Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2961-268a GlY\1'1- \~\p Michelle McConnell From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Mackie, Sandy (Perkins Coie) [AMackie@perkinscoie.com] Wednesday, January 28, 20094:42 PM David W. Johnson; Michelle McConnell; Stacie Hoskins; Rentz, Karen peckassoc@comcastnet; Garth Mann; Rentz, Karen (Perkins Coie) RE: SMP questions ?Auf I would like to be part of the meetings as the issues are critical to the pleasant Harbor program--please check schedules with Karen Rentz my secretary who keeps my calendar. Sandy Mackie I Perkins Coie LLP PHONE: 206,359.8653 From: David W. Johnson (mailto:dwjohnson@co.jefferson.wa.us] Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2009 2:51 PM To: Michelle McConnell; Stacie Hoskins; Mackie, Sandy (Perkins Coie) Cc: peckassoc@comcast.net; Garth Mann Subject: RE: SMP questions Sandy, I'm scheduling a meeting with Craig Peck, Jeff Stewart with DOE, and Michelle to discuss these issues. You are welcome to attend. I'll let you know when. From: Michelle McConnell Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2009 12:22 PM To: David W. Johnson; Stacie Hoskins Subject: FW: SMP questions Please assist me in a response to Sandy <><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><> Michelle McConnell, Associate Planner - LRP Lead Shoreline Master Program (SMP) Update Project Manager Direct: 360.379.4484 Web: htl;p:/ /www.co.jefferson.wa.us/commdevelopment/ShorelinePlanning.htm NEW OFFICE HOURS: 9 a - 4:30 p Monday - Thursday; Closed on Friday <><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><> NOTE: AlIlHIIail sent to this address will be received by the Jefferson County ...mail system and are subject to Public Disclosure under Chapter 42.56 RCW. From: Mackie, Sandy (Perkins Coie) (mailto: ] Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2009 10:51 AM To: Michelle McConnell Cc: Rentz, Karen (Perkins Coie); Rentz, Karen (Perkins Coie) Subject: RE: SMP questions 1 Thank you. It does appear that a "mixed use" project associated with a marina, where the marina store, yacht club, showers and related facilities were on the ground floor, and condominiums and apartments were on the upper floor, that such a facility could be constructed within the 150 foot buffer, so long as it was part of the Marina development. I am thinking of both the Marina at Port Hadlock and the Marina at Pleasant Harbor. Am I correct. (See article VI on exempt activities from buffers--) IN the case, of Pleasant Harbor, the owners are presently working on the EIS for the regulations governing the planned Marina Village which is part of the comprehensive plan program given approval last year. The existing Marina support facilities (Dock access road, store office and related marina activities -pool parking showers etc) are all very close to the water (within 25-50 feet). In the planned improvement, so long as the ground floor contains the "marina related uses", am I correct that the upper floors could be residential under the "mixed use" approval allowed for water dependent water oriented water enjoyment mixed use projects. ? In addition, where part of the marina village, could single family homes and duplexes be constructed within the 150 foot setback, Could multi family (triplexes and four plexes). The Village plans a series of residential developments linking the Marina Village with the Golf Course, and a number of these would be in the shoreline area, Your prompt response is appreciated. Sandy Mackie I Perkins Coie LLP PHONE 206.359.8653 From: Michelle McConnell [mailto:mmcconnell@co.jefferson.wa.us] Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2009 10:44 AM To: Mackie, Sandy (Perkins Coie) Subject: SMP questions Hi Sandy, This is in response to your voice mail on Monday, sorry for the delay. To answer your questions: Article 2 - Definition for Marina does not include related commercial, recreational, or residential uses/development. These are defined separately. Article 6.1.0 - You are correct that the Preliminary Draft SMP proposes 150' buffer on the marine shoreline with an additional 10' building setback. This applies to all uses/development with the exception that water-dependent and water-related uses/development may locate inside the buffer. Most buffer options provided (Le. Common Line Setback, Non-conforming Lots, Critical Area Stewardship Pfan, etc) are only allowed for Single Family Residential use/development. The Shoreline Variance option would be available to a commercial development. Article 6.3 - Public Access policies and regulations are addressed Article 4.2 - The Shoreline Environment Designations (SEDs) are defined to help tailor application of the regulations to actual on-the-ground conditions. The Official Shoreline Map in Appendix A shows where these SEDs are proposed. Article 4.3 - The Allowed Uses Table shows new/expanded marina use/development prohibited in Priority Aquatic and Natural SED areas, allowed by conditional use in Conservancy and Shoreline Residential SEDs, and allowed in Aquatic and High Intensity SEDs. Non-water oriented commercial use/development is prohibited in all but he Shoreline Residential and High Intensity SEDs. 2 Article 7.2 - Polices for all boating facilities are provided in Section A, details for the SEDs in Section B, and marinas addressed in Section G. Article 8.10 - Transportation and parking lot development is addressed. Hope this helps, Michelle <><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><> Michelle McConnell, Associate Planner - LRP Lead Shoreline Master Program (SMP) Update Project Manager Direct: 360.379.4484 Web: www.co.jefferson.wa.us!commdevelopmentlShorelinePlanning.htm Jefferson County Department of Community Development Long Range Planning Division 621 Sheridan St., Port Townsend, W A 98368 Front Desk: 360.379.4450 Fax: 360,379.4473 NEW OFFICE HOURS: 9 a - 4:30 p Monday - Thursday; Closed on Friday <><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><> NOTE: All e-mail sent to this address will be received by the Jefferson County e-mail system and is subject to Public Disclosure under Chapter 42.56 RCW. This e-mail message has been scanned for Viruses and Content and cleared by MailMarshal NOTICE: This communication may contain privileged or other confidential information. If you have received it in error, please advise the sender by reply email and immediately delete the message and any attachments without copying or disclosing the contents. Thank you. This e-mail message has been scanned for Viruses and Content and cleared by MailMarshal 3