HomeMy WebLinkAboutLog033
-
e
Page 1 of 2
.,
..
Barbara Nightingale
From: Powers & Therrien [powers_therrien@yvn.com]
Sent: Friday, June 09,200610:40 AM
To: AI Scalf
Cc: Powers & Therrien; Barbara Nightingale
Subject: Re: Amendment to Development Agreement
AI:
I want to be sure I understand the procedure. As I read LUPO, Sec. 19, a Type C deicision is first submitted to a
hearing examiner for a recommendation and then the result is submitted to the BoCC for final decision. Is there a
formal hearing before the hearing examiner? Is the hearing examiner's recommendation circulated for comment
to interested parties before it is submitted to the BoCC? Is the only appeal from the BoCC an appeal under LUPA
or to the SHB? What happens to PLA's pending motion for reconsideration before the SHB and its pending LUPA
petition? Should these be dismissed since their results may conflict the results of the new consolidated permit
application? Is SEPA implicated in the proposal because it changes the original proposal subject to separate
SEPA compliance?
I am simply not conversant with the procedure. Let me know if you would. Also, please place me on the mailing
list for notice provided by LUPO Sec. 13C1 a and provide me a copy of any subsequent filings of any SSDP or
application for an SSDP with the DOE.
Finally, could you send me a fax or email copy of the complete SSDP application that is associated with the
proposed amendment to the development agreement?
Thanks for your help. .
Les
----- Original Message -----
From: AI Scalf
To: LewisHale@aol.com ; powers therrien@yvn.com ; Barbara Nightingale
Cc: Roseann Carroll ; evz@cablespeed.com
Sent: Friday, June 09, 2006 10:11 AM
Subject: RE: Amendment to Development Agreement
Lewis
This has been a moving target. We have received a shoreline permit application. So that is a type A, and will
be consolidated with the type C, so everything is a type C. We should have a process chart for all of this by the
end of next week.
AI
-----Original Message-----
From: LewisHale@aol.com [mailto:LewisHale@aol.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2006 3:48 PM
To: AI Scalf; powers therrien@yvn.com; Barbara Nightingale
Cc: Roseann Carroll; evz@cablespeed.com
Subject: Re: Amendment to Development Agreement
AI, thanks for the update. It would be helpful if you could set out how the process will proceed, Le.
(1) after the comment period approx when the public hearing would be held and (2) presuming
that either the community or TrendwestlPLA will appeal whatever drCiSiQ~ trr~ makes what
_OC. ....
#S.2~..-~-._,,-
71712006 Page.__f___",.ot._2:-