HomeMy WebLinkAboutWetland Delineation 821073010
\
Wiltermood
Associates, Inc.
~LflDIO -4f03
. Sb-P()&J-t7~
November3,2004
RECEIVED.
SEP 112lJOO
Jonathan & Laura Storm
2943 Beaver Valley Road
Port Ludlow,.WA 98365
JHffRSON COUNfY oeo
Re: Wetland Delineation and Categorization for -3.5 acres (PafClil No. 821073010) at
2943 Beaver Valley Road, Port Ludlow, Jefferson County, Washington. The
property is located in the NW 14, SW y., of Section 7, Township 28 North, Range 1
West,W.M.'
Dear Jonathan and Laura:
. The subject parcel was investigated on October 28, 2004. The purpose of this site
investigation was to identify and delineate regulated wetlands, and determine the wetland
category and wetland buffer requirements as defined by the Jefferson County Vnified
Development Code. The project proposal is to construct a single family residence on the
subject parcel. The proposed building site is west of ihe ex.isting mobile home. A
Category II wetland was identified in the western portion of the parcel... The wetland is part
of a large off-site wetland system associated with Ludlow Creek that flows south to Port
Ludlow Bay.
A wetland delineation was completed on October 28, 2003. This letter was prepared to .
describe our fmdings and any potential current regulatory implications of these findings on
the proposed project. It illcludes a detailed description of the data conected to support the
on.site wetland delineation and supporting documentation from the Jefferson County Soil
Survey and National Wetlands Inventory. This delineation was completed using the
Department of Ecology Washington State Wetlands Identification and Delineation Manual
(Publication 96.94), in accordance with the Jefferson County Unified Development Code,
Section 3.6.9. This manual requires the use of the three-wetland parameters of wetland
hydrology, hydrophytic vegetation, and hydric soils to make wetland. determinations and an
1015 s.w. HarDcr Road, Port Orchard, Washinl!ton 98367 (360) 876.2403 Fax (360) 876-2053
,
.,
RE('1E~VED
Storm
November 3,2004
Page 2
SEP 1. 1. 20U6
JEfffRSON COUNlYOCn
three must be present for an area under .normal circumstances to be considered wetland.
The Routine On-site Determination Method was used. todeterII1ine the presence .or absence
of these parameters because the site is currently under normal circumstances.
SITE DESCRIPTION
The site consists of a rectangular shaped, '-3.5 acre parcel located at2943 Beaver Valley
Road, Port Ludlow , W A. The site slopes gradually down toward a Category II wetland in
. the western portion of the property. . The wetland extends off-site to the west and is part of
. .
a large wetland system associated with Ludlow Creek.. A stream enters the property north
of the driveway, flows north in the roadside ditch and then turns west near the northeast
corner and continues along the northern property line, eventually flowing into Ludlow
Creek and south to Ludlow Bay. The stream is a Type 5 in the eastern portion of the parcel
turning into a Type 4 stream the remaining on-site portion. Per Al Latham, Jefferson
County Conservation District Manager, Ludlow Creek has a natural fish barrier about 200
yards up from Ludlow Bay and the stream, above this blockage, is not a known salmon
bearing stream. Past use of the property appears to be grazing as evidenced by 1988 photos
supplied by the landowner. The on-site portion of the wetland is now dominated by
hardhack and Reed canary grass. The vegetation on the remaining portion of the parcel is
dominated by pasture grasses. The landowners have planted many trees on the property; a
row of cottonwood along the stream and Sitka spruce, Western red cedar and Douglas fir
trees and others mainly in the southwest portion of the property. An existing single-wide
mobile home is in the southeast corneL An existing shop is located north of this home.
JEFFERSON COUNTY SOIL SURVEY
The on-site soils are mapped as CfC Cassolary sandy loam, 0-15% slopes along the eastern
section, StB Swantown gravelly sandy loam, 0-8% slopes in the central section and Mu
MukiIteo peat in a small area in the western section, according to the Soil Conservation
Service, Soil Survey for Jefferson County Area, Washington, August 1975. Cassolaryand
RECE[VED
. Storm
November 3, 2004
Page 3
SEP 1J 20D6
JEffERSON LOUNlY OW.
Swantown are not classified as hydric and do not have inclusions of hydric soil. Mukilteo
is classified as hydric. See enclosed map with site located soil survey and the enclosed soil..
descriptions.
NATIONAL WETLANDS INVENTORY.
The US Fish and Wildlife. Service, National Wetlands Inventory (NWI), Port Ludlow
Quadrangle indicates the presence of a Palustrine, Scrub Shrub,Seasoria1ly flooded (PSSC)
wetland on the eastern portion of the parceL The NWI also indicates .extensive wetlands
. .
west of the parcel that run north and south in the valley. . A Palustrine, Open. Water,
Permanently flooded (POWH) wetland west oftheparce1 appearS to have been converted
and used as a farm pond with a dam on the southern edge. See enclosed map for site
located on the NW(
SITE FINDINGS
Eight test plots were completed in the westemhalf of the parcel (see enclosed site map) to.
verify the presence or absence of wetland conditions and confirm the boundary delineation.
At each test plot, the soils were examined for the presence of hydric soil conditions and
evidence of hydroiogic conditions occurring e.ither in the test hole or on the surface of the
.soil. In addition, the percent cover of the dominant plant species within a 15-foot radius
was recorded at each test hole. A summary of the data findings are provided in this letter.
. The summary includes a description of the soil prof1Ies, any evidence of hydrology seen at
the test sites, and the dominant plant species. See enclosed data forms for additional
information concerning the data collected at the individual test plots and enclosed map for.
test plot locations.
Storm
November 3,2004
Page 4 .
RECEi,rED
SEP 11 2006
JHffASON WUNlY Den
TEST PLOT DATA
Test plot #1 is located in upland east of the wetland. The vegetation is dominated by
Kentucky bluegrass (Poa pratensis) F AC with lower percentages of tall fescue (Festuca
arzmdincea) FAC-, Orchard grass,(Dactylis glomerata) FACU and horsetail (Equisetum
arvense) FAC. The soil hole revealed a two layer profile consisting of 8 inch sandy loam .
surface horizon (0~8") having a matrix chroina of 10 YR 2/2 with no mottles and a sandy
loam subsurface horizon (8-16") having a matrix chroma of 10 YR4/2 with 10 YR 4/6
mottles. There was no hydrology present dU.ing the field Visit and no evidence of wetland
hydroiogy either on the surface or in the soil profile.
.. .
Test Plot #2 is located in. the wetland west of Test Plot #1 on the edge of the hardhack~ The
vegetation is dominated by hardhack (Spiraea douglasil) FACW, Kentucky bluegrass (Poa
pratensis) FAC, and horsetail (Equlsetum arvense) FAC: The soil hole revealed a two
layer profile consisting of a 12 inch sandy loam surface horizon (OcI2") having a matrix
chroma of 10 YR 3/1 and a sandy loam subsurface horizon (12-16") having a matrix
. chroma of 10 YR 4/2 with 10 YR 4/6 mottles, The soil was sanirated to the surface.
Test Plot #3 is located in upland east of Test Plot #2; The vegetation is dominated by
Kentucky bluegrass (Poa pratensis) FAC with lower percentages of tall fescue (Festuca .
. arundincea) FAC- and Orchard grass (Dactylis glomerata) FACU. The soil hole revealed a
two layer profile consisting of an 11 inch sandy loam surface horizon (0-11") having a
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,
I
.. .
matrix chroma of lOYR 3/3 and a sandy loam subsurface horizon (11-16") having a matrix
chroma of 10 YR 5/2 with 10 YR 4/6 mottles. There was no hydrology present during the
field visit and no evidence of wetland hydrology either on the surface or in the soil profile.
Test Plot #4 is located in upland north of Test Plot #1 and just east of the wetland
boundary. The vegetation is dominated by soft rush (Juncus effusus) FACW, and horsetail
(Equisetum arvense) FAC with lower percentages of Kentucky bluegrass (Poa pratensis)
FAC and Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense) FACU. The soil hole revealed a two layer
RECEIVED
Storm
November 3, 2004
Page 5
SEP 1 i 2006
JEffERSON COUNlY DeD
profile consisting of an 8 inch sandy loam surface horiron (0-8") having a matrix chioma of
10 YR 2/2 with no mottling and a loamy sand subsurface horizon (8-16") having a matrix
chroma of 10 YR 5/1. The soil was saturated to the surface.
. .
. ..
Test Plot #5 is located iri upland north of Test Plot #4. Thevegetatiori is dominated by reed
canary grass (Phalaris.arundinacea) FACW. The soil hole revealed a single layer.profile
consisting of a 16 inch sandy ioiun.(O-16") having a matrix chroma of 10 YR2/2 with DO
mottles. There was no hydrology present during the field visit and no evidence of wetland
hydrology either on the surface or in the soil profile..
Test Plot #6 is located in the wetland west of Test Plot #5.. The vegetation is dominated by
. reed canary grass (Phalaris arundinacea) FACW, hardhack (Spiraea douglasil)FACW and
horsetail (Equisetum arvense) FAC: The soil hole revealed a single layer profile consisting
of 16 inch silt loam (~16") having a IIiatrix chroma of 10 YR 2/1. The soil was saturated
with water to the surface with water in the test holeat8 inches.
Test Plot #7 is located in the wetland at the southwest comer. The vegetation is dominated
by reed canary grass (Phalaris arundinacea) FACW, horsetail (Equisetum arvense) FAC,
and creeping buttercup (Ranunculus repens) FACW. The soil hoil~ revealed a single layer
profile consisting of 16 inchsiltIoam(O-16") having a matrix chroma of 10 YR 2/1. The
soil was saturated with water to the surface with water seeping into the lest holeat 7 inches.
Test Plot #8 is located in the upland area east of Test Plot #7. The vegetation is dominated
by horsetail (Equisetum arvense) FAC, creeping buttercup (Ranunculus repens) FACW,
and mowed grass (appeared to be Kentucky bluegrass and tall fesclle) with lower
percentages of reed canary grass (Phalaris arundinacea) F ACW, red alder (Alnus rubra)
FAC, black cottonwood (Populus balsamifera) FAC, and planted, young Douglas fir
(Pseudotsuga menziesii) FACU, Western red cedar (Thuja plica/a) FAC and Sitka spruce
(Picea sitchensis) F AC trees. The soil hole revealed a two layer profIle consisting of a 10
:,.(
RECEKVED
Storm
November 3, 2004
Page 6
S[? 112006
JHHRSON CUUNlY Den
inch sandy loam surface horizon (0-10") having a matrix chroma of 10 YR 212with no
mottles and a loamy sand subsurface horizon (10~16") having a: matrix chroma of 10 YR
. .. . .
5/2 with no mottles. The;e was no hydrology present during the field visit and no evidence
ohvetland hydrology either on the surface or in the soil profile.
WETLAND DETERMINATION
The areas sampled at Test Plots 1, 3, 4,.5,and. 8 do not meet the wetland criteria because
there is only one positive indicator (hydrophytic vegetation) present for of the three wetland.
parameters. The areas sampled at Test Plots 2, 6,4, and 7 are determined to be wetland
because there are. positive indicators present for all three wetland parameters. The
hydrology in Test Plot areas 2, 4, 6, and 7 is from groundwater and seepage and flows west
and southwest.
The delineated wetland is part of a large wetland system that is associated with Ludlow
Creek. Ludlow Creek flows south to Ludlow Bay. . The subject parcel is approximately
. , three miles upstream from the bay. . The wetland system appears to have experienced past
. farming and grazing disturbances but, in areas where these practices have ceased, the
wetland vegetation is converting back to scrub shrub and forested.
WETLAND CATEGORY. STREAM TYPES. & REGULATORY IMPLICATIONS
The category of the delineated wetland has been determined using the Department of
Ecology's Wetland Rating System for Western Washington, Second Edition, 1993. The
delineated wetland meets the criteria for a Category II wetland because it is a large, diverse
wetland system associated with a stream. Category II wetlands require 100 foot buffers
according to the Jefferson County Unified Development Code, Section 3.6.9. The stream
that flows across the northern edge of the property is a Type 5 in the eastern portion and a
Type 4 in the remaining on-site portion.
Storm
November 3,2004
Page 7
RJErrEllvg If)
SEP 112006
JHftRSON COUNlY OeD
Type 5 streams require a 50 foot buffer and Type 4 streams require a 100 foot buffer
according to the Jefferson County Unified Development Code; Section 3.6.8.g. See the.
. .
attached Jefferson County Unified Development Code, Sections 3.6.8 and 3.6.9.
PROJECT PROPOSAL
. . .
The project proposal is to construct a single family residence and install.a new septic
. system. The residence will be located west of the existing single wide mobile home. The
septic system perk holes are currently being tested in three locations but tIie septic system.
will be north,east or south of the proposed building site. The proposed building site and
septic locations are well outSide the wetland and stream buffers as shown on the attached .
. .
rough drawing. The vegetation in tIiis area is pasture grasses so no significant vegetation
removal will occur. The landowners have planted trees along the stream and wetland to
improve buffer conditions and have stated the desire to continue to improve buffer
conditions with additional plantings. There sbould be no significant adverse impacts to the .
wetland and stream as aresult of home construction ~n the proposed location.
SUMMARY.
This -3.5 acre property is located 2943 Beaver Valley Road, Port Ludlow, Jefferson
County, Washington. A Category II wetland was identified in the western edge of the
property. The wetland is part of a large, off-site wetland system associated with a tributary
of Ludlow Creek. This tributary has no known fish use. A 100. foot buffer is required for
Category II wetlands. A Type 5 turning into a Type 4 stream flows across the northern
property line. Type 5 stream requires a 50 foot buffer and a Type 4 stream requires a 100
foot buffer. A single family residence is proposed for the eastern portion of the parcel and
just west of the existing mobile home. The proposed building site is well outside the
wetland and stream buffers. There will be no significant negative impact to the wetland and
stream as a result of construction of the residence in the proposed location.
Storm
November 3,2004
Page 8 ..
. If you have any additional questl~ns or concerns, please feel free to contact me at phone
number 360-876-2403. Thank you for the opportunity to provide this service.
Sincerely,
~ barotf>>t-
Joanne Bartlett
Professional Wetland Scientist
7.pvfltL
Teresa Lewis
. Biologist
~
Attachments
.. C'l' It; 'l\~rE D
1K..':~\ 1.dl.\ i
SEP 1120CS
JHHRSONl:OUNTY oen
SITE PHOTOS
Jonathan & Laura Storm
2943 Beaver,:alley Rd, Port Ludlow, WA
RlE('E! VE~)
Sf? 1:' 2GOS
JfffERSON COUNTI Den
Photo #1 - Looking southeast from near wetland
boundary on north side of property toward the existing
shop and residence.
Photo #2 - Looking south from the north side of the property
with the wetland, dominated by hardhack, to the west (right side
of photo)..
"":".";"'",
"' ,-' ~~~_,.. ope.n....wa.,.e.-r. 't....OI\:'_~>-,
" "" ~ ~ "'....~. '~~.' ",,<<,,~, ~
"", ~"'. "" ~ ~"", ~ ". () "-, "
"- ',.. ~' ~ C'. "
',' ~ 0 "
'----- --... 7 0' ~ ?l "'-..,.
~ -'I A~A1A~ ~ I=j "G."."'. ,"'"
r- ...00- '- A 5 _ " ~.
o ~ ) 11'1 '.' ",,"(31
~~~~~ ~.f) 01 ~3 ~~~
..c< -+..1: ~ ~ it';t) , IJ'I
... rVJ _::r ~ """ )
0\c. ? /)
~ 0-0 Vl o~ :> '-,_:-;::!-
. (b f J
C 5). .{Jr'.JJ
...-...J_ <. ~
-; <~ /'-l r
. <.~-p
N :J:>s: I ~
lla pOI'
ZJ)_-J
. 00 It> \.N (J\
7'1 w'"'C I -+
:.- If' I\J 0 0
~lJ1~a3
*'
ZZ7tl
o c ~
->- -;- G
?cY""
l1\ lI) '="
c ~ ~
<-€
-.CftlJ.
-~;?...~~
C>~~~...
r -..:. 0 V.
N llO ~ '" "-
~ ~ i"~ ,
I ~ili!=
:t e ~i ~~
~~r~ ~
:-I ~ ~ O.g
r~lO ~l:S
,.~~ 5'0
(Iii '" 0
v.' ~ S"~
~
,
\
.", "
,,~>,~,
"
'"'- ---
0~-- ~
,
JjPfr-ox. /o! I ,
~-9" 8uPler
I ,
I
" ~ /af:J.(Iq
I \AI..""... _
( ~~ OQI~
\
D~
-,..,-
s:>
~~
!~
~~
Qt
:r;:;D
() 0
I , -0
Ill' <>
if' ~
-Q
Ci's:>
~ VI
II'-r
VI C
(b ..,
lI\~
'- -'"
, ~....---
,
EXi~t-j~
rnobil~ ~M
.... Co.
,.,
%
D~
... -.
~
W>
J
~1
~I
;:;
.It $'1
.s v,
- -
- - \~50'
5tr~""'"
h"Hif
~.
~
--?
---
.-'
hM\1
61 hMH _-
I flf\-o,g - ~
hd\\I)~_-.,-
.- .
,
~U\
\~
,3
-----
------
.
R'%:t:>
c:.....-
:> -\
~;:D
~ Q..J)
-T)
.r
v-
o
-r;I
l~
1X1:c
o
A
II-
z
~
2+
J
u
,-
'-a
*t
:;f ~o
: I ~:~L,-..
I I ~ . >{
I . ~ I, -___.~ ! ~.
( i.. ,-
I ~ ~ I f
J b' I
I I It
I I I
I I,
*'- - -' ~*~
"""
4-
-
o
()
<:;; 't:
~ Q
(I 0 (j)
'" 0
~ m ~
7" I:) <
o rn
'C: ~ ..
i 1-
,
7f--*
x
..... 'cL.
"~7\
*-
~
~
-I>>
X ~~
'^
~
*'
<<:-
<<-
~
*
<:
x
/lpPr.
O~.
':/<
*
'*
*,X
,_ 1"~
(,..}
o
" '*
A<
~
*/:
.....
-- - -X
--
X:'%*
~
---
,. ."
~ ~
." "
'E
\\
/'
/
I
---=
~RL-INe
c.~,J'
--------
-
----
---
<<:-.
.,,~ \\
~r:?\
~ '"'r <<-
~>
~6
~ <:
'"ll
\fI
<:-
~
l3oul'lcJ.
4.'j
<E:
.(:
>/:
I
I
I
o~
1=
z
c;
!rl
:1
()
c
"t
o
1>
~
: os
>. <>.
" 'i'?
r
VI -i -
-I '< ?:
,. "1) '"
tr. 11\ 1'1
>-l':\J
3-
~
"-
-l
'"
~
V\
1:
~
",+
t:.....y
..
~i'
,,'"
~
"
I .,l
0<'"
J;: ,
/$'" - /
Ill'
-I
~
I~
"*
-
.,.
\~
~
'"
'V'
\
}
J
J
../
-----
..-
. ~
~ -p.VAt.J-.E.Y
. BI"./lVr::
r{WY 1'1'
pLOT PLAN
:JR .j LB 5Tof<M
21'+3 B<'AV!I<. VALLq RD
PT LvPlOlAJ tAlA '18'365
, PARceL tF 13'::2.1 073 010
Dntum b~ -JOf\O--t+.tJ...Y\. ~ LGUJ,(~ Stvf'W\
/
_ / JEFFERSON COUNTY
I. = SOIL SURVEY
~. '~~ Wiltermood Associates, Inc.
1015 SW Harper Road
r, Port Orchard, WA 98367
. (360) 876-2403 .
.--/
/
\~
FOC
EMU
':P'
\\--:\\t
/~
..........
....../'
.
.
.
,'."\ ..
.
I
l-cr\
I.
.\
i
'........... ...........
..
.
,
,
,j
b
.-+--.4 J
.
f ",,-~!
,
.
r'\
.\....., -.,
, ~-
--~'. ../
'.
PfMc.,r'OWMit -
.<
"
.,
'is
"*;.,
. \'.
.
,8
.
I
\l
\. "
11.
., u\
II II
II "
\1 '.\
II : \ "
.. f<
II \I
j ''It \ ~I
\
\ II
" \ ./,
-I
if
- ,\1
\l , .
~
_ -.s NATIONAL WETLANDS
;-;-- _ INVENTORY
~'~~ Wiltermood Associates, Inc.
1015 SW Harper Road
,! Port Orchard, W A 98367
. (360) 876-2403
JEFFERSON COUNTY SOIL SURVEY
DESCRIPTION OF SOIL TYPES
The soils described in this appendix are excerpts, considered applicable to urban
development, taken from the Soil Conservation Service, Soil Survey of Jefferson County
Area, Washington, August, 1975. For further information, see pages 13-14 of the soil
survey.
CfC Cassolarv sandy loam, 0-15 % slopes. The Cassolary soil series consists of well-drained
soils on upland terraces that formed in reworked glacial and marine sediments. Native
vegetation is mainly Douglas fir, western red cedar, western hemlock, red alder, bigleaf
maple, rhododendron, salal, huckleberry, and sword fern. Cassolary soils are associated
with Agnew, Alderwood, Clallam, Dick, Everett, Indianola, Kitsap and Tukey soils. The
Cassolary 0-15% slopes are nearly level to rolling on upland terraces where the slopes are
mostly 5 to 10%. Included in this mapping are small areas of Kitsap soil types. This soil is
well drained and the permeability is moderately slow. Runoff is slow to medium and the
hazard of water erosion is slight to moderate. This soil is used mainly for production of
trees and for recreation areas and wildlife habitat. A small acreage is used for permanent
pasture, hay and home garden crops.
StH Swantown gravelly sandy loam, 0-8% slopes. The Swantown series consists of somewhat
poorly drained, gravelly soils that have a very slowly permeable cemented layer at a depth of
18 to 24 inches. This nearly level to gently sloping soil is in lowland seep spots of terraces
along the toeslopes of moderately steep, hilly glacial terraces. This soil is somewhat poorly
drained. Permeability is moderately rapid above the cemented layer and very slow in the
cemented layer. A perched water table is at a depth of Y2 to 1 foot during the rainy season.
This soil is used mainly for production of trees and for wildlife habitat and recreation areas.
Mu Mukilteo peat. This deep, very poorly drained soil is on long, narrow, backwater
depressions of major river valleys and upland depressional areas. It formed in organic material
mostly of partly decomposed plant remains and is classified as hydric. Included with this soil
in mapping are as much as 10 percent Shalcar soils and about 2 percent Semiahmoo soils, both
are classified as hydric. Permeability ofthis Mukilteo soil is moderate and the available water
capacity is high. Runoff is ponded during the winter months, and water erosion is not a hazard
or is a slight hazard. This soil is used mainly for migratory waterfowl habitat. In undrained
areas, this soil provides ideal habitat for waterfowl, such as mallard, pintail, and wood ducks.
Seeding of water-tolerant plants helps to improve the habitat for wildlife. This soil is poorly
suited to homesites because of depth to the high water table, pinging, and subsidence. It is
unable to support a load without settling. On-site sewage disposal systems function
improperly or fail because of the high water table and ponding.
<
~}\
)~-~ %
. '.., I
~~~
.\ I,
r~-
!
c\
:~~
/.--./
"
57'30"
1. 29 N.
T 28 N.
____u"'>,
\<
) i J
1. J /
j'lf /
ill! f
I,
HVG)
~ I-
",<:
~ '"
" 0
-
5'09
,
,
)1
r.
--F
"
I
i
,/r
):>
,
i
~ I
<
~ ~l ,
0
c. :t , i
0' f
~ c. ( \:-
~
~ 'J
to
53{))
55'
t-"
"
,I
]
, /'\
"
{:;~
" ;~\
,
\,
/,/---,-......
\
,
/
j
'"
c
c
\
j }
I
,
\
.. /
t"'"~..,/
, \1. ,~...::>.
;f\" :
./ ;' \;1\
/ / \\ \,
)}; /\\\,
, j \1\.
i j ! II'
I
~-,
,
i ,
I \
I ~
I I
,J I ,
,
[
i
-,.,...
/'
. I
\.--- .
/,,'
, '
,
I
\
I
\ \
\c~\
,
'~~);!&if~" \.l~~
",l,V : . / Jrs;~nson villi
~. . -=t=1138~ ' j
~i.: ,1' I- ~'
1) \ 18 :~
,:~ -~ J \ t;, 1[' \\;
.., In, l/ f:' 0 "-1/';,\. '~
....~., ~\,;. I' I /;11 ""\.._~, '
1\ \;:, ,I'. ',',. ~/"".".~- - \, I
JJv , ~.
-',{F4 'f:/ I -!I'Ve ""
UN.
"
.."
"
,
\
- i!0> ,!jFBi~~. E I f
1",';0;;;:;1 f: l::::t f
(t)~~)..?i)a.~ 0
~o "'''''''_ ~
1;;1'" ;;I~o"'''' 1'- I f
iC:!J!':~"'~:t
g~~",o~~ I
1~~i:o~a"l
c::,..c::"'~
~)o.iC:r-::o(f) ~
I" 0 r-r'I1QJC:1 t:.-
1'11:-1 t"I:::t ,.....,
~~~~;g~ ....., CJ:J
....., .C/)
I a~~j::1 ,....., ...
= rr1 r)
, C-"" -13 '"
= '"
>.< .~ ::2: >.... (lj '"
I ~~t;l ~I , c.-:> ~-4 .~ '"
~~~"'~ =
I = !E1.
L"'!.!J ::2: ~
~ . . rt)
~ \, .
=>
c.-:> 0
=>
'V
f f
f ~
----- ?
~
0
~
...
f
f
\
\
\
~
...
'"
'"
'"
'"
I
,
I
------
f
l
I
,
,
i
.-
f
/'
/ ~~
f
,%"1:>.
O~-1>
I ",;q..v.
~'l'
, ~~
,
, <"
,
,
,
I' ,
"
\
\ 1
. - - -
, "'aoJ: "
~C::~l
, 0(;')0'
.. .
- -,
I
I
I
I JlW(\~ a~3I'-
~
- - - -
~
'"
I
I
1
,
t~
'"
1:;1
I~
,'"
...
'"
'"
'"
'"
I
,
I
. ."
"'~
8:0
~~
i5
~~
'"
",Ill
~~
~~
--5\- .
- N>l'"
~..."'.
'" "'-" 1
N OJ
~~~ -_'?-"
"'::l. 1 r 1
_ 1 I
o I I
r--- - - \
1
1
I ----
110'
....
I":
~
I
~I
'"
,,:,
~
I
t~:r
I ~~
:0",
~g .
I . S1"
",;!l
/l({ :0:0
I:~ ~i
~~~
, LJ
r-i
I 1 I
110 I
I ~2 I
I ~~ I
I ;'" 1
J I I
L .J
&>
124.
"- 0 -I
"- I
!
r-
;;; I I
'" I
I ,
... I
'"
'"
I '"
Ii' '"
I")
Ii
,f
I
I
I
I
I
/
~p
-~
"'",
~6
~:;
0'"
:oS1
","
:0'"
" "
~o
!il
'"
Sl
-
-
0'
.~f'.' .tp rI>/
":~\\-~~.. Go.$
~')~ ,l;~
.<j",;,,0 f:i1>
..~ rfJ.... ~i'1
~\\-.. s,,-t.P'
,>i'of> ~~/
fJil
&1
I
-
r
1
1
1
I
L
o
If)
1~. 0
:~,; .p. 0
C!,(J)
-I
81 I
-"'l l
,.
r- I I
~ I 1
:t... i:! "1 I
~,,' ~<;l )! ),
~p Iil~ ~
O~ '" . I J
~ I / I
~~ / /
",'" '7 /
~ /
;;; ...-/
~+ _ - -:f,ev' -:---
- ~-
- r::: - - - ,J.,3ll'V ^
.~rs) I a'1'O~ ~~~ ~ ~5~~:"
(6~ ggi! ~g!il~~i!
~la;;; Sl2",~;;I'"
::;~'" ",il:M"'j!~
~"'~ !;1Y>~j!;;;'"
"'g~ !;l~~",,,,~
~~_ il'l~ ,,~
",ili'" O"~~;;jj!
1J:Z~ :o~ ""Oi::"l
:oOjo g:Oi!lil,..'"
f"rt~ -r :Q -"'a:tJ~
~"';;! "''''- "''''
",:o~ "',..~... ~
"~'" ,..o!/!g~~
Oz'" :Z::s;o)o.(I);o
"'''';;: ""''Z'::;l:}",
~Y>", ;gl:}~S! g
r;1~~ ~o!il"'~~
Oa go ~~
" )..0 l/)~
c:: f:j!~~CI
~ i!~h
'" '" ~
'"
~
-'
:
0> /I
&; o.
~,
g.
.j>
o
"
;;<,'
-
-=-:r--
- - ;3^ '1'38
n
,i
':~
'"
o.
S33~1
-
~"'~i!la!l!f-
j!ld"';;;;;Io
",~1iig~~~
"':O;;!la~~r-
~oi'5~,,~g
'" ","
!il"''''i!5fi;;;'''
~)!~"'''''''~
~~oU),,~
PJog~Sl"'~
$:J~i!~~~g
;g~;;:~~~
PI V10"'tJ~
;g~~,dlla
1ilr;~Q\:1;;1
~!a ~:t:
"''''!l!~~~
t:ji~o<:1""l
...,,,c::002
00"'::;",:0
~",o~r-\ri
",O;$; '"
~"T1~~:z:{;;
-i!:<i!0
'"
c)V1~-o::!lC)cnc")f\:I
~)!"'Ql;;;~~~.
~~:!J",!l!51~51~
o PJ~",,,,. ",,,,
::;,..0 :o;;l,..;;I)!
~~"'~~"'~g{
C;) ~:r""~z"'O~
~~'<l",~1J"'1il'"
'" "'0'"
o:;5:!~:tJ::r:-i!~
1C")~~)o.~g<:o
. ):..CD-."r-~O"
::::Jc:(/)r-...... C')
~"''''''~~~~
"'::to ...~.
o~~~;;:. "'",
-""''''''''''la'''
",~o"')!",OO
.J: -or-(;)=tJo
,." lJ:;1o,..r-~3::
l/):z:IT1;o;o""::t~
,..SlgOl;;;Rl:}:O
;;;'" . "'~ ;:
)!"'~~i3l::O~t:l
:0:0",,,, - -
....;:"'::;>-t::tJ;::J-t
;;;r-o;:",
'" ",'"
- '"
:z: ...
~;g;;:",~g~;l1'" :c::
00 "r-;;I1';'" 0
;Ii"",:o"''''i! ;,i
~:o~"'~)!;;;'" l;j
"'::<:o~~~o;g
1S0ogo. ~o
~~o~1n~~~
...:O~:o~028
zOJU)-( r-)>.
!T1!,1~~xOr-5
!5"!5"'~0'"
f11~ o::t~n,
-~i!"'~"''''
Bi"'''';;I :..'"
)!i!"'0~;;f'2'
r-rr,q}"ti-< S2
~:r;~~~~~
"'~ -",~";;I
....tI) 'r- 0
~~v;g~!l!o
<::M~-t):..::ot
)!i=;';~",..,~
:z;~ . rr,~f't1 ~
~;o =i (I)
!il
11:."
. 1/
~
.
~
~
€ )>
0
. '"' ~
x
;; !-< ~ ~
0
..
0 I ffSC:::C::: ~ ;;;
. -Cl
~ 00
C> l.'3<>f!::lH- -"m
. C> - P .....~ !\l~
~
a I ". .......CD)> OJ'S
.". ..., o t-'.;" "'1 n
. F ~g..~ :::0 ~~
~ '"
.". iil g &'l H-
I
(J1 ~ ::l Yl
(J1 Po........
(J1 ;"1
(J1
,..,..'"
R"'\:l
0"'<:
~ra",
~)""'i
<:~~
~;;I*
'" ~
~g~
"'~'"
g~~
la...o
~
~
(f)
s
~
o
...
l>
N !l! ill ~ ~ !i; ~
\:l G ~ '" ~ P.l r-
" -; !;l
~ 0 ~ "
'" ~ '" ...
~ Y.> ~ I !O
::j ... ~
~ III 5j '" ~
0
:0 '"
CJol 0>
ON-SITE WASTEWATER PLANS
TAX PARCEL # 821-07:3-010
GLENDON BIOAL TER SYSTEM FOR
LAURA STORM
SOILS APPLlCA T/ON, INC.
86J CARLSBORG ROAD, SUITE A,
SEQUlM, WA 98J82
PH (360) 683-6300
FAX (360) 683-5652
Wetlands Rating Field Data Form
Background Information:
Name of Rater:.:r;- leAN I' S
Affi;iatiOn:~
Date: -! () /2:1 / 04
I /
Name of wetland (if known):
Government Jurisdiction nf welland: ~f~ 5(fVl r~
Location: 1/4 Section: 1'\ vJ of 1/4 s: 5 \A) Section: I Township: 2 ~ Range: -.L..W
Sources of Information: (Check all sources that apply)
Site visit: j( USGS Topo Map: X NWI map: .x Aerial Photo: X-- Soils survey:L
Other: _ Describe:
When The Field Data form is comptete enter Category here: \ .:JI.... I
a.l. High Quality Natural Wetland
Answer this question if you have adequate information ur experience to do so.
If not find someone wi\h \he expertise to answer the questions. 1ben, if the
answer to questions la, Ib and Ie are all NO, contact the Natural Heritage
program of DNR.
la. Human caused disturbances.
Is \here significant evidence of human-caused changes to topography or
hydrology of the wetland as indicaled by any of \he following conditions'?
Consider only changes that may have taken place in \he last 5 decades. The
impacts of changes done earlier have prohably been stabilized and \he wetland
ecosystem will be close to reaching some new equilibrium that may represent
a high quality welland.
lal. Upstream watershed> 12% impervious.
1a2. Wetlantl is ditched and water !low is not obstructed.
I a3. Wetland has been graded, fillet!, logged.
la4. Water in wetland is c~ntrolled by d. ikes, weirs. etc. 0\?:'(ld - ~;.-~t "fl-' 111'
1a5.Wetland is grazed. (l'i5h:ffiz.oJ\'f IjY.A.S 11"7.<.1 h,,~.o. /law, 01~,K,1'_
I a6. O\her indicators of disturbance (list below) So\)'il',04'" e...t~. d )
Circle Answers
Yes: go to Q.2
Yes: go III Q.2
(~go to Q.2
C~o to Q.2
Yes: go to Q.2
Yes: go to Q.2
No: go to lb.
25
lb Are illerI' populations of non-native plants which arc currenlly present,
cover more than 10% of the wetland, and appear to be invading native
populations? Briefly describe any non-native plant populations and
Information source(s):
Ie. Is there evidence of human-caused disturbances which have visibly
degraded water qualIty. Evidence of Ille degradation of water quality
Include: direct (untreated) runoff from roads or parking lots; presence,
or historie evidence, of waste dumps; oily sheens; the smell of organlc
chemicals; or lifestock use. Briefly describe:
0.2. Irreplaceable Ecological Functions:
Docs the wetland:
e have at least 1/4 acre of urganic soils deeper than 16 inches
and the wetland is relatively undisturbed; OR
[lIf the answer is NO because the wetland is disturbed brieJly describe:
IndiCators of disturbance may include:
- Wetland has been graded, lilled, logged;
- Organlc soils on the surface are dried-out for
more than half of the year;
- Wetland receives direct stonnwater runoff from
urban or agricultural areas.];
OR
e have a forested class greater than I acre; tl;,5v me J-
OR off>;d.e.
e have characteristics of an estuarioc system;
OR
e have eel grass, lloating or non-tloating kelp beds?
2a. Bogs and Fens
Are any of the three followiog conditions met for the area of organic soil?
2a.l. Are Sphagnum mosses a common ground covcr (>30%) and the
cover of invasive species (see Table 3) is less than 10%'1
Is the area of sphagnum mosses and deep organlc soils> 112 acre?
Is the area of sphagnum mosses and deep organic soils 114-112 acre?
201.2. Is there an area of organic soil which has an emergent class with at least
one species from Table 2, and cover of Invasive species is < 1ll% (see Table 3)'
Is the area of herbaceous plants and deep organlc soils> 1/2 acrc'l
Is the area or herbaceous plants and deep organlc soils 1/4-112 acre?
26
YES: go to Q.2
No: go to Ie,
YES: go to Q.2
NO: Possible Cat I
contact DNR
(NO to alt: go to Q.3)
YES go to 2a
ci~:~;-t;~
-~
YES: Go to 2c
YES: Go to 2d
YES:
YES:
Category I
Category II
NO: Go to 2a.3
YES:
YES:
Category I
Category \I
NO: Go to 2a.3
2a.3. Is the vegetation a mixture of only herbacl."t'us plants amI Sphagnum
mosses with no scrub/shrub or forested classes'!
Is the area of herbaceouS plants. Sphagnum, and deep organic
soils> 1(2 acre?
Is the area of herbacoous plants, Sphagnum. and deep organic
soils 1/4-lfl acre?
Q.2b. Mature forested wetland.
2b.l. Does 50% of the cover of upper forest canopy consist of evergreen
trees older than SO years or deciduous trees older than 50 years?
Note: The size of trees is often not a measure of age. and size cannot
be used as a surrogate for age (see guidance).
2b.2. Does 50% of the cover of forest canopy consist of evergreen trees older
than 50 years, AND is the structural diversity of the forest high as (
characterized by an addilionallayer of trees 20'.49' tall, shrubs 6'.20',
tall, and a herbacoouS groundcover?
2b.3. Does ( 25% of the areal cover in the herbaceouslgroundcover or
the shrub layer consist oflnvasiveJexljtic plant species from the IiSl on p. 19'!
Q.Ze. F.<;tuarine wetlands.
2cl. Is the wetland listed as National Wildlife Refuge. National Park.
National Estuary Reserve, Natural Area Preserve, State Park, or
Educational. Environmental or Scientilic Reserves designated under
WAC 332-30-151?....
2c.2. Is the wetland> 5 acres; . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. ........
Note: If an area contains patches of salt tolerant vegetation that are
1) less than 600 feet apart and that are separated by mudflats that go
dry ona Mean Low TIde, or
2) separated by tidal channels that are less than 100 feet wide;
all the vegetated areas are to be considered together in calculating
the wetland area.
or is the wetland 1-5 acres; . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
................
or is the.wetland < 1 acre? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
................
YES: Category I
YES: Category II
NO: Go to Q.3.
VF~. rateQOrv I
CEO; Go 10 2b.2 )
YES: Go to 2b.3
NU: uO to Q.:l ____.
YEf. Category 1
-NO. Go to Q. j -
--.
YES: Category I
NO: Go to 2c.2
YES: Category I
YES: Go to 2c.3
YES: Go to 2cA
27
2c.3. Does the wetland meet at least.3 of the following 4 criteria:..
- minimum existing evidence of human related disturbance such as
diking, ditching, filling, cultivation, grazing or the presence of non-
native plan! species (see guidance for delinition);
. surface water connection with tidal saltwater or tidal freshwater;
. at least 75% of the wetland has a 100' buffer of ungrazed pasture,
open water, shrub or forest;
. has at least 3 of the following features: low marsh; high marsh; tidal
channels; lagoon(s);woody debris; or contiguous freshwater wetland.
2cA. Does the wetland meet all of the four criteria under 2c3. (above)'!. .
Q.2d. Eel Grass and Kelp Beds.
2d. L Are eel grass beds present? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2d.2. Are there floating or non-floating kelp hed(s) present with greater than
50% macro algal cover in the month of August or September'! . . .. .....
Q.3. Category IV wetlands.
3a. Is the wetland: less than I acre llII!1.
hydrologically isolated llII!1.
comprised of one vegetated class that is dominated (> 80% areal cover)
by one species from Table 3 (page 19) or Table 4 (page 20 )
3b. Is the wetland: less than two acres
and, hydrologically isolated,
with one vegetated class, and > 90% of areal cover is any combination of
species from Table 3 (page 19)
3c. Is the wetland excavated from upland llII!1 a pond smaller than 1 acre
without a surface watcr connection to streams, lakes, rivers, or other
wL11and. and has < I), I acre of vegelation.
2R
YES: Category I
NO: Category II
YES: Category II
NO: Category III
YES: Category I
NO: go to 2d.2
YES: Category 1
NO: Category II
YES: Category IV
cNO: go to Jb-:,
YES: Category IV
L-;.:;-;;;:-~
NO: go to-~
y~>~
NO. go 10 Q1.>
C-,.,,,_.
a.4. Significant habitat value.
Answer all questions and enter data requested.
4a. Total wetland area
Estimate area, select from choices in the near-right column, and score in the
far column:
Entel acreage of wetland here: r 0 tacres. and source: e.s+iM<lJ~.J
4b. Wetland classes: Circle the wetland classes below that qualify:
Open Water: if the area of open water is > 114 acre J .
Aquatic Beds: if the area of aquatic beds > 114 acre. ?
Emergent: if the area of emergent class is > 114 acre. ,./
Scrub-Shrub: If the area of scrub-shrub class is > 114 acre, ,,/
Forested: if area of forested class is > 114 acre, v
A<Id the number of wetland classes, above, that qualify. and u.:n
score according to th.e columns at right
e.g. If there are 4 classes (aquatic bed~. open water, emergent &
scruh- shrub), you would circle g points in the far right column.
4c. Plant species diversity.
For each wetland class (at right) that qualifies in
4b above, count the number of dltli:rent plant species
you can find that cover more than 5% of the ground.
You do not have to name them.
0iIS:l
!Aquallc Bcd
Score in column at far right:
e.g. If a wetland has an aquatic bed class with 3 species, Emergent
an emergent class with 4 species and a scrub-shrub.
class with 2 species you would circle 2, 2. and! in the
far column.
Note: Any plant species with a cover of> 5%
qualifies for points within a class. even those Scrub-Shruh
that are not of that class.
Forested
Circle sc....... that'lualify
ams ll!1in1S
>200 6
40- 2()()5-_
\r-rrI-4() - '!..~.//
:; - III .---.--3
1- 5 2
oj . 1 I
.<0.1 0
# of classes B!in1S
1.......0
2.......3
3.......6
C4......~
:;...... .10
# spt~des in class
I
2
3
>3
ruinl:l
II
!
2
3
o
__.._-u-.L_
2 -,
..-.......-:r---.-
I
2-3
,---4:5----.-
'----
>5-.-----
I
<}:4-._-- ..
..'----
>4
(}
I
L ..:."
3
I (}
1:-------- L
C3-4 ....2.-
--5-4--. 3
,<'1
OJ
29
4d. Structural diversity.
If the welland has a forested class, add I point if each of the following
classes is present within the forested class and is lamer than 1/4 acre:
-trees> 50' tall . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . c~ SSv IMvd
-trees 20'..49' tall . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
-shrubs. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
.hemaceous ground cover. . . . . . . . . . . . .
Also add I point if there is any "open water" or "aquatic bed" class
immediately next to the forested area (ie. there is no scrub/shrub or
emergent vegetation between them).
4e. Decide from the diagrams below whether interspersion betWCCIJ
wetland classes is high, moderate; low or none? If you think the
amount of interspersion falls in between lhe diagmffis score accordingly
(i.e. a modcmtely high amount of inslerspersion would score a 4,
while a moderately low amounl would score a 2)
none
low
moderate
moderate
4f. Habitat features.
Answer questions below, circle features that apply, and score to right:
Is there evidence that the open or slanding walcr was caused by beavers
Is a heron rookery located within 300'?
Are raptor nestls located within 3oo'?
Are there at least 3 slanding dead trees (snags) per acre greater than
10" in diameter al "breast height" (DBH)'!.
Are Ihere at least 3 downed logs per acre wilh a diameter
> 6" for alleast 10' in length')
Arc there areas (vegetaled or unvegetated) within the wetland that are
ponded for alleast 4 months out of the year, and the wetland has not
qualilied as having an open water class in Question 4b. ?
30
r .'-,.
eYES.I')
-YES7r
YES-t
YES-!
YES- I
..-High. 5--_
(_Mo~erate c j .':
Low-!
None - 0
low
high
YES = 2
YES= I
YES= I
YES =
YES= l'
YES = 2
~_J
"
4g. Connection to streams. (Score one answer only.)
4g.l. Does the wetland provide habitat for fish at any time of the year AND \
does it have a perennial surface water connection to a fish bearing stream. \)0 Sb,In r YES = 6
.d \Cbl\~ec\(c
4g.2 Does the wetland provide fish habitat seasonally AND does it have +0 !.-.tll,~
a seasonal SUIface water connection to a fish bearing stream. l (',"". YES = 4
4g.3 Does the wetland function to export organic matter through a surface
water connection at all times of the year to a perennial stream.
l.,_~
4g.4 Does the wetland function to export organic matter through a surface
water connection to a stream on a seasonal basis?
YES=2
4h. Buffers.
Score the existing buffers on a scale of 1- S based on the following four descriptions.
If the condition of the buffers do not exactly match the description. score either a
poin! higner or lower depending on whether the buffers are less or more degraded.
Forest, scrub, native grassland or open water buffers are present for
more than l00'around 95% of the circumference. Score = S
Forest, scrub, native grassland, or open water buffers wider than l00'
for more than In of the wetland circumference, or a forest, scrub,
grasslands, or open water buffers for more than SO' around 9S% of the
circumference. Score = 3
Forest, scrub, native grassland, or open water buffers wider than 100'
for more than 1/4 of the wetland circumference, or a forest, scrub, native
:::na;~:u:::~:r buffers wider than SO' for more than In of the (/~~~
No roads, buildings or paved areas within l00' of the wetland for more than
9S% of the wetland circumference. Score = 2
No roads, buildings or paved areas within 2S' of the wetland for more
than 95% of the circumference. or
No roads buildings or paved areas within SO' of the wetland for more than
In of the wetland circumference. Score = 1
Paved areas, industrial areas or residential construction (with less than 50'
between houses) are less than 25 feet from the wetland for more than 95%
of the circumference of the wetland. Score = 0
(p
31
4i. Connection to other habitat areas:
Select the description wllich best matches the site being evaluated.
-Is the wetland connected to, or part of, a riparian conidor at least 100' wide
connecting two or more wetlands; or, is there an upland connection present >100'
wide with good forest or shrub cover (>25% cover) connecting it with a
Significant Habitat Area?
-----_.~
..-,.- )
, YES=5'
- Is the wetland connected to any other Habitat Area with either I) a forested/shrub
corridor < 100' wide, or 2) a a corridor that is > lOO'wide, but has a low vegetative
cover less thJln 6 feet in height?
YES=3
-Is the wetland connected to, or a part of, a riparian conidor between 50 - 100' wide
with scrub/shrub or forest cover connection to other wetlands?
YES = 3
- Is the wetland connected to any other Habitat Area with narrow conidor (< I 00')
of low vegetation (< 6' in height)?
YES = I
- Is the wetland and its buffer (if the buffer is less thJln 50' wide) completely isolated
by development (urban, residential with a density greater than 21acre, or industrial)?
YES =0
Now add the scores circled (for a.5a - 0.51 above) to get a total.-- ~
Is the Total greater than or equal to 22 points? (' YES = CateR:orv II
NO = Category III
1k N6+t - I(VV-~t
Sl.de.l~ Mosh{
6 r{ -s ik Q) SOMe,
\ tUtl S CU'L es+if\1tLl-ed
ClIiAJ/oi ll~~W" eel.
32
.::\'7
tP\ , -
/) '17 \
?
VAJ.}\,. I'U.J.'U.''''
MODIFIED
ROUTINE ON SITE DETERMINATION METHOD
Has the vegetation, soils, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed?
If yes, what are modifiers:
SOILS
MaWed Series: 5 uJ!lM. tn,p(\ Gl r~ Ird ty SM\6l{ loa 1M. I ()- [ ~o
Hydric soils list?: Yes No ';;!. Hydric Inclusion? (\D
Dep1I1. Horizon Color Texture Hvdric Soil Indicators Yes
Matrix Mottle Histosol
to 'if<. a.Ja.... ,<,a."J~ II1A",Histic Epipedon
\ II i R.. ' 'II ..:J ~ l!j S'tl... ~ '11oAj... Gleyed .
. I' Sulfidic odor
Concretions
s:\opes-
No Deoth
~ "
1= ,,"
Is the hydric SOl ;itl?riOn met? Yes
Rationale:;::;I. thr-o.. '
HYDROLOGY
General wetland type or characteristic: Emergent Scrub/Shrub
Permanently flooded Seasonally flooded Temporarily flooded
Types of water bodies associated with the wetland: River_Stream
pondlLake Tidal_Drainage ditch/channel_Other:
Is the ground surface inundated? Yes":-NoXSurface water depth:.
Is the soil saturated? Y es_No:)LDepth to water in test hole:
Field evidence of surface inundation or soil saturation:
Forested
Saturated
Seep/Spring
Q
SUMMARY
Hydric soil present? Yes No "/.. Hydrology present? Yes
Hydrophytic vegetation present? Yes "I-. No
PercentofFAC,FACW,andOBLspecies: (60% (pAL",'\'1 \
Is the site a wetland? Yes NO-fu-T :t1:ti
Rationale:_:;~ OU\~ e';ihp", . i{(.Lbv f&' UL- ~(e-<-
\,\Je.!-{ rit1' Ll,~,~::k~.
OF '6
No
x
.
TEST HOLE #
\
Wiltermood Associates, Inc.
1015 SW Harper Road
Port Orchard, W A 98367
(360) 876-2403
LOCATION OF TEST HOLE
~tuv\. pJ(h~i\ Or OA\7r' '.-I.LHUJf of
TtI j:t 3 I
SEE REVERSE FOR VEGETATION
-
COMMON WETLAND AND NON-WETLAND VEGETATION
Dominant Tree Species
0/.. tover % cover
Pacific wiUow Sa/iJr: /aslamfra FACW _ Sitka spruce Picea sitchensi.J FAC
~
~ Ot<gon ash FraxlmLJ latifolia FACW _ Western red cedar lhuja pllmla FAC
~ Quaking aspcn Papu/ru tremu/ald... FAC+ _ Cll3C1ra Rhamnru punJrianD PAC-
Red alder A/nru rubra FAC _ Bigleafmaple Acer macraphyl/um FACU
~
- Black cottonwood Populru balsamifera FAC - Western hemlock Tsuga heterophyl/a FACU
- Scouler's wUlow Sala 3couleriana FAC _ Diluglas fir Pseudotsuga menziesii FACU
Other tree species present:
Dominant Shrub Species
- Hardhack Spiraea dougltuii FACW - ScoCs broom Cytisus .fcopariw FACU
_ Red Osier Dogwood Cornw sto/ani/era FACW _ Evergreen huckleberry Vaccillium C1Wltum FACU
_ Black !winherry Lon/cera involucrata FAC+ _ Himalayan blackberry Rubus discolor PACU
- Devil's tlub Oplopanax Iwrrldus FAC+ _ Sala! Gaultheria shal/an FACU
_ Salmonberry Rubus spectabilis FAC _ Indian plwn Oem/aria cerasiforme:i FACU
- Nootka rose RlJ.JQ nutkana FAC - Hazelnut Cory/us cornula FACU
_ Vine maple A.eer circinatum FAC- _ Red huckleberry Yacciniunt parvifolium UPL
_ English ivy HederQ helix FACU _ Oregon grape BerberiJ nervosa UPL
_ Red elderberry Sambucus racemOSQ FACU _ Ocean spray H%discw disc%t" UPL
_ Snowberty Symphoricarpcn albus FACU
_ Other shrub species present:
Dominant Forb Species
_ Skunk cabbage LY.1ichitum americanum oaL _ Slinging nettle Urlica diocia FAC+
- Cattail Typha latifolia OaL _ Spring beauty Claytonia sibirica FAC
_ Water parsley OenanJ.he 3annentoSQ OaL _ Velvet grass Holcus lanatus FAC
_ Slough sedge Cara obnupla OaL ~ Lady fern Athyriumfilix-ftmina FAC
- Small fruited bulrush Scirpw microcarpuJ oaL 1.5 Horsetail Equiselum arvense FAC
_ Tall manna grass Glyceria elata FACW _ Youtb-Qn-age To/mela menziesii FAC
_ Sawbeak sedge Carex slipata FACW - Cat's ear Hypochaeris radicala FACU
- Rushes Juncw spp. FACW _ Trailing blackberry Rubus un/nus FACU
- Soft rush Juncus effUJus FACW - Bracken fern Pleridium aquilinum FACU
_ Creeping buttercup RanunculUJ repem FACW - Sword fern Polystichum munilUm FACU
_ Reed Canary grass Phalaris arundindcea FACW _ Bleeding heart Dicentra formosa FACU
_ Other forb species present:~ . ~! k- fA ,I r. Tall f1"ll"L- h1'Jrtll. a:.r""J ;'", uc<- FAt:
5 ~'VYl - dd~ IS O~'~\ tc-
t.jO c. r,1.. ,:>; S-"-h." .1'1 " . tl c.
Percent of dominant species FAC, FACW, OBL: ICO?o UPLAND? '1( WETLAND?
Is the hydroph~c vegetation ~riterion met? YesLNo_ WETLAND TYPE: Palustrine Riverine
Rationale: / <)() '?r, fA<. Me\;\) t.h~ J . Lacustrine Estuarine
, r Forested Scroh/Shrub
Emergent Open Water
Wet MeadowlPasture
DATA I'UKlVl
MODIFIED
ROUTINE ON SITE DETERMINATION METHOD
dl.l,;~ sheeJ 4t i
State:
e
logy been significantly disturbed? Yes
No )(
SOILS
Mapped Series: SLunMtoWv\ ~rtLlIf'~ ~t\.A'\J,~ loav'V'., ()-gCJo slopes
Hydric soils list?: Yes No X Hydri Inclusion? n()
Deptll Horizon Color Texture Hvdric Soil Indicators Yes No Deoth
Matrix Mottle Histosol
l C ye. 3/ \ 5a<\J:J /D.."" Histic Epipedon
10 'if( 'Ll 1<;).. Cd,; \\ "Gleyed
. ' Sulfidic odor
Concretions
Is the hydric soil criterion met? Yes )( No
Rationale: ko..0 (l, ;-oM(1\ ..(",y s: 0 i I MIAH ix
~-\2
';).- \ ("
HYDROLOGY
General wetland type or characteristic: Emergent Scrub/Shrub y..
PeI1Ilanently flooded Seasonally flooded Temporarily flooded
Types of water bodies associated with the wetland: River_Stream
pond/Lake Tidal_Drainage ditch/channel_Other:
Is the gIound surface inundated? Yes":-NolSurface water depth:.
Is the soil saturated? Yes-A-No_Depth to water in test hole: -
Field evidence of surface mundation or soil saturation:
Forested
Saturated 'Ii
Seep/Spring X
Is the wetland hydrOlogy criterion k\? Yes 1- ~;No fu
RatIOnale: 50 I \ S'CfvvrA d. io ~ 5uf {-EO.
SUMMARY
Hydric soil present? Yes '"f.. No Hydrology present? Yes X No
Hydrophytic vegetation present? Yes "'f- No
Percent ofFAC, FACW, and OBL species:i, 00 OlD
Is the site a wetland? Yes X. _No ~ I
Rationale:_fOsi+\II.., ~m5 "ttl\ -th.(e~ \.~tlo.j:\rI.
Oll,f'tUlUkevs
I
LOCATlOl'i. OF TEST HOLE
\ArUl+ 0 l- TIt.#' - C1I\ f' A\.l€ c:t
l\t\.(d ",dZ-
SEE REVERSE FOR VEGETATION
/
ri
=r =
~ = -
I =r =
.- - -
t~.
WiItermood Associates, Inc.
1015 SW Harper Road
Port Orchard, W A 98367
(360) 876-2403
TEST HOLE # C;Z OF !?
COMMON WETLAND AND NON-WETLAND VEGETATION
Dominant Tree Species
Dj... IO""Ver % cover
pacific wiDow Salu ltuiandra FACW _ Sitka spruce Picea sitcJrenau FAC
-
_ Dregonash Fraxlma latifalia FACW _ Western red cedar Tlruja pliaIla FAC
_ Quaking aspen PapullU ITemulo/des FAc+ _ Cascara Rhamma pursmana FAC-
Red alder AlnlU rubra FAC _ Bigleafmaple Acer macrophyllum FACU
-
- Black cottonwood POpullU balsamifera FAC _ Western hemlock Tsuga heJerophyila FACU
- S couler's willow Salix Jcouleriana FAC _ Douglas fir PseudoDuga menziaii FACU
_ Other trel! species present:
Dominant Shrub Species
TI Hardhack Spiraea doug/cuil FACW - Scot'"s broom Cytisus &copariw FACU
_ Red Osier Dogwood Cornw stolOlfifel'Q FACW tr.A!:{.Evcrgreen hucklebeny Vaccinium Q1IQ./um FACU
_ Black twinbeny Lonicera involucra/a FAC+ _ Himalayan blackbeny Ruhu.s discolor FACU
- Dcvil's c:lub Oplopanax barr/dus FAC+ - SaW Gaultheria shallon FACU
_ Salmonberry Rubw spectabili.s FAC _low.... plum Oem/aria cerasiformes FACU
- Nootka rose RWQ 7Iutluuut FAC - H"",lnut Cory/us comuta FACU
_ Vine maple Acer circinatum FAC- _ Red hucklebeny Ytlccinium parvifolium UPL
_ English i'V)' Hedera helix FACU _ Oregon grape Herberl.! nervosa UPL
_ Red elderberry SambuCUJ racemo.Ja FACU _ Ocean spray Holodi4cUJ discolor UPL
_ Snowberry Symphoricarpos albus FACU
_ Other shrub species present:
Dominant Forb Species
_ Skunk cabbage LyjichitJJ.m americanum OBL _ Stinging nettle UT/ica diocia FAC+
- Cattail Typha lat!folia OBL _ Sprillg beauty Claytonia sibi,ica FAC
_ Water parsley Oenanthe sarmen/osa OBL _ Velvet grass BolclLI lana/us FAC
_ Slough sedge Carex obnup/a OBL _ Lady fern Alhyriumfilix-femina FAC
- Small fruited bulrush Scirpus microcarpus OBL 3D Horsetail Eqllise/um arvense FAC
_ Tall manna grass Glyceria elata FACW _ Youth-on-age Tolmeia menz/esii FAC
_ Sawbeak scdge COTex sf/pala FACW - Catls ear Hypochi:JeriJ rad/cala FACU
- Rushes Jum:w 'pp. FACW _ Trailing blackbeny RubuJ ursinus FACU
- Soft rush Junew 'flUslU FACW - Bracken fern Pleridium aquilinum FACU
_ Creeping buttercup Ranunculus repens FACW _ Sword fem Polystichum munUum FACU
~ Reed Canary grass Phalaris arondinacea FACW _ Bleeding heart Dicentra lormOJQ FACU
_ Other forb sp~~ ) prll b,w11 s FPrC
~6_Kt~Ln'( ; f.t.Q()- \ e{1
Percent ofdomilWltspecies FAC, FACW, OBL: \Of)0,7o UPLAND? WETLAND? X
Is the hydrophytic vegeta~on criterion met? Yesib-No_ WETLAND TYPE: Palustrine '1-. Riverine
Rationale: ),. SO /" rAc 'PA( L f C> /3.[ Lacustrine Estuarine
I Forested Scrub/Shrub X
Emergent Open Water
Wet Meadow/Pasture
lJAil\. rVAlU
MODIFIED
ROUTINE ON SITE DETERMINATION METHOD
Field Investigator: See.. do~ S-kee.+if \
Project/Site:
ApplicantJOwner:
Describe curre t conditions of wetland and
e" ,,+ \- IV 11\.
State:
Has the vegetation. soils, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? Yes
If yes, what are modifiers:
No 'f
SOILS
Mapped Series: Co.ssDlo-tl./ SMtJ~ IMM.I. ()-I.s- % slupe ~.
Hydric soils list?: Yes No 7 X Hyoric Inclusion? no
Depth Horizon Color Texture Hvdric Soil Indicators Yes No
Matrix Mottle Histosol
(0 'I ~ 3~~ - .~,Jc, ~, HisticEpipedon
!D~K ~ . "'Ie", l\ I I' Gleyed.
. t Sulfidic odor
Concretions
J.:- s~;\N~X.
Deoth
0-11
1\- (",
Is the hydriCJoil criter~n met?
Rationale: ., I j'" C r~-vlitL\
HYDROLOGY
General wetland type or characteristic: Emergent Scrub/Shrub
PeI1llanently flooded Seasonally flooded_Temporarily flooded
Types of water bodies associated with the wetland: River_Stream
Pond/Lake Tidal_Drainage ditchlwnnel_Other:
Is the ground surface inundated? Yes~No~Surface water depth:.
Is the soil saturated? Yes_No.-1J5epth to water in test hole:
Field evidence of surface inundation or soil saturation:
Forested
Saturated
Seep/Spring
SUMMARY
No.-L
Hydric soil present? Yes No >C Hydrology present? Yes
Hydrophytic vegetation present? Y es X No
Percent ofFAC, FACW, and OBL species: IDe 7'0
Is the site a wetland? Yes No X~ .J,.L'
Rationale: _ .;\_ s.;-h\,zTr;:d iuurzry \<1)"
_p.vv(\. 1'V\.~.a:e .r< .
TEST HOLE # :5
Gtltl~
OF
g
/
Ti
- -
... =1 =
(tA4
Wiltermood Associates, Inc.
1015 SW Harper Road
Port Orchard, W A 98367
(360) 876-2403
LOCATION OF TESIt HQLE
eO c,f (J-f Tu tt \
SEE REVERSE FOR VEGETATION
- I
I
I
COMMON WETLAND AND NON-WETLAND VEGETATION I
Dominant Tree Speci..
0;.,. IO"'\ler % cover
pacific willow ,
~ Salix ltuiandra FACW _Sitkaspruce Picea sitchensi.r FAC
~ Oregan ISh Fraximu latifalia FACW _ Westem red cedar Thujaplico/a FAC I
~ Qu.king aspen Papulru tremrdaides FAC+ _ Caacua Rhammu punhiana FAC- ,
Red aid" Alnus rubra FAC _ Bigleaf maple Acer macrophyllum FACU
~
~ Black cottonwood Papulru balsamifera FAC - Western hemlock Tsuga heterophylla FACU
- Scouler's willow Salix. scouleriana FAC _ Douglas fir Pseudouuga menzie.sii FACU
_ Other tree specic! present:
Dominant Sbrub Species
- Hardhatk Spiraea douglasil FACW - scoes broom Cytisw scoparius FACU
_ Red Osier Dogwood Cornw ~tolonifera FACW _ E...-green hucklebeD)' Vac:cinium ovatum FACU
_ Bluck twinbeD)' Lonicera involucrata FAC+ _ Himalayan blackberry Rulnu disc%r FACU
- Devil's club Oploponax horrldu. FAC+ - Salol Gaultheria .hallon FACU
_ Salmonberry Rubus spectabi/is FAC _lndi3ll plwn Oemlaria cerasiforme.s FACU
- Nootkarose Rosa nutkana FAC - Hazelnut Cory/us cornuta FACU
_ Vine maple A.cer circinatum FAC- _ Red hucklebeny Vaccinium parvifolium UPL
_ English ivy Hedera helix FACU _ On:gon grape Berberis nervosa UPL
_ Red elderbeD)' Sambucus racemosa FACU _ Ocean spray H%discw discolor UPL
_ Snowbeny Symphoricarpo3 albus FACU
_ Other shrub species present:
Dominant Forb Species
_ Skunk cabbage LY3;chitum americanum OBL _ Stinging nettle Urtica diocia FAC+
- Cattail Typlw loti/olio OBL _ Spring beauty Claytonia sibir;ca FAC
_ Waler parsley Oenanthe JarmemOJa OBL _ Velvet grass Ho/clLJ /anatus FAC
_ Slough .ed&" Carex obnupta OBL _ Lady fern .A.thyriumfilix-femina FAC
- Small fruited bulrush Sdrpus microcarpw OBL - Horsetail Equisetum arvense FAC
_ Tall manna grass G/yceria elotQ FACW _ YOllth-on~age Tolmeia menziesii FAC
_ Sawbeak sedge Carex stipata FACW - Cat's ear HypochiJeris radicata FACU
- Rushe. Juncw spp. FACW _ Trailing blackbeD)' Rub"" ursinta FACU
- Soft rush Juncw effusus FACW - Bracken rem Pteridium aqui/inum FACU
_ Creeping buttercup Ranuncu/us repefU FACW _ Sword rem Polystichum munitum FACU
_ Reed Canary grass Phalaris arundinacea FACW _ Bleeding heart Dicentra formo.sa FACU
_ Other f~ species present: . 'FALJ tD T ..JLF.e<.L l) p - Fed. 10"_ CLiv"J ,11 (<'PI. -
IO~ ~r~(~v~cn~r"-fzJ- i-fIL
~O . 1 rt' !e..j' II ( )<:7 rriJK) r=A (
Percent of dominant species F AC, F ACW, OBL: 1 DCc;?o UPLAND? X WETLAND?
Is the hydrophytic vegetation cri~ Y~NO_ WETLAND TYPE: Palustrine Riverine
Lacustrine Estuarine
Ralionale: >.sb ~ 7.. n. ( l
Forested Scrub/Shrub
Emergent Open Water
Wet~eadovvlPasrurre
DATA FORM
MODlFffiD
ROUTINE ON SITE DETERMINATION METHOD
FieJdlnvestigator: ,L)e't rWn s~PPf- # \ Date:
Project/Site: County:
Applicant/Owner: Surveyor:
Describe current con 'tions o(wetland and SllrTounding areas:
; I- S ++ LAJ.) l, 1 I 5e ;\ .
t-I.
Has the vegetation, soils, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed?
Jfyes, what are modifiers:
State:
0...
Yes No X:
,
Mapped Series: S LV 0../1'\ -\- 0 fA} f\
Hydric soils list?: Yes No x
Depth Horizon Color '
Matrix . Mottle
I ~ ~ ~ "J-/?--
I f<. r:,/ I -
/
~~,f
SOILS
jTo..lsd \ y _~tu" d~ IllI1l1J\ J.. d - g '70 i loPt's
Hydric Incl ion? nor
Texture Hvdric Soil Indicators Yes No Deoth
~ j "'''000]
Sl\- 1. OIl)"'HistiC Epipedon
l/)/.tm <, hI G1eyed.
Sulfidic odor
Concretions
Is the hydric soil criterion met? Yes X . ~
Rationale: Lou) r [, rem 0\. c'Srl )
S'c, ; I 1Vt6\. 1-r!) X
HYDROLOGY
General wetland type or characteristic: Emergent Scrub/Shrub X
Permanently flooded Seasonally flooded_Temporarily flooded
Types of water bodies associated with the wetland: River_Stream
PondlLake_Tidal_Drainage ditch/channel_Other:
Is the ground surface inundated? Yes~NoXSurface water depth:.
Is the soil saturated? Yes~No_Depth to water in test hole:
Field evidence of surface inundation or soil saturation:
Forested
Saturated
Seep/Spring ~
ISthewetlandhYdr~et? Yes X No
Rationale: 60 1 '. iv CUi Ft. (-I .
SUMMARY
Hydric soil present? Yes K No Hydrology present? Yes X
Hydrophytic vegetation present? Yes ')(. No
PercentofFAC, FACW, and OBL species: \ I0tJt7"Jo
Is the site a wetland? Y es~No J I _, J
RationaJe:_f/'?_it>'IIP i.1.T i f;t;t"y<;.4r-r a \l-T~(t"~
No
L\ ,( +{ M'l (( rrAftIJ~WS .
TEST HOLE # '-I
OF ?
/
~
== .=
, == =
ifA4
Wiltermood Associates, Inc.
1015 SW Harper Road
Port Orchard, W A 98367
(360) 876-2403
LOCATION OF TEST HOLE
.lJ(){~ ,oF (tj tt L
SEE REVERSE FOR VEGETATION
COMMON WETLAND AND NON-WETLAND VEGETA nON
Dominant Tree Species
0;" to"er % cover
Pacific willow Sala lasiarulra FACW _ Sitka spruce Picea .itchensis FAC
-
_ QI<gon ash Fraxinus lati/olia FACW - Western red cedar Thuja pUcara FAC
_ Qu>ki"8 aspen Populus tremu/aides FAC+ - Cascara 1IJJJJmn.. pur.mana FAC-
Red alder Aln... rubra FAC _ BigJeaf maple Acer macrophyllum FACU
-
- Black collonwood Popul.. bauami/era FAC - Western hemlock T.uga hererophylla FACU
- Scouler's willow Sa/ix Jcouleriana FAC _ Douglas lir Pseudo/suga menzie.sii FACU
_ Other tree species present:
Dominant Sbrub Specie.!
- Hardhack Spiraea douglasii FACW - Scot's broom Cyt;sus scopariw FACU
_ Red Osier Dogwood Cornw slo/anifera FACW _ Evergreen huckleberry Yaccinium Qvatum FACU
_ Black !winberry Lonicera invo{ucrala FAC+ _ Himalayan blackberry Rubus disc%r FACU
- Devil's club Op/opanax horridus FAC+ - Salal Gaultheria shallan FACU
_ Salmonberry Rubus spec/obilis FAC _Indian plwn Oem/aria cerasiformes FACU
Nootka rose Rosa nutkana FAC - Hazelnut Corylus cornuta FACU
-
_ Vjncmaplc Acer circinatum FAC- _ Red huckleberry Vaceinium parvifolium UPL
_ English ivy Hedera helix FACU _ Oregon grape Berherl~ nervosa UPL
_ Red elderberry Sambucus racemosa FACU _ Ocean spray H%discUJ disc%r UPL
_ Snowbeny Symphoricarpo$ albus FACU
_ Other sluub species present:
Dominant Forb Species
_ Skunk cabbage Lysichitum americanum OBL _ Stinging nettle Ur/tea diocia FAC+
- Cattail Typha iatifolia OBL _ Spring beauty Claytonia sihirica FAC
_ Water parsley Oenan/he sarmentosa OBL iQ Velvet grass Holcus lanatus FAC
_ Slough sedge Cara abnupla OBL _ Lady rem Athyriumfilix.-femina FAC
- Small fruiled bulrush Scirpus microcarpus OBL "-.0 Horsetail Equtsetum arvense FAC
_ Tall manna grass G/yceria e/ata FACW _ Y outh-on-age To/mela menziesii FAC
_ Sawbeak sedge Carex stipata FACW - Cat's ear Hypochaeris radicata FACU
Rushes JuncU.J :ipp. FACW _ Trailing blackberry Rubus ursinus FACU
'/ S"Sofi rush Juncus eflwus FACW - Bracken fern Pteridium aquilinum FACU
_ Creeping buttercup Ranunculus repens FACW - Sword fern Polystichum munilum FACU
_ Reed Canary grass Phalaris arundinacea FACW _ Bleeding heart Dicentra formosa FACU
_ Other forb species present:
Percent of dominant species FAC, FACW, OBL: ( 00 '70 UPLAND? WETLAND? X-
Is Ibe hydrophytic vegetation criterion met? Yes~No_ WETLAND TYPE: Palustrine !<-- Riverine
Rationale: > .c,fJ '7n 1=11<:. fite IAJ Q f1 L . Lacustrine Estuarine
{ I Forested Scrub/Shrub )<
Emergent Open Waler
Wet Meadow/Pasture
DATA "UWU
MODIFIED
ROUTINE ON SITE DETERMINATION METHOD
W\
State:
~
(> .
Has the vegetation, sit, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? Yes
lryes, what are modifiers:
Is tIu: hydric soil critef.ion met?
Rationale: 2- 0
SOILS
1(/!.vtUlt SI'L'l'\~'dO!, LV) g -g 70 stbP.e 5
Hydric c uslon? rt 0
Texture Hvdric Soil Indicators Yes No Deoth
Histosol
t;tI-~~ ~1 Histic Epipedon
Gleyed .
Sulfidic odor
Concretions
Mapped Series: 5w ~j ~J ^
Hydric soils list?: Yes No'
Deplh Horizon Color
Matrix J Mottle
o-l (., IDye 2_2 -
,
HYDROLOGY
General wetland type or characteristic: Emergent Scrub/Shrub
Permanently flooded Seasonally flooded_Temporarily flooded
Types of water bodies associated with the wetland: River_Stream
pond/Lake Tidal_Drainage ditch/channel_Other:
Is the ground surface inundated? Yes"':'-No6.-Surface water depth:.
Is the soil saturated? Yes_NoLDepth to water in test hole:
Field evidence of surface inundation or soil saturation:
Forested
Saturated
Seep/Spring
Is the wetland hydrolog
Rationale:
SUMMARY
Hydric soil present? Yes No K Hydrology present? Yes
Hydrophytic vegetation present? Yes X. No
PercentofFAC, FACW, and OBL species: \ OO~)
Is the site a wetla d? Yes No X
Rationale: !\. L ". i [
,e.
No X.
LO<JTlON OF TEST HOLE
N . TIt if Lf 1 :;, c,{ ~+rUU1/l
)
5
OF $?
TEST HOLE #
SEE REVERSE FOR VEGETATION
Wiltermood Associates, IDe
1015 SW Harper Road
Port Orchard, W A 98367
(360) 876-2403
%.. to""Ver
COMMON WETLAND AND NON-WETLAND VEGETA nON
Dominant Tree Species
pacific YIiIlow Sa/i>: lasiandro
~
~ Oregon ISh Fraximu /at/falla
~ Quaking aspen Papulw Iremu/aides
Red alder A/nw rubra
~
JQ. Black c"",,.wood Papulw balsamifera FAC
~ Scouler', willow ') Salix scauJ<yi"fO ) I FAC
. 4 P !1I-1.\.\-eA 11'1 LI/lildC) UfltM'S
_ Other tree species present:
Hardhack
_ Red Osier Dogwood
_ Black !winberry
Devil's dub
_ Salmonberry
Nootka rose
_Vineltlllple
_ English ivy
_ Red elderberry
_ Snowbeny
_ Other shrub species present:
_ Skunk cabbage
Cattail
_ Water parsley
_ Slough sedge
Small fruited bulrush
_ Tall manna grass
_ Sawbeak sedge
Rushes
Soft rush
_ Creeping buttercup
15- Reed Canary gra..
_ Other forb species present:
Spiraea douglCJ3iJ
Cornw .Jr%nifera
Lonicera involucrata
Oplopanax horr/dw
Rubus spectabili3
Rosa nutkana
Acer circinatum
Hedera helix
SambuC1l3 racemOSQ
Symphoricarpos a/bus
LY3ichitum americanum
Typha loti/alia
Oenanthe 3armentosa
Corex obnupta
Scirpus microcarpw
Glyceria elata
Carex stipata
Juncw spp.
Juncw ef/us1l3
Ranunculus reperu
Phalaris arundinacea
FACW
FACW
FAc+
FAC
% cover
_ SilkaspnlCe
Westem red cedar
Cascara
_ Bigleafmaple
Western hemlock
_ Douglas fir
Dominant Shrub Species
FACW
FACW
FAC+
FAC+
FAC
FAC
FAC-
FACU
FACU
FACU
Scot's broom
_ Evergreen huckleberry
_ Himalayan blackberry
SaW
_Indian plum
Hazelnut
_ Red huckleberry
_ Oregon grape
_ Ocean spray
Dominant Forb Specie,
OBL
OBL
OBL
OBL
OBL
FACW
FACW
FACW
FACW
FACW
FACW
Percent of dominant species F AC, F ACW. OBL:
Is Ibe hydrophytic vegetation criterion me? Yes
Rationale: 50 '"
_ Stinging nettle
_ Spring beauty
_ Velvet grass
_ Lady fern
.lOHorsetail
_ YOlJth-on-age
Cat's ear
_ Tniling blackberry
Bracken fem
Swan! fem
_ Bleeding heart
UPLAND? X,
WETLAND TYPE:
Picea sitchetUu
17rujo pllcato
Rhamnus purshiana
Acer macraphyllunt
Tsuga heterophyl/a
PseudO/Juga me1JZi~ii
Cytiru.r &coparius
YacciniW1f ovatum
Rubw discolor
Gaultheria shal/an
Oem/aria cerasiformes
Corylw cornuta
Yaccin;um parvifoliwn
Berberu nervosa
Holodiscru discolor
Urtica diocia
Claytonia sibirica
Haleru lanatw
A thyrium filix.-femina
Equisetum arvense
To/meia menziesii
Hypochaeris radicata
Rubus ursinw
Pteridium aquilinum
Polystichum munitum
Dicentra formosa
WETLAND?
Palustrine Riverine
Lacustrine Estuarine
Forested Scrub/Shrub
Emergent Open Waler
Wet Meadow/Pasture
FAC
FAC
FAC-
FACU
FACU
FACU
FACU
FACU
FACU
FACU
FACU
FACU
UPL
uPL
uPL
FAC+
FAC
FAC
PAC
FAC
FAC
FACU
FACU
FACU
FACU
FACU
DAIA l'UWU
MODIFIED
ROUTINE ON SITE DETERMINATION METHOD
Field Investigator: 5 ee. d~ she.e t -# I
Project/Site: State:
App1icant/Owner:
Desaibe ~nt conditions of wetland and,surro din
I,Jv -'o,d. _f YO ( - 0",,,,1\
I ,
Has !he vegetation, soils, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? Yes
If yes, what are modifiers:
No x:
I
SOn.s
Mapped Series: 5illfJA/LtnLlJV\ gr,1\rt' II~ ,SIAM eLL! I0l1lJ1.1 O-Z'lv S 10 -:-:;.
Hydric soils list?: Yes No 7 Hydric lnclusion? 'Y" 0 ~
Depth Horizon Color Texture Hvdric Soil Indicators Yes No Depth
Matrix Mottle l . Histosol
(')_ 110 if I () Y R. 2/ I - .5', -hI ~ Histic Epipedon
.. Gleyed .
Sulfidic odor
Concretions
Is the hydric soil criterio,n met? Yes ):: No
Rationale: LouJ O'\J1'31<\Atf y/r 50;\
V\A.CL.tf'l X
HYDROLOGY
General wetland type or characteristic: Emergent Scrub/Shrub )tJ
Pennanently flooded Seasonally flooded Temporarily flooded
Types of water bodies associated with the wetland: River_Stream
pondlLake Tidal_Drainage ditch/channel_Other:
Is the ground surface inundated? Y es~No.:;LSurface water depth:.
Is the soil saturated? Yes~o_Depth to water in test hole: ~ I.
Field evidence of surface 1tiUndation or soil saturation:
Forested
Saturated X
Seep/Spring 'j
SUMMARY
Hydric soil present? Yes 'j. No Hydrology present? Yes X No
Hydrophytic vegetation present? Yes X No
Percent ofFAC, FACW, and OBL species: \ 00 alo
Is I~e site a etla?~? Ye~ )( _No
Rallonale: , oS/ V e. I~W.
TEST HOLE #
G OF .f
Wiltermood Associates, Inc.
1015 SW Harper Road
Port Orchard, W A 98367
(360) 876-2403
LOrCATIOl'} OF TEST HOLE~
\!lJ ( C, ~ ot Lit:#="")
SEE REVERSE FOR VEGETATION
COMMON WETLAND AND NON-WETLAND VEGETATION
Dominant Tree Species
0/_ IO~er . cl \1"1 e1 D/. cover
,/ ?\L\....."-~/l,~Cl,Jf\
D pacific TliUow
Sala ltuiandra FACW _ Silka spruce Picea .itchens" FAC
_ OregonlSb Fraximu kJdfal/a FACW _ Western red cedar Thuja pllcata FAC
_Quilingaspen PopulUSlTemulold.. FAC+ _ Cascara RJumrfl1l.J purlhiana FAC-
~ed alder Alnus rubra FAC _ Bigleafmaple Acer macrophyllum FACU
-
Black cotloowood Populus ballomifera FAC _ Westcm hemlock T.mga heterophylkJ FACU
-
ScoulCJ"s willow Sa/ix. scouleriana FAC _ Douglas fir Pseudoauga menzies.ii FACU
- . _ Other tJte 'pecies present:
.
Dominant Sbrub Specie,
;DHardhack Spiraea Jouglwii FACW _ Scot'$ broom CywUJ 3coparius FACU
_ Red Osier Dogwood C017fUS stalonifera FACW _ Evergreen hucklebeny Yaccinium ovaJum FACU
_ Black twinbelT)' Lonicera involucrata FAC+ _ Himalayan blackberry Rubus discolor FACU
- Devil's club Oplopanax horridul FAC+ - SaW Gaultheria .shallon FACU
_ Salmonbony Rubus spectabili.f FAC _Indian plum Oerrtlaria cerasiformu FACU
- Nootka rose Rosa nullr:ana FAC - Hazelnut Cory/us cornuta FACU
_ Vine maple Ace,. circinatum FAC- _ Red huckleberry Vaccinium parvifoliwn UPL
_ English ivy Hedera helix FACU _ Oregon grape Berberis nervosa UPL
_ Red elderberry Sambucus racemOSQ FACU _ Oceao spray H%discru discolor UPL
_ Snowbeny SymphoricarpoJ a/bus FACU
~_ O\,!er 'p'l'b 5p~crie~ ,qres~,\I:
Dominant Forb Sped...
_ Skunk cabbage LYJichitum americanum OBL _ Stinging nettle Urtica diocia FAC+
- Cattail Typha latifolia OBL _ Spring beauty C/aytonia sibirica FAC
_ Water parsley Oenanthr sarmentosa OBL _ Velvet grass Haleru lanatus FAC
_ Slnugh sedge Carex. obnupta OBL _ Lady rem A/hyrium filix.-femina FAC
- Small fruited bulrush ScirpuJ microcarpus OBL ..." 0 Horsetail Equisetum arvense FAC
_ Tall monna grass G/yceria e/ata FACW _ YOuth-oR-age To/mew menziesii FAC
_ Sawbeak sedge Carex slipota FACW - eat's ear HypochaeTis Tadicata FACU
- Rushes JunCU3 Ipp. FACW _ Trailing blackbelT)' Rubus ursinw FACU
Soft rush Juncus effu.nu FACW _ Bncken rem Pteridium aquili/TUm FACU
-
Creeping buttercup RanuncuJus reperu FACW _ Sword rem Polystichum munUum FACU
4 t;Reed Canary grass Pha/aris anmdinacea FACW _ Ble.ding hean DicentTQ formoJQ FACU
_ Other forb species present:
Percent of dominant species FAC, FACW, OBL: I Of) "J 0 UPLAND? WETLAND? X
Is the hydrophytic vegetation criterion met? ~N%t-; WETlAND TYPE: Palustrine .;1.. Riverine
Rationale: .>- S7) '7. "E8r( r=t4r vV(O I , Lacustrine Estuarine
F oresled Scrub/Shrub X-
Emergent Open Water
Wet MeadowlPasture
DATA FORM
MODIFIED
ROUTINE ON SITE DETERMINATION METHOD
Field Investigator: Sc: e. dtdo..., 5 h ee 1 :It I_Date:
ProjecVSite: County: State:
Applicant/Owner: Surveyor:
Describe current conditions of wetland and surrounding areas:
Has the vegetation, soils, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? Yes No 'j
If yes, what are modifiers:
SOILS
Mapped Series: rfl "I<; I 'eo peoJ
Hydric soils list~ No
Deplh Horizon Color Texture
" Matrix Mottle. I L I
CH f., I () Yr2 2/.1 - 51LDf-Il}llW\
Hydric Inclusion? -
Hvdric Soil Indicators Yes
Histosol
Histic Epipedon
Gleyed
Sulfidic odor
Concretions
No
Deoth
Is ~e hydric soil criterion met? rYes )( No
RatIOnale: Lou.) ..:It,.nY\llll t:fr. :2D' l l\\~
HYDROLOGY
General wetland type or characteristic: Emergent Scrub/Shrub )<
Pennanently flooded Seasonally flooded_Temporarily !looded
Types of water bodies associated with the wetland: River_Stream
Pond/Lake_Tidal_Drainage ditch/channel_Other:
Is the ground surface inundated? Yes_NoiSurface water depth:.
Is the soil saturated? Yes$No_Depth to water in test hole: 7"
Field evidence of surface inundation or soil saturation:
Forested
Saturated X
Seep/Springy
lA:11.\t>.y S-eer !'t'\J 111\
SUMMARY
Hydric soil present? Yes y.. No Hydrology present? Yes 'f-
Hydrophytic vegetation present? Yes Y No
PercentofFAC, FACW, an~BL species: I dO t:lc
Is the site a wetland? Yes No U
Rationale:'-poc,i+iVe '(\ i{/lWS ..ftrY f.L fu
No
t\.dlutJ pt\.I\.,;tI~.
TEST HOLE #
1
OF
~
~
== .=
, =.=
""<(~A4
Wiltermood Associates, Inc.
1015 SW Harper Road
Port Orchard, W A 98367
(360) 876-2403
LOCA nON OF TEST HOLE
.') W (o((1er (,r pmOe.f'tu ~ 10' -h?m'\.
f I pro p.e...ftJ
SEE REVERSE FOR VEGET AnON
COMMON WETLAND AND NON-WETLAND VEGETATION
Dominant Tree Species
0/.. m........er % CO:::Q2:tS ?!~I~~ ~)ensi'
- Pacific willow Salbe lasiandra FACW FAC
_ Oregon ash Fraximu lalifolia FACW s::- Western red cedar lhuja plIcata FAC
_ Quaking aspen POpu!U3 tremu/aides FAC+ - Cascara Rhamnus purshiana FAC-
Red alder Alnus rubra FAC _ Bigleaf maple Acer mm:rophyUum FACU
~ Black cottonwood Populus balsamifera FAC - Western hemlock Tsuga heterophy/la FACU
- Scoulcr's willow Salix scou/eriana FAC _ Douglas lir Pseudolmga menziesii FACU
_ Other tree species present:
Dominant Shrub Species
- Hardhack Spiraea doug/cuii FACW - Scot's broom CytiSu.f scoparius FACU
_ Red Osier Dogwood Carnus !lto/ani/era FACW _ Evergreen huckleberry Vaccinium ovatum FACU
_ Black twinberry Lonicera involucrato FAC+ _ Himalayan blackberry Rubus disc%r FACU
- Devil's club Oplopanax horridus FAC+ - Salal Gaultheria shallon FACU
_ Salmonberry Rubus spec/obms FAC _Indian plum Oem/aria cerasiforme.s FACU
- Nootka rose Rosa nutkana fAC - Hazelnut Corylus cornu/a FACU
_ Vine: maple Acer circinatum FAC. _ Red huckleberry Vaccinium parvifolium UPL
_ English ivy Hedera helix FACU _ Oregon grape Berberis nervosa UPL
_ Red elderberry SambllcUJ racemo.ra FACU _ Ocean spray HolodiscUJ ducolor UPL
_ Snowbeny Symphoricarpo.s albus FACU
_ Other shrub species present:
Dominant Forb Species
_ Skunk cabbage LY3ichitum americanum OBL _ Stinging nettle Urtica diocia FAC+
- Cattail Typha lalifolia OBL _ Spring beauty Claytonia sibirica FAC
_ Water parsley Oenanthe .sarmentosa OBL _ Velvet grass Holcuslanatu.r FAC
_ Slough sedge Carex obnupta OBL _ Lady rem Athyriumfilix.Jemina fAC
- Small fruited bulrush Scirpus microcarpus OBL ;;;LQ Horsetail Equisetum arvense FAC
_ Tall manna grass G/yceria elata FACW _ Youth-an-age Tolmeia menziesii FAC
_ Sawbeak sedge Corex stipata FACW - Cat's ear Hypochaeris radicata FACU
- Rushes Juncw spp. FACW _ Trailing blackberry Rubus ursinus FACU
- Soft rush Juncw efJUsus fACW - Bracken fern Pteridium aquilinum FACU
'40 Creeping buttercup RanuncuJus repens fACW - Sword fern Polystichum munUum FACU
'1fJ- Reed Canary grass Pha/aris arundinacea FACW _ Bleeding heart Dicentra formosa fACU
_ Other forb species present:
Percent of dominant species FAC, FACW, OBL: \eo "7c UPLAND? WETLAND? X
Is the hydmphytic vegetation criterion met? YiS~No- WETLAND TYPE: Palustrine X Riverine
Rationale: > S-(! <")" t:dtc f'ftL l.~ Lacustrine Estuarine
I Forested Scrub/Shrub X
Emergent Open Water
Wet Meadow/Pasrure
DATA l'UKlY.l
MODIFIED
ROUTINE ON SITE DETERMINATION METHOD
Field Investigator: Sf.( J c;..J-G\. S /1 e€ f-# I_Date:
Project/Site: County: State:
Applicant/Owner: Surveyor:
Desaibe current conditions of wetland and surrounding areas:
Has the vegetation. soils, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? Yes No 'f
If YeI, what are modifiers:
SOILS
Mapped Series: ~S"Jt.l.'lA\-olAnrl Cl fA I,'f II. ~.,~.. 1611 /11.-"- Q- g~o
Hydric soils list?: Yes No)C --;J ~ Hydric1nclusion? '"'0
Depth Horizon Color Texture Hvdric Soil Indicators Yes No
Matrix Mottle Histosol
rg~.~. 'LJl2.~ i::'i1t ~ gt:~:piPedon
Sulfidic odor
Concretions
~~~':q~(;)( fYL"J. 1'1.0 Yl4oH(-e S.
.~ /0 p€/1 .
DeDth
C-\~
10-1 .'
Is the h)'dric soil criter,on met?
RatiDnale: 2/7 C\ur.rvv'l\
HYDROLOGY
General wetland type or characteristic: Emergent Scrub/Shrub
Pennanently flooded Seasonally flooded_Temporarily flooded
Types of water bodies associated with the wetland: River_Stream
PondILake_TidaI Drainage ditch/channel_Other:
Is the ground surface inundated? Yes":""No.-'LSurface water depth:.
Is the soil saturated? Y es_No~Depth to water in test hole:
Field evidence of surface inundatIOn or soil saturation:
Forested
Saturated
Seep/Spring
SUMMARY
Hydric soil present? Yes No ~Hydrology present? Yes
Hydrophytic vegetation present? ~No
Percent ofFAC, FACW, and OBL species: I CO ')0
Is ~e site a wetland? Yes , N,o -~,
Rationale: ~ O. :e:r-il\d (o..~
NO,k-
TEST HOLE #
q
OF f
ri
- -
~ = =
I ::::.=
.- - -
~~.
LOCATION OF TEST HOLE
F-LlS+ of itt4f7 - sw CMIA€."
of (Jtyflf. I .
SEE REVERSE FOR VEGETATION
Wiltermood Associates, Inc.
1015 SW Harper Road
Port Orchard, W A 98367
(360) 876-2403
--.------- -
COMMON WETLAND AND NON-WETLAND VEGETATION
Dominant Tree Species
0/... lo"er % cover
pacific willow Saliz laJitmdra FACW .s. Sitka spruce ~I ~V\k.d Pieea sitchensi.r FAC
-
_ Oregon ash Fraximu lad/alia FACW ..,g;,. Wmem red eedar kJ Thuja plicala FAC
Quaking aspen Populus tr.mulaides FAC+ _ Cascara qJ I (l,v' I/JuJmmu pur:Uriana FAC-
::s:: Red aid... Alnus rubra FAC _ Bigleafmaple Aar mm:roplryllum FACU
.lG. Black cottonwood Populus oolsamifera FAC _ Western hemlock rsuga het.rophylla FACU
- Scouler'. willow Salix scou/eriana FAC ...:2 Do.glas 6r- r lo",fJ Pseudotsuga menziesii FACU
_ Other tree species present:
Dominant Shrub Species
- Hardhack Spiraea douglasil FACW - Scot-, broom Cytisw .Jcoparira FACU
_ Red Osier Dogwood Cornw .Ira/ani/era FACW _ Evergreen huckleberry Yacc;nium ovatwn FACU
_ Black twinberry Lonkera involucrata FAC+ _ Himalayan blackberry Rubus discolor FACU
- Devil's dub Oploporwx horridus FAC+ _Sala! Gaultheria shalloll FACU
_ Salmonberry Rubus spectabili$ FAC _Indian phnn Oem/aria cera.riforme.s FACU
- Nootka rose Rosa nutkana FAC _ Hazelnut Corylus comutQ FACU
_ Vine maple AceT circinatum FAC- _ Red huckleberry Yaccinium parvlfoliunr UPL
_ English ivy Hedera helix FACU _ Oregon grape BerberU nervosa UPL
_ Red elderberry Sambucus racemosa FACU _ Ocean spray H%discw discolor UPL
_ Snowbcny Symphoricarpos a/bus FACU
_ Other shrub species prescnt;
Domiuanl Forb Species
_ Skuok cabbage Lysichilum americanum OBL _ Stinging nettle Urtica diocia FAC+
- Cattail Typha lotifolia OBL _ Spring beauty Claytonia sibirica FAC
_ Water parsley Oenanthe sonnen/roa OBL _ Velv.. gJ3SS HolctLJ lanatw FAC
_ Slough sedge Carex obnupta OBL _ Lady rem Alhyrium filiz:f.mi/UJ FAC
- Small fruited bulrush Scirpus microcarpus OBL d.5 Horsetail EquisetlU7l aTVf!nse FAC
_ Tall manna grass Glyceria elata FACW _ Youtl1-on-age To/meia menziesii FAC
_ Sawbeak sedge Carex stipala FACW - Cat's ear Hypochaeris radica/a FACU
- Rushes Juncra Jpp. FACW _ rroiling blackberry Rubus ursinus FACU
- Soft rush Juncra ejJusus FACW - Brack.en fern Pterid;um aquilinum FACU
as Creeping buttercup Ranunculw repem FACW _ Swonl rem Polystichum munitum FACU
n Reed Canary grass Phalaris arundinacea FACW _ Bleeding heart Dic:entra formosa FACU
_ Other forb species resent: .
50 ~o iV1a L<u-ec :YlL~O - un ;.J.""hri" LI
Pelcent of dominant species FAC, FACW, OBL: \ 00 1')1) UPLAND? :x WETLAND?
Is the hydrophytic vegetation erton miV Yes.)LNo_ WETLAND TYPE: Palustrine Riverine
Rationale: > SV 0;" -:p Pi CIAJ Lacustrine Estuarine
I Forested Scrub/Shrub
Emergent Open Water
Wet MeadowlPasture