HomeMy WebLinkAboutLog070
<!A"6C f!.E:'l'~ ~\€:S - ~ \ \Ft'N"1\) ~\t::.:E" ~M...'-'ND ~ 12-/'2.-1~:s- JWr-.
· Road construction drawings are not usually part of preliminary plat to be
recorded.
· Long Plat
o Need Title block: "Proposed Preliminary Plat (p7 -12)
o Add case numbers to Title Page: MLA05-00286/ SUB05-00022
o Confused by format: which pages are part of the proposed preliminary
plat? If all, them need reconfiguration of information, signature on first
page, etc. If only P-x pages, them need some info moved to those pages.
· ESA's
o Wetlands
· Buffers and wetland categories not depicted on plat
. ID wetland buffer limit west of delineated wetland.
. A-I = 150'; B-ill = 50'; C-IV=25'
. Either need to propose wetland buffer averaging (only
reduce 25%) or show cannot do averaging. Then buffer
reduction becomes available. See 3.6.9 wetlands
o Wildlife report identifies mitigation measures
· 150-foot buffer not depicted on preliminary plat
· Mapped type 5 streams not addressed in wildlife report and not
shown on preliminary plat: Ask Ross Goodwin to make
determination if they don't believe the type 5's are there.
. I left him a message Oct 2005 - no response
· Not sure where "Type 3 water" came from as mentioned in
Wildlife Report. It's a type 4 stream and a category I wetland.
o Landslide Hazard Areas and buffers not depicted on preliminary plat and
no accompanying geotech report. Need addendum that addresses plat as
proposed.
o Flood Hazard: not identified on preliminary plat
~Seismic: any work in those areas? Check UDC for req's
~Susc Aquifer:
~oastal SIPZ
· PRRD
o Reserve Tract needs to be identified on preliminary plat: need 65%, and
dedicated 76.9% in table, so okay per amount if matches dedication on
plat
o 40 lots plus 8 bonus: okay if get bonus density approved
o Meadows to Baker to Ridge don't meet 600 feet horizontally. Requires
600 lineal feet per UDC 3.6. 13.3.d. Please show how they meet this
requirement at nearest points.
o "Site Plan shall include a table providing the following. . .." Make sure
this is located on a page within the preliminary plat. See p 3-45.
o Proposed residential use not identified on the table. All SFR? Also
doesn't match map: "18 in Ridge and 14 in Baker", but I show 20 in Ridge
and 12 hi Baker.
· 20 foot front setback
\\permitserver\home\permit\stacieh\Cases\Subdivision\Disco Bay Golf Club1tQ& ITEM
review_12-2005.doc #- ~ 'Q
Paa~ 'of z...,
""... ...... ---!.-.....: - -
. ..
· Need copy of proposed CC&R's
~ ,-,li;S",,::;:-:::_..d
:Ii lOG ITEM
'<._4_ ?J~
,,""t " :-1'"
"'~;J .~.._?- ~of ~.
--
\\permitserver\home\permit\stacieh\Cases\Subdivision\Disco Bay Golf Club_prelim
review _12-2005.doc