HomeMy WebLinkAboutLLA91-00008-0602/21/97
08:44 9360 45Z 8498
NTI ENG.& SURVEY
NORTHWESTERN TERRITORIES, INC.
Construct/on Coordiaation · Maledal~ Te.~
RECEIVED
FEB 1 1997
JEFF. CO. HEALTH &
HUMAH SERVICES
~491 I-~00-654-5545 F~X 452-84§8
LOG Jl
Post-it® Fax Note 7671 Date~).~..~c~ #of ~
pages /
Co./Dept..~T L Co. ~¢~ (fo ~.- ~i~
Phone ~ Phone ~
From= Rober~ A. Leach, PE
~...~Re~ Qutl. cene He£ghts subdivision - water suppl~ ' : ..... · .~ . ;, ' ..--=- issue's
~We are beg~nn'ing the process of developing a "proof.well" for the
above-subdivision, we need ~o make sure that we have all of the
requirementsunderstood up ~ront so that we can get accurate quotes
from well_ drillers as well as 'be sure that there aren't any
surprises .at final submittal time.
We will be drilling' one well at the location identified on the
preliminary'plat. The conditions require that this well be'tested
cons~sten% with community well requirements. Historically, ~hese
have been a.l[ttle different for group "B" systems compare~ to
group""A" systems. I propose that the following tests be performed
~ % and request your ¢oncurrence~ if you don't agree wi~h this list.,
please let me know ~e changes=
1.. Bacteriological
2. Inorganic chemical.[including chlori~es)
3. Nitrate
4. 24 hour pump test
Monitoring of nearby wells is supPose~ to happen as well. It' is
difficult to obtain reliable information from an~xisting well that
is in use as it has i~s own variations due ~o its operation. This
variation will mask any impac~ that might be present. Perhaps some
other method is adVisable. For example: the process that the PUD
used With its Shine well was ~o monitor n,a~by wells fO~ a period
o~ time to establish some knowledge (though not complete) of the
typical water level variations for that well so that future,
similar and normal variations wouldn'~ be blamed on the Shine well.
This, however, require~ that permission be obtained from the well
owner; if permission cannot be obtained than some other procedure
would be necessary. Another optionwould be a second drilie~ well
at close range (100'+ fo~ example)- for monitoring purposes' if this
other wells would.
Let me ~nbw as soon as possible. Thanks
FAX Mem°'-' February 21, 1.997 = (360) 385-9401 -1 sheet
TO: Jefferson County Health Department: attention Larry Fay
02/21/97 11:14 ~360 452 8498 NTI ENG,& SURVEY ~002
ljOPT!ON
3
4
SIMPLE
PRO
ROAD IS NATURAL
BOUNDARY
BEST AT USING SEPTIC
SITES
SIMPLE
CON
LOTS ARE
DISPROPORTIONAL
NO ACCESS TO CREEK
FOR LOT 1
ANGLED LINE
~¥[IGh'T AFl'ECl' USE OF
BE'ITER SEPTIC SOILS
OVERA1.1.
RANKING
4
RAY\LTR\PA(3
02/21/97 11:14 8360 452 8498 NTI ENG.& SURVEY ~003
02/21/97 11:14 8350 452 8498 NTI ENG.& $I~YEY ~004
£0~- I
'r
/
/
t
02/21/97 11:14 8360 452 8498 NTI ENG.& SURVEY ~005
LO7- /
//
02/21/97 11:15 ~560 452 $496 NTI ENG.& SL~VEY ~006
/..OT I
Z07- 2
02/21/97 11:15 9360 452 8498 NTI ENG.& SUEVEY ~]007
50~0,6~0 go
8O
?8"
70 60 50
'68J.286i
~q, feet4
A= 95700,0 sq fee~
!!I~LOT 3
IA~ g5650.0 ~ reef
,-1o
sq. feel
3341.022
$?13 796
DC5
PC6
2702.!69
5021.gg9
sq. fee'
FL PC6
2836.544
5289,652
LEGEND
0
290:~; .",:,
5502 673
2000 SF HOME
FOOTPRINT
SEPTIC TANK
PUMP CHAMBER
SAND FILTER
RE¥tSED SCHEMATIC OF ON '~"
SITE DISPOSAL SY~EM
ME~ING OF
- '~r/c~ ~//r~ ....