HomeMy WebLinkAboutLog110
e
e
Page 1 of2
,;
Barbara Nightingale
From: Barbara Nightingale
Sent: Friday, July 21, 20062:26 PM
To: 'Powers & Therrien'
Cc: AI Scalf
Subject: RE: Ludlow Cove 2
Les,
I agree that you are making this more complicated than it needs to be. The notice out there now is only the notice
of application. Your comment will be on the proposed project not necessarily the MONS at this time. The
application is a consolidated application on the SSDP and the proposed amendment. The WDFW permit (HPA) is
separate. That is the permit WDFW has jurisdiction over. We are not seeking comments on their permit. I cannot
limit your comments on this project. I recommend that you summarize or list your comments on this proposed
condominium proposed, for Tract E, and submit them to this office before the deadline.
Thanks,
Barbara Nightingale M.MA, MAS.
Associate Planner
Port Ludlow Master Planned Resort
Jefferson County
Dept. of Community Development
(360) 379-4472
bnightingale@co.iefferson.wa.us
From: Powers & Therrien [mailto:powers_therrien@yvn.com]
Sent: Friday, July 21, 2006 1:58 PM
To: Barbara Nightingale
Cc: Powers & Therrien
Subject: Re: Ludlow Cove 2
Barbara:
I hate to be obtuse. I appear to be losing track. The letter to reviewer appears to address the MONS supported
by the Staffs initial report. It covers a master permit application referring to building permit and SSDP. It also
covers a JARPA that has not been filed. Does the July 24, 2006 deadline apply only to the closing of the record
for purposes of the proposed MONS or does it close the record over all of the covered permit applications? The
problem I see is that the letter makes reference to later review of the SSDP and JARPA, apparently, under the
10callCAO and Program. I would not be surprised to see conditions attached to the JARPA permit. My
understanding is that WFW is sensitive about this project as well as the major revision. Shouldn't these precede
the SSDP application? I viewed the attached site and other plans. They appear to be limited to the SSDP. How
substantively are they integrated into the binding site plan that would apply to the project as a whole? Is there
simply an assumption that the same binding site plan continues to apply? I can't see how this could be the case
when the final action by Jefferson County denied the binding site plan. Perhaps I am making my own confusion.
However, I would appreciate some guidance as to those matters that must be addressed by July 24th.
Thanks for your patience.
Les
----- Original Message -----
From: Barbara Nightingale
To: Powers & Therrien
# /ff ITEM
Page I of .J-
8/7/2006
e
e
Page 2 of2
,--
t
Sent: Friday, July 21,2006 11 :56 AM
Subject: RE: Ludlow Cove 2
Les,
Comment letters are not limited to SEPA. Actually another SEPA notice will go out with the notice of public
hearing. The only proposed amendment is to the Port Ludlow Development Agreement (Amendment I).
Barbara Nightingale M.MA, MAS.
Associate Planner
Port Ludlow Master Planned Resort
Jefferson County
Dept. of Community Development
(360) 379-4472
bnightingale@co.iefferson.wa.us
From: Powers & Therrien [mailto:powers_therrien@yvn.com]
Sent: Friday, July 21, 2006 9:51 AM
To: Barbara Nightingale
Cc: Powers & Therrien
Subject: Ludlow Cove 2
Barbara:
I started review of the June 23, 2006 letter to reviewers on MLA06-00221. There appears to be an
inconsistency between the subject matter of the amendment described therein and that described in the
public notice. The public notice, I believe correctly, describes a proposed amendment to the
development plan. The letter describes a proposed amendment to the existing Port Ludlow Master
Planned Resort Code (MPR Code). I did not see a separate "amendment" in the attachment to the
letter. Am I correct that there is only one proposed amendment and that it is to the development
agreement and not the MPR Code?
Also, could you clarify whether the comments that are solicited in the letter respond to SEP A only?
This appears to be the case since reference is made to a modified determination of nonsignificance.
Let me know if I need to address any issues other than SEP A. I understand that those comments are
due Monday, July 24, 2006.
Thanks for your assistance.
Les Powers
POWERS & THERRIEN, P .S.
3502 Tieton Drive
Yakima, W A 98902
Phone (509) 453-8906
Fax (509) 453-0745
This email is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 V.S.C. Section 2510-2521 and is legally
privileged. This message and any attachments hereto may contain confidential information intended only for the use ofthe
individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient(s), or the employee or agent responsible for delivery
of this message to the intended recipient(s), you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this
email message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify the sender and
delete this email from your computer.
8/7/2006