HomeMy WebLinkAboutHabitat Management Plan 968700107 & 112
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
203 Ludlow Bay Rd, Parcels 7 & 8
Port Ludlow, WA
Jefferson County Parcels
968700107 &
968700112
Habitat Management Plan
April 11 ,2008
6/19/2008
Prepared by:
Krista Graham
Senior Scientist
Mari Tiscareno
Associate Scientist
APPROVED by Jefferson County
as long as the project is being permitted
based on the buffer widths using the 1993
rating form.
I oasis
ENVIRONMENTAL
OASIS Environmental, Inc.
400 Winslow Way, Suite 200
Bainbridge Island, WA 98110
(206) 842-5398
IR D Ii"""'. "['....,.rr 'T YIT='l D
I ._-0(4 " ,~-.j il \\,' I A
" 1 \~ _;' '. \ / _ .,( ,
, l. \..11....4 ",../ Ld .ll. ~ lui)L
p'.;Jf; 1 ~ ~;rrj3.
f-'" ,\.1. J I....;;
JE~[r[](ln~l rnmrrv oro
I r ...lllJlm uiJU:~ II L'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Habitat Management Plan
Earl Miller
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1 Introduction.... .... .....,........ ........ ..... ...... ...... ............ ......... ............. ..... .... ............ ......... ......... 1
2 Project Location and Description ...................................................................................... 1
3 Critical Area Review Background ...... ....... ..... ........ ................................. ......... .................. 1
Permit Requirements for Critical Areas and Buffers ;........................................................2
4 Mitigation Goals ................................................................................................................ 2
Mitigation Measures.......................................................................................................... 2
Construction Impacts....... ......................... ..... ....... ..... .......................... ............ ......... ........ 3
5 Protection of Vegetative Buffers........................................................................................ 3
6 Description of On-Site Habitat and Species ...................................................................... 4
7 Effect/Impact Analysis.... ........ ................ ....... ............ .................... ........ ...... ......................4
8 Construction Schedule.......... ......... .... ........ ................. ...... ............... ...................... ...........4
9 Revegetation Plan............................................................................................................. 4
10 Non-Native/Invasive Species Control... ............. ........ ........ .................. ...................... ........ 6
11 Performance Standards..... .... ................. ................. ......... ............ ..... ........ ....................... 6
12 Maintenance Plan ............................................................................................................. 7
Contingency Plan.................................................................................:............................ 7
13 Monitoring Plan ...... .... ........ ................. ..................... ..................... ..... ........ ................. ...... 7
References...................................................................................................................... .............. 9
FIGURES
1. Site Plan
APPENDICES
A Planting Plan
B Photographs
April 11 , 2008
Prepared by OASIS Environmental, Inc
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Habitat Management Plan
Earl Miller
1 INTRODUCTION
This habitat management plan (HMP) has been prepared for Earl Miller to satisfy the conditional
use requirements for development on the subject property in Port Ludlow, Washington.
The purpose of the HMP is to provide a means for restoring or improving the wetland and
stream buffers that have been degraded in the past. Preparation of an HMP is one of the
conditions required by the Site Plan Approval Advance Qetermination (SPAAD) for a Single
Family Residence. This HMP describes other conditions relevant to wetland and stream buffers
in the SPAAD.
2 PROJECT LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION
The project is located on two parcels in a residential area in Port Ludlow, Washington.
Address:
General Location:
Jefferson County Parcels:
MLA Number:
Land Ownership:
203 Ludlow Bay Road, Port Ludlow, WA
Township 28N, Range 1E, Section 16
968700107 & 968700112
07-00397
Earl and Linda Miller
Both parcels are zoned MPR Single Family (according to Jefferson County website).
The project is to construct a single family residence on Lot 8 and garage/workshop on Lot 7.
3 CRITICAL AREA REVIEW BACKGROUND
A routine wetland determination was performed using available information about the site and
by conducti"ng an onsite inspection. Hydric soils are mapped in the northern portion of both lots.
However, based on the absence of wetland hydrology and hydrophytic vegetation, no wetlands
are present in this area of the subject property. There is an estuarine wetland located on the
adjacent parcel to the west. Jefferson County has not yet adopted the Department of Ecology's
revised Wetlands Rating System 1 and rates the adjacent wetland as a Category I based on the
1993 worksheet. Standard buffer for a Category I wetland is 150 feet.
Both parcels are primarily upland with a type 3 stream and man-made pond bisecting the two
lots (after lot line adjustment). There is an estuarine wetland located to the west of both parcels.
The buffer for this wetland does not serve as a high quality habitat or water quality buffer. The
buffer is primarily cultivated lawn grass with a chain link fence running the length of the both
parcel boundaries and a gravel driveway running along the fence.
The pond and stream buffer vegetation are primarily upland lawn grasses and ornamental (not
native) plants associated with the stream and pond edges.
1 The wetland scored 50 points on the Revised Western Washington Wetland Rating Form (Ecology, 2004). The
wetland was determined to be Category II based on Special Characteristics. The standard buffer for Jefferson County
for a Category II wetland is 100 feet.
April 11, 2008
1
Prepared by OASIS Environmental, Inc
I
Habitat Management Plan
Earl Miller
I
Permit Requirements for Critical Areas and Buffers
The conditions of SPAAD relevant to HMP are listed below, The numbers correspond with the
SPAAD dated October 4, 2007 from Jefferson County. These conditions will be satisfied by
actions in this plan as noted.
I
SPAAD Requirement Relevant HMP Section
#1 A reduced setback of 112.5 feet, measured perpendicularly Figure 1 shows buffer measurements.
form the wetland edge, shall be permanently maintained as a buffer. No
filling, grading, clearing, or other alteration of the wetland or its buffer is
allowed.
#2 Buffer perimeters shall be marked with signs at an interval or Section 5
one per parcel or every one hundred feet, whichever is less. Signs shall
contain the following statement: "Wetland & Buffer - Do Not Remove or
Alter Existing Vegetation."
#4 A permanent physical separation along the upland boundary of Section 5 and Appendix A. Condition of
the wetland buffer area shall be installed and permanently maintained. current wetland buffer illustrated in site
Such separation can include installing logs, trees, a hedgerow, or any photographs in Appendix B.
other prominent physical marking approved by the UDC Administrator.
#6 The identified Fish and Wildlife Habitat Area (Type 3 Stream), Figure 1 shows buffer measurements.
shall maintain a vegetative buffer setback of 100-feet. The setback shall
be measured horizontally from the Ordinary High Water Mark (OHWM)
to any proposed development.
#7 An additional setback of five (5) feet is required from the edge Figure 1 shows buffer measurements.
of the stream buffer area to any proposed development.
#8 A permanent physical separation along the boundary of the The planting plan in Appendix A shows the
stream buffer area shall be installed and permanently maintained. Such vegetation to be installed along the
separation can include installing logs, trees, a hedgerow, or any other boundary. Section 5 describes the signage
prominent physical marking approved by the UDC Administrator. to be used.
#9 Stream and wetland buffer perimeters shall be marked with Section 4, Construction Impacts
temporary signs at an interval of one per parcel and will be in place
prior and during construction activities. The signs shall state "Buffer -
Do Not Remove or Alter Existing Vegetation".
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
4 MITIGATION GOALS
I
The proposed development will require site preparation for the construction of a single-family
residence including a home, garage, driveway, and associated utilities. No clearing of trees is
proposed.
The wetland buffer will be 112.5 feet measured perpendicularly from the wetland edge. The
property has been professionally surveyed (Figure 1).
I
I
Mitigation Measures
Mitigation measures include the improvement of existing buffers through planting enhancement
as well as removal of invasive non-native species. The overall approach will be to limit light,
sound and human intrusions into the buffer, increase vegetation density, specifically by
increasing the canopy and shrub layer of the buffer adjacent to the proposed development and
limiting lawn areas. High quality, diverse vegetation and tree replanting provides multiple habitat
elements that will increase the potential for wildlife preservation. This mitigation will offset
impacts expected from the construction of the single-family residence, specifically, the plan will
provide mitigation as follows for the reduction of critical area buffers:
I
I
I
April 11 , 2008
2
Prepared by OASIS Environmental, Inc
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Habftat Management Pmn
Earl Miller
. Signs and a vegetative boundary will be placed between the stream buffer and the
proposed development. This will help detour prohibited activity from the stream buffers.
. Signs and a vegetative boundary will be placed between the wetland buffer and the
proposed development. This will help detour prohibited activity from the stream buffers.
. Minimize areas of lawn on-site. Using native vegetation within the landscaped areas of
yard will help maintain a high-functioning stream buffer.
. Wood chip/mulch paths may be installed within the buffer to provide access to the
stream. Any wood chip or mulch paths will be no wider than five (5) feet. No gravel will
be placed within the buffer.
. All streamside outdoor lighting will face downward to limit light impact.
Further mitigation of the new development after construction and improve habitat is planned by:
. Limiting the use of herbicides or pesticides particularly near the areas of berry, fruit, or
mast producing shrubs or trees. This will help ensure the availability of foraging for
wildlife. Even lawn fertilization can degrade nutrients for grazing animals.
. Limiting the use of insecticides. Insect populations are important on many ecological
levels, particularly as a food source for insectivores.
. Control pets. Domestic animals can serve as predators against wildlife or damage
critical plant species.
Construction Impacts
Temporary impacts may occur during site preparation and construction of the single-family
residence. Measures will be taken to minimize these impacts as well as controlling increased
sediment flow into the stream and stream buffer. Stream buffers will be fenced with temporary
construction mesh silt fencing between the area where the construction activity occurs and the
buffer. Fences will be made of durable protective barrier and will be highly visible. Silt fences
and plastic construction fences will be used to prevent encroachment to the stream and its
buffer by construction. Temporary fencing will be removed after the site work has been
completed and the site is fully stabilized, per county approval. Buffer perimeters shall be marked
with temporary signs at an interval of one per parcel or every one hundred feet, whichever is
less. Signs shall contain the following statement: "Wetland & Buffer - Do Not Remove or Alter
Existing Vegetation."
5 PROTECTION OF VEGETATIVE BUFFERS
The portion of the property constrained by the stream .and associated buffers will be retained
forever in its existing natural condition and any use of the area that will impair or interfere with
the environmental value will be prevented. With the exception of hazard tree removal and
enhancing the buffer area identified above, this area will be preserved and protected from
secondary impacts indicative of normal use of the property. Measures to ensure this level of
protection within the buffer area include the prohibited uses listed below:
· Construction of buildings within the buffer or stream area.
· Dumping or placing soil or other substance or material as landfill or dumping or placing
of trash, waste, or unsightly or offensive materials.
Apri/11, 2008
3
Prepared by OASIS Environmental, Inc
Habitat Management Plan
Earl Miller
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
· Removing or destroying trees, shrubs, or other vegetation, with the exception of danger
trees defined above or if the r~moved shrub or other vegetation is replaced with
ecologically similar vegetation.
· Excavating, dredging or removing loam, peat, gravel, soil, rock or other material
substances such as wood in such a manner to affect the surface.
· Activities detrimental to drainage, flood control, water conservation, erosion control, soil
conservation, or fish and wildlife habitat preservation.
· Buffer perimeters shall be marked with trees (Appendix A). Signs will be placed at an
interval of one per parcel or every one hundred feet, whichever is less. Signs shall
contain the following statement: "Wetland & Buffer - Do Not Remove or Alter Existing
Vegetation."
6 DESCRIPTION OF ON-SITE HABITAT AND SPECIES
This site is in a residential area, surrounded by rural residential development. There is very little
quality habitat in the existing buffers. The landscaping is primarily cultivated lawn grasses and
ornamental species. Photographs of the buffers on site are included in this HMP as Appendix B.
7 EFFECT/IMPACT ANALYSIS
Ecological effects of this project include increased impervious surface areas, and increased light
and sound intrusions.
The existing buffer areas are vegetated with cultivated lawn grasses and ornamental plants and
are poor habitat for wildlife. Revegetation and protection of buffer zones will improve habitat, as
well as water quality buffer function.
Enhancing buffers will offer species a natural buffer corridor protected from the increased
impacts. This will provide breeding, nesting, and foraging areas for wildlife within a developed
area.
8 CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE
Construction for this project is anticipated to start when the building permit is approved.
9 REVEGETATION PLAN
The planting plan is provided as Appendix A. The following is a list of the suggested species to
be used for replanting with the respective numbers of each species that should be planted. The
species chosen will depend on availability and personal preference. Other ecologically
equivalent native species may be substituted with prior approval from Jefferson County.
Jefferson County representatives will be contacted for approval verification prior to obtaining
and installing any plants other than those listed in this HMP.
Trees Number
Acer circinatum
Pinus contorta
Pseudotsuga menziesii
vine maple
shore pine
Douglas-fir
3-6
1-3
3-8
Apri/11, 2008
4
Prepared by OASIS Environmental, Inc
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Habftat Management Pmn
Earl Miller
Shrubs
Comus stolonifera red-osier dogwood 2-4
Philadelphus lewisii mock orange 2-4
Rosa gymf10carpa wood rose 4-6
The planting recommendations are as follows: 11-18 trees and 8-14 shrubs will be planted
approximately along the stream and along the western property boundary and wetland buffer.
Planting between October 15th and March 15th will increase success rates. Periodic irrigation
during extended dry periods may be necessary during the first few years. Bark chip mulch
should be placed around the base of each plant to improve moisture retention and to reduce
competition from weedy species. Each plant should be flagged and numbered for monitoring
purposes.
The ecological function of each plant to be used for this HMP is described in this section.
Plant Species
(Scientific Name)
Acer circinatum
Plant Species
(Common Name)
vine maple
Pinus contorta
shore pine
Pseudotsuga
menziesii
Douglas-fir
Comus stolon if era
red-osier dogwood
Wildlife & Habitat Benefits
Vine maple has soil-binding characteristics, and
aids in erosion prevention. Various bird species
eat vine maple seeds, including grosbeaks,
woodpeckers, nuthatches, finches, quail and
grouse. Deer, mountain beavers and beavers
eat twigs and wood. Brown tissue and
polyphemus moth larvae use the plant. Bees
also use vine maple as a nectar source.
Seed-eating birds eat the seeds. Pine beetles
and other insects are gleaned from the branches
and cones by bushtits, kinglets, chickadees and
woodpeckers. Pine white butterfly larvae use the
, foliage and many songbirds nest in pines.
A variety of birds eat the seeds including:
grouse, crossbills and siskins. Small mammals
like squirrels and chipmunks also eat the seeds.
Insects are gleaned from the trunk, branches
and twigs by a variety of birds, including:
chickadees, nuthatches, brown creepers, and
woodpeckers. Beaver, porcupine, deer and elk
browse the needles and twigs. Pine white
butterfly larvae, silver-spotted tiger moth larvae
and many other moths eat the foliage. Flying
squirrels and cavity-nesting birds roost and nest
in mature trunks.
Various bird species eat the dogwood berries,
including: vireos, warblers, kingbirds, robins,
flickers, flycatchers, wood ducks, grouse, band-
tailed pigeons and quail. Bear, foxes, skunks
and chipmunks also eat dogwood berries.
Porcupines eat the wood. Deer, elk and rabbits
April 11 , 2008
Prepared by OASIS Environmental, Inc
5
Habitat Managemen~ Plan
Earl Miller
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Plant Species
(Scientific Name)
Plant Species
(Common Name)
Wildlife & Habitat Benefits
Philadelphus lewisii
mock orange
browse the twigs. Beavers and muskrats use
dogwood twigs in habitat construction. Orange
sulphur and other adult butterflies use the
nectar. Spring azure and other butterfly larvae
use dogwood leaves.
Mock orange provides good erosion-control.
Various bird species eat the seeds, including
catbirds, grosbeaks, juncos, thrushes, bluebirds, .
chickadees, flickers, finches, quail and grouse.
Deer and elk browse the shrub. Swallowtail,
common wood nymph and other butterflies use
the nectar of the mock orange.
A variety of birds eat the hips, including grouse,
bluebirds, juncos, grosbeaks, quail, pheasants
and thrushes. The seeds are used as a source
of grit by birds. Chipmunks, rabbits, hares,
porcupines, coyotes, deer elk and bear also eat
the hips. Thickets provide important coverage
for ground-dwelling birds and small mammals.
Mourning cloak butterfly larvae eat the leaves.
Leaf-cutter bees use the leaves for building
material. Aphids eat the young shoots and, in
turn, provide food for many predators, including
songbirds and ladybugs.
Rosa gymnocarpa
wood rose
10 NON-NA TIVE/INV ASIVE SPECIES CONTROL
There are invasive plants already present on-site. Given the opportunity, Scotch broom, reed
canarygrass and Himalayan blackberry could dominate the planting area and may reduce the
success rate of the native species. Periodic hand cutting or pulling (recommend 2 to 3 times
yearly) of invasive weeds from the planting area may be necessary. Weed cloth under the
mulch may improve the survival of planted trees and shrubs.
11 PERFORMANCE STANDARDS
The primary goals of the mitigation plan are to enhance the existing stream buffer, preserve
hydrology and water quality to the stream, and enhance the native plant community with
increased diversity. These goals will be met by utilizing best management practices during the
construction period. This is done so that minimal impacts occur in the critical areas during the
planting to help increase success rate for healthy, vigorous vegetation. Ultimately, by the third
year following implementation of the plantings, the enhanced stream buffer should meet these
performance standards.
1. One hundred percent survival of planted trees and shrubs at the end of the first year.
2. Minimum of eighty percent average cover of native trees and shrubs in the planted areas by
the end of the three monitoring period.
April 11 , 2008
6
Prepared by OASIS Environmental, Inc
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
HabftatManagementP~n
Earl Miller
3. Eighty percent survival of planted trees and shrubs at the end of the third year of the
monitoring period. Survival rate is established as a goal and may be adjusted where natural
regeneration, growth, and colonization has resulted in minimum plant cover, as defined
above.
4. Non-native invasive plants will not make up more than ten percent cover in any growing
season.
12 MAINTENANCE PLAN
The primary goals of the planting plan proposed by the HMP are to enhance buffers by
increasing plant community diversity and habitat complexity while preserving water quality.
The maintenance plan will ensure that the installed plants survive and meet the performance
standards within the three to five year monitoring period. Maintenance includes watering as
needed during the dry season. If the plants are installed during the dry season of the installation
year, a temporary irrigation system may be necessary.
Removal of all invasive and noxious vegetation will be conducted yearly. All removal of
vegetation is to be conducted by hand without the use of pesticides or chemicals. All debris will
be removed from the site and disposed of in an approved landfill. Volunteer native shrub and
tree species will not be removed and will be included as part of the enhancement plan.
Contingency Plan
Contingency actions to the implemented in the case of plant mortality include the following:
. Install additional plants
. Replace missing or dead plants
· Install plants more suited to site conditions
. Remove invasive species
. Amend soils
. Irrigate
. Fence from deer
13 MONITORING PLAN
The goal of the monitoring plan is to determine if the site is meeting the prescribed performance
standards.
Within 30 days of plant installation, an as-built will be submitted to Jefferson County Department
of Community Development.
The following monitoring actions and schedules will be implemented to test each performance
standard described above.
1. All specimens (planted and volunteer) will be examined and counted in year 1.
2. The average cover of native trees and shrubs in the revegetation area will be measured in
year 3.
3. All specimens (planted and volunteer) will be examined and counted in year 3.
Apri/11, 2008
7
Prepared by OASIS Environmental, Inc
Habitat Management Plan
Earl Miller
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
4. In the revegetation area, percent aerial cover of invasive species will be measured in year 1,
2 and 3.
Monitoring will be conducted annually for three years. Monitoring will take place in either the late
summer or early fall (between August 1 and September 30). Each year, a monitoring report will
be prepared and submitted to Jefferson County by October 31. This annual report will state
whether or not the survival rates specified in this HMP have been met or if contingency
measures need to be implemented.
April 11 , 2008
8
Prepared by OASIS Environmental, Inc
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
HabftatManagementP~n
Earl Miller
REFERENCES
King County Department of Development and Environmental Services. 2007. Critical Areas
Restoration and Enhancement in King County: Understanding the Process & Technical
Assistance in Preparing a Plan. http://www.metrokc.Qov/ddes/forms/IQ-Quide-rest.pdf
Link, Russell. Landscaping for Wildlife in the Pacific Northwest. University of Washington Press,
1999.
Pierce College Arboretum. "Sword fern Polystichum munitum."
http://www.pierce.ctc.edu/biology/arboretum/LakeWaughopSysKey/Swordfern.html
Sound Native Plants. Project Planning and Restoration Guidance Information Sheets.
www.soundnativeplants.com
Washington State Department of Ecology, 2004. Wetland Rating System for Western
Washington, Revised. Ecology Publication # 04-06-025
April 11 , 2008
9
Prepared by OASIS Environmental, Inc
----~--------------
)> 0
""C
""C
:;0
0 H.LHON
?< N
en u.
0 01
)> 0 ~~t11 ni
r-
m . ,~,.. l
i'
Z
"T1
m
m -"
-I 0
0
~
--I -" -"
::u -" 0
m I\.) CJ1
m CJ1 'T1
'T1 --I
--I en
I\.) --I
CJ1 ::u
'::R. m
0
::u )>
m s:
0 OJ
C C
() 'T1
m 'T1
0 m
~ ::u
m
--I
r
)>
Z
0
OJ
C
'T1
'T1
m \
::u
I
I \
.
. \
. .
I "I
~ CJ1
0
m 'T1
--I --I
r
)> 0
z :c
0 ~
s:
en
m
--I
OJ
)>
()
^
I
1/
.1; I~
J. I '~
I" I
I I I
I I
I
/
/
/
I
-1
'1
i
~
iiI
!'"
"
I
t
I
i I
''/
I'
I
I
I
~
tf
""
J
5
PI
I'.
B.'
~
, ,
\
.
,
.
,
.
,
0>"
~o
x;;o
C11()
"2:I:
.
I\.)
0
w
r-
C
Qi-o 0 "T1
c;l ::E ~ r
0 -
~ ::::lC"l ~ G)
CJl (1)
)> ::r - to c:
-'Z :!<
0 '00
Cil ~. ::0
III 00<.0 ;;0 m
(C Zo> 0
CD - (X) )>
~lXl./>. C"tlC r ....a.
1\J~0 ;;O-...J .0
8-0 ~~~ 0 OlO
~z:E fjj ::::l0 "U en
colXl_ :e~~ ...... co...... 0
./>.;;oz ~ (1)0 ;;0 -
I\J-C/l ~z;- ......-...J -I
",Or ~ -l
(,)(;)0 s::~? mS20 r- m
~~:E w - <.0 C
~~ :...~W w 000> 0 "tI
. c.n~ w (1)00 r-
z'< -...IN III C"l-...J 0 r-
om II:) 0 =0 .~ )>
1:)1:) ..., 00
. C/l ~co CD ::::l......
~~ C/l ............ ~ Z
(0-1 o>~
com <.0
..... I\J
.....0 00
0::' w
0)
en
,
., \
." \
~ ..... \
m ".....
-I '\.
~ \ ......~.-
() '"
^ ,;l':
, .lri/
f'l,
',{I','
/It;K
,\:~} ,
."
. r.,;,
,".,,'
'J
~
.,
..
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
APPENDIX A
PLANTING PLAN
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
)>
"'tI
"'tI
:;:0
o
?<
en
o
)>
r-
m
z
."
m
m
-t
o
01
o
MoL1l:IION
N
.
\'il...~, ",.\'1..''''
, ' . .',. - - ':".'(.
\ ..
,,'~
"..~
.~
~
n.{~~d';
Uv t~J1'1
'Ii
.~
A,
~1
L..~.."'.....f'IJ
I
"I I
,,~
I
l
,
I
I "
j
,
I
I
......
o
o
*-_e
-u:E'
mm
::0-1
->
S::z
~O
mOJ
::Oc
en"TI
-"TI
G'lm
z::o
:5
Z
m
s:::
:x>
"U
r
m
en
I
o
;0
m
"U
Z
m
o
o
c
G)
r
:x>
en
T1
;0
;0
m
o
6
en
m
;0
o
o
G)
:E
o
o
o
I
I
1,:_
-1
!~
j I
!~
~ I
", I I
HJ :
~ I r~
I: I
I .
I I,.
: 1 ,
~
_.'
,J
I
o .
m
~
en
:::!
Z
G)
--I
;0
m
m
s:::
o
C)
^
o
~
Z
G)
m
:E
o
o
o
;0
o
en
m
'"
~
-,
..
~
J
1'1
r.
~*'
~
,.~~.
-u:E
mm
::0-1
->
S::z
~o
mOJ
::Oc
en"TI
-"TI
G'lm
z::o
0'1 ..... .....
0 ..... 0
T1 ~ 0'1
--I 0'1 T1
0 T1 --I
I --I en
:E ~ --I
0'1 ;0
s::: ?fl. m
en ;0 :x>
m m s:::
--I 0 III
III C C
:x> C) T1
C) m T1
^ 0 m (l)-u
:E ;0 -1>:0
><::0
m t1I()
--I I\?:I:
r
:x>
Z
0
III
C
T1
T1
m
;0
-u:E
mm
::0-1
->
S::z
~o
mOJ
::Oc
en"TI
-"TI
G'lm
z::o
I\J )>
0
w "lJ
r
C "lJ
o'''U 0 m
r
c;l ::E ~ 0 Z
!if ::J () :E
cn(1) C
)> -:;r- to
-'Z -
0 "'00 ~ >< '"-""~----.~-~
CD ~.
Dl 0:><0 ;;0 )> --""',,-, ""'"
<C Zo> 0 ~"~-.....,.....
CD . 0:> )> . .
~OJ-l>- C"tlC
N~o r ;O""-J .0
al-o ~;;tI~ 0 010 "'tJ
~z:E :e~~ fi) ::JO "'0
co OJ_ ...... co"'" 0 r-
-l>-::OZ (1)0
N-en Qo ;;0 )>
u,Or ~Z;- 00 .....""-J -i
wG'lo 3:~? mS20 r Z
~~:E w . <0 C -I
~~ :"'.a::o.w i:.u en 0> 0
. U1~ w (1) 0:> r -
z'< .......~ Dl n.""-J 0 Z
'0 0 -.0 .:E
om 00 CD 00 Q
- en ~co ::J.....
~~ en ....."'" ~
(0-1 o>~ "'tJ
com CD r-
.....N
.....0 00 )>
09 w
0> Z
01
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
203 Ludlow Bay Road, Port Ludlow, WA
Habitat Management Plan, Appendix B
Earl Miller
1. Northern section of lot 7, looking north toward Port Ludlow Harbor.
oasis I EN V I RON MEN T" l
2. Northern section of lot 7, looking east to lot 8.
1
203 Ludlow Bay Road, Port Ludlow, WA
Habitat Management Plan, Appendix B
Earl Miller
3. Northern section of lot 7, looking south.
oasis I E N V I RON MEN T A I
4. Northern section of lot 7, looking southwest.
2
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
203 Ludlow Bay Road, Port Ludlow, WA
Habitat Management Plan, Appendix B Earl Miller r
"
5. Estuary adjacent to and west of lot 7, from lot 7 looking northwest.
6. Estuary adjacent to and west of lot 7, from lot 7 looking west.
oasis I ENVIRONMENTAL . 3
203 Ludlow Bay Road, Port Ludlow, WA
Habitat Management Plan, Appendix B
Earl Miller
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
7. Culvert draining man-made pond into estuary west of lot 7.
oasis I E N V I RON MEN TAL
8. Man-made pond on lot 7, looking northeast.
4
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
203Ludlow Bay Road, Port LudlOW, WA
,Habitat Management Plan, Appendix B
Earl Miller
9. Man-made pond on lot 7, looking east.
oasis I E N V I RON MEN TAL
10. Culvert in man-made pond; drains to estuary.
5
203 Ludlow Bay Road, Port Ludlow, WA
Habitat Management Plan, Appendix B
Earl Miller
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
11. Stream on lot 8 flowing towards man-made pond.
12. Gravel road on western edge oflot 7, looking north.
oasis I E N V I RON MEN TAL
6
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
203 Ludlow Bay Road, Port Ludlow, WA
Habitat Management Plan, Appendix B
Earl Miller
13. Gravel road on western edge of lot 7, looking south.
oasis I E N V I RON MEN T" I
14. Southern portion of lot 8, looking east.
7
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
203 Ludlow Bay Road, Port Ludlow, WA
Habitat Management Plan, Appendix B Earl Miller
. 15. Gravel drive, southern section of lots, looking south toward homes.
16. From homes, looking north toward Port Ludlow harbor.
oasis I E N V I RON MEN TAL 8
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
203 Ludlow Bay Road, Port Ludlow, WA
Habitat Management Plan, Appendix B
Earl Miller
17. On southern section of lot 8, looking north across culverted stream.
18. From Ludlow Bay Road, culvert draining stream onto property adjacent to lot 8.
oasis I ENVIRONMENTAL , 9