HomeMy WebLinkAboutLog141
-
.
Page 1 of 1
Barbara Nightingale
From: David Alvarez
Sent: Thursday, August 10, 20068:27 AM
To: Barbara Nightingale; AI Scalf
Subject: RE: Quesiton-Hearing Examiner Scope
I will give Barb a phone call on this matter. David A
From: Barbara Nightingale
Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2006 8:24 AM
To: David Alvarez; AI Scalf
Subject: Quesiton-Hearing Examiner Scope
David and AI,
Please see page 14 of 19 of the PLDA Decision procedures. It is my interpretation that it the Development
Agreement states that as a Type C, the BoCC may refer the application (which in this case is a consolidated
application for amendment and shoreline permit) to the HE for an open record hearing. The BoCC has done this
and this is why we tend to see him as hearing both.
However, I can see where there is a question because Type C definitely refers to a "land use application" - is this
where the question comes in as to whether the HE hears the legislative decision (i.e. amendment)? Is the
amendment not really a land use application?
Barbara Nightingale M.MA, MAS.
Associate Planner
Port Ludlow Master Planned Resort
Jefferson County
Dept. of Community Development
(360) 379-4472
bnig b1[ngg!J~_@GQj~JfeI~on. WCiJ,J;l
LOG ITEM
# /1.(1
Page I of /
9/13/2006