HomeMy WebLinkAbout2961-52
Cc/ IYl f'r ,
\? {" I u~'-€.b.
Michelle M~36~~~ltr
V;0{
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Michelle McConnell
Tuesday, January 20, 2009 10:30 AM
'Tom McCay'
RE: SMP re Port Ludlow
@
Comments received - thank you.
As we are now in an open public comment period (12/3/08 -1/30/09) on our Preliminary Draft Shoreline
Master Proaram proposal for Comprehensive Plan and Development Regulation amendments, your comments
will be forwarded to the Planning Commission for their consideration. Public Comments are posted online at
http://www.co.iefferson.wa.us/commdevelopment/ShorelineUpdate200S-9.htm#PublicComments.No
reply is needed in response to this message.
In response to your comments, the current SMP is an appendix to the development agreement and only applies to PLA
property. Once the development agreement expires and a new one is negotiated, the new SMP may be in effect for
PLA property. Other 'non-PLA' properties in the Port Ludlow area would be subject to the new SMP upon adoption.
<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>
Michelle McConnell, Associate Planner - LRP Lead
Shoreline Master Program (SMP) Update Project Manager
Direct: 360.379.4484
Web: http://www.co.iefferson.wa.us/commdevelopmentlShorelinePlanning.htm
NEW OFFICE HOURS: 9 a - 4:30 p Monday - Thursday; Closed on Friday
<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>
NOTE: All e-mail sent to this address will be received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and are subject to Public Disclosure under Chapter 42.56 RCW.
From: Tom McCay [mailto:temccay@cablespeed.com]
Sent: Monday, January 19, 2009 10:02 AM
To: Michelle McConnell
Subject: SMP re Port Ludlow
Good Morning, Michelle--I was told late last week that the SMP will not apply to Port Ludlow for ten years because of the
Development Agreement taking precedence. That doesn't seem to make sense to me in that the Development
Agreement is between the County and the Developer and, in reading the Agreement, I find no finite references to
Shoreline Management. Neither do the Master Declaration for South Bay or, to my knowledge, any of the Supplemental
Declarations. Can you help me out in clarifying this peculiar situation? Why would Port Ludlow be excluded from a
County ordinance when the Development Agreement applies to activities of the Developer?
Tom McCay
437-2156
1