HomeMy WebLinkAboutWetland Mitigation 501025008
.
.
Loggy Soil and Wetland Consulting
W. David Loggy. CPSS and Wetland Specialist
P. O. Box 2347. Port Angeles. WA 98362
Phone:36045 7 -392o-Fax: 360457-0131
Email: wdploggy@olypen.com
Web Page: Olypen.com/wdploggy
OCT -. 2 2008
,I,
ARCPACIi
~~
Certified
L
c:~), ..;:,
---""~"",-~'--",<-"--'-"--,;
Specializing in:
Soil Mapping and CIassiflcation
Soil Investigations- Soil Site Analysis
Wetland Mapping, Delineation and Restoration
Soil Redox Potential Monitoring for Hydric Soil Detennination
JEFFEHSO;'l ;_:\"t_)~~1-Y
DE? r Uf CC);\':/wiUi fY Uf,\'tLOP\:Ei) r
SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT OF JURISDICTIONAL
LAND AREAS AND SITE PLAN
INFORMATION FOR PARCEL 501025008
CONDUCTED ON PROPERTY
Located in a portion of
Section 02 T.25N, R.1W, W.M.,
Jefferson County, Washington
Parcel Number:
501025008
Title Owner:
Thomas & Carrie Bashaw
C&T Bashaw Living Trust
P.O. Box 755514
Honolulu, m 96836-0514
Study Requested By:
Thomas and Carrie Bashaw
Proposed Land Action:
Development of Single-Family Dwelling
Study Name:
Bashaw 501025008
Regulatory Agency
Jefferson County
Department of Community Development
Reference For Study:
Jefferson County Code
Article VI-I Revised 8/06
Study Conducted By:
Loggy Soil and Wetland Consulting
w. David Loggy, CPSS
P.O. Box 2347
Port Angeles, W A 98362-0303
(360) 457-3920
September 29, 2008
I, '1
,
SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT OF JURISDICTIONAL LAND AREAS
AND SITE PLAN INFORMATION FOR PARCEL 501025008
COVERING
WETLAND BUFFER, BUFFER WIDTH AVERAGING, BALDEABLE SHORELINE AREA,
SHORELAND AREA AND RECOMMENDED MITIGATION AREAS
CONSULTING COMPANY:
Loggy Soil and Wetland Consulting
TYPE OF CRITICAL AREA INVESTIGATION:
Soils
Wetlands
Aquatic & Wildlife Conservation area
D
~
D
r-
I
I
j !
..dJ'
co
c::.
C)
C'...J
LAND OWNER
Thomas & Carrie Bashaw
C&T Bashaw Living Trust
P.O. Box 755514
Honolulu, HI 96836-0514
t:'J
I
I-
U
o
;~~5i
~,U'":
i'~:- .::;
!:!~ ()
"-
,...."
REOUSTING STUDY:
Thomas & Carrie Bashaw
'-'
':'l.
w
Q
PROPOSED PROJECT:
Development of single-family-residence
TAX PARCEL NUMBER(S):
501025008
SITE LOCATION:
LEGAL LOCATION:
Section 2, Township 25 North, Range 1 West,
W.M., Jefferson County, Washington
SITE ADDRESS:
85 Hazel Point CT, Quilcene, W A 98376
ROAD ROUTE INSTRUCTIONS
From State Route 104 take Center Road
south towards Quilcene. From Center Road take
Dabob Road south to Coyle Road. Take Coyle
Road south to Hazel Point Road and go east on
Hazel Point Road. 85 Hazel Point CT is on the
right side of Hazel Point Road. Hazel Point
Road becomes a gravel road before reaching 85
Hazel Point CT. The turn off is mark by a large
sign saying Hazel Point CT and there is a green
bar gate across the access road to the property.
USE CODE:
1900 - Cabins, Vacation Homes
SIZE OF PARCEL
5.89 acres -
FIELD WORK PERIOD
Buffer established February and March 2008
Bashaw 501025008
LSWC September 29, 2008
.,. ','
PART I
WETLAND
1.1 WETLAND DETERMINATION
The proposed development of Parcel 501025008 is vested under Jefferson County Code (JCe)
Title 18 Chapter 18.15 Article VI-I. Wetlands (Revised 8/06). The wetland on the Parcel was classified
as a Category II Wetland and documentation on the wetland area study dated March 13,2008 was filed
with Jefferson County. The report may be reviewed at the Jefferson County Department of Community
Development Office. Drawing 1 in the Appendix A of this report shows the wetland area, size and
habitats found within the wetland boundary.
1.2 ESTABLISHMENT OF STANDARD REQUIRED BUFFER WIDTH
The Category II Wetland on this parcel requires a 100 foot buffer. On May 28,2008 the wetland
buffer and existing development sites (road and excavated building site within 230 feet of the wetland
edge) were established with relation to the wetland. The outer edge of the wetland buffer was determined
by establishing six perpendicular 100 foot horizontal transects from 6 wetland station along the western
boundary of the wetland. A hand compass, fiberglass measuring tape and a clinometer were used to
establish the 6 transects. Transects locations can be viewed in Drawing 2 in the Appendix as well as the
location ofthe buffer. Transects lengths were established using slope distances and then the slope
distances were corrected to establish horizontal distance depending on the steepness of the slopes. The
slope gradients of the buffer ranges from 0 to 70 percent depending on the location of each transect. The
elevation change from the edge of the wetland to the back of the buffer ranges from 21 to 40 feet. Cross
section profiles of each transect can be viewed in Drawing 3 in the Appendix.
The buffer boundary is marked with wood latch with orange flagging with the following
statement written on them: "Wetland & Buffer- Do Not Remove or Alter Existing Native Vegetation" as
required under Jefferson County Code (lCe) 18.15.340 (4) (b). The size of the established regulated
buffer onthe parcel is 27,927.07 square feet (0.64 acres).
An excavated building site is present on the parcel as presented in Drawing 2 of the Appendix.
The building site was developed, in approximately 1997, with relation to an old wetland delineation
system done on October 5, 1993. The expiration ofthe SPAAD in 2007 required a new wetland
delineation and new buffer. While the building site was not situated in the buffer under the old Category
III Wetland delineation and 50 foot buffer, 3,533.66 square feet or 54.4 percent of the building site is now
located in the new established required regulated buffer for the Category II Wetland. The 3,533.66 ft2 is
12.7 percent of the total buffer area. The site of the original excavated building site and road are shown in
Drawing 2 (Appendix) in relation to the jurisdictional wetland buffer area and identified in the slope
profiles in Drawing 3 in the Appendix.
The following table gives the size of the buffer and building site
TABLE 1
BUFFER AND BUILDING SITE SIZE AND PERCENTAGES
Site Squire Feet Acres % of Buffer
Size of Buffer 27,927.07 0.64
Ori,ginal Building Site 6,482.56 0.15
Original Buildin,g Site in Buffer 3,533.66 0.08 12.6
Original Building Site out of Buffer 2,927.07 0.07
Size of Abandon Road in Buffer 1,385.74 0.03 0.05
Bashaw 501025008
2
LSWC September 29,2008
\' ',t
PART II
AVERAGING BUFFER WIDTHS
2.0 PROPOSED WETLAND BUFFER AVERAGING
Thomas & Carrie Bashaw still want to use the existing excavated building site for the building of
their single-family dwelling. The total use ofthe excavated site is no longer available because 54.5
percent of building site is now within the required buffer, unless the buffer is adjusted through buffer
width averaging as allowed under lCC 18.15.340(8).
It is proposed to maintain most of the original excavated building site through buffer width
averaging. The area proposed for modifying the regulated 100 foot wide buffer is shown in Drawing 4 in
the Appendix. Modifying the original buffer for buffer width averaging will include adjusting the buffer
width associated with the excavated building site by 2,994.78 square feet (0.07 acres) and 390.72 square
feet (0.01 acres) of the buffer along the northwest edge ofthe building site. The total buffer area to be
modified to obtain the buffer width averaging is 3,385.50 square feet (0.08 acres). The area represents
12% of original regulated buffer area. The adjusted buffer averaged areas will be replaced with two
expanded areas to the buffer; one on the northwest edge of the buffer (1,927.51 square feet) and the other
along the southwest comer of the buffer (2,261.27 square feet). The combined area for the two buffer
expansions is 4,188.78 square feet (0.10 acres). The expanded buffer area along the southwest comer of
the original buffer was slightly increased to tie it into one of the areas proposed for mitigation as
described under Part V of the report. The buffer average areas are marked with wood lath and are marked
as the buffer width averaged boundary.
2.1 DEMONSTRATING REQUIREMENTS FOR AVERAGING BUFFER WIDTHS
The following demonstrates the consistency for averaging buffer widths as required in lCC 18.15.334 (8),
Revised 8/06).
2.1 (a) Width averaging will not adversely impact the wetland functional values.
The wetland and the associated functional values of habitat, water quality and hydrology are the
result of a spit of convergent sand and gravel extending out into Hood Canal. "The spit shoreline feature
is an accreationary shoreline feature growing outward from deposition of sand and gravel being
transported via wave action from the eroding bluff both west and north of the subject property n. 1 The
wetland functional values are changed, maintained and influenced more by the development of the spit than
the abutting uplands along the wetland
The wetland is a very infrequently flooded site that is 1.1 acres in size. The wetland has a low
interspersion of wetland classes consisting of a salt tolerant emergent plant cover abutting a narrow strip
of freshwater shrub wetland. The wetland has a low diversity of salt tolerant plants with higher plant and
structural diversity occurring in the narrow shrub wetland strip (Drawing 1). The one special habitat
feature of the wetland includes a large percentage of the wetland area being covered with medium to large
drift wood and logs.
Although, the wetland is an enclosed depressional type wetland it has limited function to improve water
quality and any water reaching the wetland is the infrequently flooding by extreme high tides under severe
storm conditions. It has no outlet channel and less than 1/4 of the wetland area has seasonally ponded
water. The wetland collects very little if any runoff so does not function to reduce flooding and stream
degradation.
1 STRATUM GROUP, Engineering Geology Reconnaissance, Shoreline Bluff, Lot 8, Hazel Point Large Lot Subdivision.
Government Lot 1, Section 2, Township 25 N, Range 1 W, Jefferson County, Washington, May 28, 2002.
Bashaw 501025008
3
LSWC September 29,2008
'," ',I,
To understand whether buffer width averaging will or will not adversely impact the wetland
functional values it is necessary to define the functional values. Each functional value is described below
for the Category II Wetland
2.1 (a) i Habitat
The buffer width averaging will have no adverse impact on the habitat of the wetland with a
proper storm water and erosion control plan for the development site. The critical portion of the buffer is
the steep vegetated slope between the building site and the edge of the wetland The septic field site is
planned on the western portion of the parcel. There are two dwellings directly on the shore near the south
end of the wetland and Two on the shore on the north side of the wetland. The dwelling for this lot will sit
back at least 80 feet from the nearest area of shore and edge of the wetland None of the building site will
encroach onto the step sloped buffer area.
The wetland and associated shore serves as forage areas for eagles nesting areas to the south of
the parcel. Three eagle nest trees (HALE 4, 5 & 6) are listed and identified as being within one half mile of
the parcel; two of them (HALE 4 & 6) being within 250 feet of the shoreline. The three eagle nest trees are
identified as the Hazel Point #706 Eagle Territory. Under present day Bald Eagle management
requirements, the part of the parcel 250 feet wide from the shoreline is identified as shoreline management
zone since two of the eagle nest trees are within 250 of the shoreline and the parcel is within the shoreland
eagle management area for the nest. Eagle shoreline management plan is discussed in Part III of the
report.
2.1 (a) ii Water Quality
Buffer averaging will not adversely impact water quality in the wetland A drainage ditch that is
presently discharging runoff onto the steep slope on the north end is resulting in a minor area of sediment
being deposited into the wetland The sediment will be minimized or eliminated when the discharge and
erosion caused by the drainage ditch is corrected under the erosion control plan requiredfor the
development. There are no other streams or channels that can supply runoff and associated sediment from
the averaged buffer area.
2.1 (a) iii Hydrology
The building site has been in place for several years and appears to have no adverse impact on the
wetland function. The steep slope between the building site and the wetland is completely vegetated with
dense forest of Douglas fir, red cedar and bigleaf maple with a dense shrub understory cover. The old
abandon road is heavily vegetated with planted grasses and there is no evidence of erosion on this section
of steep slope below the building site.
2.1 (b) The total area contained within the wetland buffer after averaging is not less than
the contained within the standard buffer prior to averaging.
The total area contained within the regulated 100 foot buffer is 27,933.23 square feet (0.64 acres) as
shown in Drawing 2. The total area contained within the average buffer is 28,738.54 square feet (0.66
acres). The difference of 805.31 square feet of additional averages buffer allows for the expanded buffer
width on the south end to be tied to a proposed mitigation enhancement area (PART V) next to the
southwest side of the excavated building site (Drawing 4).
2.1 (c) The standard buffer width has not been reduced by more than 25 percent. lOrd. 8-
06 ~1].
Bashaw 501025008
4
LSWC September 29,2008
1--
c;;
o
The buffer averaging adjustment was designed to retain as much of the original building site, within
the requirements of JCC 18.15.340(8), without extending the averaged buffer boundary beyond the east
edge of the building site onto the steep slopes above the wetland. The maximum distance the bzifJer is
adjusted for buffer averaging is 25 feet from the original buffer line. The 25 foot adjustment occurs from
Buffer Station B5 thru B8 (Drawing 4).
PARTID
BALD EAGLE MANAGEMENT PLAN
The parcel is within an area that meets the requirement and definition of a Bald Eagle
Shoreline Zone, meaning that it is within 1.2 mile of a nest that is within 250 feet of the shoreline.
The parcel will require a Bald Eagle Management Plan (BEMP). This is a habitat protection
agreement between Washington State Department ofFish and Wildlife (WDFW) and the
landowner ensuring minimal impact on bald eagles and reasonable land use for the owner.
Because the parcel appears to be within the 1/2 mile bald eagle shoreline Zone it is eligible for a
Standard I-Page WDFW BEMP. The report will be prepared Shelly Ament of WDFW. Until the
BEMP is completed the location of the boundary for the 250 wide management zone will not be
known.
PART VI
ORDINARY HIGH WATER MARK
AND
JURISDICTIONAL SHORELAND BOUNDARY, DESIGNATIONS AND SETBACKS
The shoreline abutting the east side of the parcel is designated as shorelines of state-wide
significance. The shoreline in the area of the project is environmentally designated conservancy.
The Ordinary High Water Mark (OHWM) is indicated on Drawing 5 (Site Plan). A conservancy
shoreline designation allows low density residential use provided the activity does not
significantly degrade or deplete resources and respect limiting environmental condition. The
planned site for the residential structure and associated appurtenants are well beyond the
shoreline OHWM. The shore land area is horizontally 200 feet from the OHWM as indicated on
Drawing 5. The boundary for the shoreland area was expanded to include the wetland when the
200 foot shore land boundary fell within the wetland boundary. When the boundary was within
the wetland boundary, the shoreland boundary was moved out to the western edge of the wetland
boundary so that the wetland was included in the shore land area. The primary and reserved
sewage filter field sites are located approximately 545+ horizontal feet from the jurisdictional
shoreland area boundary.
None of the proposed building site occurs within the shorelandjurisdictional area. Since
the building site is outside the shore land jurisdictional area, Critical Area Ordinances will be
applied and wetland buffer width averaging will be applied to the wetland buffer area as defined
in the first Part II of this document.
Bashaw 501025008
5
LSWC September 29,2008
,," ,,"
PART V
BUFFER AREA MITGATION
Buffer width averaging as set forth in Article VI-I 18.15.340 is feasible and as such does
not require development of a buffer enhancement plan using native vegetation. Although, an
enhancement plan for the wetland buffer is not required it is recommended that the following
sites be enhanced through native vegetation planting to benefit future wildlife in the area and the
jurisdictional wetland buffer.
· Recommend that Area A shown in Drawing 4 be replanted with 2 year old nursery stock
Pseudotsuga menziesii (Douglas fir) on 20 foot spacing. Area A ties into the expanded
buffer area for buffer averaging.
· Recommend that Area B which an old abandon road be planted with 2 year old nursery
stock Pseudotsuga menziesii (Douglas fir) on 20 foot spacing. The abandon road is now
planted in grass and planting Douglas fIr will enhance the buffer zone between the
wetland and the building site. Since this is an old road area some soil preparation may be
required for the seedlings. A foot trail can be placed in this area to provide access to the
wetland and shoreline. The abandon road cannot be driven on from the east edge of the
building site and the residence to the south.
· Recommend that Area C be planted to a mixture of shrubs which can be a mixture of any
of the following three species:
o Symphoricarpos albus (common snowberry)
o Rubus parviflorus (thimbleberry)
o Mahonia [Berberis] aquifolium (Tall Oregon grape)
o Rosa pisocarpa (peafruit rose)
o Rubus leucodermis (black cap raspberry).
PART VI
18.15.400 Wetland Delineation Report
Qualification of Preparer are presented in Appendix B.
OCT - 2 2008
Bashaw 501025008
6
LSWC September 29, 2008
'" ',"
APPENDIX A
DRAWING OF WETLAND SITE
DRAWING 1 - CATEGORY 2 WETLAND AREA
_ . _ _ . _ estimated north property line
-'-- ~
----
----
----
edge of wetland and steep upland slope ~
estimated south property line / - - -
LEGEND
CD Shrub wetland Habitat
o Organic Soil & Emergent Habitat
@ Muckv Peat Sand Soil Emergent Habitat
+ CofTl)SSS Stations
w1, 2300 = Wetland and Habitat Boundary Stations
130h
140h
.'
<J-- Top Shoreline Sandbar
ACRES
TOTAL WETLAND ON PROPERTY
0.08
0.35
0.67
1.10
0.08
0.32
0.46
0.86
SCALE: 1- =40' DRAWN BY WETLAND PROPERTY OWNER -- ~ ~ ~
0' 20' 40' W. David Loggy CRITICAL AREA DRAWING OR CUENT
I I I LOCATION DESCRIPTION TAX IDENTIFICATION .:!!.9~:OS;~
~w OZ
~ DATE Located in a Portion of NUMBER f! ~ ~ -<
All DISTANCES ARE 3/13/08 Thomas & Carrie Bashaw OlOlW o~
HORIZONTAL LENGTHS S. 2, T. 25 N. 501025008 P.O. Box 755514 6";'1~~~r=
R. 1 W, WM. Honolulu, HI 96836-0514
DRAWING IS NOT A FILE NAME Jefferson County, ~fSi~~~
LEGAL LAND SURVEY Bashaw Washington o~ _0
tI) Z
501025008 (i)
Shrub wetland Habitat
Organic Soil & Emeraent Habitat
Muckv Peat Sand Soil Emergent Habitat
Total
DRAWING 2 - CATEGORY II WETLAND WITH REQUIRED 100 FOOT BUFFER
C!>
.BUffer 7i
. . . !8nsect 5
.'WS
o
. 1
!i ,04 I ,,/A\ '. E3lJfter 7i
. '{. . . ransect ;3
.; r / / 1 '. \
; ,// @ , ;J3\(~}
J",/ / 16.. ~U[!er\ansect 2 w4
/ / /' \ \
7//: ',' 'y \ Buffer \ \
.;1 , / rA\' \ \
.,/' / ",r--.---__. ~ B2\Buffe~ranse.,\1 '" .
//" ,,/./ _ _'_ _ '__ .\-_._ _~'- _ ...:..\ w2,220
/ / " ;-.--.--
/ / estimated south property line /
I
I
I
B,.
I
I
I
/9.,;;
B8/..?"'.
.t ....
I '
Buffer
. . . BUffer 7i
. . . . , . ral1sect6
1'<'
- _ _ . _ _ . _ _ . ..:&J.~~ed north property line "" w13
,./ -.--.--.--'\.--.-
I w1
I
II
<}--- Top Shoreline Sandbar
@
170h
Buffer
27,933.23 ff2
180h
w6
190h
200h
210h
Note:
ACRES
TOTAL WETLAND ON PROPERTY
Shrub wetland Habitat
Oraanic Soil & Emergent Habitat
LEGEND
CD Shrub wetland Habitat
o Oraanic Soil & Emeraent Habitat
@ Muckv Peat Sand Soil Emeraent Habitat
o Dense Forest & Shurbs
@) Planted Grasses
+ ColTl>8SS Stations
w1, 230h = \IVetIand and Habitat Boundary stations
Original building excavated site [yy~y~y_-:s:-
100'BufferBoundary -. -. -. -. -. -.
Buffer width is 100 feet and was established
on site by correcting slope distance to equal
horizonal distance.
0.08 0.08
0.35 0.32
0.67 0.46 Muckv Peat Sand Soil Emeraent Habitat
1.10 0.86 Total
TOTAL BUFFER AND BUILDING SITE AREA
6,482.56 Fe (0.15 A) Oriainal Buildina Site Size
3,533.66 Fe (0.08 A) Oriainal Buildina Site Within Buffer
2,948.9 Fe (0.07 A) Oriainal Builclina Site Outside Buffer
27,927.07 Ff' (0.64 A) Reaulated Buffer Area
1,385.74 Ff' (0.03A) Area of Abandon Road
High Cut Banks I II I , , , , II , , , II ,
The buffer slope ranges from 0 to 70 percent
between the wetland and the east edge of the
original leveled building site.
Drainage Ditch ......... - - -- .. .. ..
AbandonedRoad ---------
FILE NAME
Bashaw
501025008
VVETLAND
CRITICAL AREA DRAWING
LOCATION DESCRIPTION TAX IDENTIFICATION
Located in a Portion of NUMBER
5.2, T. 25 N.
R. 1 W, WM.
Jefferson County,
\M1shington
PROPERTY OWNER
OR CUENT
tj :IE
-- ;:I. !!1 6
..3!.9~:o!;
~ ~ci!S P Z ~
~~; r8~
~~i!ie~;
wcccc.....r-:Z
.....~~ '-Ie
~ Z
G')
O'
I
SCALE: 1- = 50'
50'
I
ALL DISTANCES ARE
HORIZONTAL LENGTHS
DRAWING IS NOT A
LEGAL LAND SURVEY
100'
I
*
DRAWN BY
W David Loggy
DATE
5/28/08
501025008
Thomas & Carrie Bashaw
P.O. Box 755514
Honolulu, HI 96836-0514
Transect 1
Transect 2
Transect 3
Transect 4
Transect 5
Transect 6
Horizontal Distance 100'
19.6' 26.2' 2Z 32.1'
r-----------------------------------------------------------------------
: 25%
21 73' ! 0% 33.07'
EI~v. ! 22' ,
: Abandond Rd.
Slope Gradient: Slope Distance 103.07
and Distance I
Wetland Edge =-t
Horizontal Distance 100'
5' 37.9' 18' 10.7'
,---------------------------------------------------
70%
13.1'
0%
28.4'
,
Excavated Area
25.56'
Elev.
0%
18' ,
Abandond Rd.
Slope Gradient OOA
and Distance 0
5'
Wetland Edge
Slope Distance 106.5'
Horizontal Distance 100'
10' 34.2' 19.6'
r--------------------------------------------
0%
36.2'
, Excavated Area
30.70'
Elev.
Slope Distance 108.2'
Slope Gradient 0%
and Distance
~ 10'
Wetland Edge
5' 47.5' Horizontal Distance 100'
r-------------------------------------
I
,
I
I
I
I
I
30.84' :
Elev. ! Slope Distance 109.00'
,
I
I
I
I
I
Slope Gradient! OOA
and Distance 0
~5'
Wetland Edge
COk
47.5'
'Excav_1.
Horizontal Distance 100'
9' 48.1' 23' 19.9'
r-----------------------------------------------------------------------
35.88'
Elev.
:: , 20%-20.3'
Excavated Area
57'
Slope Distance 108.55'
Slope Gradient
and Distance 0%
~9'
Wetland Edge
Horizontal Distance 100'
2~ 7Z
r-----------------------------------------------------------------------
40.26'
Elev.
Slope Gradient
and Distance
Wetland Edge
Slope Distance 110.42'
0%
28'
DRAWING 3
BUFFER SLOPE PROFILES
TRANSECT 1 THRU 6
/"""-,
~_~.c''''
o
-I
!
~
j\; ~I gl ~ N ~~ln~ ~~+@8Ge8:;;
0
<5' 0 0
!!l. ~ ~ (j) 5' ~ · , , .h · g n i ! · 0 r
~ 0
g" a:>> ~ 0 g~S.~~ii~ ~ ~::J;: -. ~c
:I:
I '" 0- .~ :;; &gf ~.....s-"~
~ )> ~ g9-i- a=g:E= ,.
i i f
:;;. l? w 0.' Hr"" .
i ~ . .1.< ..... ·
c: ~ [ II. iJl a. :::J c.. c.. ll/;
" II \ ~ (Jl II) UJ a"
~ 0-
..
~ i
g- Ii I it
-< II a
~ I i
G II I
II I ~
II I ~
~.
q
r- :I:)>
moO
Q~;:Qr- 0
~~~~ g
S;- z(/) !1i
zi5~~
o-r-Z (Xl ~
(/)r-O q
(/)zmm II
C:OZ(/) at
~-IQ)> Q
~)>-I;:Q
:I:m
(/)
.....
Cll
~~ q
(]I ~
~llJ:!! (Xl 00
OOl r- .... ~i
f\) ~
f\)oom Ol
(]I:rz .....
OOl)> 0 m
(Xl r
o~ s: olD
Cll m :g-<
'<
L
cn;o(J)
<:::: .
or~""'!'J
0000<-1
:r 0 <.
:(J; f\)
~O~(]I
00. Z
:JCS:.
:J.
....
:<
b"5
00
!!l.~
<D_
0.0
S' Z
mC
-um
o CD 0
a~ ;:Q
g ~ g
aC5 )>S
z r- m
~-I
-1~S;
>oz
>< 0
zC ~
c:m:s
s:zz
to::!G')
m:!!
;:Q~
'-I
C5
Z
(JI
o
.....
o
f\)
(JI
o
o
(Xl
I -I
o ::r
:J 0
o :u 3
cOOl
c' 00
- llJ go
!~O
(O-.JOl
0l(JI=l
(Xl(JI1j)'
~~llJ
o~~
(]I :r
..... Ol
~ ~
"U
;:u
o
0"U
;:um
g~
mo
z:e
-Iz
m
;:u
f.EW"lSttI f:I)
lrAitLSt1BE(o)
Z8V.'tI6vllDd
LWZlDll'O CI
~CI'flI3I
CltVDA9OO1
~g~
~f:
~~~
~~~
~~~
~~~
~~~
Ga.~
~~~
:~
!!.o
I~
It"!
~~
~a
g:g~ z
N!f!.~ :
g.. -
et~~
~s~
~~g
~i'
~~
~i
~..
!i
~~
~[
C
,n
c,
o
::u
~
z
(i)
en
o
<
m
::u
)>
....
....
en
-t
m
"'U
r
)>
Z
.~,~ ~ LV
I
,
I
,
I
,------- - -------
~- -------- '
, ------- - _______ i'k_______ _ I
. "",' lV~p:------
, ~~~---------
, - ~ _______ I
~ ------- .
, --------_______ --------_ I
" ~ --------\\;
I I ~"- i)i
, / I I
, ' I,
, CJ jl
, I I ,I
j'
" If/ I') I
, g m I I '
<D!i I"
0.(1) I
, oWo. I'
, ! -r--//------1
, ~- i 1,1 I
~/ I
-L------------ .U I
__.-------- QriveWfiL----------.
'-'7--- ------ I I
I ,f /--------- j I
i~ i
./ \ .
: ~"'" i
',.0~, i
"'/~ .
1"\ "'. I
,...."-~, ~ .
I?,-~ ~~ ~
! ~~"""~ I
a; e i
"
"
"
0'1 w+>- (.oJ-
(x. 0,:"" -w
CD TV lX' lX'
cooco-l'o.
(n a:""" a
Q:1 to 0;) -.J
~ ~~ ~
l3o~o
~ g~ ~
~ ~~~
N
'"
","-J
"'w
w'"
(:Do,
",...
:a:J2
0'0
~g
~~
I
1
,
1
,
,
I
,
....
o
~
::;:~g ~
0-4d'1Q)~
D )>
n
-~~
'"
'" w m
\2g;~
co W N
iD m (n
om m
::!tJt,~
coo
00:"'"
"" 01 U>
2:2:~
I!'\? ~I!'I!' I!'Q~IC: 0 I
!t~;; ~ ,~~~!!. ~ ..
1:'~NU1AJ~!!..g:'1D
m~g~g.~~~a~5:~
~,~a.g ~.~5.5.5.5.
~tga.a fg~
~g;;~ i~ t:
~~~~ s:~ ~~m
'~:~ ~ g
~ ij il ~
~ ~~. ~
& tatO
OOClO
a, .'~o
0) 0) k) OJ
I.... 50
[ ~
%
0-
'"
m
l"'..,)
5'
'"
~
c}
-0
(f)
:r
o
!!
5'
co
~
g
(f)
:r
o
m
ii>
"
0-
m
o
c
"
0-
..
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I @J
I
I
j
/
/
/
VICINITY MAP
http://maps.co.jefferson.wa.us/servle1Jcom.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=ovmap _outs... 217/2008
, .,
"4 ~
.
.
~~:-}
,.::"' Loggy Soil and Wetland Consulting
W. David Loggy. CPSS and Wetland Specialist
P. O. Box 2347. Port Angeles. WA 98362-0303
Phone:36Q-457-3920 - Fax: 36Q-457-0131
Toll Free Phone 866-805-1497
Email: wdploggy@olypen.com
,t...
ARCPACS
~
Gertifierl
Specializing in:
Soil Mapping and Classification
Soil Investigations and Soil Site Analysis
Wetland Mapping, Delineation and Restoration
Soil Redox Potential Monitoring for Hydric Soil Determination
Professional Qualification and Experience
W. David Loggy
Loggy Soil & Wetland Consulting
Title: Consulting Soil Scientist
Total Years Experiences: 42
PROFESSIONAL SPECIALTIES:
Soils
Member:
Surveys and Inventories
Soil Classification, Genesis,
Morphology - USDA,UNIFIED, and
ASSHO
Identification of Hazards & Limitations
Hydric Soils of Problem & Atypical
Wetland Situations
Field Fertility Testing
Erosion Potential, Control and Plans
Correlation of Agri. Soil Class-
ification to UNIFIED & ASHO
Attributes Affecting Septic Design--
Depth to Seasonal Water Tables
Education:
BS, Range Conservation, Colorado State
University, 1966 (Major areas of study,
included Biology, Ecology and Soils)
Associate of Arts, (Pre-Forestry),
Casper College, 1961
Certification! Affiliations:
Certified Professional Soil Scientist (CPSS)
No. 576, (ARCPACS), 29 years
Washington Society of Professional
Soil Scientists
Society of Wetland Scientists
National Society of Consulting Soil
Scientist, Inc
Wetlands
Inventories, Type Determinations,
Delineations, Function & Value
Analysis, & Reports
Mitigation Plans and Monitoring
Enhancement and Restoration
Soil Redox Potential Monitoring
Environmental
Soils, Wetland & CAS Data for ECs.
DEIS & FEIS
Positions Held: Newsletter Editor & Board Member
for Washington Society of Professional
Soil Scientist
Awards: Five Certificates of Merit Awards
For Sustained Superior Performance
';' ...'10"
Summary of Experiences
Project and Program Manager, or Interdisplinary Team
Member on 25 major projects in Colorado and Alaska.
Thirty an one half years experience in soil survey, and wa-
ter planning and budgeting for forest planning, mining and
ski area projects, long term and independent timber sales,
and road layout and construction. Thirty Five years of
experience in wetland mapping and management, and
riparian buffer management and establishment.
Since 1979 have done wetland and slope stability deter-
mination and analysis, and soil erosion plan work in
Snohomish, Island, Skagit, Jefferson and Clallam
Counties, and the cities of Port Angeles, Port Town-
send, Lake Forest Park and Marysville.
Fifteen technical reports and papers authored or co-
authored.
Training in U.S. Army Crops of Engineers Wetland
Delineation Method and State of Washington's Pro-
posed Wetland Functional Assessment Method. USDA,
NRCS. Training in Advanced Hvdric Soils in accor-
dance to standards of the National Technical Commit-
tee for Hvdric Soils. OHWM determination trainin!! &
Revised Washinf!ton State Wetland Ratin!! Svstem.
Selected Project Experience
Private Soil and Wetland Consultin!!-1997 to Present.
I have conducted soil slope stability analysis on identi-
fied critical areas for timber harvest sites and housing
development sites in Skagit and Clallam Counties. I
have also developed an erosion control plan for a hous-
ing development plat in Clallam County and conducted
wetland inventories, delineation and rehabilitation pro-
jects for reality companies, developers and private
landowners in Clallam, Skagit, Snohomish, Jefferson
and Island Counties, and within the city boundaries of
Port Angeles, Port Townsend, Lake Forest Park and
Marysville.. Have conducted and been subcontractor
on wetland projects since in the above areas since 1997.
National Cooperative Soil Survey, U.S. Forest Service.
I have thirty years experience in soil identification, classi-
fication, soil sampling, standard testing methods, and map-
ping soils to the National Cooperative Soil Survey. I sur-
veyed and mapped and/or supervised the surveying
and mapping of 3 million acres between the states of
Nebraska, Colorado and Alaska that included more
than 85 organic and mineral soil series. Thirty of the
soils were organic and mineral hydric soils associated
with estuary, and bog and fen wetlands (both forested
and non-forested).
Water Management, U.S. Forest Service. Developed
modeling protocol for erosion and sediment transfer haz-
ards, and co-developed geomorphic risk assessment of
potential fish habitat impacts for forest management alter-
native practices. Co-developed a classification system
for field identifying Class III Streams (equivalent to
the State of Washington's Type 4 Waters) based on
sedimentation potential. Co-authored a protocol for
identifying, classifying and mapping 34 wetland habitat
types using GIS soil and plant communities databases
for S.E. Alaska. As Watershed Program Manager for 5
years, I supervised three soil scientists, and two hydrolo-
gists. I coordinated, managed, directed and budgeted the
Ketchikan Area's watershed program and projects, involv-
ing watershed analysis, soil and hydrology management
consulting, and coordinated the watershed program of
work with other resource units. As soil survey supervisor
in Alaska, I supervised from 6 to 12 people in 2 person
crews per year.
Technical Soil Management Services U.S. Forest Ser-
vice. I conducted soil and wild land watershed support
services for slope stability analysis, landslide stabilization,
application of soil quality standards, erosion analysis and
site surveys. I also identified wetlands, and interpreted
wetland and hydric soils data for timber sale planning,
layout, administration, fertility and regeneration re-
search studies. I provided soil analysis for rock pit devel-
opment, road location, and construction, and administra-
tion, recreation sites, administrative sites, ski areas, mine
development, hydroelectric sites and a pulp mill air pol1u-
tion study.
Forest and Project Planning, U.S. Forest Service. I was
the Soil and Water Consultant or IDT member for environ-
mental analyses for two Ketchikan Pulp Co.'s Long Term
Sale - five year periods, many smal1er timber sales, the
U.S. Borax Molybdenum Bulk Sampling Mine Access
Road, Swan Lake Hydro-electric Dam, and Tongass Land
Management Plan Revision (1987-90). I wrote soil and
water standards and guidelines, management prescriptions,
and the soil, water, air and wetland section for environ-
mental analysis. I co-authored and edited a white paper
on riparian concepts for S.E. Alaska.
Page 1 of 1
Zoe Ann Lamp
From: Donna Frostholm
Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2008 11 :26 AM
To: Zoe Ann Lamp
Subject: Bashaw wetland review - MLA07-00526
Zoe: The following are my comments on the Supplemental Report of Jurisdictional Land Areas and
Site Plan Information for Parcel 501025008, which was prepared by Loggy Soil and Wetland Consulting
(dated September 29, 2008) for the Bashaw property at Hazel Point.
I have checked the buffer averaging section of the "old code" and the Loggy report meets all the
requirements. The old code did not require an enhancement plan. Therefore, I will not be
recommending any of the performance standards or monitoring requirements that I mentioned
previously. The report is okay as is.
My only comment would be that the Loggy report states "A drainage ditch that is presently discharging
runoff onto the steep slope on the north end is resulting in a minor area of sediment being deposited
into the wetland. The sediment will be minimized or eliminated when the discharge and erosion caused
by the drainage ditch is corrected under the erosion control plan required for the development." Since
this is being used as part of the rationale for buffer averaging, I would suggest adding a condition to the
permit to ensure that runoff is addressed appropriately at the time of building review.
Let me know if you have any questions,
Vontt.cVFv~
:Associate P{anner /W et{and 'l3io{ogist
Jefferson County 'Deve{oyment :Review 'Division
621 Sheridan Street
Port Townsend; Washington 98368
4frostho{m@cojefferson.wa.us
360.379.4466
All e-mail sent to this address will be received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and may be subject to Public Disclosure under
Chapter 42.56 RCW.
11/13/2008