The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About020623 Sources for my 2_6_23 public comment________________________________ ALERT: BE CAUTIOUS This email originated outside the organization. Do not open attachments or click on links if you are not expecting them. ________________________________ Dear Commissioners, Thanks once again for politely hearing my public comment and expressing interest in reading my sources, which are presented below. Commissioner Brotherton very reasonably wondered where I was going with my recounting of these factoids, since folks are already vaxxed and can't be unvaxxed even if they wanted to be, so this is just re-waging a recent past battle... what am I even asking the commissioners to do here? Very good question! And one I need to mull over and maybe address in a future public comment. But my 2 cents response off the top of my head is that I've felt the need to push back in my short 3 minute time against what I consider to be a great volume of dubious information being broadcast as gospel. That's why I told Commissioners about last week's startling Project Veritas revelations, pulling back the curtain on Pfizer's shoddy internal culture, with their R&D Director's cavalier admissions like "COVID is going to be a cash cow for us ... like obviously, it'd be perfect ... that is not what we say to the public". Here we are privy to a high-ranking Pharma bro bragging about unethical research and capitalizing on the suffering of his customers in order to get laid. Do folks really want a product designed by THAT guy into our DNA, with minimal scrutiny and no liability protection? The vax/booster campaign has unfortunately not ended, with our health officer promoting it again this week to 5+ years olds for whom the known risk/benefit ratio is at least 100 to 1. Neither has the push for masks ended, even though "there is just no evidence that they make any difference" (see sources below). I realize that I sound like Cassandra futilely crying my disbelieved warnings, trying to nudge folks away from trusting the untrustworthy and direct attention back to the actual research from real scientists. Perhaps all I'm asking commissioners to do here is: question authority and keep an open mind! Yours truly, Stephen Schumacher === Sources for my 2/6/23 public comment === https://rwmalonemd.substack.com/p/third-dr-j-t-walkerpfizer-project https://www.projectveritas.com Dr. Malone summary: The content and implications of the two previous videos involving Dr. Jordon Trishton Walker were stunning, as far as I am concerned, but mostly involved future (potential) risks associated with what Dr. Walker asserted were both planned and ongoing Pfizer SARS-CoV-2 research studies. With today's disclosure from the undercover investigations, we now learn more about current vaccine reproductive risk findings, Pfizer's lack of comprehension of the basis for those risks, and (according to Dr. Walker) Pfizer's leading hypothesis concerning the patho-physiologic basis for those risks. Once again, the implications are stunning and broad ranging, consistent with what many physicians are beginning to suspect, and once again Dr. Walker (Pfizer Global Director of Research and Development- Strategic Operations and mRNA Scientific Planning at the time of the interview) appears to not fully comprehend those implications. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-FK17NU4_r8&t=7s This 18-minute video from respected Dr. John Campbell can be easily viewed at 2x speed. I most appreciated Campbell pointing out that overall risk of serious cardiac risk is 1 in 800 (according to Pfizer's original own data per "Vaccine" journal), whereas Pfizer says "Risk is highest in males 12 through 17 years of age" ... so what's their risk? 1 in 400? 1 in 100? We can only guess, since Pfizer doesn't release these specific figures, but it is ha "incredibly incredibly rare." Campbell then compares that to UK data showing the benefit of the Autumn booster for overall 16-19 year olds is preventing one hospitalization per 73,500 doses. For low-risk 16-19 year old, that's only 1 per 169,200 doses (1 per 7,500 in risk groups). So boys can take their choice: 1 in 500 (?) chance of a destroyed heart, versus 1 in 170,000 of a hospital visit. https://www.cochrane.org/news/featured-review-physical-interventions-interrupt-or-reduce-spread-respiratory-viruses https://www.eugyppius.com/p/masks-are-a-mass-social-delusion The well-regarded Cochrane Library have updated their review of the study evidence for <https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD006207.pub6/full>Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses. They look at high-quality studies on the efficacy of both masking and handwashing against Covid and influenza infection. Handwashing appears to slightly reduce your likelihood of acquiring flu and Covid, but masks do zero: We included 12 trials (10 cluster RCTs) comparing medical/surgical masks versus no masks to prevent the spread of viral respiratory illness ... Wearing masks in the community probably makes little or no difference to the outcome of influenza like illness (ILI)/COVID 19 like illness compared to not wearing masks ... Wearing masks in the community probably makes little or no difference to the outcome of laboratory confirmed influenza/SARS CoV 2 compared to not wearing masks ... There is also no evidence that N95 or FFP2 respirators are any better: The use of a N95/P2 respirators compared to medical/surgical masks probably makes little or no difference for the objective and more precise outcome of laboratory confirmed influenza infection... Restricting pooling to healthcare workers made no difference to the overall findings... https://maryannedemasi.substack.com/p/exclusive-lead-author-of-new-cochrane EXCLUSIVE: Lead author of new Cochrane review speaks out Tom Jefferson, senior associate tutor at the University of Oxford, is the lead author of a recent <https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD006207.pub6/full>Cochrane review that has 'gone viral' on social media and re-ignited one of the most divisive debates during the pandemic - face masks. DEMASI: There were so many silly mask policies. They expected 2yr olds to wear masks, and you had to wear a mask to walk into a restaurant, but you could take it off as soon as you sat down. JEFFERSON: Yes, also the 2- meter rule. Based on what? Nothing. ... There is just no evidence that they make any difference. Full stop. My job, our job as a review team, was to look at the evidence, we have done that. Not just for masks. We looked at hand washing, sterilisation, goggles etcetera... DEMASI: May I just ask a finer point on masks... it's not that masks don't work, it's just that there is no evidence they do work...is that right? JEFFERSON: There's no evidence that they do work, that's right. DEMASI: Your review also showed that n95 masks for healthcare workers did not make much difference. JEFFERSON: That's right, it makes no difference - none of it. .14 Message-ID: <5434c2fb06a14cf99703503f309737f4@mail2013ca1.internal.county.domain> Return-Path: sol@solmaker.com X-MS-Exchange-Organization-Network-Message-Id: 6f375b3a-07a7-4de5-0263-08db0879fbee X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthSource: mail2013ca1.internal.county.domain X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthAs: Anonymous