HomeMy WebLinkAboutWorkshop re Piehl Property Big Quil Afternoon Session
615 Sheridan Street
n � Port Townsend, WA 98368
O` www.JeffersonCountyPublicHealth.org
Public H=
September 25,2023
JEFFERSON COUNTY
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
AGENDA REQUEST
TO: Board of County Commissioners
Mark McCauley, County Administrator
FROM: Pinky Mingo, Environmental Public Health and Water Quality
Director
Tami Pokorny, Natural Resources Program Coordinator
DATE: 10'Z f 0-ZL3
SUBJECT: Agenda Request: Authorization and Concurrence for the Piehl
Property on the Big Quilcene River Floodplain
STATEMENT OF ISSUE:
Public Health requests approval of an Authorization and Concurrence document for the Piehl property on
the Big Quilcene Floodplain.
ANALYSIS/STRATEGIC GOALS:
Approval of the Authorization and Concurrence document will allow Public Health, in partnership with
Public Works,to initiate negotiations to purchase the 1.04-acre Piehl property south of the Big Quilcene
River as part of the Lower Big Quilcene Floodplain Acquisitions project.The parcels,991201002 and
0004,are located near the southside shoreline, adjacent to County-owned property at the corner of Linger
Longer and Muncie in Quilcene. The Piehl property would be acquired fee-simple on a willing seller basis
for inclusion in the restoration project led by Hood Canal Salmon Enhancement Group.
FISCAL IMPACT/COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS:
Acquisition of the Piehl property is funded by RCO#18-1227. Match has been provided by an MOU with
the Hood Canal Salmon Enhancement Group as well as funds from the Big Quilcene Flood Account.
RECOMMENDATION:
Public Health management recommends approval of the Authorization and Concurrence document for the
Piehl property on the Big Quilcene Floodplain.
REVIEWED BY:
L3
Mark McCaul y ounty Administrator Date
Community Health Environmental Public Health
Developmental Disabilities Water Quality
360-385-9400 360-385-9444
360-385-9401 (f) Always working for a safer and healthier community (f) 360-379-4487
AUTHORIZATION TO PROCEED WITH
REAL PROPERTY ACQUISITION
Lower Big Quilcene Floodplain Acquisitions
Salmon Recovery Project
Piehl Property (RCO #18-1227)
Based on the review appraisal report of September 7,2023 and the authority granted below,we
hereby establish just compensation and authorize you to make the first offer on the following
property:
Parcel Numbers Just Compensation (Offer)
991201002
991201004 $45,000
Recom ation an Approval:
Mont P.E.,Public Wor s Director/County Engineer Date
Concurrence and Authorization:
The Board of County Commissioners of Jefferson County does hereby establish just compensation
as stated above.The Board does hereby indicate its concurrence and gives authorization for the
Department of Public Works in partnership with the Department of Environmental Public Health to
proceed with the offer,negotiation and acquisition of the above designated property in accordance
with Right of Way Acquisition Procedures Resolution 05-11,approved February 7,2011 and the
policies of the Recreation and Conservation Office and the Washington Department of Ecology.
Lower Big Quilcene Floodplain Acquisitions Project—Piehl
This authorization further directs the Departments to execute the documentation to close said
transactions and coordinate with the approved funding sources to pay for acquisition expenses.
Approved By:
JEFFERSON COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
Greg Brotherton,Chair
Kate Dean,Member
Heidi Eisenhour,Member
SEAL:
ATTEST:
Carolyn Gallaway Date
Clerk of the Board
Lower Big Quilcene Floodplain Acquisitions Project—Piehl
411 SH & H
VALUATION AND CONSULTING
APPRAISAL REVIEW
REVIEW OF THE APPRAISAL OF
PIEHL PROPERTY
QUILCENE, JEFFERSON COUNTY, WA
JEFFERSON COUNTY ASSESSOR'S PARCELS
991201002 AND 991201004
PREPARED BY
RICHARD F. DUNCAN, MAI
AND ANTHONY DUNCAN, REGISTERED TRAINEE
RF DUNCAN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
SH&H FILE 15931-23
S H H
VALUATION AND CONSULTING
September 7, 2023
Tami Pokorny
Natural Resources Program Coordinator
Environmental Public Health
Jefferson County Public Health
615 Sheridan Street
Port Townsend, WA 98368
Re: Review of the appraisal of Piehl Property
Located 180f Ft. W. of Linger Longer Rd. & Muncie Ave.
Quilcene, Jefferson County, WA
Jefferson County Assessor's Parcels 991201002& 991201004
Prepared by Richard F. Duncan,MAI, and Anthony Duncan, Registered Trainee
RF Duncan and Associates, Inc.
SH&H File 15931-23
Dear Ms. Pokorny:
I have reviewed the appraisal provided relevant to the above referenced property. The
report was prepared by Richard F. Duncan, MAI, Certified General Appraiser, and
Anthony Duncan, Registered Trainee,with RF Duncan and Associates, Inc. The appraisal
is relevant to a proposed total fee simple acquisition. The effective date of value is August
29, 2023.
The initial appraisal report provided had a report date of September 1, 2023. The initial
copy of the appraisal report contained a few items that required clarification and/or
corrections by the appraisers. Most items were minor and did not impact the analysis or
valuation, but some resulted in the need for some corrections for the sake of consistency
through the report(for example, in the valuation,the discussion of the adjustment process
in the text, which was well supported, did not necessarily match up with how the
adjustments were reflected in the adjustment chart). At the reviewer's request, the
appraisers provided a revised appraisal report, with a revision date of September 5, 2023
(the effective date of value of August 29, 2023, remains unchanged). The September 5,
2023,copy of the appraisal is the subject of this review.
3609 Market Place West,Suite 201 University Place,Washington 98466 1 p. 253.564.3230 f. 253.564.3143
The subject property is comprised of a site inclusive of approximately 1.04 acres situated
along the northerly side of Muncie Avenue in the community of Quilcene in Jefferson
County. The site is comprised of two assessor's parcels and is unimproved. There is an
older recreational vehicle on the site, but this is considered personal property and is not
included in the valuation. Based on the reviewer's discussion with the owner's
representative(Sandra Piehl,206-369-1542),the property has historically been utilized for
recreational purposes. The property is situated southerly of an undeveloped right of way
under the ownership of Jefferson County. The Big Quilcene River crosses through this
right of way. Thus, while the subject is not a riverfront site from a technical standpoint,
the proximity of the river and the undeveloped nature of the right of way provides the
subject site with riverfront attributes.
Jefferson County is proposing to acquire the subject property in support of their ongoing
restoration of the Big Quilcene River. Based on a"Legal Lot of Record Determination for
Development Eligibility,"as prepared by the Jefferson County Department of Community
Development(and replicated in the addenda of the appraisal),the subject property is not a
legal lot of record. Thus, while the property can be conveyed/sold,the site is not eligible
for development permit applications to Jefferson County and, thus, cannot be developed.
This determination,along with the physical attributes of the property, essentially limits the
site to recreational use.
The estimated market value indication relevant to the subject property in the report under
review, as of August 29, 2023, is$45,000.
This field review assignment included an inspection of the subject site. The reviewer
invited the property owner's representative,Sandra Piehl,to attend a joint inspection of the
property. The owner declined this invitation, but did provide some property background
and history to the reviewer. The property was physically inspected by the reviewer on
September 6, 2023. Five total comparable sales are analyzed in the appraisal. Three of
these comparables were previously viewed by the reviewer for earlier assignments. The
remaining two comparables were visited by the reviewer on September 6, 2023.
The appraisal report is reviewed generally in the order presented. If a section of the report
is deemed acceptable, little or no discussion is presented. When issues arise, or the
appraisal product requires additional clarification or comment, further discussion is
provided by the reviewer.
2
REVIEWER'S SUBJECT PHOTOGRAPHS
(TAKEN BY CHAD JOHNSON ON SEPTEMBER 6,2023)
3
WESTERLY VIEW OF MUNCIE AVENUE,
SUBJECT SITE TO RIGHT
.
oil 6
NORTHWESTERLY VIEW OF SITE FROM MUNCIE AVENUE
4
� 5t
r
NORTHEASTERLYOF WESTERLY AREA OF SITE
w r.
EASTERLY VIEW OF BIG QUILCENE RIVER FROM BRIDGE AT LINGER
r
S r '
LONGER1 ' D, SUBJECT TO RIGHT IN BACKGROUND
Client and Intended Users of this Review
The appraisal report (Page 13) indicates that the client relevant to this assignment is
Jefferson County. In addition to the client, intended users of the report include the
Washington State Recreation and Conservation Office (RCO). These are the same
intended users of this appraisal review.
Appraisal Review Criteria
The review is intended to comply with the following standards:
Uniform Standards for Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP, 2020-2021 Edition,
Extended through December 31,2023)
Appraisal Requirements of the Washington State Recreation and Conservation Office
Title Page
Appropriately presented.
Letter of Transmittal(Page I)
This section is appropriately presented. The letter of transmittal provides basic details
about the assignment and the subject property, as follows:
"The subject consists of two adjacent undeveloped parcels consisting of
approximately 1.04 acres. The agency proposes a total fee simple
acquisition of the subject parcel. "
There are no identified extraordinary assumptions or hypothetical conditions relevant to
the analysis indicated in the letter of transmittal of the appraisal report; however, on Page
3, it is identified that an extraordinary assumption has been invoked relevant to the
appraisers' lack of access to a Phase One environmental site assessment. Lacking this,the
appraisers indicate that they have "assumed that the subject is free of environmental
contamination..." Given that making assumptions about the lack of environmental
contamination is common practice when a formal environmental study is not available,the
reviewer suggests that this particular assumption does not necessarily rise to the level of
requiring it to be identified as an extraordinary assumption. Under either scenario(general
assumption versus extraordinary assumption),this is a reasonable assumption on which to
base the analysis and it does not impact the valuation process detailed in the appraisal.
The appraisers restate the value conclusion of$45,000 within the transmittal letter.
6
Table of Contents (Page II)
Appropriately presented.
Certification (Pages 1-2)
The certification is appropriately presented, including restating the effective appraisal date
and the market value estimate relevant to the subject property.
Appraisal Problem/Preliminary Discussion (Page 3)
The appraisers utilize this section to provide further details about the proposed acquisition,
the proposed acquisition and the subject property itself. The fact that the property has been
determined by the Jefferson County Department of Community Development (DCD) to
not constitute a legal lot of record is highlighted in this section. Due to the lack of legal
status as a lot of record, the property is ineligible for development permit applications,
although the property can be conveyed (sold). This plays a significant role in the analysis
of the property and it is appropriate to reveal this information early in the appraisal report.
Larger Parcel Analysis (Page 3)
While the inclusion of a Larger Parcel analysis is not required by USPAP, it is still an
appropriate discussion to present within this type of appraisal report. The three tests of the
Larger Parcel analysis are discussed, including unity of ownership,contiguity and unity of
use. The subject property is comprised of assessor's two parcels. Both are smaller than
the minimum lot size based on the current zoning and, based on the findings of Jefferson
County DCD, neither are legally developable. Based on these characteristics,and the fact
that the two assessor's parcels have a singular highest and best use (recreational use), the
appraisers conclude that the two parcels(991201002 and 991201004)are representative of
the Larger Parcel for valuation purposes. The reviewer concurs with this conclusion.
Summary of Salient Facts and Conclusions (Page 4)
Appropriately presented, including identifying and summarizing the property, parcel
numbers, ownership, land size and zoning. The subject site is indicated as being
undeveloped and containing 1.04 acres. The appraisers also restate the estimated market
value conclusion, as of August 29, 2023, of$45,000.
Plat Map (Page 5), Aerial Photo (Page 6)and Subject Photos (Pages 7-9)
Appropriately presented. The appraisers provide a parcel map and an aerial view of the
subject, accompanied by photographs of the property taken on August 29, 2023. This
section is adequately presented.
Assumptions and Limiting Conditions (Pages 10-11)
Adequately presented and reasonable.
Acquisition Appraisal Salient Information (Pages 12-13)
Within this section, the appraisers identify the appraisal standards followed (USPAP and
RCO), the intended use/users of the report, the property rights appraised (fee simple) and
the purpose of the appraisal. They additionally provide the definition of Market Value
applied within the appraisal analysis. A 10-year sales history is provided, along with a
summary of the scope of appraisal, which summarizes the process completed to estimate
the value of the property. Overall, this section is adequately presented.
Area/Neighborhood Description (Pages 14-17)
Adequately presented and provides the reviewer with a basic understanding of
neighborhood characteristics, including utility availability,transportation linkages,general
environmental issues impacting properties in the area,and recent development trends. The
site is located in the community of Quilcene in Jefferson County. This section concludes
by indicating that the subject neighborhood is primarily rural in nature with low density
single family development being the most evident use.
Site Description (Pages 18-20)
The subject property is a rectangular-shaped site comprised of two assessor's parcels. The
property includes primary access from Muncie Avenue,along the southerly side of the site.
An undeveloped right of way is situated northerly of the property, with this area crossed
by the Big Quilcene River. While the subject is not a"true"riverfront site,the fact that the
adjacent right of way is undeveloped allows for pedestrian access from the subject site to
the river. The entirety of the site is within a regulated flood plain or an identified floodway.
Given the proximity of the Big Quilcene River, the subject falls under the requirements of
the Shoreline Master Program, with the area of the river near the subject identified as a
Conservancy environment. Available utilities include electricity and telephone service,
although a recent decision by the Jefferson County Department of Community
8
Development indicates that the site does not constitute a"legal lot" and is not eligible for
development permit applications (including the installation of a well or septic system).
Overall, the Site Description section provides the reviewer with a good understanding of
the physical characteristics of the property.
Zoning and Taxes (Page 21)
Zoning/development criteria and the current real estate tax characteristics of the subject are
summarized in these two sections. The subject is zoned Rural Residential (RR-5), with a
maximum density of one homesite per five acres. Thus, as existing, the two assessor's
parcels comprising the subject represent non-conforming sites. Further, as detailed
previously in the appraisal, the findings of the Jefferson County DCD indicate that the
property does not represent a legal lot and is not eligible for permit applications.
With respect to the current assessment and taxes, the total combined assessed value is
$4,800, significantly lower than the appraised value. The reviewer notes that, relevant to
the comparable sales utilized in the subsequent analysis, most exhibit assessed values that
are well below their respective recent sale prices, suggesting that the subject is not unique
in this respect. Overall,this section is adequately presented.
Highest and Best Use(Pages 23-25)
The appraisers go through the four components of the highest and best use analysis as
though vacant(legally permissible,physically possible,financially feasible and maximally
productive) and ultimately conclude that, due to the property's characteristics,the use that
would provide the greatest value would be for recreational use. This conclusion is
appropriate given the characteristics of the subject property.
Valuation—Sales Comparison Approach (Pages 26-30)
At the onset of this section of the report, the appraisers briefly introduce the three basic
techniques for valuing real estate (Cost Approach, Income Approach and Sales
Comparison Approach). As the property is undeveloped, the appraisers utilize the Sales
Comparison Approach to value the property. The reviewer concurs that this is the most
applicable approach for valuing the subject given its overall characteristics.
The appraisers describe the search for relevant sales to compare to the subject property for
analysis purposes. The search included property sales dating back to January 1, 2020.
Based on the reviewer's examination of the five comparables ultimately utilized in the
9
appraisal,all have a similar highest and best use,that of recreational use. The comparables
selected are analyzed utilizing an overall price per site as the unit of comparison,which is
appropriate for the subject property given that it can feasibly only support recreational use
on a small scale. Likewise,the comparables are all relatively small,bracketing the subject
in size (ranging from 0.22 acres to 1.90 acres). A map and detailed property/sale
descriptions are provided within the Addenda section of the report. A comparable sales
summary chart is provided on Page 27,describing the five comparables,comprised of four
closed sales and one current listing(Sale 2). A narrative summary of each sale, including
descriptions of superior and inferior aspects as compared to the subject property, is
provided on Page 28.
The adjustment process is illustrated in a grid provided on Page 29. The various elements
of comparison that impact value, such as date of sale, location, size,topography, available
utilities, and the presence or absence of waterfrontage, are considered within the
adjustment chart. The upper end of the range(Sale 2 at$85,000) is comprised of a current
listing, which is appropriately adjusted downward for its listing status, as well as superior
river frontage (being directly on the Duckabush River). The lower end of the range (Sale
5 at $37,000) is a recent sale with no access to nearby waterfront amenities, suggesting a
higher unit value for the subject. After offsetting factors, the appraisers conclude that a
value estimate between the indications of Sale 4 ($50,000) and Sale 5 ($37,000) is
appropriate. Ultimately, the appraisers conclude to a value estimate for the subject of
$45,000. Based on the data presented and analyzed, the reviewer concludes that this is a
reasonable value estimate for the subject property.
Report of Contact With Owner(Page 31)
Adequately presented.
Addenda (Page 32-58)
Within the addenda of the report, the appraisers provide a summary of their respective
qualifications, maps and detailed data sheets for the comparable sales considered in the
analysis,a copy of the Jefferson County Department of Community Development's"Legal
Lot of Record Determination for Development Eligibility" document, and the title report
relevant to the property. The addenda section is adequately presented.
10
Reviewer's Conclusions
The appraisal report under review appears to be well researched and presented. The data
and analyses provided in the appraisal report led to a reasonable value conclusion for the
subject property. The reviewer concludes that the appraisers' reconciled value conclusion
is supported and reasonable. This conclusion, as of August 29, 2023, is $45,000.
Respectfully submitted,
Chad C. Johnsoe, MAI
State of Washington Certification 1101662
tt
I,the review appraiser,certify to the best of my knowledge and believe,that:
1. The statements of fact contained in this report are true and correct.
2. The reported analyses, opinions, and conclusions in this review report are limited only by the
assumptions and limiting conditions stated and are my personal, impartial, and unbiased
professional analyses,opinions,and conclusions.
3. I have no present or prospective interest in the property that is the subject of the work under review
and no personal interest with respect to the parties involved.
4. I have performed no services,as an appraiser or in any other capacity,regarding the property that
is the subject of the work under review within the three-year period immediately preceding
acceptance of this assignment.
5. 1 have no bias with respect to the property that is the subject of the work under review or to the
parties involved with the assignment.
6. My engagement in this assignment was not contingent upon developing or reporting predetermined
results.
7. My compensation is not contingent on an action or event resulting from the analyses,opinions,or
conclusions in this review or from its use.
8. My compensation for completing this assignment is not contingent upon the development or
reporting of predetermined assignment results or assignment results that favors the cause of the
client,the attainment of a stipulated result,or the occurrence of a subsequent event directly related
to the intended use of this appraisal review.
9. My analyses, opinions, and conclusions were developed and this review report was prepared in
conformity with the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice.
10. I have made a personal inspection of the subject of the work under review.
11. No one provided significant appraisal or appraisal review assistance to the person signing this
certification.
12. The reported analyses, opinions, and conclusions were developed, and this report has been
prepared,in conformity with the requirements of the Code of Professional Ethics and Standards of
Professional Practice of the Appraisal Institute.
13. As of the date of this report, I have completed the continuing education program for Designated
Members of the Appraisal Institute.
Washington State-Certified General Real Signature r�
Estate Appraiser Certificate: 1101662 Chad C.Johnson,MKI
September 7,2023
12
APPRAISAL REVIEW
ASSUMPTIONS AND LIMITING CONDITIONS
1. The property descriptions supplied to the reviewer are assumed to be correct;
2. No surveys of the properties have been made by the reviewer and no responsibility is assumed in
connection with such matters. Maps in the appraisals are included only to assist the reader in
visualizing the properties. Property dimensions and sizes should be considered approximate;
3. No responsibility is assumed for matters of a legal nature affecting title to the properties,nor is any
opinion of title rendered. Property titles are assumed to be good and merchantable;
4. Information furnished by others is assumed to be true,correct,and reliable. A reasonable effort has
been made to verify such information;however,no responsibility for its accuracy is assumed by the
reviewer;
5. All mortgages,liens,encumbrances,leases,and servitudes have been disregarded unless so specified
in review. The properties are assumed to be under responsible ownership and competent management;
6. It is assumed that there are no hidden or unapparent conditions of the properties,their subsoil,or their
structures which would render them more or less valuable. No responsibility is assumed for such
conditions or for engineering which may be required to discover them;
7. Unless otherwise stated,the existence of hazardous material,which may or may not be present on the
properties,was not observed by the reviewer. The reviewer has no knowledge of the existence of such
materials on or in the properties. The reviewer, however, is not qualified to detect such substances.
The presence of substances such as asbestos,urea-formaldehyde foam insulation,or other potentially
hazardous materials may affect the value of the properties. The value estimates in this review are
predicated on the assumption that there is no such material on or in the properties that would cause a
loss in value. No responsibility is assumed for any such conditions,or for the expertise or engineering
knowledge required to discover them. The client is urged to retain an expert in this field if desired;
8. Unless otherwise stated,no environmental impact studies were either requested or made in conjunction
with this review,and the reviewer hereby reserves the right to alter,amend,revise,or rescind any of
the value opinions based upon any subsequent environmental impact studies, research, or
investigation;
9. It is assumed that there is full compliance with all applicable federal, state, and local environmental
regulations and laws unless noncompliance is specified,defined,and considered in this review;
10. It is assumed that all applicable zoning and use regulations and restrictions have been complied with,
unless nonconformity has been specified,defined,and considered in this review;
11. It is assumed that all required licenses,consents,or other legislative or administrative authority from
any local,state,or national governmental or private entity or organization have been or can be obtained
or renewed for any use on which the value estimates contained in this review are based;
12. The reviewer will not be required to give testimony or appear in court because of having made this
review unless arrangements have been previously made therefor;
13. Possession of this review or a copy thereof,does not carry with it the right of publication. It may not
be used for any purpose by any person other than the client without the written consent of the reviewer
and in any event,only with properly written qualification and only in its entirety;
13
14. Neither all nor any part of the contents of this review,or copy thereof,shall be conveyed to the public
through advertising, public relations, news, sales, or any other media without written consent and
approval of the reviewer. Nor shall the reviewer,client, firm,or professional organization of which
the reviewer is a member be identified without the written consent of the reviewer;
15. The liability of the reviewer,employees,and subcontractors is limited to the client only. There is no
accountability,obligation,or liability to any third party. If this review is placed in the hands of anyone
other than the client,the client shall make such party aware of all limiting conditions and assumptions
of the assignment and related discussions. The reviewer is in no way responsible for any cost incurred
to discover or correct any deficiencies in the properties;
16. It is assumed that the public project which is the object of this review will be constructed in the manner
proposed and in the foreseeable future;
17. Acceptance and/or use of this review constitutes acceptance of the foregoing assumptions and limiting
conditions.
14
SALIENT INFORMATION
Property Rights
The property rights appraised constitute the fee simple interest.
Date of Value
The effective date of the value opinion for the property in this review is the effective date
of the appraisal under review.
Competency of Reviewer
The reviewer has both the knowledge and experience required to competently perform this
review.
Purpose of this Review
Review the report to determine if value estimate has been accurately established,and if the
report is USPAP compliant and adheres to the appraisal guidelines of the Washington State
Recreation and Conservation Office.
Scope of this Review
Those commonly recognized methods and techniques most appropriate for arriving at a
market value indication relevant to the subject property were utilized in this review.
15
QUALIFICATIONS
CHAD C.JOHNSON,MAI
GENERAL EDUCATION
BA,Business Administration,Major in Real Estate, Washington State University
Relevant Coursework
Real Estate Principles
Real Estate Finance
Real Estate Valuation
Real Estate Investment
Real Estate Law
CERTIFICATIONS
Washington State Certified General Real Estate Appraiser
Certification 1101662
Initial Issue Date: March 31,2005
PROFESSIONAL DESIGNATION
MAI,Appraisal Institute
PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE
Real Estate Appraiser and Consultant
SH&H Valuation and Consulting(formerly Strickland,Heischman&Hoss, Inc.)
June 2001 to Present
APPRAISAL INSTITUTE COURSES& EXAMINATIONS COMPLETED
Course 310,Basic Income Capitalization(February 2002)
Course 320,General Applications(December 2004,online course)
Course 410, Standards of Professional Practice,Part A(September 2001)
Course 420, Standards of Professional Practice,Part B(September 2001)
Course 510,Advanced Income Capitalization(December 2002)
Course 520,Highest&Best Use and Market Analysis(September 2006)
Course 530,Advanced Sales Comparison and Cost Approaches(September 2008)
Course 540,Report Writing and Valuation Analysis(August 2003)
Course 550,Advanced Applications(January 2009)
Uniform Appraisal Standards for Federal Land Acquisitions—Practical Applications(May 2017)
Eminent Domain and Condemnation(August 2018)
Various Continuing Education Courses
16
APPRAISAL EXPERIENCE INCLUDES
Apartments Institutional Properties
Agricultural Properties Leasehold Interests
Aquaculture Properties Manufacturing Facilities
Automobile Dealerships Medical Offices
Automobile Repair Facilities Mineral Extraction Operations
Banks Mixed-Use Properties
Bowling Alleys Mobile Home Parks
Business Parks Natatoriums
Cardlock Fueling Facilities Nurseries
Carwashes Private Schools
Churches Professional Offices
Commercial Land Recreational Properties
Commercial Subdivisions Religious Retreats
Condominium Developments Residential Land
Conservation Easements Residential Subdivisions
Daycare Centers Resource and Forest Land Properties
Food Processing Plants Restaurants
Gas Station/Convenience Stores Retail Properties
Golf Courses Right-of-Way Acquisitions
Health Clubs Self-Storage Facilities
Hotels/Motels Shellfish Processing Plants
Industrial Properties Single-Family Residences
Industrial Subdivisions Waterfront Properties
APPRAISAL EXPERIENCE IN THE FOLLOWING WASHINGTON COUNTIES
Benton County Lewis County
Clallam County Mason County
Clark County Okanogan County
Cowlitz County Pacific County
Franklin County Pierce County
Grant County San Juan County
Grays Harbor County Skagit County
Island County Snohomish County
Jefferson County Spokane County
King County Thurston County
Kitsap County Whatcom County
Kittitas County Yakima County
17
COMPLETED APPRAISAL ASSIGNMENTS FOR
Alaska USA Federal Credit Union Olympic Bank
AmericanWest Bank One Pacific Coast Bank
Anchor Savings Bank Pacific International Bank
Bank of America Pacific Northwest Bank
Bank of the Pacific Peoples Bank
Bank of the West Pierce Commercial Bank
Banner Bank Quinault Maritime Resort
Business Loan Center,Inc. Quinault Nation Enterprise Board
Capital Land Trust Rainier Pacific Bank
Center for Natural Lands Management Seacoast Commerce Bank
Christian Community Credit Union Seattle Savings Bank
CIT Small Business Lending Security State Bank
City of Enumclaw Sequim School District
City of Kent Skagit State Bank
City of Tacoma Public Works Sound Community Bank
Coastal Community Bank South Sound Bank
Colliers International Sportsmen's National Land Trust
Colonial Bank,NA Sterling Savings Bank
Columbia Bank Sunwest Bank
Commencement Bank Suquamish Tribe
Energy Northwest Thurston First Bank
FDIC Timberland Bank
First Community Bank Trust for Public Land
First Federal Tukwila School District
First Horizon Corporation U.S.Bancorp
First Interstate Bank U.S.Department of Interior
Grays Harbor County Umpqua Bank
Great Peninsula Conservancy UniBank
Heritage Bank Union Bank
Hood Canal Salmon Enhancement Group Valley Bank
Jefferson Land Trust Viking Bank
KeyBank National Association WA State Department of Fish& Wildlife
Kitsap Bank WA State Department of Natural Resources
Kitsap Transit WA State Department of Transportation
Marquette Business Credit,Inc. Washington First International Bank
Mid Puget Sound Fisheries Enhancement Wells Fargo Bank
Native American Bank,NA Whidbey Camano Land Trust
Nature Conservancy of Washington Yakima County Public Services
Nisqually Land Trust Zions First National Bank
Northwest Farm Credit Services Various Attorneys and Private Individuals
18
ADDENDA
615 Sheridan Street Public Health Purchase Order
L�i
Port Townsend, WA 98368 Fiscal Year 2023 Page 1 of 1
• •PACKAGES,AND SHIPPING PAPERS.
Purchase Order Number 22300310
Bill To Ship To
615 SHERIDAN STREET 615 SHERIDAN STREET Purchase Order Date 07/28/2023
PORT TOWNSEND, WA 98368 PORT TOWNSEND, WA 98368 Department WATERQUALITY-JCPH
Vendor 7086
SH&H VALUATION,LLC
DBA:SH&H VALUATUION AND CONSULTING
3609 MARKET PLACE WEST
SUITE 201
UNIVERSITY PLACE,WA 98466
VENDOR PHONE NUMBER VENDOR EMAIL VENDOR NUMBER REQUISITION NUMBER BUYER NAME DELIVERY REFERENCE
7086 12300340 Apple Martine
REVIEW APPRAISAL FOR PIEHL PROPERTY BIG QUIL-PIEHL
DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UOMEXTENDED
1 REVIEW APPRAISAL FOR PIEHL PROPERTY BIG QUILCENE-NOT TO EXCEED 1.0000 EACH $2,800.0000 $2,8W.00
$2800.00
GL#:12855310-410322 $2,800.00
Project#:E-12800378 .PROF SRV .LOWBIGQUIL.
This instrument has been audited in the manner required by local government regulations and laws. Your jurisdiction's
specific legal text may be placed in this area.
Ver difca Shaw-Public Health Deputy Purchase Order Total $2,800.00
Director
Purchasing Copy
(� .Y.4T,t•v f.l
STATE OF WASHINGTON JJ pgMngp�SI41pV1IMtYip1
DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING -BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONS DIVISION Li•� LICENSING
THIS CERTIFIES THAT THE PERSON OR BUSINESS NAMED BELOW IS AUTHORIZED AS A
!. CERTIFIED GIIKERAL REAL ESTATE APPRAISER +
SUPERVISOR
CHAD CARTER JOHNSONj,
137121177H AVE E {,
+I PUYALLUP WA 983744730
,I +
t T+:I 1101662 03/31/2005 12/15/2024
' _License Number Issue Date Expiration Date_ Tcrasu Iir'rnlzl n,IlirVL!
+
SHF3H
VALUATION AND CONSULTING
3609 Market Place W Suite 201, University Place, WA 98466
p. 253.564.3230 I f. 253.564.3143
8 This sketch is provided,without a charge,for your
sa z a information. It is not intended to show all matters
related to the property including,but not limited to,
s .5-1 8a a m$ area,dimensions,easements,encroachments or
a�8 m$ location of boundaries. It is not a part of,nor does it
s s 3 s modify,the commitment or policy to which is
attached. The Company assumes NO LIABILITY for any
3 �$ v matter related to this sketch. Referenced should be
•` = i -m made to an accurate survey for further information.
. li 7
' - —
a0m , r
amp -- a' :---
Yf_•___ -_
\� N�riaon Aw. v
v
(t L/
_aoo o° �� : __ __ m..,. �,# a y
B.� II r
�0u P.A.o>oM. LSu pp lamantar
o g • Y - _ _ lat oVow a a -- --
o.rwa.rwawn■