HomeMy WebLinkAbout58-1028-24R STATE OF WASHINGTON
COUNTY OF JEFFERSON
In the Matter of Jefferson County's
Intent to Vacate a Portion of Platted Mitchell RESOLUTION NO. 58-1028-24R
Street and Duffv Avenue Rights-of-Way
WHEREAS, Jefferson County Code Title 12 Public Ways and Places governs Right-of-
Way Permits and Places, including road vacations in Chapter 12.10 JCC; and
WHEREAS, Jefferson County Public Works requires permits for any activity by a
citizen or business that impacts a county road or public right-of-way, in order to protect the
infrastructure and the public's safety and investment. Public Works reviews and processes
applications for road approaches,utilities and other right-of-way uses, as well as requests for
road vacations
WHEREAS,Jefferson County Public Works has received and reviewed a petition submitted
by Robert Zimmermann and Beth Orling ("Petitioner") to vacate only those portions of unopened
Mitchell Street and Duffy Avenue rights-of-way located north and west of the existing Thorndyke
Road right-of-way in the northwest quarter of the northwest quarter of Section 20, Township 27
North, Range 1 East, W.M.,both of which are 30-foot wide rights-of-way dedicated in the Plat of
Goodfellow's Manhattan Beach Tracts, filed on July 8, 1908 and recorded in Volume 2 of Plats
Page 122, records of Jefferson County and which rights-of-way abut Tax Parcel 954-600-201
owned by Petitioner; and
WHEREAS, the Jefferson County Hearing Examiner held a public hearing on the road
vacation petition on July 26, 2024;and
WHEREAS,the Jefferson County Hearing Examiner considered testimony of Petitioner and
Public Works staff(no other public testimony or comments provided during hearing); reports from
the Department of Community Development and the County Engineer,both recommending approval
of the petition; and a Public Works Staff Report documenting compliance with vacation notice
requirements;and
WHEREAS, the Jefferson County Hearing Examiner has issued a report dated October 11,
2024("Hearing Examiner Report")which contains findings,conclusions and a recommendation that
the Board approve the road vacation subject to the Petitioner meeting certain conditions to pay all
required compensation owed to the County for the vacated right-of-way and administrative
process; and
WHEREAS, Petitioner's compensation owed to the County for the vacated right-of-way
includes$10,500 for one-half of the appraised value,plus administrative fees and expenses;and
WHEREAS,upon verification by the Public Works Department that Petitioner has met all
of the conditions identified above, and pursuant to Chapter 36.87 RCW and Chapter 12.10 JCC,the
Board shall adopt a resolution officially granting the petition and vacating and abandoning the
subject rights-of-way described above; and
WHEREAS,the administrative expenses are over-and-above the staff time allowed under the
application fee,with the clarification that such administrative fees and expenses shall include the costs
for preparing and recording(by County staff)a Final Resolution approving the vacation of the subject
rights-of-way;and
WHEREAS, if Petitioner fails to meet the required conditions within one year from the
date of this Resolution, or any approved extension, the vacation process shall terminate, in which
case Petitioner shall remain liable for all administrative costs actually incurred by the County.
WHEREAS, the Jefferson County Board of Commissioners has considered the Hearing
Examiner Report and the recommendations contained therein;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF
JEFFERSON COUNTY,WASHINGTON,HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Whereas Clauses are Findings of Fact. The Jefferson County Board of Commissioners
hereby adopts the above "Whereas"clauses as Findings of Fact.
Section 2. Purpose. The Board of County Commissioners hereby adopts the Hearing Examiner's
findings, conclusions and recommendations as reflected in the Hearing Examiner's Report dated
October 11, 2024.
Section 3. Severability. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or section of this
Resolution or its application to any person or circumstance is held invalid, the remainder of this
Resolution or its application to other persons or circumstances shall be fully valid and shall not be
affected.
Section 4. SEPA Categorical Exemption. This Resolution is categorically exempt from the State
Environmental Policy Act under WAC 197-11-800 (19).
Section 5. Effective Date. This Resolution shall take effect and be in full force immediately upon
passage by the Board of County Commissioners.
(SIGNATURES FOLLOW ON THE NEXT PAGE)
p ti^
ADOPTED and APPROVED this am day of October, 2024.
SEAL: JEFFERSON COUNTY BOARD OF
COUNTY OMMISSIONERS
Kate e
setqcks 4.:. e......i �Gy
o lit•. a41
Gr otherton, Member
•sy8`•..• _...,° Heidi Eisenhour, Member
%44 W4 \4 .....
a'w.lu....ff"
ATTES . APPROV AS T FORM:
1l e ai, !O Isi 2y Q. C October 30,2024
Caro n G away,CMC Date Philip C. Hunsucker, Date
Chief Civil Deputy Prosecuting Attorney
1 Before Hearing Examiner
Gary N. McLean
2
3
4 BEFORE THE HEARING EXAMINER
FOR JEFFERSON COUNTY
5
6 In the Matter of the Petition to Vacate a )
7 portion of platted Mitchell Street and )
Duffy Avenue rights-of-way, submitted by) Project File No.97024001
8 )
ROBERT ZIMMERMAN& ) FINDINGS,CONCLUSIONS, AND
9 ELIZABETH ORLING, ) RECOMMENDATION OF
APPROVAL TO THE BOARD OF
I 0 ) COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Principal Petitioners/Property Owners )
11 )
12
l 3 I. SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATION.
14 The petition should be granted,vacating portions of County right-of-way now
known as Mitchell Street and Duffy Avenue.
15
II.JURISDICTION.
16
17 This matter came before the Hearing Examiner who is responsible for conducting a
public hearing on all petitions for road vacations; reviewing such petitions, the written staff
18 report, and applicable criteria found in JCC 12.10.110; and receiving public testimony in
support of or opposing the proposed road vacation. Following the public hearing, the
19 Examiner is tasked with providing a written recommendation to the Board of County
Commissioners to grant or deny the petition, with any conditions of approval. (See JCC
20 12.10.080).
21
III. RECORD.
22
Exhibits entered into evidence as part of the record, and an audio recording of
23 testimony provided at the public hearing,are maintained by the Jefferson County Department
of Public Works, in accord with applicable law. In this Recommendation, materials included
24
25
RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE PETITION FOR
6 ROAD VACATION—PORTIONS OF MITCHELL GARY N.MCLEAN
STREET AND DUFFY AVENUE — HEARING EXAM.NER
PROJECT FILE NO.97024001 FOR JEFFERSON COUNTY
Page I of 9
as part of the Record are numbered and identified as follows:
1
2 Staff Report, from Colette Kostelec, Engineer III, Dept. of Public Works, recommending
approval,with the following exhibits:
3
1. Vicinity Map and Annotated Parcel Map;
4 2. Distribution list and sample notice transmitted to various departments and agencies;
3. List of adjacent property owners with sample notice,map of property owners receiving notice;
5 4. Publication Notice; and
6 5. Declaration of Posting.
7 County Engineer's Report, from Monte Reinders, Public Works Director/County Engineer,
recommending approval,with the following attached exhibits:
8
A. Vicinity and parcel maps;
B. Annotated Plat map;
1 C. Petition for Vacation of Right-of-Way;
D. Contour and Lidar map;
I I E. DCD Report; and
F. Appraisal Report.
12
Below is a list of individuals called to present testimony under oath at the duly noticed
13 public hearing for this matter, held using the Zoom online meeting platform coordinated by
14 County staff on July 26, 2024:
15 1. Colette Kostelec,Engineer III/Right-of-Way Representative,for the County's Department of
Public Works, prepared the Staff Report issued for this petition, summarized her
1 recommendation of approval with limited conditions, noted that the County received no
6 written comments before the hearing in opposition to the requested vacation,explained how
the platted rights-of-way will all revert to the principal petitioners, Mr. Zimmerman/Ms.
17 Orling;and
18 2. Robert Zimmerman,one of the principal petitioners,appeared on his own behalf,expressed
satisfaction with Staff Report,did not object to Staff's analysis or recommenced conditions,
19 explained his point of view about a possible stream on or near his property.
20 No one appeared during the public hearing to submit written comments or verbal
testimony opposing or questioning this road vacation. The Examiner has had a full and fair
21 opportunity to consider all evidence submitted as part of the record; has reviewed and
22 researched relevant codes, caselaw, and ordinances; reviewed current mapping and legal
instruments relevant to this application and is fully advised. Accordingly, this
23 Recommendation is now in order.
24
25
RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE PETITION FOR
6 ROAD VACATION—PORTIONS OF MITCHELL GARY N.MCLEAN
STREET AND DUFFY AVENUE — HEARING EXAMINER
PROJECT FILE NO.97024001 FOR IFEFERSON COUNTY
Page 2 of 9
1
2 IV. FINDINGS OF FACT.
3 1. Any statements of fact or findings set forth in previous or subsequent portions of this
Recommendation that are deemed to be findings of fact are hereby adopted and incorporated
4 herein as such. Captions are used for some groups of findings but should not be construed to
modify the language of any finding,as they are only provided to make it easier for readers to
5 identify some of the key topics addressed in this Recommendation.
6 2. The portions of Mitchell Street and Duffy Avenue at issue in this road vacation
7 petition are located west of Thorndyke Road, which is inland and west of Hood Canal, near
the principal-petitioner's home, addressed as 2722 Thorndyke Road, on tax parcel no. 954-
8 600-201, in unincorporated Jefferson County. The rights-of-way to be vacated essentially
form the northern and western border of Petitioner's triangular parcel, with Rayonier Forest
9 Resources,LP/Pope Resources("Rayonier")owning property on the other side of the subject
10 right-of-way. (See Engineer's Report, Findings on page 1-2; Staff Report, page 1; Ex. C,
Petition for Vacation; and Ex. A, Vicinity Map and parcel map, showing rights-of-way
I proposed for vacation, a copy of which is republished below).
12 . ,0
uou
13
xn
14 IUWian d rights of way proposed for vacation
15 0111
16 ss®/
17I II
18
19
•
..,n
1 ��
23 .a. .
EXHIBIT A- Vicinity map and parcel map showing rights-of-way proposed
24 for vacation
25
RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE PETITION FOR
26 ROAD VACATION—PORTIONS OF MITCHELL GARY N.MCLEAN
STREET AND DUFFY AVENUE — HEARING EXAMINER
PROJECT FILE NO.97024001 FOR JEFFERSON COUNTY
Page 3 of 9
1 3. As shown above, and as explained in the Staff Report and Engineer's Report issued
2 for this matter, Rayonier owns all property on the other side of the requested road vacations
and has joined the principal-petitioners in seeking approval of the pending vacations. (Staff
3 Report,page 1; testimony of Ms. Kostelec; Ex. C, Petition, last page reflecting signature by
Rayonier representative).
4
4. The petitioners ask that the County vacate the entirety of the 30-foot-wide rights-of-
5 way that were originally dedicated to the County in the Plat of Goodfellow's Manhattan
6 Beach Tracts, filed on July 8, 1908 and recorded in Volume 2 of Plats Page 122, records of
Jefferson County. (Engineer's Report,page 1, and Exhibit B, highlighted plat illustration).
7
5. As noted above, Principal Petitioners are the owners of Tax Parcel 954-600-201
8 legally described as Block 2 of Goodfellow's Manhattan Beach Tracts, except that portion
conveyed to Jefferson County for Thorndyke Road. Rayonier Forest Resources, LP/Pope
9 Resources (Rayonier) owns the property on the other side of the subject rights-of-way, and
signed the Petition for vacation;therefore 100%of the abutting property owners have joined
in the petition to vacate. (Engineer's Report,pages 1-2, and Exhibit C, Petition).
II
6. Although Rayonier and Zimmermann parcels potentially benefit from the subject
12 rights-of-way, only the Zimmermann property is within the plat of Goodfellow's Manhattan
Beach Tracts. Subject to any evidence that the original dedicator (John A. Goodfellow)
13 owned any of the abutting property now owned by Rayonier at the time of platting, the
14 presumption is that the entire width of these rights-of-way would revert to and attach by
operation of law to the Zimmermann parcel upon vacation. (Engineer's Report,page 2).
15
7. No one appeared to offer testimony or evidence at the public hearing—or submitted
16 any written comments in the time period after the public hearing — to rebut the County
17 Engineer's presumption, specifically including representatives for Rayonier. Accordingly,
the Examiner finds and concludes that the entire width of the rights-of-way at issue in this
18 Petition should revert to and attach by operation of law to the Zimmermann parcel upon
vacation.
19
8. According to the Petition, the reason for the requested road vacation is as follows:
20 We wish to dean up the property lines of our parcel,especially on the northern boundary so
that we can buy approximately five adjoining acres from Rayonier in order to settle boundary
21 lines and easement questions caused by their recent survey. The five acres would become an
indivisible part of our existing parcel, Block 2 of Goodfellow's Manhattan Beach Tracts Plat.
22
(See Ex. C to County Engineer's Report, Petition for Vacation of Right of Way, on page I
23 Petitioner's type-written response on form).
24
25
RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE PETITION FOR
26 ROAD VACATION—PORTIONS OF MITCHELL GARY N.MCLEAN
STREET AND DUFFY AVENUE — HEJJUNG EXAMINER
PROJECT FILE NO.97024001 FOR JEFFERSON COUNTY
Page 4 of 9
9. Neither of the subject rights-of-way have ever been opened as a public road or been
1 maintained by Jefferson County. Therefore, the subject rights-of-way meet the definition
2 provided in JCC 12.10.020 for "Class A" road, namely a road "established, dedicated to,
deeded to, or otherwise established by the county for which no public expenditures have been
3 made in the acquisition, improvement, or maintenance of same except those roads platted
prior to March 12, 1904, which remained unopened.for public use for a period of five years
4 after authority was granted for opening them." (County Engineer's Report,page 2).
5 10. The subject rights-of-way do not provide for overall area or neighborhood circulation
6 for the general public, nor is there any anticipated future need for this right-of-way to serve
the general public. The southern portion of Duffy Avenue right-of-way has steep slopes and
7 benches indicating possible past landslide activity. (County Engineer's Report,page 2; See
Exhibit D, contour/lidar map).
8
11. As credibly explained in the unrebutted Engineer's Report,RCW 36.87.040 and JCC
9 12.10.050(2)(e)require the County Engineer to give an opinion as to whether the public will
10 benefit by the vacation; however, neither provide guidance as to what might be considered a
"public benefit"when vacating a public right-of-way. The legislative body is held to be the
I I proper entity to weigh public benefit, and there is a presumption that an ordinance approving
a street vacation was validly enacted for a public purpose (London v. Seattle, 93 Wn.2d 657
12 (1980)). In the absence of any need for a road right-of-way for the benefit of the general
13 public (circulation, trails, utilities, etc.), typically any benefit would accrue to the property
owners with frontage on the vacated right-of-way. These benefits might include additional
14 building space,room for septic systems,green-belt buffer,the ability to keep the public from
trespassing on their property, or other benefits. Benefits to the public and County could
15 include reduced road maintenance costs, reduced liability for managing public right-of-way
(such as garbage dumping,timber theft, danger trees, or abandoned vehicles), and increased
16 property tax. All of these reasons have been used in the past to support road vacations and
could support a finding of public benefit for the vacation of the subject rights-of-way.
17
(County Engineer's Report, on page 2).
18
12. As provided in WAC 197-11-800(2)(i),road vacation matters are exempt from SEPA
19 review.
211 13. Staff confirmed that all public notices were provided in accord with applicable law,
I and that no one submitted any comments or questions that would serve as a basis to deny the
requested petition. (Staff Report; Exhibits 2, 3, 4, and 5, related to notice and comments;
Testimony of Ms. Kostelee).
33 14. As noted above, no one submitted any written comments or testimony during the
public hearing process opposing the pending road vacation petition.
"?4
RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE PETITION FOR
6 ROAD VACATION—PORTIONS OF MITCHELL GARY N.MCLEAN
STREET AND DUFFY AVENUE — HEARINGEXAAm.,ra
PROJECT FILE NO.97024001 FOR JEFFERSON COONII
Page 5 of 9
Review criteria for all road vacation petitions,found in JCC 12.10.110.
15. JCC 12.10.110, captioned "Review Criteria", mandates that road vacation petitions
shall be reviewed according to the following criteria, numbered 1-7. Additional findings by
3 the Hearing Examiner are provided in italics below each of the criteria:
4 (1)The proposed road vacation complies with the Jefferson County comprehensive
plan and any other applicable plans, policies, or ordinances.
5
6County staff from the Public Works and Community Development reviewed the petition and
expressed no concerns regarding the requested vacation. Community Development staff
7 generated a report, summarizing their review of County codes and policies, recommending
approval of this petition. (Staff Report,page 1; Ex. E, DCD report recommending approval
8 of this petition; County Engineer's report).
9 (2) Roads should not be closed, vacated, or abandoned when land uses or
I0 development plans, or occurring patterns, indicate their usefulness for area
circulation. Prior to a vacation decision, an examination should be made of its
I I probable effect on overall area circulation in the neighborhood. Single or multiple
vacations should be considered a positive tool toward improving neighborhood
12 circulation and accesses.
13 The segment of roadways at issue provide no circulation opportunities in the affected area,
14 with DCD Staff offering the following opinion in their report, included as Ex. E: "Based on
the topography and development regulations of this area, DCD believes that it is unlikely
15 that these rights-of-way would ever be developed "
16 (3) The effectiveness of fire, medical, law enforcement, or other emergency services
17 should not be impaired by the closure, vacation, or abandonment of county roads.
Appropriate authorities should be consulted with respect to this policy.
18
The effectiveness of emergency services will not be impaired by this road vacation. The
19 rights-of-way have never been developed, and they have topographic challenges explained
in Ex.E. No opposition to the Notice of Intent to Vacate the subject right-of-way was received
20 from the Sheriff's office, Fire District #1 or JeffCom911, nor was any opposition evidence
21 provided through the entire public hearing process. (Engineer's Report, page 3; Staff
Report,page 1, confirming no objections to requested petition).
22
(4) Roads should not be closed, vacated, or abandoned when such routes can
23 effectively be used for utility corridors. Suitable utility easements could be retained
as a means of satisfying this policy. Public and private utility companies and their
24 plans should be consulted with respect to this policy. In compliance with
25
RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE PETITION FOR
ROAD VACATION—PORTIONS OF MITCHELL GARY N.MCLEAN
STREET AND DUFFY AVENUE — HEARING EXAMINER
PROJECT FILE NO.97024001 FOR JEFFERSON COUNTY
Page 6 of 9
RCW 36.87.140, the board of county commissioners may retain an easement within
1 the subject vacated area for the construction, repair, and maintenance of public
2 utilities and services.
3 No opposition from public or private utility companies or providers was received in response
to the Notice of Intent to Vacate the subject right-of-way. However, if necessary, and in
4 compliance with RCW 36.87.140 and JCC 12.10.130(2)(a), the Board of County
Commissioners may retain an easement within the subject vacated area for the construction,
5 repair, and maintenance of public utilities and services.
6 (5)Roads should not be closed, vacated, or abandoned when such routes can be
7 effectively used for trails or pathways. Suitable trail easements could be retained as a
means of satisfying this policy. The Jefferson County parks, recreation, and open
8 space plan should be used as a guide to determine trail needs.
9 Since the rights-of-way are essentially dead-ends, and do not provide direct public access to
10 water or a beach, and the fact that there are no Jefferson County Parks located within or
currently proposed in the area, the subject right-of-way is not a prime candidate for a public
II trail.
12 (6)In compliance with RCW 36.87.130, no county road or part thereof should be
vacated that abuts on a body of salt or fresh water, unless the vacation is to enable
13 any public authority to acquire the vacated property for port purposes, boat moorage,
14 or launching sites or for park, viewpoint, recreational, educational, or other public
purposes, or unless the property is zoned for industrial purposes.
15
The subject right-of-way, although close to Hood Canal, does not abut the water, so this
16 statutory prohibition does not apply.
17 (7)The proposed vacation will not land lock any parcel of property.
I8
The subject right-of-way is currently undeveloped, unused, and features topographic
19 challenges noted by DCD staff The only parcels that could benefit are those owned by the
Petitioners, Zimmerman and Rayonier, and all Petitioners'properties have alternate access
20 directly from Thorndyke Road. (Engineer's Report,page 3).
21
Compensation required for Class A and Class B rights-of-way.
22
16. Again, for reasons explained above, the County Engineer determined that the
23 segments of roadway at issue in this Petition are "Class A"right-of-way. (County Engineer's
Report, on page 2, finding no. 6). JCC 12.10.120 requires the Principal Petitioner to
24 compensate the County for all Class A and Class B vacated rights-of-way in compliance with
25
RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE PETITION FOR
")6 ROAD VACATION—PORTIONS OF MITCHELL GARY N.MCLEAN
STREET AND DUFFY AVENUE — HEARING EXAMINER
PROJECT FILE NO.97024001 FOR JEFFERSON COUNTY
Page 7 of 9
RCW 36.87.120. Accordingly,any resolution approving vacation of the subject right-of-way
shall not be effective until compensation is provided as described in the following findings.
2 17. JCC 12.10.120(1)provides: "Base Payment. The Principal Petitioner shall pay, with
3 respect to the vacation of either or both Class A and Class B roads or rights-of-way a sum
equal to one-half of the current fair market value (as of the date of the petition) of the area
4 so vacated if the county holds title through a dedication, or the full current fair market value
(as of the date of the petition) if the county acquired the subject rights-of-way other than by
5 dedication, e.g.,fee simple interest. "
6 18. The unrebutted County Engineer's Report explains that the County acquired the
7 subject rights-of-way through dedication.Therefore,if the vacation is approved,the Principal
Petitioner shall be required to compensate the County for one-half of the fair market value of
8 the property. Based on an appraisal commissioned by the principal-petitioner, Mr.
Zimmermann,the fair market value of the subject rights-of-way is$21,000. (See Engineer's
9 Report, and Exhibit F, appraisal).
10
19. JCC 12.10.120(2), imposes an "Additional Payment" requirement with respect to
I I vacation of a Class A road or rights-of-way,reading in relevant part as follows: "...in addition
to the base payment described above[in subsection(1)1, the principal petitioner(s)shall pay
12 to the county any and all other administrative costs incurred by the county in vacating the
road." The County Engineer's report explains that,to-date,the Principal Petitioner has paid
13 a total administrative fee of$1,605.78,which is the 2024 fee for vacating roads and includes
14 17 hours of staff time. Petitioner shall be liable for any staff time over 17 hours and any other
administrative costs incurred in processing the application. The Petitioner shall be required
15 to pay any fees and costs incurred which exceed the 2024 fee, whether or not the vacation is
ultimately approved.These would include,without limitation,the 2024 costs associated with
16 preparing for and conducting a hearing with the Hearing Examiner, preparation and issuance
17 of the Hearing Examiner's report, reviewing documents submitted by the Petitioner,
document recording fees, and other associated expenses incurred by the County.
18
20. Based on consideration of all evidence in the record, subject to the recommended
19 conditions of approval, and subject to payment of all compensation due, the Hearing
Examiner finds and concludes that the petition satisfies all approval criteria and should be
20 granted by the Board of County Commissioners.
21 V. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW.
22
1. The Hearing Examiner has jurisdiction and responsibility to consider issues presented
23 in this petition and issue this detailed report and recommendation to the Board of County
Commissioners.
24
25
RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE PETITION FOR
6 ROAD VACATION—PORTIONS OF MITCHELL GARY N.MCLEAN
STREET AND DUFFY AVENUE — NEARING EXAMINER
PROJECT FILE NO.97024001 FOR JEFFERSON COUNTY
Page 8 of 9
2. Based on findings provided above,the pending request to vacate portions of Mitchell
I Street and Duffy Avenue rights-of-way as described in the County Engineer's Report satisfies
2 all review criteria provided in JCC 12.10.110.
3 3. The proposed conditions of approval included in the Engineer's Report are supported
by a preponderance of evidence in the record,consistent with applicable law,and in the public
4 interest.
5 4. Any legal conclusions or other statements made in previous or following sections of
6 this document that are deemed conclusions of law are hereby adopted as such and are
incorporated herein by this reference.
7
VI. RECOMMENDATION.
8
Based upon all evidence in the record, and all findings and conclusions provided
9 above, the Hearing Examiner respectfully recommends that the Board of County
I Commissioners should formally vacate the following segments of County right-of-way,
subject to Conditions of Approval set forth below:
I1
Those portions of Mitchell Street and Duffy Avenue rights-of-way located west of
12 Thorndyke Road in the northwest quarter of the northwest quarter of Section 20,Township
27 North, Range 1 East, W.M., Jefferson County Washington, (see Exhibit A, vicinity and
13 parcel maps),both of which are 30-foot-wide rights-of-way that were dedicated in the Plat
of Goodfellow's Manhattan Beach Tracts, filed on July 8, 1908 and recorded in Volume 2
14 of Plats Page 122,records of Jefferson County. (See Exhibit B,highlighted plat illustration).
15 [*Note: The County Engineer should include a formal legal description of the vacated
rights-of-way as part of any Council Resolution].
16
VII. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL.
17
18 Before the requested road vacation can take effect,the Principal Petitioner shall:
19 A. Pay all required compensation owed to the County for the vacated right-of-way
and administrative process.
20
ISSUED this 11''Day of October,2024
21
22 /.
23 Gary N.McLean
24 Hearing Examiner
25
RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE PETITION FOR
26 ROAD VACATION—PORTIONS OF MITCHELL GARY N.MCLEAN
STREET AND DUFFY AVENUE — HEARING EXAMINER
PROJECT FILE NO.97024001 FOR JEFFERSON COUNTY
Page 9 of 9
tOCRIO
afrk,
f
t
xr ,.
alA
SakaA
4:1
1:4•2i graM Location of rights-of-way proposed for vacation
gam
taara
wico AT,
721172001 721173001 721173006 �f
721192001
Romer
//
721173002
S OO JB
9546 00201 J.p004)
721191001 as.
:p �9
9J. %0 a0
R-1Ynttif•. 4700aa7� ,,... unopened WOO Street
proposed for.vaOaton
954400102
954600101
721191001 hr o ed for vaeSts
EXHIBIT A - Vicinity map and parcel map showing rights-of-way proposed
for vacation
Department of Public Works
Regular Agenda
Page 1 of 2
Jefferson County
Board of Commissioners
Agenda Request
To: Board of Commissioners
Mark McCauley, County Administrator
From: Monte Reinders, P.E., Public Works Director
Agenda Date: October 28, 2024
Subject: A Resolution adopting Hearing Examiner report and recommendations,
and expressing Board's intent to vacate a portion of two platted County
Rights-of-Way known as Mitchell Street and Duffy Avenue, subject to
Petitioner meeting certain conditions
Statement of Issue:
In accordance with JCC 12.10.090, the Board is asked to consider the Hearing Examiner's
Report and recommendations (attached) pertaining to a petition to vacate only those portions
of unopened Mitchell Street and Duffy Avenue rights-of-way located north and west of the
existing (as of 2024) Thorndyke Road right-of-way in the northwest quarter of the northwest
quarter of Section 20, Township 27 North, Range 1 East, W.M. The subject rights-of-way are
each 30-feet wide as dedicated in the Plat of Goodfellow's Manhattan Beach Tracts, filed on
July 8, 1908 and recorded in Volume 2 of Plats Page 122, records of Jefferson County.' The
subject rights-of-way abut Tax Parcel 954-600-201 owned by Robert Zimmermann and Beth
Orling (Petitioner). As shown on the attached parcel map, other than Petitioner, all of the
property abutting the subject rights-of-way is owned by Rayonier, which joined in the Petition
to Vacate.
Analysis/Strategic Goals/Pro's Et Con's:
A public hearing on the road vacation petition was conducted before the Jefferson County
Hearing Examiner on July 26, 2024. Based upon the recommendations contained in the
County Engineer's report, as well as any comments received from other departments,
agencies, and individuals, the Hearing Examiner has recommended that the road vacation be
approved subject to Petitioner meeting the following condition:
• Pay all required compensation owed to the County for the vacated right-of-way and
administrative process.
Although the official public hearing was conducted by the Hearing Examiner, pursuant to JCC
12.10.130(1) the Board has the discretion to accept public testimony in support or in
opposition to the proposed vacation.
' Note, Thorndyke Road right-of-way is coincident with Manhattan Avenue right-of-way as platted in
the Goodfellow's Manhattan Beach Plat, EXCEPT that the existing Thorndyke right-of-way diverges to
the north from platted Manhattan Avenue near the westerly boundary of the plat (see parcel map
attached).
Department of Public Works
Regular Agenda
Page 2 of 2
Fiscal Impact/Cost Benefit Analysis:
If the Board approves the attached Resolution of Intent to Vacate, then in accordance with
JCC 12.10.120, Petitioner will pay compensation for administrative fees and expenses
incurred over-and-above staff hours included in the application fee plus $10,500 as
compensation for one-half of the assessed value of the subject rights of way.
Recommendation:
Department of Public Works recommends that the Board adopt the Hearing Examiner's
findings and conclusions and approve the vacation of the subject rights-of-way subject to
Petitioner meeting the Hearing Examiner's recommended approval condition, with the
clarification that compensation to be paid by Petitioner shall include the costs for preparing and
recording (by County staff) a Final Resolution approving the vacation of the subject rights-of-
way.
Public Works recommends that the Board sign the attached Intent to Vacate Resolution which
will commit the Board to adopting a final Resolution which will officially grant the petition to
vacate the subject rights-of-way upon verification that Petitioner has met all of the required
conditions within one-year. Failure to meet the conditions within that timeframe, or any
extension approved by the Board, will result in termination of the vacation process, in which
case Petitioner will remain liable for all administrative costs actually incurred by the County.
Department Contact:
Colette Kostelec, P.E., Engineer III/Right-of-Way Representative, 385-9218
Reviewed By:
,�2� /h 1� 4,2
Mark McCauley, ty Administrator Da