Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2023 04 25 CFFCOC Special Meeting Final Summary  * Decisions and action items are indicated in bold font. Members Present: Mary Biskup, District 1; Guy Dobyns, District 3; Rob Harbour, Vice Chair, Interest – Working Lands; Richard Jahnke, Interest – Coastal Areas; Cameron Jones, Chair, Interest – Equity; Kalyn Marab, District 3; E. Ryan McMackin, Interest – Wetlands; Joanne Pontrello, District 2; Jessica Randall, Interest – Ecosystem Services; Ron Rempel, Interest – Wildlife Conservation Biology; Craig Schrader, Interest – Climate Change; Dave Wilkinson, District 1 Members Absent: None County Staff Present: Michael Dawson, (Department of Health), Tami Pokorny, Natural Resources Program Coordinator Others Present: Rebekah Brooks, Recorder (Rebekah Brooks Contracting) I. Call to Order Chair Cameron Jones called the meeting to order at 3:05 PM. II. Welcome and Introductions III. Approval of Minutes Rob Harbour moved to approve the CFCOC minutes for the 4/4/23 Presentation Meeting as written; Richard Jahnke seconded. The motion passed with all in favor. IV. Guest Observer Comments None V. Old Business Annual Reports for 2022 Tami Pokorny reminded the group that the Annual Reports were received prior to the 4/4/23 CFCOC meeting, but that there had not been enough time to get into them. The group discussed the reports and whether a motion was needed to approve them. Mary Biskup asked about the two lots that were not purchased as part of the Dosewallips Lazy C project; Tami explained that the landowner withdrew willingness to sell those parcels. The CFCOC may choose to retain those designated funds with the Committee, or to keep the funds available to the project in case they could be used for a different parcel. After three years, the sponsor may become ineligible and may need to request an extension. In the last eight months, the Dosewallips has shifted away from the Lazy C, but it will always be a place where the River will return so landowner willingness may change again in time. The group agreed to leave the funds with the project in case they could be used. Richard Jahnke noted that with that exception, the other projects appeared to be proceeding as planned. Mary Biskup moved to accept the Annual Reports; Rob Harbour seconded. The motion passed with all in favor. VI. Sub-committee Reports None VI. New Business Appearance of Fairness Forms *Guy Dobyns will send in a digital copy of his Appearance of Fairness Forms. Tami Pokorny asked the members of the CFCOC whether there were any objections to the participation of any members, whether anyone stood to gain financially, whether everyone was able to hear the proposal fairly, whether any members had anything to declare, and whether they had all seen the video or attended the site visit for the Lower Chimacum Creek Mainstem, the North Barry, and the Schmidt Farm projects. There were no issues with the appearance of fairness for any Committee members on any of the projects. Review of Ranking Process Tami Pokorny gave an overview of the ranking and scoring process for the projects. A project must score at least 70% to make it automatically worthy of funding. The Committee may vote to consider a lower scored project worthy of funding. Presentation of Composite Scores for: Lower Chimacum Creek Mainstem: 70% North Barry: 67% Schmidt Farm: 74% Project Ranking and Funding Recommendations The three project requests summed to $186,000; the Committee had $230,000 available for this funding round. Rob Harbour moved to find all three projects worthy of funding; Richard Jahnke seconded. Ron Rempel led discussion on the question of worthiness of the Schmidt Farm project. Although the project scored highly, Ron pointed out that this was due to a lot of erroneous information in the project details and suggested that the Committee consider how to address that in future projects. Rob Harbour agreed that he did not accept the habitat claims of the project, but he still viewed it as a valuable agricultural project. Kalyn Marab noted that the agricultural claims were a stretch because the owners were only leasing the land for a couple of horses. Mary Biskup added that the soils were good for agricultural use. The group discussed how to score agricultural properties more accurately; how to gauge habitat claims and discern where habitat information comes from; how to fairly weight the three main categories of agriculture, habitat, and silviculture; and the importance of restricting development and protecting land in perpetuity. Cameron Jones suggested that this would be a good conversation to have in a workshop where the Committee could get some clarity on information sources. Dave Wilkinson brought up the Committee’s understanding of property easements; this easement only allowed for potentially, sometime in the future, some kind of restoration to take place if the landowner desired. He agreed that some of the statements in the application were misleading, and questioned how to handle situations when information in an application was incomplete, inaccurate by omission, or had a lack of clarity. Mary added that the conservation easement may help future farmers afford the property with its prime agricultural land. Ron pointed out that the property had only 0.01 CFS of water available, so there was not much water for farming. Rob mentioned that dry land farming had a future in the area, and that there was value in protecting the land now for a potentially beneficial future use. The Committee voted on the motion with eleven members in favor of finding the three projects worthy of funding, and one member voting against. The motion passed. Kalyn asked Ron if he voted against the motion because of the Schmidt Farm project; Ron said yes and that he did not have any issues with the other two projects. Tami Pokorny displayed the project scoresheets, and the group went over the various questions and relative points given. Dave pointed out that the question of how well a sponsor performs under agreement is difficult to answer because the only information the Committee has is from the Project Reports. The best he could come up with is to give this question a mid-value. He suggested that the CFCOC consider restructuring that question to define it more objectively. Rob added that the Jefferson Land Trust did not wish to get involved with the Committee’s request for additional reports in the past, which would have helped to answer that question. Dave noted that because of this, the Committee could only gauge a project’s potential, rather than what a project actually did. Mary asked about the public input question, and what constituted as public input: was a project just within an area that the sponsor designated as important, or was it part of a public vetting process? Dave also brought up the climate change question that the CFCOC had tried to write to address global climate change; responses had largely been about whether the specific properties would be resilient, so the question might not be completely clear. The group discussed how to measure impact and weight points, especially at scale. Richard Jahnke noted that it was good to have different scores and points of view in the Committee. Ron Rempel moved to fund all three projects at their requested amounts; Joanne Pontrello seconded. The CFCOC talked about whether to rank the projects but did not do so. The motion passed unanimously. VII. Announcements/Administrative Staff Update Tami Pokorny said that the County had hired John Gussman to photograph approved CFCOC projects. Central Services was interested in helping the Committee make story maps. Dave Wilkinson suggested that the group make bullet points about each project, and then make sure those points were captured in the videos. Richard Jahnke mentioned that the project applications were listed on the County website, but not on the map. *Tami will investigate that. She also asked the group to think about how to get more high-quality project photos. Tami added that the Quimper Wildlife Corridor project was on the verge of closing and could close around 6/2/23. Next Meeting The group discussed what they wanted to accomplish at the next meeting, how much time to put into project materials, how to rank Operations and Management versus acquisition or combination projects, how to set up a workshop with sponsors to attract new sponsors and get feedback, and the possibility of partnerships between new sponsors. Tami Pokorny went over some difficulties in working with new sponsors due to County legal requirements. *Ron Rempel requested a County map to search out areas that had never received funding or applied for projects. Tami Pokorny noted that the West End had a different legacy and was just starting to consider acquisitions. Cameron Jones suggested forming a subcommittee to go over the items discussed; Ron suggested scheduling a meeting first that might inform the subcommittee. Ron Rempel moved to ask Tami to schedule a meeting for midsummer to discuss the approach to scoring and following that to form a subcommittee to work on the associated language; Rob Harbour seconded. Discussion followed on the timing and topics of the meeting. Mary Biskup suggested that Committee members email their areas of interest to Tami so that the group can have an idea of where the concerns were. The motion passed unanimously. *Tami asked the group to let her know whether they intended to attend the next Board of County Commissioners hearing, and to send her quotes about the projects they had approved. VII. Guest Observer Comments Ron Rempel commented that he liked the East Jefferson Fire and Rescue meeting hall for meeting in. *Tami Pokorny said she would aim to reserve it for the next CFCOC meeting. IX. Adjournment Chair Cameron Jones adjourned the meeting at 4:38 PM. Meeting summary prepared by Rebekah Brooks. Action Items: *Guy Dobyns will send in a digital copy of his Appearance of Fairness Forms. *Tami Pokorny will investigate the CFCOC project map on the County website. *Ron Rempel requested a County map to search out areas that had never received funding or applied for projects. *Tami asked the group to let her know whether they intended to attend the next Board of County Commissioners hearing, and to send her quotes about the projects they had approved. *Tami said she would aim to reserve the East Jefferson Fire and Rescue meeting hall for the next CFCOC meeting.