HomeMy WebLinkAboutNEPA categorical exclusionCE per PA 1/17/24
1/17/24Jodie Beall Digitally signed by Jodie Beall
Date: 2024.01.17 11:50:11
-08'00'
DOT Form 140-100EF Page 2
Revised 10/2022
Part 3 - Permits, Approvals & Right of Way (ROW)
Yes No Permit or Approval Yes No Permit or Approval
Corps of Engineers Sec. 10 Sec. 404
Nationwide Type 14 (Linear Transportation)
Individual Permit No. ___________________
Coastal Zone Management Certification
Critical Areas Ordinance (CAO) Permit
Forest Practices Act Permit
Hydraulic Project Approval
Local Building or Site Development Permits
Local Clearing and Grading Permit
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
(NPDES) Baseline General for Construction
Shoreline Permit
State Waste Discharge Permit
Water Rights Permit
Water Quality Certification Section 401
Issued by USACE or Ecology (WDOE)__________
Tribal Permit(s) (if any) ____________________
Other Permits (List) _______________________
Is permanent ROW acquisition needed? If yes,
amount needed: __43 acres__ (acres/sq. ft.).
Is any temporary ROW needed?
Is relocation required?
Has ROW (property and/or property interests)
been acquired for this project prior to the NEPA start date?
If yes, documentation demonstrating compliance with 23
CFR 710.501 may be required.
Is a detour required? If yes, please attach detour
information.
U.S. Coast Guard Permitting
a. Does the project propose any new or modify any existing bridges or culverts crossing a waterway? Yes No
b. If Yes, attach a copy of the jurisdictional determination email or letter from the U.S. Coast Guard.
Other Federal Agencies - Does the project involve any federal properties, approvals or funding from other/additional
federal agencies? Yes No If Yes, please describe. USACE Section 404 permit.
Part 4 - Environmental Considerations
Will the project involve work in or affect any of the following? Identify proposed mitigation.
Attach additional pages or supplemental information if necessary.
1. Air Quality - Identify any anticipated air quality issues.
Is the project exempt from Air Quality conformity requirements? Yes No
a. If Yes, identify exemption please refer to Appendix G in the CE Guidebook for a list of exemptions.
(Bicycle and pedestrian facilities)
b. Is the project located in an Air Quality Non-Attainment Area or Maintenance Area for carbon monoxide,
ozone or PM 10 or PM 2.5? Yes No
2. Critical and Sensitive Areas
a. Is this project within a sole source aquifer Yes No
If located within a sole source aquifer, is the project exempt from EPA approval?
If Yes, please list exemption: _________________________________________________________
If No, date of EPA approval: _________________________________________________________
b. Will this project impact Species/Habitat other than ESA listed species? Yes No Explain your answer.
c. Is this project within one mile of a Bald Eagle nesting territory, winter concentration area or communal roost?
Yes No If Yes, the local agency must go to the US Fish & Website (https://www.fws.gov/story/do-i-need-
eagle-take-permit) and review the information under When is a permit recommended?. Please explain why a permit
is or is not needed:
Please attach a copy of the permit if needed.
d. Are wetlands present within the project area? Yes No If Yes, estimate the impact in acres: _0.104____
Please attach a copy of the proposed mitigation plan.
DOT Form 140-100EF Page 3
Revised 10/2022
Compensatory wetland and buffer mitigation has been proposed within the project trail corridor on site as described
in the Conceptual Critical Areas Stewardship Plan (Otak 2023) prepared for the project. The proposed mitigation plan
will be reviewed by the USACE during 404 permitting, and by Ecology and Jefferson County during county land use
permit reviews. If agencies do not approve of on-site mitigation, then in lieu fee credits will be purchased from the
gram that has been federally reviewed and approved for
compensatory wetland mitigation.
3. Cultural Resources/Historic Structures Identify any historic, archaeological or cultural resources present within the
Does the project fit into any of the exempt types of projects listed in Appendix J of the CE Guidebook?
Yes No If Yes, note exemptions below.
If No: Date of DAHP concurrence: September 8, 2023________________________________
Date of Tribal consultation(s) (if applicable): _________________________________
Adverse effects on cultural/historic resources? Yes No
If Yes, date of approved Section 106 MOA: ________________________________
4. Floodplains and Floodways
a. Is the project located in a 100-year floodplain? Yes No
b. If Yes, is the project located within a 100-year floodway? Yes No
c. Will the project impact a 100-year floodplain? Yes No If Yes, describe impacts.
DOT Form 140-100EF Page 4
Revised 10/2022
5.Hazardous and Problem Waste Identify potential sources and type(s).
a. Does the project require excavation below the existing ground surface? Yes No
b. Will groundwater be encountered? Yes No
c. Will any properties be acquired as part of this project? Yes No
d. Is this site located in an undeveloped area (i.e. no buildings, parking, storage areas or agriculture? Yes No
e. Is the project located within a one-mile radius of a known Superfund Site? Yes No
f. Is this project located within a ½-mile radius of a site or sites listed on any of the following Department of
Ecology databases? Yes No If Yes, check the appropriate boxes below.
Voluntary Cleanup Program (VCP), State Cleanup Site (SCS), or Independent Cleanup Program (ICP)
Underground Storage Tank (UST)
Leaking Underground Storage Tank (LUST)
Confirmed and Suspected Contaminated Sites List (CSCSL)
g. Has site reconnaissance (windshield survey) been performed? Yes No (Please identify any
properties not identified in the Ecology or ERS database search as an attachment -- name, address and property
use).
h. Based on the information above and project specific activities, is there a potential for the project to generate,
acquire or encounter contaminated soils, groundwater or surface water? Yes No
Please explain: Shallow excavation (< 1 ft) will occur along Four Corners Road on the opposite side of the road from the
known cleanup sites to construct the trail at grade. Additional grading and excavation will occur along the utility corridor
and forest lands that are undeveloped and not in the vicinity of known contaminated sites or potential sources of
contamination. See the Hazardous Materials Report prepared for the project.
If you responded Yes to any of these questions above (5A 5F or 5H -
DOT Form 140-100EF Page 5
Revised 10/2022
Part 4 - Environmental Considerations (continued)
6. Noise
a. Does the project involve constructing a new roadway? Yes No
b. Is there a change in the vertical or horizontal alignment of the existing roadway? Yes No
c. Does the project increase the number of through traffic lanes on an existing roadway? Yes No
d. Is there a change in the topography? Yes No
e. Are there auxiliary lanes extending 1-½ miles or longer being constructed as part of this project?
Yes No
f. If you answered Yes to any of the preceding questions, identify and describe any potential noise receptors within
the project area and subsequent impacts to those noise receptors. Please attach a copy of the noise analysis if
required.
The proposed project includes grading within the utility corridor and forest lands to construct the trail with less than
five percent grade for ADA compliance. However, the trail is for non-motorized pedestrian and bicycle users and will
not impact noise receptors. No noise mitigation measures are proposed.
If impacts are identified, describe proposed mitigation measures.
7. 4(f)/6(f) Resources: parks, recreation areas, wildlife refuges, historic properties, wild & scenic rivers,
scenic byways
a. Please identify any 4(f) properties within the project limits and the areas of impacts.
The proposed trail section will connect the Larry Scott Trail to Anderson Lake State Park. The trails are maintained
by Jefferson County Public Works. The project will not impact any 4(f) resources because the northern terminus
will tie into Milo Curry Road and southern trail terminus ends at the ROW boundary.
b. Please identify any properties within the project limits that used funds from the Land & Water Conservation
Fund Act.
Not applicable.
c. Please list any Wild and Scenic Rivers and Scenic Byways within the project limits. Not applicable.
8. Agricultural Lands
a. Are there agricultural lands within 300 feet of the project limits? Yes No If Yes, describe impacts:
b. Are impacted lands considered to be unique and prime farmland? Yes No
If Yes, date of project review by Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS): ____July 26, 2023_________
DOT Form 140-100EF Page 6
Revised 10/2022
9. Rivers, Streams (continuous or intermittent) or Tidal Waters
a. Identify all waterbodies within 300 feet of the project limits or that will otherwise be impacted.
Watercourses within the study area include three non-fish habitat, seasonally flowing streams with 50-foot buffer
widths per Jefferson County Code 18.22.630(1). Two streams were delineated within the utility corridor and trail
easements (Stream 1 and Stream 2), and one stream (Stream 3) was observed from the right of way east of the trail
corridor. Stream 1 is currently piped under the utility access road, and an additional approximately 131 LF of Stream 1
will be piped for the trail crossing. Stream 2, which is a groundwater seep on a hillside that infiltrates in uplands
approximately 100 feet downslope, will be filled and incorporated into the site drainage plan.
Summary of Streams in Study Area
Stream Name Stream Characteristics Stream Type1 Buffer (ft)
Stream 1 Seasonal, nonfish Type Ns 50
Stream 2 Seasonal, nonfish Type Ns 50
Stream 3 Seasonal, nonfish Type Ns 50
1Stream Type determined per JCC 18.22.630.
b. Identify stream crossing structures by type.
The only stream crossing structure in the project corridor is the existing 30-inch diameter pipe culvert on Stream 1 for
the existing utility access road. An additional 131 LF of Stream 1 will be piped to support the trail crossing. No other
stream crossing structures are proposed.
Part 4 - Environmental Considerations (continued)
10. Tribal Lands Identify whether the project will occur within any Tribal lands, including reservation, trust and fee
lands. Please do not list usual and accustomed area. Tribal Lands do not occur in the project area.
11. Water Quality/Stormwater
a.
management manual for eastern/western Washington or a local agency equivalent
manual? Yes No
Explain proposed water quality/quantity treatment for the new and any existing pollution generating impervious
surface associated with the proposed project.
The project will not result in any new PGIS. Existing PGIS at the SR 20 and 4 Corners road crossings will continue to
sheet flow into roadside ditches and infiltrate. Stormwater from the paved trail will flow into infiltration or dispersion
trenches and infiltrate in uplands.
b. Amount of existing pollution generating impervious surface within the project limits: Approx. 925 SF
c. Net new pollution generating impervious surface to be created as a result of this project: _______0 SF________
d. Amount of proposed post-project untreated pollution generating impervious surface: _0 SF______________
12. Previous Environmental Commitments
Describe previous environmental commitments that may affect or be affected by the project if any.
None.
DOT Form 140-100EF Page 7
Revised 10/2022
13. Environmental Justice -Does the project meet any of the exemptions noted in Appendix L of the CE
Documentation Guidebook?
If Yes, please note the exemption and appropriate justification in the space below.
If No, attach Appendix M and supporting documentation as required per the decision matrix. This will include at least
two demographic information sources and possibly a description of anticipated project impacts.
Please refer to the CE Guidebook for more information.
Part 5 - Biological Assessments and EFH Evaluations
1.
Yes No Attach species listings.
Affected ESA Listed Species
2. Will any construction work occur
within 0.25 mile of any of the
following?
3. Does the project involve blasting, pile
driving, concrete sawing, rock-drilling
or rock-scaling activity within one mile
of any of the following?
Oregon Spotted Frog proposed critical
habitat or suitable habitat?
Yes No Yes No
Yellow-billed Cuckoo suitable habitat? Yes No Yes No
Spotted Owl management areas,
designated critical habitat or suitable
habitat?
Yes No Yes No
Marbled Murrelet nest or occupied stand,
designated critical habitat or suitable
habitat?
Yes No Yes No
Western Snowy Plover designated critical
habitat?
Yes No Yes No
Is the project within 0.25 mile of marine
waters? If Yes explain potential effects on
Killer Whales and on Marbled Murrelet
foraging areas.
Yes No Yes No
Killer Whale designated critical habitat? Yes No Yes No
Grizzly Bear suitable habitat? Yes No Yes No
Gray Wolf suitable habitat? Yes No Yes No
Canada Lynx habitat? Yes No Yes No
Columbia White-tailed Deer suitable
habitat?
Yes No Yes No
Woodland Caribou habitat? Yes No Yes No
Streaked Horned Lark designated critical
habitat or suitable habitat?
Yes No Yes No
habitat or suitable habitat?
Yes No Yes No
Mazama Pocket Gopher designated
critical habitat or suitable habitat?
Yes No Yes No
Eulachon designated critical habitat or
suitable habitat?
Yes No Yes No
Rockfish proposed critical habitat or
suitable habitat?
Yes No Yes No
DOT Form 140-100EF Page 8
Revised 10/2022
A mature coniferous or mixed forest
stand?
Yes No Yes No
4. Will the project involve any in-water work? Yes No
5. Will any construction work occur within 300 feet of any perennial or intermittent Yes No
waterbody that either supports or drains to waterbody supporting listed fish?
6. Will any construction work occur within 300 feet of any wetland, pond or lake that Yes No
is connected to any permanent or intermittent waterbody?
7. Does the action have the potential to directly or indirectly impact designated critical Yes No
habitat for salmonids (including adjacent riparian zones)?
8. Will the project discharge treated or untreated stormwater runoff or utilize water Yes No
from a waterbody that supports or drains into a listed-fish supporting waterbody?
9. Will construction occur outside the existing pavement? If Yes go to 9a. Yes No
9a. Will construction activities occurring outside the existing pavement involve clearing, Yes No
grading, filling or modification of vegetation or tree-cutting?
10. Are there any Federally listed Threatened or Endangered plant species located within Yes No
the project limits? If Yes, please attach a list of these plant species within the action area.
11. Yes No
Analysis for No Effects Determination If there are any Yes answers to questions in Part 5, additional analysis is
required. Attach additional sheets if needed.
ESA-listed species, suitable habitat for ESA-listed species, and designated critical habitat (DCH) do not occur within
the project area. The trail project occurs along a previously disturbed road corridor (4 Corners Road), cleared and
maintained power line corridor, and recently logged and active forest lands. In-water work includes piping 131 LF of
Stream 1 and filling Stream 2, both of which are Type Ns (no-fish habitat, seasonal) streams with no fish presence.
The nonmotorized trail is for pedestrian use and will not result in new PGIS. Although there may be suitable nest
trees for marbled murrelet in Anderson Lake State Park, there are no suitable habitat patches within 0.25-mile of
the project corridor. The Discovery Bay shoreline is approximately 0.17 mile west of the western trail terminus near
the Larry Scott Trail, and no blasting, pile-driving or other significant noises will be generated by the project that
could disturb foraging by murrelets.
Analysis for RRMP ESA 4(d) determination for NMFS A local agency must be certified by the Regional Road
Maintenance Forum to utilize 4(d).
Maintenance Category (check all that apply)
1. Roadway Surface 6 Stream Crossings 11. Emergency Slide/Washout Repair
2. Enclosed Drainage Systems 7. Gravel Shoulders 12. Concrete
3. Cleaning Enclosed Drainage Systems 8. Street Surface Cleaning 13. Sewer Systems
4. Open Drainage Systems 9. Bridge Maintenance 14. Water Systems
5. Watercourses and Streams 10. Snow and Ice Control 15. Vegetation
Describe how the project fits in the RRMP 4(d) Program:
DOT Form 140-100EF Page 9
Revised 10/2022
Effect Determinations for ESA and EFH
determination is anticipated), a separate biological assessment document is required.
NMFS USFWS EFH Determination
No Effect ________________ ________________ No Adverse Effect
NLTAA - Date of Concurrence ________________ ________________ Adverse Effect Date of NMFS
LTAA Date BO Issued ________________ ________________ concurrence __________________
RRMP 4(d) ________________ Not Applicable
Part 6 - FHWA Comments
1/17/24 1/17/24