr Pre
(in) (in)
------- ------- -------- ------- ------- ------- -------
I
780
790
800
810
820
830
840
850
860
870
880
890
900
910
920
930
940
950
960
970
980
990
1000
1010
1020
1030
1040
1050
1060
1070
1080
1090
1100
1110
1120
1130
1140
1150
1160
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
0.57
0.57
0.57
0.57
0.57
0.57
0.57
0.57
0.57
0.57
0.57
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.43
0.40
0.40
0.40
0.40
0.40
0.40
0.40
0.40
0.40
0.40
0.40
0.40
0.40
0.40
0.40
70.67
71.24
71.81
72 .38
72.95
73.52
74.09
74.66
75.23
75.80
76.37
76.87
77 .37
77.87
78.37
78.87
79.37
79.87
80.37
80.87
81.37
81. 87
82.37
82.80
83.20
83.60
84.00
84.40
84.80
85.20
85.60
86.00
86.40
86.80
87.20
87.60
88.00
88.40
88.80
13.00
13.17
13 .33
13 .50
13.67
13.83
14.00
14.17
14.33
14.50
14.67
14.83
15.00
15.17
15.33
15.50
15.67
15.83
16.00
16.17
16.33
16.50
16.67
16.83
17.00
17.17
17.33
17.50
17.67
17.83
18.00
18.17
18.33
18.50
18.67
18.83
19.00
19.17
19.33
0.0198
0.0198
0.0198
0.0198
0.0198
0.0198
0.0198
0.0198
0.0198
0.0198
0.0198
0.0174
0.0174
0.0174
0.0174
0.0174
0.0174
0.0174
0.0174
0.0174
0.0174
0.0174
0.0174
0.0149
0.0139
0.0139
0.0139
0.0139
0.0139
0.0139
0.0139
0.0139
0.0139
0.0139
0.0139
0.0139
0.0139
0.0139
0.0139
0.0285
0.0285
0.0285
0.0285
0.0285
0.0285
0.0285
0.0285
0.0285
0.0285
0.0285
0.0250
0.0250
0.0250
0.0250
0.0250
0.0250
0.0250
0.0250
0.0250
0.0250
0.0250
0.0250
0.0215
0.0200
0.0200
0.0200
0.0200
o . 0200
0.0200
0.0200
0.0200
0.0200
0.0200
0.0200
0.0200
0.0200
0.0200
0.0200
3.5335
3.5620
3.5905
3.6190
3.6475
3.6760
3 . 7045
3.7330
3.7615
3.7900
3.8185
3.8435
3.8685
3.8935
3.9185
3.9435
3.9685
3.9935
4.0185
4.0435
4.0685
4.0935
4.1185
4.1400
4.1600
4.1800
4.2000
4.2200
4.2400
4.2600
4.2800
4.3000
4.3200
4.3400
4.3600
4.3800
4.4000
4.4200
4.4400
I
I PROJEeT: Seahorne Services, Inc. , 247 Franks Lane
25 yr storm (B)
-------------------------------------------------------------
Total Basin Area = 5001 sq ft = 0.1148 Ae
I Storm Duration = 24 hr
Peak Rainfall Intensity 0.188 efs
Total Rainfall Volume 2084 eu ft
I Total, 24 hr rainfall 5.00 in
Rainfall Data
I Standard ses Type 1A -----------------------------------
24 hr hyetograph (adj'd) Total Cumulative
from King Co Drn Manual Basin Precip Precip
------------------------ Rainfall Depth Depth
I Time % Cumulative Time P Pr Pre
(min) Precip % Preeip (hrs) (efs) (in) (in)
------- ------- -------- ------- ------- ------- -------
I 1170 0.40 89.20 19.50 0.0139 0.0200 4.4600
1180 0.40 89.60 19.67 0.0139 0.0200 4.4800
1190 0.40 90.00 19.83 0.0139 0.0200 4.5000
1200 0.40 90.40 20.00 0.0139 0.0200 4.5200
I 1210 0.40 90.80 20.17 0.0139 0.0200 4.5400
1220 0.40 91.20 20.33 0.0139 0.0200 4.5600
1230 0.40 91. 60 20.50 0.0139 0.0200 4.5800
I 1240 0.40 92.00 20.67 0.0139 0.0200 4.6000
1250 0.40 92 .40 20.83 0.0139 o . 0200 4.6200
1260 0.40 92.80 21. 00 0.0139 0.0200 4.6400
I 1270 0.40 93.20 21.17 0.0139 0.0200 4.6600
1280 0.40 93.60 21. 33 0.0139 0.0200 4.6800
1290 0.40 94.00 21. 50 0.0139 0.0200 4.7000
1300 0.40 94.40 21. 67 0.0139 0.0200 4.7200
I 1310 0.40 94.80 21. 83 o . 0139 0.0200 4.7400
1320 0.40 95.20 22.00 0.013 9 0.0200 4.7600
1330 0.40 95.60 22.17 0.0139 0.0200 4.7800
I 1340 0.40 96.00 22.33 0.0139 0.0200 4.8000
1350 0.40 96.40 22.50 0.0139 0.0200 4.8200
1360 0.40 96.80 22.67 0.0139 0.0200 4.8400
I 1370 0.40 97.20 22.83 0.0139 0.0200 4.8600
1380 0.40 97.60 23.00 0.0139 0.0200 4.8800
1390 0.40 98.00 23.17 0.0139 0.0200 4.9000
1400 0.40 98.40 23.33 0.0139 0.0200 4.9200
I 1410 0.40 98.80 23.50 0.0139 0.0200 4.9400
1420 0.40 99.20 23.67 0.0139 0.0200 4.9600
1430 0.40 99.60 23.83 0.0139 0.0200 4.9800
I 1440 0.40 100.00 24.00 0.0139 0.0200 5.0000
1450 0.00 100.00 24.17 0.0000 0.0000 5.0000
1460 0.00 100.00 24.33 0.0000 0.0000 5.0000
I 1470 0.00 100.00 24.50 0.0000 0.0000 5.0000
1480 0.00 100.00 24.67 0.0000 0.0000 5.0000
1490 0.00 100.00 24.83 0.0000 0.0000 5.0000
1500 0.00 100.00 25.00 0.0000 0.0000 5.0000
I ------- -------
100.00 5.0000
I
I
I
PROJECT : Seahorne Services. Inc. , 2.7 Franks Lane
I Generation of Postdevelopment Runoff Hydrograph - Santa Barbara Urban Hydrograph Method
25 yr storm (A) Qpeak _ 0.1454 cf.
Vtotal - 1985 cu ft
I Pervious Portion of Basin Impervious Portion of Basin
------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------
Pervious Area _ o 'q ft Impervious Area 5000.688 .q ft
0.0000 Ac 0.1148 Ac
I Runoff CUrve Number, Cn_ 100 Runof f CUrve Number, Cn_ 98.0
Time of Coneentrat'n, Tc _ 6 min Time of Concentrat'n, Tc - 6 min
Pot'l Max Nat'l Det'n, S _ 0.0000 in Pot'l Max Nat'l D@t'n, S _ 0.2041 in
Routing Coefficient. w _ 0.4545 Routing Coefficient. w _ 0.4545
I ------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------
CUmulative CUmulative
CUmulative Ins tan- Instan- CUmulative Instan- Instan-
Excess Excess taneous taneous Routed Excess Excess taneoue taneous Routed Total
Precip Precip Runoff Runof f Runoff Precip precip Runoff Runoff Runoff Runoff
I Time R Rc Oi Vc Or R Rc Oi Vc Or 0
(hrs) (in) (in) (cfs) (eu ft) (efs) (in) (in) (ds) leu ft) (cfs) (cfs)
[o.ooJ 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000
[0.17J 0.0200 0.0200 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000
I [0.33J 0.0200 0.0400 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0000
[0.50J 0.0200 0.0600 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0016 0.0016 0.0011 1 0.0005 0.0005
CO.67} 0.0200 0.0800 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0047 0.0063 0.0032 3 0.0020 0.0020
[0.831 0.0200 0.1000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0070 0.0133 0.0049 6 0.0039 0.0039
I [1.00J 0.0200 0.1200 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0088 0.0221 0.0061 9 0.0053 0.0053
(1.17] 0.0200 0.1400 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0103 0.0324 0.0072 14 0.0065 0.0065
[1.33] 0.0200 0.1600 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0115 0.0439 0.0080 18 0.0075 0.0075
(1.50) 0.0200 0.1800 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0125 0.0564 0.0087 2. 0.0083 0.0083
C1.67] 0.0200 0.2000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0133 0.0698 0.0093 29 0.0089 0.0089
I [1.83) 0.0250 0.2250 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0176 0.0874 0.0122 36 0.0106 0.0106
[2.00] 0.0250 0.2500 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0185 0.1059 0.0129 .. 0.0124 0.0124
[2.17] 0.0250 0.2750 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0193 0.1251 0.0134 52 0.0130 0.0130
[2.33] 0.0250 0.3000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0199 0.1450 0.0138 60 0.0135 0.0135
(2.50J 0.0250 0.3250 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0204 0.1654 0.0142 69 0.0139 0.0139
I [2.67] 0.0250 0.3500 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0208 0.1862 0.0145 78 0.0143 0.0143
[2.83) 0.0300 0.3800 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0255 0.2118 0.0177 88 0.0159 0.0159
(3.00] 0.0300 0.4100 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0260 0.2378 0.0180 99 0.0177 0.0177
[3.17] 0.0300 0.4400 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0264 0.2641 0.0183 110 0.0181 0.0181
[3.33J 0.0300 0.4700 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0267 0.2909 0.0186 121 0.0184 0.0184
I [3.S0J 0.0300 0.5000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0270 0.3179 0.0188 132 0.0186 0.0186
[3.67] 0.0300 0.5300 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0273 0.3452 0.0189 H. 0.0188 0.0188
(3.83] 0.0350 0.5650 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0321 0.3773 0.0223 157 0.0205 0.0205
[4.00J 0.0350 0.6000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0324 0.4097 0.0225 171 0.0222 0.0222
I [4.17) 0.0350 0.6350 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0326 0.4423 0.0226 18. 0.0225 0.0225
[4.33J 0.0350 0.6700 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0328 0.4751 0.0228 198 0.0227 0.0227
[4.50] 0.0350 0.7050 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0330 0.5081 0.0229 212 0.0228 0.0228
(4.67] 0.0350 0.7400 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0331 0.5412 0.0230 226 0.0230 0.0230
[4.83] 0.0410 0.7810 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0390 0.5802 0.0271 2.2 0.0249 0.0249
I [5.00) 0.0410 0.8220 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0392 0.6194 0.0272 258 0.0269 0.0269
(5.17] 0.0410 0.8630 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0393 0.6587 0.0273 27. 0.0272 0.0272
(5.33) 0.0410 0.9040 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0394 0.6981 0.0274 291 0.0273 0.0273
[5.50] 0.0410 0.9450 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0396 0.7377 0.0275 307 0.0274 0.0274
[5.67] 0.0410 0.9860 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0397 0.7773 0.0275 32. 0.0275 0.0275
I (5.83J 0.0475 1.0335 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0461 0.8234 0.0320 343 0.0296 0.0296
[6.00] 0.0475 1.0810 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0462 0.8696 0.0321 362 0.0318 0.0318
[6.17J 0.0475 1.1285 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0463 0.9158 0.0321 382 0.0321 0.0321
{6.33] 0.0475 1.1760 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0464 0.9622 0.0322 .01 0.0322 0.0322
I [6.50J 0.0475 1.2235 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0464 1.0086 0.0323 420 0.0322 0.0322
(6.67J 0.0475 1.2710 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0465 1.0551 0.0323 440 0.0323 0.0323
[6.83] 0.0665 1. 3375 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0652 1.1204 0.0453 '67 0.0382 0.0382
[7.00] 0.0665 1.4040 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0653 1.1857 0.0454 49' 0.0447 0.0447
[7.17] 0.0665 1.4705 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0654 1.2511 0.0454 521 0.0453 0.0453
I (7.33] 0.0900 1.5605 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0887 1.3398 0.0616 558 0.0528 0.0528
(7.50J 0.0900 1. 6505 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0888 1.4286 0.0617 595 0.0608 0.0608
[7.67] 0.1700 1.8205 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1680 1.5966 0.1167 665 0.0866 0.0866
[7.83J 0.2700 2.0905 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.2675 1.8641 0.1858 777 0.1454 0.1454
l8.00] 0.1350 2.2255 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.1340 1.9980 0.0930 833 0.1399 0.1399
I [8.17] 0.0900 2.3155 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0894 2.0874 0.0621 870 0.0832 0.0832
[8.33J 0.0670 2.3825 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0666 2.1540 0.0462 898 0.0568 0.0568
(8.50] 0.0670 2.4495 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0666 2.2205 0.0462 925 0.0472 0.0472
[8.67) 0.0670 2.5165 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0666 2.2871 0.0463 953 0.0463 0.0463
{8.83] 0.0440 2.5605 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0437 2.3309 0.0304 '71 0.0390 0.0390
I (9.00] 0.0440 2.6045 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0438 2.3747 0.0304 990 0.0312 0.0312
[9.17J 0.0440 2.6485 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0438 2.4184 0.0304 1008 0.0305 0.0305
[9.33] 0.0440 2.6925 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0438 2.4622 0.0304 1026 0.0304 0.0304
.
, I
I
PROJECT : Seahorne Services, Inc. , 247 Franks Lane
I Generation of Postdevelopment Runoff Hydrograph - Santa Barbara Urban Hydrograph Method
25 yr storm (Al Qpeak _ 0.1454 cfs
Vtotal - 1985 cu ft
I Pervious Portion of Basin Impervious Portion of Basin
------------------------------------------- --------~----------------------------------
Pervious Area _ o sq ft Impervious Area _ 5000.688 sq ft
0.0000 Ac 0.1148 Ac
I Runoff CUrve Number, Cn_ 100 Runof f CUrve Number, Cn_ 98.0
Time of Concentrat'n, Tc . 6 min Time of Concentrat'n, Tc _ 6 min
Pot'l Max Nat'l Det'n, S 0.0000 in Pot'l Max Nat'l Det'n, S _ 0.2041 in
Routing Coefficient, w _ 0.4545 Routing Coefficient, w _ 0.4545
------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------
I CUmulative CUmulative
CUmulative Instan- Instan- Cumulative Instan- Instan-
Excess Excess taneous taneous Routed Excess Excess taneous taneou8 Routed Total
Precip Precip Runoff Runoff Runoff Precip Precip Runoff Runoff Runoff Runoff
I Time R Rc Qi Vc Qr R Rc Qi Vc Qr Q
(hrs) (in) (in) (cts) (eu tt) (ets) (in) (in) (cfs) (eu ft) (cfs) (ds)
[9.50J 0.0440 2.7365 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0438 2.5060 0.0304 1044 0.0304 0.0304
[9.67] 0.0440 2.7805 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0438 2.5498 0.0304 1063 0.0304 0.0304
I [9.83] 0.0440 2.8245 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0438 2.5935 0.0304 1081 0.0304 0.0304
(10.00J 0.0440 2.8685 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0438 2.6373 0.0304 1099 0.0304 0.0304
[10.17] 0.0440 2.9125 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0438 2.6811 0.0304 1117 0.0304 0.0304
[10.33) 0.0440 2.9565 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0438 2.7250 0.0304 1136 0.0304 0.0304
I Uo .50] 0.0440 3.0005 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0438 2.7688 0.0304 1154 0.0304 0.0304
[10.67J 0.0440 3.0445 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0438 2.8126 0.0304 1172 0.0304 0.0304
(10.83J 0.0360 3.0805 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0359 2.8484 0.0249 1187 0.0279 0.0279
[11.001 0.0360 3.1165 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0359 2.8843 0.0249 1202 0.0252 0.0252
[11.17J 0.0360 3.1525 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0359 2.9202 0.0249 1217 0.0249 0.0249
I (11.33] 0.0360 3.1885 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0359 2.9560 0.0249 1232 0.0249 0.0249
[11.50J 0.0360 3.2245 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0359 2.9919 0.0249 1247 0.0249 0.0249
[l1.67J 0.0360 3.2605 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0359 3.0278 0.0249 1262 0.0249 0.0249
[11. 83J 0.0360 3.2965 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0359 3.0636 0.0249 1277 0.0249 0.0249
[12.00J 0.0360 3.3325 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0359 3.0995 0.0249 1292 0.0249 0.0249
I [12.17] 0.0360 3.3685 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0359 3.1354 0.0249 1307 0.0249 0.0249
[12.33] 0.0360 3.4045 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0359 3.1713 0.0249 1322 0.0249 0.0249
[12.50J 0.0360 3.4405 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0359 3.2072 0.0249 1337 0.0249 0.0249
[12.67J 0.0360 3.4765 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0359 3.2430 0.0249 1351 0.0249 0.0249
[12.83] 0.0285 3.5050 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0284 3.2715 0.0197 1363 0.0226 0.0226
I [13.00] 0.0285 3.5335 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0284 3.2999 0.0197 1375 0.0200 0.0200
(13.17J 0.0285 3.5620 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0284 3.3283 0.0197 1387 0.0198 0.0198
[13 .33J 0.0285 3.5905 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0284 3.3567 0.0197 1399 0.0197 0.0197
[13.50] 0.0285 3.6190 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0284 3.3851 0.0197 1411 0.0197 0.0197
I [13.67] 0.0285 3.6475 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0284 3.4135 0.0197 1423 0.0197 0.0197
{13.83J 0.0285 3.6760 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0284 3.4420 0.0197 1434 0.0197 0.0197
(14 .00] 0.0285 3.7045 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0284 3.4704 0.0197 1446 0.0197 0.0197
[14.17J 0.0285 3.7330 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0284 3.4988 0.0197 1458 0.0197 0.0197
[14.33] 0.0285 3.7615 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0284 3.5272 0.0197 1470 0.0197 0.0197
I (14.50J 0.0285 3.7900 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0284 3.5556 0.0197 1482 0.0197 0.0197
[14 .67J 0.0285 3.8185 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0284 3.5841 0.0197 1494 0.0197 0.0197
[14.83] 0.0250 3.8435 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0249 3.6090 0.0173 1504 0.0186 0.0186
U5.00) 0.0250 3.8685 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0249 3.6339 0.0173 1514 0.0174 0.0174
[15.17] 0.0250 3.8935 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0249 3.6589 0.0173 1525 0.0173 0.0173
I [15.33] 0.0250 3.9185 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0249 3.6838 0.0173 1535 0.0173 0.0173
[15.501 0.0250 3.9435 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0249 3.7087 0.0173 1546 0.0173 0.0173
[15.67J 0.0250 3.9685 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0249 3.7337 0.0173 1556 0.0173 0.0173
US.83] 0.0250 3.9935 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0249 3.7586 0.0173 1566 0.0173 0.0173
I [16.001 0.0250 4.0185 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0249 3.7836 0.0173 1577 0.0173 0.0173
(16.17) 0.0250 4.0435 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0249 3.8085 0.0173 1587 0.0173 0.0173
(16.33) 0.0250 4.0685 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0249 3.8334 0.0173 1597 0.0173 0.0173
[16.50) 0.0250 4.0935 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0249 3.8584 0.0173 1608 0.0173 0.0173
[16.67] 0.0250 4.1185 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0249 3.8833 0.0173 1618 0.0173 0.0173
I {16.83] 0.0215 4.1400 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0215 3.9048 0.0149 1627 0.0162 0.0162
[17.00] 0.0200 4.1600 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0200 3.9247 0.0139 1636 0.0145 0.0145
[17.17J 0.0200 4.1800 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0200 3.9447 0.0139 1644 0.0139 0.0139
[17.33] 0.0200 4.2000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0200 3.9646 0.0139 1652 0.0139 0.0139
(17.50] 0.0200 4.2200 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0200 3.9846 0.0139 1660 0.0139 0.0139
I [17.67J 0.0200 4.2400 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0200 4.0046 0.0139 1669 0.0139 0.0139
[17.83J 0.0200 4.2600 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0200 4.0245 0.0139 1677 0.0139 0.0139
[18.00] 0.0200 4.2800 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0200 4.0445 0.0139 1685 0.0139 0.0139
(18.17] 0.0200 4.3000 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0200 4.0644 0.0139 1694 0.0139 0.0139
[18.33J 0.0200 4.3200 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0200 4.0844 0.0139 1702 0.0139 0.0139
I [18.50J 0.0200 4.3400 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0200 4.1044 0.0139 1710 0.0139 0.0139
[18.67] 0.0200 4.3600 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0200 4.1243 0.0139 1719 0.0139 0.0139
(18.83] 0.0200 4.3800 0.0000 0 0.0000 0.0200 4.1443 0.0139 1727 0.0139 0.0139
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Time
(hrs)
I
[19.00]
[19.17]
(19.33)
[19.50]
[19.67]
(19.83]
(20.00)
[20.17)
[20.33)
[20.50)
[20.67]
(20.83)
[21. 00)
[21.17)
(21.33]
[21. 50]
[21.67)
[21.83)
(22.00)
(22.17]
[22.33)
[22.50)
(22.67]
(22.83]
(23.00)
[23.17)
[23.33]
[23.50)
(23.67)
[23.83]
[24.00]
[24.17]
(24.33)
[24.50)
(24.67)
[24.83]
[25.00]
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
PROJECT; Seaborne Services, Inc., 247 Franks Lane
Generation of Postdeve1opment Runoff Hydrograph _ Santa Barbara Urban Hydrograph Method
25 yr storm (A)
Pervious Portion of Basin
-------------------------------------------
Pervious Area '"'
Runoff Curve Number, en *
Time of Concentrat'n, Tc ..
Pot'l Max Nat'l Det'n. S .
Routing Coefficient, W ..
a sq ft
O.OOOOAc
100
6 min
0.0000 in
0.4545
-------------------------------------------
Cumulative
Excess Excess
Precip Precip
R Rc
{in} (in)
0.0200
0.0200
0.0200
0.0200
0.0200
0.0200
0.0200
0.0200
0.0200
0.0200
0.0200
0.0200
0.0200
0.0200
0.0200
0.0200
0.0200
0.0200
0.0200
0.0200
0.0200
0.0200
0.0200
0.0200
0.0200
0.0200
0.0200
0.0200
0.0200
0.0200
0.0200
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
5.0000
4.4000
4.4200
4.4400
4.4600
4.4800
4.5000
4.5200
4.5400
4.5600
4.5800
4.6000
4.6200
4.6400
4.6600
4.6800
4.7000
4.7200
4.7400
4.7600
4.7800
4.8000
4.8200
4.8400
4.8600
4.8800
4.9000
4.9200
4.9400
4.9600
4.9800
5.0000
5.0000
5.0000
5.0000
5.0000
5.0000
5.0000
CUmulative
Instan- Instan-
taneous taneous
Runoff Runoff
Qi Vc
(cfs) (cu ft)
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Max _
Routed
Runoff
Or
(cfs)
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
o.ooao
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Qpeak _
Vtotal ..
0.1454 cfs
1985 cu ft
Impervious Portion of Basin
-------------------------------------------
Impervious Area _
Runoff CUrve NUmber. en _
Time of Concentrat'n, Tc _
Pot'l Max Nat'l Det'n, S
Routing Coefficient, w ..
5000.688 sq ft
0.1148 Ac
98.0
6 min
0.2041 in
0.4545
-------------------------------------------
CUmulative
Excess Excess
Precip Precip
R Rc
(in) (in)
0.0200
0.0200
0.0200
0.0200
0.0200
0.0200
0.0200
0.0200
0.0200
0.0200
0.0200
0.0200
0.0200
0.0200
0.0200
0.0200
0.0200
0.0200
0.0200
0.0200
0.0200
0.0200
0.0200
0.0200
0.0200
0.0200
0.0200
0.0200
0.0200
0.0200
0.0200
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
4.7632
4.1642
4.1842
4.2041
4.2241
4.2441
4.2640
4.2840
4.3040
4.3239
4.3439
4.3638
4.3838
4.4038
4.4237
4.4437
4.4637
4.4836
4.5036
4.5236
4.5435
4.5635
4.5835
4.6034
4.6234
4.6434
4.6633
4.6833
4.7033
4.7232
4.7432
4.7632
4.7632
4.7632
4.7632
4.7632
4.7632
4.7632
CUmulative
Instan- Instan-
taneous taneou$
Runoff Runoff
01 Ve
(cfs) (eu ft)
0.0139
0.0139
0.0139
0.0139
0.0139
0.0139
0.0139
0.0139
0.0139
0.0139
0.0139
0.0139
0.0139
0.0139
0.0139
0.0139
0.0139
0.0139
0.0139
0.0139
0.0139
0.0139
0.0139
0.0139
0.0139
0.0139
0.0139
0.0139
0.0139
0.0139
0.0139
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
3.3082
1735
1744
1752
1760
1769
1777
1785
1794
1802
1810
1819
1827
1835
1843
1852
1860
1868
1877
1885
1893
1902
1910
1918
1927
1935
1943
1952
1960
1968
1977
1985
1985
1985
1985
1985
1985
1985
max _
Routed
Runoff
Or
(cis)
0.0139
0.0139
0.0139
0.0139
0.0139
0.0139
0.0139
0.0139
0.0139
0.0139
0.0139
0.0139
0.0139
0.0139
0.0139
0.0139
0.0139
0.0139
0.0139
0.0139
0.0139
0.0139
0.0139
0.0139
0.0139
0.0139
0.0139
0.0139
0.0139
0.0139
0.0139
0.0076
0.0007
0.0001
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.1454
Total
Runoff
o
(cfs)
0.0139
0.0139
0.0139
0.0139
0.0139
0.0139
0.0139
0.0139
0.0139
0.0139
0.0139
0.0139
0.0139
0.0139
0.0139
0.0139
0.0139
0.0139
0.0139
0.0139
0.0139
0.0139
0.0139
0.0139
0.0139
0.0139
0.0139
0.0139
0.0139
0.0139
0.0139
0.0076
0.0007
0.0001
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.1454