HomeMy WebLinkAboutLog075
e
e
Page 1 of3
Barbara Nightingale
...
From: Leslie Locke
Sent: Friday, July 21, 20068:28 AM
To: AI Scalf; Barbara Nightingale
Subject: FW: Proposed Trendwest Amendment
From: Tom Stone[SMTP:TSTONE@cABLESPEED.cOM]
Sent: Thursday, July 20, 20068:36:01 PM
To: Pat Rodgers; Phil Johnson; David Sullivan
Subject: FW: Proposed Trendwest Amendment
Auto forwarded by a Rule
Please enter this e-mail into your record for Trendwest.
What was sent from Elizabeth Van Zonneveld of Port Ludlow
Village Council was very flawed and did not represent the
majority of the Council.
Warm regards
Thomas Stone
95 Red Cedar Lane
Port Ludlow, WA
(360) 437-4108
From: Tom Stone [mailto:tstone@cablespeed.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 7:51 AM
To: 'Allen Panasuk'; 'Bruce Pyles'; 'Burt Loomis'; 'Don Clark'; 'Dwayne Wilcox'; 'Elizabeth Van Zonneveld'; 'Larry
Nobles'; 'Ralph Stroy'; 'Terry OBrian(LMC)'; 'Tom McCay'; 'Tom Stone'; 'Tony Durham'
Subject: FW: Proposed Trendwest Amendment
Elizabeth, the letter that you sent to the county certainly
contained a lot more negative information than what the Board
approved.
All that was to be sent was "At the last General Meeting of the
Council, held July 6, 2006, the Council voted to communicate formally
to you that we question the use of a contractual document such as the
Development Agreement as a means to change zoning designations."
7/21/2006
G (r:r:~ rrc.:M
(J_ir .... 37
,,(..
e
e
Page 2 of3
This PL VC Board did not chopped or approved the letter that
y~u sent.
Using a statement that says "refused to adopt CC&R's that were similar...."
has to be misleading as I'm now told that their CC&Rs are more
stringent than ours! Is that true? If so, why tell the county that we don't
like their CC&Rs?
The PLVC Board did not say "Allowing this means ofre-zoning may have
serious property value implications not only in Port Ludlow under this
Development Agreement but county-wide as well."
Is this really true or your opinion? It's not my opinion.
Lastly, where did the closing sentence come from? "carefully consider
our concern in this matter. We believe that the Commission should consider
that this decision might have great impact..."
I think a second letter should be sent to the same addees and that
this first misleading letter be cancelled and pulled from the official
correspondence files. Then I suggest you add what the PLVC did
approve,i.e., "At the last General Meeting of the
Council, held July 6, 2006, the Council voted to communicate formally
to you that we question the use of a contractual document such as the
Development Agreement as a means to change zoning designations."
Request other PLVC members send your comments.
Regards
Tom Stone
From: Elizabeth Van Z [mailto:evz@cablespeed.com]
Sent: Monday, July 17, 2006 9:30 PM
To: John Fischbach; Phil Johnson; David Sullivan; Pat Rodgers
Cc: AI Scalf; Barbara Nightingale; 'Tony Durham'; Tom Stone; Tom McCay; Ralph Stroy; Larry Nobles; Elizabeth
Van Zonneveld; Dwayne Wilcox,; Don Clark; Bruce Schmitz; Bert Loomis; Bruce Pyles; Glee Hubbard; Allen
Panasuk; Peter Joseph; John Van Zonneveld; John Golden; Jim Brannaman; Howard Slack; Gary Moore; Frank
Siler; Francis Wickeham; Doug Herring
Subject: Proposed Trendwest Amendment
Mr. Fischbach and Commissioners,
Attached is a letter from the Port Ludlow Village
Council concerning the amendment to
7/21/2006
e
Page 3 of3
e
the PLAlBoCC Development Agreement. I am sending a signed copy of our letter to you by
regular mail.
..
Sincerely,
Elizabeth Van Zonneveld, President
PLVC
7/21/2006