HomeMy WebLinkAboutExhibit 4 - 09A- GEOTECH REPORTStratum Group File: 8.17.20c
1
PO Box 2546, Bellingham, Washington 98227
Phone: (360) 714-9409
February 10, 2022
Jeff Bohman
Olympic Discovery Trail
Re: Engineering GeologyAssessment
Proposed Hal Baetz Viewpoint
Jefferson County, Washington
This engineering geology assessment was conducted to assess the risk of landslide and erosion
hazards and the geology related soil conditions related to the proposed viewpoint work at the
site. It is my understanding based on the proposed site plans provided (dated 12/1/21) is that the
existing driveway will be used as a construction access and a new driveway entrance will be built
approximately 150 feet to the north and a parking area, walkway, shelter and vault restroom will
be built on the site.
The Jefferson County Public Land Records shoreline slope stability map maps the area to the
east of the property as unstable slopes. The County seismic hazard map has the property located
in a seismic hazard area.
Based on my engineering geology assessment of the site the proposed development will not be at
risk from landslides or erosion and will not increase the risk of landslides or erosion on or off the
site. The seismic hazard at the site from ground shaking will not be substantially different than
other sites in the region. There is a risk that the site will be impacted by a tsunami associated
with a major magnitude earthquake on the Cascadia Subduction zone; however, given the
proposed use of the site and time for evacuation of the area to higher ground, this risk is deemed
acceptable.
Upper soils throughout the site have been altered from past site activities and the test pits
indicated soils were fill or had been graded as there was little developed top soil and the soil
structure throughout the site is consistent with modified land with significant areas of imported
soil. Soils throughout the site have been altered from past site use that included the use of the
site as pasture, development of the site with several buildings with drive and parking areas and
the use of the site as a staging area for an estuary restoration project at Snow Creek that included
and use of the site for placement of dredged and excavated soils. As such soils underlying the
site are highly variable in composition even over short distances. Recommendations for
accomplishing the development of the site with these soil conditions in mind are provided in the
conclusions and recommendations of this report.
Exhibit 4
February 10, 2022
Geologic Assessment
Stratum Group File: 1.10.22
2
This geology assessment included a field inspection of the subject property and vicinity and the
excavation of multiple hand dug test pits at the site to determine site soil engineering geology
parameters. The assessment included review of proposed plans for the site, review of documents
associated with the Snow Creek Estuary Restoration, review of historic aerial photographs dating
back to 1939, available geologic mapping, lidar (light detecting and ranging) bare earth imagery
from 2005, 2012 and 2019, and our own notes and observations we have made in the vicinity of
the site and at locations with similar geologic conditions.
GENERAL GEOLOGY
The Lidar Revised Geologic Map of the Uncas 7.5-minute Quadrangle, Clallam and Jefferson
Counties, Washington (Tabor and others, 2011) indicates (see Figure 1) that the property is
underlain by Holocene age alluvial sediment. These are alluvial sediments deposited after the last
glacial period.
Figure 1. Clipped and annotated geologic map showing the approximate subject property location. Qvt = Vashon
till; Qa5 = Holocene alluvial sediments, Qval = advance outwash lake deposits, Qvrf = fine grained recessional
glacial marine deposits or glacial lacustrine deposits, Qb = beach deposits, Qf3 = Pleistocene alluvial fan deposits.
Dashed blue line hachure between till and glacial recessional units demarcates a former shoreline late ice age
shoreline.
My observations are generally consistent with the above described mapping. However, the
subject property has been significantly modified with site grading and placement of excavated
and dredged soils from the Snow Creek Estuary Restoration project that was done 2015. As such
that the site is now modified land. The modifications took place after the geology map was
produced.
Dense silt and clay with more consistent with the fine grained recessional sediment mapped
across the road appears to extend at least under the eastern portion of the site and likely extends
at least partially under the eastern portion of the site. This difference from the map is in part
based on the scale of the mapping but also may be the result of the lower resolution 2005 lidar
Qvt
February 10, 2022
Geologic Assessment
Stratum Group File: 1.10.22
3
used for the map by Tabor and others (2011). The better 2012 lidar resolution suggests that the
eastern portion of the subject property being underlain by glacial recessional deposits.
Some of the test pits excavated on the eastern potion of the upper level area of the site
encountered very hard dense silt/clay with rocks consistent with glacial till. The presence of till
below the recessional deposits is not unexpected as the recessional sediments overlie the glacial
till.
In addition the subject property has been modified by previous development with buildings and
roads and the associated grading and drainage. The buildings have since all been removed and
the site was used for staging a construction project for the Snow Creek Estuary Restoration.
Additional grading and placement of fill took place on the site such that the site is at least in part
modified land.
SITE OBSERVATIONS
The property is accessed via a dirt access road off of Fairmont Road. The upper part of the
property is level and grass covered with some brush and weeds. At the time of my site visit in
mid December 2020, there were some wet areas with water less than an inch deep on this level
area (Figure 2).
Figure 2. Level upper portion of property
I excavated six hand dug test pits on the upland area. The test pits all encountered dense soils
throughout the upland area. Test pit depths ranged from 2 to 4 feet deep. The more easterly pits
encountered very hard silt clay with rocks consistent with undisturbed glacial till at depths of 3
feet and digging was very difficult due to the hard soil.
February 10, 2022
Geologic Assessment
Stratum Group File: 1.10.22
4
Towards the west part of the upland the test pits encountered medium hard silt with the pebbles
and rocks to depths of 4 feet. No developed top soil layer was present in any of the test pits on
the upland area. The soil was variably mottled with poorly developed mottles to no mottling
some of the soil was dark brown. The soils in all of the test pits appeared to be well compacted
fill. These observations of compacted silty soils with gravel are consistent the past use of the site
observed in historic photographs and in construction design plans and narratives for the Snow
Creek Estuary Restoration.
The level upland area is bound on the west by a moderate slope down to a pond area and on the
northwest by a moderate slope down to a saltwater estuary of grassy wetlands (Figure 3). The
slopes are on order of 15 to 20 percent. The slopes are mostly grass covered with some brush and
recent native plant plantings in blue tubes.
Figure 3. View of slope on the site
Test pits were excavated on these slope areas. Soils encountered on the slopes were highly
variable. Sand and gravel was encountered in most of the test pits, with the some test pits on the
northwest being all sand and gravel to a depth of 4 feet. Pits on the upper slopes on the west were
either silt with some gravel or had a foot or two of sand and gravel with hard dense silt below.
Soils in all of the test pits were dense and compact.
History of the Site
Based on test pits the soils throughout the site have been altered from past site activities and the
test pits indicated soils were fill or had been graded as there was little developed top soil and the
soil structure throughout the site is consistent with modified land with significant areas of
imported soil.
February 10, 2022
Geologic Assessment
Stratum Group File: 1.10.22
5
Historic aerial images of the site were reviewed to assess the past site modifications relevant to
soil stability on the site. The property was used as a pasture from at least 1939 until some in the
1950s when a home was built on the site and other small outbuildings were built. That home was
removed and a home and out buildings were built on the site in the 1970s. The home and
buildings were removed in 2010.
The Snow Creek Estuary Restoration project took place in 2015. The project entailed removing
the former railroad grade across the upper estuary and removal of accumulated sediment in part
of the estuary in order to open up tidal flow paths after past flow restrictions associated with the
old rail grade. The Snow Creek Estuary Restoration Final Design Report indicated that the
estuary sediment consists of silt to coarse gravel. This is consistent with observations in the test
pits particularly those where medium dense silt had pebbles and gravel embedded in the fill
suggesting that the excavation would have been mixed from excavation, grading and
compaction.
The specific types of soils used at the site for fill is not available. The design plans projected fill
placement on the site to vary from 0 to 15 feet and indicated that the level area would be raised
several feet from existing graded and made larger by creating the slopes now on the site. The
plans called for the fill to be compacted to 85% compaction. The oblique aerial images from
2006 before the restoration project and from 2016 after the restoration project show the extent of
the fill (Figures 4 and 5).
February 10, 2022
Geologic Assessment
Stratum Group File: 1.10.22
6
Figure 4. Oblique aerial view of site in 2006.
Figure 5. Oblique view of site in 2016 post fill placement
GEOLOGIC HAZARD EVALUATION
Landslides
The slopes above the property across Fairmount Road are not subject to landslides and there are
no indications of landslides or unstable slopes in that area. The slopes on the subject site are
moderate slopes that have compacted fill. These slopes will not be subject to landslides.
Excavation
areas
Removed rail grade
Note driveway position ends
before power pole due to
raised ground surface from
fill
February 10, 2022
Geologic Assessment
Stratum Group File: 1.10.22
7
Seismic Hazard
The seismic hazard at the site from ground shaking will not be substantially different than other
sites in the region. The fill soils underlying the site have been compacted and are in a dense
condition and will not be subject to liquefaction during a seismic event.
Deeper soils under the fill are old alluvial sediments that even if portions the old alluvial
sediments are of the grain size susceptible for liquefaction, they are old deposits that have
undergone multiple previous seismic events and therefore have as well as time to compact and
will not be susceptible to liquefaction. Furthermore the type of development proposed for the site
does not warrant mitigation for seismic hazards associated with location in an area of alluvial
sediments.
Tsunami
Tsunami modeling (Washington Geologic Survey, 2022) indicates that for an L1 magnitude 9.0
earthquake on the Cascadia Fault, inundation at High 101 near the subject property would be 33
feet (Figure 6). The model is for an extreme seismic event and may not reflect the actual event
results, but the shape and orientation of Discovery results in elevated tsunami inundation at the
head of the bay that with multiple tsunami events indicated in tidal sediments (Garrison-Laney
and Miller, 2017).
Given the proposed land use as well as the ample to evacuate to higher ground and the low
probability of the L1 magnitude 9 event, no mitigation is warranted for the tsunami potential.
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Based on my geology assessment, it is my opinion that site is not at risk from landslides and the
proposed development will not increase the risk of landslides on or off the property. The seismic
hazard at the site from ground shaking will not be substantially different than other sites in the
region. There is a risk that the site will be impacted by a tsunami associated with a major
magnitude earthquake on the Cascadia Subduction zone; however, given the proposed use of the
site and time for evacuation of the area to higher ground, this risk is deemed acceptable.
The following recommendations are in response to the items requested to be covered in Steve
Durant’s email on January 8, 2021:
- HMA Pavement, gravel surfacing and PCC (vehicular loads, pedestrian loads)
recommendations (e.g. sections), including geotextile recommendation.
- Subgrade preparation and embankment material to transition grade from Fairmount Road
(approximately 5' grade transition), including geotextile recommendation
Pavement design and drive surface design should be done by a licensed engineer specializing in
design of drive and parking for anticipated loads and traffic (I am an engineering geologist, so
this outside my area of qualification).
February 10, 2022
Geologic Assessment
Stratum Group File: 1.10.22
8
The above said, based on soil conditions encountered at the proposed new access drive ‘ramp’
down onto the level area of the site will not require unusual construction methods. Settlement
should be minor as long any build up of the ramp is underlain by well drained subgrade below
the driving surface material. The fill soils at this location are not as thick as elsewhere on the site
and the underlying glacial marine drift or glacial lacustrine sediment at this location was elevated
relative to other areas on the level prior to fill soils emplacement. The glacial sediment at this
elevated area would have undergone self consolidation from wetting and drying cycles and thus
settlement is a lower concern at this location.
Selection of the parking surface material should consider that long term differential settlement is
a likely condition at this site due to 1) the highly variable fill soils from the excavated estuary
and former rail grade, 2) fill soils vary in thickness across the site, 3) Potential for wet glacial
recession marine or lake sediments that underlie the fill will take many years to compact from
heavy loads such as the fill soils that were placed at variable depths over the site 4), potential
presence of buried zones of soft soils or buried organics at depth that can cause surface
settlement as these soils compact over time.
- Provide preliminary recommendations for site preparation and earthwork including depth of
stripping, suitability of on-site soils for use as structural fill, constraints for wet weather
construction, and fill placement and compaction (structural fill) requirements.
Stripping depth to remove organic upper soils within the area proposed for development will
generally be just a few inches to remove the top layer thin top soil. Soils throughout the site had
been compacted and compact soils were encountered at 4 inches or less throughout the site.
On site soils are not suitable for structural fill as the silt content is such that compaction for
structural fill requirements will be very difficult for moisture sensitive soils such as the silt soils
(ML) encountered at the site.
Due to the silty soils throughout the proposed parking and drive areas wet weather work is not
advisable as soils will become very soft and muddy during disturbance and compaction of the
subgrade will be difficult to achieve.
A woven polyester geotextile16oz biaxial fabric or equivalent should be laid over the compacted
subgrade soils of the parking area. 6 inches of crushed drain rock and compacted base class 1
base coarse should underlie the drive surface material. The specifics of the base coarse should be
determined by the engineer depending on the drive surface used.
- Foundation recommendations for vault toilet, and memorial structure
The vault toilet and memorial structure are relative small structures and should be supported with
rigid foundations such that will allow for the differential settlement. Soil bearing values should
be 1,500 psf due. Higher values are not recommended for this site due to the silt soils and
possible presence of soft glacial marine and glacial lake sediments at depths below the fill.
Sediments.
February 10, 2022
Geologic Assessment
Stratum Group File: 1.10.22
9
- French drain section recommendation, including geotextile recommendation
- Assumes Jefferson County will not require infiltration testing (PIT). Geotech still to provide
discussion of site soil properties and soil analysis (grain size distribution; moisture content
determinations), as well as geotech's assessment that site soils not conducive to infiltration
BMPs other than dispersion.
- Groundwater relative to proposed improvements and recommendations for mitigation (French
drain?)
Site soils at the surface and to the depths of the test pits were consistently silt with some gravel
(ML). These soils will not perform well with infiltration as the silt content is high. If infiltration
is used an infiltration rate of 0.13 inches per hour should be used (Massman, 2003) and per
Western Washington Stormwater Manual.
The glacial marine or lake sediments underlying the fill are silt/clays and hence deep French
drains will not be successful at this site. In the design plans for the Snow Creek Estuary
Restoration, exiting drains were noted in the plans associated with the former buildings on the
site that routed perched water off the site. These drains were called out for removal but indicated
that perched water was an issue at the for home site area now covered with fill soils.
Based on soil conditions, stormwater plans should designed for dispersal rather than on site
infiltration. The proposed dispersion trenches will allow for most water to infiltrate and any
overflow will be across well vegetated moderate slopes that will not be subject to erosion and
water will infiltrate where coarser grained soils are resent on the lower slopes.
The proposed swale between the proposed development and Fairmont Road will direct any
perched water that develops on the silty fill soils down the moderate slope to a discharge at a
French drain. The slopes below this area very moderate and vegetated and any water will
disperse across this area.
Stratum Group appreciates the opportunity to be of service to you. Should you have any
questions regarding this assessment please contact our office at (360) 714-9409.
Sincerely yours,
Stratum Group
Dan McShane, L.E.G., M.Sc.
Licensed Engineering Geologist
Stratum Group File: 8.17.20c
10
1939
February 10, 2022
Geologic Assessment
Stratum Group File: 1.10.22
11
1950
February 10, 2022
Geologic Assessment
Stratum Group File: 1.10.22
12
1956
February 10, 2022
Geologic Assessment
Stratum Group File: 1.10.22
13
1957
February 10, 2022
Geologic Assessment
Stratum Group File: 1.10.22
14
1965
February 10, 2022
Geologic Assessment
Stratum Group File: 1.10.22
15
1977
1979
February 10, 2022
Geologic Assessment
Stratum Group File: 1.10.22
16
1990
February 10, 2022
Geologic Assessment
Stratum Group File: 1.10.22
17
1996
February 10, 2022
Geologic Assessment
Stratum Group File: 1.10.22
18
1997
February 10, 2022
Geologic Assessment
Stratum Group File: 1.10.22
19
2002
February 10, 2022
Geologic Assessment
Stratum Group File: 1.10.22
20
2004
February 10, 2022
Geologic Assessment
Stratum Group File: 1.10.22
21
2006
February 10, 2022
Geologic Assessment
Stratum Group File: 1.10.22
22
2009
February 10, 2022
Geologic Assessment
Stratum Group File: 1.10.22
23
2016