Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1312 498 Commissioner's Proceedin2s \l'ol. P '-' Jefferson County, Washington : _.T~IC" "~~"!!~~~!_T_~~~~~ --~_:...,,~~_.,_-:-...-:"_''';'';'.~~'':''''''' conditions recommended by the Shorelines Management Advisory Committee and that an environmental impact statement not be prepared. Unanimous. (b) Ray Grove, Application No. 22 - f1ll for the purpose of sitting a lodging cabin, Port Ludlow, Bay. Cunningham used slides to show the project area and the physical features of the region. He stated that based upon the site inspecUon and findings of the Subcommittee, together with other appropriate facts and testimony, the Shoreltne Management Advisory Committee recommedns that a Substantial Development Permit be granted subject to the following conditions: 1. No fill shall extend beyond 150 feet inland from the line of Ordinary high water. 2. Fill material shall be restricted to soU, sand, or gravel. No other material shall be used. 3. Edges of fill shall be appropriately sloped and planted with vegetation to prevent erosion. 4. No structures to be erected upon the fill, shall be closer than 20 feet to the line of Ordinary High "'a ter . Motion by Commissioner Brown, second by Commissioner O'Meara that due to the proposed project 1s not a major action which w1ll Significantly affect the quality of the environment,del:::lared that no environment impact statement will be prepared as recommended by the Planning Department. Unan.imous. Cunningham also stated that after reviewing the environmental assessment they recommend that an impact statement not be prepared. The Board finds that the project will comply with the Shoreline Management Act and Official Guidelines if developed in compliance with the conditions recommended by the Shoreline Advisory Committee and that the pro- posed project is not a major action which will significantly affect the quality of the environment. Motion by Commissioner 0' Meara, second by Commissioner Brown to approve permit subject to said condItions and that an impact statement not be prepared as per recommendation of the Advisory Committee. Unanimous. (c) Harold L. Robinson, Appliaation No. 26 - for the construction of a concrete bulkhead and fm to pro- ject private property from further erosion, Oak Bay. Cunningham submitted a project report and described the proposed project and topography of the area. He stated that the Shoreline Advisory Committee found that the proposed project does not conform with the Shoreline Management Act since it does not comply with WAC 173- 16-060-(11), (e) and recommends that the Shoreline Development Permit be denied. He advised that a normal protective bulk1::~ad common to a Single-family residence is exempt from the permit requirements of the Shore- line Management Act and may be constructed by the applicant. However, it must be a bulkhead or rip rap substantially in alignment with the toe of the existing bank. After further discussion, Mr. Cunningham said that if its neces sary for Mr. Robinson to constmct a bulk- head, tieing it off on the neighbors bulkhead to protect his property from further erosion, he would be permitted to do so without a permit from the count. Motion by Commissioner Brown, second by Commissioner O'Meara to deny the proposed application as recommended by the Advisory Committee on the grounds that the applicant would be permitted to construct a "normal''''protective II bulkhead in compliance with the policies of the Shoreline Management Act. Unan imo\1s. Motion by Commissioner Brown, second by Commissioner O'Meara to send notice to the Department of the Army, Corps of Eng~neers that application No. 071-0YB-I-002257 I Harold 1. Robinson, does not conform to the official Shoreline Guidelines and therefore has been disapproved. Unanimous. (5~ Mr. Cunningham submitted the Draft Environmental Impact Statement for County and City Shoreline Management Pr'ogram and stated tl'B t copies will be placed in the .library and sent to all of the various agencies for their comments. (6) Environmentalo.ssessment from the Department of Ecology re: Proposed Amendment concerning permits for Substantial Developments on Shorelines of the State (WAC 173-14). Curmingham said that he has revIewed the Departments proposed regulations and his valuation is that even though the Department of Ecology ahs the authority to write regulations that affect the local gOvernments, they're being far too excessive in these regulations in telling counties what they can do. A hearing will be held in Olympia and he will either appear to testify or send comments. (7) Letter from the Department of Ecology re: Jefferson County Shoreline Management Master Program. Cunningham advised that all requirements have been met. (8) Draft from Clallam County Planning Department re: Plan of Action for the North OlympiC Coastal Basin Water Quality Management Plan. Purpose of the draft is to complete 303 (e) planning requirements in the form of an addendum to the water quality mangement plan IlS desired by the Department of Ecology. Board signed agreement for change in the manner in which Clallam County Consultant agreed to change. Motion by Commissioner O'Meara second by Comrr.issioTl!'.lr Brown to approve and sign the following Agreements between the County and Clallam~Jefferson County Community Action Council, Inc. to provide recreational facili- ties in the Hadlock area and to provide a Senior Citizens hot lunch prO{jram. Unanimous. AGREEMENT This Agreement is by and between lefferson County, a political subdivision of the State of Washington, hereinafter erforred to as the "County" and Callam-lcfferson County Community Action Council. Ina., a non- profit corporation, hereinafter referred to as the "Council". WHEREAS, the County iD authorized by R.C.W. 36.68 to provide Y.'ecreationl'll facilities, and WHEREAS, a need for a recreational facilities in the Hadlock aroa exists, lInd WHEREAS, the County has no facility in the Hadlock vicinity, and WHBREAS, the Council has leased a building and established u Multipurpose Reol'oation Centor in Hadlock, and WHEREAS, in establishing the Multipurpose Recroation Center in Hadlock thnt Council reUed 01'1 I'opre- sentations of the County that funding in the amount of $9,706.00 would be provided, ll,nd WHEREAS, the Council has made various committmonts l:,ailed on the County's assurance that lundo would be provided. Ii ~1IIII:I8a_ ~,__~~._,l::;Jr.u.i1 I I . I .. I I .