HomeMy WebLinkAboutWetland Delineation 999008303
,
., Loggy Soil and Wetland Consulting
W. David Loggy, CPSS and Wetland Specialist
P. O. Box 2347, Port Angeles, WA 98362
Phone:360457 -392Q-Fax: 360-457-0131
Email: wdploggy@olypen.com
Web Page: Olypen.com/wdploggy
,t,
ARCPACS
~~
Certifierl
Specializing in:
Soil Mapping and Classification
Soil Investigations- Soil Site Analysis
Wetland Mapping, Delineation and Restoration
Soil Redox Potential Monitoring for Hydric Soil Determination
REVISED REPORT
WETLAND CRITICAL AREA STUDY
CONDUCTED ON PROPERTY
Located in a portion of
Section 4 T.30N, R.IW, W.M.,
Jefferson County, Washington
Parcel Numbers:
999008303
Title Owner:
Eric & Casey Reeter
6532 41st. Ave. SW
Seattle, W A 98136
Study Requested By:
Eric & Casey Reeter
6532 41st. Ave. SW
Seattle, W A 98136
Proposed Land Action:
Proposed Single Family Dwelling
Study Name:
Reeter 999008303
Regulatory Agency
Jefferson County
Department of Community Development
Reference For Study:
Jefferson County Code Critical Area Ordinance
Chapter 18.22 Critical Areas Article VII-Wetlands
Study Conducted By:
Loggy Soil and Wetland Consulting
W. David Loggy, CPSS
P.O. Box 2347
Port Angeles, W A 98362-0303
(360) 457-3920
September 24, 2008
GOVERNMENT AGENCIES REGULATORY OVERSIGHT FOR WATERS
OF THE U.S. INCLUDING WETLANDS.
Waters of the US including wetlands are regulated under federal, state, county and city laws and
regulations. The lead agency is usually the county or city planning departments within which you live in.
Nearly all counties and cites have a minimal size wetland that they will not regulate. Even though certain
wetlands may not be regulated under local county or city jurisdiction because oftheir size and mayor may
not require buffers, DOES NOT make those areas "non-wetland". Federal and state government
agencies regulations require approval and permits before discharging fill into or draining waters ofthe
United States including wetlands, even if the county or city is the lead agency for you project. In some
cases you may be required to obtain local, state and federal permits before development related to waters of
the U.S. and wetlands. There are certain cases where the Federal Court or the Supreme Court has
determined that Federal agencies, such as the US Army Corp of Engineers, do not have jurisdiction over
certain types of wetlands. For example, based on a U.S. 2001 Supreme Court decision, federal agencies no
longer have regulatory oversight for wetlands determined to be isolated that are not associated with
interstate commerce use. The Court ruling did not change Washington state laws on wetlands and isolated
wetlands are considered waters of the state. Even though a local government or federal agencies may not
regulate certain waters of the US including wetlands, does not mean the Washington State government does
not. Washington State through the Department of Ecology and Department ofFish and Wildlife regulates
all wetlands and waters within the state except for those artificial wetlands intentionally created from
nonwetland sites, including, but not limited to, irrigation and drainage ditches, grass-lined swales, canals
detentions facilities, wastewater treatment facilities, farm ponds, and landscape amenities, or those wetland
created after July 1 1990, that were unintentionally created as a result of the construction of a road, street,
or highway. It is prudent to check with appropriate federal, state and local government agencies to secure
approval and the proper permits before proceeding to discharge fill into, or drain waters of the United
States including wetlands or their buffers.
INSERTED BLANK PAGE
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
CONSULTING COMPANY
INVESTIGATOR
TYPE OF ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREA INVISTIGATION
LAND OWNER
APPLICANT
PROPOSED PROJECT
PARCEL NUMBER
SITE LOCATION
ZONING
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
EXISTING CONDITIONS
Landscape Position
Slope gradient
Geologic Materials
Water types present
2-6
2
2
2
2
5. NON-WETLAND SITES
A. UPLAND PLOT
3
3-4
6. WETLAND SITES
A. WETLAND PLOT
4
4-6
CRITICAL AREA DETERMINATION & DELINEATION
Wetland Functions And Other Characteristics
USFW Wetland Classification
Buffer Determination and Marking
6-8
7
8
8
TABLES
TABLE ONE - DOMINATE VEGETATION ON SITE 3
TABLE TWO - DOMINATE VEGETATION ON WETLAND SITE 5
TABLE THREE -WETLAND FUNCTIONS AND OTHER CHARACTERISTICS 7
TABLE FOUR - USFW WETLAND CLASSIFICATION 8
TABLE FIVE - BUFFER WIDTH DETERMINATION 8
APPENDICES
APPENDIX A - APPROACH AND METHODS
APPENDIX B - FIELD DATA SHEETS AND WETLAND RATING FIELD DATA FORM
APPENDIX C - DRAWINGS AND MAPS OF SITE
INSERTED BLANK PAGE
INSERTED BLANK PAGE
APPENDIX A
APPROACH AND METHODS
APPROACH AND METHODS
Wetland Determination
Two levels of information were gathered for this analysis. These included:
a) Review of preliminary site data and,
b) On-site investigation to determine the presence of wetlands.
A) A review of existing information was conducted to develop background knowledge of physical
features, and to identify the potential for wetland occurrence on the subject property. The resource
documents available for preliminary review of the site conditions included: USDA Soil Conservation
Service (SCS), "Soil Survey of Jefferson County Area Washington", (1990) aerial photography, and the
City of Port Townsend and Jefferson County Planning Department's data.
b) During the on-site investigation, wetland areas were determined and verified on the basis ofthree
parameters: Hydrophytic Vegetation, Hydric Soils, and Wetland Hydrology, as recommended in the
Washinf!ton State Identification and Delineation Manual (Washington State Department of Ecology,
Ecology Publication #96-944, March 1997). Wetlands categories and wetland vegetation classes were
identified and classified using the Washinf!ton State Wetlands Ratinf! System of Western Washinf!ton.
Revised. Ecolof!Y Publication # 04-06-025. Thomas Hruby. PhD(Washington State Department of
Ecology, August 2004).
A positive wetland determination is made when all three parameters are present, or in certain situations
determined following the guidelines recommended in wetland determination procedures, or for atypical situations or
problem areas.
Hydrophvtic Vee:etation
Areas where more than 50% of the dominant species present from all strata are hydrophytes (plants adapted
to growth and reproduction in saturated soil conditions) are considered to be inside the wetland boundary, unless
clear evidence of hydric soils or wetland hydrology cannot be established. A species is considered dominant if it is
equal to or greater than 20% areal cover, or exerts a controlling influence on, or defmes the character of a
community. Hydrophytic vegetation is determined to be present, when under normal circumstances:
More than 50% of the dominant plant species in a plant community have an indicator category of
Obligate Wetland (OBL), Facultative Wetland (F ACW), and/or Facultative (F AC) as listed in "National List of
Plant Species that Occur in Wetlands: Northwest (Region 9)", (Reed, Porter B., Jr., 1988), and the "1993
Supplement to National List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: Northwest (Region 9)" dated December 1993
that became effective on March 31, 1994. Indicator categories ofFACW+, FACW-, FAC+, are included as FACW
status.
'F AC+ species are considered to be wetter (i.e., have a greater estimated probability of occurring in
wetlands) than F AC species, while F AC- species are considered to be drier (i.e., have a lesser estimated probability
of occurring in wetlands) than FAC species.' Plant indicator status defmitions are presented in TABLE 1 below.
This Plant Indicator Status Categories system was developed for the USFWS National Wetlands Inventory by
Cowardin et al. (1979). The National Plant List Panel, Reed, Porter B., and Jr. modified it in 1988 and 1993. The Wetland
Indicator Category (WIC) used in this report refers to the plants Indicator Svmbol as referred to in the table below.
National Indicators reflect the range of estimated probabilities (expressed as a frequency of occurrence) of
a species occurring in a wetland versus a non-wetland across the entire distribution ofthe species. ("National List of
Plant Species that Occur in Wetlands: Northwest (Region 9)", Reed, Porter B., Jr., 1988), and the 1993 Supplement
to List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: Northwest (Region 9) dated December 1993 that became effective
Purpose and Approach Continued
on March 31, 1994. Percentages expressed as estimated probability.
TABLE 1
Indicator Cateaory
Indicator Svmbol
Definition
OBLIGATE WETLAND
PLANTS
OBL
Occur almost always, >99% (estimated
probability) in wetlands under natural
conditions. <1 % in non wetlands.
FACULTATIVE WETLAND
PLANTS
FACW
Usually occur in wetlands, 67-99% and
1-33% in non-wetlands.
FACULTATIVE PLANTS
FAC
Equally likely to occur in wetlands and
non-wetlands 34-66%.
F ACUL T A TIVE UPLAND
PLANTS
FACU
Usually occur in non wetlands 67-99%,
but occasionally found in wetlands 1-33%.
OBLIGATE UPLAND
Plants
UPL
Almost always occur in non-wetlands of
Northwest Region 9, >99%. <1%
in wetlands.
Hvdric Soils
There have been tremendous scientific changes since 1991 in several ofthe indicators such as the
introduction of aquic conditions to cover the requirements for saturation, reduction, and morphological indicators
used to defme the modified aquic moisture regime, and mottles and low chroma colors being replaced by
redoximorphic features. Because of these changes, we consult the US Department of Agriculture, Natural Resource
Conservation Service. 1998. "Field Indicators of Hydric Soils in the United States, Reversion 5.1". G. W. Hurt,
Whited, P. M., and Pringle, R. F. (eds.), USDA, NRCS, Ft. Worth, TX for guidance and decision in making fmal
hydric soils determinations.
Additionally, compliance to changes in Hydric Soils of the United States published in Federal RegisterNol.
59, No. 133/July 13, 1994 and Vol. 60, No. 37/February 24, 1995 addressing Criterion 2 of the Criteria for Hydric
Soils definition is being observed. The main purpose for the criteria is to create
Hydric Soil Lists. Criteria 1,3, and 4 can serve as both database criteria and as indicators for identification
of hydric soils. When Criteria 1,3, and 4 are used to document the presence of a hydric soil, proof that anaerobiosis
exists must also be obtained. Criterion 2 serves only to retrieve hydric soils from the database. Also, the wording
for Criteria 1 and 2 were changed in 1999 to incorporate recent changes in Soil Taxonomy (Soil Survey Staff, 1999).
Field indicators of hydric soil conditions in this document, (Land Resource Region (LRR) A that includes
Western Washington), are presented here in an abbreviated form and include:
Purpose and Approach Continued
Field indicators of hydric soil conditions in this document, (Land Resource Region (LRR) A that includes
Western Washington), are presented here:
(1) ALL SOILS:
At. Histosols;
A2. Histic Epipedons;
A4. Hydrogen sulfide;
A6. Organic Bodies;
A7. Mucky mineral;
A8. Muck Presence;
AtO. 2 cm Muck;
All. Depleted Below Dark Surface; and
At2. Thick Dark Surface
(2) SANDY SOILS:
St. Sandy Mucky Mineral;
S4. Sandy Gleyed Matrix;
SS.Sandy Redox; and
S6. Stripped Matrix
(3) LOAMY AND CLAYEY SOILS:
Ft. Loamy Mucky Mineral;
F2. Loamy Gleyed Matrix;
F3. Depleted Matrix;
F6. Redox Dark Surface;
F7.Depleted Dark Surface; and
F8. Redox Depressions;
Wetland Hvdrolo2V
Water is the driving force for wetlands. Indications of wetland hydrology are those where the presence of
water has an overriding influence on characteristics of vegetation and soils due to anaerobic and reducing
conditions, respectively.
Areas that are seasonally saturated and/or inundated to the surface for a consecutive number of days for
more than 12.5% ofthe growing season are wetlands provided the soil and vegetation parameters are met. Areas
wet between 5% and 12% of the growing season in most years mayor may not be wetlands. Areas saturated to the
surface for less than 5% of the growing season are non-wetlands. Wetland hydrology exists if field indicators are
present.
Field indicators of wetland hydrology may include, but are not limited to visual observations of inundation,
ponding, soil saturation, oxidized root channels (rhizospheres) associated with living roots and rhizomes,
watermarks, drift lines, water-borne sediment deposition, or wetland drainage patterns.
The growing season starting and ending dates are required to evaluate hydrologic data. For wetland
determinations, the growing season is determined using the local SCS county soils surveys. Generally, the growing
season is calculated based on the "28 degrees F or lower" temperature threshold at a frequency of "5 years in 10".
For much of western Washington at low elevations, the mesic growing season (March I to October 31) has been
considered a good rule. However, in some areas of the Puget Sound Lowlands and coastal areas the growing season
occurs all year round because the soil temperature at 19.7 inches below the soil surface is higher than 41 degrees F.
Purpose and Approach Continued
Plant Identification and Classification
Primary references used for scientific plant names and the endemic and non-native or exotic status of plants
to the North Olympic Peninsula were determined as found in Flora of the Pacific Northwest by Hitchcock and
Cronquist, Univ. of Washington Press, 1972. Other references referred to included: (1) A Field Guide to the
Common Wetland Plants of Western Washington & Northwestern Oregon by Sarah Spear Cooke, editor,
Washington Native Plant Society, May 1997; Wetland plants of Oregon & Washington by Jennifer Guard, Lone
Pine Publishing, 1995; (2) Plants ofthe Pacific Northwest Coast- Washington, Oregon, British Columbia & Alaska
edited by Pojar and Mackinnon, D.C. Forest Service, Research Program, Lone Pine Publishing, 1994 and, D.C.
Forest Service, Research Program, Lone Pine Publishing, 1994; and (3) Northwest Weeds by Ronald J. Taylor,
Mountain Press Publishing Company, 1990
APPENDIX B
WETLAND FIELD DATA SHEETS
WETLAND CLASSIFICATION SHEETS
DATA FORM 1
(W A State Wetland Delineation Manual or
1987 Corps Wetland Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: Parcel # 999008303 Date: 7/7/07
Applicant/owner: ERIC REETER & CASEY REETER, 6532 41ST AVE SW, County: Jefferson
SEATTLE WA98136
Invistigator(s): Kim Meehan-Roulst and David Loggy State: Washington
Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Y es ~ NoD Community ID: Herbaceous
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation) Yes 0 No~ Transect ID:
Is the area a potential problem area Yes 0 No~ Plot ID: Upland Plot 1
VEGETATION
% %
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Cover Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Cover Indicator
Bromus hordeaceus Herb 50 UPL
Lolium perenne Herb 30 FACU-
Agrostis Stolonifera Herb 10 FAC
Taraxacum officinale Herb 10 FACU
o
o
I81 Wetland
Remarks:
I81
o
o
Hydrophytic vegetation present? Yes 0 No ~
HYDROLOGY
Is it the e:rowine: season? Yes~ No[] Based on: Jefferson County Soil Survey
D..Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks) Wetland Hydrology Indicators
D..Stream, lake, or tidal gauge Primary Indicators:
Q Inundated
D Aerial photographs o Saturated in Upper 12 inches
o Water Marks
0 Other o Drift Lines
o Sediment Deposits
Depth of inundation: o Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth to saturated soil Inches +21
Depth to free water in pit: Inches +21 Secondary Indicators (2 or more required)
o Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 inches
Field Observations: o Water Stained Leaves
o Local Soil Survey Data
Wetland hydrology present YesD No [gI o FAC-NEUTRAL Test
o Other (Explain in Remarks)
REMARKS:
SOILS
Map Unit Name: Clallam gravelly sandy loam
(Series and Phase): Drainage Class: moderately well drained
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Loamy skeletal, isotic, mesic Oxyaquic Vitrandic Haploxerepts
Field observation confirm mapped unit Yes D No ~
Corrected Map Unit Name or Taxonomy (Sub~roup & Great Group): Clallam gravelly sandy variant
Profile Descrintions:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle or Redox Colors Mottle or Redox Texture, Concretions,
(Inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Size/ Structure, etc.
Contrast
0-2 Al 10YR3/3 dark brown fine sand, weak very
fine granular structure, many very
fme and many common roots,
clear wavy boundary
2-4 A2 10YR3/4 dark yellowish brown fine sand,
strong medium granular structure,
common fine roots, clear wavy
boundary
4-8 A3 10YR3/3(wet) dark brown (wet), brown (dry)
lOYR5/3(dry) weak fme sand, <15% gravel,
common fine roots, abrupt wavy
boundary
8-13 Bwl 2.5Y4/3 2.5Y4/4 lID dark grayish brown moderate fine
subangular blocky structure
13-21 Bw2 1OYR3/6 lOYR4/6 2cF dark yellowish brown gravelly
sand, massive, parting to weak
fine subangular blocky structure,
abrupt wavy boundary.
21-23 2Cd lOYR7/2 (dry) 10YR4/6 lcD light gray (dry), brown (wet)
lOYR4/3 (wet) extremely gravelly sand, hard
when dry, massive.
Hvdric Soil Indicators:
D Histosol D Concretions
D Histic Epipedon D High Organic Content in Surface Layer of Sandy Soils
D Sulfidic Odor D Organic Streaking in Sand Soils
D Aquic Moisture Regime D Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
D Reducing Conditions D National Hydric Soils List Listed on
D Gleved or Low-Chroma Colors D Other (Explain in Remarks)
REMARKS:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes D No ~ Is the sample point within a wetland Yes D No ~
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes D No ~
Hydric Soils Present? Yes D No ~
REMARKS:
DATA FORM 1
(W A State Wetland Delineation Manual or
1987 Corps Wetland Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: Parcel # 999008303 Date: 7/7/07
Applicant/owner: ERIC REETER & CASEY REETER, 6532 41 ST AVE SW, County: Jefferson
SEATTLE W A98136
Investigator(s): Kim Meehan-Roulst and David Loggy State: Washington
Do normal circumstances exist on the site? Yes [8J NoD Community ID: Herbaceous
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation) YesD No [8J Transect ID:
Is the area a potential problem area YesD No [8J Plot ID: Wetland Plot
VEGETATION
% %
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Cover Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Cover Indicator
Holcus lanatus Herb 50 FAC
Festuca rubra Herb 30 FAC+
Agrostis alba var. alba Herb 20 FAC-
~
o
~
Hydrophytic vegetation present? Yes [8J No D
HYDROLOGY
Is it the t!rowint! season? Yes [8J NoD Based on: Jefferson County Soil Survey
D..Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks) Wetland Hydrology Indicators
D..Stream, lake, or tidal gauge Primary Indicators:
D_ Inundated
D Aerial photographs D Saturated in Upper 12 inches
~ Water Marks
D Other D Drift Lines
~ Sediment Deposits
Depth of inundation: D Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth to saturated soil Inches +37 inches
Depth to free water in pit: Inches +37 inches Secondary Indicators (2 or more reuuired)
o Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 inches
Field Observations: o Water Stained Leaves
o Local Soil Survey Data
Wetland hydrology present Yes~ NoD o FAC-NEUTRAL Test
o Other (Explain in Remarks)
REMARKS: Soil redox concentrations start within 12 inches of the soil surface and within an "E" Horizon indicating the
soil is saturated to this depth during the early growing season.
SOILS
Map Unit Name: Swan town gravelly sandy loam
(Series and Phase): Drainage Class: Somewhat poorly drained
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Loamy-skeletal, isotic, acid, mesic Typic Petraquept
Field observation confirm mapped unit Yes 0 No [gI
Corrected Map Unit Name or Taxonomy (Subszroup & Great Group): wet variant of Zylstra series
Profile Descrintions:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle or Redox Colors Mottle or Redox Texture, Concretions,
(Inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist (Munsell Moist) AbundancelSizel Structure, etc.
Contrast
0-7 A IOYR2/2 very dark brown sandy loam,
moderate :fille granular structure,
common fine and medium roots,
abrupt wavy boundary.
7-11 Eg 2.5Y6/1 (dry) IOYR4/6 c2p gray (dry), light gray (wet) fine
2.5Y7/2 (wet) 10YR212 organic clumps sandy loam, weak coarse sub-
angular blocky structure, hard
when dry, few fine roots, clear
wavy boundary
11-16 Bwlg 2.5Y5/1 7.5YR4/6 m3p gray :fille sandy loam, weak.
medium subangular blocky
structure, few fine roots, gradual
wavy boundary
16-29 Bw2g 2.5Y6/2 IOYR5/6 c2p light brownish gray fine sand,
common coarse organic patches
on ped faces. weak medium sub-
angular blocky structure, no roots
gradual wavy boundarv
29-37 C 7.5YR3/4 7.5YR4/4 elf dark brown fine sand, massive
Hvdric Soil Indicators:
o Histosol o Concretions
o Histic Epipedon o High Organic Content in Surface Layer of Sandy Soils
o Sulfidic Odor [gI Organic Streaking in Sand Soils
o Aquic Moisture Regime o Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
[gI Reducing Conditions o National Hydric Soils List Listed on
[gI Gleved or Low-Chroma Colors o Other (Explain in Remarks)
REMARKS:
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes [gI No 0 Is the sample point within a wetland Yes [gI No 0
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes [gI No 0
Hydric Soils Present? Yes [gI No 0
REMARKS: Hydric Soil Indicator = All. Depleted Below Dark Surface
43f(2) Soil with contrasting mottles and or low chroma matrix
Wetland name or nwnber!c()'2iYJ't
WETLAND RATING FORM - WESTERN WASHINGTON
Version 2 - Updated July 2006 to increase accuracy and reproducibility among users
Name of wetland (ifknown): Date of site visit: 1/1/0 7-
Rated Trained by Ecology? Yes~No_ Date of training ~11f!IC;Z>
SEC:!:L TWNSHP: &PM RNOE: I KJ Is Srr/R in Appendix O? Yes_ No2
Map of wetland unit: Figure _ Estimated size if) , tj .b
SUMMARY OF RATING
Category based on FUNCTIONS provided by wetland
1_ II_ III/IV
Category I := Score >=70
Category II = Score 5 1-69
Category 1lI = Score 30-50
Category IV:= Score < 30
Score for Water Quality Functions
Score for Hydrologic Functions
Score for Habitat Functions
TOTAL score for Functions
;1
1/1'
Category based on SPECIAL CHARACTERISTICS of wetland
1_ 11_ DoesnotApply~
Final Category (choose thc "h;ghcst" catego,!, from ahove) 17Jf I
Summary of basic information about the wetland unit
De ressional
Riverine
Lake-frin e
810
Flats
Freshwater Tidal
Check ifunit has multiple
HOM classes resent
Wetland Rating Form - western Washington
version 2
August 2004
'.
Wetland name or number
D8'$,o3
Does the wetland unit being rated meet any of the criteria below?
If you answer YES to any of the questions below you will need to protect the wetland
according to the regulations regarding the special characteristics found in the wetland.
SP I. Has the wetland unit been documented as a habitat for any Federally
Threatened or Endangered animal or plant species (TIE /!'pecies)?
For the purposes of this rating system, "documented" means the wetland is on the
a ro riate state or federal database.
SP2. Has the wetland unit been documented as habitat for any State listed
Threatened or Endangered animal species?
For the purposes of this rating system, "documented" means the wetland is on the
appropriate state database. Note: Wetlands with State listed plant species are
cate orized as Cate or I Natural Herita e Wetlands see . 19 of data fonn .
SP3. Does the wetland unit contain individuals of Priority species listed by the
WDFWfor the state?
x
~.
SP4. Does the wetland unit have a local significance in addition to its fUnctions?
For example, the wetland has been identified in the Shoreline Master
Program, the Critical Areas Ordinance, or in a local management plan as
having special significance.
x
To comolete the next oart of the data sheet you will need to determine the
Hvdrogeomorphic Class of the wetland being rated
The hydrogeomorphic classification groups wetlands into those that function in similar ways. This
simplifies the questions needed to answer how well the wetland functions. The Hydrogeomorphic
Class ofa wetland can be detennined using the key below. See p. 24 for more detailed instructions
on classifYing wetlands.
Wetland Rating Form _. western Washington
version 2
2
August 2004
'"
Wetland name or number (('&&r~#
A".. ~
o:;t)~)
Classification of Wetland Units in Western Washington
1. A~e water levels in the entire unit usually controlled by tides (Le. except during floods)?
~ go to 2 YES - the wetland class is Tidal Fringe
If yes, is the salinity of the water during periods of annual low flow below 0.5 ppt (parts per
thousand)? YES - Freshwater Tidal Fringe NO - Saltwater Tidal Fringe (Estuarine)
If your wetland can be classified as a Freshwater Tidal Fringe use the forms for Riverine
wetlands. Ifit is Saltwater Tidal Fringe it is rated as an Estuarine wetland Wetlands that
were called estuarine in the first and second editions of the rating system are called Salt
Water Tidal Fringe in the Hydrogeomorphic Classification. Estuarine wetlands were
categorized separately in the earlier editions, and this separation is being kept in this
revision. To maintain consistency between editions, the term "Estuarine" wetland is kept. .
Please note, however, that the characteristics that define Category I and II estuarine
wetlands have changed (see p. ).
2. The entire wetland unit is flat and precipitation is the only source (>90%) of water to it.
Groundwater and surface water runoff are NOT sources of water to the unit.
@- go to 3 YES - The wetland class is Flats
If your wetland can be classified as a "Flats" wetland, use the form for Depressional
wetlands.
3. Does the entire wetland unit meet both of the following criteria?
_The vegetated part of the wetland is on the shores ofa body of permanent open water
(without any vegetation on the surface) at least 20 acres (8 ha) in size;
_At least 30% of the open water area is deeper than 6.6 ft (2 m)?
@=gO to 4 YES - The wetland class is Lake-fringe (Lacustrine Fringe)
4. Does the entire wetland unit meet all of the following criteria?
_The wetland is on a slope (slope can be very gradual),
_The water flows through the wetland in one direction (unidirectional) and usually
comes from seeps. It may flow subsurface, as sheetflow, or in a swale without
distinct banks.
!/' The water leaves the wetland without being impounded?
NOTE: Surface water does not pond in these type of wetlands except occasionally in
very small and shallow depressions or behind hummockf (d~re!.,sions flYf uS,ually
~i. . <3ft diameter and less than 1 fiJOt deep). Cern ;'.uc+acl f/tJ J1 d De, !DLU
{NO go to 5 YES - The wetland class is Slope
---.
Wetland Rating Form - western Washington
version 2
3
August 2004
Wetland name or number ~ S<<;i'~ e. WY608 3D j
5. Does the entire wetland unit meet all of the following criteria?
_ The unit is in a valley, or stream channel, where it gets inundated by overbank
flooding from that stream or river
_ The overbank flooding occurs at least once every two years.
NOTE: The riverine unit can contain depressions that are filled with water when the river is
anotflooding.
l~- go to 6 YES - The wetland class is Riverine
6. Is the entire wetland unit in a topographic depression in which water ponds, or is saturated to the
surface, at some time during the year. This means that any outlet, ifpresent, is higher than the
i~r of the wetland
~ go to 7 YES - The wetland class is Depressional
7. Is the entire wetland unit located in a very flat area with no obvious depression and no overbank
flooding. The unit does not pond surface water more than a few inches. The unit seems to be
maintained by high groundwater in the area. The wetland may be ditched, but has no obvious
n.a~ outlet.
~ go to 8 YES - The wetland class is Depressional
8. Your wetland unit seems to be difficult to classify and probably contains several different HGM
clases. For example, seeps at the base of a slope may grade into a riverine floodplain, or a small
stream within a depressional wetland has a zone of flooding along its sides. GO BACK AND
IDENTIFY WHICH OF THE HYDROLOGIC REGIMES DESCRIBED IN QUESTIONS 1-7
APPLY TO DIFFERENT AREAS IN THE UNIT (make a rough sketch to help you decide). Use
the following table to identify the appropriate class to use for the rating system if you have several
HGM classes present within your wetland. NOTE: Use this table only if the class that is
recommended in the second column represents 10% or more ofthe total area of the wetland unit
being rated. If the area ofthe class listed in column 2 is less than 10% of the unit; classify the
wetland using the class that represents more than 90% of the total area.
a e- nncre
Depressional + Riverine along stream within boundary
De ressional + Lake-frin re
Salt Water Tidal Fringe and any other class offreshwater
wetland
If you are unable still to determine which of the above criteria apply to your wetland, or if you
have more than 2 HGM classes within a wetland boundary, classify the wetland as Depressional
for the rating.
Wetland Rating Form ~ western Washington
version 2
4
August 2004
Wetland name or
D 1.1 Characteristics of surface water flows out of the wetland:
Unit is a depression with no surface water leaving it (no outlet) points = 3
Unit has an intermittently flowing, OR highly constricted permanently flowing outlet points = 2
Unit has an unconstricted, or slightly constricted, surface outlet (permanently flowing) points = I
Unit is a "flat" depression (Q. 7 on key), or in the Flats class, with permanent surface outflow and
no obvious natural outlet and/or outlet is a man-made ditch points = I
(If ditch is not permanently flowing treat unit as "intermittently flowing")
Provide
S 1.2 The soil 2 inches below the surface (or dufflayer) is clay or organic
definitions}
YES points = 4
NO oints = 00
D 1.3 Characteristics of persistent vegetation (emergent, shrub, and/or forest Cowardin class) Figure_
Wet]and has persistent, ungrazed, vegetation> = 95% of area points = 5
Wetland has persistent, ungrazed, vegetation> = 1/2 of area points = 3
Wetland has persistent, ungrazed vegetation> = 1110 of area points = ]
Wetland has persistent, ungrazed vegetation <]/10 of area points = 0
Ma of Cowardin va etation classes
D].4 Characteristics of seasonal ponding or inundation.
This is the area (if the wetland unit that is pondedfor at least 2 months, but dries out
sometime during the year. Do not count the area that is permanently ponded. Estimate
area as the average condition 5 out (if 10 yrs.
Area seasonally ponded is> Y:, total area of wetland
Area seasonally ponded is> I;' total area of wetland
Area seasonally ponded is < I;' total area of wetland
D 1. Does the wetland unit have the potential to improve water quality?
D
D
D
D
D
D
Total for D 1
D
D 2. Does the wetland unit have the opportunity to improve water quality?
Answer YES if you know or believe there are pollutants in groundwater or surface water
coming into the wetland that would otherwise reduce water quality in streams, Jakes or
groundwater downgradient from the wetland. Note which afthe following conditions
provide the sources of pollutants. A unit may have pollutants comingfrom several
sourpJ?S, but any single source would qualifY as opportunity.
.K.. Grazing in the wetland or within 150 ft
- Untreated storm water discharges to wetland
-;:/'Tilled fields or orchards within 150 ft of wetland
- A stream or culvert discharges into wetland that drains developed areas, residential areas,
farmed fields, roads, or clear-cut logging
Residential, urban areas, golf courses are within 150 ft of wetland
Wetland is fed by groundwater high in phosphorus or nitrogen
Other
YES multi lier is 2 NO multi lier is I
TOTAL - Water Quality Functions Multiply the score from DI by D2
Add score to table on . 1
Wetland Rating Form - western Washington
version 2
5
August 2004
Figure _
3
I
Figure _
I
(see p. 44)
multiplier
:2
/6
Wetlaild name or numberkee+-et!i
D 3. Does the wetland unit have the potential to reduce flooding and erosion?
D
D 3.1 Characteristics of surface water flows out of the wetland unit
Unit is a depression with no surface water leaving it (no outlet) points = 4
Unit has an intermittently flo\\,ing, OR highly constricted permanently flowing outlet points = 2
Unit is a "flat" depression (Q. 7 on key), or in the Flats class, with permanent surface outflow and
no obvious natural outlet andlor outlet is a man-made ditch points = J
(If ditch is not permanentlyflowing treat unit as "intermittently flowing")
Unit has an unconstricted, or sli htl constricted, surface outlet ermanentl
D 3.2 Depth of storage during wet periods
Estimate the height of ponding above the bottom of the outlet. For units with no outlet
measure from the surface of permanent water or deepest part (if dry).
Marks of ponding are 3 ft or more above the surface or bottom of outlet points = 7
The wetland is a "headwater" wetland" points = 5
Marks of ponding between 2 ft to < 3 ft from surface or bottom of outlet points = 5
Marks are at least 0.5 ft to < 2 ft from surface or bottom of outlet points = 3
Unit is flat (yes to Q. 2 or Q. 7 on key) but has small depressions on the surface that trap
water points = I
Marks of ondin less than 0.5 ft oints = 0
D 3.3 Contribution of wetland unit to storage in the watershed
Estimate the ratio of the area of upstream basin contributing surface water to the wetland
to the area of the wetland unit itself:
The area of the basin is less than 10 times the area of unit
The area of the basin is 10 to 100 times the area ofthe unit
The area of the basin is more than 100 times the area of the unit
Entire unit is in the FLATS class
Total for D 3
D
ints = 0
D
D
D
points = 5
points = 3
points = 0
oints =' 5
Add the points in the boxes above
D 4. Does the wetland unit have the opportunity to reduce flooding and erosion?
Answer YES if the unit is in a location in the watershed where the flood storage, or
reduction in water velocity, it provides helps protect downstream property and aquatic
resources from flooding or excessive andlor erosive flows. Answer NO if the water
coming into the wetland is controlled by a structure such as flood gate, tide gate, flap
valve, reservoir etc. OR you estimate that more than 90% of the water in the wetland is
from groundwater in areas where damaging groundwater flooding does not occur.
Note which afthe fill/owing indicators of opportunity apply.
Wetland is in a headwater of a river or stream that has flooding problems
Wetland drains to a river or stream that has flooding problems
Wetland has no outlet and impounds surface runoff water that might otherwise
flow into a river or stream that has problems
-X
D
multi lier is 2 NO multi lier is
TOTAL - Hydrologic Functions Multiply the score from D 3 by D 4
Add score to table on p. 1
Wetland Rating Form - western Washington
version 2
6
August 2004
(see p.46)
I _.11_
(see p. 49)
multiplier
..., -'7
LL
Wetland name or number
H 1. Does the wetland unit have the potential to provide habitat for many species?
H 1.1 Vegetation structure (see p. 72)
Check the types of vegetation classes present (as defined by Cowardin)- Size threshold for each
class is Y. acre or more than 10% of the area if unit is smaller than 2.5 acres.
_Aquatic bed
-lLEmergent plants
__5crub/shrflb (areas where shrubs have >30% cover) /
_Forested (areas where trees have'>30% cover)
If the unit has aforested class check if:
_The forested class has 3 out of5 strata (canopy, sub-canopy, shrubs, herbaceous,
moss/ground-cover) that each cover 20% within the forested polygon
Add the number of vegetation structures that qualifY. If you have:
4 structures or more
3 structures
2 structures
I structure
Figure _
Map of Cowardin vegetation classes
points = 4
points = 2
points = I
oints = 0
o
Figure _
H 1.2. Hydroperiods (see p. 73)
Check the types of water regimes (hydro periods) present within the wetland. The water
regime has to cover more than 10% of the wetland or Y. acre to count. (see text for
descriptions of hydroperiods)
------"permanently flooded or inundated 4 or more types present
~ Seasonally flo()ded or inundated 3 types present
Occasionally flooded or inundated 2 types present
_Z Saturated only I type present
_ Permanently flowing stream or river in, or adjacent to, the wetland
_ Seasonally flowing stream in, or adjacent to, the wetland
_ Lake-fringe wetland = 2 points
_Freshwater tidal wetland = 2 points
H 1.3. Richness of Plant Species (see p. 75)
Count the number of plant species in the wetland that cover at least 10 ttZ. (different patches
of the same species can be combined to meet the size threshold)
You do not have to name the species.
Do not include Eurasian Mil/oil, reed canarygrass, purple loosestrife,
If you counted: > 19 species
List species below if you want to: 5 - 19 species
< 5 species
points = 3
points = 2
point = 1
points = 0
Map of hydroperiods
/
Canadian Thistle
points = 2
points = I
points = 0
I
Total for page ~
Wetland Rating Form - western Washington
version 2
13
August 2004
(> 1
Wetland name or number 1( <((:J<2/'-
H 104. Interspersion of habitats (see p. 76)
Decide from the diagrams below whether interspersion between Cowardin vegetation
classes (described in H 1.1), or the classes and unvegetated areas (can include open water or
mudflats) is high, medium, low, or none.
oCQ)@
None = 0 points
Low = I point
Moderate = 2 points
/
[riparian braided channels)
= 3 points
NOTE: If you have four or more classes or three vegetation classes and open water
the ratin is alwa s "hi h". Use map of Cowardin ve etation classes
H 1.5. Special Habitat Features: (see p. 77)
Check the habitat features that are present in the wetland. The number of checks is the
number of points you put into the next column.
___Large, downed, woody debris within the wetland (>4in. diameter and 6 ft long).
_Standing snags (diameter at the bottom> 4 inches) in the wetland
_Undercut banks are present for at least 6.6 ft (2m) and/or overhanging vegetation extends at
least 3.3 ft (J m) over a stream (or ditch) in, or contiguous with the unit, for at least 33 ft
(10m)
_Stable steep banks of fine material that might be used by beaver or muskrat for denning
(>30degree slope) OR signs of recent beaver activity are present (cut shrubs or trees that
. / have not yet turned grey/brown)
_-,LAt least Y. acre of thin-stemmed persistent vegetation or woody branches are present in areas
that are permanently or seasonally inundated. (.~tructures for egg-laying by amphibians)
.--z Invasive plants cover less than 25% of the wetland area in each stratum of plants
NOTE: The 20% stated in early printings of the manual on page 78 is an error.
H 1. TOTAL Score - potential for providing habitat I
Add the scores rom H1.J, Hi.2, HI.3, HI.4, Hi.5
Comments
Wetland Rating Form - western Washington
version 2
14
August 2004
igure _
;;
J-.
2
" I
____I
Wetland name or number
;~?
H 2. Does the wetland unit have the opportunity to provide habitat for many species?
H 2.1 Buffers (see p. 80)
Choose the description that best represents condition of buffer of wetland unit. The highest scoring
criterion that applies to the wetland is to be used in the rating. See text for definition of
"undisturbed. "
- 100 m (330ft) of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas, rocky areas, or open water >95%
of circumference. No structures are within the undisturbed part of buffer. (relatively
undisturbed also means no-grazing, no landscaping, no daily human use) Points = 5
- 100 m (330 ft) of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas, rocky areas, or open water >
50% circumference. Points = 4
- 50 m (170ft) of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas, rocky areas, or open water >95%
circumference. Points = 4
- 100 m (330ft) of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas, rocky areas, or open water> 25%
circumference, . Points = 3
- 50 m (170ft) of relatively undisturbed vegetated areas, rocky areas, or open water for>
50% circumference. Points = 3
If buffer does not meet any of the criteria above
No paved areas (except paved trails) or buildings within 25 m (80ft) of wetland > 95%
circumference. Light to moderate grazing, or lawns are OK. Points = 2
- No paved areas or buildings within 50m of wetland for >50% circumference.
Light to moderate grazing, or lawns are OK. Points = 2
- Heavy grazing in buffer. Points = I
- Vegetated buffers are <2m wide (6.6ft) for more than 95% of the circumference (e.g. tilled
fields, paving, basalt bedrock extend to edge of wetland Points = O.
- Buffer does not meet any of the criteria above. Points = 1
Aerial ohoto showina buffers
H 2.2 Corridors and Connections (see p. 81)
H 2.2.1 Is the wetland part of a relatively undisturbed and unbroken vegetated corridor
(either riparian or upland) that is at least 150 ft wide, has at least 30% cover of shrubs, forest
or native undisturbed prairie, that connects to estuaries, other wetlands or undisturbed
uplands that are at least 250 acres in size? (dams in riparian corridors, heavily used gravel
roads,paved roads, are considered breaks in the corridor).
YES = 4 points (go to H 2.3) NO = go to H 2.2.2
H 2.2.2 Is the wetland part of a relatively undisturbed and unbroken vegetated corridor
(either riparian or upland) that is at least 50ft wide, has at least 30% cover of shrubs or
forest, and connects to estuaries, other wetlands or undisturbed uplands that are at least 25
acres in size? OR a Lake-fringe wetland, if it does not have an undisturbed corridor as in
the question above?
YES = 2 points (go to H 2.3) NO = H 2.2.3
H 2.2.3 (s the wetland:
within 5 mi (8km) of a brac~ish or salt water estuary OR
v" within 3 mi of a large field or pasture (>40 acres) OR
within 1 mi of a lake greater than 20 acres?
YES = I point NO = 0 points
Figure _
.....
c:...
/
'"
Total forpage~_
Wetland Rating Form - western Washington
version 2
15
August 2004
/; t
Wetland name or number r.e,"!kv
H 2.3 Near or adiacent to other priority habitats listed by WDFW (see p. 82)
Which ofthe following priority habitats are within 330ft (100m) of the wetland unit? NOTE: the
connections do not have to be relatively undisturbed.
These are DFW definitions. Check with your local DFW biologist if there are any questions.
_Riparian: The area adjacent to aquatic systems with flowing water that contains elements of
both aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems which mutually influence each other.
_Aspen Stands: Pure or mixed stands of aspen greater than 0.8 ha (2 acres).
_Cliffs: Greater than 7.6 m (25 ft) high and occurring below 5000 ft.
_Old-growth forests: (Old-growth west of Cascade crest) Stands of at least 2 tree species,
forming a multi-layered canopy with occasional small openings; with at least 20 treeslha (8
trees/acre) > 81 cm (32 in) dbh or> 200 years of age.
_Mature forests: Stands with average diameters exceeding 53 cm (21 in) dbh; crown cover
may be less that 100%; crown cover may be less that 100%; decay, d'1cadence, numbers of
snags, and quantity of large downed material is generally less than that found in old-
growth; 80 - 200 years old west of the Cascade crest.
_Prairies: Relatively undisturbed areas (as indicated by dominance of native plants) where
grasses and/or forbs form the natural climax plant community.
_Talus: Homogenous areas of rock rubble ranging in average size 0.15 - 2.0 m (0.5 - 6.5 ft),
composed of basalt, andesite, and/or sedimentary rock, including riprap slides and mine
tailings. May be associated with cliffs.
_Caves: A naturally occurring cavity, recess, void, or system of interconnected passages
~Oregon white Oak: Woodlands Stands of pure oak or oak/conifer associations where
canopy coverage of the oak component ofthe stand is 25%.
_ Urban Natural Open Space: A priority species resides within or is adjacent to the open
space and uses it for breeding and/or regular feeding; and/or the open space functions as a
corridor connecting other priority habitats, especially those that would otherwise be
isolated; and/or the open space is an isolated remnant of natural habitat larger than 4 ha (10
acres) and is surrounded by urban development.
_Estuary/Estuary-like: Deepwater tidal habitats and adjacent tidal wetlands, usually semi-
enclosed by land but with open, partly obstructed or sporadic access to the open ocean, and
in which ocean water is at least occasionally diluted by freshwater runoff from the land.
The salinity may be periodically increased above that of the open ocean by evaporation.
Along some low-energy coastlines there is appreciable dilution of sea water. Estuarine
habitat extends upstream and landward to where ocean-derived salts measure less than
O.5ppt. during the period of average annual low flow. Includes both estuaries and lagoons.
_ MarinelEstuarine Shorelines: Shorelines include the intertidal and subtidal zones of
beaches, and may also include the backshore and adjacent components ofthe terrestrial
landscape (e.g., cliffs, snags, mature trees, dunes, meadows) that are important to shoreline
associated fish and wildlife and that contribute to shoreline function (e.g., sand/rock/log
recruitment, nutrient contribution, erosion control).
If wetland has 3 or more priority habitats = 4 points
If wetland has 2 priority habitats = 3 points
If wetland has 1 priority habitat = 1 point No habitats = 0 points
Note: All vegetated wetlands are by definition a priority habitat but are not included in this ^
list. Nearbv wetlands are addressed in auestion H 2.4) \...-->
Wetland Rating Form - western Washington
version 2
16
August 2004
Wetland name or number
H 2.4 Wetland Landscape (choose the one description of the landscape around the wetland that
bestjits)(see p. 84)
There are at least 3 other wetlands within 'h mile, and the connections between them are
relatively undisturbed (light grazing between wetlands OK, as is lake shore with some
boating, but connections should NOT be bisected by paved roads, fill, fields, or other
development. points = 5
The wetland is Lake-fringe on a lake with little disturbance and there are 3 other lake-fringe
wetlands within '12 mile points = 5
There are at least 3 other wetlands within 'h mile, BUT the connections between them are
disturbed points = 3
The wetland is Lake-fringe on a lake with disturbance and there are 3 other lake-fringe
wetland within 'h mile points = 3
There is at least J wetland within 'h mile. points = 2
There are no wetlands within 'h mile. points = 0
1---
-----
H 2. TOTAL Score - opportunity for providing habitat I S I
Add the scores from H2.1,H2.2. H2.3. H2.4
-----
TOTAL for H I from page 14 6.
-----
Total Score for Habitat Functions - add the points for H 1, H 2 and record the result on JI
p. ]
Wetland Rating Form - western Washington
version 2
17
August 2004
Wetland name or number
CATEGORIZATION BASED ON SPECIAL CHARACTERISTICS
Please determine if the wetland meets the attributes described below and circle the
appropriate answers and Category.
Wetland Type
Check offany criteria that apply to the wetland. Circle the Category when the
appropriate criteria are met.
SC 1.0 Estuarine wetlands (see p. 86)
Does the wetland unit meet the following criteria for Estuarine wetlands?
- The dom inant water regime is tidal,
- Vegetated, and
- With a salinity greater than 0.5 ppt.
YES = Go to SC 1.1 NO V
SC 1.1 Is the wetland unit within a National Wildlife Refuge, National Park,
National Estuary Resewe, Natural Area Preserve, State Park or Educational,
Environmental, or Scientific Reserve designated under WAC 332-30-151?
YES = Category I NO go to SC 1.2
SC 1.2 Is the wetland unit at least 1 acre in size and meets at least two of the
following three conditions? YES = Category I NO = Category II
- The wetland is relatively undisturbed (has no diking, ditching, filling,
cultivation, grazing, and has less than 10% cover of non-native plant
species. If the non-native Spartina spp. are the only species that cover
more than 10% of the wetland, then the wetland should be given a dual
rating (I/II). The area of Spartina would be rated a Category n while the
relatively undisturbed upper marsh with native species would be a
Category I. Do not, however, exclude the area ofSpartina in
determining the size threshold of I acre.
- At least 3/4 of the landward edge of the wetland has a 100 ft buffer of
shrub, forest, or un-grazed or un-mowed grassland.
- The wetland has at least 2 of the following features: tidal channels,
depressions with open water, or contiguous freshwater wetlands.
Wetland Rating Form - western Washington
version 2
18
August 2004
Category
Cat. I
Cat. I
Cat. II
Dual
rating
IIII
Wetland name or number
SC 2.0 Natural Heritage Wetlands (seep. 87)
Natural Heritage wetlands have been identified by the Washington Natural Heritage
ProgramlDNR as either high quality undisturbed wetlands or wetlands that support
state Threatened, Endangered, or Sensitive plant species.
SC 2.1 Is the wetland unit being rated in a Section/Township/Range that contains a
Natural Heritage wetland? (this question is used to screen out most sites
before you need to contact WNHP/DNR)
Slf/R information from Appendix D __ or accessed from WNHP/DNR web site _
YES_ - contact WNHP/DNR (see p. 79) and go to SC 2.2
NO V
SC 2.2 Has DNR identified the wetland as a high quality undisturbed wetland or as
or as a site with state threatened or endangered plant species?
YES = Category I NO _not a Heritage Wetland
SC 3.0 Bogs (seep. 87)
Does the wetland unit (or any part of the unit) meet both the criteria for soils and
vegetation in bogs? Use the key be/ow to identifY !f the wet/and is a bog. If you
answer yes you will still need to rate the wetland based on its functions.
I. Does the unit have organic soil horizons (i.e. layers of organic soil), either
peats or mucks, that compose 16 inches or more of the first 32 inches of the
soil profile? (See Appendix B for a field key to identify organic soils)? Yes-
go to Q. 3 No - go to Q. 2
2. Does the unit have organic soils, either peats or mucks that are less than 16
inches deep over bedrock, or an impermeable hardpan such as clay or
volcanic ash, or that are floating on a lake or pond?
Yes - go to Q. 3 No - Is not a bog for purpose of rating
3. Does the unit have more than 70% cover of mosses at ground level, AND
other plants, if present, consist of the "bog" species listed in Table 3 as a
significant component of the vegetation (more than 30% of the total shrub
and herbaceous cover consists of species in Table 3)?
Yes - Is a bog for purpose of rating No - go to Q. 4
NOTE: [fyou are uncertain about the extent of mosses in the understory
you may substitute that criterion by measuring the pH ofthe water that
seeps into a hole dug at least 16" deep. If the pH is less than 5.0 and the
"bog" plant species in Table 3 are present, the wetland is a bog.
1. Is the unit forested (> 30% cover) with sitka spruce, subalpine fir, western
red cedar, western hemlock, lodgepole pine, quaking aspen, Englemann's
spruce, or western white pine, WITH any of the species (or combination of
species) on the bog species plant list in Table 3 as a significant component
of the ground cover (> 30% coverage of the total shrub/herbaceous cover)?
2. YES = Category I No_ Is not a bog for purpose of rating
Wetland Rating Form - western Washington
version 2
19
August 2004
Cat. I
Cat. I
,., I
Wetland name or number /<petey' (;p
SC 4.0 Forested Wetlands (.~ee p. 90)
Does the wetland unit have at least 1 acre of forest that meet one of these criteria for
the Department of Fish and Wildlife's forests as priority habitats? Jfyou answer yes
you will still need to rate the wetland based on its junctions.
- Old-growth forests: (west of Cascade crest) Stands of at least two tree species,
forming a multi-layered canopy with occasional small openings; with at least 8
trees/acre (20 treeslhectare) that are at least 200 years of age OR have a
diameter at breast height (dbh) of32 inches (8l cm) or more.
NOTE: The criterion for dbh is based on measurements for upland forests.
Two-hundred year old trees in wetlands will often have a smaller dbh
because their growth rates are often slower. The DFW criterion is and "OR"
so old-growth forests do not necessarily have to have trees of this diameter.
- Mature forests: (west of the Cascade Crest) Stands where the largest trees are
80 - 200 years old OR have average diameters (dbh) exceeding 21 inches
(53cm); crown cover may be less that 100%; decay, decadence, numbers of
snags, and quantity of large downed material is generally less than that found
in old-growth.
YES = Category I NO. /not a forested wetland with special characteristics
SC 5.0 Wetlands in Coastal Lagoons (.~ee p. 91)
Does the wetland meet all of the following criteria ofa wetland in a coastal lagoon?
- The wetland lies in a depression adjacent to marine waters that is wholly
or partially separated from marine waters by sandbanks, gravel banks,
shingle, or, less frequently, rocks
- The lagoon in which the wetland is located contains surface water that is
saline or brackish (> 0.5 ppt) during most of the year in at least a portion
of the lagoon (needs to be measured o/ar the bottom)
YES = Go to SC 5.1 NO L not a wetland in a coastal lagoon
SC 5.l Does the wetland meets all of the following three conditions?
- The wetland is relatively undisturbed (has no diking, ditching, filling,
cultivation, grazing), and has less than 20% cover of invasive plant
species (see list of invasive species on p. 74).
- At least % of the landward edge of the wetland has a 100 ft buffer of
shrub, forest, or un-grazed or un-mowed grassland.
- The wetland is larger than lIIO acre (4350 square feet)
YES = Category I NO = Category II
Wetland Rating Form - western Washington
version 2
20
August 2004
Cat. I
Cat. I
Cat. II
I)
Wetland name or number f'{~r;;I{ Qf10D
SC 6.0 Interdunal Wetlands (seep. 93)
Is the wetland unit west of the 1889 line (also called the Western Boundary of Upland
Ownership or WBUO)?
YES - go to SC 6.1 NO Vnot an interdunal wetland for rating
lfyou answer yes you will still need to rate the wetland based on its
functions.
In practical terms that means the following geographic areas:
. Long Beach Peninsula- lands west of SR 103
. Grayland-Westport- lands west ofSR 105
. Ocean Shores-Copalis- lands west ofSR 115 and SR 109
SC 6.1 Is the wetland one acre or larger, or is it in a mosaic of wetlands that is
once acre or larger?
YES = Category II NO - go to SC 6.2
SC 6.2 Is the unit between 0.1 and I acre, or is it in a mosaic of wetlands that is
between 0.1 and I acre?
YES = Category III
Cat. II
Cat. III
Wetland Rating Form - western Washington
version 2
21
August 2004
APPENDIX C
DRAWINGS AND MAPS OF SITE
-r - - - - - - - _N880 26~ ~5~ _ _ ~2~.~4+ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ~
, ~I
, ~
! ~;
.r- ~ r
~i
+---t
/ - ,
N880 26' 31" W ~
54.96' re I
...-,
'.'
"
I .:: / Wetland
~,' ~025oaes/) \;
,,// 0'<" ~/)
, ~e'" <
~ ~Q ~11P ,//>
,/ i 0(j~~Q ()'//,/ 0<(<(~?-
Wetland I ,~c::,~ /' ..~Q~'?>
\ i c,v' // ~"~. .
! ~~;r/
r
1
,
I
w'
~/
(')
"',
~ ' N880 26' 57" W
ci5 J / 54.96'
+--+.
I
,
,
I
Uplands
'2
'0
N/~
<c!,w
~,t;
"'jw
w'W
_ , ::::l
b 2
~Iw
~,~
'"
V3'~
/8
,0
,
Co,
il
,
,
+
.t--- - - S88?~ 49" E _ _ 304.9~ _ _ _ _ _+
sl
- ,
~,
~I
~,
en,
I
,
,
I
,
,
I
~/
~,
('),
LEGEND
Parcel Boundary - - - - - - - -
Vegetated Wetland boundary
Pond Boundary nn.nnnnnnn.n..
Buffer Boundary ... - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
wi
- ,
*,
~I
N
0'
en,
,
,
~ - - - - - S88048'03~ - -333.37'- - - - - ~
FIGURE 1
DATE
9/16/08
DRAWN BY
Kim Meehan-Rauls!
DATE
7/18/07
FILE NAME
Reeler
999008303
WETLAND
C~TICALAREADRAVWNG
LOCATION DESC~PTlON TAX
Located in a Portion IDENTIFICATION
of the Sec. 04, no NUMBER
N, Rl W, WM, Jefferson 999008303
County, Washington
PROPERTY ~ ~
OWNER OR 3i:91 :a i ~
CUENT ~ ~ p _
- iijEr~
Eric & Casey Reeler ...,..., =e ~ ~ ~
6532 41St Ave. SW ~ f81~!i ~)>
Seattle, V\A98136 ~ ~ ::I ~
15
SCALE: 1" = 110'
0' 60' 120'
,- J
ALL DISTANCES ARE ~
HO~ONTALLENGTHS
DRAWING IS NOT A NOR T
LEGAL LAND SURVEY
REVISED DRAWING
BY
W David Loggy
..
FIGURE 2
FOREST PRACTICE ACTIVITY MAP
TOWNSHIP 30 NORTH HALF 0, RANGE 1 WEST (W.M.) HALF 0, SECTION 4
POND LOCATED ON PARCEL 999008303
f\
I
f 11002160
,..-t ~
I ~~
I
t
f
Location of P d.
1100216
N
140
+~
110027/
1- ..
11002142
+
F.3trangen, Lake
N +N
Saturday, September 20, 2008 6:22:12 PM
NAD 83
Contour Interval: 40 Feet
http://fortress. wa.gov/servletlcom.esrLesrimap.Esrimap?ServiceName=fpars&ClientV ersio... 9/20/2008