HomeMy WebLinkAbout08 August 11
JEFFERSDN COUNTY BOARD OF EQUALIZATION
A.C. Dalgleish
David G. Douglas
Archie L. Barber, Jr.
James A. Deleo
Chairman
Vice-Chairman
Member
Al ternate
MINUTES
11 August 1986
The meeting was called to order at 9:00 A.M. by Chairman Dalgleish. All Board members
and Clerk were present. Mr. McCready and Mr. Shold represented the Assessor's Office.
BOE-86-040LOI Parcel No. 939-900-0D9: Virginia Jennings appeared in behald of the
Petitioner and stipulated that the lot was purchased on 10-07-85 for $21,000 cash
as an investment and to protect the view from their home lot next door.
The Assessor reported that the previous owner was in the Pickett interest; and been
listed for $24,500; and therefore, may have been ~old in the interest of cash flow
needs. The Assessor further recommended adjustments in valuation for four parcels
on the Bluff in Cape George Division I --
Lots 7 & 8 fron $28,500 to $24,500
Lot 9 from $24,500 to $22,500
Lot 10 fron $24,000 to $20,000 plus $1,000 for utility improvements.
Pet. Sub. Pa rce 1 Number Lot Numbers Block No. Valuations
No. Prevo NOW
038- 01 993-600-101 1 & 2 & W40' of 1 2,210 2,950
3 & 4
038-02 993-600-201 1, 2, & 3 2 3,000 4,000
038-03 993-600-202 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 2 5,000 6,675
038-04 993-600-204 13 - 18 2 5,700 7,600
038-05 993-600-301 1 - 20 3 20,025 26,700
030-06 993-600-401 1 - 20 4 20,025 26,700
038-07 993-600-503 10 - 13 5 4,000 5,340
038-08 993-600-504 14 -18 5 5;000 6,675
038-09 993-600-506 9 5 1,000 1,335
038-10 951-904-001 1 - 20 Fowlers Park 40 27,750 20,000
The matter of perk in these parcels may affect the valuation of the parcels. The
Bank did not have a record of the revaluation of Parcel No. 951-904-001 prior to
the hearing. They now withfraw their appeal on this parcel.
.
The Assessor acknowledged that there was a clerical error in transcriting the
valuations of the nine other parcels to the 1986 tax rolls without. recognizing the
changes in valuation set by the Board of Equalization in their 1985 session.
BOE-86-037LOI Parcel No. 961-200-102: The Petitioners were unable to attend the
hearing. The Petition stipulates that the owners have been truing to sell the property
for the past six years at $6,000; there are no street, water or sewer improvements
to the parcel; and referred to two realtors for current listings of the parcel.
The Assessor presented a map showing the proximity of utilities; stated that valuations
may reflect the proximity of utilities; and submitted 8 comparables in the area --
see comparables 2, 7 and 8 in particular.
BOE-86-039R/ Parcel No. 002-122-002: The Petitioners were unable to attend.
The Petiton st~pulated that the parcel was purchased in December, 1985 for $51,500;
The asking price in 1984 was $59,500 and in 1985 was $55,000; and further questioned
that the valuation today is more than they paid for the property.
The Assessor reported that the parcel has 180 feet of high-bank, view property on
the water front with a military bunker approcimately 11' x 15'; were unable to
gain access, into the bunker to determine either interior s~ze or improvements;
further, recommended consideration valuation on the basis of $175 per front foot
on land ($50,000) and $1,500 for the bunker.
BOE-86-041LO/ Parcel No. 948-336-201: The Petitioner was not present at the hearing.
The Petition stipulates that the parcel was purchased on 04-25-79 for an undesignated
price and is currently listed for $18,000; further, that an adjacen half block 308
sold in January, 1985, for $13,000.
The Assessor (Shold) reported that the half block 308 has been sold in 4 sites
for building at a price of $12,000 per site due to access to utilities since the
sale to Lamber. It was recommended that it be determined when and where utilities
served block 308, 309, 310 and 311 and to review topography of these blocks and the
parcel in question.
BOE-86-042R/ Parcel No. 965-702-808: The Petitioner did not appear at this hearing.
The Petition stipulates that the parcel is a victorian residence with a zoning variance
for a Bed and Breakfast business; was purchased in December 1985 for $210,000;
was appra i sed by Isl and Savi ngs and Loan in December, 1985, for $150,000; and further
submitted three comparables (see folder for details).
The Assessor pointed out that the State Statutes require that the valuation be
fair market valuation; that the State Auditor reprted to the County Assessor that
there was $40,000 in personal property in the residence; and further recommends
that the valuation be adjusted to $32,000 for the land and $137,500 for a total
of $170,000.
Tere being no further hearings scheduled for this day, the Board adjourned until
9:00 A.M., on Wednesday, the 13th of August.
APPROVED BY:
DATE
"ii:
,.' .../
" e,~
C/A~IJ
~
.C. DAL E H, CHAIRMAN
PREPARED BY:
Carolyn J. Lea, Clerk
-CHAIRMAN
lt1; _.: "\ LO,) ~t...-<'- i
ARCHIE L. BARBER JR., MEMBER