Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2961-520 Latest SMP Draft Comments Page 1 of 1 Gn1..Pr. \( v-r'M'V\:vl,v Jeanie Orr 7A&1 From: Jeanie Orr Sent: Monday, June 15, 20097:41 AM To: Michelle McConnell Cc: AI Scalf; Stacie Hoskins; Jeanie Orr Subject: FW: Latest SMP Draft Comments From: AI Bergstein [mailto:albergstein@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, June 12,2009 11:03 AM To: The Leader; #Long-Range Planning Subject: Latest SMP Draft Comments In looking at the latest draft SMP, and as a representative for People For Puget Sound on the SMP Citizens Advisory Panel over the last two years, I have some concerns. We appreciate the Planning Commission's work to review the SMP based on citizen comments. In the latest draft, however, the Planning Commission has eliminated important safeguards that would protect shoreline habitat and water quality as new growth occurs. Many changes were made to the December draft with no clarity on why. For example, it appears that protections on geoduck aquaculture and fish pen aquaculture have been changed. I do not understand why since these have been agreed upon for over two years. Please remove the language allowing unregulated aquaculture on rural beaches and replace it with the previous language of compromise on near shore and intertidal aquaculture, including the ban on all net pens. The draft should not include unregulated high intensity aquaculture nor should it allow fish-farming pens along Jefferson County beaches. Please reinstate the science-based 1S0-foot buffers for all of Jefferson County shorelines. These buffers are sized to reduce erosion and flooding of our homes, prevent chemicals from poisoning shellfish beds, keep our beaches clean enough to swim in, and keep our salmon streams cool. I support the Planning Commission's efforts to balance property rights with environmental concerns, such as the revision to make it easy for homes to be rebuilt after a fire. I believe that we need a simple process that allows for development on nonconforming lots while protecting water quality and habitat, which the 50' buffer does not do. Also the draft does not make clear whether mining or mineral extraction is prohibited on the shore. There is contradictory information in the new draft on mining. Reducing the environmental safeguards on 60 miles of our county's shoreline is not an option. Let's get this done rig ht. AI Bergstein Board of Directors People For Puget Sound Member of Citizens Advisory Panel for the Jefferson Cty. SMP 1607 Admiralty Ave Port Townsend 360.344.4112 6/15/2009