HomeMy WebLinkAbout2961-443a
G (Y1/ A
vve,:\p
Michelle McConnell
2..t1lo \
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
AI Scalf
Thursday, March 26, 2009 12:48 PM
Michelle McConnell
FW: JC Proposed SMP
@0
From: Ron Ewart [mailto:r.ewart@comcast.net]
Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2009 6:01 PM
To: AI Scalf
Subject: Re: JC Proposed SMP
AI:
Do everyone a favor and quit hitting REPLY TO ALL. I don't care what you have to say.
Ron Ewart, President
NARLO
Fall City, WA
To: Joy & Joe Baisch; ken shock
Cc: John Austin; Phil Johnson; David Sullivan; Michelle McConnell ; Norman MacLeod; Georqe Sickel; Bud Schindler
; ASM Inc ; larry and karen ; Kenn Brooks; Bob Lawhead; bill graham; Mountain Coalition; robertc(Q).harpub.com ; ron
ewart ; Karen Martin; jim haqen ; Judi Stewart ; jim kennedy ; Jim and Donna Buck; Larry Carter; Pat Rodgers; Jack
Venrick ; wayne king; Scott ; Emily; Teren ; waves(Q).olympus.net ; hoodcanal@windermere.com ; Val Schindler; Mike
Martin; Brooks & Barbara; Kathleen Bradford; Bonnie StOry ; Dennis Schultz ; Floyd Fuller; Richard Hild ; Jean; John
W Mc Duff ; Elmer Matson; Roger Short ; brinnon(Q).iohnston-realty.com ; Katherine Baril
Sent: Thursday, March 12, 20095:02 PM
Subject: RE: JC Proposed SMP
Joy
Public lands do not hold any special privilege that would allow damage to a neighbor. The County has a claim process
(rock thrown from County dumptruck hits passing car), responsibility under public duty doctrine and can be subject of civil
suit.
DCD has met with Jack W on the tax base impact and we will schedule time before the PC on this issue.
Take care
AI
From: Joy & Joe Baisch [mailto:elk@dishmail.net]
Sent: Wednesday, March 11,20096:11 PM
To: AI Scalf; 'ken shock'
Cc: John Austin; Phil Johnson; David Sullivan; Michelle McConnell; 'Norman MacLeod'; 'George Sickel'; 'Bud Schindler';
'ASM Inc'; 'Iarry and karen'; 'Kenn Brooks'; 'Bob Lawhead'; 'bill graham'; 'Mountain Coalition'; robertc(Cilharpub.com; 'ron
ewart'; 'Karen Martin'; 'jim hagen'; 'Judi Stewart'; 'jim kennedy'; 'Jim and Donna Buck'; 'Larry Carter'; 'Pat Rodgers'; 'Jack
Venrick'; 'wayne king'; 'Scott'; 'Emily'; Teren'; waves(Cilolympus.net; hoodcanal@windermere.com; 'Val Schindler'; 'Mike
Martin'; 'Brooks & Barbara'; 'Kathleen Bradford'; 'Bonnie Story'; 'Dennis Schultz'; 'Floyd Fuller'; 'Richard Hild'; 'Jean';
1
'John W Me Duff; 'Elmer Matson'; 'Roger Short'; brinnon@johnston-realty.com; Katherine Baril
Subject: RE: JC Proposed SMP
Thanks AI, for the comments. This brings up another concern. When the "public" lands under stewardship of local,
state and federal agencies/governments are not being maintained, protected, preserved, and therefore, cause
uncontrolled damage to adjacent properties, what is the liability/responsibility of the agency involved?
If it were a private land owner's actions, there would be legal recourse as we understand. Seems that "non-action" by
a public entity to deliberately jeopardize private property would go unhindered, thus creating a non-conforming
situation. This becomes a real possibility when "radical" elements work from a position of" the end justifies the
means".....that being the removal landowners homes.
The State of Washington is unique in it's private landownership. Since shorelines and tidal areas can be privately
owned there are a number of considerations being broad brushed. If you as a government entity feel compelled to
disregard the complexity of the issues being raised then the County and the State can expect vigorous push-back.
We hope the County is extrapolating it's impact of the tax base as well as the County & City budgets.......we assume the
City will be using similar rulings that you in the County feel compelled to impose.
Joy Baisch
2