HomeMy WebLinkAboutSpeaker Forum Gregg ColburnHomelessness is
a Housing Problem
Jefferson County Intergovernmental Collaborative
Port Townsend, WA
Gregg Colburn | June 26, 2023
University of Washington
(The book)
2
According to the 2019 Point-in-Time homelessness census in
Seattle/King County, survey results suggest the following events
or conditions lead to homelessness:
3
Causes of Homelessness
0%5%10%15%20%25%30%
Job loss
Alcohol or drug use
Eviction
Divorce/separation
Inability to pay rent
Argument with family/friend
Are these conventional explanations of
homelessness root causes or precipitating events?
4
Causes of Homelessness
Ten friends decide to play a game of musical chairs and arrange ten
chairs in a circle. A leader begins the game by turning on the music,
and everyone begins to walk in a circle inside the chairs. The leader
removes one chair, stops the music, and the ten friends scramble to
find a spot to sit—leaving one person without a chair. The loser,
Mike, was on crutches after spraining his ankle. Given his condition,
he was unable to move quickly enough to find a chair during the
scramble that ensued.
Causes of Homelessness
What caused Mike’s chairlessness?
•Research demonstrates that drug use,
mental illness, and poverty increase the
risk of homelessness at the individual
level.
•But why do these conditions produce
homelessness in some geographic
contexts (Boston) and not others?
6
Causes of Homelessness
•Why do rates of homelessness vary so
widely throughout the United States?
Why, for example, does Seattle have
between four and five times the per
capita homelessness of Chicago?
•Does Los Angeles have a large
homelessness problem because it has
more people with these individual
vulnerabilities?
7
Introduction
•This is a book about cities, not about people.
•Understanding who becomes homeless is an important
question, but it doesn’t help us understand regional
variation (i.e. large racial disparities).
•Our thesis: Tight housing markets accentuate
vulnerabilities.
•Individual vulnerabilities serve as a sorting mechanism in
tight housing markets.
Introduction
Rates of Homelessness
10
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Homelessness per 1,000 people
Cities New York, New York
Washington, District of Columbia
San Francisco, California
Boston, Massachusetts
Atlanta, Georgia
Baltimore, Maryland
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
St. Louis, Missouri
Detroit, Michigan
Chicago, Illinois
Indianapolis, Indiana
Counties Los Angeles County, California
Santa Clara County, California
King County, Washington
Multnomah County, Oregon
Sacramento County, California
Hennepin County, Minnesota
Clark County, Nevada
San Diego County, California
Travis County, Texas
Dallas County, Texas
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina
Maricopa County, Arizona
Franklin County, Ohio
Bexar County, Texas
Hamilton County, Ohio
Cuyahoga County, Ohio
Miami-Dade County, Florida
Cook County, Illinois
Hillsborough County, Florida
Per capita rates of homelessness in select U.S. regions, 2019
Dashed lines indicate city and county averages of per capita PIT counts
Potential explanations:
The individual
12
Potential explanations: The individual
Poverty rate
Cities Counties
5%10%15%20%25%30%35%40%5%10%15%20%25%30%35%40%Rate of homelessness per 1,000 people0
2
4
6
8
10
12
Percent with income below poverty level versus PIT count (per
capita)
Dashed lines indicate a linear regression of per capita PIT counts onto poverty rate
between 2007 and 2019 for a sample of U.S. regions.
Bands indicate 95% confidence intervals for the slope of the regression line.
R² = 0.14
R² = 0.17
13
Potential explanations: The individual
Rate of serious mental illness
3%4%5%6%Rate of homelessness per 1,000 people0
1
2
3
4
5
Rate of serious mental illness versus PIT count (per capita)
Dashed lines indicate a linear regression of per capita PIT counts onto rates of serious
mental illness in U.S. states between 2007 and 2019.
Bands indicate 95% confidence intervals for the slope of the regression line.
R² = 0.05
14
Potential explanations: The individual
Rate of substance use disorder
6%7%8%9%10%11%12%Rate of homelessness per 1,000 people0
1
2
3
4
5
Rate of substance use disorder versus PIT count (per capita)
Dashed lines indicate a linear regression of per capita PIT counts onto rates of substance
use disorder in U.S. states between 2007 and 2019.
Bands indicate 95% confidence intervals for the slope of the regression line.
R² = 0.06
15
Potential explanations: The individual
Potential explanations:
Local context
17
Potential explanations: Local context
18
Potential explanations: Local context
19
Potential explanations: Local context
•Observers frequently blame left-leaning local
politicians for conditions that encourage or
tolerate homelessness. Our sample cities
were governed by Democrats 85% of the
time (Republicans 8%, Independents 7%).
•If Democrats are to blame, why don’t
Chicago and Cleveland (Democratic
strongholds) have a big problem with
homelessness?
20
Potential explanations: Local context
Potential explanations:
Housing market
22
Potential explanations: Housing market
23
Potential explanations: Housing market
Does homelessness thrive in certain cities because
more people are moving to those cities?
24
Potential explanations: Housing market
25
Potential explanations: Housing market
Typology
•Housing supply elasticity measures the change in
the supply of housing to a change in price. Supply
elasticity is driven by regulations and topography.
•Price elasticity of supply: % △ $% &’(%)$)* +’,,-$./
% △ $% ,0$1.
27
Typology
28
Typology
Conclusion
Regions need two types of investments:
1)Operating investments to fund housing support,
maintenance, and services, and
2)Capital investments to construct housing.
And where housing is difficult to construct, changes to
regulations and land use policy are needed
30
Conclusion
31
Three Tensions
Three tensions complicate this response:
•Short vs long-term
•Public versus private
•Local versus federal government
•Continuing to diagnose homelessness as a
problem of the individual will undermine efforts to
prevent and end it.
•The country requires a structural understanding
of and structural responses to homelessness.
•Bright spot: the dramatic fall in veteran
homelessness in the United States over the last
decade
32
Conclusion
Thank you!
https://homelessnesshousingproblem.com
colburn3@uw.edu
@ColburnGregg
Gregg Colburn
Runstad Department of Real Estate
University of Washington