HomeMy WebLinkAbout1180
.
I
I
..
I
.
I
I
.
Commissioner's Proceedings Vol. P
Jefferson County, Washington
-i~ I c~' -~ '..MV."_"Ay~':.i:~ !i':i"""5'~~:O ~:_
Current Expense. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $23,417.06
County Roads.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Equipment Rental & Revolvinq. .. . . . . . . . .
Council on Alcoholism. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
County Fair. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
law Library. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Department of Emergency Serv. . . . .. . . . . .
Fire Prot. Diet. #1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Fire Prot. Diet. #2. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Fire Prot. Dist. #3. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Fire Pret. Diet. #4.....................
Fire Prot. Diet. #5.....................
Water Dist. #1.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Water D1st. #2. . . . . . . . .. ... . . . . .. . .. . . .
75,389.94
37,932.82
851.45
684.31
61. 69
188.17
1,045 .50
448.62
48.08
1,086.47
4.00
570.90
285.46
2,549.20
Mental Health & Retardation........ .....
Motion by Commissioner Brown , second by Chairman Kelly to approve and sign Resolutiin No 46-73, to set up
funding for Bayshore Enterprises, Inc. through the MH/MR Fund, as follows: Unanimous.
RESOLUTION NO. 46-73
WHEREAS, it appears to the Board of Couhiy Commissioners that it is in the public interest that a formal
contract be entered into by and between Jefferson County, a muniCipal corporation, and Bayshore Enterprises, Inc.
a Washington corpaation, to the end that Chapter III of the Laws of 1967, Extraordinary Session, known as the
Community Mental Health Services Act, and the rules and regulations promulgated and adopted by the Director
of Social and Health Services of the State of Washington, be implemented and administered in manner and form
as contemplated under the aforesaid statute and rules and regulations, and
WHEREAS, Chapter 275-12, Washington Administrative Code, authorizes a Board of County Commissioners
to contract for Mental Retardation Services in accordance with the fcregoing a'Jtholity. and
WHEREAS, a delay will entail in the casting of suitable language to meet the objectives of the proposed con-
tract, and
WHEREAS, said Bayshore Enterprises, Inc. presently needs d isbursable funds in the amount of $1,700.00 to
meet current obligations incurred under Jefferson County's responsibility, therefore
BE IT RESOLVED that upon the approval of a proper voucher upon the Mental Health and Mental Retardation
Fund, the County Auditor for Jefferson County be, and she is hereby authorized and empowered to draw her
warrant payable to said Bayshore Enterprises, Inc. for the said sum of $1,700.00.
ADOPTED this 9th day of October , 1973
BOARD OF JEFFERSON COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
SEAL
/s/ Walter A. Kellv. Chairman
/s/ A, M. O'Mel1ra, Ivlember
/s/ B. G. Brown, Membllr.-.
ATTEST: La/ Betty J. Temple , County Auditor
and Ex-officio, Clerk of tho Board
Roquest from Mrs. Carolyn V. Bolin for exemption fmm Shore Uno Mauagoment Pormit System. Planner
Cunnf,ngham recommends that proJect, as proposed, appears to be exempt from the requirements. Motion by
CommissionGr Brown, seoond by Commt3sioner O'Meara to approve exemption. Unanimous. Chairman Kelly
si'1ned letter of approval drafted by Cunningham.
Copy of letter to Prose outing Attorney Daly regardtnlJ Buohmann v. Olympio Hoalth Distriot and rMflJrson County,
I from William A. Co1ltns, Al!lslstant Attom0Y General, was rel1d to tho Board. Lotter states that it appoarf.l th"t
allowing devE\lopment of the lots 11:11"9" enough to leQally use a well and septio tank would not EJer'lounly pro-
judice the public health, however, Mr. C olUne reoommends amending the platting ordinance r"quirinQ that a
public witter system ba installGd prior to approval of major plata to avoid pubHo health problems hi the future.
, lIAr. Da 1y presented a letter requesting the authority to compromise thi!l oaso. No definita aotion by tho B06rd
at this time.
Frank Garred, Publisher, Port Townsend Leader, appeared r0: Open Meeting Law. Stat.ed hel feels moaUngs
should be open not only to the pross, but also to the publio. Said 'there are definitely timels whon the Board
can meet in private: (1) Personnel; (2) Discussions on strategy in relation. to negotiations for emploYM con-
tracts; & (3) Discussione on sale or purohase of property. Stated ho beUeves the public: I:lhould have the