HomeMy WebLinkAbout501041038 Geotech Assessment (2007)GEOTECH
CONSULTANTS, INC.
Celebrating 2l1 Ye~c~s 198b-2006
1325b Northeast 20th Street, Suite lb
Bellevue, Washington 9$005
(425) 747-5b18 FAX (425) 747-85b1
1 ~ ~ ,~_
~,, ~ ~
~- :~
Bosworth Hoedemaker LLC
~ 408 North 45th Street
Seafitle, Washington 98103
Attention: Jessie Temple
Proposal: Review 0f Civil Engineering Drawings
Proposed Coyle House.
549 Thousand Trails Road
Jefferson County, Washington
Dear Mr. Temple:
r4. Y,. l iI ,J I ~;. 8
June 6, 2007
JN o~2s9
via email: Jessie a~boswvrthhoedemaker. com
we have com feted a review of the geotechnical aspect of the civil engineering
As requested, p
r the ro Deed Co [e House to be constructed in Jefferson County. For our review we
drawings fo p p Y
with the three sheets of civil engineering drawings prepared by Browne Engineering,
were provided
Inc. dated May 25, 2007.
review of the drawin s all water collected from roof and impervious areas will be
Based on our g
o dischar a at a dis ersion basin located at the toe of the steep slope. Can the steep
t~ghtl~ned t g p
i e will be laid on the surface of the slope, This prevents the need for
slope itself, HDPE p p and has a !ow
excavatin a trench into the face of the steep slope. This type of pipe is strong
9 ..
' ~ llama ell in the event that it is undermined by future soil movement on the steep
potent~a[ for bung g
slope.
ovided tans are enera[ly consistent with our recommendations and
Based on our review, the pr p g ~ n es that we
tations for this site. We do have two minor comments regarding cha g
our expec
' im octant to revent water from following the trench line between the
suggest for the plans. It is p p the ~ e trench
use and the to of the steep slope. As a result we recommend that p p
proposed ho p
~ the etas slo a be bac[~filled entirely with compacted on3s~te silty
wdth,n at least ~0 feet of the pop of p p .. 50-foot
ree-drainin ravel bedding should not be used for the pipe within this min:mum
sand. F 9 9 }! oured in the i e trench on the
stretch of the trench. Additionally, a concrete dam should be p ~ p p
nchor CB. This concrete "dam should be poured under and
downstream, western, side of the A would be
d extend to within a roximately 2 feet of the f~nai ground surface. It ,
around the pipe an pp nch so that there ~s direct
im octant that an loosened soil be removed from the bottom of the tie
p y ~ rbed soil.
contact between the concrete "dam" and the und~stu
GEOT~CH CONSULTANTS, lNC.
JUG 1 T.1U`:
Bosworth Noedemaker
June 6, 2007
05289
Page 2
Please contact us if you have any questions regarding this letter or if we can be of further
assistance.
Respectfully submitted,
GE~TECH CONSULTANTS, INC.
yra~.u~,. ~, 'r
gib' ,,,~,~`aT 'r . , ~ , ~'' ;~'; . yt~
~,~.
";~,~, ~
.~
,+.: f:
;Tb~,_CG~ ~~.~i4irj~ V ~,~
~'
., ~ . ~~~
~ ~ ~.
~.
~.
V ~-
~ v
Marc R. McGinnis
Principal
MRM:jyb
~ r~.r~ ~ ~ f ~ v
~~ ~ ~ ~ ~.
~ ~ ~ ~ I i ~r.,1 ~ ~
.r ~ ~~. ~ ~ ~ ~~i:
1 /~ '~ I„
,r
r~
'L,, ~'~U ~ '~ '",
GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC.