HomeMy WebLinkAboutLog005
e
e
Page 1 of 1
Barbara Nightingale
From: AI Scalf
Sent: Wednesday, May 03, 2006 5:02 PM
To: 'LewisHale@aol.com'; Barbara Nightingale
Subject: RE: Meeting with PLA
Lewis
They can of course apply for the amendment. Now, the court case...hum? I would expect David Alvarez to
comment on this issue as part of his legal review of the proposed development agreement amendment. We will
address it in our staff report. I would expect the BOCC to ask about it as well. And it will be part of the public
comments submitted.
You are a character...not swampy
have a good day
AI
-----Original Message-----
From: LewisHale@aol.com [mailto:LewisHale@aol.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 03,20062:47 PM
To: AI Scalf; Barbara Nightingale
Subject: Re: Meeting with PLA
AI, thanks so gather it has nothing unique to the nature of their request. I would be curious to know
your thoughts on how the county can entertain this given the pending suit filed by PLA?
It must be abundently clear that they are taking this approach since they have a very low chance of
overturning Galt's decision. The RCW requires an initial hearing on their suit within 31 to 55 days of
filing and a hearing within 60 days. They filed in Dec and we haven't even had the initial hearing yet
and in fact don't even have a date set. This means that if they really wanted this could have been to
trial and a decison rendered by now, so their claims of time saving are, shall we say, without merit.
And hello Barbara and welcome aboard! I look forward to meeting. Did AI tell you how deep the
swamp is at Port Ludlow' and the cast of characters, including me, that crawl out of it?:-)
Regards,
Lewis
LOG !J.EM
# .i. r-
-v f
Page 0._
7/712006