Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1311 Commissioner's Proceedings Vol. P Jefferson County, Washington TIllICK' .,.tu,:,~"y; '.C.4TTLI:'1Uae, ~_" . October 7 ,1974 10:00 a.m. Meeting called to order by Chairman Walter A. Kelly, with all Members present. I Sheriff Hansen appeared to inttoduce Deputy Jim Jones, Resident Deputy at Clearwater, and to advise that Mr. Jones has offered to paint the Annex and to take care of the general maintenanca of the building if the Board will grant authorization. He has built homes in the past and is familar with carpentry. Also, he is willing to construct a much needed carport there for the protection of the Sheriffs car and equipment if the county will furnish the necessary materials. No final determination by the Board at this time. I Mr. and Mrs. F. B. Clements appeared to submit a letter' of protest against the State Shorelines Hearings Boards final determination to vacate the Shoreline Mamigement Permit granted by the County for the corlstruction of a boat ramp on Pleasant Tides Properites. Mr. Clements said they and many other buyers would not have purchased this expensive property if they had not been assured repeatedly by the developer that such a boat ramp was one of the benefits included in the purchase price. Deputy Prosecuting Attorney Howard gave a briefr'esume of the State Shorelines Board hearing pertoining to this matter and advised that the county can appeal to the Syperior Court for re-hearing. Prosecuting Attorney Daly stated that in his opinion the determination of the Board, based on the findings of the Planning Department and the Shorelines Management Advisory Committee , should not be overruled by the state. The Board concurs and therefore by motion of Commissioner Brown and second by Commissioner 0' Meara, Prosecut- ing Attorney Daly and Deputy Howard were directed to pursue the matter of appeal. Unanimous. Motion by Commissioner O'Meara, second by Chairman Kelly to approve the minutes of September 23rd. I David Cunningham, Planning Director, submitted the follOWing business for the Beards consideration. (I) Preliminary Plats of Port Ludlow Division 4, and Port Ludlow Admiralty II Condominiums. Motion by Commissioner Brown, second by Commissioner O'Meara :to set hearing date for both plats for October 21st. Unanimous. (2) Recommendation re: Environment<..I1 Impact Statement for the Plat of Kala Point. After revieWing the environmental assessment, the Planning Commission recommends that an impact statement be prepared. Motion by Commissioner O'Meara, second by Commissioner Brown that due to the proposed project being a major action which will Significantly affect the quality of the environment, an environmental impact statement will be pre- pared, as recommended, and for the Developer to assist the Planning Department in compiling the statement. Unanimous. (3) Recommendation re: Environmental Impact Statement for the Preliminar~' Plat of Port Ludlow Golf Course Divisions. Based on findings of the Environmental Assessment, the Planning Commission recommends that an environmental impact statement be prepared. Motion by Commissioner O'Meara, second by Commissioner Brown that due to the proposed project being a major action which will flignificantly affect the qualitjr of the environment, an environmental impact statement will be prepared as recommended by the Planning Commission, and for the Developer to assist the Planning Department in compiling the statement. Unanimous. (4) Applications for Shoreline Management Substantial Development Permits~ (a) Ken Harris, Application No. 23 - for the construction of campground. including related landfill and installation of roads and utilities, Qullcene. Cunningham explained the proposed project, described topography of the area and submitted a project report including the fol.lowing conclusions and recommendations: Based upon the site inspection and finds of the Subcommittee, together with other appropriate facts and testi- mony, the Shoreline Management Advisory Committee recommends the Substantial Development Pernlit be grant- ed subject to the follOWing conditions: 1. Trailer spaces, camping sites, and similar facilities shall not be located on beaches and tidelands. 2. Water supply and sewage disposal shall be in compliance with rules and regulations of the Department of Social and Health Services and the Olympic Health,District. 3. Adequate proviSions shall be made f:Jr efficient and safe vehicular and pedestrian traffic, however, the the existing road leading to the beach berm shall not be widened. 4. Adequate proviSions shall be made to prevent campground " ov.erflow " and to protect the value and enjoyment of adjacent and nearby properties. Such proviSions may include fencing, Signs and planted buffer strips. 5. The use of "all-terra in-vehicles " for recreational purposes within the campinq area, or on the beaches or tidelands, is not to be !J6rmitted. 6. Signs associated with the campground shall be limited to : (a) One main advertising :Jign to denote the campground (b) Additional sings for the purpose of giving information and direction. Neon Signs are not permitted. No Sign or part thereof sha.ll r;onsist of bannaI's, posters, streamers, spinners, or other similar moving devices. Artificial lighting for signs 0\" other purposes shall be beamed away from the water, count road, and adjacent premIses so as not to cause glare or reflection that may constitute a haza\'d or nuisance. 7. Development of the campground shall be in compliance with applicable port!cms of WAC 248-72 and WAC 248-73. 8. Any rechanneling of the unMmed stream which bisects the proporty shall be done only after obtaining a Hydraulics Permit from tho Departments of Fisheries and Game. 9. No portion of the proposod landfill shall extend into any area normally inundated by tidal action. 10. In no event shall the normal tidal flow of the north-south sloughS be interrupted. 11. No herbicides, inaecticides, or other potentially toxic matorial shall be used for campground maintenance. Motion by Commissioner Brown ,second by Commissioner O'Meara that due to the proposed project is not a major aotion which would Significantly l!lffoct the quality of the environment ,declared that no environmental impact statement will be prepared. Unanimous. Mr. and Mrs. Farrow attended the meeting to advise that their dllughtor and son-in-law had submitted a letter of protest to the Planninq Dopartml3nt, however, their main concerns were covered adequately by tho conditions of approval. Cunningham also advised that based on the findings of the environmental assessme1nt, th-a Shorelinoo Advisory Committee recommends that an impact statement not be prepared. The Board finds that the project will comply with the poll.cies of th~ Shoreline Management Act and the Official Guidelines if developed in compli~nce with the conditions recommended by the Advis(Jry Committee and that the proposed project is not a ml!jor action whioh will Significantly (dfect the quality of too environ- ment. Motion by Commissioner ,Brown, llecond by Commissioner O'Meara to approve permit Iluh j ect to the . . I I .