Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
050723 WFC Legal Victory Marks Turning Point for Southern Resident Orcas and Wild Chinook
________________________________ ALERT: BE CAUTIOUS This email originated outside the organization. Do not open attachments or click on links if you are not expecting them. ________________________________ Federal Court halts overharvest of Chinook in Alaska jeopardizing the survival of the endangered Southern Resident killer whales and wild Chinook <https://default.salsalabs.org/Xe2ba1ff0-2331-40fc-b0c0-e36f981ce7d8/e1f9ba72-dc83-4f20-90cd-07d9d1ee41b3> <https://default.salsalabs.org/T67ec6f6a-52b5-4598-8c09-4ec15202372f/e1f9ba72-dc83-4f20-90cd-07d9d1ee41b3> <https://default.salsalabs.org/T38a7ab67-e45e-432c-b46a-3fb8addb3e8a/e1f9ba72-dc83-4f20-90cd-07d9d1ee41b3> <https://default.salsalabs.org/e2ba1ff0-2331-40fc-b0c0-e36f981ce7d8/feef8908-c50b-4d7a-aa92-f611ae29eb48.png> Southern Resident Killer Whale J19 “Sachi” leaping in Puget Sound, August 2022 (Wild Orca, Taken under NMFS permit # 26288, wildorca.org <https://default.salsalabs.org/Tad358db6-d02b-4273-82b5-0d1058 a68066/e1f9ba72-dc83-4f20-90cd-07d9d1ee41b3> ) WILD FISH CONSERVANCY'S LEGAL VICTORY MARKS TURNING POINT FOR SOUTHERN RESIDENT ORCA & WILD CHINOOK RECOVERY "After a hard-fought, four year legal challenge against the federal government, state of Alaska, and Alaska's commercial fishing industry, Wild Fish Conservancy is thrilled to share a major landmark victory that is being celebrated coastwide as one of the most impactful recovery actions for wild Chinook and Southern Resident killer whales in decades." Emma Helverson, Executive Director, Wild Fish Conservancy In an international, coastwide environmental victory, Seattle's federal Court issued a landmark order that will immediately halt the overharvest and interception of Chinook salmon in Southeast Alaska that has persisted for decades and is jeopardizing the survival of the endangered Southern Resident killer whales and wild Chinook populations coastwide. Earlier this week, U.S. District Judge Richard A. Jones issued a major final ruling <https://default.salsalabs.org/T4afb291d-4770-4b1d-8f0f-34c39001a1b8/e1f9ba72-dc83-4f20-90cd-07d9d1ee41b3> in a lawsuit <https://default.salsalabs.org/Tbd545399-43c7-4ae1-ba97-135626977d1e/e1f9ba72-dc83-4f20-90cd-07d9d1ee41b3> filed by Wild Fish Conservancy in March 2020 challenging NOAA Fisheries' for authorizing overharvest in Southeast Alaska that the agency acknowledges is threatening the survival of both the Southern Resident killer whales and wild Chinook populations coastwide. In a previous ruling in August, the Court overwhelmingly agreed that NOAA Fisheries violated environmental law when they allowed the Chinook troll fishery in Southeast Alaska to harvest at unsustainable levels that are pushing the endangered Southern Resident killer whales (SRKW) and threatened wild Chinook closer to extinction. This week, the Court agreed that given these serious violations, halting the summer and winter seasons of the commercial fishery is the most appropriate remedy to protect both iconic and imperiled species, until NOAA Fisheries can correct and address these violations. Most people are surprised to learn that up to 97% of all Chinook harvested in the Southeast Alaska troll fishery actually originate from rivers throughout Oregon, Washington, and British Columbia. Roughly half of these fish would migrate back to the Columbia River basin. These fish are being intercepted during their historical migration, preventing them from reaching their home spawning grounds or migrating back down into southern waters where the Southern Resident killer whales encounter them. The vast majority of these Chinook are from priority stocks for the orca population. This significant decision will finally provide the starving Southern Resident population far greater access to their primary prey, marking a turning point for their recovery. Following years of inaction by our federal government to address the whale's prey crisis, the Court's decision is being celebrated as what is likely the most important and impactful recovery action for the Southern Resident population since they were first identified as 'Endangered' in the early 2000's. In the face of wild Chinook populations collapsing in rivers from California to Alaska, the Court's landmark decision is also being hailed as a major victory for wild Chinook recovery at an international and coastwide scale. Beyond the short-term and immediate benefit to the whales, the Court's decision will allow far more wild Chinook to return home and reach their natal spawning grounds, aiding the recovery of Chinook populations in rivers throughout Oregon, Washington, and British Columbia. Allowing more wild Chinook to reach spawning grounds provides the greatest chance of restoring the larger, more diverse, and more fecund life histories of wild Chinook the whales evolved to eat and which are fundamental for their long-term recovery. <https://default.salsalabs.org/e2ba1ff0-2331-40fc-b0c0-e36f981ce7d8/1419f620-0343-4b8f-ac3f-2d96c067722f.jpg> Photo: Jeremy Koreski We want to emphasize that Alaskan fishers are not at fault for NOAA’s chronic mismanagement of this fishery, and we are sincerely sympathetic to the burden this decision will pose to Southeast Alaskan communities. The fault lies with government fisheries managers for consistently approving unsustainable harvest plans that have failed fishers, wild salmon, and Southern Resident killer whales. Beyond the harm to Alaskan fishers, by allowing the overharvest and interception of Chinook from rivers throughout the coast to occur over so many decades, NOAA's management has impacted and harmed many other tribal, First Nation, and coastal communities in British Columbia, Washington, and Oregon whose local Chinook are being harvested far from home. In many cases, these communities have been forced to disproportionately shoulder the burden of wild salmon and orca recovery, while sacrificing their own cultural, social, and economic relationship with wild salmon. The Court's decision is finally addressing this historic inequity and restoring control to communities coastwide over the destiny of salmon recovery in their home watersheds. Since the Southern Residents were first listed in the early 2000's, Wild Fish Conservancy has spent thousands of hours working to raise awareness of the role overharvest has played in both species decline and seeking every possible avenue to educate and advocate for decision-makers to take action to address this urgent problem. Nearly two decades later, with little progress made and both species continuing to decline toward extinction, we knew we had no choice left but to take legal action to hold the government accountable for putting commercial harvest ahead of its duty to protect and restore threatened and endangered species. We applaud the Court's decision that will have wide sweeping and long-lasting benefits for the Southern Residents, wild salmon recovery, and communities throughout our coast. We want to sincerely thank our staff, attorneys, expert witnesses, standing declarants, and our entire community of members and supporters. Without your dedication and support, this incredible success would never have been possible. Much like our recent environmental victory <https://default.salsalabs.org/T4eb2874b-e241-40a2-aa82-0e6ea70d583b/e1f9ba72-dc83-4f20-90cd-07d9d1ee41b3> banning commercial net pen aquaculture in Washington state, this landmark ruling is another example of how your support is leading to some of the most impactful recovery actions for these species at an international and coastwide scale. We hope you'll consider making a donation today to help make more environmental victories possible for wild fish and all who depend on them. Keep reading below to dive deeper into background of this landmark case. <https://default.salsalabs.org/T594f0d54-baf5-46ae-8175-2510b28d9f14/e1f9ba72-dc83-4f20-90cd-07d9d1ee41b3> <https://default.salsalabs.org/e2ba1ff0-2331-40fc-b0c0-e36f981ce7d8/7512a5a4-6a02-4394-8e2c-0e8ec29eb500.png> Photo by: Conrad Gowell <https://default.salsalabs.org/T01edf86f-280e-4690-a92e-17c5c08337cc/e1f9ba72-dc83-4f20-90cd-07d9d1ee41b3> A LANDMARK CASE FOR RECOVERY Wild Fish Conservancy first brought this lawsuit after NOAA Fisheries released their most recent Endangered Species Act analysis evaluating the Southeast Alaska Chinook troll fishery's impact on threatened and endangered species. In that biological opinion <https://default.salsalabs.org/T8d638639-da69-4fcf-8dfc-33e59cb8c52c/e1f9ba72-dc83-4f20-90cd-07d9d1ee41b3> , NOAA admitted that over the last decade and persisting today, Chinook harvest is occurring at levels that are unsustainable for the long-term survival and reproductive success of both threatened wild Chinook populations and endangered Southern Resident killer whales. Instead of issuing a jeopardy finding or requiring reductions in harvest, NOAA authorized the harvest to continue at these unsustainable levels relying on speculative mitigation measures the agency claimed could offset this serious harm. In March 2020, Wild Fish Conservancy filed suit in Seattle's federal Court against NOAA for allowing overharvest the agency admits is harming federally protected orcas and wild Chinook to continue and challenging the agency's flawed and unproven mitigation. In summary judgement <https://default.salsalabs.org/T87343fad-4eb4-4875-a46e-f09ae741bfbd/e1f9ba72-dc83-4f20-90cd-07d9d1ee41b3> in August, the Court overwhelmingly agreed the mitigation was insufficient and therefore NOAA's biological opinion and approval of the fishery seriously violated the Endangered Species Act (ESA). The Court also agreed NOAA violated the law by ignoring their responsbility to conduct comprehensive environmental review of the proposed mitigation to ensure it would not further harm wild Chinook or killer whale recovery. This review would have included opportunities for public input and an evaluation of alternatives, such as reductions in harvest. This week, U.S. District Judge Richard A. Jones issued a final ruling <https://default.salsalabs.org/T2768fefc-6509-4435-8f89-ba0b75906457/e1f9ba72-dc83-4f20-90cd-07d9d1ee41b3> in the case remanding NOAA Fisheries’ inadequate biological opinion and ordering the agency to address the serious underlying violations of environmental law previously found by the Court. In the interim, the Court agreed that halting the summer and winter seasons of the Southeast Alaska Chinook troll fishery is the most appropriate remedy to protect the endangered Southern Residents from further harm. The Court stated: “Though there is uncertainty as to how much prey would ultimately reach the SRKW, the record before the Court suggests that closure of the fisheries meaningfully improves prey available to the SRKW, as well as SRKW population stability and growth, under any scenario.” We applaud the Court for this precautionary and science-based decision that is already being celebrated by communities throughout the Pacific Coast. <https://default.salsalabs.org/e2ba1ff0-2331-40fc-b0c0-e36f981ce7d8/424482fb-f8f7-4d5f-94d7-5507c44c3272.jpg> A TURNING POINT FOR THE SOUTHERN RESIDENTS The Southern Resident killer whales were first listed as Endangered in 2005 under the U.S. Endangered Species Act (ESA) and in 2001 under Canada's Species at Risk Act (SARA). Today, there only 73 individuals in the population, an alarming decrease from nearly 100 only 25-years ago. Reduced prey availability, specifically large and abundant wild Chinook, has been identified by killer whale experts and NOAA as the primary cause of their decline. Research has shown an alarming 69% of Southern Resident killer whale pregnancies are aborted due to insufficient Chinook salmon. The decline of the population has also been found in a recent study to contribute to symptoms of inbreeding depression. Local killer whale scientists Dr. Deborah Giles (Science and Research Director, Wild Orca <https://default.salsalabs.org/Ta3fae019-f16b-4ccd-9dcf-992c42eb20e6/e1f9ba72-dc83-4f20-90cd-07d9d1ee41b3> ) submitted expert declarations as part of this case speaking to the health and condition of the whales. In her final declaration <https://default.salsalabs.org/T9cfe9765-24e0-4abe-b3df-5bc1341af166 /e1f9ba72-dc83-4f20-90cd-07d9d1ee41b3> , she concluded: "It is my professional opinion that SRKW, under existing conditions, are not getting enough Chinook salmon throughout their entire range. Overall conditions appear to have worsened as Chinook returns through the Salish Sea, but also to the Columbia River Basin, have been insufficient to maintain their daily prey energy requirements throughout the past few years. I believe SRKW need an immediate increase in the abundance of Chinook available to them to avoid functional extinction, as the current low birth rate, with high early mortality is simply unsustainable." In a separate expert declaration <https://default.salsalabs.org/T0908a1cc-c646-44bc-b59f-f1f49e480735/e1f9ba72-dc83-4f20-90cd-07d9d1ee41b3> evaluating the effect of the troll fishery’s harvest on the Southern Resident population, conservation biologist Dr. Robert E. Lacy projected closing the fishery would increase prey availability by approximately 6%, which would be enough to stabilize the population and stop their decline toward extinction, though additional actions would be required to begin to grow the population. Stopping the decline of the whales toward extinction is the highest priority toward recovery efforts. While there are many factors beyond harvest that need to be addressed, Dr. Lacy's findings clearly demonstrate how significantly overharvest in Southeast Alaska was affecting the whale's prey availability and validates why the Court’s decision this week is so critically important to the survival of this population. "This is unbelievable news, yet so long in coming. The high pregnancy failure rate within the Southern Resident killer whale population is linked to poor nutrition, so having more fish returning to their home waters in British Columbia, Washington, and Oregon, will increase the whales’ prey base and improve their chances of giving birth to healthy calves.” Dr. Deborah Giles, Wild Orca | wildorca.org <https://default.salsalabs.org/T6e9022b8-09d3-40f6-9504-8175f440c51f/e1f9ba72-dc83-4f20-90cd-07d9d1ee41b3> <https://default.salsalabs.org/e2ba1ff0-2331-40fc-b0c0-e36f981ce7d8/7a7b98e3-fd87-4d90-b7fe-a8a98800b4a0.jpg> THE SOUTHEAST ALASKA TROLL FISHERY Given the fishery at issue in this case occurs in marine waters outside of Southeast Alaska, most people are surprised to learn that the vast majority of fish harvested in the fishery are not Chinook that originate from Alaskan rivers. To the contrary, harvest data has consistently shown for decades that every year up to 97% of all Chinook harvested in the Southeast Alaska troll fishery actually originate from rivers throughout Oregon, Washington, and British Columbia. Roughly half of these fish would migrate back to the Columbia River basin. Much like migratory birds, wild Chinook populations evolved over thousands of years to migrate from rivers throughout the Pacific Northwest to the food-rich, marine rearing habitat or 'salmon nursery', located in the ocean outside of Southeast Alaska. The salmon nursery is where the Southeast Alaska troll fishery has been authorized to harvest by NOAA Fisheries over 10 months of the year. Majority of the Chinook harvested in the fishery are from priority stocks for the Southern Residents and many are listed as Threatened by the U.S. and Canada. These fish are being intercepted during their migration, preventing them from reaching their home spawning grounds or migrating back down into southern waters where the Southern Resident killer whales encounter them. As a result of yesterday’s decision, approximately 172,000 Chinook that would have been harvested or indirectly killed in the 2023 summer and winter seasons of the Southeast Alaska troll fishery will now be able to continue their historical migration south to home spawning grounds and into the whale’s key foraging areas. The underlying harvest issues in this case are not an anomaly, but rather just one example that demonstrates the problems caused when salmon are harvested in the ocean where it is impossible to avoid unintentionally harming threatened and endangered populations or intercepting high proportions of salmon from rivers coastwide. Scientists are increasingly calling for harvest reform measures that shift harvest out of the ocean and into fisheries in or near each river of origin where salmon return, providing fisheries managers and coastal communities the ability to manage recovery with far greater accuracy and success. Learn more about Wild Fish Conservancy's work and research <https://default.salsalabs.org/T1ed8b34c-eb91-4d3e-839f-0389fc78638d/e1f9ba72-dc83-4f20-90cd-07d9d1ee41b3> helping to advance responsible, resilient commercial fisheries and consider making a donation to support these ongoing efforts. <https://default.salsalabs.org/e2ba1ff0-2331-40fc-b0c0-e36f981ce7d8/0d4a6421-2e51-46fd-b0c8-e69ffa5e8cbc.png> Share this Update <https://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fwildfishconservancy.salsalabs.org%2Flegal-victory-for-srkw-wild-chinook> <https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwildfishconservan cy.salsalabs.org%2Flegal-victory-for-srkw-wild-chinook> <https://www.pinterest.com/pin/find/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwildfishconservancy.salsalabs.org%2Flegal-victory-for-srkw-wild-chinook> <https://www.linkedin.com/shareArticle?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwildfishconservancy.salsalabs.org%2Flegal-victory-for-srkw-wild-chinook> <https://www.tumblr.com/widgets/share/tool?canonicalUrl=https% 3A%2F%2Fwildfishconservancy.salsalabs.org%2Flegal-victory-for-srkw-wild-chinook> <mailto:?&body=https%3A%2F%2Fwildfishconservancy.salsalabs.org%2Flegal-victory-for-srkw-wild-chinook> Further Reading: * To feed endangered orcas, Alaska ordered to stop intercepting B.C.-bound salmon | Times Colonist <https://default.salsalabs.org/Tda3e3934-7108-4bbb-bdc5-85af77dc847e/e1f9ba72-dc83-4f20-90cd-07d9d1e e41b3> * 'Win' for Southern Resident killer whales a 'major blow' to fishing industry | Fox 13 <https://default.salsalabs.org/T863d059e-7824-44a7-ae12-b8518d8cc1af/e1f9ba72-dc83-4f20-90cd-07d9d1ee41b3> * Celebrating a Landmark Legal Victory for Southern Resident Killer Whales and Wild Chinook Recovery | Wild Fish Conservancy <https://default.salsalabs.org/Tb93aed33-9961-4c29-a466-213501973bde/e1f9 ba72-dc83-4f20-90cd-07d9d1ee41b3> * Judge faults federal plan to protect orcas from Alaska salmon harvests | The Seattle Times <https://default.salsalabs.org/T224d2f8b-9551-4c9c-bb1d-aad2c92cbf29/e1f9ba72-dc83-4f20-90cd-07d9d1ee41b3> * Judge blasts ‘mitigation’ that would imperil both orca and salmon | Courthouse News Service <https://default.salsalabs.org/Ta73ac424-3f62-44ad-ae7f-4bc2c09549f5/e1f9ba72-dc83-4f20-90cd-07d9d1ee41b3 > * Lawsuit seeks to block Southeast Alaska troll fishing to increase salmon for orcas | Puget Sound Institute <https://default.salsalabs.org/Ta8244afc-9a30-4c71-93a5-c771f37fc2d5/e1f9ba72-dc83-4f20-90 cd-07d9d1ee41b3> * Puget Sound Orcas are Starving. Is the Solution Shutting Down Alaskan Chinook Fisheries? | Post Alley <https://default.salsalabs.org/T2aecb3d5-da5a-4640-b0c5-9fb03a138bb6/e1f9ba72-dc83-4f20-90cd-07 d9d1ee41b3> <https://default.salsalabs.org/e2ba1ff0-2331-40fc-b0c0-e36f981ce7d8/a004b67f-8ff0-434f-a022-3cfcbb2d8f00.jpg> Photo: Miles Ritter, licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 2.0 <https://default.salsalabs.org/T1e0a31f3-b556-4af4-8f66-3b04baa58c41/e1f9ba72-dc83-4f20-90cd-07d9d1ee41b3> We want to thank you and our entire community of members and supporters! This landmark accomplishment is just one example of what your support makes possible. We hope you'll consider making a donation today to support our continued work protecting and restoring the Northwest's ecosystems and the diverse species that depend on them. <https://default.salsalabs.org/T5707375c-407b-46d8-8110-76715b6927fa/e1f9ba72-dc83-4f20-90cd-07d9d1ee41b3> Wild Fish Conservancy PO Box 402 | Duvall, Washington 98019 425.788.1167 | info@wildfishconservancy.org Follow Us <https://www.facebook.com/wildfishconservancy> <https://twitter.com/intent/follow?screen_name=wildfishNW> <https://www.instagram.com/wildfishconservancy/> <https://www.youtube.com/user/wild fishconservancy?sub_confirmation=1> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/wild-fish-conservancy/about/> Having trouble viewing this email? View it in your web browser <https://wildfishconservancy.salsalabs.org/legal-victory-for-srkw-wild-chinook?wvpId=e1f9ba72-dc83-4f20-90cd-07d9d1ee41b3> Unsubscribe <https://wildfishconservancy.salsalabs.org/manage-your-subscription?eId=e2ba1ff0-2331-40fc-b0c0-e36f981ce7d8&eType=EmailBlastContent&sId=e1f9ba72-dc83-4f20-90cd-07d9d1ee41b3> or Manage Your Preferences <https://wildfishconservancy.salsalabs.org/manage-your-subscription?eId=e2ba1ff0-2331-40fc-b0c0-e36f981ce7d8&eType=EmailBlastContent&sId=e1f9ba72-dc83-4f20-90cd-07d9d1ee4 1b3> ᮿ糏墿奟ṯ῟峯゚꽝뽞콟�「ཤὥ替⬯ᎏ榏㑟欏㡿㤟O꽮뽯꼪�뼠ウu郐㎛ᶰㇰモ䃣扤㉜略닠㞀뇢㥡㙣ᕡᜀ⎏뽿輤鼥꼦뼧콽�缳ﺱ耰倣᱑᳖㌅劰ᰒ⅌ꎄ渺삦〵ꣿ�鿀厠텄㱱㲰簐灥ゅ삟恔畖쩕䭯䪰Ꙡ㫀쇬쩕嚏Ⳁ䦐 㪲捳瀼线嗱䯙ꚳ䶰蔱碱䔝ꇿ賃亀蔠鲵齠솆㑞쑝ꇗ썖腔ᦅ䇿䈟䌯茿蓯蛿鰏黿/ᅠ⾠㾡澌皍하徎�鯿鲏梟榟檯璿泏ꋟﻼꌸ拯꙯攇㱰Ṱ餠㝢坩ေ煷䧰亰䔠䃑煨毰礠耼�E耼ိ섖䥩Ꙁ�浭ꃭ偶뀺穯 �扭။烬ꉿ㱳墐 נּ恺ꆁ累粀౾ᅬ径澅뼬櫪侇忼濽翾㶟ᒿ斷晟杯獿ッ罴轵龗꽷�ὺ很釿熟牟陯靟顯ꍿ髏쾟챸ቌワҞ桔耴გ翿钡网ㅀ肐云㒐媀c၅烬护큿ႀ熫ㇻ脐眱ၿ끉慿愿㒂膿�塡䭁グ⻱■蔚蚿蟏ꃟꄟꈯ_侣徤澥羦辧龨릝偾鹿襯뒟噀羠❒㋿聐�䗠䬠긐Ả缑벐搠遼쁖酘셾乤�쉾㚮燄恊텮䗠ff퇛䁿㱰ᝰ례얰缳뾱䁉んꀩ㋅耝ေ艎癡멨鎰✰烬ꃈ偘ケん‖쒁샞ㅍK낶囿ㆠ罡䤁噐羠﮲dž삷꽭뎜둟쁯섿oྌᾍ⾎㾏侐徑澒羓铿랏롟뭯멟뮏骟鯯龾迖 ⾟�翥퓧烅쒍晱瀨䁅祥ᙊ0噗婳久扶洀灚㍚楍ŏ倏䱤䩃据镭쁆䩯臬啖წㆈ公惯摶 ㉑甹滀聉灪䤷剭艐䙆䣐䉒坢셆満啒塥求郰漎傯ꃭ䃰䥓䥳済桂郭瑆塚姰㕠喐íㅩ○䤰ᵩ汑聢則婊䥃ௐレ僱䨁奬簳祖鿯꿰뿱쿲�塹坚瀠郬饤藹楑凭歬釸痂탷獸卦倝郭嘰摪ﱘ㕐ꁮ䝕祆你儀cメ博郳扊2硐契ꃿô魕˽壘滀⬀惶ǻ䠀〆䡖ϑ妰琲˽䙄쏰勺�湑䕬郼뀅ﻗ涠儃喙ǐ䟿उ됇䝚ॖ壀搰㊱烸郬乆ܰ溓䔰⁀桺䁉 䕦�ڰ嗰⽰⿎烍끈끊怱䴓ダ珠⤮枠启㔀〷㌷㔷ݣ恆怑兆搶ⴸ☸㌱䞠㘀켷戰Զꂃ䠷⾰ㅥ㥦奃흀ⶠ捤䘸㐀曬ሲ䖠掠큙怑遅䗑无㑥큆㌳滠ーㅅ休弒끈倿䁅㾿읐ᣐ�䫑䕐彀ⅎ㌇᳧�拠〨㔬㏤㌬⦡尻怢㰡懲啷瀠惛䁉삮ꄩ㯾䈝輜닞錝픜쁍媿ᴯ侀摐悇⤠�箠奈䥌䭎༠၏ᙟ콯缗輓鼔ꈕ絽鄢膃쎰尰晣就榉앭썑䔰㍀寠⊀逿䔭䔢㓀ꅇ됲ⴱ聆⼵➰晀償⥫⟰数䀨䡦傰㢰揈换捲㼏津攼夲⡀⾠㏀㤳İ昰퀦焰쀧㍥ゝ㤰逧䁏―⼸伯ンㅟ佰䟠峗兽 �텞晎ポ⏝遀奯䵠켮큈끏婝℠劂绿ᶑ厀⤃喰庒�왱ﺀ뻑졒匀䔂㽀꾋忐ඃ�茍䎯忒濓翔迕⽈꿗뿘㋺㊶估倿乏ᢵ瞠qནƶ�兑㫀搠秾꽔뽕읖퀥ཇ뽍壿兿尯匏呏彟噏坿マ㽢꽙뽚콛㽥콨འ懿氟挏洿滯替杯灿߯齩惚ⴡ嬭㥩å木䃣ꂮ㤠⤀⡼䕉崩�퍪恷쵛瞡嶰職뵰矿砯派现礶機瀏疿翿㽭侀鷙ꀘႬᄖ=㍟쀘ザ㍦〕耧㐹蘻✀㑁怟䀘 㝢⣏蝰蔐㇀㑀㠵㪧D改逺邃ွ㇅脺濤꽴떏ꩀ꾠㤰감ᨭ痁湭Ꜹ쌽觿諯翿�筑硏率䁓ᅱˠ肐齽⾒㾓䚔䂕㣴რ䄮⁰モᄚᾖ龋뽳멂멋豅쿿鑑躴踅뚴�잰�蹩ⷠ烜玢깳₰`⚣섚₣ꀸ䀠熶탌⽰ꐡ规ꕕ骓뛕曰瓾�礹㠹冚驀蒕郻貪摡傌낡ポる⋽玠䁿⼬ツ庠罰꾯蓿ꝛ覿透꺯貿贿蕏멁�牀龧侵ܜ選Oྷ뾜쾝�ᅠ넚ᇤ㸽玠쾤�▅쀦〳ㇼᠸ�ᢀ蛀ᕑ㜠谰㔸逵胟㈳ဧ挹㐵⾻㾼䗋ᪿꇁ㊰�촐뢠懁䃣Ꜻꥒ㺩갚괿뽏눟뼿羰辱忔禄֎芢ꍥ纰ꑩ⊐� ꐁ⌣癠㶯쬀�㣵暧燅㈭⎐胞✺པ戀ٵ�䵐❓䠬⋷㳐㰀ⰲ瀥耣სြ飝㭐㏜⋡㼴ᩡﳄ㈣鏠워뿋㾾ΐ澸맿��㰎ᨍ!⿌柡鿢꿣激翁迂ꇿ왔ꘟꬌ톏툯ퟟO濕迗튄뿮翺쿤鮹蔝㤥郊)‷ⴵ漳ᆇㄧ뀵퀩♢❠㋐揤愀Դ蛀�羯鿧꿨뿩쿪�怕ﱭ〠픍鿮༁뿰쿱ﳟ���쪵ᢸ柁䛥痀킛渺熎워ـ㽯轠ᨠ㷐 ∛耶︷ᯕ㷠ᡥ꧱㾬ーę礜䨊㊫/埾ủⶏ⚡╮⇰❜率⊰产Å䯧セ⽲聆뇚꽳忾セ弫臿舟ⸯ澟ﶟㅯ犏⫏/Ἣ輴㼭Ἰ弯漰弻輲㷿㸿㕏㚿 䃏㠿㧯䓿ἼཇὈ伿iཋ罂轃䳿竿頯砏魿勏厯粿录ཆq㽉作⾄┄愪僄Ⅱ㛀悤攴蛯۰ݰ즠斐䃊旾胊‗郠뿊迡弞僿ʏ뤯躏輿빏ᜑꐘ几錙뙭耚찀᭒烀᯽搡묗煳汤ࡸ︰扰៰瓀沕큚ੀ�倌怇ꔺ엠犁婬ჯ࣠�촢揀怗킣婬૿꒣攡曏柟韯坟ソ羔辕yཾ쾙��ჿᇟዯᓿꄏꈿꍏꑟッ辦뽣콤뾩쾪꿷뿸刺廏ﮏﳯ髿忏鏿搟뽺ᾚ�⽩뾺㾠�ꋿ衯褟訯謿豏앟遟织䁏톳扣֠■쥐ࢀ挴愷㧠㌲祦搵瀌烊탈炵・辦龧�ᅫ࿐リꩿ鷏鳯 븯黿��맇迂뮃枰湉倇켆߿ࣟ৯ꇿꨯ_徤俦࿊Ή�꿬캿켯ꬿ곯껿꼏O侲殀٫䂎á悽⃓揠볿봟븯숿쀟셟侏bびƩ列惘ᇚ꿧뿨䲟�퀿̟Я嘳㋠曬딸א㥀ၢ慔戸暐Ⅲ捤攑ӵ斀者挶튨펏풟ᆵ뿕쿖�賯䊑䬍�鿰悿椦炁٫쯛ᣐ梁饮䀎ᰲᮂ뷰⁔먭樠ᩡ玤田兲맫័琠胸踻塚륰䋻º橤聳숛탌毠遶�ꐛᤇꀛU醕즹廬ޥǡ속毿ؤߟ૯ᐏటﯺ쫸鴀İ⍿Ⴇ쓠픐øg抻ꤚꕰ栐䌠ø釺₆滸祣ﳨ漜㽐횤㇚㇠幢A峗퀏Ↄ 僼⁏潂逆ᬡ♞扮á⌻盙됧⑰糨缧輨騩牄虵氡⨬⭯⥿垚跭栠ꇍ炩⺿⧏蔹ㆰ∹⎏⒟▯ҿ㑽끭㜮㠸ﴮㄵㄷ㈿⥏㦟㪿㛏�ꃍ镀Ḑ晰넞솰῭⸦ꇆ�‱ᆰ!⼡ጷꜚ忝℁爏髞젵㚁嶯火濬缏ཛ�䣯幏䴿ꔟ〃䆃忁俿傯妻䈳䞏勿䮿噯o轍齎轙翃迄雅䁿メ缾ἀ씁勵摒゚꿻濌矍㼍靮鼀꽕⼏돏㞃㠰换ⰴぢºဴ됴㖠鈸먳愀渲斱됳搶渵ꕰ慀戯挿o彤潥뿼嫘뗿ꗿῙ�檿�䑏��蹽癀ਫ਼彯엯얖뭚榰Ʊ肹ũⁱ䠭剏婉呎䱁莏剠셥獁䊐䅌䭃瞄腓∔䕍䥄䵕莏먣씓 ⶂ䕃や剅돿湇潏灟煯牿玏璟ᆵ兦Ὠ⽩ケ齛쿨꽿벀맿鋂錿鑏шտڏ゚輒鼓꼔徠켖ᾙ殍䛨놸©唠䕳?⽆㽇㽚彉徚Ɩ뽔궿�電恏멅@䂋ꃢᎺ䆜矣蕦斳�鋷鴀满삋샤չ◀℠浩硰늠࢝畡1�¥꿿냏륏셟ᅬ翮ῄ迅龤迀ﱬ⾵恿ꅅ廰诀谯贿蹏㍞맿瓡盿ﴏ뤀睾鴗黡혵送醏麕敠ꅦ輰ᾒ�ꨛ퍨ؠ幦ᱠ瓰獰⼺⽴⹀郒₳聑둯ꁥ㼰禯냑뉯䃀퓠帰彠ꃔォ뇑풀怿犧慞뫥럑ꑥ䀁拠〨㔬ⰳꇑ⥑漻ᇗꝦ暁飠慲鱰펰愠晫¢ꅸ䂻ꅸ뿩ʠ쏪Ꮺת ⷿꉳ昣新芃쬺荡Ḱ�䍰ꅧ탑䡻偙よ㱌义낅뿡쿢�屜湸絽愚瀞䂅烟晣就䂟㿀뤛朊暈蕆䖐佂챏彋뇑捲ꧡ鿴䃟풰뎐癐뉀珐쉀Ⴌ甶僔묯�斐魳샽ቀ脯雀甀ᆐ悿正㊶瀮돷톰鶷砐⎺皹㟘닻胠毐퇜չ澽侯䏷慳귆푁鉘ᤆ닿笯�ૅ쿿퀏턟O㿒俓忔濕翖迗鿘꿙�ൿ�瓧ﭿ뜀뤳ꈐ�⽀㼔捳뀒킁湟ዧᄰﮠ乆ᆵ뿧쿨�→΅ ⇯⏿쏯߹坔呉ↈῺﯯﰯ﴿﹏彟༁˿̟ЯԿُݟॿマ鼊鼝뼌佋�0 ༒ᐟᔯᘿᝏᡟ᩿マ鼛꼜�켞�揳戱偞⫭涐㿴┼⌯◿☏?⼧㼨伩弪漫缬輭鼮クㆿ惏拿挏㘕㜏ᜟ⼸߹聱葓䝀䅒䷾㼺伻弼漽缾⁹ꝲ䃿䄯䈿䍏䑟䕯䙿䞏゚꽈뽉콊콝澊ཏὐ凿刯匿呏啟噯坿墏゚꽙뽚콛�ハ�འ至秪僅籴斀匳낷穯㒁籰往솏ၰ鉮ㄽ潣罤轥齦柿梯榿櫏毟泯滿漏?⽰㽱゚ྡᾢ⦣�瘃刺备問啔빂祅稯笿籏絟彯㏾⾀㾁侂徃澄羅蛿螏袟覯鲿访쯟跏ྏᾐ⾑㾒侓徔澕羖響颏馟骯鮿쳏鵟黯狳胐邤뇾㍮獓�︐据뭀틒�戠�¢彣뾤쾥� ᄄྪ갟괯긿꽏끟녯⦅濢翣蓤羶辷龸ݸȲ䗼뫠뮯벿뷏뻟ﻯ샷솟슯쎿쓏엟ᅥ࿈Έ⿊㿋㿞忍ଇ�܂컨캰㞻爉牴৯ߍ�켟ば䇠 擼ቹጿᑏ�ע༖⤔냚ᡶᨯ�ﺓ켲ஒᴃẏᆟා�≁쾰퇺憠倵…緰튰킰�톂틏ﻔ胏ῖЃꘄ磚鿜᷿�쾿✝⢿⧏⫟훯O㿗�ﴬ輮鼯鼍輆Ȼჿ૧�쿓�́纰נּ쇚僐✰��䆅˳筓僐⇩✥�㩛ろ擱タ�ೀ㬰獠ꀟಿ⌿㽟ᓾ䓢�狣퇩狿닠�㨰䢑䤯┿䨕㿯輺뽇鼰᷏╸㡦扄�掐ⴵ끕づⴹ挴怢⁖㘲㘂⃙攵〸挱擸愳胏鼧輳鼴꼵㙟㞿���ㆆꃑ뼠⥠ὑ⽒㽓꘤ꇏꁣѯӠ�珀ą灢㈱ᇛ瀃惬�夐嶠䳐탕郛䁾奴�햃샛橤ꂳ屴䌀懲 奷歠胑彩摪饧\㗾酪进콌潣䟏腁큆ǿ枦桯歿橯殟沯宾⽡㑢慈�䳐宁Ɂၻﱥ箐栲聞㌦錄☮幀祐뢨❜䝡成�痧魹�ﲻﶯ柰ᇧ筷猐ΰ礐䇦䀭샻ཫ勵遙샚潯㽫眐灶爫斀昱㦘慢ꅖ㌸灖晀〲㤭地ⶀ〠搷搹㑥ㆸ㍢臑瀭܀ქბ臺䵅䥁䁌坟䉅噟냲佉Ѡ큀≐ﲰ敵꿧뿨쿩�↓鄏蒿藟蛯뿿ྈᾉ⾊㢋忷嬨策-侂䎣퀽胑惺큆닷�田₱悔郦弽߿ꐯয়膙ꤊ煋イ꾬뎭�㼏⤿衾Ű袳ꗻ∝灣ッ輟�侵⋿몿ᐟ묿뷿ᜏ굯븏꾷뾸鿃�쿅� ྾뿈짿쇏숿쭏쒿앯큿읟゚迒꿌쿊翕迖ᅪ࿏翘톃ꔪ㰐ⴡ嬭䁛 木倧爠‱9簩䤨⥅㹝છ�宐퀦큟嵦냞��푮�톏휿`濔翧罎❕攴࠳っ齥摐㠸靡ᆟ餸ⶰ唳灗ꔸ㠀唱埰⳧༮뽡�佰蔥섂䁟Ⱋ 渰隐愺オぞ⿲䏦醃翢럟䏿תּ璘奔ﮏ喔�䕃嘮ǰ㟈悚巿転幡ﱀﷱꉯ�㸏ソ輿驀鐥̧쀦큟ჶ四❰猃䀦킔昭⟠#慜퀋⑂轁饂씂摮㨟㌔⸳ဒ䄒聵⛽础Ժ剹㳼轅齆䥟伿ဎᆵ俸輄�遲輏輝都碈忷弟꼄뼅켆�ࢿ迯湁墁粐ઐ畲篹玐季嘰ీද呕戴㣀⁖嘶㒰嘹鎐困鿰팀끟み㌰謲謐 륭ႏ瑦鸹༹慜廟馰猰驠ℰ愑끭ꔑ䏁₲椡灭悛壿䖐ᕟᚏᦿ㷏゚㗵爊덼큂ႏ뀊遘૿陣垢壯嫿嬏尟㔯ᾏἧ⼨伡�㙤띢ჭ灭萳め邞鼵晠쁏㈭、ラ䂋ဒ佄彅潆罇轈巿帿䩁涘䦿䮞䰿䵏�⾃リྚល쁼豮Ꙣ鮢난됮呰劀㾐鹥丒鸲麀屐⵰ሲㄐ偹暁鍣鿰龀㛠黏ව诀㠐刦壠偠呥灹籅䋂瑁ⵃ曄猳ᾞ⾟访蹵轰咰蹰彠㈃軿迟郯鋿錏鐟锯阿o得澘⦅ཡὢ⽣㽤乥晿枏梕楏ꁟꄯ尿喀⦘ꡟ岿⣟ꑿꔯ_悛鱜콞ཷὸ⽹㽺佻糿晟朿罏耏樟歿沏゚꽭뽮콯�イུ ή盿贯躿迏郟釯糿钏뽟꽾뾖쾀�ノ禈ꝍ夠膧倠ၚ䀏ൽ珀侅ᾅ꾰㾇敎U넬쏦燤徰㾈侉巿⮒㾿嶯ힿ쀿셏⦅濚辵促뿥쿦⾿Ὴ쓿숿쵟츏씟욏킟゚翿#뿕쿖濘Έ폿쯿찿�칟텏゚꿒㿤俥꿙翛远ૣ瘰Ῠ꿝㿱쿟濺ῳ�㿵俶㼁濸ἃӿאָﲟگܟԯ奃ࣔ*�伍弎漏偝2럟Ա፡㝒ㆷʢ�㌍㔖