HomeMy WebLinkAbout2961-643
( ;~,:t it',
-ft'V\ ....1./.
\t,/V " -r
,.., .. .1""''\.1'''''l.t'1~,
L)t'I"[
Jeanie Orr
2-- t/7& I
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Jeanie Orr
Wednesday, June 17, 20094:00 PM
Michelle McConnell
AI Scalf; Stacie Hoskins; Jeanie Orr
FW: SMP comments
r--\
(C'{3 )
'o'c."",-<-~..#.",j'"
-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Joseph [mailto:jjadv@olympus.net]
Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 2009 3:13 PM
To: #Long-Range Planning
Subject: SMP comments
Please add our names to those who are NOT in favor of aquaculture pens near or along our
shorelines. If the goal is to enhance the water quality of puget Sound, then why add
salmon rearing pens, which research has shown to be a breeding ground for disease that can
be passed to wild salmon. Further the fish are fed a mixture that contains hormones, that
end up in the fecal matter which then leeches
out in the water column and on sea bed. It just doesn't make sense.
There are better uses to be made of the coastal zone without the type of risks associated
with aquaculture.
Peter & Jeanne Joseph
6 Heron Rd.
Port Ludlow, WA.
1