HomeMy WebLinkAbout2961-16
'.
-
~
~
@
S,MP Update 2
Jefferson' Conn
A uacDlture
f>
"S
,.....
~
\Xl
QC;)
,
'<~ ~
~-
,.e
<~
~
<::;;;:...
1
~
l
~
~
'1
d\JV'
~ r-.; .,.;
- ~ a::.
o
,
,
Washington State Shoreline Master Program Guidelines
WAC 173-26-241 Shoreline Uses. (3)(b) Aquaculture.
Aquaculture is the culture or farming of food fish, shellfish, or other aquatic plants and
animals. This activity, is of statewide interest. Properly managed, it can result in long-
t r short-term benefit and can protect. the resources and ecology of the
s re '. Aquaculture;is. dependent .on th u~e of the water area and, when
. tent with control. Ilutionand prevention of damage to the
ment, .re e of the """ater .' area: Local overnment should
consl er local ecological conditions and provide Ii oi'ions to assure
appropriate compatible types of aquaculture for the I . s necessary to
assure no net loss of ecological functions.
Potential locations for aquaculture are relatively restrictt'o'~p~elfic ,requirements
for water quality, temperature, flows, oxygen content, adjacent land uses, wind
protection, commercial navigation, and, in marine waters, salinity. The technology
associated with some forms of present-day aquaculture is still in its formative stages
and experimental. Local shoreline master programs should therefore recognize the
necessity for some latitude in the development of this use as well as its potential
impact on exi~tl uses and natural sY~~E3ms
Iture should not be permitted in areas where it would result in a net loss
eological. functions, adversely impact eelgrass' and' macroalgae, or~
significantly conflic .tth navigati9n and other water-dependent uses.
Aquacultural facilities should be design'ed and located'so as not to spread disease to
native aquatic life, establish ....nonnative species which cause significant
ecological impacts, or significanU . impact the aesthetic qualities of the shoreline.
Impacts to ecological funcf hall be mitigated according to the mitigation
_ _ _.. . _ ._ _ _ _I _ _ _ ._: ,_ _ _I :._ 'A' ^ ""
.l.,
Jefferson County Vision Statement
W eenvision Jefferson County as a balanced,
stainable~community with. economic
~port1J -t- cODlepotentialthat allows
personal independence. Where p
educational opportunities exist and areal
economy. Where the community acce s.. 'a ce ailllevel of
growth and develoent are healthy and necessary to maintain
our quality of life. ere the enjoyment of a rural lifestyle is
allowed without the necessity of urban services. Where growth
is encouraged where apprQ,priate infrastructure exists or is
planned to exist, thus enabling urban and rural lifestyles to
coexist. Whet' ommt:l~i>ty is engaged with their elected
leadership to accept re p.sibility for contributing to the
solution of communit roblems.
'-
Aquaculture Production
MAINE
'64.1
MILlI.ON
DOL1.ARS
WASM PKlT0't4
:$1'1\1'11:
12. :l
MILLJON
OOLl:.A'U~
CDNtllECTIOUT
12
MIU!,11)1f! .
I)Oll..1lRS
WUlfllNh\
11
MII,t,ll)k
I)Oll..1lRS
FlCl R:iD-A
9~5
MIU!,11)1f!
I)Oll..1lRS
Clean 'Water is the lifeblood of
shellfish in Puget Sound.
They filter large quantities of
'Water as they feed and can
also accumulate bacteria...
viruses" and other
contanUnants. Safe, edible
clams... oysters.. and other
bivalve shellfish are evidence
of good 'Water quality.
Contaminated shel.lfish reflect
water quality problems and
can harm the people and
animals that eat them.
Hood Canal
Dissolved Oxygen Problems
Dissolved oxygen is crucial to sustain fish
and aquatic liie, "W"hich "'''breathe'''' i~ for
survival. In Hood Canal, 10'W levels of
dissolved oxygen have resulted in fi...h kills
and gro.......,ing udead zones. n While natural
factors and'W"at"cr circulation playa role,
nitrogen is the main pollutant causing 10",
dissolved oxygen levels. Excess nitrogen
levels cause excess algae gro_th. As the
algae die and decay, it robs the water of
dissolved oxygen and smothers marine
life. Nitrogen pollution comes from
'YJ'asteVV"ater treatInent plant discharges..-
septic systems, some farming activities,
and fertilizer and pet Vtlaste runoff from
home lavvns and gardens~
Toxic Cleanup Sites
o clean ups in progress
a\Naiting cleanup
When toxic pollutants get
into Puget Sound, they can
settle to the bottom, then
"loVork. their 'W"ay into the food
chain and acc\ln\.ulate,
ultimately threatening the
entire ecosystem. Today,
more than 5,700 acres of
underwater lands in Puget
Sound and Hood Canal
exceed toxic level standards.
Ecology is in the process 01
cleaning up 553 sites located
'Within one-half mile of Puget
Sound and has identified 115
more upland and aquatic
toxic sites -waiting to be
cleaned up.
South Puget Sound
DissolvedOxygen Problems
Ecology is concerned that depleted levels
of dissolved oxygen in some areas of South
Puget Sound could trigger the same W'ater-
quality crisis bedeviling areaS in Hood
Car..-.l. Recent studies have revealed loW'
levels of dissolved oxygen levels in several
key marine bodies - particularly Budd,
Case, and Carr inlets.
. Paved Surfaces
When land is .
developed, surfaces
get paved. over
creating a hard
barrier that keeps
rain and melting
snow from soaking
into the b,7Yound.
Instead", water runs
off roads, parking
lots, rooftops, and
other hard surfaces~
As this
~stormw-atcr# flo'VVs
across developed
areas, it carries oil.,
grease, yard and
garden che.rnicals..
bacteria... and other
pollutants that get
into Puget Sound.
,r',
If you need this publication in an alternate formaC please call the Communication and Education office at 360-407-7000.
Persons vvith hearing loss can call 711 for Washington Relay Service. Persons "",ith a speech disability can call 877-833-6341.
Ecology
..
AqJla~ulture in Jefferson Co.
ounty on PugetS
e." $22 Million industry
· Sensitive to water quality an ..
sedimentatio
· Local food - low carbo footprint
e Loc. employmenf.
e . Many sma1t>upera:tDFs
Geoduck
Total
Specific
"
rom Representative SMPs
Location
Studies
Wse Operations &
Proofs
't'0.6,
I J~f!~r$on.Co. 12
King qo. . 2
Port Townsend 1
Pierce;Co. 2
-~.
Snohomish Co. 3
hurston Co. 1
x
X
1
73
-~~
,10 I
16
9
Aquaculture Regulations
Snohomish Co. SMP (2006)
Same use r.ulations as ports and water-related industry
Aquacllltu e areas. are protected from degradation by other
activities on adjacent upland or within one mile
ate so.as to .' decomme:rcial traffic in shipping lanes
y . f aU be.open to the. public to the
3ximum e nt. e
5. ..i\IIark site boundaries so public water use
interference
6. Shall control nuisance factors such as odor, noise, degradation of
water and beach qualitY
7. Only boats can be storedJn the shoreline environment
8. Shall not cause a net loss of ecolo .cal functions or adversely
impact. rass and macroalg~e
8
Aijua~ultureQuestion:
sle vv
i'''fix or prevent ,and vvb
supportjng e,m(lellee '~as
consideled1.