HomeMy WebLinkAboutHealthier Together JEFFERSON COUNTY
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
REGULAR AGENDA REQUEST
TO: Jefferson County Board of Commissioners
FROM: Mark McCauley, County Administrator
DATE: November 20, 2023
SUBJECT: Healthier Together- Aquatic Center Briefing
STATEMENT OF ISSUE:
Jefferson County has partnered in,and helped fund,an effort to assess the feasibility of building a modern
health/aquatic facility.The City of Port Townsend,Port of Port Townsend,Jefferson Healthcare,YMCA
and Jefferson Aquatic Coalition engaged Opsis Architecture, a firm that specializes in community and
aquatic facilities, to assess potential sites, costs and financing models. Opsis has submitted their final
report. Carrie Hite, Healthier Together Project Manager, will brief the Commissioners on the latest
developments and next steps.
ANALYSIS:
Items to be discussed during the briefing:
• Revisions to the design schematic
• Public Facilities District
• City of Port Townsend support for the project
• Facility operations
• Election costs
• Independent financial review
FISCAL IMPACT:
Although the presentation itself has no financial impact it may lead to decisions with substantial
financial impacts.
RECOMMENDATION:
Listen to the presentation and ask questions.
REVIEWED BY:
Mark Mc a ey, County Administrat Dat
Mcity of port<�,
Townsend
JEFFERSON COUNTY
HEALTHIER TOGETHER
November 20 , 2023
Orientation Revisions : Strategies to reduce cost, address
design concerns, and work harmoniously with the site.
Revised cost estimate $28M construction costs.
Campus
Entrance
Window
Public Showers: additional $100,000 to construct, $50,000/yr to operate.
Operational option.
Parking Lot
Original Plan
------------
- ,Li Lot1 Food
1 Bank
I I
1 New
ISplash J t. r._._._.� Image
1 Pad t
IFuture ; ( PT Parks
I ;1 Addition &Pec
Public 1
Pickleball Play Plaza I Police
I It-
1
I
4
k
.IY
Revised Site Plan
l
l i Food
I Bank
l 1
I r... •. , I Clothing
Ent ; Exchange
urt -A I 1
1 -. Splash Pla 1 PT Parks
1 Pad S. t 1 &Pec
Park
1 Pickleball �.V.J l Olice
1 1
: ..�
Revised Orientation Option A
I ♦ Food
I _ _ Bank
I _ _ Clothing
Exchange
PT Parks
&Pec
L----- _- _...S. ru.
..o
t
Police
1
L-----------------40,
r
Financial Analysis
Steering Committee Recommendation:
Public Facilities District,5.5%, 30 year bond, 2/10ths of 1% sales tax,
Countywide. Proformas in your packet.
Projected cost per person, per year: $10-30
Public Facilities District - PFD Funded by Sales Tax
$20M Bond, 30 YR, 5.5%
Taxable Retail Sales basis on 2021
Year 1 2 3 4 5
Level debt service ($) 1,376,108.00 1,376,108.00 1,376,108.00 1,376,108.00 1,376,108.00
County Wide PFD Sales Tax 1,393,251.23 1,421,116.26 1,448,981.28 1,476,846.31 1,504,711.33
Annual Surplus/Deficit 17,143.23 45,008.26 72,873.28 100,738.31 128,603.33
Operations —R Elacement ------------- 17,143.23 62,151.49 135,024.78 235,763.08 364,366.42
6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
1,376,108.00 1,376,108.00 1,376,108.00 1,376,108.00 1,376,108.00 1,376,108.00 1,376,108.00 1,376,108.00 1,376,108.00 1,376,108.00
1,532,576.36 1,560,441.38 1,588,306.41 1,616,171.43 1,644,036.46 1,671,901.48 1,699,766.51 1,727,631.53 1,755,496.55 1,783,361.58
156,468.36 184,333.38 212,198.41 240,063.43 267,928.46 295,793.48 323,658.51 351,523.53 379,388.55 407,253.58
520,834.77 705,168.16 917,366.56 1,157,429.99 1,425,358.45 1,721,151.93 2,044,810.44 2,396,333.97 2,775,722.52 3,182,976.10
16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
1,376,108.00 1,376,108.00 1,376,108.00 1,376,108.00 1,376,108.00 1,376,108.00 1,376,108.00 1,376,108.00 1,376,108.00 1,376,108.00 1,376,108.00
1,811,226.60 1,839,091.63 1,866,956.65 1,894,821.68 1,922,686.70 2,034,146.80 2,062,011.83 2,089,876.85 2,117,741.88 2,145,606.90 2,285,776.33
435,118.60 462,983.63 490,948.65 518,713.68 546,578.70 658,038.80 685,903.83 713,768.85 741,633.88 769,498.90 909,668.33
3,618,094.71 4,081,078.33 4,571,926.99 5,090,640.67 5,637,219.37 6,295,258.17 6,981,162.00 7,694,930.85 8,436,564.72 9,206,063.62 10,115,731.95
27 28 29 30
1,376,108.00 1,376,108.00 1,376,108.00 1,376,108.00 $41,283,240
2,331,491.85 2,378,121.69 2,425,684.12 2,474,197.81
955,383.85 1,002,013.69 1,049,576.12 1,098,089.81
11,071,115.80 12,073,129.49 13,122,705.62 14,220,795.42
Public Facilities District
County Wide: service delivery area
Independent Financial Review
Adopted by resolution to form a PFD by the Board of Commissioners.
Governing Board appointed by Board of Commissioners;
Voted to put it on the ballot by the newly seated PFD.
Independent Financial Review
Any county may create a public facilities district under chapter 36.100
RCW to develop and operate sports, entertainment, convention, or
recreational facilities, as well as "regional centers" as defined above.
Public facilities districts are municipal corporations with independent taxing
authority and are taxing districts under the state constitution. PFDs must be
coextensive with the boundaries of the jurisdictions that created them.
y.
Operational Cost Summary
Base Plan
29,700 sf
Expense* $1.27M
Revenue $0.84M
Subsidy $0.43M
Current Subsidy $0.40M
Cost Recovery 66%
1
1
* Assumes YMCA as operator
Operational ProJjections
Operations:
$30,000 per year, still considers city's $400,000 subsidy for current pool.
Developed with market analysis, size and amenities included, and
financial performance of existing pool.
Projections vetted and analyzed by the Y.
Need to add additional $50,000 per year if supporting stand alone
public showers.
Requested
Board of Commissioners vote to support the steering committee
recommendation:
SITE: Mountain View Commons
PROGRAM : Base Plan (Full Build-Out if fundraising allows)
FUNDING: • $17M Fundraising • PFD with 0.2% Sales Tax and 2%( 20 M)
TIMING: PFD Measure in April 2024
City Council approved public showers
City/County share in special election cost.
Next Steps
Independent Financial Review
BOCC adopts resolution to form PFD
BOCC appoints people to the PFD
PFD adopts ballot language for sales tax by
February 20, 2024 for April special election .
' TCilyaport,
ownsend
Questions / Discussion