The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutReel_0025F p' k C. Updates 1. Updates may be sent in at any time, and should a ,t be submitted through your District State Aid: Engineer. „ 2. If you are changing inventory information, the white SWIBS CODING FORM must be used. 3. If you are changing only inspection information, the pale green INSPECTION CODING FORM is the most convenient to use. It is the only form "., available for updating the "optional" inspection items. The required inspection information may - be updated using the white SWIBS CODING FORM if ` you prefer. ° State Highway Dept. Response to City & County Inspection + A. Inventory 1. We will keypunch and process the data, updating the SWISS computer and the computer in Washington .f D.C. 2. A new SWIBS CODING FORM will be printed for each bridge updated, and will be returned to you so `i your files will be current. B. Inspection 1. Each July 1, a computer run will be made comparing a "Date of Last Inspection" and "Inspection Frequency" - y with the current year. A pale green INSPECTION CODING FORM will be printed for each bridge requiring inspection that year, and will be sent to you. r 2. When the bottom half of the INSPECTION CODING FORM u is returned to the state, we will update the SWIBS fa computer and print out a white SWIBS CODING FORM which will be sent to you to keep your file current. y 3. One or two years later, depending upon the coded "inspection Frequency", another INSPECTION CODING ? $ys $ FORM will be sent to you as described in paragraph `'1/? 1? 1• 1 ? C. Updates Vt 1. All updates, whether submitted on the white SWIBS ?baty* ' CODING FORM or the pale green INSPECTION CODING FORM, i will be accepted at any time and will be processed ? tai ! h? within 30 days of receipt at Olympia. S+ t r jl? t a} ... f ? t ' r .. -7 ' 7 Y , t ^1( k*?yyx?,'? .? 774 r I + 2. All updates, whether submitted on the white SWIBS CODING FORM or the pale green INSPECTION CODING FORM, will result in an updated white SWIBS CODING FORM being sent to you so that your files can be kept current. IV. Trouble-Shooting Any problems or questions may be directed to Gary Demich of the State Highway Department, Bridge & Structures Division, (206) 753-1356; SCAN 234-1356. n Cy ! a ° 'h' ' ' ) ' , ) ' ? .ry1 ?tY 4 hvr r y M , A6. R i ? rr t t ? I•' ? ! ?y? ? y R),ry?}- I h 1rF Yl. ?1 ? 1 1?? ? ? l??r ?) ? R ????, + I 3 ? t ? S. 1.4 R?? L %,J . ;L ? , ?? ? gKK,scrwK F 013TR(CT SIATS AJD EN6JK£F?Q n // '7 ? SW?as fla pox ?l FftNk1 GOpHb! ABM Q o S4dntTflN6 ? /?6ENG{? Q ,F intended for use during the field inspection of your bridges and satisfy both FHWA and. CRAB requirements for bridge inspection. The top portion contains computer printed information as currently stored in the SWIBS computer, while the bottom portion is an update form for inspection oriented data. Following completion, please separate the form at the center perforation, keeping the. top portion for your records and sending the bottom portion to your District State Aid Engineer. P Sending in the bottom form updates the SWIBS computer, and a standard white 8 1/211 x 14" SWIBS coding form will be returned to you for your records. No further action will be necessary on your part until another inspection form, triggered by the date of the most recent inspection and the inspection frequency, is sent to you. The white forms need be sent in only when data which is not updateable on the green form changes. Please note that the bottom portion of the top sheet contains optional coding areas. These items are not required by the FHWA but may be codified for your future use. These items are not included on the white coding form and will be printed out on your next inspection form. Should you have any questions regarding the use of this form, you may contact Dave Anderson of the State Department of Highways Bridge and Structures Division at (206) 753-1356, SCAN 234-1356. We are confident you will find this form time saving and easy to use and encourage you to inspect your bridges on a*regular basis. Sincerely, W. A. BULLEY, Direct of High ays s? rf y y-+ WAB:rs a stir °' ? ? KE:GD y: KEITH EG '• + 4 r'd t Enclosures Assistant Dire or '?,.:.. _,,,...,.._. _,.. ....,. for State Aid ?'?? fh tae ? tft? - d 7WTn? ! vn 'hy?, +t VwMl't r M q? t f}? r i Y l• r ao WASHINGTON STATE WV,?;s. •.,?,,,,? a; Dixy Lee Ray - Goventor ?t HIGHWAY COMMISSION DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS - Edwin A. Becker, P.E. Director of Public Works Jefferson County Courthouse Port Townsend, WA 98368 Dear Mr. Becker: y am < fd September 19, 1977 gg Review of SWIBS Program by FHWA This is to confirm our previous telephone conversation concerning the FHWA's procedures review of the SWIBS system in your County. The review is scheduled for September 27, 1977 at 9:00 a.m. in your office. I have attached a list of the questions that will probably be asked by representatives of the FHWA and State. Some of these questions will have to be answered by representatives of the Department of Highways, as they do not apply only to the County's program. I will be looking forward to seeing you at the review meeting. Very truly yours, J. D. ZIRKLE /District Engineer ?y( By: R. E. DARNELL District State Aid Engineer OfflCa of Dletrlct Engineer 5720 Capitol 9lvtl. Tumwatar, Wa. mailing addreea- P.O. Box 327 Olympia, Washington 98504 JDZ/mtc HB Attach. cc: Walt Bryant, FHWA r? fry ., , Y* - . - , Preliminary Report on. Status of Safety Inspection of Bridges ':? ' SIAM Rsr A ? . Bridge and Inspection Information 1. Best estimate of No. of bridges on Federal-aid system. 4. : • 2. Best estimate of No. of such bridges •under State control. ??'` ', 'rwa i' Best estimate of No. of such bridges under local government control. No. of local governments which control such bridges. -? " ;. 5. Hest estimate of No. of brid;;es not on Federal-aid system' , -, r under State control, if available. Best estimate of No. of brid;;es not on Federal-aid system , under control of local government, if available. - YES NO 7. Does the State intend to inspect the bridges under its control other than those on the Federal-aid systems? - .. _ YES NO 8. toes the State intend to inspect bridges on the Federal-aid .n`, u ' system that are under the control of any local governments? v ' „?• *' 9• If yes, give best estimate of how many bridges it intends to inspect for local Rovernments. •? '1 10. How many local governmental units control'these bridges? 11. Will the State inspection completely or only partially relieve these local governmental units of their inspection responsibilities? ?% 12. , Best estimate of how many local governments intend to Inspect h; ? ;, - the bridges under its control other than those on the Federal-aid ? t v P P s r F;. 6 ` '? . T systems? ?.v? . I r ; 13. Beat estimate of how many bridges not on the Federal-aid y t system and under the control of local governments will -be 4 1 Inspected.' } ?k 9 ••?, w 5 - more - Y t A? y as r? •? a ,ti ??..i:5 1745 1 .?? _ ..w? i S'' :'r?,..'Y?' .. ?a?Fk n?+Sf. '. ? t 4'r ' C. Local Government Bridge Inspection Personnel Information ' ^-- 1. Hew many individuals' in. charge of the local government ori;an- A z izational units responsible for bridge inspection, reporting and inventory are registered professional engineers or z qualified for registration under State law? ' %'• 2. If not registered or qualified for registration, how many- \ individuals in charge of the local government.organizational ib M unit.have had 10 years of experience in bridge inspection ,, . assignments in a responsible capacity? 3• Of those not registered or qualified for registration, haw many have completed a comprehensive training course based du. on ;ridge inspector's Training Manual"? - ?. - Best estimate of how many local government inspection teams will be used within the State. ' ' S• Best estimate of how many are now functioning. 6. Best estivate of how many of the individuals in charge of y _ bridge inspection teams are registered professional engineers or qualified for registration. 7• Of those not. registered or qualified for registration how , r a f th m ny o ose in charge of inspection teams have had 5 years of experience in bridge inspection assignments in a responsible capacity?' > Of those not registered or qualified for registration, how ` r t many of those in charge of inspection teams have completed ca". a comprehensive training course based on the "Bridge . n a . Inspector's Training Manual"? 1 9• How many local governments use or intend.to uusa Consulting Engineers for part or all of their bridge inapeetions? - ;, _ •, u, - more - } j . W . 59JNr. aa, ,yF+ [ 4 ? ?, ,. . . - . :Z! O F y?,,u+ ` , '' ? - - - ? • a ` ?"u 'Y? ?N:?i >IY#t rSiA,?, ? : w,hi?iaaa.! .{ -F\F"3 «?... tl. ?ld' ? y p •,..? ?e _ 4 10. Best estimate of the number of bridges that Consulting Engineers will inspect for local governsents.__,., , 7 . D. Training - z 1. How many Bridge Inspector's Training Courses has the State conducted? M,i YES NO 2. Does the State plan to conduct Bridge Inspector's Training ' Courses in 19727 p 3• How many State employees have attended the course? 4. -Best estimate of how many State employees will attend the ' course in 1972? . , - - 5• What are the starting dates 'of courses planned for the future? 4 6. How many hours of classroom instruction are included in _ ... ?' ' the course? & 7. How many hours of field instruction are included in the course? Fk jj, 8. Is the course based upon the"Bridge Inspector's Training. _. pr? ;; `'y ,• z , r4anual"? y a n p 9• Haw many visual aids are used on the course? : y a . 10. Is the"Bridge Inspector's Training Manual provided for each,, .. #' r student? YES NO 11. Has use been made of the Lesson Plans, Checklists, Work ty Booklets and visual aids prepared by Link Division of ? Singer Industries and made available to the States by FHWA - f -? ", Notice dated July 14, 19717 12. Has this use been extensive? Some? Little? or none at all? 13• How many students have completed the course to date? ' ae YES NO 14. Have Division or Regional Bridge Engineers attended or taken j; n. , ., part in the training7 a F, more sj, r 21. If so, how many such local governments are there? r,' 22. In addition to the"Bridge Inspector's Training Vanual"and the Bridge Inspector's Training Course material already made p available to the States, have you any suggestions regarding . _ additional assistance that might be provided by FHWA7. j ? 1 ? 1 i - more - ? ? yt .r .l Ni - V. E. Inventory and Inspection Procedures 1. What section of the State highway departments performs the ^ bridge inspection? 2. What section of the State highway departments prepares the inapection,neports? - more - &UN NYW N J ? ' Wyt+ i ! F ¢ WY{qq1/r 1??y?f? t ?? Y µ,,l, `. iyJk.?.1.4Y"lAA?+ ?M,yg y? ?y ?f ;n"YL it1?.,r?7y 7?l y 7V W77 1 y ,i + / t } I I ?l t?` I ` 15' is i d l H ov., BRIDGE HAINTENANCE INSPECTION REPORT AGENCY TOTAL NO. OF BRIDGES = tee ? TOTAL NO. OF BRIDGES ON.THE FEDERAL AID SYSTEM INSPECTED BY: (1) AGENCY NO. BRIDGES (2) CONSULTANT NO. BRIDGES t ? .• ' BRIDGE INSPECTION DAYS OF OTHER REGISTERED QUALIFIED FORMAL BRIDGE F.H.W.A. -LICENSED FOR YEARS TRAINING TRAINING CERTIFICATIOP ; NAME ENGINEER REGISTRATION EXPERIENCE . Y ,YI A? c 1 REI,NIRKS: 169 d¢1? ?r SW Lf??kt?t/• ?` ?R ?' ? ;n T4 ,C't? k.d FJh )OK f I.f. I f! f l I ? I ' i I _! 1 i l i i A I( ' 'I I I ? ' ' I I I i ??? I. i 1 I I i I I I i -7 -7. T Lo tt F • I I• I I i i i j, l' ! i ,' W I ? l 1 I. I I I I I I I' I? I l , i I , ; ! I ? ?,, ! I i I I I I ?. f , I„ ; ., I l .. ?„ `, .. _ _ I I i I I I - _ I I • i i I I I i , ? ? ? ? .?:? .. ?? , t?,;d.; , m ? nm e I ( ? tltl3A u ,? }, SSVI rnouJNn ] , ? -- . 1va303! p ?? ? ?,(??7 {N LJ O?y,, rvOV. o t° j 0 _ o b F pG I tl3NA10 ? 1V3 NtlI001S11J • ? A u _ '? '1101 r (? _ ? H10N31 an0130 w? -I ? ¢NC z „ ~ P7 `l 6< ? u „ rr U) „ ?y Q ?ujV a?? S N U 1\ 3]Intl35 1`7 V S _ _ 10 3- ? ?- t V 3v1NOna0H •1? 3]NVav3v Z i d Cl) j i NOI1tl01AtlN Q - lv]I 'n a a n , 0 I lI• I ? 3]NVtl 1 ] 3l HOI1v01ntlN ? 5 m . n C ?L ? O \ \ NOI?tl01AYH O LL- m . p 3tlvla V ` 3l]NV `? O f Z M3NS - .._?`u.. ?? Orrvr?M. v. :a wvi ry..a.... «.a•.__0 ..-.:..,Ntl103w .q L O i£o lzs- Z Q O V A a ? V Q 15q Otl U. A1H,MJ]' 7y r' J 3 ? ? . (13 101tl1510 cx I !xO C " Z 03 to b 1N1 i ' ? ,Qi n lblY]Atl .. Y b\L 1;' m - 3 YOdl `? O .in]H3nonl - f\ cr W _ .? LAJ z z w w O ~ u+'e1Nno3 a: m O CO w_ N m? 6Nlltltl AtlO1N3AN1 ON 11vb ONIIVU3d0 L l1vM '13tl 0 SWtl0'tl%3` l3NNtlNJ" F- 0NI0tl1tlf5^ n, V -C3 Z M Q g W 1tlb31tll v S N] N S 8 bJ V 0 v W z _ u 0 _ A]N3n03tli,°? _ w NOI1J3dSN1 W a tlY3A 3stle" e O p -UD3dSNl 1 O o m m x L1J ? L1_ - W - HJNnaA + a6 Olltl01ldn0 g i© C\j O M N O O O O O O ti ti 00 co ti ?a i i-E f i l l I (' I i i! I I, L, i, i I f i? I I I P f l l I? I? l i l i I I I I I I I{ ? I I I I I ,•+ i i .;, _ ?i II III ? 1111 I t ,? 3 ?•..? ? .. _=`CLi'ln.Ci i I 'I ' I I I 1 ? ! ( I I , , I I ? -i I? I I I h ?? ? I ?, x?I ? II I I ? ? ! ? I I• vai... , ? ! f I I I I I ?I ? I ? ?? I I `;c , ?, ? ?? I I I 1 i I ? i > 1 I 1 I I I 'IF WWI t 1?1N5,"F I.f ? ?. } f 4 I r ?r. A i' Is 00 co co co 00 0 E0 0 oW o rn cn .A > cN s? M 4 OUPLIL TED BY E C S °m V f °? sig. _ m 71 rri ?y ? a ? m of O, E O ~ V mINSPECTION D - g g .0 rr, n aEASE YEAR _ VINSPELTION m m n $FREOUENCY - Sm _ O co D m y Q uacCLEAR. 4 - MINIMUM O ATERAL xoN-a uNDER- _ f r $ ? CRLEdRANCE [iaE T I ? N MUM .? Du n Q LATEfldL n i:L C UNDER- 1J 5 CL(4 rtE Z CLEARANCE F4w.1E LEFT £ inECTCN _ N WEARING ?` PS ?p SURFACE O €^ N^°o z 'DECK nP11YSICAL '! n m O J WLNEPABIL. Q a .S.-STR. g (DECK C? .SUBSTRUC. = m SURFACING FCMANNEL Cyr 7777-7- g ?" ~ +E%P pAMS .RET. WAIL yY Acuaes FIA 'L A ? Y -A- F^? 8 o SSTRINGERS Q ? .' _ rBC-S g OPERATING RATING •APPR. NOW,. :CONDITION INVENTORY RATING ALIGNMENT t 3 a; co ? ? 0 0 ? X o 0 <o???T; N O M ? ? z m m ? a z c cz ? m ? ? m rn ? V N M ? P N ' Cu ENCER _ UPDATE O - _ m )CP msrRR:r , m DAUNTT 'ROAD GIST. ? I O m I ?. o m? n e ? ? D Z O t? z 0.... -?. Z O Z o co O (n O T T N co 2m D Z 6 'l u O C n C 7J ? tr Q ^ H 77 DETOUR O v LENGTH GT R v a ee 'n u V j fMTEY Un w N r _ l l -, g ?OYIN.. DVR," ?? on PuILT I'll L t s{ i SYY?e$' 31 3A ' 1 ? N 3N0l -1 31 QO 7 El N315A5 -- m b tl $ ? 3N x0 xmaolsn] nol -/ 31 Q It 01 It 013a ? Y I Ln 41 W \ U - ~ 9 D Q \. W G co m C/) O O m r O 1 _ ? z - w _ co > z 0 ? U c 7 O ? ? F- C7 I ? Z v It- #b. A L LLJ p c a o.? < v p• u W wotl lAAM G LLJ l3Itl1fIC f1 a Z w l(1 3 E c K 0 m - o y,.ad - p tln«anms a c V - y- r ? w w m M m _ z z ;; ff} (D "s At' v & m N ?O O ig GNI15 (10 swvo'dx; LLJ eNUVJdns (? N]3f ¢?Q Q - W z O a? U C S O J Q O t? O _ t 10N3n03e1 w N01133d5N1 .131 35tle Q NOWUSN1 O J m :v U) ? a J R; w S ovlJ'S'o-'v _ 31tl15 xll3Ne - -' _ 31n0+J ? J J1 3nHl NPN ? u Q.? S 1NIid 15tl1''' ? i 0 tltl3A _ 3cu No iviaaad. 3bv - h? NP11?3.- ens' ]30 ? ams- ? ? stlv oN? 1]tltl1N0]- atl" ???dls 1NItl _ _ }?w Yw 82 'llBtltl3NlM? w ? ltl]ISANd- N011?3tl1 ? 35tl3A3u ?v?3r, 9 yll+oz ox P1J?3tl10 i z uoa %v tl3l] tlN H?i _ r=y. a a? C 7 I ? 6 a 0 Fn r l IT (D O O O El O 00 00 OD r-- - L- f- f? d S v I ,. I n 1 ? n 11109f N tltl3A u ' 3vNOLL]NOd lcb]03d Q ° Jvltl 1??'--ll _ - Ivn y ^ W31sas? p n y ? _ ? 1 J m k. 3dA1 llvtl - 8 O - sNlvtlc ? LL Q F 13NM0 w ( h NVIOOlsn] ,101 rt ? - H10N • ? tl00139 1N3WN011V aN10f 3dNOISNtltlX3n1 ` 2 '^ tlMtl31Vm` g ?' 5311111111 q? g o w n g dv] O,., '103 831d ^ ? w¢ >'tl3LtlidNfl 03Wtl31N1 u .A V i 030 X330 - 1N3mLn"' y] - ? a 3tlf11]ntl15 1NItld` o O r • s3]IA3ov39t 9NItl u c ONllvtl A OIUAN1 Sb39tllo W ¢ Y s3HOtlva No1319 N0] ' e 53550tl1 - 0 swv3e 'tl= v W -53 9Nllvn ONIlvtl3tl0 _ s a v]= ? SWtl39° 1 F'? 1_ Y) _ 3]IAtl3s Stl30NItl15? U - a` - !0 3dll Q % - SNItlM? 2 s p ltli Np2ltlOH 3]tltlv311 llvM 13tl' w E 1 131- 11' W ° 41 - ltl]Iltl3n V .13 ?. v ? Q 3]NVtltl3l] 'tl15N3dn5' Q ?_ ^ ? C G O N011v91ntlN ? X]30 ? Z °k< m O v \ O NowWJInVx a - lL r ^ v / 3]vlbnS Q 3xvl! ONItlv3M w _ O 3 ?/ z O + C : O M3S 3JNtlbv3l0 1tltl301V1 Z 0v w Ww 0 m j 1? • g o ?n - ?tl 30v, Q z a a LL N01530 O { ° Z ibq O Ea 14) CD IIN3 ? w N011]3dSNl ^ C) R y 2 a tlv3A 35VO W O ___ P i °d Q N011]3d5NI O J c V N O; a m o q O 3 i ° z l s N, ..A1NfXYJ ? ? ? W _ ((? 1]Itl1510 u O Q n Z 1? r l ?1 031036tl3 NI lbnlv3f c LL W 1-93b w - C7 Q v3A ? 3 2 O ' m - , ]1v0dn G C O '? Y U. ? II w -- H]Nnda X a9 ou"11W w w ?c I Z z O ?r•. w ul 1 D _. O T UN 11N6P. V a: CO - N M -- -- ^ O O O 0 O 00 00 cn E 00 f?- Imo- I- -1 s? °8 I 4 orb's `e'v ? - tl 3A sY U pNN 31tl15 SSpV, ? %Il3tld; IVNJIlONN ? J1nOt1 au 1PU303i' AbU11+3?N1 ?? ?? unr map. - _ '?y - _ _ n3lsisv i ? ? ? x F ?. 1NItld 15P1_ o ? ? u !0 tlp3A L ?•i ?' - 3- 1- o ? - .lam uS ? 3 W 3a0] _ G ` oa 1010 O " 7 IPJNP: n? U3NM0 N011]3a?- O Ntl10015n] 1101 s2? - 01tl0- - 2S 9Plf 'ONM - N10N31 i C 1]tltl1N00' tln0130 1N3WN011P U11 INI?03-? v - NOISMX3 Q a. '4_^ AtlMtl31tlM" -..'.. G Q I d- oW R„g ff atlo apoi alo S V a V31]b30Nn'101tl153 - - ?:?`? ca '039 M]30 N1tl. _ c ON Ill - '' u $ AtlOIN3ANI u a?= NOI110N00 `? 'AMOU 'tlddP ij y ,, o ONlltltly ?. ONI1tltl3d0 L(G u _ _ 7 J I ? W J. 3]IAa3s G U V I fo 3d" 'b - Y - I 1-02180H+ w> Q ?]? 3]NtlaP310 z i NOlllOIAPN 1ltlM '13b w Q l3NNtl0 g w - U7 t ']ntllstlns" w 1P] MA v U l0 tl3Nlnna - P]ISANd Z J C7 31-131D tllstl3dn5' l O ? NOI1r01npN __ cC N]30 ` z ? " Y G Q co '}III NOIIp01'ON 3-nS" ¢'- LL- ?+! O 34", ON-3M 0 iJ3b1 w s 35 ln3b 3131 g '^ - 31]NV 3]NPb30Nn z V M3 - l 1 Zie01?. z Wtltl3ltll O Z.. '^ Np 03W nINIW U 1]3b1J - 0tl' n ?3 L U d - -131tl1 0 Y1N31 nOH Z /? ? K 1 bY3l] x - O c OPOI J ? ? N01S30 Q ?a J• u?y _ F-- ??fF - LL LL, N01133dSNI o R >aWO $ w O `y ?o$? WEE' 1z - a es 3. "; W ?? Y (n ? a' ??W 6 M,--v "Im- LL Q %Z tl 3 £ £ m - ?'rrb»c3a C _ H]NneA3> Aa a3n]nena 8 a W .. F" m ° V) 5w _ U j a $; Z ? W F F- WU' ?'oN AINI'O]1'.. C2 w u crr m N K) • ?t E O O O O Op oo- co o? c0 .' -r I -00 r f? ? JA F K•Y 1ttil 7 t Ulna" tltl31 $SVlO 1: r:04JNnl ®O ?? 1tltl303i', rvJ<'' _ rv315A5 ~ O 11 0 ^ 7 Nmaossro" 1101 N10N31 tln0130 ? ¢ I $ I W -I H Vi U F 12 O w c? 0 rn , m ? O m LL -- r o z - ?yJ z U .. Z O n O R Ld a > ? T A:q CWtl A1NnW W IJrH1S10 Z ? ? R 0 ? m ? JINdIYc m w o ¢ ? r - z 2 w w O ~ ? O M AIMneO 0 m. ?O • N V) W H U Z Q _W F - z D O U cl? 0 LL J Z _O d O W Q O w w CO U) 0 w w LL w 2 O O Lc`o O O O 00 00 C ? f? f? f 1 g ? a ? w - N? 1NItld 15tl1^ 10 tltl3A ?' t {t %¢r u H; z MJ30r OItlO T ? 1 90l! ON" 1Jtltl1NOJ? - , r ? ? l 1/ a YV r. + JY A"'IJ?P 1 5E 'FM ' t -? S S O UO ti ti M6A ^ i R78 631 BRIDGE DATA SUMMARY SHEET 1 OF 2 SR / SRMP 9517 6.79 08/05/72 STRUCTURE ID 3 ® CONTROL 16 095 17 006.79 0 0 009517003 y MAIN KEY 16 095 17 006.79 0 0 g V SERIAL NURSER CHIMACUM r? ® . CS 16 CSMP 0.29W FAS9415 _ PLAN SEQ CS SEQ SEC r T Nr R WM 4 16 YEAR BUILT LOADINGS (KIPS/AXLE) it Lai 53 RECONSTRUCTION 2 DESIGN LOAD : , ® 2000 LIFE EXPECTANCY 215 INVENTORY RATING CONTRACT NUMBER/FLAG 220 OPERATING RATING 4 ® CODER - RESTRICTED LIST . 0 MAIN LISTING FLAG LOAD LIST i"- 141 INVENTORY ROUTE PREFIX INSPECTION BASE YEAR ® NON INV. ROUTE PREFIX INSPECTION FREQUENCY SERIAL N0. OF MAIN LIST INSPECTION TYPE 1 ® STATE FUNCTIONAL CLASS LANE USE CODE r FEDERAL FUNC. CLASS 15 TYPE OF SERVICE ON/UNDER r 3 TOLL 02 LANES ON ? ® 33 CUSTODIAN/OWNER 00 LANES UNDER 4 ADMIN. JURISDICTION 0 MEDIAN I 34 FEDERAL AID SYSTEM 00 SKEW 1 322 FEDERAL AID ROUTE NO. 0 FLARE DEFENSE SECTION PAINT LIST ' DEFENSE BRIDGE LETTER STEEL WEIGHT DEFENSE MILEPOST GRID DECK s DEFENSE SECTION LENGTH LAST PAINT YEAR K ® PHYSICAL VULNERABILITY 0 NAVIGATION CONTROL . 'LATITUDE 000'NAV. CLEAR. VERTICAL . 'LONGITUDE 0000'NAV. CLEAR. HORIZONTAL 3 DISTRICT .01SIDEWALK - RIGHT DIVISION 4.91SIDEWALK - LEFT ® 16 COUNTY 30.01CURB TO CURB 0000 CITY 37.01OUT TO OUT $ ® 34 APPROACH ROWY. WIDTH --'--"MIN. VERT. OVER BRIDGE DECK 05 BYPASS DETOUR LENGTH ' 0"MIN. VERT. UNDER BRIDGE } / LEGISLATIVE BR. NO. --'--$'MIN. VERT. OVER INV. ROUTE a ® 2510 ADT INV RT - YR 72 --.-'MIN. LATERAL CLEAR. - RIGHT r 002510 AOT ON STR - YR 72 --.-'MIN. LATERAL CLEAR. - LEFT 1,' :? ? t 4 r 4 ® MAIN APPROACH NUMBER OF SPANS 1 s }a' SPAN TYPE - WSHD TOTAL LENGTH 33' } f SPAN TYPE - FHWA 101 000 MAXIMUM SPAN 30' t CLEARANCES SR REVERSE CLEARANCE MIN. MAX. MIN. MAX. INDICATOR A '- r VERTICAL n r n r n r u : '?'A, `??+ C"S r ,? 1 ,Yw TOTAL HCRIZ. PAVEMENT WIDTH RIGHT ' r • ' LEFT RIGHT LEFT Y?tQ a' ? '? ? f ?y ® LATERAL UNDER t a ;R R78631 BRIDGE DATA SUMMARY SHEET 2 OF 2 SR / SRMP 9517 6.79 t k ® 08/05/72 STRUCTURE ID CONTROL 16 095 17 006.79 00 009517003 > ® MAIN KEY 16 095 17 006.79 00 A SERIAL NUMBER CHIMACUM CS 16 CSMP FAS9415 PLAN SEQ CS SEQ EC SEC T N? R WM FEATURES INTERSECTED FACILITIES CARRIED INSPECTOR CONDITION 8 DECK APPRAISAL 7 STRUCTURAL COND. CODER - DATE 9 SUPERSTRUCTURE 6 DECK GEOMETRY sa !F ® UTILITIES 8 SUBSTRUCTURE 9 UNDERCLEARANCES 20 WEARING SURF- 6 CHAN. G CHAN. PROT. 4 SAFE LOAD CAPACITY r EXP. JT. TYPE 8 RETAINING WALLS 8 WATERWAY ADEQUACY ® DECK SCALING 8 APPROACH ROADWAY 8 APPROACH ALIGN. i INSPECTION REPORT CONDITION RATING 7 GEN. CONDITION STRINGERS BEARING DEVICES DECK LONGITUDINAL BEAMS PAINT ABUTMENTS SURFACING CAPS FLOORBEAMS 8 RETAINING WALLS k EXPANSION DAMS INTERMEDIATE PIERS CURBS TRUSSES ARCHES PIER PROTECTION RAILS SIDEWALKS GIRDERS 8 APPROACH ROADWAY DRAINS RAIL TYPE 0 a® PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT S EMENT YEAR YEAR NEEDED IMPROV TYPE OF SERVICE IMPROVEMENT TYPE TYPE CF WORK E TOTAL COST ® IMPROVEMENT LENGTH PRELIM. ENGR. COST DEMOLITION COST DESIGN LOAD ROADWAY WIDTH STRUCTURE COST A? w NO. OF LANES ON/UNDER SUPERSTRUCTURE COST PRIORITY fsc ?? DESIGN ADT - YR l ® UNDEFINED CROSSING DAT A s t (GROUPS 1- 3 ) (GROUP 4- 7 1 (GROUPS 8-11 1 (GROUP 12-15 ) (GROUPS 16-19 1 (GROUP 20-21C) UNDEFINED STRUCTURE (GROUP 1- 3) (GROUP 4- 6 1 (GROUP 7-10) (GROUP 11-12C) CODER OF LAST CODING 5-72 DATE CF LAST CODING 8-04-72 DATE CF LAST CROSSING RECORD TRANSACTION 8-04-72 DATE OF LAST STRUCTURE RECORD TRANSACTION 8-04-72 DATE CF LAST CROSSING CONTROL FIELD CHANGE 8-04-72 DATE CF LAST STRUCTURE CONTROL FIELD CHANGE A+W e '?pp ule ys'1:37A3? r.? µ?wwp?far .,Iqm.- 3' wi r r t.k"1 6 yd? 4 a '! c ? t t . i? 117 i e? tit : i `k Y! fi G e7i v t13. aararat._.. as e. 4 P R 4 @ e7 ® 878631 BRIDGE DATA SUMMARY SHEET 1 OF 2 SR / SRMP 9527 1.57 rat 06/05/72 STRUCTURE ID ° ?•"_ '? ® CONTROL 16 095 27 001.57 00 009527004 t . E MAIN KEY 16 095 27 001.57 00 SERIAL NUMBER PORTAGE CANALI v I? ® CS 16 CSMP 1.57E JNCT FA59415?I - V vl- 1. PLAN SEQ CS SEQ SEC . T N, R WM aE 7 _t ® 51 YEAR BUILT LOADINGS (KIPS/AXLE) 00 RECONSTRUCTION 5 DESIGN LOAD a a '+J 2050 LIFE EXPECTANCY 220 INVENTORY RATING"' a CONTRACT NUMBER/FLAG 227 OPERATING RATING ® CODER - RESTRICTED LIST 0 MAIN LISTING FLAG LOAD LIST y? 141 INVENTORY ROUTE PREFIX INSPECTION BASE YEAR ® NON INV. ROUTE PREFIX INSPECTION FREQUENCY SERIAL NO. OF MAIN LIST INSPECTION TYPE STATE FUNCTIONAL CLASS LANE USE CODE a r ® FEDERAL FUNC. CLASS 15 TYPE OF SERVICE ON/UNDER; 3 TOLL 02 LANES ON ® 33 CUSTODIAN/OWNER 00 LANES UNDER: ?ry 4 ADMIN. JURISDICTION 0 MEDIAN ` 34 FEDERAL AID SYSTEM 00 SKEW ® 974 FEDERAL AID ROUTE NO. 0 FLARE € DEFENSE SECTION PAINT LIST ` DEFENSE BRIDGE LETTER STEEL WEIGHT ® DEFENSE MILEPOST GRID DECK• DEFENSE SECTION LENGTH LAST PAINT YEAR PHYSICAL VULNERABILITY 1 NAVIGATION CONTROL y a." ® 'LATITUDE 057'NAV. CLEAR. VERTICAL " 'LONGITUDE 0140'NAV. CLEAR. HORIZONTAL ® 3 DISTRICT 2.01SIDEWALK - RIGHT 77 DIVISION 2.0'SIDEWALK - LEFT 16 COUNTY 22.0'CURB TO CURB p° ® 0000 CITY 26.01OUT TO OUT ` c 30 APPROACH RUWY. WIDTH --'--"MIN. VERT. OVER BRIDGE DECK ® 99 BYPASS DETOUR LENGTH ' 0"MIN. VERT. UNDER BRIDGE " c 8 LEGISLATIVE BR. NO. --'--"MIN. VERT. OVER INV. ROUTE 2195 ADT INV RT - YR 72 --.-'MIN. LATERAL CLEAR. - RIGHT i ® 002195 AOT ON STR - YR 72 --.-'MIN. LATERAL CLEAR. - LEFT MAIN APPROACH 'ter in f_, ® NUMBER OF SPANS 3 2 SPAN TYPE - WSHO TOTAL LENGTH 670' r ?? '.+ ® SPAN TYPE - FHWA 305 204 MAXIMUM SPAN 250' hT CLEARANCES SR REVERSE CLEARANCE ?r* 1 , ali'w , 'a ® MIN. MAX. MIN. MAX. INDICATOR r a ,ay VERTICAL n n , n I n t} ard{ 4?; i rY`'. :TOTAL HGRIZ. S,x?? r41 PAVEMENT WIDTH RIGHT LEFT RIGHT LEFT a mot. ® LATERAL UNDER t I r tS;;? t ?? ? of q ' it y , ;Sf t , 'a , ? y ,'?yt VY Y I ? ? 1 - ? I + .( ' # i eke M ?' 4 i t S r t r ? r l ?r? ?'?, W b dF _x, I v+z t V 1, r ?jyN R78631 PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS YEAR NEEDED IMPROVEMENT YEAR TYPE CF SERVICE IMPROVEMENT TYPE TYPE CF WORK E TOTAL COST IMPROVEMENT LENGTH PRELIM. ENGR. COST DESIGN LOAD DEMOLITION COST ROADWAY WIDTH STRUCTURE COST / NO. OF LANES ON/UNDER SUPERSTRUCTURE COST DESIGN ADT - YR PRIORITY IGROUPS 1- 3 1 (GROUPS 8-11 1 (GROUPS 16-19 1 (GROUP 1- 3) { (GROUP 7-10) UNDEFINED CROSSING DATA (GROUP 4- 7 ) (GROUP 12-15 1 (GROUP 20-21C) UNDEFINED STRUCTURE (GROUP 4- 6 ) (GROUP 11-12C) ® CODER OF LAST CODING -72 DATE CF LAST CODING r + 8-04-72 DATE CF LAST CROSSING RECO j t Qy w 'k r mf"' ?q • RD TRANSACTION B-04-72 DATE CF LAST STRUCTURE RECORD TRANSACTION 8-04-72 DATE F Mf f C LAST CROSSING CONTROL FIELD CHANGE 8-04-72 DATE a .. OF LAST STRUCTURE CONTROL FIELD CHANGE k girl r ? ? 1 { ? Y ,yet a '{??. ?^,Fs?fif L' r 4? 'W ??+'y` ].s+L I 1 ??- } ?h?"?'i +? ??t 4 Y ?{? 1 1 11fd a d 1t I d P F1 t ? f? a n n, . , 1 , s ? i,a , ^?i q) « XM,'A BRIDGE DATA SUMMARY SHEET 2 OF 2 08/05/72 CONTROL 16 095 27 001.57 00 MAIN KEY 16 095 27 001.57 00 SERIAL NUMBER CS 16 CSMP PLAN SEQ CS SEQ FEATURES INTERSECTED FACILITIES CARRIED SR / SRMP 9527 1.57 STRUCTURE ID 009527004 PORTAGE CANAL 1.57E JNCT FAS9415 SEC , T N, R WM INSPECTOR CONDITION APPRAISAL CODER' 8 DECK 7 STRUCTURAL COND - DATE 9 SUPERSTRUCTURE . 6 DECK GEOMETRY UTILITIES 8 SUBSTRUCTURE 9 UNDERCLEARANCES 11 WEARING SURF. 7 CHAN. E CHAN. PROT. 8 SAFE LOAD CAPACITY EXP. JT. TYPE 8 RETAINING WALLS 8 WATERWAY ADEQUACY DECK SCALING 8 APPROACH ROADWAY 8 APPROACH ALIGN. INSPECTION REPORT CONDITION RATING 7 GEN. CONDITION STRINGERS BEARING DEVICES DECK LONGITUDINAL BEAMS PAINT SURFACING CAPS ABUTMENTS EXPANSION DAMS FLOORBEAMS 8 RETAINING WALLS CURBS RAILS TRUSSES INTERMEDIATE PIERS SIDEWALKS ARCHES GIRDERS PIER PROTECTION DRAINS RAIL TYPE 8 APPROACH ROADWAY F. .f -.. ? i R78631 BRIDGE DATA SUMMARY SHEET 2 OF 2 08/05/72 CONTROL 16 094 15 008.78 00 ® MAIN KEY 16 094 15 008.78 00 SERIAL NUMBER m s CS 16 CSMP PLAN SEQ CS SEQ FEATURES INTERSECTED d FACILITIES CARRIED ® INSPECTOR CODER - DATE UTILITIES V 20 WEARING SURF. (. EXP. JT. TYPE DECK SCALING ' r,g ® 7 GEN. CONDITION DECK ® SURFACING EXPANSION DAMS CURBS ® RAILS SIDEWALKS 31 G , F s DRAINS ® g ® SR / SRMP 9415 6.78 STRUCTURE ID 009415002 YARR 1.45N JNCT FAS9315 SEC , T N, R WM CONDITION 8 DECK 9 SUPERSTRUCTURE 8 SUBSTRUCTURE 8 CHAN. E CHAN. PROT. 8 RETAINING WALLS 8 APPROACH ROADWAY APPRAISAL 7 STRUCTURAL COND. 4 DECK GEOMETRY 9 UNDERCLEARANCES 8 SAFE LOAD CAPACITY 8 WATERWAY ADEQUACY 8 APPROACH ALIGN. INSPECTION REPORT CONDITION RATING STRINGERS BEARING DEVICES LONGITUDINAL BEAMS PAINT' CAPS ABUTMENTS FLOORBEAMS 8 RETAINING WALLS TRUSSES INTERMEDIATE PIERS ARCHES PIER PROTECTION GIRDERS 8 APPROACH ROADWAY RAIL TYPE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS YEAR NEEDED IMPROVEMENT YEAR TYPE CF SERVICE IMPROVEMENT TYPE TYPE CF WORK $ TOTAL COST ® IMPROVE MENT LENGTH PRELIM. ENGR. COST DESIGN LOAD DEMOLITION COST ROADWAY WIDTH STRUCTURE COST NO. OF LANES ON/UNDER SUPERSTRUCTURE COST r' DESIGN ADT - YR PRIORITY r J" a UNDEFINED CROSSING DATA J 'i? sa > -, } .; , y ® (GROUPS 1- 3 ) (GROUP 4- 7 ) ` (GROUPS 8-11 ) (GROUP 12-15 ) Y1 ' (GROUPS 1 6-19 ? (GROUP 20-21C) ® r UNDEFINED STRUCTURE r if (GROUP 1 - 3) (GROUP 4- 6 ) ?.n (GROUP 7-10) 1GROUP 11-12C) J CODER OF LAST COOING 5-72 DATE. CF LAST CODING ?W vnn: 0-U4-72 DATE OF LAST CROSSING RECORD TRANSACTION ® 8-04-72 DATE CF LAST STRUCTURE RECORD TRANSACTION B-04-72 8-04-72 DATE CF DATE CF LAST CROSSING CONTROL FIELD CHANGE LAST STRUCTURE CONTROL FIELD CHANGE i y a : u DEFENSE MILEPOST GRID DECK a DEFENSE SECTION LENGTH LAST PAINT YEAR t PHYSICAL VULNERABILITY 0 NAVIGATION CONTROL ?r . 'LATITUDE 000'NAV. CLEAR. VERTICAL 'LONGITUDE 0000'NAV. CLEAR. HORIZONTAL + 3 DISTRICT 0OSIOEWALK - RIGHT DIVISION .01SIDEWALK - LEFT 16 COUNTY 26.90CURB TO CURB , 0000 CITY 30.01OUT TO OUT 26 APPROACH RDWY. WIDTH --'--"MIN. VERT. OVER BRIDGE DECK 11 BYPASS DETOUR LENGTH ' 0"MIN. VERT. UNDER BRIDGE i / LEGISLATIVE BR. NO. --'--"MIN. VERT. OVER INV. ROUTE q 1605 AOT INV RT - YR 72 --.-'MIN. LATERAL CLEAR. - RIGHT 4 {, 001605 ADT ON SIR - YR 72 --.-'MIN. LATERAL CLEAR. - LEFT MAIN APPROACH Y NUMBER OF SPANS 1 y SPAN TYPE - WSHO TOTAL LENGTH 25' SPAN TYPE - FHWA 101 000 MAXIMUM SPAN 22' tI CLEARANCES Y SR REVERSE CLEARANCE MIN. MAX. MIN. MAX. INDICATOR VERTICAL TOTAL HLRIZ. ' PAVEMENT WIDTH ' " RIGHT LEFT RIGHT LEFT . n'. t LATERAL UNDER ? t' + h mom„ Y qA"-"` ?-•... i .^.r •. .rp^'-:!'?f:''..: :' N„„fs,''?" 'r <..,. , «; f? '` R ft ?'r' °Si t lh, .i-a.(d} .,A ei? .:Y ?? •ati i.? ti? i CODER OF LAST CODING -72 DATE CF LAST CODING 8-04-72 DATE CF LAST CROSSING RECORD TRANSACTION 8-04-72 DATE CF LAST STRUCTURE RECORD TRANSACTION 8-04-72 DATE CF LAST CROSSING CONTROL FIELD CHANGE 8-04-72 DATE. CF LAST STRUCTURE CONTROL FIELD CHANGE z?, i ?fi!F$.?41P ?+:?!? ,s+r•?rN ., ?:ny? ,, r?,?y t.. r; t ? ? ? i?aa"rYt ` I :ea on. '?=' nur?.•warnLL:ca?ckdad>'w?' «4 w+a s:?r93?.?.??.: ' i'" R78631 BRIDGE DATA SUMMARY SHEET 1 OF 2 SR / SRMP 9315 8.15 T+ 1 ® 08/05/72 STRUCTURE ID a a ® MAIN KEY 16 093 15 008.15 00 009315104 SERIAL NUMBER SR104 CC C09315 CS 16 CSMP 8.15N QUILCENE 101 PLAN SEQ CS SEQ SEC T N, R WM ® YEAR BUILT LOADINGS (KIPS/AXLE) Yd , RECONSTRUCTION DESIGN LOAD LIFE EXPECTANCY INVENTORY RATING CONTRACT NUMBER/FLAG OPERATING RATING ® CODER - RESTRICTED LIST 1 MAIN LISTING FLAG LOAD LIST G. , 241 INVENTORY ROUTE PREFIX INSPECTION BASE YEAR ® NON INV. ROUTE PREFIX INSPECTION FREQUENCY SERIAL N0. OF MAIN LIST INSPECTION TYPE b d? q, - 1 STATE FUNCTIONAL CLASS LANE USE CODE FEDERAL FUNC. CLASS TYPE OF SERVICE ON/UNDER r` TOLL LANES ON CUSTODIAN/OWNER LANES UNDER ti ® 4 ADMIN. JURISDICTION MEDIAN 34 FEDERAL AID SYSTEM SKEW Y® 497 FEDERAL AID ROUTE NO. FLARE y ?k DEFENSE SECTION PAINT LIST 3® DEFENSE BRIDGE LETTER STEEL WEIGHT A DEFENSE MILEPOST GRID DECK k DEFENSE SECTION LENGTH LAST PAINT YEAR ® PHYSICAL VULNERABILITY NAVIGATION CONTROL w . 'LATITUDE 'NAV. CLEAR. VERTICAL . 'LONGITUDE 'NAV. CLEAR. HORIZONTAL yi ® 3 DISTRICT *SIDEWALK -RIGHT DIVISION 'SIDEWALK - LEFT a j 16 COUNTY 'CURB TO CURB ® CITY 'OUT TO OUT ® APPROACH RDWY. WIDTH ' "MIN. VERT. OVER BRIDGE DECK y>`' BYPASS DETOUR LENGTH I I'MIN. VERT. UNDER BRIDGE / LEGISLATIVE BR. NO. --'--"MIN. VERT. OVER INV. ROUTE 'tiA ;=r 770 ACT INV RT - YR 71 'MIN. LATERAL CLEAR. RIGHT -r' [? ;r ADT ON STR - YR 'MIN. LATERAL CLEAR. - LEFT MAIN APPROACH NUMBER OF SPANS F} i SPAN TYPE - WSHD TOTAL LENGTH fi SPAN TYPE - FHWA MAXIMUM SPAN µ CLEARANCES r SR REVERSE CLEARANCE -; MIN. MAX. MIN. MAX. INDICATOR fir " + s } VERTICAL e ,ti ® TOTAL HCRIZ. yaLt3ti-PAVEMENT WIDTH RIGHT LEFT RIGHT LEFT A w fi{ 4r- LATERAL UNDER d ° ur„v' ,, I del tf f ?f'" l' + , i , 7 ?y t t i i 4 y., r 1 "fl i 1 ? „an. ' C?[ 'm t r, - a xc k m, v ® R78631 BRIDGE DATA SUMMARY SHEET 2 OF 2 SR / SRMP 9315 39 s . 08/05/72 STRUCTURE ID ® CONTROL 16 093 15 000.39 00 9315001 MAIN KEY 16 093 15 000.39 00 SERIAL NUMBER LITTLE QUILCENE ''w u ,? of ng w+?: i CS 16 CSMP 0.39NJNCTSR101 PLA 7 ? N SEQ CS SEQ SEC ® , T N, R WM FEATURES INTERSECTED FACILITIES CARRIED ® INSPECTOR CONDITION APPRAISAL CODER 8 DECK 7 STRUCTURAL COND. - DATE 9 SUPERSTRUCTURE 4 DECK GEOMETRY UTILITIES S SUBSTRUCTURE 9 UNDERCLEARANCES 20 WEARING SURF ® . 8 CHAN. S CHAN. PROT. 8 SAFE LOAD CAPACITY EXP. JT. TYPE 8 RETAINING WALLS k ,. 8 WATERWAY ADEQUACY DECK SCALING 8 APPROACH ROADWAY 8 APPROACH ALIGN. ® INSPECTION REPORT CONDITION RATING 7 GEN . CONDITION STRINGERS BEARING DEVICES DECK LONGITUDINAL BEAMS PAINT SURFACING CAPS ABUTMENTS EXPANSION DAMS FLOORBEAMS 8 RETAINING WALLS CURBS ® TRUSSES INTERMEDIATE PIERS RAILS ARCHES = PIER PROTECTION SIDEWALKS GIRDERS E 8 APPROACH ROADWAY DRAINS RAIL TYPE ),. " PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS ® YEAR NEEDED TYPE OF SERVICE IMPROVEMENT YEAR ® TYPE CF WORK IMPROVEMENT TYPE L TOTALCOST IMPROVEMENT LENGTH PRELIM. ENGR. COST ® DESIGN LOAD DEMOLITION COST ROADWAY WIDTH STRUCTURE COST / NO. OF LANES ON/UNDER SUPERSTRUCTURE COST xi DESIGN ADT - YR PRIORITY ® UNDEFINED CROSSING DATA ® (GROUPS 1- 3 ) (GROUP 4- 7 ) a z >hr r `i (GROUPS 8-11 1 (GROUP 12-15 ) (GROUPS 16-19 ) Rr r _ (GROUP 20-21C) 1 UNDEFINED STRUCTURE (GROUP 1- 3) (GROUP 7-101 (GROUP 4- b a „ ? a (GROUP 11-12C) COD j ® ER OF LAST CODING 5-72 DATE CF LAST CODIN a r , G 8-04-72 DATE CF LAST CROSSING RECORD TRANSACTION 8-0 ® 4-72 DATE CF LAST STRUCTURE RECORD TRANSACTION o.-w4+t 8-04-72 DATE CF LAST CROSSING CONTROL FIELD CHANGE 8-04-72 DATE CF LAST STRUCTURE CONTROL FIELD CHA NGE .. d=. ir, .• s ® R78631 BRIDGE DATA SUMMARY SHEET 1 OF 2 SR / SRMP 9315 39 t I 08/05/72 STRUCTURE ID . CONTROL 16 093 15 000.39 00 9315001 MAIN KEY 16 093 15 000.39 00 c SERIAL NUMBER LITTLE QUILCENE CS 16 CSMP 0.39NJNCTSRIOI PLAN SEQ CS SEQ SEC . T N. R WM 55 YEAR BUILT LOADINGS (KIPS/AXLE) w. I 00 RECONSTRUCTION 2000 LIFE EXPECTANCY 5 DESIGN LOAD s ® 220 INVENTORY RATING CONTRACT NUMBER/FLAG 227 OPERATING RATING r ® CODER - RESTRICTED LIST 0 MAIN LISTING FLAG LOAD LIST 141 INVENTORY ROUTE PREFIX INSPECTION BASE YEAR ; ® NON INV. ROUTE PREFIX INSPECTION FREQUENCY SERIAL NO. OF MAIN LIST INSPECTION TYPE r STATE FUNCTIONAL CLASS FEDERAL FU LANE USE CODE NC. CLASS 15 TYPE OF SERVILE ON/UNDER ?A . 3 TOLL 33 CUSTODIAN/OWNER 4 ADMIN. JURISDICTION 02 LANES ON 00 LANES UNDER 0 MEDI 34 FEDERAL AID SYSTEM AN 19 SKEW 497 FEDERAL AID ROUTE NO. 0 FLARE . DEFENSE SECTION DEFEN PAINT LIST ® SE BRIDGE LETTER STEEL WEIGHT DEFENSE MILEPOST ? GRID DECK . DEFENSE SECTION LENGTH LAST PAINT YEAR k[ 3 ® PHYSICAL VULNERABILITY 0 NAVIGATION CONTROL _ . 'LATITUDE 000'NAV. CLEAR. VERTICAL t . 'LUNGITUDE 0000'NAV. CLEAR. HORIZONTAL i 3 DISTRICT OIVIS ION 16 COUNTY 0000 CITY 40 APPROACH RDWY. WIDTH 01 BYPASS DETOUR LENGTH / LEGISLATIVE BR. NO. 1489 ADT INV RT - YR 72 001489 ADT ON STR - YR 72 MAIN NUMBER OF SPANS 1 SPAN TYPE - WSHD SPAN TYPE - FHWA 105 3.9'SIDEWALK - RIGHT .O'SIDEWALK - LEFT 26.0'CURB TO CURB 28.31OUT TO OUT --'--"MIN. VERT. OVER BRIDGE DECK ' 011MIN. VERT. UNDER BRIDGE --'--"MIN. VERT. OVER INV. ROUTE --.-'MIN. LATERAL CLEAR. - RIGHT --.-'MIN. LATERAL CLEAR. - LEFT APPROACH TOTAL LENGTH 64' 000 MAXIMUM SPAN 44' CLEARANCES SR REVERSE CLEARANCE r MIN. MAX. MIN. MAX. INDICATOR `x VERTICAL TOTAL HCRIZ. r PAVEMENT WIDTH r??t RIGHT LEFT RIGHT LEFT LATERAL UNDER t T 'V tt k u Z F n ? ?4''?'+S 1 r 1;k t? >r !F E ? T ? utir?1l!4+ i 'S ? s1 k ? 3. ?, rv? i WW', L! 1 I 'y if. i 1r `1 °f 1. 7 Gyq`.t . r ?, Y r 5 i h '?K i1 + .r- t 7 ? p Y ! P b ?` ?: .. x I ,. tti $i t t * ? G a ? ? ?„' .,:? r .e,. ri,vxi?. - w. .s ,.. - ,. 'Swarrw n 3'r'3'a " a5tl ? "• ^, ? :.: : V STRUCTURE INVENTORY G APPRAISAL SHEET 89 PRIORITY BY DATE REPORT R78632 08/05/72 CODED - UPDATED UPDATED 5-72 CO ITION LI TTLE QUILCENE .93 15001 ND - APPRAISAL GEN. GEN. REVIEW _ _- - ID EPJTIF iCATION STRUCTURE DATA 1 STATE WASHINGTON 858 2 HIGHWAY DISTRICT 03 27 YEAR BUILT 55/00 3 COUNTY 016 28 LANES ON STR 02 UNDER 00 q 4 CITY/TOWN 0000 29 ACT 001489 . q 5 INVENTORY ROUTE 14109 3150 30 YEAR OF ADT. 1972 6 FEATURES INTERSECTED 31 DESIGN LOAD 5 n i 7 FACILITIES CARRIED 32 33 APP RDWY WIDTH W/SHLD 0401 BRIDGE MEDIAN 0 35 TR 30 * 8 STRUCTURE NO. 009315001 1.6 0000 UCTURE FLARED S y k 9 LOCATION 0.39NJNCTSRI01 36 ` i 10 11 INV. RT. MIDI. VERT. CL. 9 I T 9199x9 37 ! 12 I LEPOS 000.39 DEFENSE ROAD SECTION NO 38 39 NAVIGATION CONTROL NAV CL A 0 0 i a 13 . DEFENSE BRIDGE LETTER 40 . E R. VERT. NAV CLEA 000 ' t 14 DEFENSE SECTION MILEPOST . 41 . R.. HORIZ. 0000 r F 15 DEFENSE SECTION LENGTH • 42 TYPE OF SERVICE 15 16 LATITUDE 43 STRUCTURE TYPE - MAI N 105 17 LONGITUDE 44 STRUCTURE TYPE - APP. 000 e 18 PHYSICAL VULNERABILITY 45 N0. OF SPANS - MAIN 001 a Y 19 20 BYPASS DETOUR LENGTH TOLL 01 3 46 47 NO. OF SPANS - APP. 0000 21 CUSTODIAN 3 48 MAX. SPAN LENGTH 00448 22 OWNER 3 49 STRUCTURE LENGTH 000064' 23 +- F. A. PROJ. NO. 50 SIDEWALKS-RT 03.91-L T 00.01 51 DECK-CURB TO CURB 026.01 CL ASSIFICATION 52 DECK-OUT TO OUT 028.31 J 53 VERT. CL. OVER DECK 991991 °j 24 FEDERAL AID SYSTEM 07 54 UNDERCL. VERTICAL 00100x! ' 25 ADMINISTRATIVE JURISDICTION 4 55 UNDERCL. LATERAL RT. 99.9 26 FUNCTIONAL CLASS 56 UNDERCL. LATERAL LT. 99.90 r 57 WEARING SURF. MAIN-A PP. 20 q "r CONDITION MATERIAL ANALYSIS RATING , 58 DECK 8 59 SUPERSTR.UCTURT '---' -- s 60 6 _ SUBSTRUCTURE CHA C N ?ROT _ _ _ 1 62 N. E . HA . CULVERT E RETAIN WAl LS_-' - - 63 . REMAINING L i F E g SET-???R?6JjZ'A-?tbT?A4- == n x S 64 --- OPERATION RATINr'-= 227 66 _ INVENTORY RATING 8 220 r APPRAISAL Ni DEFICIE NCIES RATING x 67 STRUCTURAL CONDITION - -' '?--- 4R17d T wx d 69 DECK GEOMETRY = - ' _ _- ' __- -- - 4 l y + r 69 70 UNDERCLEAR.ANCE FRT.-T UT -_ S SAFE LOAD CAPACITY ____ -___-_-_ 71 - WATERWAY ADEQUACY --- "- -' - `---- - 8 g r 72 APPROACH ROADWAY ALTUR _-' _ -__ _ _ 8 + PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS COS T OF PROPOSED IMPROV EMENTS 5 x p. 73 YEAR NEEDED 84 TOTAL COST 4 X 3 t ;F 74 75 TYPE OF SERVICE T F O 35 PRELI M. ENGR. COST 5 '•j Y? 76 YPE O RK W IMPROVE. LENGTH 86 87 DEMOL SUBST ITION COST RUCTURE COST S 77 7 DESIGN LOADING AY W AD D 38 SUPER STRUCTURE COST ` u 8 W TH RO I as 79 80 NUMBER OF LANES ADT 81 YEAR DESCRIBE (ITEM 751 _? _ _ B, . „ 82 RDWY. IMPROVE. YEAR •'W , _ H 89 PRIORITY STRUCTURE INVENTORY E APPRAISAL SHEET BY DATE REPORT R78632 08/05/72 CODED - UPDATED -72 SR104 OC C09315 009315104 INSPECTED - CONDITION - APPRAISAL - --- GEN. REVIEW IDENTIFICATION STRUCTURE DATA F 1 STATE WASHINGTON 858 2 HIGHWAY DISTRICT 03 27 YEAR BUILT / 3 COUNTY 016 28 LANES ON STR UNDER 4 CITY/TOWN 29 ADT 5 INVENTORY ROUTE 241093150 30 YEAR OF ADT 19 'd 6 FEATURES INTERSECTED 31 DESIGN LOAD 32 APP RDWY WIDTH W/SHLD ' 7 FACILITIES CARRIED 33 BRIDGE MEDIAN =. 34 SKEW ? 8 STRUCTURE NO. 009315104 160000 35 STRUCTURE FLARED 9 LOCATION 8.15N OUILCENE 101 36 10 INV. RT. MIN. VERT. CL. 99'99-' 37 11 MILEPOST 008.15 38 NAVIGATION CONTROL 12 DEFENSE ROAD SECTION NO. 39 NAV. CLEAR. VERT. 13 DEFENSE BRIDGE LETTER 40 NAV. CLEAR. HORIZ. ' 14 DEFENSE SECTION MILEPOST 41 ?,- 15 DEFENSE SECTION LENGTH 16 LATITUDE ' 7 N ITU E ' 42 TYPE OF SERVICE 43 STRUCTURE TYPE - MAIN T CT Y G D 1 LO 18 PHYSICAL VULNERABILITY 44 S RU URE T PE - APP. 45 NO. OF SPANS - MAIN 1 19 BYPASS DETOUR LENGTH 46 NO. OF SPANS - APP. , 21 C 48 USTODIAN MAX. SPAN LENGTH ' 2_2 OWNER 49 STRUCTURE LENGTH ' 23 F. A. PROJ. NO. 50 SIDEWALKS-RT '-LT ' DECK-CURB TO CU 5 B CLASSIFICATION 1 R 52 DECK-OUT TO OUT 24 FEDERAL AID SYSTEM 07 53 VERT. CL. OVER DECK 54 UNDERCL. VERTICAL 25 ADMINISTRATIVE JURISDICTION 4 55 UNDERCL. LATERAL RT. ' 26 FUNCTIONAL CLASS 56 UNDERCL. LATERAL LT. ' ' 57 WEARING SURF. MAIN-APP. CONDITION MATERIAL 58 DECK ANALYSIS RATING -? 59 SUPERSTP UCTU- -_ - , _?--- 60 SUB TRUCTU E ___-__- R S E CHAK _vmT 61 CHAP -`-- '-- --? d . . WACC 62 CULVERT & RETAIN ';-? ,_ - . . 63 REMAINING LIFE 64 OPERATION RATINU-_-- 66 INVENTORY RATING _ - y APPRAISAL RATING DEFICIENCIES 67 STRUCTURAL CONDITION -'------ - --- " K. 68 DECK GEOMETRY 69 UNDERCLEARANCE'S---V :T.-t-CAT.- _ _- ? .. - '+ a S r - 70 SAFE LOAD CAPACITY --?- ____ ------ - - g - ? 71 WATERWAY ADEQUACY 7 APPROACH ROADWAY AM FI:-??? ? ? ??--_-_ ? ?. PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS COST OF PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS £ 73 YEAR NEEDED 84 TOTAL COST E 74 TYPE OF SERVICE 85 P RELIM. ENGR. COST 75 TYPE OF WORK 86 DEMOLITION COST 76 IMPROVE LENGTH 87 SUBSTRUCTURE COST 1 o . 77 DESIGN LOADING 88 SUPERSTRUCTURE COST 7 f 78 ROADWAY WIDTH 79 NUMBER OF LANES DESCRIBE (ITEM 75)_ _ t 80 AUT 81 YEAR ---- _----_??-_- S B]_ RDWY. IMPROVE. YEAR 83 RDWY. IMPROVE. TYPE ?-- i '? REMARKS __---_--` - ----- --- - _- ____ n ?' ? '? r ? a ?1??'?. yf? ?.. :?:: ti?'.a. r?,^?.?,'+???;.?'l'•'1. r'.F=1k'tr-:.1 :N ? ??' h 5 ? _ r { "?' Lac - - ?r V? ??? ,.. +.??.? ._IM..._ 'UDY.. _?... ?rV5U i_", .;ii,?u5?+ ??" 4 ..-hTJ317i??. .5??°C?31?'=' r W q ' ® STRUCTURE INVENTORY G APPRAISAL SHEET REPORT R78632 08/05/72 89 PRIORITY BY DATE CODED - UPDATED -72 INSPECTED - I ' s y I r ° ® ® I ® ® PORTAGF. CANAL 009527004 IDENTIFICATION 1 STATE WASHINGTON 853 2 HIGHWAY DISTRICT 03 3 COUNTY 016 4 CITY/TOWN 0000 5 INVENTORY ROUTE 141095270 6 FEATURES INTERSECTED 7 FACILITIES CARRIED 8 STRUCTURE NO. 009527004 160000 9 LOCATION 1.57E JNCT FAS9415 10 INV. RT. MIN. VERT. CL. 99'99° 11 MILEPOST 001.57 12 DEFENSE ROAD SECTION NO. 13 DEFENSE BRIDGE LETTER CONDITION _- GENRAREVLEW STRUCTURE DATA _ 27 YEAR BUILT 51/00 28 LANES ON STR 02 UNDER 00 29 ACT 002195 30 YEAR OF ACT 1972 31 DESIGN LOAD 5 32 APP RDWY WIDTH W/SHLD 030' 33 BRIDGE MEDIAN 0 34 SKEW 00 35 STRUCTURE FLARED 0 36 37 38 NAVIGATION CONTROL 1 39 NAV. CLEAR. VERT. 057' 40 NAV. CLEAR. HORIZ. 0140' v f p a y r ® 14 DEFENSE SECTION MILEPOST 15 DEFENSE SECTION LENGTH 16 LATITUDE ' 17 LONGITUDE ' 13 PHYSICAL VULNERABILITY 20 TOLLSS DETOUR LENGTH 99 3 21 CUSTODIAN 3 22 OWNER 3 23 F. A. PROJ. NO. --? CLASSIFICATION 41 42 43 44 45 46 4 48 49 50 51 52 53 TYPE OF SERVICE 15 STRUCTURE TYPE - MAIN 305 STRUCTURE TYPE - APP.. 204 NO. OF SPANS - MAIN 003 NO. OF SPANS - APP. 0002 MAX. SPAN LENGTH 0250' STRUCTURE LENGTH 000670' SIDEWALKS-RT 02.0'-LT 02.0' DECK-CURB TO CURB 022.0' DECK-OUT TO OUT 026.0' VERT. CL. OVER DECK 99'99" t i i 3 y £ z - .4 ® ® ! 24 FEDERAL. AID SYSTEM 07 25 ADMINISTRATIVE JURISDICTION 4 26 FUNCTIONAL CLASS CONDITION MATERIAL 58 DECK 59 SUPERSTRUCTURF~ 60 SUBSTRUCTURE 61 CHAN. E CHAN.-PiM. 62 CULVERT L RETAIN. WALLS +?-_--? 63 REMAINING LIFE 73- 64 OPERATION RATIN' _ 227 54 UNDERCL. VERTICAL 001001, 55 UNDERCL. LATERAL RT. 99.9' 56 UNDERCL. LATERAL LT. 99.9' 57 WEARING SURF. MAIN-APP. 11 ANALYSIS RATING 8 N 8 7 ?'-' 8 o5-AfiLkiSALA-?iSAbAA4 ?_ 8 66 INVENTORY RATING 220 y y , r qi nu .. ® APPRAISAL DEFICIENCIES RATING 67 STRUCTURAL CONDITION 7 68 DECK GEOMETRY 6 I 69 l1NDERCLEARANCET-QE1F7- E-CAT. _ ??_ N 70 SAFE LOAD CAPACITY 8 71 WATERWAY ADEQUACY 8 72 APPROACH ROADWAY ALFA: A PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS COST OF PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS 73 YEAR NEEDED 84 TOTAL COST $ 74 75 TYPE OF SERVICE TYPE OF WORK 85 86 PRELIM. ENGR. COST DEMOLITION COST 76 IMPROVE. LENGTH 87 SUBSTRUCTURE COST 77 78 DESIGN LOADING ROADWAY WIDTH 88 SUPERSTRUCTURE COST da q?i• 79 NUMBER OF LANES DT 81 YEAR DESCRIBE (ITEM 75) n' , r 00 A , f"r 82 ROWY. IMPROVE. YEAR v 83 RDWY. IMPROVE. TYPE ; RE MARN,S _ -________- = ? ? _... -- --------- - -- - ------ - - - --- 44 }r t _ 41, J? E ?z Jy STRUCTURE INVENTORY 6 APPRAISAL SHEET 89 PRIORITY A REPORT R78632 08/05/72 CODED BY DATE x UPDATED 5-72 CHIPIACUM INSPECTED - 009517003 CONDITION - 1 3 ! APPRAISAL • IDENTIFICATION GEN. REVIEW - ?7t qi ® STRUCTURE DATA 1 STATE WASHINGTON 858 2 HIGHWAY DISTRICT 03 27 YEAR BUILT 16/53 4 COTY%TOWM 016 28 LANES ON STR 02 UNDER 00 4 0 5 INVENTORY ROUTE 14109500 29 ADT 1070 30 YEAR OF ADT 001972. 6 FEATURES INTERSECTED 31 DESIGN LOAD s 32 APP RDWY WIDTH W/SHLD 034- 7 FACILITIES CARRIED 33 BRIDGE MEDIAN 0 I j 8 STRUCTURE NO. 009517003 160000 34 SKEW 35 STRUCTURE FLARED 00 p 9 LOCATION 0.29W FAS9415 36 ?j ,:?,r?"•-?, ® 70 INV. RT. MIN. VERT. LL. 99199° 37 I MILEPOST 006.79 38 NAVIGATION CONTROL 0 12 DEFENSE ROAD SECTION NO. 39 NAV. CLEAR. VERT. 000. Y4 { 13 DEFENSE BRIDGE LETTER 40 NAV. CLEAR. HORIZ. 00000 14 DEFENSE SECTION MILEPOST 41 5 15 DEFENSE ESECTION LENGTH 42 TYPE OF SERVICE 15 43 STRUCTURE TYPE - MAIN ` 101 17 LONGITUDE 44 STRUCTURE TYPE - APP. 000 ' 4 ' L8 PHYSICAL VULNERABILITY 45 NO. OF SPANS - MAIN 001 4Z ® 20 BYPASS DETOUR LENGTH 01 47 NO. OF SPANS - APP. 0000 eft. 21 CUSTODIAN 3 48 MAX. SPAN LENGTH 00300 22 OWNER 3 49 STRUCTURE LENGTH 0000331 ® 23 F. A. PROJ. NO. 50 SIDEWALKS-RT 00.0--LT 04.9- 5l DECK-CURB TO CURB 030.01 CLASSIFICATION 52 DECK-OUT TO OUT 037.01 24 FEDERAL A 53 VERT. CL. OVER DECK 99-999 C" ® ID SYSTEM 07 54 UNDERCL. VERTICAL 0010010 25 ADMINISTRATIVE JURISDICTION 4 55 UNDERCL. LATERAL RT. 99.91 26 FUNCTIONAL CLASS 56 UNDERCL. LATERAL LT. 99.91 ti CONDITION 57 WEARING SURF. MAIN-APP. 20 ® 58 DECK MATERIAL ANALYSIS RATING 3 h =" 59 SUPERSTRUCTURE - - N w ® 60 SUBSTRUCTURE -_- - 8 61 CHAN. E CHAN.-'70T -- . 8 62 CULVERT E RETAIN. WA --- -? 63 REMAINING LIFE RTA-CR-RUAN q--- 215 8 r ® 64 OPERATION ? RATIN220 66 INVENTORY RATING - APPRAISAL r DEFICIENCIES RATING ®67 STRUCTURAL CONDITION 7 68 DECK GEOMETRY -'--?-?---------- 6 69 UNDF.RCLEARANCES =-PEAT. E?CAT -- N 1 70 SAFE LOAD CAPACITY 71 WATERWAY ADEQUACY ------ 8 72 APPROACH ROADWAY ALTS------- 8 - PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS CCST OF PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS " ® 73 YEAR NEEDED 84 TOTAL COST $ + 74 TYPE OF SERVICE 85 PRELIM. ENGR. COST 75 TYPE OF WORK 86 DEMOLITION COST 76 IMPROVE. LENGTH 87 SUBSTRUCTURE COST 1 Lt' a` ® 77 DESIGN LOADING 88 SUPERSTRUCTURE COST 7B ROADWAY WIDTHw 79 NUMBER OF LANES m DESCRIBE (ITEM 75)-__ F ti 9 ® 90 ADT 61 YEAR - ---- ----- -? 82 RDWY. IMPROVE. YEAR 83 RDWY. IMPROVE. TYPE RE MARK S__..-----__---- ... !I %I?Iiljji :I, ? r ?? ?• .x 7 }far y y ?? `, ry ?., v 4 ??la . 1 1 1 .I r? ?.. + J1..t??^ J+y r 1 + ?'', f?+ 4? L 1 n J i Y •)r ? t h h1y I?(?' + ? .r J II 1 5 ? ? J ', a eW _.s.st. :e- -.... _...a ..ait8s3Lm7'''1R" ,.' `"+J]?_iSrilzlZHo.YE- _.- •r 89 PRIORITY r STRUCTURE INVENTORY C APPRAISAL SHEET BY DATE t tip; REPORT 878632 08/05/72 CODED - UPDATED 5-72 INSPECTED `h YARR 009415002 CONDITION = t APPRAISAL t GEN. REVIEW _ IDENTIFICATION r STRUCTURE DATA 1 STATE WASHINGTON 858 2 HIGHWAY DISTRICT 03 27 YEAR BUILT 55/00 3 COUNTY 016 28 LANES ON STR 02 UNDER 00 j 4 CITY/TOWN 0000 29 ADT 001605 5 INVENTORY ROUTE 141094150 30 YEAR OF ACT 1972 6 FEATURES INTERSECTED 31 DESIGN LOAD 4 32 APP RDWY WIDTH W/SHLD 0261 7 FACILITIES CARRIED 33 BRIDGE MEDIAN 0 8 STRUCTURE NO. 009415002 160000 35 STRUCTURE FLARED 00 9 LOCATION 7.45N JNCT FAS9315 36 -'i 10 INV. RT. MIN. VERT. CL. 9919911 37 11 MILEPOST 008.78 38 NAVIGATION CONTROL 0 • 12 DEFENSE ROAD SECTION NO. 39 NAV. CLEAR. VERT. 0001 13 DEFENSE BRIDGE LETTER 40 NAV. CLEAR. HORIZ. 0000' a 14 DEFENSE SECTION MILEPOST 41 15 DEFENSE SECTION LENGTH 42 TYPE OF SERVICE 15 16 LATITUDE 43 STRUCTURE TYPE - MAIN 101 17 LONGITUDE 44 STRUCTURE TYPE - APP. 000 °i 18 PHYSICAL VULNERABILITY 45 NO. OF SPANS - MAIN 001 20 TOLL SS DETOUR. LENGTH 11 46 47 NO. OF SPANS - APP. 0000 21 CUSTODIAN 3 48 MAX. SPAN LENGTH 0022- 22 OWNER 3 49 STRUCTURE LENGTH 0000251 I a 23 F. A. PROJ. NO. 50 SIDEWALKS-RT 00.01-LT 00.01 ?.. 51 DECK-CURB TO CURB 026.91 CLASSIFICATION 52 DECK-OUT TO OUT 030.01 53 VERT. CL. OVER DECK 99199° 24 FEDERAL AID SYSTEM 07 54 UNDERCL. VERTICAL 0010015 25 ADMINISTRATIVE JURISDICTION 4 55 UNDERCL. LATERAL RT. 99.9- 26 FUNCTIONAL CLASS 56 UNDERCL. LATERAL LT. 99.91 f,ONDITION 57 WEARING SURF. MAIN-APP. 20 MATERIAL ANALYSIS RATING 58 DK 59 SUPERSTRUCTURT 8 s! 7 60 SUBSTRUCTURE 8 61 CHAN. C CHAN.-PT-'-__??_?_-_ 8 e rg 62 CULVERT C RETAIN. WAELS _?__--?' ----- 8 11 63 REMAINING L I F E ?&--'b?-AY ?j?1FdAlgp7?q- 8 64 OPERATION RATINST________ 227 66 INVENTORY RATING 220 APPRAISAL DEFICIENCIES RATING A` 67 STRUCTURAL CONDITION 68 DICK GEOMETRY __ 7 69 UNDFRCLEARANCES VLiFT`?L?Y. N 70 SAFE LOAD CAPACITY 71 WATERWAY ADEQUACY -'- 8 72 APPROACH ROADWAY ALTZ`iFl.-='-- PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS COST OF PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS s 73 YEAR NEEDED 84 TOTAL COST E 74 TYPE OF SERVICE 85 PRELIM. ENGR. COST 75 TYPE OF WORK 86 DEMOLITION COST 76 IMPROVE. LENGTH 87 SUBSTRUCTURE COST h 77 DESIGN LOADING 88 SUPERSTRUCTURE COST 78 ROADWAY WIDTH 5^f 79 NUMBER OF LANES DESCRIBE (ITEM 75)--- A0 ACT 81 YEAR - +* 82 ROWY. IMPROVE. YEAR -- ---"'--- --M----- 83 ROWY. IMPROVE. TYPE ??-'-- REMARKS_ t? . 77;,7" 7 r r, N 'o a 11 ! r 5 .r t qj. ? drv4? J ?' t , ?vi COUNTY ROAD ADMINISTRATION BOARD ?. 106 MAPLE PARK OLYMPIA. WASHINGTON 98501 TELEPHONE ADMINISTRATIVE ENGINEER 2.6-7.3.65T6 kA? April 12, 1972 E i neers ng TO: All County FROM: Ernest Geissler // RE: County Bridge Needs 1 a; h You will recall that after the first complete county bridge inspection which was ' completed prior to July 1, 1970, a complete tabulation was made showing all L county bridges and a breakdown of deficient bridges. A copy of this tabulation was included in the last CRAB report and is attached ' k for your information. This is obviously a matter of considerable importance and it would be interesting to include a similar tabulation in this year's report to show what the situation is as of July 1972. The number of deficient bridges reported should reflect the situation as of July 1, 1972, except that any bridges definitely scheduled for replacement c during 1972 should no longer be reported as deficient. Will you please fill in the blanks on the bottom of the attached sheet and return f it to this office as soon'as possible. r EG:mlc (rI3fCCC(OM k?rlL& h e /.SRIP6C SC° i ??13 tt?.IS SufSilciTl c D - ,. ... ., _,_ .15D. . Rpm= a 1 W /. I " COUNTY ROAD ADMINISTRATION BOARD 100 MAPLE PARK OLYMPIA, WASHINGTON 98501 .1 THE TELEPHONE ADMINISTRATIVE ENGINEER 206. 753-6578 April 6, 1972 TO: All County Engineer , FROM: Ernest Geissler ? ar V - RE: State of Washington Inventory of Bridges & Structures (SWIBS) In late March, each county engineer received the Recording and Coding Manual from the Department of Highways to be used in making a statewide bridge inventory. The cover letter indicates that inventory information on all bridges is to be furnished to the district state aid engineers no later than June 1, 1972. This matter was discussed at length during the meeting of the C. R. A. B. on March 31. It was the consensus of the Board that 60 days was insufficient time for most county engineers to furnish this information on all bridges especially in the Spring when pre-construction engineering activity is at is peak. The Federal Highway Administration is asking for the inventory for all deficient bridges on the Federal-Aid system to be completed no later than July 1, 1972. As far as the County Road Administration Board is concerned, all counties in Washington had completed an adequate bridge inventory on all systems by July 1, 1970, in compliance with the CRAB Standard WAC 136-20. The only discrepancy with Federal regulations is that the counties did not record the inventory information on standard forms. Reflecting a desire to comply with Federal requirements, but also recognizing the practicalities of the situation,' the County Road Administration Board directed this letter to be sent to all county engineers setting forth the position of the Board with respect to SWIBS: 1. Every effort should be made to submit the required inventory information on deficient bridges on the FAS system before the deadline of June 1, 1972, since this information may be needed at national level to determine local bridge needs, 2. It should be noted that the Federal Highway Administration is requesting inventory information on all bridges on the FAS system by June 1, 1973. This Board questions the justification for this request and will ask Federal and/or state officials to appear before the Board at a future meeting to diecuRS the necessity of gathering this information. .40.. J 7 c _ 1 V, "N . , Page _2- All Engineers Apr, 6, 1972 3. It is noted that the State Highway Department is offering to catalogue in the state's computer system the inventory information on all county bridges in order that a complete inventory is available when and if needed by any agency. The Board will request further information from the Department about this proposal in an attempt to ascertain what benefits might accrue to counties by their participation. a It should be understood that the foregoing represents the position of the County Road Administration Board and is advisory in nature at this time as far as the counties are concerned. Each county engineer is free to make arrangements different from those outlined above if he feels it is to the advantage of his county for him to do so. The only mandatory item is contained in Item 1 above. The Board is most interested in receiving comments from individual engineers as to its position in this matter. EG:rnlc •S t . ,ErF WASHINGTON STATE .40 ?w F IGHWAY COMMISSION "G,1 °`-"°y"nrr ?•-?? I ? G.L Andrews -Director -, DEPARTMENT Of HIGHWAYS Hlghwey Adm,nien -i- awiding Olymple, W-hir,g- 98504 (206) 753-6000 Miami) 20, 1972 r st ? lr . r ? T0: AlI County Engineers r)r,ut s All City y{ h t FROM: J. L. Thornton, P.E ! State Aid Engineer 1 SJEJEC-i: Stint, o'r 41. 1 iw,ton liwentory of Oric19es an,S Strur,tures -: (Sl11sS) ftecr,r imt and Codh,g Manual; Y%';-lU(HB) n a c t! >t IaS r,?nurl I.o asr,ist in coding infortnii:ic,n Y it t co,".-At.; as C?ty trid rs so tita: Vwly dill hr. included in the r:.( t..,. nrid,_ as recu Frnrl try•. -,•, cra1 law. (See App%.rdic:(:s G-! ;,i' thr. S?if,s 14t•^wal). - ' r ?r .. - .. ,. t,,,:) ', i,t' (;(): UI• i r(.fR{ .?iiJ,, il.fs Ib hVi,l iN.G: f i3; t r c :t A EI I , I J' t. i-,r••., ,. ( r ( ( ttzxh !( I( :,I yJJC jt: •'i\rli,;Lt )Il JI' l-tt 71 )t fC f)r e_;, r, f•r 1 ?. r t- ssi t,,2, l rr or ' r%.1lrlri+n ( 1 o fl 1 It n,1 it:. -f 1?. I , ,arr.. 1 (.-_ah q,'rr.4: r , s ?? 4 •? t (s c,. ?...t .I.c,t In Se.. lun 1 I, Ph.: A ( Ir tt,;nu >n :t 7 ? .,. • A!x. .t:a!lubL: fr n r_ 6) I(.L tai Aid Enginc.G, (b tP-J f rrl '. ( JO'1 n- ? r ° r-; •' ' LL. . ., c ., .,. u?t t• rt ( . r Ptnt )( I q r. ttt 9liicit ray b nv r JI). ? iI 's _ t c r, r •;. t r t. ) ,.n+ r r n.I (Jt •"; ,,,. yt G , •, f l15':: _( b 1., for r? r `1 rs q M r (_. ? i 1 l` Tim (nrrt,-,,; tlr :w l in Stc t lrn + o` :mr !N;f!S '"a:(a 1 arc for the n „ - "" i r ,i)t ?? ?: .:-• '•: t(: n. c:7. L; in 7i1 tr.: ..: t 1: ?r i r , 1 cnc c :, i t or „n t r al ru t r .,),1 ut •r , v. h, I add:-,', b 1J 71. a ll L):v!f:C.•1 Iy ? ; tr ! , n t - ;( -.. l,, In t r I (U:,Cfnlrc53 I °" ?} ? i6 of ti t k t [.;.,p u t. c. ir, f I tional, •. ,d „,,,y be t:,.cd by 9^,y I ' t ? ? i r: r . -f .., .... .I:• x J i t!t,,, rn;'rtA s'iOn r(ii i.lu le in 1 ,y ?l' faA,• f,• Y. .,,.,, 11, nlrl it 1,h 1"I", N' Rupp Iii I h'r .1 11 I'. ,Arr L. ( I, I Ia 1 ! I nt. )s,r 1'e lh? .l al ? n r r> > I) ? ??"? +>?? ( ° D u a - ! „?Yl `? t F a al Nff A ?e,7 I i F• r O al la?h1?'m?lt'?)t,?11 ? !?,) ,i,l'•I( y '?r?l?( .'.1 wln? t,'• S??°f??xS,fE? ?? : µP?•? " 4 t r E.',rf ' ? ? !? L f( I - ,a? OEM >r , { •s p _ ?um j?? u , i f All County Engineers and All City Engineers ; March 20, 1972 Page - 2 The District State Aid Engineer will distribute the coding instructions for the last 4 rows of the coding form as soon as they are available. The first three rows of the forms should be filled out as described in the SWISS Manual and returned to the District State Aid Engineer as soon as 1 a? possible, but no later than June 1, 1972• It is essential that the codes specified in the SWISS manual be used to fill out the coding forms. The SWISS manual is based on the FHWA Recording and Coding Guide for the Structure Inventory and Appraisal of the Nation's Bridges { April 1971, but some of the codes have been expanded to increase the usability w, of the system. }{ 4i 1 All differences between the two systems will be corrected by the computer for information sent to the Federal Government. (The computer will assume all a input to be in SWISS codes, and will change the output to FHWA codes, there- fore the SWISS codes must be used for input). The computer printed "Structure Inventory and Appraisal Sheet" (Appendix E of the SWISS manual) will be printed using FHWA codes and returned to the counties ar,d cities. This sheet contains all the coded information required by the Federal Government for each bridge. All written information required to complete HWY Form 234-004 (Appendix D) must be filled in by the individual agencies before these forms will be,considered for any listing of deficient k bridges. ,r s; The counties and cities will also receive a computer printed "Bridge Data Summary Sheet" which will list all the information the computer has concerning } each bridge. This sheet will be printed out using SWISS codes. The State will notify the counties and cities as to exactly what extra infor- x a r'r mat ion is required on deficient bridges as soon as the guidelines are received from the Federal Highway Administration. 4 Any questions regarding the use or interpretation of the SWISS manual should r _ AuH'w r be directed to the District State Aid Engineer. q,l cc: J. P. Clark Ernest Geissler Art Giffin H. R. Goff ii. M, Foster W. T. Robertson L. M. Robertson y 6 tis 1 F -',? 1•f 1. AsQVllB.IYA WASHINGTON STATE HIGHWAY COMMISSION " DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS n r r Highway Admi-t-i- 6.11Cing Olympia, Woahington 66504 (2061 753.6000 .j 1 ( Uanicl I (t•ans - Go "Mor G.11.:1ndmlys-Director 3 tt '??'' X11 May 4, 1972 % V .b ? TO: All County Engineers and All City Engineer?I I( FROM: J. L. Thornton I' ` SUBJECT: State of Washington Inventory of Bridges and Structures art Reference is made to our letter of March 20, 1972, transmitting the d State of Washington Inventory of Bridges and Structures Manual and Instructions for Inventory and Appraisal of Bridges. i finis letter needs some clarification in that it was neglected to inform h { you t at the July 1, 1972 deadline pertained to those bridges which were wu defined as deficient bridges over waterways and other topographical barriers. The remainder of the bridges on your system should be inventoried `• and appraised prior to July 1, 1973. These rules apply only to those bridges on federal aid systems; however, it is hoped and encouraged that you will also include bridges on other than federal aid systems so that you will have a complete inventory record of all of your structures. There has been a change in federal requirements relative to inventory and coding of the structures falling under the category of deficient bridges and the new form and instructions are being made up, which you Yn will have in your hands soon after you receive this letter. There appears to be continued interest in the Federal Bridge Replacement Program and it is hoped that some of the bridges in our state will be eligible for funding under the Bridge Replacement Program. To date we have been successful in obtaining $3,448,000 of special bridge replace- ` meet funds for the Pasco-Kennewick Bridge. Currently we are acquiring federal funds to rehabilitate a Crays Harbor County bridge which will cost approximately $120,000.00. I - ? ! 7 ? 1.r1 I ! 4 r,i I s y `r.X i Sc ` u@i?,l• ,, ??a n h yr, y? ° "+ 31,E sr t `k ) t t , i" r a,, I ?"ki r ' r' v,? a I" s'• ,'rL{ d t t . n fl _ 5, 1 1 "4 . All County Engineers S City Engineers May 4, 1972 Page 2 orb ?& National figures on deficient bridges indicate that the majority of such bridges are not on any federal aid system. It is recommended that any of your deficient bridges not on the federal aid system be ; reported at this time, which will be of value to the Federal Highway Administration in their approach to Congress for continuance of the Bridge Replacement Program. JLT:vr RON cc: J. P. Clark E. Geissler k" - Art Giffin H. R. Goff 45; W. M. Foster W. T. Robertson L. M. Robertson A , iv ? w 5,? r>. 4 dMn;. y td?.Gi?'??d k7.?TNltsw.SM; ?. +M d J" "?'1Sk '4., ?i + ± r ?' 70 i?y e ? ' d ?t ? ? ?y 1 t •?• ? 7ti? I 5 g WASHINGTON STATE /. C ?n- H I G H W A Y COMMISSION 1 Daniel I. Evans -Governor 1 - GH.Andrews -Director DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS -mod 4 Highway Admini-recon a.iiCn9 . }? •` t ?- Olymp e, Waehingcon BB504 (2061 ,3_6000 P t?w I'ay 9, 1972 a r As ?i TO: ALL U1.711'f ALI. CITY Eir;I1F I:5' $ r !.11};. J. That nton r ly { 4 SI%!:JEC:: Stacc of i;ashinnton Inter, `ory of i,ridges and Siructures .4 - •ih^ Federal Government: i;as new i. ti 1 a-.oiled instructions speC4rving the requires?.its for submitting ilr''cir 'ton.brut defirient federal-aid bridges ft ;r consideration under the r t !r r r p . ar,.i en I: Program. as _ Th F!!,1 iat ca,al l;ridle n,, tn,r,ards r•oouire !rsrec ion and inren,o t-e Cnr:;lezed for all d, rterf 'n^i:i _ sid h, ;?st::r: e r .;ren•ra•,s and other t(, in !p!,k l i:wri;:r•s" by Jalvnial1972.! tlaubse- r n yr ' it corrunical;-J.n with Fl !,;A officials has added •anv railroad bridges - ? i ?r r .l-nic! ro.luPS :IVC!r ci' ., LiC1U1'c1ly deficient or, ryeGi i_Cr1Ca11Y r .:,t, rti;e to the hig!n;ay ::hcu1(• „lso be submitted (:;s deficient hricges) b,• July 1, 1`172. The PIP, has rcr•,rrre.' Llta: tits i Nentory in;nrmatinn be submitted to them on CO pater card; punched accordino to a specified fomat and rouped according to deficiency priori ties "A" ";;" ;nJ 'C', (For a descritiLion OF these oriorit, lc,ignatir.•n,, sL°a field 158, i . t.Le.6ied instructions.) 'oil irtg the !an : on tic S!165 Coding Form.. „ all :R? counties and cities np d do in order Lo r r; q ly .ii Lh t'iis requirement. a !n ad-.1iFron to the rnln(•.hnri (;n,:nutnr cards, '.he F!I!IP, is ,,cnunrl a Corn'::Ced ?r4 I r e 11 1 (11!,( Fc,rm 234-f t, Pr i r'tn ?, of t.1) s 11F a:na 11 for each deficient y hr idg. sub-,.11 tted , plus a htrt nzrl atl, reeorl: fo, n h at dw giver, priori ty Y:t F 1101". rh,. F11V has also nrioa.,od tle r,u;:iher OF ite,l, ? Plate 14-1 sheet t9hieh are requir01 to he ceder! for the (.omouter. 1 y,, a in :.rzcn t•a bring the S!4111S V;niual up to data, Ut? fcllouinp revisions and dc;itiars have ILe,:n atacked: I F i r' L-9, (C1 Ca to replace existini nags 2-9. The new sheet ' -kt F ..tins r more. I:aaiicit deflnIP.ion of Cy-Pass Pi, Om, Longth, F'i•ad ? ,?- 3 '' Lem 1S). s ? 2-25 thrrru,h 21-P Lo b% arl!.d to Ghp Knurl followIn(I Y' sl•C:ss ru tar cr.,t,'n t.,ui,ctions for °63' r .y t, i r r ;r; 15, gSL r r a ?dsfi!>??+ + ?x lY ? a? l '' o,til•, r,• f ro,..'.:'.: t Y„ -n d m y? w ?, ?}•r a ' { '?J 9L. Cr, t , ? K '? ? rc?I t r t§YQl ?1t'.. A ? f I 9 'wi?* tra , y z -^rwm {Sl M r ?: ?' yl ..9.U tlx'L Fi F ? "ti r r 1„til r ? Y?1 Y ?? r F t `.r >, t >, '? i r. v i it 1 t , I?? Fr r { it Yr ff lI LI - t L t .Z, r L g Y r11 r ,f { t i ? M.. ? ??1 i ` J All County Engineers and All r. q. City Engineers P M € age Two May 9, 1972 0' 3. III•lY Form 234-005, sheet 2 of 2 of the SNIBS Coding Forms. These sheets are to be used t c 4 o code the additional information required for deficient federal-aid bridges and returned to the District State Aid Engineer as soon as possible. 4. Appendix title page, (Cl flay 72), to replace the existing title page. This page has been revised t i I M o nclude the folloting revised appendices. g. 5, Appendix D, (Cl flay 72), to replace existing Appendix D. This is the revised 1114Y Form 234-004 Plate 14 1 fi ,N , - , changed to include the latest FIINA additions , 6 . Appendices E-1 and E-2, to replace existing Appendix E. Appendix E-1 is the revised computer printed Plate 14-1 h s? u ± , c anged to include the FHNA additions. Note that this page has been completed by hand a an example of h t s w a needs to be done for deficient bridges . Appendix E-2 is a sample narrative, written as an example for bridges in deficiency priority "A" r as 7 . 7. Appendices F-1 and F-2, replace existing Appendix F. Appendix F-1 is a nest sample sheet 1 of th s,. e SWIBS Coding Forms (MlY Form 234-003) , Appendix F-2 is sheet 2 of the SHIES Coding Forms (HWY Form 234-005 and is required to be filled out for deficient b id r ges. Note that the computer printed Plate 14-1 in Appendix E-1 is a result of the infor- mation coded on the sam le di p co ng forms of Appendices F-1 and F-2 . The following table and notes are included to info i y requ rm you concerning the FHWA rements and is complete as of this date. The circled numbers refe notes below the tabl t .t r e, o the # R[ UIREHENTS FOP FEDERAL-AID BRIDGES Plate 14-1 Punched Cards Narrative Category Required (1) Reouired (2) Required (3) Date D ue (5) A Yes Yes B Yes Yes Yes (4) July 1, 1972 r C Yes No July 1, 1972 Non Deficient No Yes No July 1, 1972 Yes 1 No July 1, 1973 Notes: (1) T fill out o comply with this requirement, the counties and cities must SWISS numb r s 7 k ' From these cards a er mputer a co printed Plate 014-1 6)Appendix xOE-1) will he made and t r r µ re urned to the counties and cities for a review, ??yy ..Sti xIF4. ,. .. _ ..J' 5vc.,,. •_..,_ .a ., ,..., ._: rC.... .... ... . 1 ..1!'RL®Ale?.rtt?m.,•- .-____ t f 3' t. " I J .. ? tin ... i t. ti .. h? fflo q}w5??ap?''b t 4 F1 l?! 1 1 ? ? 1 ? f I ?.> t lN`r?. 1 4 E Ir E ? 1K ?Yh qd?G, 1 E?, ? ti ?+? ?,N?n{vC? p' 0 L Rr; _ ?? rE < ac `4 ' F, e ,ry Vt, All County Engineers and All City Engineers Page Three a Iday 9, 1972 , Note (1) Cont'd 7c The counties and cities should check for completeness and accuracy on the computer printout, and then add a brief description of the deficiencies, as on the sample in Appendix E-1 and return the sheet to the District State Aid Engineer. (2) To comply with this requirement, the counties and cities need only fill out the five cards already required in note (1). ;- p' Using the SVIIBS System, the state will complete this renuirement. (3) The counties and cities must t•irite the required narrative. It x is to be returned to the state with the completed Plate 14-1 ,,..,. printout described in note (1) above. .. (4) This narrative is to be less than one page in length, giving R, SS justification for replacement of the bridge, a description of a the proposed reconstruction of a comparable facility and a it schedule which indicates, in months, the estimated time interval tilization of the funds d th t l c'^` e u an acemen between approval for rep a for the various phases of replacement. (A sample narrative is attached to be added to the SWIGS Manual as Appendix E-2.) e (5) Please note that the July 1, 1972. due date is according to the lad " , .I federal requirements, and that the state still wishes to have the SWIBS Coding Forms by June 1, 1972, but no later than June 15, 1972, < in order to be able to meet the federal deadline. In an effort to aid you in filling out necessary forms, a meeting has been set up in your district. Your district State Aid Engineer and a member of the State It s y Highway Bridge Division will be there to answer any questions you might have. d tt q en . is hoped that either yourself or a member of your staff will be able to a i ? aa. The meetings are set up as follows: Tuesday, May 16, 10:00 a.m. r Wenatchee -- he an County PUD Aduditorium, 327 FL Wenatchee Ave., South End of Bldg. b3` OlwmPia Highway Administration Bldg. oaB rd Room No. 1D9 ? , < Wednesday. May 17, 10:00 a.m. okane -- G < / y -i F . I SSp 11. 2714 Vafair Street Office District Highway encc Room Fe ? u. , , . , r on Vancouver ? ?I ? Room, District Highway Office, 4200 Fain Street -re ?, _ ;" ' All County Engineers and All City Engineers Page Four 1972 Ma 9 t y , a Thursday, May 18,.10:00 a.m. Yakima -- aci is Power and Light Company Auditorium, 7 N. 3rd Street, 3rd Floor Seattle -- l? ? ?" ` * yy oya ork Restaurant-Mercer Island R ? &' ", ', cc: Goff Foster Giessler Biesen L. M. Robertson M In response to your invitation and as discussed with you on February 13, 1970, we herewith propose to perform the Jefferson County Bridge Rating Survey as outlined herein. 1. We will, as and when directed by County Engineer, review Jefferson County Bridges, collect bridge inventory data as required for bridge records and perform bridge rating analyses for each bridge. 2. In addition thereto we will, as requested, review bridge conditions in the field, locate, define and describe any found defects. 3. From this collected data we will perform bridge service capacity analyses and will develop bridge rating infor- mation. Following completion of all field survey and office ana- lysis work, we will return all collected material, in a format pre- scribed by the County Engineer, to you for use in bridge management work. 4. All herein described work will be performed by, or under direct management of, Professional Engineers, specialists in bridge engineering, and will comply with all current requirements of AASHO, U.S. Bureau of Public Roads as well as all other pertinent regulatory agencies. Con t' d { f P e?Y N :n 31 'NM1 „y'Y f?t44"YN ? h p ???? ? ,. ` r 1 1 W3'k y ' . .cI I ARVID GRANT AND ASSOCIATES 5. Our professional services charges for all herein described and performed work will be calculated from our projecta time records as 2.15 times each employee's hourly salary cost, *pe as per ASCE Manual 45, Section V, page 20, paragraph 3 (copy enclosed). The thus calculated fees will include provisions for all costs related to transportation, equipment, communication and subsistence - meals and lodging, while performing the field phase of the work. Please signify your acceptance of this letter by sign- ing the enclosed copy and returning it for our files. Very truly yours, ARVID GRANT AND ASSOCIATES Arvid Grant, P.E. AG:rp Enclosures ACCE TEp: Uct-1 L1/. /., ! FE SON COUNTY ENGINEER PORT TOWNSUID, 93368 4;aevs { yuxi DEAR GARY: ATTACHED HEREWITH ARE EIGHT (8) SWIBS FORMS WITH THE REVISIONS SHOWN ON THE INDIV a IDUAL FORMS. THESE EIGHT (8) BRIDGES ARE: 17E YARR (WIDENED AS PART OF A SHOULDER WIDENING CONTRACT) 19E RAILROAD OVERCROSSING 21E OLD LITTLE QUILCENE (16E LITTLE QUILCENE REPLACES THE OLD BRIDGE FOR VEHICLE T " RAFFIC) 4W HELL ROARING (THIS NEW BRIDGE COMPLETED IN 1981-REPLACES OLD WOODEN STRUCTURE) 8W QUEETS (MINOR CHANGE TO REFLECT CHANGE IN YEAR OF REPLACEMENT) 11W OWL 27W WILLOUGHBY 29W HOH RIVER (ABANDONED IN FAVOR OF ACCESS TO AREA VIA DNR ROADS) t THESE CHANGES SHOULD BRING JEFFERSON COUNTY BRIDGE DATA UP TO DATE a x?M v . S1N?C RELY q , M.L. SANSTROM, P.E. ? ? DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS - „1 CC: BRIDGE FILE sez ^ ?` rC't JOHN SPELLMAN s y;'?z Governor -? s Ktt? . ra ? r X i. a RECEIVED JUN 181982 JEFFERSON COUNTY ENGINEERS OFFICE n • ;tr? 83 r? T 1 1 f y s ' i t ?! ? t f ?? ?r F 1 t 1 r 5 5 r 1`:1 ?' y (iJ 1 It T! 3 ' ;:1 V ! t? V p ?, ?/II V { 1n 4 Il-?: S• .?Iw STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Highway Administration Building • Olympia, Washington 98504 June 14, 1982 Local Agency Engineers in Urban Cities and All Counties DUANE RERENTSON Secretary ' r` f ----- --- Av;'i C0 OFFICF Et! I JEiiR COf",PAISSICNF.RS ROAD SUPT FILE u?A???r Re: Senate Transportation Committee (STC) Bridge Needs Study Gentlemen; Senate Floor Resolution No. 1982-201 provides for an assessment of the costs of upgrading structurally deficient and functionally obsolete bridges, the future costs of maintenance on bridges, and the need for additional bridges. We provided a cost estimate for replacing structurally deficient and functionally obsolete city and county bridges to the STC at a public hearing on may 26, 1982. This information was available from the statewide bridge inventory. The bridge Inventory does not, however, contain information concerning extraordinary maintenance costs, nor concerning the need for a new bridge where none exists now. We request that you help us make your needs known by filling out and returning as many of the attached information sheets as apply to your agency. Please copy the blank sheets as many times as necessary to identify your needs individually. The information sheets are: Sheet H - High Cost Replacements; Sheet M - Maintenance Costs; Sheet N -New Bridge on New Alignment; and Sheet P - Parallel Bridge. To be prepared for the next STC hearing, we must have this Information no later than July 1, 1982. Should you have any questions regarding these information sheets, please contact Stan Moon at our Olympia office (206) 753-1019, SCAN 234-1019. f v ' Sincerely eti i KEITH EGGEN S tate Aid Engineer KE:F3/117 ' GD Attachments cc: Ernie Geissler, County Road Administration Board w/attach Stan Finklestein, Association of Washington Cities w/attach Gene Baxstrom, Senate Transp. Committee w/attach tx , t 1 PPyy? '. rt ?rrf + ?' ? f .? alt T '+.?.'+µ.S.Y ".r Y1?:'U ..,WANp., D.? J+K11}L?1 two. JlrW'AKSIJI ? 5 J?vj 'v i4??P )'1 ? - y ld ::?a 4 ,.may ?,M1I? 1 . „ i?A W r ? ! F ? ? ?*? i + ' J t t l'14 1 ! ? ??' 1 } 5 A ? (1 Yf (,I?' r r ? '• FEDERAL BRIDGE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM ' July 1982 ( yS-: s Sheet "H" - High Cost ($10,000,000 or more) Replacements ° The Federal Highway Bridge Replacement and Rehabilitation Program includes a " discretionary fund" which is administered in Washington, D.C. This discretionary fund is available, under certain conditions, for the replacement of existing structurally deficient or functionally obsolete bridges which have a replacement ?q? cost in excess of $10 million. The local match requirement is 20 percent. The following bridge(s) would be replaced in the time frame indicated if 80 percent federal matching money were available: Time Frame (Check One) ` a Bridge Name Bridge No. Total Bridge Costs 0-6 Yrs. 6-12 Yrs. r t a F3/117 BRIDGE NEEDS INFORMATION SHEET for the SENATE TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE v `+ July 1982 r ' h " " F S eet M - Maintenance Costs (Extraordinary) y Definitions: Routine Maintenance - Work which must be periodically performed on all bridges of a given type to extend their life. Painting a well cared for steel bridge every 10 years and replacing a timber plank deck every 12 years are 4 examples of "routine maintenance" and should not be listed here. .a WI i "s Extraordinary Maintenance - Work which is not typical of all structures of a given type and which must be accomplished on a one-time basis before "routine a r f- k , maintenance" can be expected to extend the life of a bridge. Extensive sandblastin and re air needed to return a steel b id e to a ell cared f tat p g r g w or s e, and rehabilitation of a salt-deteriorated concrete bridge deck are examples of "extraordinary maintenance" and should be listed here. - Amount Bridge Name Description of Extraordinary Estimated Currently Unfunded and Number Maintenance Needed Cost Budgeted Amount .}pq? Y ? ? ?''R ] S S S ? ?i u ? ?. 4 F { L? I :. J k t.n r ? 1, c rf y Page Totals $ $ $ a y ????5 4?s,a F3/117 { ;. re.?=. t: .?'4.4. _?.. •-_,_.. nF u??;_ ?_. ,. e+Wr ?:?Sinnk .Gt"uRL'd ? '? ? ? SA t ry BRIDGE NEEDS INFORMATION SHEET for the )} SENATE TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE July 1982 Sheet "N" - New Bridge on New Alignment This sheet is to be used to describe the need for a new crossing over a river, :- canyon, railroad, freeway, etc., where no bridge exists now. Use one sheet for each bridge. Please attach a vicinity map of sufficient detail to show the proposed bridge location. yy" The following new bridge would be constructed on an alignment where no bridge now exists if _percent state or federal funding were available: Street or road name: ?5 e Feature to be crossed: $ Proposed length of structure: feet. s Proposed roadway width on structure: feet. w? Length of new street or road required to connect to existing system: feet Estmated Average Daily Traffic (ADT) t ? - after completion: on bridge; under bridge. - Estimated right of way cost: $ Estimated design and construction cost for new roadway: $ s Estimated design and construction cost for new bridge: $ ; Total: $ Brief description of need for new bridge: Would your agency pursue this project if assistance were available for bridge design, bridge construction and bridge right of way only? K r Time frame when local match money would be available: 0-6 years; 6-12 years; _ beyond 12 years F3/117 x t n. r a I V 'N 'rr BRIDGE NEEDS INFORMATION SHEET for the SENATE TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE July 1982 Sheet "P" - Parallel Bridge (or widening of existing bridge) 6n This sheet is to be used to identify a bridge needing widening or needing a parallel Y bridge in order to adequately and safely serve existing traffic. Use one sheet per ' bridge. Please attach a vicinity map of sufficient detail to show the proposed bridge location. r' T The bridge is structurally adequate for at least uate to serve existing traffic not ade d i id f * q e an s eet w 25 years, but is only counts. It would be widened, or left in place for one way traffic with a parallel structure being constructed if _percent state or federal funding were t' available. Street or road name: Feature to be crossed: t Proposed length of structure: feet. ± Proposed roadway width on structure: feet. t Brief description of road or street improvements needed to accommodate a widened or parallel structure: Additional width of right of way needed: _ feet. Average Daily Traffic (ATD): existing; __after improvement Estimated right of way cost: $ Estimated design and construction cost for roadway improvements: $ Estimated design and construction cost for bridge: $ Total: $ Brief description of situation requiring the construction of a parallel (or widened) bridge at this location: Would your agency pursue this project if assistance were available for bridge design, bridge construction and bridge right of way only? Time frame when local match money would be available: 0-6 years; 6-12 years; beyond 12 years F3/117 T!7-777 , 4 f i 1 f ''LL i sG IOHN SPELLMAN H» Governor t t - STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATK Highway Administration Building • Olympia, Washington 98504 August 6, 1982 d w City and County Engineers Bridge Inspectior Summer Distribute t Gentlemen: C UNTY EW! 4LER ASST CO. ENCINEER CONSi f:NGINFER 753-6005- ------ FACE ENC!rI[FR COW4!SSIONERS ROAD SUPT n FILE Enclosed are computer printed.SWIBS bridge inspection forms for those bridges within your jurisdiction scheduled.to be inspected within the next twelve months. Inspections at not more than two year intervals are required by both federal and state regulations, and must be performed by a licensed engineer or by an inspector who has completed a comprehensive train- ing course and has five years of experience in bridge inspection. Should you have any questions regarding the use of these forms, or the bridge inventory please contact Ed Thome of our headquarters Bridge Division, (206) 753-1356, SCAN 234-1356. Questions regarding the bridge replacement program should be directed to Stanley Moon of our head- q+ r}-. quarters office, (206) 753-1019, SCAN 234-1019. Your continuing cooperation in inventorying and inspecting your bridges has become a nationwide example. Thank you. Sincerely, K ITH EGGEN State Aid Eng n r KE:cz Enclosure r reP ?T rA r ?, I I ?? {(% zqh ? t ? J tr ,?? I r t ; ' ? v sj DUANE OERON e[ar i July 12, 1983 A-X?0- JOHN SPELLMAN d& DUANE fERENTSON Governor Sceay STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Transportation Building • Olympia, Washington 9850.1 • (106) 753-6005 City Engineers/ County Engineers Public Works Inventory Survey Section IV Bridges Our File: B-60.1 Recently you were requested to provide the Planning and Community Affairs Agency with your critical public works needs for the next five years. To assist you with the section on bridges, I have prepared two reports from the SWIBS system. The first report is a tabulation showing total bridges, structurally deficient bridges and structurally obsolete bridges. "Structurally Deficient" and "Functionally Obsolete" are terms defined by the Federal Highway Administration. Basically structurally deficient bridges have low condition codes and functionally obsolete bridges have low appraisal codes. The second report is a listing of all your bridges. If a bridge is structurally deficient or functionally obsolete, a "SD" or "FO" respectively will be printed to the right of the field with the heading "SUFF RTNG". In previous inquiries from the Legislature, we have reported tabulations of structurally deficient and functionally obsolete bridges as being the bridge needs within the state. If you have any questions, please contact me at 206-753-2888 (SCAN 234- 2888). Sincerely, DAVID W. ANDERSON, P. E. State Aid Bridge Engineer DWA:ceJ/15 REFCA F1 VE® Enclosures JUL 151983 cc: District State Aid Engineers ENGER?ON COUNTY VEERS OFFICE „-Iu, 11-iJ 1 4V 1 m10 1 12m l 1 i:i0 I 1 I 1 { I 1 J 1 I 1 N ? I O } S r"I'RO'N ? I 1 ?? I r ? I I ? ? ?, i 5 ? i ? I J I ? ? I I I I ;.i t I l + ; ? ? + d y " 1 1 Zc ? ' t y 14 u ? 1 r "? ?: f7C .71N { ` ? "l [ ? 1 ? 1 i I 7 I h ti'S `?yw ,1 f-Q6x i ,? ' I ( Z 1 1 I ? I i I 1 I I 1 I ?? ? rll t. r `r?fi ?`F1 ti G 1 4 1 Wn ; I ?V " ? q x I ? ?a? 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o e o a c W 4 a t, t lul u i r l 1 1 I I I I I I 1 1 I I 1 I I 1 1 I I I I 1 WN I 1 ? I ?a 1 I j F.7 I I 1 VH I j 1 ?U a I I I 1 1 f_cC 1 1 I i I ? ' I I I ? ZW I 1 ? 0 I ; 1 ' I I n LLN I 1 ? I WWN 00 1 I I I 1 ? i I=--T T I t ? 1 I I UJJ ?JJ I I 1 I I 1 I 1 aa2 1-aZ 1 t 1 1 ? ? i ? t/1?0 1 i 1 I a?u I i l i i I 1 17E-.7 I 1 I I ? i 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ® ® 0 1 Ir I; I I sa?I mlr?hhlordmh,ohhh?ohr?hr?mdPrrhmm? i l Uzj m.tmhm?mmmcommmNm?mhmmm?mmm? C-4 j CD"=Wm mMmmaommm?qmS.0o mmdmmmdco on P 7Z0 1 PO PPPOiP mPO PPP PPPCrP PhO PPPO WOOWUy I mf?f?-mmo7 hmmtimmmmhNm Nhm OlRS mdYj - coo I C 1 Ohw I I mNh mm mMmmf`?mmm mlf-Mm'ih m.0 a0rhhl`? -j 1 j I iI ?O.C I hdmhhmmwwr jmmm Nihhmrml-mmmmmc0 '', j _ OUOJ> I ' m0)m mP W?mmO?mmmO7mPmO?m ?`P mm mmm ', ^rk]?] 1 f I :?, r-ux4zi mnmmmmmmmmmmmmlmmmvhmPt?mmm1= I ? I •? c '?7m: o H7ai mmmmm?mmmmmmm?mdmommm?mmm? u 1 1.0 WUY; mr r-mmlpmmmf mmm coh.tm Smoot tgWmmw " 1' ! 1 0 o j o o i 4. c N N N j I \ \ 1 )Y. U' 1 NO PPOh?MhnI1 SP?ONm,YOSMPQ;OUI,OS I I j!S I WZ 1 SO mOS Shhhy00NR1MhOSOSYmhN 1 I '7F- I OSPIn.-I Oln m.-ISNNIn.-Im OP O?I?OU?mhu1 I 2` ? I NCI PO hmm0?N V1 ml-ImmmmhMmNP mhO!hmdd ' I •a •:?y ILLCWdi N.-fNNN NNNNNNN N N N N N N N NnIN NNNnI pp'' Ys. 1 ?-wa 1 MMMM MR1MMf?1 K1mM M?1mmM MMK1M R1mMmm . I OILnI mmmmmLgmmmmmmmmmmmwmmmmmmmm I , QQZ1 OQOCC S 0S0SaJ000dSS00rloloonnN. .I.1on01..10I 1 I f 1 JO'-' i OR q Cj004 i j '_ I yx 1 OOOod00001f?00O d0001L?O?OSROP 00 II , 1 UF-U I mf?Sm OdMmm mmmO Sm dOId ONd dNON .y I WM 1 I N?INNNN?INNIyNN NNN.-IN?IryNNN NS MN .'.1 _ I 03u 1 OO 0000000000000000100000000 - ??, 1 il-x 1 m?ohrM'-+aoroM'-1'-I'?hN.+P..o.ohSY,mo I U?- I hNdm N?I?N?01`imhml?S'-'m?dm Pnl`D1 Mto a 1 7 I d "? N d ?. I CZL7 I ? I ( i - -i 1-w 1 I I 1 j 1 I I i 1 Ou6 1 44CCC Qa 4CQC4444a.000 44 QQ a4Q j A I OJ I SYIY1Inll1`Od SJ' SS.p glnd d00000009 1 !LLU 1 I 0000000 000,000000000000 00,00 I , 1 411 0 1 ! 1 11 1 1 1 I? 1 1 1 1', 1 1 1 1! 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I' 1 1 1 Ij ( i 1 3W 2 1 I li 1 1 1 Ij 1 1 1 1' 1 1 1 1! 1 1 1 1, 1 1 1 111 I I I; ? N? ?12F+ 71 j 1 I,I 11 l,I I 1 1.1 1 11,'rl I 1 1,1 1 11,,1 I 1 I' it ? -.,? 4 G"" ? i ?aN. i I NaaaaaaNNNNNa?aaaaaaaa.NNNa I t- I 12? 21 4LLLLLLLLLLLLaQ QaaLLLL'LLLLLLLL LL 'a QaLL I I '. F `1 1 OI LL??.?_.Z:.'.ZLLLL LLLL LLZ?2?ZZ _?2LL.LLLLZ 'wCi ? 22't Y2222332222wwwWWwwwwwwul ! f'?-'rt]MMNNN dtI?N Of?00?.SnIMNd41 p1(?.p l? Sly ? 1 '•l7W 1 'H? NOO?O,NNNnlN N.+-I ?I.+.-1.-1 ? I , P '1? I ? 1 'm21 I I I , C 1 I M j I I edl .e.,.f;i I Z 1 s w N B w u O t7 J C W iz N'W ,? OC7 C W J I I 1 I =1 o Jwa w 'u -r 1 d 1 Z. ly OZwNI > IJ Z ! I ? Z I I >; :om 1 1 m m OwOJC ;? U, 1 LLI 1 C Z Q r Jttu' JF-.U O C/ 7' I 7 / I U W O I O JmZ HZ 4 7LU I '. a i i 1 ( OI L-1 xN mN=0 tr o cc N'? Cr+ONO W uo WtAWJJ .J ZSYJwJ CCViJ 44 ? I - '1• l HWN JWJy Wit aly 1.7 HWJI-/?C SF- I ' ' S ,?I. 1 m 1 WLLIKOCf1JJ JO JU =37'u0 T_ON> 71-C?+K: I I J772Q?l7CW JrpOOWOJ.-IJWW t7.+42D I I hll ' I 1 WOx4mZIQx42oCF-O Ytl{OJg2 X'C?,J>IJ6? -? ? m'^ SA? Z rL1--r-rl-Fr/-tirF-1-1-h- '' I Y{ry i, 1 H/- Z ZX 2-* 2! 2.' Z y?;y ZZZZZZ7Z7_ZZ7r' ZZ2z, i ( I y h 0 77777=000.7077'77077777 I 0000000 00000 000000000000 n-Y 1 - I uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu _ y I ZT7.2z2:2ZZ?Z7.7 7 >I I u0000t?0OC100COU000000._ OUCJOUO ?$ 0 00.00 ?:• I U1 NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN N NN N N N I i?t '?? I* ? 1 ,,' 21 1 CKCCKO;CCCfY.CCCC'CCCCO'7.CCCKCy'. i 'I ? J 1 tl ?1 1 LD U.LIWWILIWWWWWWWILILLIW LLIWWW WYlWWWWLLi u' I I LLWLLLLLL WLL LLLL LLV LLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL LLLLLLLL I tl '. Y z' IY { ? ? ? I C I I LLLLLL LLIL Y.LL LLLL LL\.LLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL LLLLLLwLL LLLL' I { 1 1 I LLIWW WW WWWWWWWWIIIW WIUWW WLLIY:UIWWW 1 ''i 1 -'i ? i 1 1 -ro-1nn -1->'n-»"-e-e {l /'? ' I 1 1 ? 1 O ociooocinooooo00ooooonoooooo OO O O • I MI m I 1 JI W 1 OG O OOOp000000000000000 POd SOmP df+NPONC?.-tlmN.f^.+N.OV?Pm PI+? - I '-Idd SN1?N.+01({S YI'tIMO NS Oti.+M.IM t-h lf? ? ?P 1 ?'' LL ? MONSOOn10N M.dh ONM OOOOOu'100md?1 f '+ 1 O. 1 ' 0000.1000000000000000000000 0000000000 p000000000000p00 '. x L - ?? „?. (?S. ^17 J I ? O V10000000000000000000000000 D . ' XL .. +`' 1 '^IG 1 C l 1111(?MM.-1??NNNN Nm mON1/?NN mNtf?U11(?f+h hh.f.tIJ?V000000.pdOO SI` f ?S N + i 1 , ' ! Y 1- 1 S • ? .+-1 r UOOMMI+IMS S.ISSJ.YLnPPNd MOM MSIf?IA '. . i??. I . . tJ Z 71 I r U 1.IN NM ? N n ?I.+•+ N M1ddO'P PP. ltld ddOd ddd 00000 d N .?Iti- ?Inlr?In1 - I ?.. I .. ... ? i ; i r 5'K .?'nn _ ?, m J . ?L i?I A r I 1 * W ? r i n br y?{s JOHN SPELLMAN < Governor STATE OP WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATIO Highway Administration Building • Olympia, Washington 9850.1 July 14, 198 City Engineers County Road Engineers Bridge Invent Listings; Gentlemen: Enclosed are the updated State of Washington Inventory of Bridges and Structures (Sl•IIBS) bridge inventory 9 forms resulting from' your most recent submittal of information. Please check to verify that your updates were accomplished correctly, and place these forms in your bridge files for future use. d Should you have any questions regarding any edit messages which may be printed on your forms, or regarding any other aspect of the bridge inventory, please contact Gary Demich at our headquarters office in Olympia, r s'} (206) 753-2888; SCAN 234-2888. Your continuing cooperation in inventorying and inspecting your bridges is most appreciated. .Sincerely, KK I 11 A?Jt G '/G?E r State Aid ineer C tv f-® KE : d s G GO Enclosures ?uL281gg1• JENG NE R ?F NCE -C. . x_• MIA •? -?? '?''r?', j ? y r , ` ' '? 4 ` ? i ?? ? ? ,_ 'ftic? 1. ? 4, 4 I I t f Tr t 1 '?IY ti ti ? t 1 a Iv Lri i:11.eR ASS'T CO. CN011ILER col, T i IE' R _- - -1:U )mod c? TSON ry I. yd Fie4 August 24, 1979 M' + 7, City Engineers rv a > + County Road Engineers Cities and Counties for the r State of Washington Bridge Inventory Listings s.. On and Off Federal-Aid System c Gentlemen: ? We have modified the computer output on the SWIBS forms, and n i l request that you review this letter and its attachment so that you ma become fa ili i ' y4 4 y m ar w th the modifications. They have e} t been made in an effort to assist you in reviewing your data, th t e . so, a your chanc s of qualifying for Bridge Replacement fund- i ill b i " " #, - ng w e mproved. A Record Deleted message and a new s' series of edit messages have been added to the white form ri t t d # p ou n s, an each package of forms mailed to you will include a (green and white computer pa er) summa f t l . p ry o he updates made and the records updated. The modifications are: 1. "Record Deleted." Until now a type "2" update did r nothing but eliminate a given record from the file. - There was no output to show that the deletion had t been successfully completed, or what the data looked lik t h e a t e time of deletion. From now on, a standard SWIBS form will show data current at the time of dele- tion and will have the message "This record has been deleted" printed next'to the control fields. (Example , Attachment No. 1.) You may then keep the form in an obsolete status, or destroy it, at your discretion. ) ?uE 2. Update Summary - With each mailing of updated SWIBS forms we will now include a summary listing of the up- date activity which took place. This listing can be useful to you when checking for possible keypunch errors, and is the only output available which contains both the old and new addresses for a record which had its control fields changed. (Example, Attachment No. 2.) 3. Validity Edit - This is the same as you've seen previ- ously. Whenever a code is not acceptable to the compu- ter, the invalid data is underscored and a row of aster- isks prints under the card number at the left edge of the form. The asterisks are printed to aid you in iden- tifying which cards contain invalid data. All under- scored data is incorrect and must be updated. Example, Attac ment No. 3.)- _ t a? y??T 1. ??f? t c r _ ll 4 U ??? ?M.a? ' yTl"M""'"'°1J' ?rlha.`r4'dBl f81W ?,? i a}n V h 4 r r f i;1? I y t ' Y ? TwY?/ ,y I ? ??? ° I 11£ _ sPf x u .. ..r 9v. R. [.:? w }T August 24, 1979 Page 2 4. Logical Edit - This is new. Whenever an update is i^ made, each record is run through a logical edit composed of.more than 65 separate checks, each ofs which compare the values in two to four fields. Fields which may be in error are listed at the top of the form next to the control fields, with a mes- sage which reads "Please verify the coding in the fol- lowing fields:". (Example, Attachment No. 4.) This verification is for you to do, and does not require a letter telling us that the data is correct. Please check the indicated fields closely against the SWIBS Coding Manual, and submit any necessary updates in >, y the usual manner. Please keep in mind that underscored data is incorrect, and must be updated. Fields listed at the toe of the orb m appear to be incorrect when compared with another listed field, and may or may not require updating. Please do not notify us if listed fields are OK, just be certain to sendin the appropriate updates if they are not. ?y Should you have any questions regarding the new edit program or '.[ other aspects of the SWIBS inventory, please call Gary Demich at the State Aid headquarters office, (20.6) 753-2888, SCAN.234-2888. Your continuing cooperation regarding the bridge inventory has t made Washington State's inventory-inspection-replacement program one of the best in the nation: Thank you. Si7e l KEITH EDGEN State Aid Engineer KE:cz GD Attachments li;t ?a yr ^. s m C). 7 i O I ° I p ( v ' • F r -1 ,..1 1T ! I ?? 2 y ? ' ? 1 I 1 -I V°? O S - O I - 1 ? { O '. ? + _ Fi z , (? r is .? ` I ou i p O 2 O,. I I I i L O i a iP51 ' t i- - -! O o ?[Tpf- ?. ?I_'_ _ 1 __ _ O p I q '6 t U Qc- ° ._ ' _ O ' a _% O.zU> -_ • I I i °? $ tv>.vf a _ r I O. - - t ! ' toatwoo: r I l Oi ?> I p p ? o m oi jo j 7 I oEO ' o.3t I 'ZWj f a o 08 - uYTi ~ p z0i ?j ? fzfz o ` IPI pj 1 T ? O *'A177 N L -I II I I 2? I r ?I ? e' it Z I ? E a Q ` ? z z ( i c D 1?-,-oD ° ° 1 ?. J O O. TI mo l 00 U T. U2 I I ' O: ? t` j OI I 7 ?mI O-. 'F = t O - ` $; j I ( I { i ' . pG p f I { ?j O'O j t I jNlzg I J 100 O. _i 1 a i O t/f i p,w ? IO I Oi t h 0: I 6W O Z CJ C7 y z m - ° rZ N ?.o'o 0 15 I 0 so -io ' y ' - i N -' a rid ° u Z 0 l O -, p N 030 1 i p; z O,_,• i M. = n 0.<03 I. Z o; _-- n i dl• ;.Ulu v ° 4 Q 3 zu z o O N,O - O, R - O I :N.h t IT- z UU^i 1 10?.? i O E ;. Z r' 1 :O io ?C•:z omo LU '0 O w ! O. cn; 0, 1, I f a :. : u I I J i O i t N N; iO.3.. .+ s f-?_ yDax 6 p C, FO - f.':• 1 I 1 I m.M non ° ?F,.izl ?' 0 1 W dr - _. I I zV t '° '°? im.°< arol O. ?U50 I _ N O ?O 'Q,,C iD c n - O _ a t - . O YW O N ! CO S 3 °0 , U L ,mil w' U a i 1 O' IO l onxsR I ? 7? O .n_ i sn rox - • ' ' ' ' ?o ?' ; uW - o gy -- T z ? ? - ? o rl ` o o I M p. O O w U .r a iN e m` O ??'i _ IN. n? IsAI a It O? ( .6k I 10' r+ 1 . 1 1I?2 J W'. tl sZ r NI 11rw?Yy i `_i P1 O t'# ' n 0! .. N.. .__ 1 Z; I ?I 1 -1NIy a? IU p ? 7: m, Im:O _+ { ? NvHJ R ? m ' I -?O. 'y3 ` ? 3 O ' .4'1. ' ': I?1 1 ? Ib p ?? ? - ' ° - - a i ,? r q3a of I .ov nM. l 1 ? u C "', ? H ??' b7xM0 R ?I ?I O n I.-sl Ds ? n ~ O, 1 { i? ti '?- $ :? ? " • -_ Oy ' l? 1m R: NS. DOlSl10 R 1o? _ _ j0`? p I _ jO. iy c"SE ?,. *{Vy M? ?'.N. O 0 , O Y O 7701 !..1 IM n I J 1 3z1 I n O O ? a I I .a?? n ?ti I n{ .0, R ° tl 4•. r? I '?l ,F c ,? ? M ? I Ip U . N70M77• I _{ j u ? O' bllOl)D ? O l O? ? _ 'O I „? j ??? Ip. •C"? t? M ' .i; ?? 4. ,f; y' 61 HJf10MN1 S SNWf110:) 31tlJlldfld _ H7N(1dA3>i (w ?jy h cn. l 10 • ; I v ?. o' °o1 ICI ?.t?` Im.i m_I ? co? b i 4 Il? .e? Y ? u W 4 i I I ' I xl f J i i tP M1 I? o I ?r^ I U I L? i I ? ti `m 00 ' M1Q I M1M1 ? ! M1.o I i M1L'l j j r` 3• I M1m I rN , M1.+ j I .uo j W I ?~o I o I ,o rn 'n a ~ r ?P O trim ? w tnM1 i a I ,n,n c I tin m O I L'?N I aI?P? .. I rm rM1 v? N Stn m i .r r S m +? r N to S ••+ 1 i I rO' mP mm i mM1 I m•o m to I mr I mN I m.. I via NP N m N l n Nt Nm i • NN i NO 1 ?+ P I M1 i ...tn N ? o 1 om j 1I O h { O.O I O u? Or om ON O? 0 V O O 1 - co h M1 m m P M1 IS, 0 0 r M1 O 0 m h cl% M1 N Ln m r .ro c6 I r m co m co co co m m .o I m M1 I r W is ?o rd o O m W?• Wti COD hit rm• P O O .K O h LU W ¢In i to Nm ?? M1 m m h m M1 M1 P h •m :O O ,W a a O !4 0 ..r 2-+ wa iW O (Co to an rqM M1 P 10 O to IWrV W rt In W P 2 I ~ Ir am I d 2 I 2 r m 0 m m h P M1 m O O W h.1 a V O 2 ao 20 w0 W O Coo ar xCo P O O K lot- ,UN IW a.tn to Co _ h r- M1 m m M1 m r I N I.m O O W H ti a IO o I4 0 0 jz0 wo O 1=0 1 Itn o Ia •o 0 P 10 O Im QA :`U N IS I~ i 0 00 c n ::m no. n tn.+o O.+O I ?O O ocoo m i Como I .rm0 I vm o an a woo N No I omo I M1 In a C? co ^-, m0 I m Nm0 m Omo m omo I o ONO OPO I P M1M1O r 000 coo r a.r Comm coo N ? O itU f ti a :W o U O w O w O jm o M M1 x m P O O !K ,L,1oh N W I? UN `1m h 12 io 00 ?O ,n ti0 to o-+o m O-lo M1o -o rmo omo hmO .omo mmo mo otno o00 mrlo omo -m0 ow o -m o owo omo ON o .o00 u I" o o-o alo r1.?.-dN ooc4o 0000 0000 mmmo .o, •o •o O VOO 0000 rrrr M1M1rrM1 mmmm PPOtP O 000 I mrtn•o rhr it H I K a aI Z W f w p 1 Q S O K i O U LLl K = I I I O Nmrtn.o n to tntn tntn 'NmtUmm M1hhAh o 74 r o .I i 1 0 `u _ i O°zz •t I I I I I_ __ __. ' ' "5 i s- I ? ?? z i i OsWo I I I I O , - RM. ?P O s 00 _ _ oS .' IJ Z _ I ° I _ I d _I °z m i°o o - V ?' U Os ozo? ' I °,z I I _I O o { ° u 'r z o: o' o:!z I o'z"of c?z :2 nl j I I o NS 1 ° i _ m C w o o i o I i to I I ° azo l i O N O _ ! . C I r? , OI 16 a. m (? '-/ rI O? t z ? I i ?. N.o 'oo J' In - Z? Z ? v1 E I N 1 > D ' dv q { aY I f , t r , o ? s' o - - - --- - i -- Z ou r o - r w "' o nr o' ' O N I O ? ' ? .? O O 3 w -Mz J °oo I d ?. a Sw3 ll1e031 J j 2<s•V S j I I f 3 P 3> I S - ?. .-.URN A a. . _ ° Os s nl 1 o -1 F co - O' I _-? O p 1 17 ry y3P.'; C z ' .O >e = 03.-- j 13+ t. Oio3z J1 e t e C o t W : N Z V ° •I I ,O?'? goM 3 1 ° .'z?3° i 7 cr, c) h,Y Y W Y 1 O W3.. JI .A cr W W ?o r <'>n ss O Op`: ° O za I , SIWgI " ?? nr non o ?? I of>`<: I- o - n / w cY o ?t. ' I i? t ?' ?N.?o i ? N; W i t tl,? r = o Y2 ?1 ?nr L > p 4 .r LL O N v? y h•1 -f ',? `.?: ^ m-'__ :o;? - .nz us.M; ' r° .. ;'G? ?r.?LL?1Nw1 ?t !?r r , ? ? E Y N ttr'LQ •' i O.G 1 .._ :,3MK ; ^? _ °av ° ?X r' 4 YF+'d.? ?'j??,1 ,? 5 s I, Oo z m Ya ._-I I ^ m wlN?o NN; In?L?a?sl ?'..' ?3 Eat n oolsru? •`•?.?-1 8 M o f fi os _ 3 a 1 ° co a% - t .. -._ .. E ( _ C - Yl •_r.?._...___4: _...__.• F _o.Y °I°g3 i F._.10? JI ?`q s,??r' 6l HonONH1 S SNwnioD 31VOI1dno :HDNndA3? 11' h ? ?1 j N; I N.i w Y ul lI'' uu.° coooh ... co1 (ro co; i°D 18w j r ? t ?? I '?`7 R ?7???i„ ?' ? S ?a,k: ? 3 _i .n? '?? ? a? ?,??• r h h, } 1 ? d ?r ? ` I ,• r uuuk? ?9nd9? ' P ' +?11? ? afi:.l,.' ?r', ??)h h ? t ? s ? . ?f I a'? 3 v ?r ,, - ' ah M1???+a ? r ° - r ? ? 47X_ q. ?. ,s c; r?j [7 u i.' 1 ' C" O w ? O' w N ? o? 1 O..?u t O,ZS t?8 Z I Z - p _ 'z , 0 00 • Oj ( m, O 1 Q V •' N' O"- - D` z o?•? o W? 1 p Oc - I O - _.. ..__ '-• __c Y&? oho , °?.? { o, I 'fY? 3 r ? ° fMOr+r O O az ? I ?, 9? d'a OI. o tvs p wi ..-!o . q.. S _'aF LLO fn 1 + ' - 7 P : ..... O r+nanv _ p.F?z; ?..uleo l +, t?zm? Y: - z c,1 r: N O U co O 5 C. Z_O=c u\'a uvl.M w? ' J s m OOH .t•'+ `-? J h OvOi O s 1 Cl I no c, 1 7 oaa z ? w ..?>- w O 0 O13S S O ' R.. m - _ .:.. wt e .c 3 - r- i s O ?? , wx _ , _ z7 - _ 7 ? ? N QJ?1/ t 3 dLL. K S ' .-T §°3' fn u o» I - .. 3o I m ;S s gIl t e C ._ w! - I It ?7 r T O DO ?n f ± ^ O. LL. _ YN J <F ...? n m - 1'1 -v.mm Er ^Nl` 11 I rr t y ? - O n>..uwn -. J w o '. r7 ° L•? - __ ! ? _"'_`°? ??, t t1 f ?. i. ,,a ? ? 1 I P u ?y} t o i • N? w O-? S O ti ) m o?ry': z? '?+ y 1 Rt N _ 5 f t,? C n' z J j• 1 n n « r' zunns? .C j ? t?? f as } ?. ?p .. O = ._ a ? ? . O d j '+ 3.. a )- rig •q?rc 'I LL _ _ M Y7NMA Y _ p __ -µ S ; ? ? ?! ? ,l 1 pX7+? N U1 u O f"1 OOISN. .-..O Y• _-_? --_..N { yM1a 5 ^ O M I`j 05 t In vs{ GGC _ t P 61 HonONHl S SNwnio:) 91VDIldna 'HDNf1dA3N ry Ni R to t s fl 6 o' col co v' a to ti € fb ?' co' i co l !a € co, a ,; '-•-•+wn.«wr •rnr>r-n!.r.?s•'^n-.^'r?+y...?..,:-,.-,r.a?',.rn?.....K.,.-,rns'r. ,. ' •' . , ? ; ? t ! .n ± 11ti M t r s -mrtwewvnw?nm,me•,...,o,,...m::...:,`.?_?...?_.? ?_-.?. --_ _.?-__.--_ - '?^?mfe}^:'1+.:[nrn n ? ?IIi1WM ?t I ti• .,; ? ` ° i t ', r f r7<f, I {H p t? n 1 ? ?. w y t, ?1y?[sj V l I J ? _ 1 _q sty R .NR ra STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Dixy Lee Ray Highway Adminish,imn Budding, Olympia, Washiryton 95504 206/75.36005 .? Gouernar February 19, 1960 City Engineers County Road Engineers 9, 1 Bridge Inventory Listings : Gentlemen: Enclosed are the updated SWIBS bridge inventory forms resultin C from your most recent submittal g of information. Please check to verify that your updates were accomplished correctly, and place these forms in your bridge files for future use. The validity edit and logical edit features of the SWIBS forms printout will assist you in reviewing the completeness of your bridge data, helping to insure proper consideration of your bridges in the Bridge Replacement and Rehabilitation Program. If you are not yet familiar with the edits, please refer to the enclosed copy of our August 24, 1979 letter and attachments, which will help you understand these added features. Your continuing cooperation in inventorying and inspecting your bridges is most appreciated. Sincerely, E I T HE GFE State Aid eer KE:cz Enclosures ? y+ ??t ? A n Ilt^ C w: C ? St Ls s } _. ?,1 ? I?r a y1 : p?t?? A??4!!?? ? t w i r ?. ?? Ir - t r?1?' 7x c?it w ?^ F s. tl >'Fkr?XHjr f d , {Jd F r ?1 ..?N Z.yy... S wOOU • ..1 .•+? u1000 cAOoO 000 0 l @ Ir-.! OP ? FO00 Cl R` J.T `T • p J i 4 0J 0.0 . ON U--1-, Z i W j? S '.i ON ! Hmm? ;fn w ; o.. ...rrr. N W ? 1 A ® 0 •TCI-- 1'?@ifJ?rr a?"' LPN e7A{ 4ptT "S, k yp. `',, r^"Pua.,??u ,? ,ew ?.. w 55R?•Ti ?? ? i ?',5?=?, .M-? ? ?5"i,Mu?}y t qy? ?9. ?t ? ; v ?,`; P ' JOHN SPELLMAN a .,?? - Governor DUANE aER SON >' Jt'JY E!"JEEPrv r STATE OF WASHINGTON "JG -" - '---' - i A, 0 u DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATIO - CO M IT. e hJrJ ea -- Highway Administration Building Olympia, Washington 98504 ? -'-'- s • • (- 3?bdOS f i l.. tR July 2, 1981 CO MMIS;9NIRS ' I POhO SUPT-- s County Engineers City Engineers rmr--- a s 6 Bridge Inspect July Transmitt 1 -60.1 ¢ Gentlemen: Enclosed are the SWIBS bridge inspection forms (DOT 234-003) ' for your use while performing the inspections required by federal regulation. Forms have been provided for all bridges coded with a one-year inspection frequency, and for those bridges on a two-year frequency which need to be inspected Y, n y within the next 12 months. I - q` The use of these particular forms is optional, but either the ' bottom half of this form or the white SWIBS inventory form (DOT 234-007) must be submitted at least once every two years to update your bridge records in Washington, D.C. u. Should you have any questions regarding the use of this form or the bridge inventory and inspection requirements, please con- tact Gary Demich at (206) 753-2888, SCAN 234-2888. n?ge. Thank you for your continuing cooperation. Sincerely, K Il? ?-? State Aid E 'Weer KE:cz Enclosure cc: Ernie Geissler District State Aid Engrs. RECEIVED JUL 22 7 1981. ENGINEERS OFFICE J I .,bra„ , E ms„ I RAMS ... GIRDERS. S1711 SttlY H,;R w _. Z N CURBS _ PAINT _ O - _.. 7 SIDEWALKS ..... .w d I UTILITIES. .. ..... ...... w;^ Z STRINGERS a ? w ----- CAPS Z F ? O INTERMEDIATE BENTS m ^ h ( - ABUTMENTS. REMARKS .... RECOMMENDED REPAIRS r5A0r r•+ DOT r. YR. BLT. 3 l,?' 00 LAST INSP. 0681 PIER PROTECTION 7 .. . Ply cq?tLi BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT 27N r. R. AGENCY JEFFERSON COUNTY 07/22/8 S' 21 12W ' FEATURESINTERSECTED HELL ROARIN. CREEK BRIDGE NO. 4W ,'. FACILITIES CARRIED UPPER HOH ROAD BRIDGE NAME HELL 'ROARING CONTROL FIELD 16 14070 000.16 00 LOCATION 7NF JCT $ RT rTl DATE i ' , ` . STRUCTURE TYPE. INSPECTED BY. STRUCTURE __! 4 ...- ..; ,.. DECK GEOMETRY _.. .. .. __.. _.. _ ___. .. .._ .,_ s a ._.._ UNDERCLEARANCES 9 '. SAFE LOAD CAPACITY. A `M O APPROACH ROADWAY ALIGNMENT -. ? h ... ..___ o 4 .... . .... rnsl ,. •_ _.? WATERWAY. DECK .. _- .. ._. .._ ... ,. SUPERSTRUCTURE . Z SUBSTRUCTURE - 6 -' CHANNEL ANDC HANNEL PROTECTION ... -. _..._ .... _.._ .. ?- T AND RETAINING WALLS CULVER --. ' : . ) APPROACH ROADWAY 1 I 4? TERMINAL -- :, w BRIDGE RAIL. -• TRANSITION _- { 'GUARD RAIL _- ,. r .,.__.? SURFACING. _..-. _ _.. _.., FLOORBEAMS _._ _..,.-. _.... ___ _.__ ....., EXPANSION DAMS LONGITUDINAL BEAMS y5ro ' Z -I BEARING DEVICES TRUSSES _ 4,j o -: DRAINS ARCHES L ... . .. ' .. RAILS GIRDERS , 3v d d q = .. PAIN CURBS T .. Z . { ,?p? i1-• o SIDEWALKS UTILITIES STRINGERS._ ; ? -.. __ .. , •?py?' , r ... CAPS.... x tl r 51 O INTERMEDIATE BENTS s , ao ..... ABUTMENTS PIER PROTECTION ... ,. 1 Lr REMARKS. 4 RECOMMENDED REPAIRS w " 59/ 00 LAST INSP. 0681 NSP FRED 1 LE, 1981 S94'" •'+' YR BLT °T a , . DOT ?.,m• x ` ? f' Rq r ? ? v FJ ? ? ? r ?r L t ?? y Gf?p ff 1777 '. ?y;,m : :? ^AP'ti ? - m3fR +R ? 41 .,,? _ , ..,. _ .... "• . ..,.. ?+ u-m sW ?? STATE OF WA SHINGTON r INVENTORY OF BRIDG ES AND STRUCTURES INSPECTION CODING FORM r ic, ' '.23 5 6 78 ..,9 1011 ,1213. 14'-.15 1617. 18 .. 19' AGENCY: JEFFERSON COUNTY ,• 8 5 7 7 1 1 1,6 1:! 0,7 5 0 0 0 0.6 0 0 0 : BRIDGE No.: BW . COUNTY y ROUTE NO MILEPOST NO BR D UEETS I GE NAME: Q C - 20 21 22.2] 24 :25 .26 27 20 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 -]] 38 39 40 41 424344 45, 46 , 17; 48 49 "5n' q +. MONTH YEAR ADEQUACY APPRAISAL CONDITION IRAiFlC SAfETY LIFE 6 $ _ DATE OF G i THIS £ a i EXPECTANCY Z F ?ai YEAR sin INSPECTION F OPTIONAL - 2- _ r 51 ; 52.: 53.; 54 55 56 s7 58 ; 59,60 61 62 63 64 "65 166 67 68 69 70 :71. 72 , 73',.74 175 76 77_"78 • 79 80'f? { g t ?. < ? s 3' I I 1 o 4' a x a I 0 f o' z ill st - .. v INSTRUCTIONSs y 1. CODE ONLY THOSE ITEMS WHICH HAVE CHANGED; ITEMS WHICH ARE CORRECT ON THE TOP SHEET SHOULD BE LEFT BLANK. Y .s 2. BE CERTAIN TO. CODE THE DATE OF THIS INSPECTION EVEN THOUGH NOTHING ELSE CHANGES. ? +k 3. SEPARATE THESE SHEETS AT THE PERFORATION. KEEP THE TOP SHEET FOR YOU ENGINEER. R PERMANENT FILE AND SEND THE BOTTOM SHEET TO YOUR DISTRICT STATE-AID ?. R -'fi,• STRUCTURAL APPRAISAL WATERWAY ADEQUACY 9 Not ap licable - 9 F 9 Not applicable p i PPP ' fuE 8 New bridge 8 Large well establ shed channel. No hydraulic problems. r? ? 7- Good condition. Becoming alder and slightly worn, 7 Rock channel. Riprapped or natural slope protection. Alignment per- nd'c r to brid Strea ade ate No scour l e a cit utfv . Bridge structurally sound for legal loads. Minor facial repairs needed. qu pe u a g . m c pa y . . y ' - ?' ?- 5 5 Bridge structurally sound for legal loads. Major repairs needed, 6 Rock and grovel channel. Gradual slopes or partially riproppad. Align • 4, Bridge structurally sound for all loads except for overloads. Mojnr re merit adequate Stream has moor drill. No scour in immediate area i - - rs necessar to brinto full cart clt P Y 9 carrying caps y of br dge, 5 Gravel and sand channel Un rotected but not stee slo es Minor oli n• k { ,' j ' 3 Restricted loads (Bridge must be posted). Repairs necessary. . p p p . g i . u _ 2 Restricted loads (Bridge must be posted). New bridge necessary. merit problem. Stream causes large drift accumulat on. Minor scouring F nAQ +, - k' I B idga closed. May be repaired, at 6ridga. i _ 1ISY : i r •? 0 Bridge closed. Must be replaced 4 Sand and mud or grassy channel. Unprotected steeper slopes. Al gnment 5 problem requiring eventual repair. Stream causes large drift and a high t s-+ flow. Major scouring but no undermining. 7 c.,yt DECK GEOMETRY, UNDERCLEARANCES, SAFE LOAD CAPACITY 3 Mud channel. Unprotected steep banks Stream overflows banks. Drift may 1 AND APPROACH ROADWAY ALIGNMENT APPRAISALS damage superstructure. Undermining problems have developed. 9 Not applicable 2 Basically intolerable condition requiring high priority of replacement. 8 C clt on equal to present desirable erltaria I Immediate repo r necessary to put back in service. n '7 Condition better than present minimum criteria 0 Immediate replacement necessary to put back in service. r • i 6 Condition equal to present minimum critaria CONDITION I 5 Condition somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being 9 No, applicable ^ 1 R left in place as is 8 Good condition-no repairs needed v 4 Condition meeting minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is 7 Generally goad cond Ilan-poleml0l oxisn for minor maintenance ' _ 3 Bosically intolerable condition requiring high priority of repair 6 Fort conditi n- ot nbol ax sls for ma or m t nc i J 2 Boticaliy intolerable condition requiring high prior ty of replacement p j o e a n ena e I - 1 Immediate repair necessary to put back In service 5 Generally lair cond ran-poloneal oslsH for minor rehabilitation 4 Mo g nol cond non-pa ambal e.lsls for major ehabll'lollon ) . ?5r I ;`s+?,pys ^- `+ srvice 0 Immediate r.ploromen in t ecessary to put bock In e ' o 3 Poor condeion•repan rehab litalo q d immediately p iR1 .: ?:sr 1 ^l bs 2 Cr real cond;Hon - Ihei need for repair or rehobiltabon it urge m. PoNny should TRAFFIC SAFETY FEATURES be closed um7 the ind cotod repair is complete yh 0 A? s 4mn 7 nus 0 Impacted IeaWw does not meet currently acceptable standards. . tudy should dntermine the fnnsibllity for I Colcal cand:non•foclldy is closnd S + C TT''{A 1 d Aw 1 Inspected feature meals currentfy acceptable standards, meets rnpv r 1 y? r. (, r09a 724.w7 2 DOT 9L 9 r9 0 CYl,cal condibon.focil ty is closed end is beyond ropnir . y KN 7 I n j 7 I ? ? l 1 A'. ?.(-4 y It 5!L to{4 ? t 1 ' 1 1 Ci ! 1 :? 1 r ? ' I l { yWy;45g i} j { L t 1 L t r Ga L 4i::.'lartYJ? ? '4{ l?i ?•e? a731'W ?lF ?.,,, . ? .• lw.w..... > ':Ji??+ :. 'I'.. lu.r '.. 96FGI'>;B. ?+•U3J STATE OF WASHINGTON INVENTORY OF BRIDGES AND STRUCTURES INSPECTION CODING FORM 1 1 0:4..5 6.;:78 9 '10 11 11:.13 141s To 17 le 19 AGENCY: JEFFERSON COUNTY 7,8 g X 1 6 1: 4 0 2 0 0 0, O. 1 6 0 0 ? BRIDGE No.: 4W ORu, q I z COUNTY: ROUTE NO. MILEPOST `k. g.. BRIDGENAME HELL ROARING Wig ND PY n ILO 11.11 )]-14,.15 16 11.18-19 ]0,]1;71 33,34 ]57]6'77.;78.:.79'40 41.;41!4] 4414571,46 l74849750- 4 IfifiI''$$.y MONTH YEAR DEOUACY FPRAISAL CONDITION TRAFFIC SAFETY LIFE - EXPECTANCY '^h 1 ' DATE OF YEAR THIS ?tl R `u n? _ w v tea'.. o. z INSPECTION - i fi ,. OPTIONAL a n ! 31.; Si 5]-54T.55'36 5).i 58 59 60 61.61 61 64'6566 67 68 69 70 71 7173 74 75-]6 77 78 19.80 ` 1 I , IX 4 Z o _ .... ae o a a a .. ?I . INSTRUCTIONS: CODE ONLY THOSE ITEMS WHICH HAVE CHANGED; ITEMS WHICH ARE CORRECT ON THE TOP SHEET SHOULD BE LEFT BLANK. 1 . 2.BE CERTAIN TO CODE THE DATE OF THIS INSPECTION EVEN THOUGH NOTHING ELSE CHANGES. SEPARATE THESE SHEETS AT THE PERFORATION. KEEP THE TOP SHEET FOR YOUR PERMANENT FILE AND SEND THE BOTTOM SHEET TO YOUR DISTRICT STATEAID , 3. ENGINEER. WATERWAY ADEQUACY 'g STRUCTURAL APPRAISAL 9 Not applicable d 9. Not applicable 8 Large well established channel. No hydraulic problems. B New bridge 7 Rock channel R'prapped or natural slope protection. Alignment per r 7 Good condition. Becoming older and slightly worn. pend'cular to bridge. Stream capacity adequate. No scour. .•. - 6 Bridge structurally sound for legal loads. Minor loaol repairs needed. 6 Rock and gravel channel. Gradual slopes or partially r'prapped. Align. '- 0 5 Brdge structurally sound for legal loads. Maio, repoin needed anent adequate. Stream has minor drift. No scour in immediate area jor re d M l , a oa s. 4 Bridge structurally sound for all loods e,cept for over of bridge. .g ` pairs necessary to bring to full carrying capacity. 5 Gravel and sand channel. Unprotected but not steep slopes Minor I g _ fr J Restricted loads (Bridge must be posted(. Repairs necessary. meet problem Stream muses large drift. accumulation. Minor scouring 2 Restricted loads (Bridge must be posted). New bridge necessary. al bridge. L ' I Bridge closed. May be repaired. 4 Sand and mud or grassy channel. Unprotected steeper slopes. Alignment - a problem requiring eventual repair. Stream causes large drift and high 0 Bridge dosed. Must be replaced. i i - Y ng. ng but no undermin flow. Major scour 1, DECK GEOMETRY, UNDERCLEARANCES. SAFE LOAD CAPACITY 0 Mud channel. Unprotected steep banks, Stream overflows banks. Drift may damage superstructure. Undermining problems have developed. t AND APPROACH ROADWAY ALIGNMENT APPRAISALS intolerable condition requiring high priority of replacement. 2 Basicall g y+ y 9 Not applicable ual to present desirable criteria I Immediate repair necessary to put back in service, 8 Condition e { q?7 S P L ^;t q 7 Condition boner than present minimum criteria 0 Immediate replacement necessary to put back In service. f ^ 1. { 6 Condition equal to present minimum crilerio CONDITION in b t l e era & g 9 Not applicable 5 Condition somewhat better than minimum adequacy to la 8 Good mndTon-no repairs needed P 1.11 In place as is inor maintenance as is l I f l t l f i i s or m ace a - s t n p e 7 Generally good condition - potent 4 Condition meeting minimum tolerable limits to be nir al Y vista for major maintenance of re iorit hi h d h i p pr y g o p ring 6 Fair 'on 7 Basically intolerable condition requ +. 2 Basically Lntoleroble condition requiring high priority of replacement 5 Gon rally fn' co d Y f of i I fists for nlnor rnhabihlalicm ? I Immediate repoin. necessary 1o put back in service 4 Marginal condo p m ti I t 1 major rehabilitation l d 1 y'I ? a y iato 0 Immediate replacement necenory to put back in service g Pao and lion-repo r or rah born eq d e f .. 2 Cr,nwl cundiuontho neud for repar or rch b'I-t. i a urgent Facility should r th be dosed Unit the indicated repair is complete r Lf sy f L TRAFFIC SAFETY FEATURES I Cri col cond ron•(aul ry a dosed, Study should dmmmmn the Imsibtlity for re does not meet currently acceptable stondards. t d f S))li 9 ea u 0 Inspecte roper 1 tmpecud feature meen cvrremly ottnptobb standards. p Cr i col cone nnn.lnolny n dined and is beyond repair wM JI4 NT .AU7 t 5 ). r ? DOT t ,a Y T .iPiR1?.n"^::'; ?. wi,d..4 I,, .s ?•.i...:•?. :'..?:u?N'r-: r,?,e rv.. .n'1?V }Ff , 1 Ilk- - . - .. ., .. .ICI ? v + E BERENTSON 101 IN $PELLMAN Governor Secretary STATE OF WASHINGTON t t9 °' / ASS^T C0. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT T15NIST Highway Administration Building • Olympia, Washington 98 04 ?QFVK,%7W3 AQ0N I rc rihun, s .I (7r 67S ua'T City Engineers County Road Engineers -?---- I FILE Bridge Inventory Listing_as Centlemen: y Enclosed are the updated State of l4ashington Inventory of Bridges and Structures (SIPIBS) bridge inventory forms resulting from your most recent submittal of information. Please check to verify that your updates were accomplished correctly, and place these forms in your bridge files for future use. Should you have any questions regarding any edit messages which may be printed on your forms, or regarding any other aspect of the bridge inventory, please contact Dave Anderson at our headquarters State Aid w , Office in Olympia, (206) 753-2888, (SCAN 234-2888). Your continuing cooperation in inventorying and inspecting your _ bridges is most appreciated. g gT Sincerely, "A?.rs v 1 }; t I Y. t +// XL ? ?_ t S 1 ly , S ? >r r ? ?t t a 11'11 F. GF State Aid i ' icor r y57_ ?r T t KE:kl Enclosures F00 ??'???„?` DEC 231982 + ''y {r ,M"{ 3 a JEFFGt2?ERS OFFIIGE 4 klkJ1 ENGI??- ?w?{' 1 w e e j ? m \ !°n ha :' ' o !nl 1 ?1 m ° $g :1 ICI ?S Z - z o F-I ICI N z f ai w U. w w <i f? I ° aI w o ' : I > m a r; . c o V " Ail ?j?`"'... Z Q pp¢¢?? O a w y W N f f, z S 7 N .,.. ... i 1 s ! f S t1JnMOKI co 1 , I I r. O ? n ..J ?a..?? '? ?.?m.v{N »S - e tt .. _._ •jii?,:uu+u: ... _. _... _ ..-.n..._ _CL?,-...?1? ..?.__.-._am ..r al ? 10: I I I j ! I i °° ?' I r I M ? z I =a f ?; I o I oI ? .. M S I I i t; I I F o r ? I ? I ?i - I ?oi,$ k 3 -? I Co ? f_ _ fm ' I W t ? j ?? I I I I ? 1 o ?L I 1o a I ? a 9 "?d I , , K'. Lu 1 i i ? 1 I K I , I I o, r 2 _ T N 2 H a ^; N Y ^ 1/1 a 00 r I^ of I o a, 1OlWz 1 0" 3 Ar`,_$o I O o I a I Iol ? I I I .__ o ? o t I o I I al I oiz? ? I Y I p I O I I .y l p _7 I I. .. . I of ? g 1 - _ .I .a t w,, L MIW ? S, .,o a i AMR I OI 01 p o U? , til? a ?! _a1na 1m 0 Iz W 1 a o M 0, _ 10 u" 1 CD! Q. r- - ?; g? o n.la«, R li ; o z? ' Q u ?°°' 1 I .? r O W 3 9' o i ? ? 1 a I ? . O` N W $ ° ?? ? o A f nt R ° _, o o& a 3 s y M u zl 'r i u o , I ' al R o I v ` o v I? f ' °oavoR ;o i ? I •, ««? 2 O wnaa a O I O ?; O1 s I W s r,11 aoa at f. O ? 10 _._r??O i g? ? O ?? 3 _.. I 1 ! ° R. g I l l 1111 a1YM RI ??. ... _r O I' ' O ?3 I I OI i i O a of R ,?. ° 1 . 2 O .r .m. I f a. OI€ ? I P ? .. z : R `f wv 1 i M $0 AI 1 N iio ?I ? j n 0 ?q I Z I .r ?b '? 1011 M t RJ I , IW . x O I? l iO1 C C ' r <I L ? ?I I a1 I ov i? Lv ? `? I ', ?? « ? ? r'z I a I NCO I I ? I P ? C i °C w o o R ?I ! r 1 I IZ I1VM tR? I I C a O 1 ' .i INib I Ok-'rtai PI ? !C z ?I??? I i Y i O,I I I '. arm ? I I O, I I^ _. w n 1.. M' VINM0 R ..I OI ... 1 ^I M NI . ' R •p M '001tlI0 R ? 11 U O M' 1101 O' NIONII V1 0?p N Z '? ??? I {71. 'd, . a 11110/10 ( 6L HonMIHl S SNwnio:) 31V:)I1dn(3 aH7Nndl3)l .. N, h -n LO li ? l OD co '. ;,w ?:. 100 I I 100 ? I g z A 1-? ,? ? L 1 r d qa-:?•• r " d 7 i jF y a . 1? a LL \ v. r t- o z w w' T Q i- r s u a r w J W O 2 W ' W d VI Q S O OL O u w? .ter x r, > 1 0l i , i ! i j I 1 ° ° ? , I I u c I o ` j 3) 3) (A a o ! In ± + ? ? I ?f W I?1 I ? . ? ? Y W W i j i `? ?? - o 0 0 0 o m o? w A ?- t y- ;r, ?A , : i I r- co rM1 w F0 r- m rN ,r0 °m ,0 co Oh 10.0 lotn 10M ,ON 10 .00 Ina Ulm IZ O U", U", h a U1 LnS Yx Inm N UN" a 2 r N W !z '?- Ino a0` ago Q Q 'z o ah a,o t- a j vu+ vm t u. ? 'p, N vrv 7 .r iF p w v.+ vO w mo, r mF ac Q m.a ! a o 0. min ma Men p p ? RIN a m? w y MCI 0..:. f. N Nm VI m + N? 2 Z i Nln O N NS lB ! NN NO N t .gyp, Q I ..Im I= tih I I ?S +N j T ^O r O 2 ? Ow m f pF 1 ? I o,o I 2 irv a o.r m N Om \ Lu ON S W o U. \ W W W w O i I O I p O W ? W W Q W Q j UO JO 00 o.p wo ao ? O ! W Yf Z,O GS ZN WO WO J- Lu0 ' WV ` WO COO m0 Wo v10 I NO 1/10 ' ]:M1 SY ? J:YI I o m m cz cc u-- 1 °u ° °u-°+ W 11 W N - UN u\ Nm 'AGO wco 'A M1 I.IF ? h i pit, • •7 • • • • • , a I 0 O O YO to m O p O i O I W Q ' 1 W Q W W 1 Q UO? 00 6 UO , 0000 _ ; v i m cx)ww LM1FF Z.1 W m'. ' Z W V , z W K Wm mm i -. W O m0 oaoljc? WU m0' W O m0' UV V W mOViJ - * O I N crv; NO a v vrv'.HO. vVIODO uxv,ux 'y 1??&,7FmC LO o.aaco V O- x :LF N Om 0. i0! ?, O,O; S a a ..I.? ptTTu, i ac ; , t 5 o o wl o o ! s , U^. w j u.... w u..a w j u...l .r w ?'}S r ocuxl Yx xln Inl ccYx U1I atmaux In In Ln x t :9 t 1 `m r ?m r co y M1: Inmmm hhF g?p ?fN .r ? Y t 2 2! I L id 'F r r r , a ? ??,pp,,ll)) I ?. A,fi 9!'T"Y'.4 '+ rt 11 fih , ., 4 ? M I? ;ts K .t-- JOHN SPELLMAN ag - o Governor DUANE BERENTSON c' Secretary STATE OF WASHINGTON E DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Highway Administration Building • Olympia, Washington 98504 • (205)753-6005 ? tow) April 27, 1982 ? G j?" Pt} } '-3 V ° V / w All County Engineers ` s Re: SWIBS Bridge Data ° .i 1982 Essential Needs Study a J ?t Gentlemen: Several of you have requested a listing of bridge information to assist you in r preparing your 1982 County Road System Essential Needs Study. The enclosed printout is being provided for your information and use as you may choose. The bridges are sorted by AASHTO sufficiency ratings, the criteria used to determine eligibility for the Federal Aid Bridge Replacement Program. The letters SD or FO following the sufficiency rating indicate that the FHWA has identified E those structures as being "structurally deficient" or "functionally obsolete" as 4 a reported in the nationwide inventory. An estimated replacement cost, based on average bridge construction contract prices and listed in thousands of dollars, is Included in the printout. Should you have any questions regarding this information, please contact me at (206) 753-2888, SCAN 234-2888. I hope this will be helpful in preparing your needs t studies. Sincerely, 4 7, Ito, °," ? GARY . DEMICH Assistant Procedures, Bridge Engineer WSDOT State Aid GF D:T 12/ 103 Enclosure (1) DECEIVED APR 3 01982 JEFFERSON COUNTY ENGINEERS OFFICE ?!.I I I •1/1 1', Rl ulmpYlmP ON ONhS mOrPInO.Om ul.?uiS00 ? ?. JI-•1? f4mNS'+?1`Om?n.+SinOSm.OS`glnmlllPmRlrm.p 3, ( I WO I, ^ 00000•+tlO00U0000000V0000000 P { ! aU I. 000000000000000000000000000 - 'tr pia N 1 JQizuj- +1- NN N C). 000 IW 00 O ? 000 Q 1 I \v 000 o.= I i cow Co I<1 ; y j a I of 1 NN N ooo CIO a \? 000 z0 1 $ _ 1 a31 00 { O ,. t 000 000 000 (,? 1 >p 1 Rlm 1 m ?..- ooo ?: ,??a yy1., _ 1 h-3 1 ? 7 7 r+d i I <Uj WW 1 ?. mr m0000mOOCp0000000000000 _ T M.1NViN1 tir f pi , f 1 LLZ 1. 0,00mr?T SOn?POM1NP.O.00 MM1 SSP PSInrP,, Inr saa ' .ry ?',T N i Il.•+ 1' O OPY+?1r ?In SInCo Sf?.. OOONS . 1 -iNNU,tt10000 NQ I aN0'r-M tIrC'?..,uiPm PO.-I••I -...... ' I a I'. 0{+N R1.rq.01!}M1M1h1?r Comm mm Comm mP PPP I1?3QH 1. NI rM1d mmlliPrmP-rr.O.O.OrrP-rrmmfrr YQJCOZ ,ITM1Q mmW[pm CoCOmmwWComwaol-mmwmm: I GG f? uj Colo 11 Dmwmwmmmmmmmwwmm I NO S ?QW r .. i { QJ000 1 V ;:7Gp I P?(1`PPV,` PP rl/`P V`PPPPP PP?1`PPV`PPP ?' ?'?? ?. { OQWUY 1 N}?(V KINN .O D .Oa SM'rmmmmmmmmmr mmr ': :? ''". NACRI?T rr .gM1r-Fr mmmmmmmm mrmmm [... f pg? { 1 QO.a{ ai?`4 ra mmM1mmmrmmmrM1mmri>M1mmrmm - ' , ?x ,;F9? 1 z I' IIO,i PCo m?0 P mm cCm mPO? P mm co Comm Comm ,a?>? _ ' ? ?i ? 1=uxaz ?'. r-,m?mm r-m Pmmmmmmmmmmmmmrmmr i ' ?,1 1Z 'lInom{, ?o Colo mm mmmmmmmaimmmmmmmmmm a!'. .E { o ;;,Amm I; a 00.0.ri CoCo mmmalmmma?wmmmmmmmmm _.1 U 1. ( o IIOWUYI', M1OSaS mm rmmr?rmmmmmmmmmmmmm I',. ! i { H {, In in00 00 OOO00OOOoo0 c 000N00?0 I .' HE o 00InNNOS?^+InNSNON r 1 { Q { 0ONm V,.ON mrNa M000mmm OON000 j . 0000 O-+ Oo-?oo0000000000000 y9? 00 000000000000000000 f ! ?` 00p00 000'000000000000000000 o a gooooo0000 o uu oi- 00, 00 a 1{{x 1 x {` { up { Nq omR1 00 NNNNNMNNO Ommm mm.Om.O.q •NO ?O q .Iqy i .? ? ?N NT NNN NN NNNNNNN NN ( I "N 3 I': I gym. r ,ary { ? urx- i' oo`NV:aom aPrM1,a..l,.iorrn-'r .?. Inn-+rr/-rn ,oNa.om(nNrn .gmnmm.ormN CC, w V J '?; { yVl {.? Q QNQQNV HV144000 Q{n V11nQ QQNQQ '.q:,' 'A'iq I 3Y 1? WI LLQLLLL QQ QQLLLLLLLL LLLLQ4QW LL LL Q 1 L?iLLZz ' :3WW WWYJ3W 33W 3]C333W33W iI ?.+mar --N-No N 00 N W i C J W a ' Q u W J Q 0r O z r w J u u a 2 ut. a JJ : 'z ua w? a m J 'u zw 3: U' U OLLI ar3N wz 7.T QQ aJ YI-W$Oaa a UWN .J F-S J?a)!?/Il)O.JWWYW WR?'I-'Jh JJar Ha Ua 2Z a>OU307cVIWdT- +JtOx QrQ O?...WQw JG OZCWJQO f OdU aJ>ax JxmZ QaF-403LL7!'x }mOn'?nPNgTU.+ONOONhPO•t N+?: Coln ; ; .? -1: JN..aNinr??t11T"l•.O v)J"1N.•U-tln 1'in.+.r•..., I ? ? - ?OO.r...,q ?7 ror'N7NOnN.01..f0'JrlnO '_ 41 ?ooonooooooo?o-.oooo%?ooo ?o ? ?ooooonnonononoooooooovno ??o? Poona »o.?oo•, »0000 n ?-+ Vn'V ?^+ NVnn )In n'O ^"`'O JNV`?roN q.+n ', -nOOnN..')......n r o r t'?noa o-r na i i ?P,}cn?nn soil a?noasr?ms } }?.}aoMn ' J) O J a O0 J.3 i.J.I-1 J ? i ? ? n, 5 s? ??rn???,..?? 1 ? m'??j'.'; A.iti•.,t ,s ii. 1 i.' I ? ?-1 < . ,??il? ??.! '? i ? ? T ,L_p v IOHN SPELLMANIN DUANE BERENTSON fs d Governor of (,? Secretary STATE OF WASHINGTON I . DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION L'? 1 Highway Administration Building . Olympia, Washington 9U5o4 . (206) 75 6051 -_. ..I fwr, _ December 3, 1980. s CountynRoadeEngineers f Bridge Inventory Listings y Gentlemen: Enclosed are the updated State of Washington Inventory of Bridges and Structures (SWIBS) bridge inventory 3? forms rPSulting from your most recent submittal of -% informs-ti on. Please check to verify that were accomplished correctly, a your updates and place these forms in your bridge files for future use. ?,. Should you have any questions regarding any edit messages which may be printed on your forms, or regarding ,., ' any other aspect of the bridge inventory, please contact Gary Demich at our headquarters office in Olympia, q, (206) 753-2888; SCAN 234-2888. J Your continuing cooperation in inventorying and inspecting ' ±r' t your bridges is most appreciated. RECEIVED Sincerely. JAN 77 1982 -31TH G El JEFFERSON COUNTY State Aid ineer ENGINEERS OFFICE KE:ds GD Enclosures am I ,A <k a ' N w c? a x. a 0 n. ? , N z u F q d? L i u z w x r a W O ? w ? r a r ? N ^1 O' Y N m O - w p o w w a C a u p p a a a p p ?Q w wu ?i ? a W my w my u, m NQ 0cy ? S ti ? Cal S T_ ? U q U U y U-i U7 Y W re tt r ?: 1 * r 4 Y I + tii J ? ?,'ry wveer n ""tivp' MY - '777 ??11 144 ti rw+? f J li 1; ? i? a I hP hm hf? W hLn wed I4 ~P a hr q' ° I tiN h.-1 ho a ' SOP ,om '0 o 10 'f fA ? it'F 'OU .0M `O N f Rf, i ` - .0..d .fit 1 c tA ' 2 u1l? wi . %Wl ~ u1M Ln 13- V7 4 N W rP Z dtp ? ,gad M a o .rr a r- o_ r;n J U. 'r M D 1? O L w mQ ~ I mn x a m,o a o I .man ' u r ? mri I a m.. I L .Zr ? m0 ! Q I NP I N NC0 /1 .mr NP ' C S Nut i 3 N Nr Nm ? 1.1 I 9 NN S C m C '. NO. 1 yOjQ q ( .rP ? Nr ! I .ah ! pp i .n0 f P -IY .0 j m WO yN m0 .r.d yrU I ~ 1 OP S.+ i o=I oro( cc Or) U I+r oo? °u ° 1 N { Om aUN I a ! ON ym W I 0 m t1Wr i FS+ W i I I I 00 W 00 ao O Z.0 w0 WO m0 NO Sn O + a 00 u-+ W Kh u1 h 1 1 - Z to G ?? { ? i `? n ud I w I I ! P V ..i r1 wy it nd ? N W i ? m; m m ~ ,N fD 00 I 0,00 I 00 DO Op + OO 00 i OO I 00 1 W w W w ??- U 1 LU UJ 1 F- . ?... ..0 1 ? . 00 00 I 00 I 00 00 I UO 00 ! 00 M.0 f ao ao ao a0 0.0 ="0 ! :, =O 1 =m S. =U O I =ti 2.0 1 Zr ZN Zr I Zf i ZN 2r 20 Wry Wr WO I WO WO W.r WO WN WO 1 WO W !yp Wo WQ WO WO m ]O U ]o 60 3r4 •V1 Jm JO rs : m I 00 w a ap 'U Zr WU,O W I rea. mu m0 + m0 i m0 tau I m0 m0 0]O m0 mu '' ! 3 i? 5, V10 ( yf0 QP i Rr+1 I I L NO i KN1 r/10 Q-? I N O N i O 6..? I Rr NO QN NO QN NO QN I O RN ',, ? i SO :1:.} SN 1 S? ' :L SO 20 =O Lu f '. \ 7-. -{ p... 1 O m a i O m O? I m i O.r I O. I 0. O- i OH O.rr a D'a i 04 a 0'a a a a a a 1 a a - ; U - p( h Kh "Up. U- N a K h U.r W a h ~ W a U- W~ a L : 1 4 t1 l ?r + ' U V1 Vlm I NN V1 V1m ? Ncp I ? u l NN ! 0 0 0 U 1 V1m I M NN I ? VInD N NCO ? Et, f` -. ? ...h f.. 4,2 f., P. 2, 22, 2 h I h r ' ! y 1 Y rM1 !, ?u f ! i I Y"' A O ® • A A 11? ?1 IVU r1M1! AI ?" r , ynp ! t \ F w7l leg ,1Y ® ? ? ® ? tl9 ?tlY ! I ? ! , ? ? i I I ! ? ?^b ! i ! I I I 1 ? ! I I ?'? KS j ° co f * 1 o I I ! i ? s++ h r.D I I ? I j ? I ? ? I t .a F. ? a p. ra I ! I i I ? i ? I Y a' ° ? rN I , . ?D^ s 'Din { " nm ON w. r.. Q O a n F. W Q e 0 H a c i co S N I01 Inm ,nr Ina bnm It'= I bno am am Jr a,D a in as am JN ao mP mm mf.- M10 mbn mJ mm m.N. mo I No, Nm Nr Nln NJ I NM NN NO ND\ r11n ym N z -n 00, I om Ur m a a I d a 0 I 1 ( 'O I I 1 I m , m I co .0 ,p a ( •,D m 0,0 .mD ,D OO ; e]0 o0 I 00 00 00 U JO W W W W W F?r1 y??l f. rl ? H? /?rl ? Hr1 Q a a a I a a 00 1 00 00 00 °O 00 n_o I no n_p i ILO ao j no . I N U ! 7r 'In ! = o m xtn i zun zen zo z-+ zN Wr 1 WO Wry Wm WO ! Wu WO I WU WO WO Wp ! WO m0 cu C3 030 m0 coo i m0 HO NO NO NO NO MG QN Qm am ao Q.f QN ZO I Z'D X. LO mm ? Zo J J a O- O^`+ O- UN ON ON mp 00 W a~ UO no 7 zIr W0 WO 030 SJ ON O 0 m •,D 00 W 1? r1 °00 ZZoo WO wo m0 100 21N+ om C;.0 -I `D 00 W 4 00 M° Z- WO wo m0 NO aN ZJ Om m 00 W 1,...1 UU a_O N WU Wu mU NO i Qm ZJ 0r m •,p O W Q~ vO =U W LA WO 67U. aN x.r O `O m 00 W co 0.0 U" WO UJO COO HO a 1n xa Omp 1'a?` dk?x+F ta! t r }?as' w1 °? ?pr? 'r i o n I a a Oc K cc I a w K w C K S r , oo wz I .We o° goo I ?' U- Uo oo C3,0 00 00 00 00 r i k o n u-+ u-+ u-+ un U- u.. u-+ U- u.r Y r , ?? o oa ar r Cg P. Da P. N? i Ceer cer. sr w w w w F N Om In ,n bn N N bn bn U1 GP,- aLU CCU oCN b4 J? cc ON V1m I ::CO m i Nm Nm V1m j Nm Nm tA m Nm v1m N 1 r i 1 It W 0- ?. n. ..r I M I rP r r w " r ..r r ...r j r ? il- , s x ? x x x ,x 1 f a ?- r ?. z co m j m m Co Co 00 ! o0 W W ' W W 00 00 co co f Lo ?s u.O 0.0 n.O DP Om ma, Oul WU I WO W.O 1 Uig I WO i WO WO WO f Wo m0 Cuo 1 [DO V,o NO I NO VIO =r 3...w I J:~ =N i M J 1 0 V, ,z C, Ury? pO, OG oC 1 i w K 04 C3 10 {{yy?J LWh W O[In OC f? p? , NA ! L ,4co 'A Cc N I VI aD , Vlm rA =r =A r _ 1 I L i t? W V z 0 W m? o?s ?m z 3z Z w o Z 3 0 N N -1 Il Tr 3. ? y I ? 1 r i 3 { ? G 1 I t?Q I .. I ,; • I,vsvi r'. , p I of X08 I 3 I .- = I I ? II ' ^ o ko ., I a - - °° J 1 oo I { .y ,_., j o { Igo i .l ; a=o II °3? a si Ij ° 1 o I ..; ulsOOe s i Iz V B 2 i. -. q 2. .. 3?rltlns ; j Io ? I - - I I 7 IOHIW]M ?u t , 'O Z A ? I I u an+ - - { " a I - I a a = -..I °.- SI - iF _ I pp Z Z_, I I? y ??7 - I I ? ? 8 PI _ .o r,pnt=I ? I a YIInI p IpI l j` I I I .I 1 I I n I }. I'. I I I r 1 aWSN,I I 61 - # )I R ?_ P k. .noun i It Ii4 ? +I ?{ I' ? a I I ? I I I?? Q •--- ? R- I i 1 1? I I ;z? noaHi S SNWnloJ 3ivondn0 IHJNndk3N ;cl; ;00I ml I co0 1 ?• =r 1 a hF '?y ?LG-r ??ii em i"'§Yn{t4crs4?:it <t u,.- 1.! 47u.-.,,771 11yTi;i ?:r?? ?I:'i. aMmvf??? t',1,}54>???(?yp•?,n? nr I ?M11.7•?i I? AI 1y F ?M1 ? ? E?+a 1 i I 1 cl) 0 z Q m ?2 N K m O z oz V C) z N 3 0 N - _ulwn + - -- or?lron? - 'I ? ^? h l OO I Ise ?' ?? ? ? nt I ?{ ( .I Y7NM0 RI n OOlifl? a a H _ . Y Y?IE " . p?=?? N? - ... 1 I j I? J i R I I i -l iWl p ?`1 _ - {Y}7?? a k?'?? ?i . ... I N10Nlla i Yraua 2 ? b oR ? I I R I ? 6L Hc)nOHHI S SNwnio:) nvoildna 'HJNn d k3)1 Ni cM 1 I 1 00 i co co i co CO 1 ? + ?- 1 41?? ?pppp5? r k'f<1G'28;:1??mv?rv7^' ? "+*R' ' Tt.l }'1(A\'. .I r 'Y'4I w.f 7 'ett? Y (f ? ? ?, 7 f f{ I L i r ? 55 ?r?y 1 S 1,, 1? 4 Iii 4Rt? pyyy?y,?,,y"y t WAS "A" • ?sF a? _ ? LL ory? ; ,? j r? 2 2 u"wn? - a?r+a+ow f I-A 1.3 life r ) I V j I Y)NMO R' •_.__ J- I _ _iSNI , ?3I nl a 0 I` VrIonC,i x '•71 I .. 4 L. ,...i._.L_..__ _.. R _ ..r ?.. _ R. .. __! R..._ .?. .I. R! . . R!. I 6L H°onONH1 S SNWn10J 31Y:) Ildna ' HJ Nn dA3N ?N? I iM 'Q I ) t . . o ..._._ .p( I ! ?? I . I LO ? ' h co! ? ?co i 0 01 I j I e' g? ? a! I oR ? r a T w COUJi} Ytd Itt:R yy S T Cfj .?CINEER OAST. ( f ? fl F4 - - OFF:Ci (ric!4%E R--- oNtRS-- ROAD e -- ridge Tnveni:ory- - J - FILE '?.,/,,,• I Gentlemen: This is to inform you that we have changed some county and city bridge inventory data in Washington D.C..though doing so opposes our policy of not altering data - submitted by you. It was done because a significant problem arose which required immediate attention. A change in the FHWA apportionment formula threatened to reduce our fiscal year 1982 bridge replacement (BR) funding from approximately 19 million dollars to approximately 7 million dollars. Inquiries revealed that our interpretation of "tolerable" roadway widths for bridges was not in conformance with the FHWA's interpretation, and that this was restricting the number of bridges considered "functionally obsolete", an item newly added to the apportionment formula. According to our Division FHWA office, AASHTO's width criteria for bridges to remain in place should be used to define " " . Using that criteria resulted in an increase in our total square tolerable footage of "functionally obsolete" bridges that we estimate will increase our apportionment to approximately 10.5 million dollars. " The balance of the apportionment loss appears to be due to the inclusion of deficient w off-system bridges in the apportionment formula. Washington has approximately 8,000 bridges, while 17 states have 15,000 or more. With all bridges now being counted, our percentage of the total has decreased considerably. Because any updates to be considered in the FY82 BR apportionments had to be in Washington D.C. by June 1, 1981, we made the decision to update via computer rather than contacting you. Should you have any questions regarding our action or the attached table, please contact Gary Demich at (206) 753-2888 or SCAN 234-2888. Sincerely, ; .. ? E l ? ? u h EITH E N V State Aid E ier KE:ds GO Attachment p G V cc: District State Aid Engineers w/attach. JUL 11981. N C N JEFFERSO 0$ CE S R :` g s tt a E ENGINE r , ' ? y.? , : _sY = JOHN SPELLMAN . ?1j Governor R,_ F STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATIO Highway Administration Building • Olympia, Washington %504 June 29, 198 City Engineers/ County Engineers Changes to t (B-60.1) .c-_- , 4 ,? P9 s ve't? .a ATTACHMENT COUNTY ENGINEERS CITY ENGINEERS JUNE 25, 1981 t' ry - The following table is based on "TABLE 9, MINIMUM STRUCTURAL CAPACITIES AND MINIMUM ROADWAY WIDTHS FOR BRIDGES TO REMAIN IN PLACE" from the AASHTO Geometric Design Guide for Local Roads and Streets, Oct., 1969. CURRENT ADT MIN. CLEAR WIDTH (Ft.) r'n 0-249 20 250-749 22 750-3799 24 3800-5800 30 For ADT's above 5800, multiple lane criteria were used. Minimum width was cal- a y' culated to be ((Number of lanes) x (11 feet/lane)) + (8' for shoulders and median) Any bridge narrower than specified above was automatically updated by placing a 2" in field A-80, "Deck Geometry Appraisal." PLEASE KEEP THIS SHEET WITH YOUR SWIGS CODING MANUAL FOR FUTURE REFERENCE. Using these parameters is essentia if we are to prevent the oss of a substan- tial portion of our federal-aid funding for bridge replacement. RECEIVED ; JUL 1 1981 JEFFERSON CO ' 1 { UN rY ENGINEERS OFFICE -:z a? Port Townsend, WA 98368 JEFFERSON COUNTY (206) 385-3505 e " . Gary A. Rowe, Director Robert G. Nesbitt, RE., County Engineer ' September 4, 1987 Mr. Dave Bowers, P.E. Bridge Maintenance Engineer Washington State Dept. of Transportation P.O. Box 9327 Olympia, WA 98504-9327 t RE: RENTAL OF U.B.I.T. Dear Dave, y " K Jefferson County would like to enter into an agreement tb rent the ' t State s Under Bridge Inspection Truck for one day. , We need to inspect the County's Portage Canal Bridge and anticipate that the inspection will take approximately 2-3 hours. Jefferson County will provide traffic control and the inspectors. Additionally, we would like to perform the inspection on October ' 8, 1987 if this is compatible with the trucks schedule. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to contact me. d Sincerely, d`? r /`V ruck a Laurie Construction Engineer XC: RDS 03.50 PWA: 02 100% Recycled Paper r t§? 7a? t?y^U"" ? h5 i ,p?, ? vh?'tiR?u '. ?NDS07A#Pi?irt 4i rib?A[? ? - S '? i f 1, + ?w ? it J I V1 J 1 Y 1"?' r dJ ? T ?? { fJ f,?? " r Ae ) e u ?xk. rte.: 3 P ,. i I 6 " c i S YF A-4-83r Batch #SE130r 5 gallons. B-4-83, Batch #SE130B, 5 gallons. C-9-83r Batch #SD166, 10 gallons. TT-P-641, Type Z, Batch #5G137, 5 gallons. .;i 1 ) Respectfully Submitted, L Roger Chamberlin General Manager Sworn and Subscribed before me this 30th day of July, 1985. Notary Public Z ?th State of Washington, residing in Seattle, King County. 760 ALOHA STREET • SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98109 • (206) 284-1040 d ?. 71: ' . LIMITED WARRANTY The products described on the face hereof are warranted merchantable as defined in Title 62A.2-314 of the Revised ' Code of Washington -Uniform Commercial Code subject to any exclusions and disclaimers set out below. THERE ARE NO - OTHER WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, WHICH EXTEND BEYOND THE DESCRIPTION /SPECIFICA'I'D S ON THE FACE HEREOF UNLESS AGREED TO IN WRITING RYAN OFFICER OF SELLER AND ATTACHED HERETO. ' EXCLUSIONS AND DISCLAIMER OF WARRANTIES ii A. If the products being purchased hereunder are primarily for personal, family or household use, the qualities and f r, haracteristic- specifically that are being disclaimed and excluded are durability and length or sarvice of any coating - Products or fYdt such coafing,products will exactly conform to chy sample, chip, facsimile, or model by way of color or appearnca. l B No ve rbal or unattached written affirmation of fact, statement, or promise by Seller, its agents employees, or dealers - ,, astothe prod cis sold hereunder shall be regarded as part of this order nor create any express or implied warranty that such ,. - ,, prod-ts'Shall conformn to any.. such claimed affirmation of fact, statement, or promise. Nor shall the exhibition or - •_ - dumonctrafion by Seller, Its agents, employees or dealers of any sample, chip facsimile, or model by way of color or appearance b,regarded , as part of the basis of the sale hereunder norcreate any warranty, express orimpiied,that the whole of tho product-sold hereunder shall exactly conform to the sample, chip, facsimile, or model by way of color or appearance, C. The Purchaser's' sole remedy in the event the products sold hereunder are defective in any manner expressly - v,arranled hereunder orwarranted byimplicatlon not expressly disclaimed hereunder shall be the return of the productsand - the r,eoayment of the price,or replacement of such defective products at Seller's option as provided for hereinafter. 0 u. purchaser determnes in its judgments that such products are defective in not meeting any warranties provided for - hereunder, Purchasershali return a sufficient quantity of such claimed defective product in its original condition to enable - Seller to test and analyze the product. II Set ter concludes from such test /analys'is tha t such or od uct is defective as claimed, ` { ! Sellerwiil, in its sole discretion,' either replace at the place of delivery to Purchaser such of Seller's products as have been - determined defective or pay to the Purchaser the purchase price of the unused products in their original condition or pay to Purchas r the ' urcha e i f th J e p s pr ce o e mused products in their original condition and reimburse Purchaser for return trnnsportation.or shipping charges of such defective products as Seller directs be returned. . E Selturshnll have no liability to Purchaser or others whomsoever for incidental or consequential damages inclusive of but not limited to those delined in the Uniform Commercial Code, State of Washington. RCW 62.2.717, in the event of injury to anY.person or propertyarismg out of Purchasers use or transfer to others of any of the products. Should Sellerfor any reason rF? t' or muse bedetormined llable to Purchaser or others whomsoever arising out of the products sold herein Seller's only obligation and limit of liability to any such person or entity shall be to refund the paid purchase price to Purchasers order or replace such products In like or similar original container. THE`FOREGDING WARRANT AND ANY OTHER WARRANTIES EXPRESS OR IMPLIED UNDER STATE LAW , , AND NOT DISCLIAMED.HEREIN SHALL EXPIRE THIRTY (30) DAYS AFTER PURCHASE OF PRODUCTS. SOME - STATES DO NOTALLOW LIMITATIONS ON HOW LONG AN IMPLIED WARRANTY LASTS AND/ OR THE EXCLUSION OR S . LIMITATION OFINCIDENTAL OR CONSEQUENTIAL UUFF????NN++??ALBS, THEREFORE, THE ABOVE LIMITATION ARID EXCLUSION MAY NOT APPLY TO YOU THIS WARR VES' 'G . , . ANTY F YQU SPECIFIC LEGAL RIGHTS, AND YOU MAY ALSO HAVE OTHER RIGHTS WHICH VARY FROM STATE TO STATE . DELINQUENT PAYMENT=COLLECTION COSTS Billings not paid within thirty (30) drys of receipt of invoice., are delinquent, Should Purchaser br r oir r d I' eau ent in f?, St qG q :?n?ty ^, P1ymerit, the entire unpaid balance s' 1t unnudiataly become due and payable in lull and Purch r " c r gr u, la '. y i hne m Payment chargo of one and ono hall norcooill'.:rblonthe unpaid balance per month from date, of del iquen!.y(lot tot- L.erl l eighteen percent (1134i) perenn unit. flu rhr cr.;na l l fort her pay ronsona ale cal toction or a t torney toes, Cods r,rd; Prmses incurred by Soifer in the avant this ac(,ounl is reterred to a collection agency or to an attorney for collocUon + r A N 1 1 1 ?µ T *.. 777 f1 4rf tl :sl T?. iii ,:" /daC. ,1 r `•L r Mi,a} ? ,?W' '` 1 ¦¦ I , k ?? „ .5 , . .,1 .eau ??/ l i. ? 1 On, All, - Yd l.c15rAW LT7 MS IQ?- Gr\GenG 'Cd 8?t1GE; l-c' Qet/2725 7bt t? Y ?zcY s.1815 z ?h } GLEJ?YX! , Ta ,Tv191? ?? ?BYIOVE?F/}GC iZc?s i- ir7Nlt??r9TC `r ?1?ioiZ ` ' ' ' ?R4? MTI N Cr Oti/ERr c.,9 i rH a ? Iq-LLOz.J TD ?TGY ?' I ttsr - 1 T? - '-1 - 8 3 W ?o tro 17 `?- n _ U. .. GC3vE(z W I:T'H_ F.l N_I 5 tJ 0 T j C,Awiwiz6b_ Me-T79 ?- 3p?c l c_Y?Tt (37.LS _ E Y 2vsT U o w r w IrN -t T.P. _ 6 LF L Z I P C. pIZ I M. ?-7Z- 3? ,. C,vvt! 7?- w I T7 /. G- 9- Pi 3 F I p t s N,. G o I4 T - .• w k ,. EVE7LG2G-z°'xa Cdzc2 . s40,4 -] F ` , -vj_ ?]} d t?Y g S 1? SP? S? ', k , e ?4 Y' R, M 7 M W CII ??.ff\rt ?1 ?!1:?? L }hL (t A_ 1" i ? 1 Q W ` ` RW i p r4DQT?, t?? T t?.lG K ? - ? 2 • GE} yg 91G S EZ_c_ CHe7 3ltit 7 . F w ?EVeTr.>`K- ST?}?uDr9-R.D ? s95 ? °'? coro iz 3-4o4 c-v-rz G 2se? . pcO?00D a F:T. 1+-14-S`) s9 C- g - _71 9?$OG?y ?'83' 300 ??, y C ? ? ? ? L. IC. Its' C?n.rnZ ?19P?lIE plg-IfUT ITT `FO 3-s dom. C- FIC7-? He'lw Fuverz?e-c.,smeao+ar? 9e6s N L ?k 695aa flZ//rlE,Z 6/gLV• 777- 4I1 1? ?, $: GoLoaz ?co3Nc`F7 e S ziaec DUST Vie- . 5 ox 7Yp Jrz)z- ? i /? 9 W R' 4 -scf C- 1 k as 9 - 7 C.g . r P r l ?'?. t 1 ' I J?1p.lY ?,?y{{?? ;1 '?IYY'GAY'?? . ?? { . .. .._ ,., ?, . ? ,?.. I...., .? ? ..... .. ,..', ..,....... ... I n v 411, r ? 1710 ttV - tt 4 x ??? ! ??? r t?? `arr' 7 i i l d i 7 flaw C + ? ;? l . i? ;i Cv Y1 r A 3 Z t ?• ( pert V S 511 T? - 5 :t i i"$ daT Id[ Y^W ih?S svu ?H6?"+MG 89? JL0uu 6 Y ??? &A ROft'i FLETCHER CREEK BRIDGE f ' 1 {? f ? ? x lhF I"jJ:. - 17 fie Fi ',f V 'Y r s fM ,.. r . 4 ;t(ffJPs.,s k N Fd6 k, 1 r° - 5 Yq - RI-DG SIT + - --"I .- NH 111 GENERAL HIGHWAY MAP JEFFERSON COUNTY r r 2 r . WASHINGTON SPARED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS HIGHWAY PIAHNING DIVISION ° 1IIV ? N COOPERATION WITH THE U.S DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION w • 1t C 1 ,• I v ?. / o Hw loom ,Hm .ro 1970 Re?• o r .?ey • • S [ 3 OF 3 MAP SHEETS M I r r.' .r [! ? ri 'o v I . zN _ Y AIR. uw ." .. 5o R1 B?„ ? „ . I II ? R/ (NN u n -l- rlll ? ? •, 1 .1GIm, -TH-4.1 NDATDM -"! Tl. 447uILICEITSRS>s• w-VIVIll ,•,•,•,T^=7.7fiMIrQ37m+NIw W I 9Yrv N Y t i lk t,Ylp "A, '47,"" ?'! flY } Y ` p 1 f I u::_ lT Y 1 r I Fi 4S ,f % j L i a ?t ._ 1 - % ANDERSON CREEK BRIDGE r 7 GENERAL HIGHWAYMAP JEFFERSON COUNTY WASHINGTON CLALLAM COUNTY M ?y y ID rry L_' ? Div y ! , r ?r _...? I ` _ it ? _ _ ? ti ' ??? 4, 1?! s d ' ? j • d v + l ? wk , . ?' , tilt 4,.' ?r? 124' V GENERAL HIGHWAY MAP JEFFERSON COUNTY _ WASHINGTON I•''? y GLALLAY COUNTY l t I s . y E 4= 1 F•• i ` . w - - _ - ? H I01 • - ?v4?.-?. • + •• to ? ••2 •• Ir •.; ? 1 W •?ry 1 / C T •• L yi . ROCK CREEK BRIDGE F' GENERAL HIGHWAY MAP JEFFERSON COUNTY . .. WASHINGTON •?ri CLALLAN COUNTY - ? ILL a ? ' r w 101 v t 1 .... , + yA ?I o I 4 , ?• 3 '. +Y ?r LC 5 L f ' ?' 8 _ U, a. k I .,p d + § y \ L 5 4 1 M 101 f +w - i..T ` - . fin} } ' u • ' qq ? . : { V t ?L? . ? : ` 1 '? N ?? w NL= - ?,_ M L 1 ? r ? L ? 1. . 3•. 'T? 1 ' y I f Y + i t 4 + r f r` r+ "e:t?l f ! 1I / t LI ' • ? l ?? .' w' ?I. JI w ? 1.• ( i w w w 1. __ 1 ^' I b ? •.?. ' s, IOIYCONIC f1WAC1W+.MMiNMRAIW M1lN1 Lerw+1 NY IMNY NNO.r+YA ? yg 4c mn?..;a? x,. .,r "'!' '? 4t i r 11' TOWER CREEK BRIDGE r "uN +p GENERAL HIGHWAY MAP JEFFERSON COUNTY + ? WASHINGTON CLALLAM COUNTY \ 1 ?• 8 I _ I a1 i ,• f u 1-9 ? L •V ' +?? ? -. , ?.-.... _ i- alt ttf?6 ' 1 ,it7 '? - R1lYOONN: MtkC.MW-M1fN MYI1MJN OaTUM ,Aw-.1 r-Nw- I ' `?Jf 11 v,'1'J? +? ? ????'?.`'rynY.'?????k ??M?'?h?VaP'I?k'711A?WQyi'reH+?.Y?I?v? 'Y1? ; ,,.i ?I?? . • w . t _ ? i k ? 77 s? ?"7r ? ?.?Yx S? rr r p A` [ C' i Fv 4 nvti p .l s A# w, m y wr? x, DOWANS CREEK BRIDGE r .1. ia• Au. - 5, GENERAL HIGHWAYMAP - JEFFERSON COUNTY WASHINGTON - !,f _• CLILLAY •COUNTY - 1 S - D E' T 101 ••1°0' ` ` .. n ? F8 ?L ly'' w f t q 101 i ? (J? N - tl S11 ? 1j:\ _ jam: 1• ? .i f '\ e f! i t ?? ?f 1 1 - 1 ? M y shy' ' 1 J ) - Irwroab ?oriaroN-«am.w.lrv.e ruw - APP" W waw a„! :,. 4r¦'?1 i ?.'^??.:'i•`?t,1: ?t'q ' .', ?141?X 1;??? sn7. '?'? '?r'"?'3r r? 3"Y a?? t r,.???i1j+4Pv?r .. J. ?1.?,G'rt•4" J h,h `°'t:"?1 ^`.n. I? ??...°`i': ' 1 .?? c OWL CREEK BRIDGE r GENERALHIGHWAYMAP JEFFERSON COUNTY • WASHINGTON CLALLAY COUNTY ? L,': ? a e iec e 1 1 i ? % r -` - , r ! ? w /- .Y n !EJ Y At 11 AAAA *GE IT 4 \ a N + r ?' c N ? 101 - ; f.> t ^'Y., \ ' r r t i .1 ?nL T r r,- r ?Y t - - roLKO!?C MORCTIdr-NO+TI UVwPN+WIVM Mwa?br.uv+wrnr• . ? _ 1 r ? ? :i ?yyy GENERAL HIGHWAY MAP JEFFERSON COUNTY WASHINGTO ' CLALLAY COUNTY y ? 1 ` ?L d = n , r' ... t 8/ • ` u y ry ? i ' G' . 'O-t•+? -' .S - 4 t t 'SL .. r {t1 I E U d a1• T_ l?. ? ? ?? < N N ? 101 +w.. ---f-- ? _ •Ly \ Y e IIXKONIC MOXCICN-TN AY<.MIN WIUM AlNr W1-. NOarT r ?_., ? ? 3 .:1F I LL - 9. HUNTS CREEK BRIDGE A n? GENERAL HIGHWAY MAP.'' a R' JEFFERSON COUNTY .? WASHINGION - .- 4, F EroO x.c N v '? v c.\ PORT (., .u[vxx. ?•? _•_ I .YTj it i+ G TOWNSEND• ?•? "+.`a! c? i a° IN1 2 _ t ? I x101 \C3 s••• ? ?? IADNDA?.E• 1 NMDLxM I RI 4 .; I , r < arn.r VI r. A01.ODR I ' I } 'Ta5 I i ,r '1 ? 1 i •c I .. ? I r I ` . J OAK ?? BA/ •7 Ir. ? !1'Y+ , _. y..1i V a i , i ?I \CNIN4CVy « 1 ,J y ? 1t I.ara-? •?I D.[or.ry }' I . . ?. ?1" m ? i ?f. ? _ a ? I? l ? Es ?: ? w4 rr I eAYI ? ? I ??7`I lor ?3'dtl iA.s? ?!+` a 4a. .1 ,. _?riuYyl .,A^,x,.+.,.V a n '.u • d ..- f;l a 7r 4J: ? ???a, 't+ ?'? P! t:., t ?° ? p " ? Fa ? ? ? i r.? , } Lc ' Ctl? ?• _ y i . f l ?31 ?r/ Ir^1 l '.Y 1 ' " ? i ?? t J V f ,, I IJ yF 1 r r !?C . 7 ? 1 11 r4'v .e ?. ?._:_. " u Aal ,IA{ DAP J Wo 'nom + A ._I OAK yN _ BAY 7 r f^ t 1} -IMACUM r P PI .. , . ,; N . a Fj9' CE NTEfl ? ? ? I w /101c e.•... / gyp. ? +g PORT I I 1,? .: LUDLOW '` I e IID - i "n 1 ? •?1,5 J . " LELM1ND a r ? ? .n to I ? 4 Sl r V e YT i?in ? l, I / `ii.l? '. ... g I ,. IN, NARAO# Tr I T t ?? ' CIIIICCNE I ? 6^ I '? ?r^" _ '1 ., y '. I I MTT)? '. u -M? T tT MM s; , 1 . 4 t t? tYo J. sy n p ,? e M 5 + 7'., h ? 11 ? Wg? 'a ? t t?1? ? a q Y a 7, la 1 x w • mow ? p / h '' I .? % . a .. Ile 1. GENERAL HIGHWAY MAP JEFFERSON COUNTY ;aA - WASHINGTON W I LLOUGHBY CREEK BRIDGE LLALLAM COUNTY . r / J ; IT, - _ UI tl E Sit s - T pv r 1( I /1 .3`'??? r ....t}(.. TI' .? I'• ? _ ° I T7. ? I • ? .. ,r - \I I ,. .. ? ? 1 ?. 5.. ? .. y.Tr ?M'YM1 99 Y" y ?f cl' 1 ?M ? l? f?F ?,? ? "?""° ;4+Gwur?w,'rdttl?491f?TihTylYfSr;,;,r d Jtiia?!' . <ypr7c,dw- I N ? ?i r - l J ;f f i v t i ! r 1 4 ? ti \( i I 1 t A'.._ ? .. ?. .., .. .. - , _. - ,.. ... . .... I o ' i jg& JEFFERSON COUIITY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT INSTRUCTIONS FOR BRIDGE INSPECTION 1985 The work to be completed by the consultant consists of the in- spection of twenty-seven (27) bridges at various locations in Jefferson County. The inspections shall be conducted in accor- dance with the AASHTO "Manual for Maintenance Inspection of Bridges 197811, and these instructions. BRIDGE LIST The Bridges to be inspected are as follows: NO. NAME LENGTH TYPE YEAR OIW Fletcher Creek 78 feet Concrete 1974 02W Barlow Creek 23 feet Wood 1977 03W Anderson Creek 87 feet Concrete 1974 04W Hell Roaring Creek 120 feet Concrete 1982 OSW Alder Creek 67 feet Concrete 1972 06W Rock Creek 83 feet Concrete 1973 07W Tower Creek 71 feet Concrete 1973 08W Oueets River 626 feet Steel Truss 1931 09W Hemphill Creek 31 feet Wood 1977 IOW Dowans Creek 81 feet Concrete 1974 IIW Owl Creek 74 feet Wood (log) 1973 12W Maple Creek 81 feet Concrete 1972 ( Closed ) 13W Hurst Creek 67 feet Concrete 1969 14E Chimacum Creek 33 feet Concrete 1953 ISE Hunts 27 Feet Concrete 1971 16E Little Ouilcene River 64 feet Concrete 1955 17E Yarr 25 feet Concrete 1955 18E Portage Canal 670 feet Steel Girder 1951 19E Railroad Overcrossing 96 feet Concrete 1953 21E Old L. Ouilcene Riv. 59 feet Earthfilled Arch 1916 ( Closed to traffic ) 22E Old Linger Longer 112 feet Steel Truss 1953 ( Rodgers Street ) 23E Linger Longer 81 feet Concrete 1969 24E Rocky Brook 47 feet Concrete 1964 25E Meyers Creek 30 feet Wood 1977 26E West Uncas 61 feet Concrete 1964 27W Willoughby Creek 60 feet Concrete 1962 Leland Creek 34 feet Wood Ukn ( Closed to traffic ) See the attached vicinity naps for the location of each bridge. ?z ?q 3 F 1 a ire 9 w t 1;' ,. ? ? ?1 ] pp r ? ?r _.huwtR ? I ? f Y ? ? 1YY I 1 6 ? 1 MIS ? ? _ :? 6 ? [? r: 7??j t y ?a?itufll ? , • ! I 1• ' 1 i C ( I S {? N t3 NIJ ? v \\ ? ? U > ^ 1. in \ i.. \) J L ,e O Y Y Y y L O L Y y O L Y G O C U N V N Gl di p U N d V , C - Y N Y 01 Gl > U 1 Gl Y OJ Y d C '0 > G ? O. Y o O L V C L N y L y y N• L V r K ^ L U Ul y L U y L U E j V V U O J p L L L t N O U N N u y C O O 0 L. L. m y? O f L L L V u L 3 aJ w r C 3 N ?J L A N C N L • L ?- u O z W m ¢ ¢ 1 - O' x 0 1 S S d 0: 7 J K 3 N r1 f b n p Oi O •- N n m °' R N N N N N N ^ N A 2 N M' ? O D\ O 7 fJ e Y T 0 0 O 0 0 O t o m • O? --? O N N N M c N t N 1 ? O N C N 1 r ; 1 { 77 i F M1T+"" l ??gg L ,r 1 r ,, 3 ? h 6?f w? d aria, 4 d t r? I Y - n yy ° i h1 ' oo b ? C n d n c( o n n i\ l? t ? ? ; ? ? L t W o ? t • A l 1 o Q y ? n V ? ' ? ^ m \ `? ?• g ll01 v qr ? ? ? a ? ? U U r: ? ? ? ? u? ; Y Y V C C L gl ?` ' y Yyy L > aC (j f QYG? J W L' w u B O N O V C J O m qy1 ` L . C L ^ V7 8 L ` L V - 7 O W zr p 'S N L y ? ` i x s !?j x y S o 0 ` z a C ? o V o 41 = J o Y R',li' P OI A O A 1 0 o N 00 O•+ I ^? r- ? N N N iy Y ' R y Rap ? 4 +J2'!Nr "SP Lrr ?l r F..?. r. r.!? f •' ,r J a « h . , ,1 ao- y Pjjj? 1 kk `I1 p 11'? .I ? ,,tt c 0 i ? o.; n n .; n ? n ? 1 n t? r n i\ ? r\ t n n n n t? n l\ 7 7 7 7 7 Y Tq Ff 3 irl `• I ti ': ' ` I` y f k i \ t} _ r I I 1-. ? I ' C Q Y1 G C y S t`f W N W ? u "T a OL ? C o N UL . . I .. ¢ ` ? ?+ ? ? r L r ? yy L V ? ?_ N ?e V V g g u ? :. y O ? qp ? J L m L N L ? I yy?? L L u ? L ? ? Z b ? r ep ? ? y? i+ y?f? ` ? L C N W q - d ? ? tY.I K L T ? r 2 l - r ? G p• x Y S S G . J M A N m QI R N ryry N ? N yy?? N ??pp N ^ m N ? ? ? xx ?? 7 - ? 'Y + ,ycaf d.+.uw?u Z c ti vF_ a x JEFFERSON COUNTY BRIDGES WE ST: 1. Fletcher Ck. 2. Barlow Ck. (Fossil Ck.) a 3. Anderson Ck. 4. Alder Ck. 5. Rock Ck. 6. Tower Ck. 7. Queets River =. 8. Hemphill Ck. 1 <, 9. Dowans Ck. 10. Maple Ck. 11. Hurst Ck. 12. Willoughby Ck. 13. Hoh River 14. Hell Roaring Ck. F 15. Owl Ck. EAST : 4 r i 1. Chimacum Ck. -2. Hunts Ck. F " 3. Quilcene River 4? a 4. Yarr s Chimacum Ck. x 5. Portage Canal i 6. Milwaukee RR Overgrossing -4. Old Linger Longer (Quilcene Bridge Relocation) 8. Linger Longer 9. ' Rocky Brook Ck. ' -10. Meyers Ck. i tk-> r11. West Uncas ,12. Jackson Ck. 13. Little Old Quilcene River T r? ? ?y 14E Ch imacum Creek,_; 33 feet Concrete cw#/r=.+"rt d9SI-°s Ac' ?' 15E Hunts 27 Feet Concrete"CIP! - ^'/PP,I 71- H2oA9• 16E Little Quilcene River 64 feet Concrete=`? ?• 955-- LZ?• _1IE Yorr 25 feet. G ...Goncrp?teets?1.""•. J955,y..h. ` P:o:1-fIj-8E Portage.Conol i• 670 feet irderxr°'°J'1951 Y`Steel G Hitcr• 19E Railroad Overcrossing 96 feet - Conc7c a-?{tv ?? 753------- ' 21E Old L. Quilcene Riv. 59 feet Arch wo-rta?r Earthfillet? - `__ 22E Closed to traffic ) OId Linge-r Longer 112 fe _et ---------r? - !S_t-eel- Tffuuss APIR.n f? H I'51t ( Rodgers Street ) w_ co?rcr ns:?iw+23E Linger Longer fit feet ConcretepzT -.¢,1,;1969- tsz 24E Rocky Brook 47 30 feet f ConcreteTn,a. s+-.,1964 - ?M•-f_Z_--+_,,: t 011 1977 W d P 6 4 1 n 25E Meyers Creek eet oo Lt - •. w Nx?s?r,126E West Uncas 61 feet Concrete?;;?oe.. ,µJ964 4 t ` 27W - "-' Willoughby CreekC4„M • Leland Creek -60 34 feet feet 62 Con creten>zr I.f, 1 Wood 't Ukn. y t •, e U ( Closed to traffic ) , r See the attached vicinity i mps for th e location of each bridge. urtp l??t i... .x?a.??, as n?Frr??•4r t e^F i i?, .,,r,r i, ? ? •.?..mr, awrruwT n .at», i } F J 1L?? { . ? `f 4L ? ??YY i f ?a 79,140 i4 f4 ° l l ! , r? y J N 4 ?ry' ?, ? T! i111? t L t ? M? I ti: i } t it ryr.? ? 1 ' INSTRUCTIONS FOR BRIDGE INSPECTION 1985 The work to be completed by the consultant consists of the in- spection of twenty-seven (27) bridges at various locations in Jefferson County. The inspections shall be conducted in accor- dance with the AASHiO "Manual for Maintenance Inspection of Bridges 1978", and these instructions. ND. MANE LENGTH TYPE YEAR OIW Fletcher Creek 78 feet Concrete L9-7A) 02W Barlow Creek 23 'feet Wood 197 IT Gtu-t AM 03W Anderson Creek 87 feet Concrete 1974 04W Hell Roaring Creek 120 feet Concrete 1982 - T>RT 05W Alder Creek 67 feet Concrete 1972 06W Rock Creek 83 feet Concrete 1973 i prS ""S 07W C Tower Creek 71 feet Concrete . 1973 $iN_. a?E I -Queets River 626 Jeel__Trus.s. _ .193.1 Et 1 '" 09W Hemphill Creek 31 feet Wood PTAW-j 977 11 wY IOW_ Dowans Creek 8.1._ f_St ConcLete _1 2 -- _?d1 Y+ -Owl Creek 74 feet Wood (Tag) 19?ft- i12W Maple Creek 81 . feet Concrete 19-- ( Closed ) 13W Hurst Creek 67 feet 14E Chimacum Creek 33 feet 15E Hunts 27 Feet 16E Little Ouilcene River 64 feet 17E Yorr 25 feet .18E Portage Canal 670 feet 119E Railroad Overcrossing 96 feet 21E Old L. Ouilcene Riv. 59 feet ( Closed to traffic ) ?>22E Old Linger Longer 112 feet ( Rodgers Street ) 23E Linger Longer 81 feet 24E Rocky Brook 47 feet 25E Meyers Creek 30 feet 26E West Uncas 61 feet 27W Willoughby Creek 60 feet --'28E Leland Creek 34 feet ( Closed to traffic ) Concrete 1969 Concrete 195 -- Q w Concrete 197L] Concrete 1955 - Concrete 1955 '"i P..r?ti?r•. Steel Girder(T )1951- t r? Concrete m'-6 1953 u? .py,.., Earthf i l led Arch 1916 ' .44,- Steel Truss 1953-..? 4r,ji, STo,4 ? ie-..., A,v.f. Concrete 1969- Concrete 1964 Wood 1977 °9' GAB Concrete 1964 Concrete 1962- _._ -Wood-._ Ukn. t fi a so9 • s k AF a Y Q - 4-I)r°N , - CxO adJ/od ! /?oiraTl io?t -- C,o rro l s . k G& rxK'.vey?. 4r s U r ck9 aq ? l - 3 ? r o7?t / ( g ` ? ! H '? I 154?..:r? (?-- G?.4(vY.1?C e?t,ll W {ONj i ! G LGIC' d-f?0. ?Q Q LTIONS ? N ,ia ! ?3? 5fRf .. :.T .r?s7CJ.R ?y •TI?':^:'N.: ? rr? reiH?, C.crror..Cy.N.,r I ' ??'nUCi? • .t.?ICI n/'Cw..+'S'+??0 ?7?1 J-cr.`.o Ja? ?ro. ' ? a:. I -?? luA7?au?s+xi. +ri _..r. u ? _. ,? - s1. f?/ ?•T" d cq O ?.uI.X .. ? .. \ ._ . 7, ?1 ? 1 y W s3 ? .1' of+^°.iNS'fP -/S?^f/1f3.{?' i '? r of Y^l g 1 . t /r IJ Ww.w'fY ?' c-J`O.s.1Cr` WJ,J` nlt?l? YM' Wf I / ? I 2 Sfa`Nr i "t_ ie ^- ?j'?a/`..? '? '???- PT_c aPvswc -. la oL? // r I (! J spa V ?N??/h. ? ?O ti6?,? ? Al c - If^'. Cai i 1 G ? - Glµ?.?+?1wp (Pl .'r ?l,Jv01` I.:: ", "' 11 _•, n M `' S M•.f,.il'r}?;.r/, q me / (? (/ Cl W;M"bMye,?, :c.ryo?vl e?.,..va; . ?aG?CljrlL t = J4 4 !? !sf ' ? -T' I k i ` ? a I : vgnwlt? POP, - 4, . . S ' - - Y got.,. ?fr< F r L 157aE ?i?/v6ES' .1977 .. C- [.AhC ?C ?G `,, 9V, d' /Yo . /YAM E CoNr r p. TES/AL " D Z W BA/?LOW k/ m C ,,pp A K/N O:. Pf rt L ? W , GU _ p S / - 0,7 eor Taw e? o -' p8 w. QvEErf S" t 3 ,. o y 4e.) y ,s. a / O cv 1) o? A wr + He ? '? } / 2 w /y/} PG r' C yu2r T LiyrL,r QwLarva %G E ' ' c -S 7 ;0 q•YAC. ,I rfae ? /yt eAAI?o.FO OyEkCRorua?° Al Tckdo OaA • L/ rrte. Qucc c,- .ver W C ` E 24 OGO L. vGEn( LoNa K 5 rya ?.nm ; z3E Lwas.K LOy?°.m R Y a P v ' 24,E. /POC tY .QRCO.?G _. , ! .. yt/?r r (/.?cr ? 14 y? ? f :1?: t tt a?ppp 78.00+ '.. - 78.00v 0.00 78.00+ 17.00+ 87.00+ - 45.00+ 67.00+ 83.00+ 71.00+ 626.00+ 28•U0+ 81.00+ 74.00+ - 81.00+ 67.00+ 33.00+ 27.00+ 64.00+ 25.00+ 670.00+ 96.00+ 27.00+ 59.00+ 112.00+ 81.00+ ' 47.00+ 27.00+ 61•U0+ . 70.00+ ,. 30.00+ 7.834. uo* i 4? 7o / C ... Y.+rr... s I - r I -- ___.- iYiyenS 2 ? - i 7 All. ' 2 gsQ? ` 3 s e a ? o? July 15, 1977 P i " County Road Administration Board 6,730 Martini?ay" Olympic,. Washington 95504 Attn. Ernie Geissler,. Admin. Fn,-r. t?S?+ Dear .Ernie:., s This is to certify that County Brid^,e Inspection has been accomplished as rep{uired - by Chapter 20 of the CRAP, Standards of C,ood Practice. Enclosed please find a copy of the report filed with the Board of. County Commissioners on May 23;3977. Acopy of - - this .was sent to your office prior to June 1, 1977. ?. Abso enclosed is a copy of the adopted 1978-83 road Construction Program together,` with the adopting resolution. Very truly yours, ' k. Edwin A. Becker, Director Department of Public Works y? MI :A F3: al l 4 i ?f _nc orurea (2) _ 4n - x vz H W E- n UW z E 33 W El III E- En Ul ,214z oaH as o U- N y O O H 1 w a3 h z I ,7z. x a H a aE V)W g axz H W > r4 0 a W C 7 O y ?; W H i. W n ? C7 N tr ',rtt H r ? y m ,<.?71 ) M1 u? ?•' ?9h y '? Q 0 ? a>Y ? il ?k,' ? . Y z a z F +) G a O 04 a a) { "x0 4 m m y r w ax o ro w ri -a U o a a U1 M N U4 , W 0 '+ s O.s4 a) v s Go(D M0aj U) N N tT U U (T° O - a) a) O •.1 LI fi ty?. N N N m r x }- ? x x x x x x x I 1• CD C. C) N N N N N N N M N N 1f) M co V' O r - 4 N rl N M ,-1 r•' (? tD co O O O M N '? C tf) r V' O ID m O ; N rl c• ri C N .-i N r+p'+(, + } `t'.. C) CD m a CD rn D, r ID V' O N lD ': M N Ln v V' M V' r ? 4l 10 1 a) 11 4J U 1 N H w U) w to w N N N a) V d) U) (d u• to 0 aJ al a) N, a) a) u U (!) U H C c 01 C N G m r O. G W O, r. u r. a) 0 G N W iC I •rl •11 •.1 u •,1 O •H 0 •.i O V) O U O A. W H u E U ) NX 4J .14 41 k MOW 4 E 1) O N U •N V) U (n U (1 U G U N G N G U) G U) i•I N 41 V) O '.1 In ro •H a O tT O t1+ Sa ro U G G ?A t} ON a) m a) m A N O w O O O .u O d) O i) O 11 F U a) a O 11 11 rl u a N V) u rl N ?l u7 ti7 N () u .G 1 J 'F! b t , ro u a u U) m v m ro ro ' u 41 11 N N 0-4 u .+ Y1 -4 IU a " (ts t4 0 m E ,Q) H AN E N ri Uq1 rl U) -1 0 G O (1 C 14 11' N U ro 11 Q? E F H E F E H ? 8 PC Rro1 'W a) 4J U G W".W . I ? •./ •,i rl •.I •.1 I •rl a1 X Wrl r? _ 4 4? ?nF •a E a E„a E w H w E ,a E w v ?D •n ?D ?D ?D N O .-i .1 .i .1 N N N N N N H G 4rt? W a) 0 ty, Hsi 4J d) atv -4$4 0) a) (U uv 3 v m> '4. a ad ma) va 'irod roa, 2' co z H q N O N ri N O u O N 7 C) C. U U x a U Q U a u F U d a ? fY f +.? 1?}s i7 'ILL I law If v T va ? , t. ci t j ? . 4 1976 BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT Board of Jefferson County Commissioners " .? Gentlemen: The 1976 bridge inspection' has been completed on the 27 bridges on the Jefferson ` County road_system. No significant changes have occured since the 1975 rating, a _! J was made so the 1976 load rating remains the same. 1 Minor repairs have been recommended' for the following bridges: g No. 4W ,- Hell Roaring. Creek - Paint hand railing, remove debris from pZ bent. - No. 8W - Quests River - Contract removal debris center pier, Epoxy-Conc. repair - og joint spelling - high pressure water cleaning of bearing seats. ' He. 16E -'. Little.Quilcene River - Paint quard rail and hand rails. No. 18E - Portage Cana* - Patch pavement at bridge ends, repair timber fender ! t protection on north side of west pier, replace rock crib"fonder end. No. ZZE - Old Linger Longer - Clean bearing and expansion seats, replace wheel curb, tighten loose nuts. (Plans were to remove this bridge which t "a been replaced by new structure - bridge No. 23E - Linger Longer). i - l No. 27W- W lloughby Replace wood railing poste with gals. steel railing i poste, replace flax-beam and paint. ( The following bridges are scheduled for replacement in 1976: ; V 02W - Barbow - Pre-fabricated wood structure - 1120-S16 rating. 09W - Hemphill Creek - Prefabricated wood structure - H20-S16 rating. - - , c 25E Myers Pre-fabricated wood structure - 1120-916 rating. The 6 year road plan will include the replacement of bridge No. 20E - Jackson Creak - Which is a 1958 constructed log structure. Thera are no load restrictions La' now; but the creek bed has gradually filled in to the point that additional clear- ance is needed. N. r Hinoredeficiancies in delineators and advisory signing will be corrected. - ' Inspection eheats for each bridge are available for review if you deals. C.C. CRAB t I , p n p7 ?'h, t'ri. A ...?•:a "?'W'.1Ytt : (`' .!?°•;r?f ?. v, lkratY .1. `Y,R. 4' 7 7 :1 kF +•. ? ?p??p1yS???. ?s?a ' .1r vG„ t - .._.. :... ...........dom.. i- 3 u:...?..._.:.......:..IS:i....:tiu:vui uiiSrS{'y+i:'... -..?:?,k . E k . ? ? e E July 11, 1975 F Jefferson County Commiscionere ort P Townsend# Washington 98368 Res 1975 Bridge inspection & a Rating Report Gentlemens The attached report is a summary of the 1975 bridge inspection and r rating. This share that the Mayers Bridge No. 12 needs to be'replaced in 1976 and the Hemphill Creek Bridge should be replaced if financial Feasible. Very truly yours, Edwin A. Decker, Diroctor rs Department of Public Works M:mk Enca. CCt CRAB u ? y y? 37 t uiW ' 1 VN w n7 M ? '?? ?: ?, ?f?f"? iF :'??? " '. L y ? ?_ ? ' ' ?: y ? k RNdi.h? ?--B _ C ?.•..` ,?• .as.. ..? m¢ ?. . 1975 BRIDGE INSPECTION AND RATING REPORT 1. Fletcher Creek Bridge on Quinault Road - Precast, prestressed concrete bridge E t ` with cast-in-place concrete piles, concrete caps and diaphrams, Designed by ABAI Engineering constructed by Dulin Construction Co in 1974 i D rt , . . es gn H-20 S-16. Bridge condition excellent. 2. Unknown Creek on Quinault Road - This bridge has been replaced using 60 inch diameter metal culvert. The bridge provided for river overflow which was unnecessary. Culvert in new condition.. s, 3• Anderson Creek Bridge on Oil City Road - Precast, prestressed concrete bridge. Design by ABAi Engineers. Constructed by Owens Bros. in 1974, Design H-20-S16. Bridge in excellent condition. 4. Hell Roaring Creek on Upper Hoh Road -Built by County crew in 1958 under CRP 176 0 $2,500.00. This is a wood structure with treated fir piling. Bridge is _ in good condition. Rating HS 20. , t 5•. Alder Creek Bridge on the Upper Hoh - Prestressed concrete bridge built in 1972. Bridge and appurtenances are in excellent condition. Rating HS 20. Scheduled p for asphalt concrete overlay in 1975. t x; 6. Rock Creek Bridge on the Upper Hoh Road -prestressed concrete bridge built in 1972. Scheduled for asphaltic concrete overlay in 1975• Structurally the bridge is in excellent condition. Rating HS 20. 7. Tower Creek Bridge on the Upper Yoh Road - Prestressed concrete bridge built in A 1973-74. Deck is uneven and is scheduled for asphalt concrete overlay in 1975. Y Structure and stream bed in excellent condition. Rating HS 20. E " 8. Queets Bridge on the Clearwater Road - This overhead steel truss was built in 1931 by the State Highway Department on an H-10 two-way design. Prestress approach spans have been constructed each end and are in good condition. This d o- bridge has been structurally well maintained and is in good condition. One way t ?' _ HS 20 loadings cause some overloading; however, this is causing no distress. This bridge is substandard in width but structurally serviceable at this time. 'Or 9• Hemphill Creek Bridge on the South Bogachiel Road is a 111' wide wooden structure with one-way traffic. Low volume road with only occassional 20 ton loads. Bridge is servicable with H 20 rating. This substandard bridge should be replaced as n funds become available. x_ 10. Dowans Creek Bridge on the South Bogachiel Road is a prestressed concrete bridge constructed in 1974 on an HS..20 design. Bridge deck is uneven and is scheduled for asphalt concrete overlay in 1975. 3ridge and stream bed are in excellent 4 i condition. 11, 31ack Point - This bridge was replaced in late 1971+ using a 6o inch concrete r culvert which in in good condition. No bridge. d .. ? ?6'.?.W&f - ? .ro=6'?IA41r, _rd.• 1 1 r-+Jt r° r,. i t V5 r ?luf? .v`v`N.iC31?,.17.} .v,?p? x`M.?rr•?, l M. s 1 t c , i + r t curb ?d?? {N C' t+ ','?< v, -i t j $K 5? r y? ?wI 1ti1?? F71 - 33 4 ? 1 ,? 4 1 a 12, Meyers Bridge This is a substandard wooden bridge. It is narrow and is 1 - structurally unsound. Timber construction gives this structure great , flexibility. However, I feel that this flexibility may prove to be a > .' disaster. The rating of this bridge is a questionable 11 3. It is recommended ? f that this bridge be replaced in 1976. f 13. Jackson Creek Bridge located at North Gate at the foot of Walker Mountain is a ? c> cedar log stringer ballast deck and is in excellent structural condition with an H 20 rating. The stream has deposited a large amount of gravel under the ti thi t s me. e at structure, however, the. clearance is adequa y - 111. Chimacum Creek Bridge (School) - This Luten Truss concrete arch built in 1915 „ on an unknown design and widened in 1953 on an H 15 design and is regularly carrying if 20 loadings with no distress whatsoever. Rating is H 20 by experience. 15. Chimacum Creek (Hunt) -This cast-in-place concrete bridge built in 1971 is in excellent condition. Rating H 20 S 16. 16. Little Quilcene River Bridge on County Road 18 -This precast concrete structure ti 20 i ra ng. th an H built in 1955 is in excellent condition w s 17. Chimacum Creek Bridge (Yarr) - This precast concrete bridge built in 1955 is in good condition. Rating is ?i20. ` 18. Portage Canal Bridge -This steel box girder, reinforced concrete bridge built ? in 1951 is, in good condition, Rating is H 20. 19. Port Townsend Railroad Overcrossing - This structure built in 1953 on an H 15 design is structurally good. It appears to have been built on a poor vertical grade. The overloading caused by impact should be reduced by stripping off the P ' existing asphalt covering and replacing with an asphaltic concrete overlay on " a better vertical alignment. Rating is H 15• Impact loading causes an over- y t' load condition. e 20, Hurst Creek Bridge on the Clearwater Road is a prestressed concrete built in 4 r? 1969 and is structurally fine. Pavement seats are cracking and should be excavated for further inspection. Rating H 20. 4a D a. 21. Little Quilcene River Bridge (Ropers St.) - This old concrete, earth filled wa arch bridge was built around the turn of the century and no records are avail- able. This bridge serves local traffic of a very minor nature. It is planned a to place a 5-ton load limit on this bridge. Rating 5-ton serviceable. 22. Big Quilcene River Bridge (Old Lingerlonger) - Steel Truss Arch bridge originally c i built in the mid 1920's. This bridge has been relieved of all but local traffic which also has another route oy using new bridge r1o. 23. This bridge will need Q painting coon. It is structu'rally round at this time. However, to reduce expenditure, this bridge should be removed. f ® 23. Big O.uilcene River grid e (::ew Lingerlonger) - This prestressed concrete bridge ° tiw was built in 1969 with the Latent to replace bridge No. 22. Structure in in , { excellent condition. Rating H 20, 1 f ` f ?. n .Gf'r "7 , 1 ?1 R r J 1 tf 1?? i f?u ? (1 1 t t 1 { f !:1 ? ? ? r r ?b , .. ddtL"uI._'^`v?'-_?.?..-d.,.. ?+3.. _?_?SV -a...o. ? - bran _ -• 1 A._,..k 21F. Willouby Creek Bridge on the Upper Hoh Road - This prestressed concrete bridge built in 1,061 is structurally in good condition. Need new guard rail posts. Rating H 20. 25• Rueets Bridge on Kelly Road on queets River is under Olympic National Park jurisdiction. 26. Lake Le?a.nd Bridge - This bridge has been removed. 27. Rocky Brook Bridge on the Dosewallips road is a prestrssed concrete bridge built in .1964. Bridge is in•good condition. Rating is H 20. g, 28. West Uncas Bridge across_ Snow Creek near Discovery Bay is a reinforced concrete structure built in 1963 and is in good condition. Rating is H 20. '' 29. Owl Creek Bridge on the South Hoh Road is a treated timber-log bridge in.good condition built in 1973• Rating is H 16. -WIN 30. Barlow Ranch Bridge on the Lower Hoh road is a one-way timber bridge in good condition and is serving local traffic plus an occassional H 20 loading. Rating H 16 but is substandard in width. 31. Maple Creek Bridge on the Maple Creek Road South of the ifoh River is a pre- stressed concrete bridge built in 1973 and is in excellent condition. Rating is H 20. 1501 a E N e? V ii7Pt5 ?'. s ?u r 1973 BRIDGE CONDITION :z RATING REPORT October 1973 1, FLETCHER CREEK BRIDGE, on Quinault Road. Old bridge is extremely narrow,. _ 12' wide with a rating of II-12. Programmed for replacement during 19'73 - and early 1974 with prestressed concrete H-20 5-16 design. Contractor- Lee Dulin. - r 2. UNKNOWN CREEK, on Quinault Road, Old bridge is extremely narrow - 12'4" with a load. rating of H-12. Programmed for replacement during 1973 or early 1974. Replacement will be 72" diameter steel culvert. - >r - 3, ANDERSON CREEK BRIDGE, on Oil City Road. Present bridge is unstable. - Bridge for replacement is under contract with Owens Bros. Replacement is °.' prestressed concrete. Rating will be H-20. - y? 4. HELL ROARING CREEK BRIDGE, on Upper Hoh Road. Bridge looks inadequate from the top, this is because of the one element hand rail. Structurally ,a the bridge is sound and well designed. Built during the 1940's. Rating - H-20. .a .'} 5.. ALDER CREEK BRIDGE, on the Upper Hoh Road. New prestressed concrete bridge YV4 built in 1972. Bridge is in new condition. Rating H-20. 6. ROCK CREEK BRIDGE, on the Upper Hoh Road. New prestressed concrete bridge r,.. built in 1972. Bridge is in new condition. Rating is H-20. - - 7. TOWER CREEK BRIDGE, on the Upper Hoh Road. This bridge is being replaced at this date 'with prestressed concrete, with a rating of H-20. ' 8. QUEETS BRIDGE, on the Clearwater Road. This bridge has been completely JJ ' structurally repaired and painted (2 Contracts) during early summer 1973., This steel truss bridge was built in 1930-31 to an H-10 two way design. The traffic is limited to one way at this time. North and South wooden approaches aca have been replaced with prestressed concrete and are in good condition. A steel height barrier has been constructed, on the north approach to lessen yW r damage to overhead truss members caused by overheight loads. Even though this bridge is carrying some overloads, the structure is in good condition and 3s serviceable. 9• HEMPHILL CREEK BRIDGE, on the South Bogachiel road is a 14' wide bridge with one way running planks. Very low traffic volume road with only occassional heavy loads.' Structurally this bridge is good with a rating of H-21. This 1 L narrow bridge should be replaced as funds become available, r 10. DOWNS CREEK BRIDGE, on the South Bogachiel Road is a one way log bridge with ?'. L. a ballast deck. The abutments are log and are extremely unstable. This - instability is aggravated by the meandering stream on an unstable streambed. Repairs necessary to keep this bridge open during the past year have been G high in cost. Rating H-19.8, however, the abutments could erode causing bridge collapse. Recommend replacement 19'74. 0 -71 Y' ZaW s 11. BLACK POINT BRIDGE, on the Black Point Road, is substandard in both width and capacity. The caps are rapidly deteriorating. Bridge rating is H-4. r. Occassional overloads are experienced by fuel trucks servicing the resident- ial area in the Black Point Beach area. It is anticipated that the access § road beyond this bridge will need to be upgraded to meet the demand of in- _,w ? creased traffic. It is recommended that this bridge be replaced during the - 1974 construction season. 12.. MEYERS BRIDGE. This is a substandard bridge in both width and. rating. This b bridge serves on a farm access road and occassional overloads are experienced. " The bridge is doing a serviceable job at this time and it appears capable of serving for some time to come. Rating H-3. 13. JACKSON CREEK BRIDGE. This log stringer-ballast deck bridge is in excellent physical condition with an H-20 rating. Low stream bed clearance approxim- ately 3 feet. Clearance is satisfactory at this time. - 14. CHIMACUM CREEK BRIDGE (School) This Luten Truss Monolithic Concrete Bridge was built in 1915 and widened in 1953 on an H-15 design. This bridge is I S - regularly carrying legal H-20 S16 loadings and shows no distress whatsoever. - ..?, Rating 11-20 by experience. t ? + 15. CHIMACUM CREEK BRIDGE (Hunts) This cast-in-place reinforced concrete bridge 7 was built in 1971. Designed on an H-20 S-16 rating. Bridge is. in excellent p condition. -, 16. LITTLE QUILCENE RIVER BRIDGE - This precast T-Beam reinforced concrete bridge was built in 1955 on an HS-20 design. Approach guard rails were constructed in 1972. This bridge is carrying legal H-20 loadings at this time with no 9 , distress. - W. CHIMACUM CREEK BRIDGE (Yarr) This precast concrete bridge was built in 1955, ay South Endwall was repaired in 1965. Deck, abutments and railing is in excel- lent condition. Rating is HS-20. $ 18. PORTAGE CANAL BRIDGE - This steel box girder-reinforced concrete bridge was constructed in 1951 on an H-20 design. This bridge was painted in 1973. Bridge is in excellent condition. Rating 11-20. q 19. PORT TOWNSEND RAILROAD OVERCROSSING - This treated timber structure was built z? in 1953 on an H-15 design. Both end sills appear to be in distress and show 4 settlement. Main structural members are substantially as built. End sills and pavement seats need major maintenance in 1974. Rating H-15• 20. HURST CREEK BRIDGE on Clearwater road built 1969 on a design of H-20 S16. " ,? This prestressed . concrete T-Beam structure is leaking at the north pavement s?` . ,i seat and shows some cracking, however, this does not affect its structural . p ' value at this time. Wtl t ? + l 21. LITTLE QUILCENE RIVER BRIDGE (Rogers St.) This, old concrete arch bridge was h`' Aye i , built around the turn of the century. No records are available. This bridge % y a „ d f ? ru 1' f _ serves only occassional local traffic of very minor nature. This bridge, is «y in fair condition, being limited to one way traffic by virtureof its narrow width. This bridge is adequate and is serving its need well. 22. BIG QUILCENE RIVER BRIDGE (Old Lingerlonger) This steel truss bridge was built - ; s sometime during the mid 1920's. This bridge was moved in 1953 approximately 30' downstream to its present location. Bridge 23 was built in 1969 to remove truck traffic from this structure. At this time, the traffic is only light local traffic. - 23. BIG QUILCENERIVER BRIDGE (New Lingerlonger) This prestressed concrete bridge. ,,,, `" built in 1969 with a design of H-20 S-16. All structure elements are in was 1 excellent condition. Rating H-20. € 1 _, 24. WILLOUGHBY CREEK BRIDGE on the Upper Hoh Road. This prestressed concrete bridge . _ was constructed in 1961 to an H-20design. . Floods have periodically damaged 5 approaches. The bridge is substantially as built- H-20. . ;y 25• QUEETS.BRIDGE on Kelly Ranch road - This bridge is under Olympic National Park. ris ti i c ju d on. `26. LAKE LELAND BRIDGE. This bridge has many badly deteriorated members. This bridge is not open to auto traffic and is used by fisherman. Unstable guard rails cause this structure to be unsafe for this purpose. It is recommended ' that this structure be removed as soon as possible. 4, 27. ROCKY ;BROOK CREEK BRIDGE on the Dosewallips road was built in 1964 on an H-20 S16 design using prestressed concrete. Bridge is in excellent condition, H-20 rating. [? , 28.'UNCAS BRIDGE across Snow Creek on the West Uncas road was constructed ofre-- inforced concrete in 1963. Design was H-20 and is in excellent condition. +n 29• OWL CREEK BRIDGE on the South Hoh-Owl Creek road is a timber structure built h" in, 1973 using hand treated timber. Rating is 11-16. 06, 47/ CC _ Edwin A. Becker, Director f P blic Works t D t `s{ t- men o u epar +E i v? l ?? try Fv E v? ?C3r??ac7E RA-rlr.cE? 5 uev y IR?3,' I FLe TCt4 Cx'FS K ,(Q?" a) P2oc,e4,,,t w5'm ;._ {t°ePl fic? ,r ;lay 3; 11e z ??NYr.louJ'u CK,: CcJu,rL..v.fr'-? pROCk.4I ::..ice 4=e< .?EFL,rtc?:ra- ( tl?T t 1r714 p,$/'?.SOh.IIC?.. ?¢ 4- ?lur1L IQ6Y ?N ?7. C14?, ) S - 20 Wcoo P,LE, ST?tl,m--P-c '. 14Y8' _. p?F ;N .?, 1 n nn ^^ `.. ,C-`. LUCIL.: ` 2.Q PeES•T Zb() OIJCGL TE 1AlZ L ? `a Co (2o?c?j_CeEEl- 'C1-4on )' ? crc- lGj l-F;S:-zo Pkcrleeis Co?ct . . :''r 1,1• ?0.?-?L.?,6Q ?.CR•EEK:. ?!-?ah? (??C?.f/1i11Ma'h. ;YaC ?vPL.?3c&-/Yl E"NT? 1-I 7.°< E B' Qu t_. e'CS :B2,.P tz (N7. t--1' L"1 ONC' r,?A-! R.EP?IF C?dreR<.1 197' / ?a 9• NLMPI=11(..L.Cti°..• AJ°?ai?acfic,rr?? NQ ?--1 '2-'V LlcL-q3 1,lyd-rL.l7i'a,, w ?'•G'r4'flf? ,?. LO tw(; 1 CrP. ', C.?3arla cl? l¢'!) t-1: 7-0..; Lod: /3Q. -St-louLa 'Fn , Tpc, c-TH Fe- , 11 .. 'ri L'JtcK 19T r3P.. k-4 : 4' SERU1rGq-fSLa 3EN-ra+ Au_o;»? , .,y iY? nm; WWI - ?Aarri,Qcc S,ceu c? 12. V?lP{?S EIQ,b, I?"? R. ©: l-I : Cc' O - a', 13.J44't""d Ce. "CXfnra.r<<) \ 5 0 LoG ffe Irt C- crL(5N1 G?orTo? t(; 4 SCJ-e I ?. 04\L 4c n ?. ? 1-a 1S CDNCe{>lc r3KI IN Eu., I.LE T C,!, 7of.. ,.3 „ I.S. CN 1rn/icvlrn C,e lQZ1 r-t .2v" c.n-sT: ?u FCx,cr, couceoce 1 /G. L,.LJTrqu,Lc,;*Lla ?2d 18) '. I t-i-S'lo C,o,J?c,c-TC k11511.1 ?AKI ?R• C?.,1.n?ti4. n+ Cr. •L'L, Cor1 cA S•T C- L4'$? { j 1 PakT4-W E' CAa/aL :.. - H 20.', Cwo ;Couul TiciV N,'/4T l 1 R• Ova?C?v syl ?y <2 c rJo. 3a) ' 1-1 i5 S lz lv L &c)s M1w4 R? IY?rA? LA5?- _ ? ?H ' 20.,.1..??R"s•L ?,C.,e :'CGlrear.?.?,e?w: ,2d ? - ? t-N 20 S tG E'S7,P.L-'S.? Co,ele..; t46q ? ;. 21• LI T T LE;.. QU1 Lcb-le (Otd) wgpOic-' Ccfticec-Tc. Al4c-/45o,eu Ltf1/iLL? Lnc-L; TP -?2,j(3LG (LA,IcFJd COLD) STEEL Necla' -lOoO Ca/plrro?';-Lac?LT?uFg". Z (°?LC qu,LG1=J-; ,(,-iJL-7Ld) j ? ? Zo PR c9-r c- yS rO?lr L Zt1.,:\d:LLau:t4w? 14PG'E?1P,?o->Seo ?,iuv;rc- i96 f .. x _ ? L.Iw.hI 0 2•5 il_./L LC C]4'T 01=. 'S L'Q?t ICC :.'rlS l?'lu4 ONLY. ):. 1 - 2Ce•?.etxl? BPwiC 1J e, CCo?e WAL[, P'a) , A-i ?, Z..o PKC-.-rPe-.?6:? cu?eret re? 1P1.G4 .1 ib.. IiSI 4 I .'. 1.'•l. W?>t'. UtIGF'> ?SR, CS,JO •?CR? 1-i '?, ']-v Ci,ST I,r;RLE1G9" Co NC2E T6 I ClG ?1-, ; ?' 26 ©w L. CC, ?b o v ?? .l-1 o h) ?T woou Dcr.C o, LoFS Slams Lq 4 C/6vCCI ?.J l fin, ,ti + P,Qc?t,+,rl•t AKt GglRyl u4 OCCNOr, o,vN 1 l OV 6,[L04 j I F ?? " I ? I i ? I a ? b ' lo I?•8 a ? R7 f3LALk- PclJT RRIaGti - l o o I Lis r?3lt. , ;f7WLC I I y? ' I r S ? , y r nipl+^,? 'k,F1AAM'67Y0"'.ii/1+'.' 1 I 6 L 1 " t .-5 ' r ??? J Jti} -?G? ,l" ?4?h?? 763 e?.?. ?? ?,. .. -. "??a: G5 1a?.. cif.? . ?.,.dwu? N''?Q$F!R' S 1 I?? i r f, f.ai,,???u `> t?Jy'?. ,?, iP Nwy;pw4aNr:?; h?- yarn ?r, i?in`h i ?, ..?,n ti s?{e? iyk t?4 ?., h ,:WT 31 YES 2 NO 2. Is there a need to develop Standard Bridge Systems which can be used by Washington County Eng ineers? 29 YES 3 NO If Standards were 3 to be developed, what type of superstructure n one ) th . construction . a should be designed? (You may indicate more PRIORITY YES 1.38 29 PRE-STRESSED CONCRETE DECK GIRDERS 2.32 22 PRE-STRESSED CONCRETE WITH CAST-IN-PLACE DECK 2.96 16 CAST-IN-PLACE SLAB BRIDGES . 3.09 LO STEEL I GIRDERS WITH PRE-CAST DECK f 4.96 8 STEEL I GIRDERS WITH CAST-IN-PLACE DECK 3.86 11 TIMBER GLULAM GIRDERS WITH TIMBER DECK 6.67 3 TIMBER GLULAM GIRDERS WITH CONCRETE DECK *P.S. P.C. SLAB W/ 3T & 4T 8 OTHER !LONG SPAN k BOX CULVERTS !lwP.S. CONCRETE SLAB. !EXTRUDED SLAB *P.C. BOX GIRDER, *SUPERSPAN CULVERTS ndards? St 4. What type of a substructure construction should be developed as a,. ., YES 30 ABUTMENT WALL TYPE PIERS 12 SPILL THROUGH OR PERCHED ABUTMENTS RECE1VF7 NOV 2 4 1c; JEFFERSON C0tINTY ENGINEEk iJt?:=i Cis 4 f 10. What superstructure type or types do you currentl rely most heav4ly upon for spans ranging from 20' to 110'? PRIORITY YES 1.34 28 PRE-STRESSED CONCRETE DECK GIRDERS 1.94 20 PRE-STRESSED CONCRETE WITH CAST-114-PLACE DECK 3.00 10 CAST-IN-PLACE SLAB EPIDGES --- --- STEEL I GIRDERS WITH PRE-CAST DECK 3.75 5 STEEL I GIRDERS WITH CAST-IN-PLACE DECK. 3.50 4 TIMBER GLULAM GIRDERS WITH TIMBER DECK --- --- TIMBER GLULAM GIRDERS WITH CONCRETE DECK -P.C. SLAB, *TIMBER GIRDER AiyD DECK -- -7 OTHER, **P.S. SLAB DECO *EXTdUDED SLA3 *SPA+ i)EJ i, *S11P;;R3PAY CULVERPS 11. Do you perceiv e a need for alternates to the primary types listed in (3)? 12 YES 18 NO 12. Comments: SEE ATTACHED SUMMARY Please return this questionnaire to: Dr. Harold C. Sorensen Structures Section Dept. of Civil A Environmental Engineering Washington State University Pullman, WA 99154-2914 TNAN? 'r'?1^ r r yy P wghi,l WYtiM1'mkwy+ c r r Y e' <r , ?rvl? :l ?""` ........ wpw tirR4tltlfpplJ? W h r k i 1 xW'3lylty W? 1 .? ?4 ' P 7 ?" J oJ?i ? 't r r r 4: t'.7, fl Y 'w „777 gr ly N ?` ? I t 4 5 r ? /_. 1 .V' . .' ; ?l l -'1[ t ,r'p? ? +k$ ?41 ? ? 1 )1?Y ! } ? J 1 rFl _mc hY 1'11 1y r ??. } ', s . z ya } 1?,! ,? H I ? SUMMARY OF SURVEY COMMENTS 1. I think any designs for this purpose should be for utilitarian structures without the flossy detail of some state bridges. Attention should be given to ease of building from a contractors standpoint. (21) 2. Standards should include bridge rail and approach rail systems.(38) 3. Excellent idea--could also use information on major culvert installations/design. (1) 4. Short span "cookbook" designs are already done.(Rib deck, Tri deck, Span deck) Let's don't reinvent the wheel.(4) 5. Douglas county has not needed to replace any of its bridges for several years.(9) 6. Refer to local agency guidelines for roadway width standards. Interested in more info on Glulam.(11) ., 7. Our county uses W.S.D.O.T. Std. bridge plans for prestressed girders and slabs, along with W. S. D. O. T. std. plans and specs. We do not see the need for obtaining additional plans at this time. (14) 8. The 10-20' structures are also important even though they are not technically classed as bridges.(19) 9. In 1968 we contracted with a•consultant design standards for length of bridges most common to our area. All but three bridges np - built have used these standard designs. We think this method has y' saved considerable money. (28) 10. Re: Quest.ll Not in type necessarily, but units designed in much a way that installation time is shortened. For bridge replacements the public lutes to see n bridge clamed for very long. (9) 11. To many variables affecting bridge type selection to answer r r #3 and #10 with any credibility.(26) 3b 12. Design loading should be greater than HS20. Provide for protection from stream erosion. Foundation design should consider retaining embankments for bridges high over the stream.(5) • Y 13. 1) Are your aware that W.S.D.O.T. has some pretty good voided " " slab standards--but one local consultant prefers a double T because of the economy of material and less D.L. for erection. ' r 2) We have had two bridges where the contractor had the option bidd 4r !i of ing precast or cast-in-place and both cases the cast-in- place option was low bid, Guess the contractor can make more money without buying precast. We are sure there are limits to this. (33) 9 : 03./70 yr ons. AdMIL Washington State Barents n Department of Transportation Duane Secretary of of Transportation Trans § 'ILI ' Transportation Building KF•01 Olympia, Washington 98504.5201 206 753.6005 June 27, 1986 All Cities and Counties in Idaho and Washington RTAP Course 86-8 C :a Workshop on Rehabilitation of € Existing Bridges e The Northwest Technology Transfer Center will present the referenced three- day workshop if there is sufficient interest generated by this announcement. Dates and locations will be defined later. The workshop is offered by the Federal Highway Administration through the National Highway Institute and the Office of Engineering. FOR WHOM DESIGNED: This course is designed for officials or employees of local government units--towns, cities, or counties--who are responsible This course is predicated on the id f b r ges. for the care and upkeep o assumption that participants have considerable experience and background es am ve y mo a in public works maintenance and operations, but re There is, however, sufficient material nce concerning bridges i f . exper e o contained in the course so that anyone even fairly knowledgeable in the field of bridge rehabilitation and repair can gain a substantial amount F of useful information. The course is aimed primarily at short-span bridges on local roads. It focuses on methods to extend the service life or increase the load and i ' future traffic carrying capacity without full-scale replacement. r DESCRIPTION: At the three-day workshop, each of the characteristics shown below will be discussed: Bridge types, sizes, materials and ages; Deterioration mechanisms, fatigue, and accident damage; Cl;mate and environmental factors; Rehabilitation activities, methods, and procedures; and Maintenance activities, methods, and procedures. OBJECTIVES: The main course objectives are to demonstrate how to develop cost-effective schemes for bridge rehabilitation projects and to provide t information, guidelines, and tools for making cost-effective decisions regarding these projects. The ability to ascertain whether or not there is a need for outside professional assistance when undertaking these projects is also emphasized. \!ED p+EI ? V REVV . JUPI S O 1986 ,x r JEF:'FRSON COUNTY ENGINEERS OFFICE ounts P d t ti l l ,kr, y e 1 ! U r Wt J d I 1 25 J T J ?1 GENTLEMEN: WE ARE SENDING YOU 5D Attached ? Under separate cover via the following items:' ? Shop drawings ? Prints ? Plans ? Samples ? Specifications .": ? Copy of letter ? Change order ? .,?, o COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION 1 A p, 198 Long Time observation of a Fatigue Damaged Bridge 1 18-20 "ay 1983 Fatigue Strength and Repair of Full Size Cover-Plated Beams ER i6 's syf,i THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: lk 11 ? For approval ? Approved as submitted ? Resubmit copies for approval y hF, _76rt1 '` N For your use ? Approved as noted ? Submit_coples for distribution i - ? As requested ? Returned for corrections ? Return corrected prints 'r?• ? For review and comment ? r? 't ?t ? FOR BIDS DUE 19 ? PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US oZ 1 t ?.x% t REMARKS T rompAbfl?Lltnt.T t9]r1 you I would Bond a copy of some research on repair of ?at.1 20 crpclL .._L.Le.Sg M2nd the spocifiod welding procedure as the repair method for P u -tha-Bnrtnr? Bn? rnt.iT„n crack. Be sure pro ep r penetration is achieved. Grinding may } be required. Also enclosed is a copy of a previous fatigue study on the same bridgn.t I ` ? Alt,hou lEt cover plate welds are a common ].ovation for fatigue cracks, secondary ? f t+; ,? details such as those for the stiffening truss bar connnetion are also vulnerable. It. Yh is interesting to see how quickly fatigue cracks dovolopod in this bridge aftor the '. Ka. initial ones woro discovered. This bridge does have a high truck traffic use. Some 4§ ^ fati(suo cracks did develop through the weld as they did at Portagn canal, rather than at the tor> of the weld^_ f n ay COPY TO---_.-__________-.___ SIGNED: nra lV ,L, ?/{? 14fl .. l r 7,. .a?u e•o> ..w...•,,.......? r.,.n, w.,. o?..? a .n.lowr..... not .• nol.a. w?.orr noary .• • V _ ,:+ 1, 1;f! ? ? ? t I I?+ If r'? y i I ?„? y... +rrM f T +J.. y - l i i1 1 G.GSa d U,k ? r I J ? . Sfr 1 3 r 11,; ?,?V? 17 ?? ?._.-..:.?.?,.._!hmaall?B+'f-- -. a?? ,..'.. S.,-, ''•s # Y>aa4,tim? ?."i-?'' 1_v..,s?,,,??, i - I e< Metal Structures Conference, r Brisbane, 18-20 May 1983 Fatigue Strength and Repair of Full Size Cover-Plated IP K" Beams 2bA? 3? li J.W. FISHER K Professor of Civil Engineering, Associate Director, Fritz Engineering Laboratory LeHigh University, Bethlehem, USA ? H.HAUSAMMANN i, ?,. Research Associate, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Lausanne, Switzerland and A.W. PENSE Professor of Metallurgy and Materials Engineering, LeHigh University, Bethlehem, USA S? SUMMARY Test data for full size cover-plated beams show chat beams with flange thickness greater than 20 .aa have less fatigue resistance than the smaller sections used co develop specification design cri eerie. 4 A new, lover bound fatigue resistance (Stress Categgry E') was developed on the basis of teat result. and es time cos from n ma chematical model. _ Peening and gas tungsten arc remelt passes applied to fatigue damaged veld-toe regions can be used to - n appli- _ - retrofit weld reinforced beams. Both retrofitting methods were used in the field co verify tha cebiI ity to existing structures. Peening was found co be a reliable method for small cracks and was easier to execute in the laboratory and the field. The gas tungsten arc remelt process was capable of retrofitting slightly larger cracks, but was more difficult co control. Cracks that are deeper than 6 mm cannot be repaired by these two procedures. 1 INTRODUCTION Subsequent inspection of other cover plate ends in the same bridge revealed that two beams ad,{ncent to it was known from previous fatigue studies on steel the cracked member were also crocked through one- beams with welded cover plates that relatively half the flange thickness. Smaller fatigue cracks .i+large reductions in fatigue strength occur for were detected at several ocher cover plate ends. these details when the fatigue cracks initiate and 1°fW` grow from the small micro-sized discontinuities Stress measurement data on two If the Yellow Mill _ that exist a[ the veld Periphery (Fisher, at al.. Pond spans have ahawn that the peak stress range 1470 and 1974). The results of this work on the varied from 24.1 MPa to 47.6 MPn. The fatigue behavior of welded built-up details have been used (endurance) limit far cover-placed beams was de- -? y to define the fatigue strength over a wide range of rived from laboratory etudleA at 34.5 HPa (AASHTO design life, and this Information has been used to Category E). Because nearly all stress range excur- ?. develop specification provisions for weld-d details o3 ons were below this value, no fatigue cracking l.9 in the as-welded condlcons (Fisher, 1977). was exe<ted to occur. The forma trwn of cracks, { !,? however, pointed outthe need to examine the fatigue vl?uq a Fatigue cracking has been observed In the field at strength of full size members and methods for im- i a number of different structural Jata Iles Complete proving (upgrading) the fatigue strength of welded i fracture of a tens l on fl.nKa followed facigue crack 3o in to without changing the design detail. growth at the toe of a transversely welded covet plate In a 13 year old multiple beam bridge at Yellow T. verify the suitability of the two most promising Mill Pond, Bridgeport, Connecticut, as illustrated retrofitting methods, 16 full size cover-plated 1 , in Figure 1 (Bowers, 1973; Fisher, et .1., 1979). berme, identical in aize to msny heame at Yellow Mill Pond, were tested. They were tested to deter- K`n n „ mine the fatigue strength of full aize .a-welded ? y member. and to further assess the merit. of retro- 41 C -- y Litt Ing fatigue-damaged details by peening the veld i i 64$ toe or sPPl ying gee tungsten arc remelt to the fr i< crack. at the veld toe. Fatigue cracks in the laboratory, as well as In the ONE ; ""I, r" field, are difficult to repair. Of ton, welded re- ;?? pairs crack again after only A few years of service. Ropalrln0. thr crocked de '"I3 by bolting splice II .' plate. Across the cracked member co reduce the p stress intensity At the crack tit, and transfer the y;l stress around the cracked plate is a reliable but f 5..?.. i r 3 costly method of repair. The improvement methods selected for this study had d rd.?i 4y f ,.r been successfully applied by other Snveetign Care to n variety of details In thA ne-welded condition. t' i '.?l,, f {?Y,,t k gy, 'Y end fmprovemennts of 100 to 200 percent have been obsorved whe then- some do[n iln were. subjected to i r+%l?'t i p l rYClfc loo ding following application of these}'",{`? X144'% c r r tree[mentx (Nnrrlnon, 1966; Watklnsan,et a1.,1971; r.CSd .krlsrf! lj",, ?)1 t r "?` N l l l l n t o n n, 197]). Nwav-r, nn n[ud inn on fntf gux dAmn ged members -o know, sad it van desirable to Aft71 I ?It ^ extend the Applicability of thee. method. to these r el Rure 1 C k at Farf of Cover Plate 1970 d t 11x.qq??hWl r ? 1 t ,?•?•, n,r.." ',?.',?- _ , rt"f"""4"' .,,. ,?t^~'?'L•-""'?`i-"•.c_s? - ! 1 t 'r f j4, - ? fr:,r 7 rr ' r A i Mimi' S? •'??? N... ', '?• rs? .i? r,+. s-Y-___.. i1?^"'-fix ._. ._._.dv'F_. ?.1 - ,...: ?r.Ykv, X =; ?_? ,,. Th !fi '. full six I ms tested in chi Pr I t trn rolled w16 230, 116 and A588 ste 1 beams rho, )?9 I' were 6.04 m long and tasted on a four point loading. 'Cho ban's fnr1e 1P-- under ch grade Of steel were from the same heat. Tho sectluns were cut to length, and the 12 mm x 705 mm x 2.2136 m tt ;? cover places were welded to both flanges. 111a F. Rfrders were fabricated by a local fabricator, who a waa instructed to use normal bridge fabrication techniques and inspection r procedures. T. ? t The 11 mmflllet welds were placed along each side .I Of the cover plates and were made simultaneously by the automatic submerged arc process. The trans- ver fillet welds at the cover plate ends were r S1• made nanually by the gas metal arc process and v or, nw. w . continued around the cover plate end for a distance 0o about 25 mm to avoid leaving a crater at the c ver plate end. 2 TEST PROCEDURES AND RETROFITTING METHODS ?#f 1? ?j The cyclic load was applied with an Amsler, va ri- e r?k t able stroke hydraulic pulsator operated nc n an- stint frequency of 260 or 520 cycles per minute . The •'` tl (cam), depending on the stress range Plgnre 2 Pern (ng Tool •J loading i cycle was sinusoidal; the minimum applied ed stress + was always tensile. The flexural stress In the base metal of the tension flange at the end of the k cover place was used to control the experiments. All testing was carried out at room temperature t" e as between 15 C and 27 C. 7 1. FmAx.. Each beam was cycled until a crack was detected at T,. one end of the cover plate. The examination visE> made visually with 10X magnlflcc ion. When first }L •-@'- detected, the cracks were about 6 mm long. The• cracked detail was permitted co r - t grow until it was 25lms to 75 mm lung and was retrofitted by GTA re- r met welding or by peening, after which the test - s<q•f was continued. The crarkthat occurred of the ocher r. end of the cover plate was permitted to grow, sad' the fatigue resistance defined. The cracked section N was repaired after first cutting the damaged region Out of the beam for further study. Testing was ta sumed and continued unc L1 the beam failed or was ?? ^h 6 r-:p ) subjected to between 40 and 60 million +* - rt cycles. P 2.1 1'ecning 7 -' ryf' ?ti k'r Peening is an established method to obtain improved Performance. It has frequently been used in machine ,l al I r5 >JST?1 design and has been shown to he applicable for Lm- Fft;urn ) IvI d weld lac pravements on both small spocimens and beams On I d'nracory Spe,. lman t}t} ,, :'. (Harrison, 1966; grins, or al., 1969; watkinson, of „1t al.. 1971). In this study the weld toe was ecchan- _ lcalty air-hammer peened until It woo plastically -` - deformed. Thus, compress ivs residual stresses ware .,h rr+y `I r `f hF introduced, which prevented the full access range and base metal. 171t, "'• ? ' k from being effective In the vicinity of the veld Pr . t II c, r. ve the ,? } too. This influenced bath crack initiation and and ther`t-!1O Irv,,,•ne .,I ,rot the1 v.?Ll cue t Il EFt crack growth. nd r reduces the n,s •,rnc cacti „n,lltl m+: t ,t (Vntki neon, ,.c I 1171 H11Ilnt;[ 1) 71). wlu•n ( P A crack .,as p t I f l I. t ( I ,•t I l 1' ,lyr? A eening was performed with an Ingersoll-Rand Model surroundlnR cl k I 01 l , k 1940 Pneumatic air hammer operated at 0.17 N/mmt, the crack so rl [ 1 IIIIII tt rh I rat, j( s ' t FLRure 2 hove [ha Peening tool. Peening wrs can- d 7 tlnued until the veld toe became smooth, as plus- canoed to exl [ fl w,I lln„ .q. p:rt a u.+ u.,,d in T l5 s tratod In Fl Rure 1. 61- a crack was vlsuall this study va UO p 1-, p„w,rr •;,, r apparent, Y droop lnR V-[ tl a I I. rl. tl,. I, Ili ql I I •n w •, peening was continued until the crac cy k was uadd to start tl r s A I Ind,. IIw IH t , , I no longer visible. Thane variable criteria were ,vl n ',l( neeeaae ry ba<auee o[ cho variation In weld bond m ,II Im„r„r. 2 p,•, or tl, rlr- uud ?i - F ehaps end crack deaf., tungsten ten with lertrolr A?• h I? 2.2 Gas Tungsten Are Remelt The depth of the r, n,•I r,•I rrlr Ir.I rn rh„ ,,+ " j,;r 4 ;,`l A uccsae of tills I, r,u-, -, b l ,r., 1 v1j I l+ulr it l,•nt r Pnenetratlon w,n1,1 1_,_ k I-, 1_1 lu•i,w the it 5' i The gas tungsten arc proms. (GTA) involved remelt- urfnce and -01,1 r a,ll Inl r. nu ,n• I.,l lur. , All log maul at the veld toe. The tungsten electrode Argon-hell,' nl Kt n - . fOtly t „ :, we maM itmove) elolnR cho veld t oe of th eenece shield lnR• A r';A w,•1,61I r pl.,n I I la .hewn , , ' r ,? ,• G rate ande rsd a mal volume e Gitla let dnt e vel 1n PI ,n Rurn 1 1 y?yy f 1= ? l A? AA>i t 1 A f I '' ' r 01 a .35%. Fib, S 5 i .?cau..u F q - 9Ty , ?.e ' "t• ,F.; "k . y :.wrc:San ? ,, -. , a -_ .... _ f where Fe - elliptical crack front correction - 1/E(k) t F. - 1.211 - 0.186 Alb n m Fw - 1.0 Fg _ SCF and 4318 1 0, - 1 + 6.789 (7 ) ) Tf f SCF - - 3.539 log ?Z + 1.981 log I - c"el + 5.798 T in which Z - weld leg size, T - cover plate thick- se ss and Tf - flange thicknessP ` The crack shape was taken as a a Figure 4 CIA Welded Co.. vPlace End b - 3.55 .1.133 (2) ' E on Labor.tory Specimen Earl' r studies have suggested a maximum initial ' 3 FATIGUE BEHAVIOR OF AS-WELDED BEMIS crock size of 0.8 mm, and this was assumed to be $., f The test data include the 16 girders tested during the probable lower bound condition. This yielded a threshold fatigue stress range of 17.9 MPa. f.4 ' this study and the 6 girders tested earlier. The test data from both cover plate details are plotted The lower bound of the sloping portion of the S-N V in Figure 5. For [he details that were retrofitted, curve shown as Category E' in Figure 5 is given by ?`- the cycles at the time of retrofitting are plotted. f l h h l h 588 Equation 3 and is at east one o A t oug t e A steel beams trended to provide the least life of each stress log N - 11.13 - J.0 log Sr (3) range level, there was Hoc a signlficnnc difference - between th. fatigue resistance of the various l Al i Fi h 5 h 4 FATIGUE BEHAVIOR OF BEAMS stee s. so s own n gure Is t e C. to E design line f gory rom the 1974 AASHTO Sp Specification RETROFITTED BY GAS TUNGSTEN ARC REMELTING " , which is based on the 95 percent confidence limits Five details that experienced fatigue cracking were Y for 95% aurv Iva] of earlier teat on small beams. retrofitted by remelting the fatigue crack out by xn the gas tungsten arc remelt procedure. The details were subjected to nominal bending strene range of m T- rs,a , c 41.4 M+. and 55.2 MP.. The test result. are shown in Figure 6. ft, f y f.' ceuo-. t W t-.a rxv. 'b no^ qa ...•. P..w CrA e1 Tn? i 4, Gen n --e is .-.. ? ' " $n i ) ' w • x 1.M -fw n • e • 1M i1 M >? f sT G ? 4 a - , t a ° co. w., a '-L=F=t" ? 7+' ' i? a +q . a io' a s k Ceram to runmt y; Figure 5 Fatigue Strength of Full Size Cover-Plated o ? n 1 ? it Reams as Influenced by Type of Steel lo + w+ a+ f? ernes to re as .n Extreme life tests mt the smaller scale hen.. had demonstrated thne 100 milllnn constant Amplitude 1s1 fY cycles could be nuxtnl ned without detectable cracks Figure 6 Fatigue Resistance of Retrofitted , n at rtes range of 33.1 MPa (Fl-her, ec a1., 1981). Fn cf Rue-Dnma gad Details ;. , l large size beam. expcrienced failurex at The 1. ?( 27 7J.6 MI'n tress rnnFe between 13 and 66 million Figure 7 alto a a lonRl[udlnal acc[fon through the e c clan, y flange, cover plate, And [rnnsverne end weld which - tri` shove the remelted nrea. and beat-affected zones. ` h A lower bound fatigue raefatnnce was constructed on _ -' the bnxle of the text data and eetlmn ten from a All retrofitted details with the exception of one tteee? mthemsticel swdel develnpeA for cov.r-pl nted detail performed well and ngtln[ac torlly ext nnded F t ; beemx, This was estimated by equating the stress the fatlRUe re nfetnnce. The cracked beam Chet wsn 1 Intensity factor rnnµr AK to pK - 3.0 MI's T, The not anti sfnc tnrfly ret rofit led had n weld toe crack r 1 strexn intensity range was ink rnthne chat wan 115 = long at the time of the CIA remelt. hf .? ' ' It was Anon apparent that this crock was too deep df e n! it n tc e! t l] Aft f fl f d h 1 7 S O) AK - Y F i i e µ r a u as e u y. er n ure o t e e- toil, the crock surf ore, an exnminntlon Indies ad 1 1 ) tl t the rfglnnl r ck tip extended into the ? . t 1?s ? I. Rot, a .. L' ;?. h ?.^,r`.P l v F. +skT. ? '?•t'. "e9.n ,it . ?,?i ,.?.'t5 . ?' f ? t . ) T A? ?:s?xr,,. Be? "&g- i Fl gure 8, whl,.h .,haws ul the lungltud Iasi sec- [Lone n .Ir the veb vhl, +a bm•n potlshed and • etched.[ 6 FA'r[GI1E DAMAOR AT YEI,L0W M1LI. POND In oceobcr-Nn vembor 1970, during clean Lng and rc- painting of cl Y Il iw MLIL Pond Hrf.dge. one of tile cover-plated 1 tf tL and bridge nn Span l.1 was fount t I - I rt, r k, as 111 uat raced ? v E. ac e in Figure L. It ra k I J d loped at [he west ?, +h {ll?'. ii end of the prima ry cover plate on Beam 4. It had s° - 'stir grown from [hc cue of the cover-pta[e transverse lf. fillet veld Into the tension flange and up 400 mm i into the web. The cracked details were repaired by ?S Ile bolting spl ice places ,,cross [he cover-place ends. ,,--1 A visual Lnxpec[Lun (LOX magniflcuclon) showed that t- Figure 7 Longitudinal S-Lio., through Flange eenma 3 and 6 n Span 1L of he eastbound roadway, k Cover plate and 'f ranavecse End Weld which were ad lac. nt to the casualty girder, had i (GTA Re [ru flc) cracks along the ,:over-p late end. These cracks Et[.' were ubaeg,encly vert fled by ultrasonic testing, F v flange about 10 mm. This exceeded the remelt zone anda .sdepth of pent tracton equal. to 16 mm was mea- f and provided an un fused embedded c ack chat quick Ly .ore d. Thy w rbout o e-half the [Lange thick- re propagaeed through the 1,,sed Ligament. ness in depth and were found to have semiel LSptical shapes. An Indication of puss lble fatigue cracking 5 FATIGUE BEHAVIOR OF BEAMS a also observed at ELee ocher de tails on Span 10 RETROFITTED BY PEF.NINC and two on Span 1l.. No ultrasonic confirmation ? i could be ob Ca toed at the ocher possible crack Seven details were retrofitted by peen Lng. The re- locations. oohs are also shown In Figure 6. Only one detail q experienced sign"(irant [ruck growth in the racking, Subsequent: lnspeccions In 1977, 1976, 1977, and region. Several details experienced root c 1980 resealed addle LonaL cracks, as Lllus traced in ' ae Lllusc raced Sn Fig. A. Figure 9 (Fisher. et al., 1981). ?• P 4 y Y Figure 9 Crack at End of Cover Place {9ft'M?;,?s, ,[ M1' Figure 8 Crack In Peened Region and :u Weld Root 1r .+bv Inns chat R Y4'1 t +m P w Prom the re au its In Figure 6, l[ Is l a gnl[lcan[ increase In iec lguo r slscan... we ro achieved by peenin I,.x A p ; The baem expe,tearing [.ruck gr,vth In the p,•ened ? ? y 'F I J „pf'J? raglan had a 75 ;rm mark ong' th,• c.+e :r the clmc .k?? p? ! ,,?{.+ the dotal! wa pocnrd. No 1 1 I +haut the r V l ?1 t , aA "??•nl1 ' ' tame crack also at ratrnif c; t r ,blotted to a love ¦creee range ('.1 .4 MI ' `IP.,).,???,„ •'.( } t?-{? Apparently. the slight Inc n• Ln c c .? ?... ,{?* 9 t pq+t, llr wa euf [Se iane to overco[I . h..fl 1 I ft. a ,~ r(a a ?1 11 4 of Peening, Flgur ) 1111 ch r th t I.v 1 "` V 'jf lr fi'1 oped In the peened r xl. f the. r wl eh Mp.t ?4w', 'lr etrue range. A 1. gft 11 al •ue,.t L,n I I Figure. 10 PI n.+ .f toupee teA Uetnlls in Span ID, d ° '(+ through [hu I ..... m it+nge ant un• rr mxv,.r to 1'ul law MLIL Pond l wId. Tile far lguu rr.rrk tl, +t hul uxlst e.l rt [he wld toe sae prevun[ed from (urllu?r ruck prop., g:r- Figure IO I ,vs th.! pp roxlmate lac Clan of th„ lu- 91x11 I + [ion by the peening. tacit tl [ .r. 1 , I t J In I.1 10[:md x mmnrlr.,x {t the flndl. g v r I! t.x r. v.,ldsd en sc beams fl I r .r iI rt p 1 Illed rimsrv Cho i_ ttl The root crack that haul I,y,q,.11.+Le d urnu,Ah rho e[aneveree end void I+ rt.. I?n.rrent. 1'I+e origin outelde r I I r 1 .alt I -,ord-v. rho -r,,-k4 ., pa rent r• tm formed. at thv -Id I?•ox of ch, av.r ! of the root er.r• I• -Ad I Iv p plnrn coda. •,v ,7 - „' a`) Nine details in Spun 11 were vlsuol ly in- d veld toe. Int diate terminations were made at tervals because of the duty i l ac spec tad. Indlcatf ons of trot were foun y mm n approximate f these seven details. Very large cracks w observed at cycle of the portable welding unit. Each o _ the east end of Beam 5 of the eastbound bridge and terminations waa carried up to the weld face to ' Beam 4 of the westbound bridge - Span 11. prevent cratering at the weld toe. Figure 13 0 shows a gas tungsten arc remelt retrofit. 7 RETROFITTING EAST AND WESTBOUND SPAN 1 v Peening and gas [un6s[en arc remelting Procedures were used [o rector is [he cover-placed beams, in Spsn 10 of the Yellow Mill lead Bridge, which were found to have fa [igue damage. Twenty-five of the . cover-Plato details In Span 10 were repaired of ter h being inspected: 14 details were Peened and 11 ure 11 Fi d g . r a gas tungsten arc remelte details ue ch d ' " e at ea summarizes the type of repair that was ma cover plate weld Inc. All retrofitting was carried " out under normal traffic. •. ? ' N3 ` fd . [a c.rrt , "F 0cau xa i v..naa art . ux? vxN Y Pan 4 1 • aTa 1 Wa< - • e.a Figure 13 Gas Tungsten Arc Remelted Weld Toe t? me- k d crac s Seven of the remelted details that ha eeccable by ultrasonic examination were reinspected ,rtr _ after the repairs were co plated. The east primary :t - i, t eas t6ound bridge) pro details on Beams 2 and 4 (.. - w duced a spot indication at a depth of 3 mm. The ultrasonic examination of the vest primary details - on Be... 7 and 7, which had cracks about 13 mm deep _ (eastbound bridge), indicated a large embedded f - crack. The remelt nc these details did not change C h' R Figure 11 Repair Methods Applied to Span 10, the crack depth. These cracks were purposely treated without gouging and rewelding by conven- yellow Mill Pond t tonal means In order to evaluate the effectiveness ; of the treated detail, and the length of time re- r Peen lag was continued until the veld toe became eering [o d i to penecra[ed back through the quired for the crack y x ue p on eenooth. The depth of indentat weldment was to be compared with theoretical anti- was approximately 0.8 mm. Figure 12 shows a mates o[ llfa ex[ene ion. The depth of remelt pane- peened de mil on the bridge. tratlon was approximately 6 mm. No crack indications were found at the west pr1- miry detail of Beam 2 (eastbound bridge) or at the 3 (west f B l `.? _ I eam s o cast primary and secondsry detai bound bridge). t Y 8 CONCLUSIONS ,?$ 1 1 t t , ^7 The following concluafon. are boned on analysis and evaluation of the tees data abm lied during this j" 4 study on rc cults from earl lee work end on theore ti ral at udlca boned oa the application o[ the frncture .ochanics of fatigue crack growth. Y ? 8.1 Fatigue Behavior of Full Size Cover-I'lnted Beams 7`(?S5idk11` . , All retrofit welds on Span 10 were performed In the overhand posittnn. The arena to be welded veto s,ndbinxtrd to remove the mill neale that pro.o cex ,ad"'"' t lnx. A helium and organ .Ixturr shielding gas and a ra tha de yr r[ex nap, le bet wren 70 and 60 dpreex we used, been unr the mixture provided spout the ram, ;u-1 ntlnn on helium alone. Travel nPssd uan appr uxlmately 1.1 emn xrr• TI u• to tr.Pot veld unu ntane.l ou [be lrny ltudlnal ve•Id ter snd continued aLn,. l;' trnnsvvrxe weld tae. 11-e veld f iW11Y tern lna,ed nt tie up; site lnngitudles] (1) of Cracks were observed to form at the and, ll size ben., at oil levels l f f i? A hry"j cover p at ea o u of strena range examinrd In this study, (I.e. p t a „{k' 27.6 MPs to 55.2 MPn. A lover bound ext imn to 1 . 7 (y }+ of fatigue resistance for ext tome lifn nu R- „ go, led that the crack growth threshold stress range van 17.9 MPn. sfY (2) No difference in fatigue behavior was 1' .'i' observed for A36 and A580 full alto stccl beams, (7) A new fatigue strength category Ix needed ter full xlxe cover-plated beamn wl th flange - thickness equal nr granter than 20 axx thick. a t:'p 'area 9'MVI ' - ? ,... _-.. -.,r .•+in - ? f+ ,n ?•? ? ri: rK i Figure 12 Peened Detail ',r .. .. x ll `tea I? ?' J? L ? ?'A _. YS[l'aTJli1,'61.?i? '8 4 :kt?hY? _ (Y - '? ua, .? 4 4 '?pd#.3- ,?E2p? J(°iflf?t N _gl]} ,, ;V g 4 "e0„1, • Category E' vas !dope ed SRTO to define Laboratory, Le University, Bethlehem, Penneyl- the fatigue resin canto o such bridge members. vanda. Thenko are also due Ruth Crimes for typing ' y - the manuscript, Jack Gera for preparation of the 8.2 Retrofitting He [hods figures, and Richard Sopko for photographs. fi. (1) The two repair or improvement methods are C s? effective to varying degrees in extending the fatigue life in cover-plated booms. 21, - )' - Peening was effective as a repair method and Q' can be applied with good results to both un- tracked a -welded details end details with surface cracks having depths less than 3 mm _ This method was found to be dependent on the level of minimum 'treas. It was as Off. c- ! and under tive at higher stress range level high minimum stress. The application of high minimum stress lessened the effectiveness of peening, because it reduced the compression residual stress. Approximately the same_ " fatigue strength resulted for low level' of a ' minimum stress and for specimens peened under t '- minimum stress. Under these conditions, the , fatigue strength was improved one design category (i.e., from E' to E). The gas tungsten arc remelt pass was the most effective method examined and showed the •, least amount of minimum stress dependency. This method can be euc tens fully applied tm .r repair details with surface cracks up to app about 5 mm deep. U (2) Crack initiation at she toes of the fillet veld is caused by nonmetallic intrusions that result from the welding process. The presence ' of these intrusions was confirmed in thin gg & study. (3) Crack initiation in repaired beam' generally resulted from defects introduced by the re- pair method or from inadequate remelting. (Q y] '; Although an increase in life wan usually experienced, additional increases in life could be obtaI nod when the repairs were made with greater care. The application of the gas tungsten arc remelt pass to as-veldad ' beams will provide an increase I. fatigue strength comparable to one design stress s. category. (4) Full Bize cover-placed bs subjected to cyclic load. can be ro fit tad by peening or application of the g.. tungsten arc mm' It + procedure. The peening procedure appears to provide o relloble means of re [rof ltting dc- taile that hove very ems 11 crocks (leas than V ' 3 mm deep and It,a than about 50 mn long) ar ? x no vi Bible crack. For detai la with slightly larger cracks (up to 5 mm deep and a length up to 75 mm long), the goo tungsten are re- , rt,.nw melt Proca.s can be used providing there is adequate penetration. (5) Cracks with depths ?",at exceed the penetrn- lSty of the ga. tun go ten ore re- tinn c :Plh ! melt pss end the nffortiv..... of peening a cannot be repaired l+y the.v procedures. A tellable .1,.d of repair [or la r gc fatlRue cracks is the AppI lea tlon Of bolted splice, (yH platen that tran.fer the at rasa around the t ?' ll crack or by re¦tortng the nr lgf nel flange 4 + -?t g1t t and extension of the cover Plate. r 9 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS r ( The I nvestigation was In part undertaken by the ffti .% s writers as part o[ Noti anal Coops rattve Hl Rhway The opinions and findings expressed or implied in They are not re those of the writer. hi . s paper a t Research i on necssarily those of the Transportat e Board, the National Academy of Sciences, the Federal r?.5 Highway Administration, and the Americah Ansonia tion of State Highway and Tranapor cation Official., nor '"•ati'J of the individual states participating in the National Cooperative Highway Research Program. '4T 10 REFERENCES , BOWERS, D. G. (1973). Loading History Span No. 10 Yellow Mill Pond Bridge 195, Bridgeport, Connecticut. Hiehway. Research Record 428, Highway Research Board, pp. 64-71. BRINE, E. E., WEBBER, D., and BARON, H. G. .(1968). A Note on the Effect of Shot Peening on the Patigua Properties of Plain Plate and Welded Joints in 18% NI Maraging Steel and Al-Zn-Mg Alloy. Technical ,av' Noce No. 5/68, Military Engineering Experimental * Establishment, Christchurch, New Zealand, May. - FISHER, J. W., FRANK, K. H., HIRT, M. A., and McNAMEE, B. M. (1970). Effect of Weldments on the r.. ,1 Fatigue Strength of Steel Be.... NCHRP Report 102, I ? 114 pp. FISHER, J. W., ALBRECHT, P. A., YEN, B. T., . KLINGERMAN, D. J., and McNamee, B. M. (1974). Fatigue Strength of Steel Beams with Welded Stiffener. and Attachments. NCHRP Report 147, a}' 85 PP. FISHER, J. W. (1977). Bridge Fatl,"e Guide, - Design and Detail.. American net itata of struction S l C _ . tee on r FISHER, J. W., HAUSAMMANN, H., SULLIVAN, M. D., (1979). Detection and Repair of and PENSE, A. W { Fatigue Damage n Welded Highway Bridge., NM i Report 206, Transportation Re.e.rch Board, June. FISHER, J. W., SLOCKBOWER, R. E., HAUSAMMANN,"H., and PENSE, A. W. (1981). Long Time Observations 'i of a Fatigue Damaged Bridge. Journal of the Ir ' Technical Councils, ASCE, Vol. 107, No. TC1, April. GURNEY, T. R. (1979). Fatigue of Welded Struc- tures. Cambridge University Press, 2nd Edition. t HARRISON, J. D. (1966). Further Technique. for J Improving the Fati,gao Strength of Welded Joint.. Brltieh Welding Journal, Vol. 13, No. 11, pp. 642-647. MILLINGTON, D. (1973). TIC Dreaming to Improve Fatigue Properties in Welded High-Strength Steele. Metal Construction and British Welding Journal, Vol. 5, No. 4, April. WATKINSON, F., RODGER, P. H., end HARRISON, J. D. (197]). The Fn clRue Strength of Welded Jolnte and 'f Method. for Ito Imprnvemant. Proceedings, Conference on Fe tlgue of Welded Structure, The Weld Ing institute, pP. 97-111. ZF,TTLEMOY Ell N. and FISHER, J. W. (1977). Straw Gradient Corr- ti on Factor for Strom. Intensity at Welded Stiffeners and Cover Plate.. Welding Ramearch Su ep ment, Vol. 56, No. 12, December. rye ?`? Roo ch Program 17-15(2) at Feltz En%!. ring 4 dj h a +r? 'S1£ a?4++'?rr ?4a? W, r ?? ?a?,k iw. r a,, r ? ?rL? r - 1 p j, ? yyrl ( yr. + r 1 :i t F ? ti rhx + r i - r f •' 4 r ?' . t It r 1 JOURNAL OF THE TECHNICAL COUNCILS .. OF ASCE .. .T LONG TIME OBSERVATION OF A FATIGUE t DAMAGED BRIDGE' By John W. Fisher,' F. ASCE, Robert E. Slockbower,s A. M. ASCE, , Hans Hausammann; and Alan W. Pense' (Reviewed by the Technical Council on Research) a. I-RODUMION Fatigue cracking was first observed at the Yellow Mill Pond Bridge on the , Connecticut Turnpike (Interstate Route 95) in 1970. Fatigue crack growth had i -? resulted in complete fracture of a tension flange. Inspection of two beams adjacent to the fractured beam indicated fatigue cracks had propagated halfway through - their tension flange. Also, small cracks were visually observed (IOX magnification) j a ? at several other beams. Nondestructive verification could not always be obtained 9 for these smaller cracks using ultrasonic methods, dye penetrant, or magnetic panicle inspection procedures. A reexamination in 1973 provided confirmation that a crack existed at one cover plate detail. In 1976 a detailed inspection was conducted of the beams in the eastbound and westbound span 10 bridges. i : Follow-up inspections were carried out in November 1977 and November 1979. The possibility of fatigue cracking at cover-plated beam details was clearly demonstrated by the American Association of State Highway Officials (AASHO) ' Road Test (13), In this lest cracking occurred at relatively high service stress t ranges. Laboratory fatigue tests with constant amplitude loading have been used to define the design fatigue strengths of a wide range of details including , X cover-plated beams (7). Tests have also been undertaken on comparable small Fr1 t ?rit5?; 'Presented al the April 14-18,1980, ASCE Convention and Exposition. held at Portland, t! Oteg. (Preprint 80-029). -. .( Prof. of Civ. Engrg. and Assoc. Dir., Fritz Engrg. Lab., Lehigh Univ., Bethlehem, Pa, ' First Lieutenant, tat Engrg. Battalion, United States Army. 'Research Asst. Lehigh Univ. Bethlehem Pa. Fritz Engrg Lab T? t , , . ., , 'Prof. and Chma., Idetallutgy and Materials Engrg., Lehigh Univ., Bethlehem, Pa. _ t Note.-Discussion open until September 1, 1981, To extend the closing dale one month, a written request must be filed with the Manager of Technical and Professional Publications, L ?t ASCE. Manuscript was submitted for review for possible publication on April 22, 1980. Fyy{ This paper is Part of the journal of the Technical Councils of ASCE. Proceedings of the American Society of Civil Engineers, ®ASCE, Vol. 107, No. TCI, April, 1981. ISSN r ` ><?- 0148.9909/81/0001-0055/S01.00. ,1 t • c r?Y w r ?$ o ? - ?Y-. Bau arc ?9.9 ra ? ? ?` ? ar has y ' '^ .9 s` a g u ? x m „ 0 0 0 z y o " SYY F• .. E 9 `o ? `D ° N F b ° ?m w .o ? a Q n ° a ? ~ m _ ? ? 8 0 ".n m5 Bom H Y O O O F 9 o m a ° z° uUXUX UxXxx%xXXXx X%xxxX XX g' E ag,^,= xxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxxxxxxxux 3 ut m 1 U u z u u U z z X z z Z u U z u z u z u X x u 2 ?$^E I E i uZX Uk xXxxx XXVaUV U z u zXXXV Flu r_ xxxxxxx Xxxxxuxx zuxuuxx zz a E . _ Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxk ' = uuZUZUZZx zXZUU Z UVVZUZZZu E o= x u x u x x x x x x x x x x x x%%%xxxxx E kxxuxux Z%kxxxxxuxux U.Xxx m• "%ru%w"^"1<oe7m??n?33.3.?33v„3?u3 - -? u " .5uuOm5 ?'o?. 6v m ?u`??s '"•cu °-i.?° " c. a ° 2.9 _ u i° mgu.5 , u '? m?>•. c 3` u u o m a m e E ? o 5 6 c u 9 v u° c ° u ? F1', 5 a a 9 c? r y .° ` 3° u E Y L E 9" a? r? qq ? .5 ° rf " ^ q u ,? ? r .y um'gu °- y y ° v " v C N ?p c s ? y N°N• r , C ? r . T.? " "a " $ u ° V " y? r Y . oars" °?°-a a'J 5F' ? ? ? •? ? soa? .? m-°no ?$ Yi ,'nN s . ig3•"u? a , °u •?o.???'4? ??.5 ? e o .5 ( 9 3 h ° e a 6 y •' o u p q; u u o n u o 3 ^ r -'? ? u a v c y 9 g y c w $ a r ^ uti S 3 0 ?•F?S Z,. 9'? ? . oo` o' t o u ua'y c?, o°=3 r'?9 3 9 ?".5 o m A a gg ° ???? ?•? o v a3I .2i • '? a` rv° ? ?v i $ ; u u o u w °o ° 'S ; ? ^ - 'p ,? a v 3. x,'.3'o g u ? ° ,n 9 a, y ° ? 9 g 9 o o •a o x o 9 9 .? o E m ? m cd ? ? .9 ? ?.o :t N ? -?? m u'= °m-N°m ^s ?o u:.?$.g9uF3?? .9 We ou? S?°x•900°-3or C J ¢ o J f O o ^? 3 °g? G '-?°' a x$ 6 2 0 ?i ?d ra •' a o u .S ,7 .9 •B r U 6•°_ g c s o '?' , d d` o. a a i3 0 !!?? r •? `o g a °? .? ? r a u i u u x' ,.. c o .b' v 5 s 3 3. u 3 a `< I• ° ; u° 3 o c :9 0; U a `V g u rL^ fi a° $ g^g u b v ,orr ?, l 4 `m r °w u aoe hao y09 .r u.?5a ?: ° 5 o x u 8m e"+ f h ti .? i .gq su o 9 a o w° .q •? - ti .. x' y F= p q° .5 a Z`.? _ {. .? r: ?;' •? T a ? u os O LL o o v as f3 o y ? m.9 °a ? ? 9 u c .? ? u: d 9 i v X •9 0° 3 a. C ? o-?° ? Q v ` l?4 '? ?.Y? '., y? ?. >.9 ,g ?a 'av2'" cT? .u s`•'d$ c ?°'? s•a a.9^.?:a a a "s • Q 1 ? ?7'? ? ??$go '?a5g? ??. ?m '?h.??u ??.'?y_•g_u"i'?g^ o?.?v ??c ',?3 i` r?? Z a d u °o_ 'oar a u Z'3 u ea m 3 0 0.? om x K. a? ,y x, u •g ? e a? 3 .??' ?•9 8? b Z ? a3389 i ;n 4 oQ 9Z.°x.'9 C9d 2a°,o'd u•uY .?St<gae2ag'^'?§$BiS?? ?a??3'y390suo? e ?l uV ?'M? o g ? qy 3?3 5 °g s u 5 a :ay uo ?=?: u° ? ? o?- ? N ?. .,? ' 1'r ?? ,7?Cm .. i .9 .s7o t w '.?i?? ,.?^. a 9'w a x.3 ? ° nF? ??? ov•a ?° ,0`??9= a ` i t. f .:`I 'YeiJ'?^r.Jw a??,r. „?i7?,.4 •ire. r.y' 4?lfil-?Li''".,?°""?-L?; `.nef??? ; ,>rre. 1 l 1 cif C t -4FJ ? ? 1 fib ? ,Lf • ?i a .5 a a w ? O ?"?ft?', p gr ?' m v°m ? xt u 3 ?'q ° ° o ° «33 4^'5 5 u ; 9 o r 9m? c? m 3 u L a =u .o - i-? ? m n o- o ;J 3? v.?`u •'aF 3 .: ' n ac 3 l?' 4? ?? 3 m" u o?_ !? a u y y ...x1 ^' tx a'9 n° L O v a ? •O l ? ° $ ^ a ,°r 3 a] o y y n A r°, ? P r o a o ,.. ` u 6 c a X n 3 ? `o ma .'? u a ?- v u a 9 ? ?' . a g o u` N '0 3 a u .s j. H t r •O °• °• 8 'O w n s y G v 3 au a E m 3 ° '7. Ali , 'E '44 ass U .'rAt. L''n '°a o e 3m 1 m u?v '¢Y 4 r C m ?. CC !?9p O W -7 R H ? ? _ t t - o n? o o a m? n p t4? 9?'a us.9<N. ir ??.9 I o ?A9 r ep u n 404 T' L,Y?' q.9? _m»?- ?•-n??,y- - gngmgn - P8?$m$m u td?Y ? ': -JC vY » 4 rv v v v V w [, "t m?a 0 Q 3t 7 a_ o =8 r7o°?° q -a?6 S^.- ?6ryaa8?_"3?fiR; S?o F° ro m5* ;akaaa g ?_? W SAL-" t ,Y7y, e? n q-? N' 1 ? ra <°? ? m e3g- ` g"sas?=8g? »a??g??_ v_5?»s?ga,a a ?.s ?°q 0 , ,'' + s ?' S as ?? k., ,g9q» X14 '?I .1 .'• C Y A ?.1 R Nw'Ir tN (I ?' -} ? 4 y ry ? ? o . 3 ? : a d 3 3 °Wn n W °Y,•.1 w r "-y ? + a ? w° °° y?; -4 ? 1^ri?•.N S?; l 1 1 7 , ?E 11It } ' ? d,; f A 1 4 },, 1 Wy j 'StI 111y,'' !a.'.14" T yT?inpewx., H 4 r( 1 .? • r 11 'iA nz, r? ?. 1 ? ?d? t 1 t 4 ? • r ? f i l MIS= d e 23 c$ a v N vGa v` o° {yt As N U y odW'39NOtl 553tl15 GC y 4 SOWxY r i?",', ,? C 'J+ ? ? ? odw 30NVn 55]tl 15 ? 8 a a w ? u Y}ii?`eo3r _ ud ,? yu ?° a R R 4 m : a °? F 4 V? _a / / a zy°_^oe ya 99 T•- O O p m l T E 3 ? q. f i N '?C fi 39NVtl ss]nls W W V ,E B y u 3 fi ii• u 14 - .?']9nvn ss]nds - u° w u y°• •„?, -rte 1 ti ? o u •9 NN•aC ° N<q ; ° s n'°y `°ca? u ? ° o ? !? ? u^ "+r; 0. m uY C O T NBFOO: iv ?'?'"°•u6l.o c•9 ,q??s ??? ? ?.I S ". `„5 I 9? v -`• II e= V u .a a•? w g a L u° o p. x Sol! 'Sc 6 vtl? ¢1 G' a` u o 'o fi 3 v°, °' a. u"° a a 3° o.;^ 6 u '2 C •C c e.°? t=yyv.9 g?? ?ua.3 ??a ?ay?ua o9? ? X?.,A 69 u s I 9r, 4 u g° S° a b° fi h ?°. a s '? n° `u < °°'C o. m a 3 v -° e She t µi? _ i 35 a u °u •? .. 3 ?•? m°•a u'?uY u ° ? u u ...]•O °'L`$ ..1 z? .... Pill i J 1 ISM 1-2 11 03.9 ?FSBo'-u 11 11 AA.-,1 ?Q9aF>° W 9. Y p Y 9 - .9 x, a u u ? u $9 eeE3 .O u u y Y N fi? N B r? e°'a a' 9 H a °d ° E a e a ~ u g ?? q abaBSes ''STT?a9?= ?? too 3 v?o +? w 3m ° `'° Z eyb?s u, .a o Ha-? ? o fia H-01 a WA: ify `d u`o NmMI! = a ?i ? 9'? mB •' 3 u U:c e$? o ?u? o ?r HUM.93 a cg y OO Y i '0 Ai 8 ?n ? ? n C r Fv B $ v?o p 3 Pu ? ,8g8aa ?.. u qq 3 ;, u u? ? o ?.mo'oS ? $? .. gg C .q,'9 'p `a 'A C ? 3 r` rya o °9 5 5 .9 v u t .9 :2 '9 ?°O? ?, m.. `m8 ? y 'g?$9,8°Bo v? '?C 8c 53 gu>`a? I„ uu 13,13 ny 'j ` ?$?.9U5 3+ eo .? ?2ro.3s 6a god $.$•0 '.oa EH3 °''??.?°. x J m 3 ? °•° e'c.9 °'??8 Nuu eayJO 50 ?o?T ? aoq oO ????c ?° '+'a•Oi : ?? IIN?°-T?.?m°?.9 ?,?o ?Ha °?v+ rv??3??? 9 Nlf4S%` •? o ? m ? •?a 8_ `m = u u .9 ? y 3 v H ? p a $ ? •- c u ? u o o'?a g ? 3 u m ? $ °`° w v m 3 + y ? .3 ? II ? ? `? Es. ? .9 ° o ? 3 ° u° N `e? c u u •?u°- .9 .? a w n u o o T w y °' 8„ °v 8 rJ- II Y + y I+. II e Y '3 a .. `o u u m .. u u C d ? 0 9 ,-..9 a` `o z w? 9 0 ? ?° ? ?. y C o° =_ II c .c >. e v .. u s .. °° m e ° o o m or o n y? 8 .-. 3 0 ? u. u,c?uu a>? fin" ; a??u•?a 3.x '?c m?j u.m$ .°au uu3'g???o u?°. z ??°_.m_^`oso°o ?u? tio'???.°a?yyoe• c'?.?u Yau 6y ?y+e i?.8v m3 p i.w u? um` .? u9 ; ur: .. :3 '9y oYa •5?v N+u"d o°"o.o '.. 'J 8a ?'?:?? ct°.u 3E..°•? v? ...a u?_?? T:2 ms ? Utra Y., m M1.- •O- 3 .8 .> `0 8 m u ? 4 y s H _ S o u >' ; .g `? v ° °Y II °u $ $ ', Y, m ??' ? ? .. '? ? U •9 ` ` ° I+. u •° .; c a 9 + u ? ? H - °° °? ? a 'y ? m U a T W ° 66 -?`o yE K ?Y•'3 .5g o u'e8 uN -? a c yA a s " u.5E5+°we .wm,?a ug `?•O ?m°o 8e _c.. ??•uue "Y°a Asa ? II '? u 2 .b m V ? ? 3 b II -' -' .o ? •y m u F? a. w '4 u o . Y _ ? -. q>. o a a 3 .. k II o .5 d ° u° e° 01 8 0 s i1 'S m m? 8._'Oa C U mu a, ?`' c II =-•' a?•s Y? m w Cv,y? a ea °aa? u £'. o. 3 .+w m a y o u °m II :3 II :2 ° 4' O 'a y+ u=- 2 .9 y v n u N° c ° o' a fi?,•? > o " w < 3 u @ 3 t H ° a 'e3 ° '? ? °• c, o y `o :`'.Sy 4 v??" r ?'9 `u .5 ° u` 5 8 Ala .9 11 ° C ,°_ °u G `ov m`o°v°.°?S'9 p OU 8.5UDU'a 3 W2?N:'9 3:°. a r • t d V Vg° X "' 9 s u x J ` h u O Y a ? T+ r + O . r 3 •=o. 9 ? Ci N v 5 ` .' 3 w F ca 5N F u as ?.? + w °o ` i O m ? N q a - Y T O ? w °y' 3° T q 6 3? c _u 9 u E +?` y 9 N e? ? a $? J 3°3u ?3? y S M 1 _° 'a • ? ' $ 0 3 k _ u Jen • ?owrx sauJS w ? n° ri :c IS y O " 3 ? ,x i~ s ,,?a o c u ?o. •,. 2h g? a?'? arc ?.o u.5 ,s6?o R R s c8'-°?+p gg °? -?I '. IJi •VI' •9?N'?-+ ?pyiGpy 'O La c.°_J ?? t 1 '31 - u?a mga .93= e ? f. bS?a?sS'??J°v ?aL ?? j //// ¢? ups ?C?•y'???. V'? u a, 3 I '."+ ? ?+- 3 > Y S `°.? .9 •a '+- ° ? ,:, :2 a a o ? / / ? t ? 2 ?` ? u " ° ? °a m.'jY ?ny?t?auN II 9 9 s°'a5 s q~ ? Jn o? 75'y?{? ? ?1?•: ? ? ??^? P L ?v u'e5'? °? ??' c % / ? 3. a.+? 2? Q,? $=i ? o ms c? ?a 5 ? ?m 1?pr" ?r? ; ,? ?? s' 0 8 ?? 4Y°.???•g '?` 'e o9 x,;t. ', %. 1.8 /' y Y °op?4 o??t :a2 U° /."';Rams .5+?ua+an°e'3 3:? 'd?i'nr ?°? ?u tso, 9+ ?q5 / "r 3nii?°i9 ? u?y ug°?rJBYa ? ?'H ?? s2 a 3 ?. .3 C y + ??. ?oMrr cs»JS E? " ,ry o 9 0 •v T ?. i, ?' ? ? •? ? b ? a o 9 p s s l-° 3 8 O ? G tR +? a y ° .' r ? ? c 8 ? ? ? ? n;ti, l '" ?? • ;:',^'/^^1A ' it9 - ?? ? 1 ? d'L i t It' x ti u tog ?I a d 11W !A RAS fill q Tm p o.y _2y o .. 1o fiat 55?? :i `u N u oe .9 u1 F !'OY, a '3 'O C 3 B _ x? 25 S° ? r '3 u `•' E C 9°- a `o sew ' amava ss?ais ? a m s MUM,! °^ o P >, ° ° '^ 4 '? y°?aY 8?m as>85b' / 9o - ?s °E 3 `? w `" r T? ,a r °? y W / / ? 8 Y `o °u m N °: y a m - w ?3o`=guo,?o ?'+?? „._cY,y?y a ?/ / / Sao b Y.. ?°uo 11b sit! -t a c 33..8-.9nazm r?Oggm? ?? Y // / ? na°. _ ? e ram"> 'v's °g`3 ?°? Y•ua ti. u u •`3 c? 3 m? z? ° ? 8 ::.v fi "' ? ? •, // / p ? ?? .3 u N m ? 9 ? ° s o° v? `O ?.. O cv°u ?m.e uY-.?ucu rvA w4 8? / / / i? i •_-. tY, `-`°s o`°Bu? tcu C' o.o y"'°°Q2 ao=v=.ceo? / / / im h uHO W'v:°°a°°m `ir. m N y a. = N .. I n z '9 rr ' ?sann ss?ais o y y o°O ° H '" ?., a, B A ??55$??u.?`°.? vaau uoc E NNm °' °oCg u ri? a R6 ?>` a m `o u? ? A c? >u o m N Hamill 'u v FQ• ?° U ?ovF vii. c ?a c LL u C ? r u S" a° v. r° - m .. o r u ?. ? R a g u 141"s 3 r O x .` o s s A 9 114 is 116 m 114 6° 9 '1r' A r .u 1i ° ur .. v y u C u a v, 3 C ro= .15 0uO ?° u a"^ 2 1 k r F ? ? E W ? mu??.=? ms's `J' u'g c o. °O °$,'-?.??v.. a c o? ?•° ,YOg y?u E :+ ux 9omv ??c x?';e6m a?g` co.9 o? m?? ea?N,9g5? •9 = a yu. a 3 .2 ? o? ? n o rv a u c b a 9 ..j o pi ° .9 L u 3 °u a A? m. .5 ?u g K ,? :1 F? •? ? ,9 a '?v m 9 u a S= ,.,r?, r ??$}& ?yA C n S o$ ,0 3 0 6 .vr. n `u A u J 9 04 1 u U,??uB??? u•=o? •30 ?L..s???? i'3?mZ•?ma'43c?`oa °,ca o_9°N,?uai $ `? :?,,°v u?' ? $d .a ? ° $ a.'o~ .9n > u•vC ? °o m 'B:v'a ?• Jv 2 ?i ?G a 8W? oW wdy K L ° '? F ? v, 8 c .+ •-0 M o ?<?,r m9o3sru'3y°1Ila madR u'9OHIO 4.9 ?' 3•.o F?a?'° . NT1 y 3u •. °9?- 3 1°9 k ¢ X LS `?°. u°w r3.9 y.`7 0 7?'9 G r o ° " u ??? °u-'g 9a m + ?" yp, °d $? E28?c7 a Um.9?mcq 3? 0 8° s°0 v_L°ur '0G ??`o `o cvH / PHI I 11011 Y ? ?` 1 =8 O3goazM•4t9v9•a?°? Eac•???g? 7G'?$.9? (i?eg :t . •?? ? '? 88`?.'°3$?3?rn M ?iS?Bqa???.g?t`8? "? ` u < _ gy qQ?, ?,? ?-'09ae<?11a.?1 v?g3 i' • ?R?nA ; .. SS 9 o 5? g 8 R C, u 3 $ 8 .a C?J 3 8 ?r Q >: j 8 E .? v N a.? b! Sy fl?f. ?-• .,j vv': o`o <d8 ax »?.3 u8?•5 ?°_:?F° c°.90 ?'?o3 ?^.a3 ' ., .. .. ?a r ? t t ' 1; + 1 tO,a14. _.... -?.._?::%.?.. ``?. tea. - -??' ' i.•-••-sa::-- ?: ?i.._ _.-i,_., ?:_ 'r'ay' - '_.4nyk?..?' ^ o 'a a n ? ? 3 •C ° 8 1 1 tl ? $ oil 116 11 4 h o °G n H o 1, 1 J ? ,°z a °•`?S u: !i me 6 3c_ u: '? sit 2 ? v -1 5 `a ywng :x ° -act. "? " O u •a> " N 9 a ? 3 o t °a- u , .- • 2 m- 3 `o > .,.- ,,?it+. .5Soo aeo <? a^?a a 1a3 v•? 5 N =k ?'. ',qqh? u?i < C uF"• m v C < ?n ?a3 e u 9 al Ir. r ?+), Wa? aC3 o.? ^`? io 5 C tZpu ? ?m <?S °o?a m" .?.=v ?v ?4? 4a? " 0 " ?. .?.am .9?m?c oz ?`o '•, ? m[9,n 9 o°c y.?? '? "tea u°- .r,?r. ;t o wog. v.a=t-° oo c° m_ °n@.? o „m t=>°o'gio ?? v;bq ?3 .nay r" ^4, "u'° Ea?•°z ? _A m?? Elaa z$ p3 _L€y? ?E-° J? 'e 1 i - •. '? w 'N n` O o ?.c ->° Y a o ? 3 ?$ _ o was •' ? aaa° v? a p _ p N$° uoz '?? ay Z°? .S?',y'??mS o `d9 `Em??_°e,9 C.2 uno ?u urn: a?a?Cm>mo it ?rF°=Nty m is go, X NO uo g Ya'm- vc`o°n as Sy u`?3a0 x`o ?`ov .6O it ART ?E mm? h? f+ WIT, ,. r a?C7 ?o>.'?= >•.`'. $,°5tl usrn 1e.5.. L -ma c11 to T ° °e= •? - w? -rb f °? eFc°< v-°c7oa9 m3°= -32 3 a c ?5 y o ?'c` o ° o?c:C?'xd_a3 a Na?H<> _?°?°° F wy mg„ Q?a fi arc 3 z <a ,°n > ¢?tim V°1-Uc `o?ma °ws2n: `n=U.9 z°c7 .5x=??n3=1=4,>m°N== {? r cSa3 oa a` #,y ??, r .?• 1 s °°...?y? a ey @ ? ? a ° ! 5d yF, =" >.? I as •- Him Mao 3@u.9ufi$?»??° u =o°'G6 u6m ??5 °? '?d? cu `° °qoo y ibS 3 ? 6 ? •s L e o ? y `u C'?7 `u 9 9 5 e s E °o ? u b+ N -° a?? a ? 9pa• a r,oa ccii _ yyy h u a d u¢ ?8.??uF" m.3<?°9c'm ON MINIMUM 3 - ?=3°r "d m'°'? _???`?"? `g? b'$• vfi '=;?°O-u? u >o_°°y ?u ?.,;.,? , C lot, N. `r t b.1i'3?w .9 •c .?a.?'??.+3u3,3?? ?u?c_393? E a9 •a2 a .6 ,! 9..: S? ? ° a. c ? > y K N'? •j ? ? 9 a ?7 3 `o@ x g n uNs°?? g ` 9 • ` .x .?'a a cv o '° ?. c l aaa y C m v °? °?ue` av w p s •??? ??: Ny m°? , ? c ?, , °? m ,?p?'a? y•?•'?.c? .>>. 0°..?3 , , 050 ??? M v ? ?` e.5 y. , A LU Ufi?F••r??$ w.a u , a '^ o? E l Z t a u- Y n u> I i u u? u N? z ,? 4 v? . l 'y '$ u v' 3 ?>..g <2 •" .. 5 3 a, ., q 8 s < t y y T d 1-1 o... 3 r o ..o o w ?? a 3 ° = ??ryo u.9 $ C ' . ygc I q 9 o 3 ` `o u pe ,^??,? t?yytt 'g` ?OU2??xO ll '? •l g all 'r? ?d B 9 e0 @a'3"o'2So?.? .•-• u o W ° ? Q ' 4 , , •2 yb Oa,2S t o 9 21 a fi,a Zx po? ?o '` N ? W ?°° ao?.? {°,. ° ` 8 °?•o v.9 H i Ull 11 1 11 ? 3335 ? 2 O 9 0 n+ O ? O ' NI r ? r h?d "k, to ? 'Sa r ?ri+r, J ?a ? go?nYe? 7 -' . , ? s n P ? Ge t. G 1? .T-,..r ,m ,,sr^ri ^ r y M Ikd?3 ?? i)rVt k'?2 ?+2 r ], i '.% C ? r 7v ?4r m?J - ;-r7 ',yb e a of o, d K _ V H 1 tp f N U u N N o v n ` r?^i I G O F \ N ? In \ N G ' ' ' N 1 u) G O N n .r N O N N N v O ' I I, I` ?? G H °1 U VI t: O ) \ ' s i u v ~ o In .a Q r I I J J m I 1; c o .y m c? Ot Q N N c: O .u U' U Q G 4 V N N N •H •o N VI a N V I uoo Q 2- c-0 W J ( I I I ? ? I ? I I @??:'?'.?t'?`3`a'`' '?T"wv?:' ?'•,3?';,;",? "`"."?es'" ?"' . .:.-. ?" ;'.. •R. ^ ?T?"`,'" ?:?'? ..:ter:, ., y:?': ? =''?".? { { ?1f?A1? ?^+mvy ?'( { l? ct `{'1SF?F ? 1 •WW RN? { 1 r { r {9 i ?? dPky? ? { t { Y I { 1 r i? t. 9 s, Y l w'mk'AEd4P;..Allll I W ! -• xis A L a , 12 W .1 } 0 1 ! i i i r ? i r u? ! i '.°1,. '. ,?f ?? • K, Lr??? n ,? ,,r , ,. nL r tir rv ru?e'?' ? ? ?yyY Gi '? r I?i?t???p ? ?4?! `! ! • yr:.l}fin. ?1 ?lz,r. ?' ? r t : Y ?<i; U t?4, i ? fill YY by } I v t a ?- t k VI OI i I r ; I t O? 14 1 I I I I I I I j N v r O a ? N ,,qq m I I I I o N r w G: I I N I Ul 1, ti O N n .r N O ? N N •r o ( I I I I I I • I . 1 1. A a U N 1: O e+ UI l A y u rl '? .? o n 1 i ?. o s of N O v N u v G F ? T ' tl n' N M c: „ I I N C C . i O. ' w ? I --r I I I • O i I I I I I ' r 1 ? 'r MA ,550, LEE AN ? ' ff4VV , ? O U U Vl ti $ F- J W J - ,I urv q ? M ? O W U ? ~ d Y U ? ' r? P } N S Z o 1 ? o \ Z N Z? O }} ? I C ae O J ofO 1 ? F n iS q l J Q KIL K > Uj ? ? v 1 i y7 7 f ? A' } C.. bi i? 7 i 1. r {s S r t? 1 i tul r r' 1 ?? i ?&+ ?' ? lye"' Of' s? ?q,tr i ,w ?" yl ? ? 'YF?' ?? r , •'?y??r. ?.,^'r' J i I f G: .. _ ,4?wMifWll . _ _ .. ..'off °?? :?.? :? ?:? ?: ?a ! ?+,?r;. v ?ie y r, n ?tJ,f i?S.; ti? f?i / ZI 4? 5 ? ' S? / il?, 1F i. ?? t Y'? ? t } ?' ?' i ?l y?? ? :;?r " Abu ,r - ? `? ? ?'? 7 •?€15?? +'rc' NTH t.t ?_ - 8;.«. ? iri. .""`*- ?.:-s?>`: 3: •rs.+• ',...arid..-va . .. , ... t m: R gives -._ - --_... _-....... tl ' with- a _ dis- - - k How you can improve your cold patch mix p i £ ea ' ints. rma- Bituminous cold patching material used Evaluated three years later, the ex- Angular aggregate shape Is pref. ct S . . t pot- for winter street maintenance does not perlmental mix appeared to be per- arable. Whlle well-graded mixes using „t N• nher perform well. Moreover, little effort forming as well as the Sylvax U.P.M. angular aggregates are difficult to r1 - •hed- appears to have been expended in Further tests of the experimental mix work, this is not true of a mix of smaller tl con- designing an Improved cold patching Indicates that It has performed well In and predominantly one-size grada- s 5- mix ... or at least until now. Two Pennsylvania Department of numerous installations. Many test holes were atched while tem r t lion. This mix can incorporate suffi- i t bit i bi d t I 1 • that T ti t i p pe a ures were c en um nous n er o mprove " not ranspor a on eng neers, Prithvl between 22F and 35F, and with oc• workability, while It will continue to a I- ?; oing Kandhal and Dale Mellott, told last ' casional snow flurries falling. Some of density under traffic and adapt to the tt 'Jim- year s Transportation Research Board the holes were wet, and some had Ice geometry of the hole. cut •• Annual Meeting of the results of their In the bottom. Failures have occurred At the small end of the gradation, P h - arinl, efforts to design a cold mix that would In the pavement surrounding the the minus 200 fraction should be kept t - 7p - bout prove more durable, without sacrlfic• Ing the workabilit needed for stock- patches, but most of the patches sur- vived I d di i as low as possible-a maximum of I - - ' y l n goo con t on. ' two percent, and preferably less than ? a pi ing and cold weather handling. Pennsylvania s suggested speclll- one percent. Excessive fines make 6 - The design procedure was compll- cation for stockpiled cold-patch ma- the mortar lean and friable, lacking in hnnes caled by the fact that certain proper- terials incorporates provisions for both cohesion and adhesion. At dust -:. -, tarry ties necessary In a stockpile have a locally avallable materials that may be contents of three percent or more, t 1s he negative effect when the mix Is placed i th th l less desirable than the optimum: even increasing the binder content ? s the Pe of n e po o e: Aggregate O en radation gradation. P 9 Bituminous materials - does not appear to help workability. Overall, the preferred gradation calls s1 p - arks provides good workability, but a dense Between 1 November and 1 March, for 100 percent passing the -inch .' t r - arty gradation Improves durability. only the following bituminous ma- sieve, 65 to 100 percent passing the,, " '. +field Aggregate shape. Rounded aggre• t id d k terials, as defined by PennDOT spec- No. 4 sieve, 10 to 40 percent passing; - ga e prov es goo wor ability, but ifications, may be used: MC-250 the No. 8 sieve, 0 to 10 percent pass- angular aggregate is necessary for in- cutback asphalt; ME-250 emulsified Ing the No. 16, and a maximum of Iwo -' a near- place stability. cutback asphalt; E-10 emulsified as- percent passing the No. 200. , .. with Binder viscosity. Low binder viscosity phalt with high-float residue; E-12 ca- Another Important characteristic of - The Is necessary for storageabllity, and tonic, emulsified asphalt; and RT-4 the aggregate is absorption. If poss. c - 3uired workability, but higher viscosity pro- coal tar. Ible,aggregatewithlessthanoneper- n re• vides better cohesion after the mix Is The MC-250 and ME-250 asphalts cent water absorption should be used. f N large in place. Binder content Hi h id l bit must be treated with anti-stripping High moisture content in absorptive J -_• mrcr • 'er to . g res ua umen content is necessary to provide stick- agents to meet thewet•coating, static. Immersion, and stripping test require- aggregates often results in binder- drainage problems In the stockpile or - y?w with fth iness and durability of the asphaltic film on the aggregate, but binder con- ments. Materials E-10 and E-12 must pass the dry- and wet-stone coating in stripping. Selective absorption of the lighter fraction of tho binder by a? -ailed tent is limited by the fact that exces- tests. All tests must be performed us• such aggregates leaves a bituminous r 's sive binder will drain from the mix Ing the same aggregate that will be film significantly different from the ~ when It is first placed hot Into the used In the fin l i i i l bi d d ft i h . nitial stockpile - a m x. E t i i d or g na er, an o n en w t unde- Bible . D i h i x ens ve test ng emonstrated that slrable characteristics. t o in. esp te t ese d rect contradictions, P nDOT f l i none of the many anti-stripping agents If aggregate with water absorption I , ..' ' I the _ net en was success u n design- Ing a mixthatcould bestockplledwitn- available was suitable for use with all aggregates. Because a major factor of more than. one percent must be used, then the specified 4.5 percent - ` 1 urk, out difficultY, and also provided good In patch failure Is the stripping of the minimum binder residue must be in- ,• durabilitywhen placed In patches, The binder from the aggregate through the creased accordingly. For aggregates per- experimental mix was placed a num. r f b th l I t combination of traffic loading and wet with water absorptions of from 1.1 to a a rite po a o o es n wo roadways In A ril 1977 Com ani t h conditions, it Is imperative that the 1.5 percent, the percent binder real- x _ f ' iginal p . p on pa c es were proposed anti-stripping agent be tested due must be 5.0 If the aggregate ab• ,? k t • on as o n as placed using Sylvax U.P.M., a pro- using the job aggregate. sorption Is 1.6 to 2.0 percent, the ` ` evice priatary patching mixture obtained from Aggregate required binder residue Is 5.5 percent.. I • tt t g_ ould Sylvax Chemical Corporation, Great For aggregates witn2.1102.5 percent t S ' . 4 and Neck, New York, and previously to- orted to rovide su erior t h The aggregate Is predominantly one i h i ll i l I water absorption, the binder residue ' ?d r 3 Is an p p p , pa c es, ze, w s t a mater a passing the A- must be 6.0 percent. ¦ {, t !?r ' 'r ,, nta• Both mixes were placed I? wet, un• Inch or No. 4 sieve. Previous expori• r y ef prepared potholes. once had led to the use of larger size etc aggregate, but experiments showed f ? ain, that this material was stable In the r °,. { ! rc• patch only if the hole were properly s,y prepared. In a hole filled without proper 1ey preparation, the larger aggregate will l l di to's rave , ea ng to premature failure of th h ed e patc . rk, 1 h h aP,Vv .4 s1s $0 ti f h 191; IN - 17F'??5j'1 i w >M - ? _ i 1r ti Cdr i ? s T 1 1 ?s All O U N U N ? ~ ? °V?r? N r -. N .FK T s •V O l}/1 ? ? -?) 111-•\ ? J f,x-.Z _ ? \ ?.l[? ? ? Frl it "f '-.y ?? ?? `? ?. ',l V n 2 L U ao ? f.7 y W ,.{ 5 r _ r N o ?' a ? r ?. 3? ? a of a. N U N F F 1 ? N \ w N 2g O N S F J \ N' _ y O V N p• M M Z x :p • t7 S V yawl 1A \N U N \ \ W o a om= \N r„ ?' in•D M ui M J O ?? j r M K u \ ? N 4 3v k N Z V O y J J u a c9 U TT F " Lry §h bi! S N J V . O yy N N ? W ?p '? h Y U V ? V O Z \ N z mw m \ w ^ ! U ? t n ,ant r? f r N o i h ZNZ J `?J \ .1 U , Q Y l9 0 1 S ? O O ?!4 N C) Z ti. 0 J J y 4 ? Z O i a I ' I a hl? . U Q Z. K W . O ly .., J O Ix O J...Y a o w a w a ?``c1 to J J ? lid, ?`. 1 "Y) in) n ? z rae e?1 I i P? y p 0 1 K w V 0 0 (?7 N {Z- F Q? J ? ?: : M O S N ? ? ^1 G N O I aU ,n w Z N O .3 1 t , .. c3 S U y r \V1 U In 1 in \ \ N w } \ •? y'•1 \ V1 r J J ? \V K r ?cn \ n 3 v _ J Q V < V F .:r 1 v .. \ a - -- = z -- -- mw r m \w K M t V ? l E 76 vi \ V r r \ ?n o. ?n Z J E N ? J Q J a l0 - - - S cD o - a ; o y N c n a w K V• ° J r Z O K O r a a Lu C.. ,' zz 0 z I a m g z u- C J O K I o a w w r o a a a, i: .. a t? ?A tt N r4 eft" t d? J r ? U r ? e , t r Q = r h' rr r J ? P a 1 6 1 d LI, +n YJ1 t w ao LU w a o Q I N1 i? h ?{ 751 - ?« me tfi 4 r + Y ' A^ ^p X t+i?et?v llujrc l 4v? ?' suuprr? + _r „? r?..r., ??A x t.i? f1 { '1T an q r r+ tI 26 .u r?c? c?? cl61 c-l cle/ tlcl c?,t ^U, cl i F F o o 'o ? V1 h (n mod, NIS i i ? 1 1 g 4 C Y ?; s M o ? vt v N 1 M u ........... _ cr fro M _- _ ._. I -A a Z N O d U ? W }} W Tn ? ? I 0 W V V1 VZ\Z1 N O m F -F ?J `? N 2 ? N F J ey_ C t ? M M Z ?, d b 1jy u a a =`? r ST.? S U r '1 T ? ILd \ O \ U W d } \ IA n.Ix ~ M J n J L Ix M M C } mo I ... \ F Ln 3 v N I ZZO J L U V a S? JJ v ? ? N O 4 •- N ?I nZi } V\1 \ W ? Q F _ T I all I 't a i r 7P >'-,, `7 ry,?ry,F-. ''g?+ I 1 { r ,}sf<i i ?i W L :r A? R1Y1'. ( 'l ? 1 '1 f fih' L '? 1 ?J a , k .. r4 - Nzla k N? W ® Y x fee s ry `- gi V3 (? '??,?? •? tl q S ,?` , n `?J ? +c7 M ?k e to ?a r ? I 771 i x 's u w ? J ? t9 ? O Q '? KJ ?? 9 '?h ?a a , Q Q ?: ?, Q i? ? Q ?• § j ?u h0 68° h 6 11 ZO O `h U o J a k MD c? L7, cc M1 \ A7 \ \/ tJ \ ,?7 M\ z o u gt O p ? o o po t t k r J "?^ w not ?x I?Zlld Ca ` v m ? u uu° J F 6 It 14 ll-? vik IN) 1 G N -% ?m 7, M I KU -" n t? Q - 3 ee do b„ OQ Oe 10 UD Co ? ? Q Q ? ? u ? G ) n O li I? + vl e ? art +? Prk w } &uni i hl S' ? 1 s LLJ 4 a 'tC3'. ?? 4 . traa of tp t t Y N p 9 b 0 `t v } V) 4z. F0 ?' b y J F ? 6 10, J < 1 `1I << kg \? ti H \ '?. Y g • `4. o ? t € n t Y C O oz \ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - t ? } A a •1 ?f ? ' 1 t 4 ?ry ?yl 1 6t f 0 O ui a a a -' a K W w a E N Y r 0 ? h n ? O ni N O O t O `1? -co Q 10 'Z; r O JQ p y y 9 O Jo ? JZ 1? ?. 4? a kh v? N ` < Z r Y 0 4 8 v ? C r r ? Lit OY in N N N g: h h N (? N N tl• M M C(1 Z v J V J v` a c v m 0 S4 v ° :3 N •H a) m v .C: ul 0 3 N ro ai O to al U A W al A U Ln 3 o ° U N W 4J 10 a a U U) 0 .14 .u a W ••i N rd a w o . L4 z .N a a E 41 U '°0 U W W A 0 a) o o 4J x .v N W O W al g P4 0 0 4 N w w o ro w w o 0 10 w w 41 N w o o 0 0 ro W E! u •., a a • + 0 H 0 00 LW 404 W H O W O W +j ° v 41 -W a x U N N lT ° a a 0 u U -4 -H N >r z w w ro W A O O W 3 . i +J G > U U U r N 0 r •. U O N •.roI u o N O N ° u ro N + w a a u 1 J w o m o 0 0 a x a 1) ro 41 o ro 0 M fm z ro Ga m a: v N i a N z 88 6 8 8 8 8 - 8 h {hZ N 7 1.Yb? ? I Jt 1 9K ILI- v ? Z j y i ro - ._ . ,U i v OAS ?, - q ) il O o? s a L z w i ?I 0 J ?. 11 ? p • 6 p 0 ? N i N 3 ° LZ v U T J Q r 3 I n O O << 011 ' E 3G ? u v a O Q. O I g Lg 1 tl d i VO b' VIT CAP V? k17P v- . ? } r t .. ?1l WN}i•„ r} r i i F ? r 1 i i r >r .lfi w 0 ' Q ¦ .a r 11 )..yk-N ?' y L ly I ' ? ti. v1' r,? `$ Y G v ro ° 4 v N •.a a) x ? 41 N ? m 0 3 -P ? ro r v ai N u a ro ° a J 41 of 3 ? a ., oq ) U 4 41 'o 'o N 4 N O Y 7? U 7 •, i) +) (n ° % ra a . 4 0 a a) a) a a .-I O 41 W N w a z ro x •a a C E + u ' U '°O U W W A • . N x ? ° ° ° - 3 w o 0 x ' i U U U ° O .0 a) 0 41 rz 41 0) 0' Q? y w 04 o ° m x o W o 6 L •n 04 W .1 W W ~ W W }J o b o v+ aa)i a) w +, .u [ y )d O U .Ni .1 C -'n ;. v +' u a a X w W ; a 11 O O N C > O U U C: n.. V) ro 3 0 to -4 ro 1) •n • m O .1 C ° 0 N y $4 m ° u ° N m ° a '• b J o s °1 ro n ro z 10 A co W a N a y z ) r i ? yr 4 '? + r? Y 1 ) r 4 y 0 o MJ V ?`LJV •1 a o 0 N Ao m N p O Q h ?a h ti h ? <0 0u ?0 0 V r i 0 J Q oC 0 t° V VU, O n J ? IQ . 1. U ? r s k 3 ? J a J oo m Rg m ? Y 0 ? t 4 ? Q O O OY ? N N N ?: ?' h b h •v (? N N tl• lr M Its 3 n I? ? ? a r ?- Y 9 k s n E K• i N tp d 19 0 n ? J W y -T I I'l I I I I N t a y a ° H n t UU J F IL Q o d ? w .. Mao ? t l ig + i r 1r 't . i F7ii .... u -Z K . .te Po -al t kf I n Ann v 0 t . W o m -., . libo?144 3 , Wry ^1 ' C (^ V YI 0 i ? ? ? '!G `-YY" ? ?n?1}}?df?? I y,"'^?.9^^"l. '.."°e919'?, .'?p???'.-'py9pe?n,.. ?n ;?• p ?? 5 M Y a , f 'i mr..iR I ? a J a W s w r M4 1 .' E O ....... ., _e e ir, t; ?I n ° 1 }^ T ?, i;? ¢.v,•H. ,lal;.rvy"- "Pr .tr?-•-,- -............... 0 b `? L aid J ? J ?qy J V ° h ? ° tti N C 0 v 0 R o o h 40 J O 0 4 F L o ? Q f 2 o V F 4 4 - H m oo E m 3 ? N Q N Y Al 0 4 g v J o v 0 0 e? ? N fV N N r N N 4 M M M VA a ? ? . {'?Ji;. ! s ???W'my?7 r&' ? iv hfb Y` ` l ?: ? i. V ti 1 ? t { F y p .?_ ?...... is ?'__ _ ?? _?....? u ??._.:,3:?.?•a.:..:._:.W'.::-.V`?._sv..?.. --......lc?ei?.. ?a_.--. __..mxc?.?____...? .f. - 717 a Yd ° ° r O N f& ? • ? ? o o `N O N a) e ti h °^ ° 1r 0 pV '° a) M1 "? 1 V 4; £ a) i, 41 W p T M S5 S c V V D Y1 In 3 i_, N ra w ?"- ' ro W ` m m a N o g m ° :3 .11 - a ?u to N ro v? ro u f ?< w o H ?4 Q X O J-1 F= 1, N r` 1 O F 44 t) o ° aa)i o 0 0 a Y 1WW? ` N ?G •n •n f y ) / L 3 ``? J J N o a v ° °, 0 0 w ` c ? q? ? V N 3 u N r ° J S `? o° x (1) a Q ,°, f i lei N p . A O O .••? v 1° a ° w a a . C r r r- 4j w o H o o N 0 O O O O y° w w w ro u o tr N 0 1,4 N 41 N g` O N ° a a -4 4j U oz ,-1 ..1 N ?I Z a) W ro f n ,l? 44 E) u ??r i N N ` r .1`tlt• ..1 a) O it rer; d` N w ro m y V M M a u a N Y o. s u v r d ro ?`, i.+ti t 1 ! A 'd' V V ?1 u+ O E a O X.4 O aq, E ° u 1 f .,) X {'b 1• < A 2 A K) P°' Ucu 4) a 7 N Z 7 i )" Saa i k ?+ tq 4, 7. t i O a ?fj z o p F b O N ? a ? s ? O k < o h a J ? r 6 Q ZO O W `` _J ? r W ? J < ?g k8 3 9 G g r O G r &y G M k` O ,F F q? Y i :mt k; u " t, Awl w?C1 - 4 a '?1 w ".Q ?tQYY'4? F ? J 4 4 S r if,< q ;a 1 I???wril °`."SAR.?,'q'4"'° - ^-. AFP• .,yp " .-.. w? .., e*+?. _, h s': 7*77 "7a Li°9 ? ? ti tam , W o f ? ? Q Z Y n h ? h n ? 0 m N C O v O R O o Vl 4E h ti h 40 a 0 o Q J O oQ J? ? o ? o ? v V ? J 7 ti V? ? Q 1 y , J (? K p m ? m s? lr kE ?° 3 0 4 ? 4 v r O O O O gL r n Lr N N fy N aL h ? ? N ? N N tl• M M ? ? v 4 "P m rt' v 5a?^ Y ,..r, , ;.pry L y : F.. ro 7 U) G t N O 4 J Y m O 3 ±?' , S4 ) a) a) N a V r ; .. U .C +1 W N .C U In d 0 41 U) ro v 44 N (1) a 4 N O 1 U 0 O •d N -H N rl rd a ro u •- o ai N v w a G z N 41 -'4 0 41 0 ° 4) 44 44 0 41 .54 .- 0 0 w 0 0) a) N a 0 3 0 % N U U N 0 b w 1.1 w 0 O 4 d) N V o w 0 W rz >1 J-r •M ° a ° a (a •H ° 0 v 41 F , 4 W )4 N :3 44 0 H w w 4j 4j 44 O b W Cl N u JJ C x 10 a) N N w ti N U ,1 .7 «?7 u .-1 •.1 N >1 z 4) 4) . to w ro „ IC 10 1.J W S U U O > V r 41 fU 4J - w ro 4 N ? E Q) E o W U o w I d w w 4J w w o E a o z a o 4J E 4J a m N d) E a o z m w w w z 000000es ?LRSa1 J C Pu I1J ? F t? t Q 6 °"' . ? E t y ?? r ?Y h.. ? 1? Vi ,lt +' a ? I'I !. h I ? A'i N f?V 1 y ?4 o s, I W a J a w l f O N 7'•1 O ? b ?hv \\ ? aiW `Y\ r c; a Q a n ? u m N ? R O o C o O h lk J L t o ? Q oe ? o ? „ ?: V X J? ?Z h ?, V "• ? ? 4 h 0 7 ? J ? (? X t V J J g m w m ? m K m L L a ? s e i ? V ?l ?l Q Q Q gt r ,. a. ^ N N N oz h h N (? N N o V• M M (n ? ` r J 3 V' r 141 i H ? O '? R O ? x v ? N O U [ fx $ - ? N N En ? Ul 4J rd Y . . ra}.?y w - +? ro a) N ?' a) w a U 4 4J Ul 4? rp ? , a L U . 0 ° ro w u b (D a) En r 0 J ° '41 4 ;:j •1 n ro l a ro O .? O Q) a) a c o 41 a E ° 4J m j u ° U •u w w q t ` C) w 0 O 3 W 4 w o e p L 0 v p ° w w 0. 0 " w N a 4 O O -+ w° E •u •n w 0 , •.i ro £ k O W vr l ? .{J O w W ~ W W ro d 0 tjl Q) (1) 4J 41 { 10 - '1 0 .14 9: 44 (13 4j ?o 10 sj w 3 •H 4j O o u) Ia 0 ID ro .14 N Q) •r I a 0 IA 3 w •.I U O ro O -S w ro u ? a P 0 44 a u) w 4j 1w 4 7 ro ro m a to o (LI Q) E! m A Z Q CO P: w ul z Y. 1 4? ? r OOOOOOrJO ?' - t ?F"q%Y I ?Y 2 l lrr:i.;l?'?'' "rtl?' ? 1?.?,??• i 1:.1." 1...,.?+r? -1? I ILjY?,''1 t i ? a wn ,t w U ? ? r ro ? C W Y 1 J F1 Ir a ? a o u ? U , v J O b k z J ? ? J J J ?/ u w ? V 7 y ° ? d 0 d 9 d a ? ?' Q ? O e a ,,4 . v? ? ? dd J w U c] ? u? IrJM T ? M? ? a M ? 6 U < a ?s W O? ' uV ?L ? p, C Y 1 J o 1 u of g M? gg 8 M a w a J K 9 t + ?' t1? w 1 r1 :a 4 t t4 r 9 ,? t {?TlR°r s• e.Y pf YA1tg1 ! 'r4 YU f ?? 1 d ?!'? A• 5 i 1+ ???! ~' °?166fVVj. r1 ?' j ; . ; ? „? . , r y? ' '7 l?'. r ??' r; ? til _ t ? I ` k O .U k 1 N U ro U w w 4 4J -14 -m N f4 O W U) 3 a o o c W w l N U U i) a O .C to w N ? O W 44 E .0- 0 N a A O O r? r t ' ,O O Q Q a W p H 0 0 +) O w 44 44 b g? a G ty' cy v N N l N ro •? o W °i ,N, c v O: h W -4 1) () i-7 o-7 •,.) it w U) N z > d b 4J w 3 .? i) O O N r N N N o >i w v o " n N s v N U W 'o 0 ?4 ; O tl C? M R? 4 a a W ate, a p d V J S ?, 44° o a s. 41 u w X 103 0 N E L S N W W F Q) m U ` (3888880- (9 ?' j - ? i S nttis ' t?n?w P' w -y 1" e W J a a -a d d 0 w 3 ?J ct v v I 0 9 0 ? a y •? Y ? TF ? uuu F N 6 W 3 ? ? ? 1? ?' ? cs \ a ? E 3 ?b q z ?? G u g ? C ? V/ C b° ? g ae C? og K oz g t M a ` r?? 4 V }°Tr?IrY .' '. y ? V I' l i ? ,r A; rd ?i =11 O -H l4 r-4 v v v X o u E N U 'O U w W p 4) x •- 0 0 0 N m O U1 N 3 a o o c N W N u U 0 41 41 04 04 F, N EL A O O r4 w 0 . n 0. w •:° N w N W N l y it O W ~ W 2 r0 7 q O tT ,yW (u I.r 4j .4r ro •.01 j O u ?N-I rNl C (v 14 ti •.1 N >, w z G) N W g: ro ro ij •> G1 U o o 3 4 •.ro+ u o N o N N w4J "' a u a 9f o o t ??? i. if x 41 v w0 0 o 11 i G d ?1 mv m v a ro a < r) ro m s ro w ar e v 1tS i v o z a ai a° N w z r ?adA u r r ` oo 883888- (a ? a yIrt 1 ? • ! i r 11v? 'i! r l1 - x: r ? r t J}^[?? { D'id' u{T W?7tk i5'.r? ` ; i ? k ti . , w VW arr. ? ? ? n?•• •.. S.. ^ 1 ", S'. wlt ?Sr f?-J?l ???: Y $ rv ' 3 , r ? ? rte' i .f I ,yam u 3' l 8 urvY ?T i `sr •S Zs- , + V ' +. V8 le' ? ,I , ` ' 'l e ` . ` t ` i? ? •? ? Y . ? m ? ?? , ? ?. y ? tl r S- i ? a r k r ti? i 5 ??? } shed ?4 ?7 1?f -Aw i al _ a wl u F 0 0 Y 0 C Q \ ? ? ? u r ? V ?` V J W § v V ? t o o h < o w D J r pp0 u O q Q C a ° i Q o? ? 1( v k Jo 0 ?? h 1. ` F O p g V 8 m K ?° 3 W \14 J N j L `o ? 4 C 13 t ? f` r O O O O cy rn N N N o: h h i h a l t, rv (? N N tl• M M ? i ° d O , ? :n7 + xs ?ti N N CO 41 ro ro o ` • ul mx y, a ?• N C N N a X cW ro v S 4J 0 3 ? c. ? ro v v N yl ' Y a ro _ U .C H U N W + ro ro v v a U a •.I u a n ro p a ro v ' , v v w o u v 1r 4 ' 4 •.I N z 4 -I a e m i x o +•r N U ro U w w o o v o 0 0 4J .4 . N O W U 0 a o 0 arc U W L, 40 v 4 w a u ? t " " o ° ° o ra u N t+ w 3.1 s v ? 44 t a o w~ w w ro 41 5 t 0 tT v Gl N L U C X ro G7 N UI r axr rr v °u a s .-r ..a w >, z v v m ,? ro 0 L f jYyY W w . -3; 4 ro 0 M N n a q o o o 0 0 r zzuu ,? 3 u• a u o ro o u °t'f . N N 0 0. ??^. ?c ?c '? ;.' to ?, d , t $+? ,?? G a w 0 44 L' fA 0 N Uu WO N w q , ..+. E m N w 8??, rf;. S ?r"I ro 'ro m o v u m ,? ?r A z A C1 fx V) N 2 ,.? 00000000 } ? b. ?S? Sf Yi II Y ZZ, n h ? . a if w c7 a J Q r n .. [ a . j - Vi ' ? ^Y 1 i ? \ I ? ? ? qS 4? \ I1 ?F f e tit 1 ? ., .. to V r 0 l i ? J fv? .1 e1 ?n .yam \ n ? ? v' tJ U a p ? t:? C <? G a Q= ?? ti 1 i g } Z- ?- C g Ly _ - - a [ i 77tT? + ka. fre A MOCO 44 IJ u + c [ .71 74 0 tii } c y ^? IN , ?' 1e( k? }1F y R U { f ? ? ? 47 I?P y - ? .?`t;"r?lr wry s ?P W l7 >a 9 ro Sc 1? sG fib 6 6 C•6 3 o b° i Q J' U J J \Y 1J ni. r o a s. . F ? -CJ Y V? X6'6 (1) C Y oho `e Y t 0 0= ? rO `Y F C S a ? Yu r: is e o 41 ,r. ? a N ` a (RZ, n n ! J * 4 ' L. H. ? L t esq.. may, + v Iry ry vl to O lf-y v 4 Tj I t ' ? ? y ' fY d' < W S ? ? t t.Y V ?_ O Bryn ` ` 1 d elf ty a 't F ????? p` q . Q V rt ? l rf F.+tl? ;? I !rT r I?? vnM ? 1 ,. 1 ? . i 1 ? 1A t ?'n Xm J? S 9ffi?r c Vi - s • s? ?w t 5 t W c7 J W k ?i w. t. ? t 4 ro o r c" rp h a . s i L - xt T - c"- t $ ry _ `` i spry 9 t k k g tr s 0 o: :x, 4 9ti 1 ? V lye fi Lu a 41 CFA'' m J C .? W Q E i C F ?';. by r r 0 __.? _.. of ..,... r 1 k J. L ? A S .\ ?` s. i L sh J ?` ?N J CL i -bi -? tY C r - 'Qj ?-j A^, r ''? OQ C r ar O ? y 0 _ a 1 1 1 1 T a.2'c t a rC t1;? w ? t ,_ 'Wr -77 i 1 i ^??? } _'. `.?,:.. i i ? ? e?' ?9 r ? -0?rl? i?'wf 1? P ?? "i d ?. F f.1., V : f 1 a r k J1 f ? 1 ?p ? ?7y '++M f i?l9er 1Y dP f? ? 1. 1 ?' ? 3 J('"v+? ??A? 7 *0o•o =ZZ•o '54 45G'4G j4G.GGr. G4 °(7 il- Il 1111' f10(i' l • 1no•000o001 =•0o0'z x•005 004 x•0oz *l0•t? +G4•UZ y *1,1 •Il4L'Z +f3/.•9 1 •l•l, l 19 +Il,,l .nkt•4c3I ,Ill,•1,hg , l l • /,9 96 9 .1111.111 .f31•/.IIS I J J 1 1 6 16r 8 r 6.4r 3 U'/ • " A = 178.76+ 211•02* 1I1 00- 2UU•U5 262 U I + 36.96* 67.11+ 4U7.2U+ 184 A0r 35 20* 4 11? 352 0U* 122 61* 16.78• 30.74+ 2-.'150 17x 13.42* 24 59+ 38 ll1 240•x 5UU•= 1 20 r 000 • (IUT 50U•x 2x000•= 1x00 1,10 0IT lA•- 1 0 22= IJ •Ull* y, S , r ary ,r, „ 1 suss 4y T 0, 4 u O U U } V I ti I , \ ?1 v \ n w O ( Z. VI T v m M F - J J_ 1 _ D O 00 a. O ? , k rVj, ut J N M 7 0 7 J ?° U ° ° w? O J N e N \ N ?v O o r- r p 'J' r r ?a ? I U ? I I . I ? I I ,J W , N = J U ' T " u > } ? O s 6? M J 7 m ? 1 U \a w N N J r1 tJ N V W ? rn p m J J\` Z 3 v N ;? n.9 ? M M M C v U V v N N N N N 3? N N N I O ? 0 r In w c? \9 V? N 3 Q M ?9 O 0- -? N O }} F F u l7 } U } w ,.• c OZ ? ut Q Z 00 w ?w v ~ ? N co 9 V i ', a N ` n v l E M Q .9 o rn ` o ? 0 ? o l o a ` r D `i r ?? N T M O Q U \ .. 1 f ? / N ?" 110 N ? y? ° z ? O O O 3 a ? N ? ~ ?o ? U O ? 7 ro q F nn E rz? \ ? y m r Q £ I f 0 I `r u w z o a. y ? ?? ^ 1 J O a a w 0 ?. r ? 7r - ? J l1 o w kC V y l Ll a 4 3? d bra `t n-. ? r? ?I ? .? ? ; • 1, ?. t,, =r i W I ?? V ?t \ ? y?M } Z N - v ?y ..§ ` I ; N J U MD u zl m : a NZ 11 _ V ? N d V Z - 1? I O N 'o I J H T ? O_ - ,. u o o O O O ' M O N p Q5- ? l N O au . w w \ \ o \N _?N M?O N = f- c r :5 S ~ K u M M Z o ? N ? 1' ' ? rTUi ? - f N ? S ? ? M N N t ?y a8 ?U Y Y 7 I O N d u M M C U V U O Vl p n --_ --_ 1. \ In N 1 J U ? U F u. ? f O d- N O ^9 Y W •.' ' 1 (D cv oZ N ? as 00 W F;. m --- -- ? \w J y r Z ? o i 1 ? O Z H n ? ,:i o t\if O ? CJ' Q ? ? ? N ? ?7} /U?} N J Q \ V f? 1 G7 N p Z ,? i?) :! Q N QO f J l e &i 00 u ?.1 lWil w [ 1 F"5?' µ! H 1 N r ?r?? rar 1? a W Z ve a J O w - Of a L b G! > a a ' ??, l 1? F 1 { V4,y?a?.tj'1 i r i -?, ,?t?jj?,, .? t?i,.?•???. __!'??.,r?..'. ? ??'."'?•`?' ,'?"°?"'"',,, 'i. .?' r ?? ??i S 2? ? , 47 N / a? 11 ?r?' SIl tr fi L' N, ? c c , C ;;- r. ex ra , vwnra ,.. n r? s? JEFFERSON COUNTY F DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ACTION REQUEST / REQUESTED BY- I/In t_q r5A rDAJ DATE- ADDRESS- 10,14IJ. OPJ K/7 PHONE NO.- ?r? ! U /G. C'!-_°/l/ I; ("CO -) ALT. PH. NO NATURE OF REQUEST- IN PERSON ? BY PHONE ? BY LETTER TAKEN BY- 4 _ PERTAINING TD- ]OFFICE ? ENG/SURVEY _ MAINT. ? EQUIP. MAIN ] REQUEST FOR. /L //ti LOCATION-.ROAD NAME ROAD NUMBER 6 PROJECT- PROJECT TITLE PROJECT NUM ?^ DESCRIPTION.-??G H/"! / r.Q/QV?L- /C _Al-47- If L o6 / 61.7- CO t3 E ?.G E/7 . %/, tcl ou I Elf :d /?LlS r w r 0 /LErJ Ab;2 /Z4F4 FCC .??Zav EL oc» ? /o,v ac oiL ,Erb A? ,?,???? ATTACH MAP OR SKETCH REFER TO- lel/G? ?I/U ?n?`'!W % ll fJ) RESPOND BY- '. RESPONSE. 7-0 1014y We .YiQl?l-'!7 Fog r/u,-J 7,1l5 1115-A A' cuHy "JAE L>2RaU E? Oc?/2 ri6ti rt t is 4Ei - O ti h _ 514 c FuLC?Y U N Ocr S T oc? D. -5Aiy 2 1u s T 1 j'5T -p/ REVIEWED BY• ` ? G DATE- CONTACTED REQUESTER ® IN PERSON ? BY PHONE ? BY LETTER CONTACTED 8 : "/• MM RECOMMENDATION- •. PREPARE ESTIMATK,FOR- PREPARE ROUTE TO- INITIAL ? DIRECTOR ? CONSTRUCTION ENG. ?.. ACOOUFI ?ryp ? ASSISTANT DIR. ? PLANNING ENGINEER JN ?t0 ? ROAD SUPERVISOR ? ADMIN. ASSISTANT x hL- 4 .. ,A ? ? SOLID WASTE - .P. /v.. w 774li r ?.. . 0*4 7- 7-14C /,e/L O,hT.E (sl ' ? ? F r.j ? ?\l 1 a 01d zu'r ell e- T !j6f 1_0 PuT 9 15 Sc?cw All, =a Y ? L ryryyt .61'•641 $F}d yl N .1` d 7/L/tiG , `/GC ag6 . » i vi l / #e a: z r U3 W U F o U V Vl ? f, .~. •. I 1n e6i1i:'d N O ?1 O Q N? K ?? v\? T r O N ? m W O ? ^? `Y "`' Y? '9 Y, r`# re V li O U J0. F U C J to J V 'J V v J 6, C? N •? V° v: M m 2'r" i2 U cn M a s o c4 l 14 N N O O N CS, O- N Vl 6 C ?- u V; I o W m q? N = r ;Wb I ? N F J it -c? C' M M Z ? y? ? V O ? O t?1 0 41 O Ilk) U r ,: \ \ H \ N N nl ? G m i o a N N N I N tv) tJ I ?, _ m N v1 V? v? N 3 V j H h, ui.D M u? J ?. . \U M M C vJ V V V V v U V V V v ? ? I S; a ° N `? N `? cJ N rJ d N N c ? hn 6v ? ? n ? N ? O\ o ? O M ? ;, ?s, Y R: N } W Mr 115 Z a J \ ? o a w w r U• Q M _ Z -- - 0o W \ W n K U M ? J p Y vl V 1? Vf ? r ? N u s ? o N O C; (5N f ? ? rr V J i- F Cf ? w Z F E a g a Q U 1 V` . ° I 1 ? ni ? m I N \ ? Q d: ? N ? Cr p ni J O pp O . ? ?,; O a°Z 0 O J w r z 0 d O K W o tavQ q? \N9 9 n v? 1 t`Wt` CAL r ? Q 71 N m A h nY. V 1.? I ?zr s? A?,I Q M P'v h fl a ll.? u a K cx? W ?A G O W V v V? ?!- N p i `? o v M N 4°- M Q i N L?, V h ' Iws+ I `. G? ? 1 cX Q; F { 11V X ` ` 1 r??C O ° N `? a ? LL q C'o o \? d cb N ? O \ v_ Y a c n1 V w -" {{ uj 1 I0 J z 0' o 'y a- 7 ' Q v > b , Q O a r w `L (?. p U c o U < a Q C1 u Q _i 1 1 v-. r "fin •,, r? r ----------- - ----- ,a ___._ GLLS_.Z ?e5 7 /P{G Zbb Y ;?i' / C ov ..PST t A? at u `S AMA K '.? a?? x '??'?y'r"V !? ? ??g`" + _ ? YEAR: . , . ..,?. -,. ? SLy o'L % ?° ROADS FOR OILING i' q4 e.Tt ,,4r ears-a c G0. RDl kP-T. T. ?•i rigs ?f ?s R y i?! 9 280 a/S /d 6y ? .2z' F A jog VA 30,;7.1 5? y o a R 6S6 s 6 7 I Ile-i-7--Z 62,,vT /00 u JVC A f 1 - C453 /al Z?fi (JL?k/(lE? /7 v. WRr??? I vll o(O .3.1 / V OCD Wa Uv y// zo i ; / f S" D O J.1.1.? rf M Z, L"h HL.?sb S 57- e0 i3Yz ,?z cHS_z I ale.-ate ?.at psy s- ?' " 1 F f? I 'A it 32`/ r l ? ' 13 ? Z6o 1459 dos Hog V, R z9.s - =- 3,0&-qj5 l116-16 1 d U.? ?y.oz I'J?rf-IK97r 61;)1- 111) acafz 149, 2?0 ?6y / ' i ?? • `I ? / 1762K 9,9;2 2z ?2.?? y5Y 7yt ??.70 „ ? a R •-76 6 s 6 7 yo< 2?' 292 / S ;?o' k ?3.?? 1409.2/ (0 3/ ,22 ' S6 ds /? Ufr2?V??i /?v. 3?Io 1 .? ? b oZ0 28•» / h'// o -2 20 .Z S- u HG.15b ? 9. ?l ?? /3 z 2 .2z i CHs-; / I I ti1C acl ?. 5 IP.4S-.2 o.z/ logv S r--7 k 4 c YYY ?, IN r t ?? i ? 1 li rf Y z ?I ii ?r5 _ 1 r t' a + Y? ),` ? E ? r ti 7+ I v? ? r r ^y'xt ?? i 1 ??. ?dWV? p,{'?44 13;" A? ROADS FOR OILING r RGI. J E C-l'Zoi A?d U/ -/o N-nzg 4 V2 <<b,,? f r', r 32-1 28v /a 6-1 /. 2 ' F? ny/ ?? _<L??//cc 2VII + ?G°``` G 2S 90 7, 7 79 22 7 « ., ., . c? ?n„R ?. G'/a ysr ' 7.y.? • X2.70 R ?. ?/z 6sE s 6 y a/ 1tv 'A / -A S >Zor! I Coy= ?/ X226 r , ??• AF S Zoo ? ;U I R 4 y ?f ; la c 2z ' 1017 I ? f•r 1 ?. s- C..nA'c s c?n"E f?•r ° 1312 1 eHS-.? F r r /0 i 5' n LI C-1 esd/ Dclt/ ..? .3s cM::z 1 ?.--•-••--??•--fir-- ° + r'.. +? , r wtr'M'1`f?r VV,A' to ? {Y{ .r r 1 t 5: } ? 4 1?4f? t s? n1 '.S } +'? -+. 1? ? . fµ 4 ?M 3' ' Aw 'N 7 yr ' ,? tYi p¢?i?+ .l1?1 ?f{h ltr YJ=/y Y. 'l ,,..?{ : 4 A ? ? f? r M ? F 1 •??4 V 1 11 1 ? ? r + ? 1 ` 7 h 1 f t 1 Y I l f .« ?. ? C v na qr ., vC41/[ 3/,? 2??, <l /any ? „2 ' All/ t f cl c???? , ?.• s Z an i N r9c Mr,?' f l a Of / O ;ZD ' 1 I 1 12' z y J d O ? 5 HG 1 0 y O / 9 C HS-.L ,, . ens • J ?/ , •.?S rIS P Ad e- I . 4-1 71 xT? yam'` ' '" ' yt?ryy a" p t '' ' ' a ° ?' ' s ! " ' +1, 1?... ..-. ... 6 ?? YOY. FF, R1'.+ _? v ddA3 'Y'7 . 3.? n:•.2uTM. Rk /o IA„ •r ? . i "1lix" PAVEMENT CONDITION RATING SHEET I1 RATER ` DATE CONTROL DATA BIDE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENTS ?• 3 COggUO- 2 i WAVE6 ALL10AT G A CH CNIN AGS, flAVELINO LON01? VER Ofl T CNOINAL LgL 5 v S ? ECTION STATE ]I ia F %' rk , ROAD L00 ll BEGIN END N 0. M P M P 1 . . . . ' 3, % NI B ;so a Z .?r. z I..? FF •.M1 ? A' 3)v 0 ? '. 1 ? ^ J ? •ir ylsitl b?1 w)?.' .l' _ k • 4u?rd 0 Q Q?.? •1114. '4 7 1 }•' dr ._ 3Y r. _- I • I I .O _ a. ?i, r1um1LlbM1 ty j r. ` ?, •• A-0w - 1li1. Wm //l 111"10117" 171 1/ .J/I" UI O-J14" ?gp@YTq??! S? ?' ? "S!";LL+?..'a ?F. •w .' V 4{-??I?K'J r?ir.? ?, r T''1 •: 1 ] pp ) ??r r , ?' 1 I CO NTROL DATA RIDE BITU MINOUS PAVEMENTS ? x i c ?; LOPPUO- TION WAVEi. HUMP6 ALLIOATOP CPACNINO III Xnirl n. I l PAVELINO OP FLUSNINO L.NOI- T GIHAL CP AC N INO ligW hlEln ` VEP6E CPACNINO He R.«bn PATCHING %A-01H.. 1115% u c ' o ? ?t? xP..n.r m :a. no lali wmnq IX SI m= ul Nne « ? 'ala.w IIOO.IYY IXIq Im e.s ne. mx mo.«aex G ur u? ; < ! ' °'LL < `• ml e.m% In a asx piip mf^«• Im aaa n.. ul to P.. SECTION Wo., STATE r, V S ROAD ID _ o o Y - E € € S LOG BEGIN END _ '' F . gg 7 'j z o V 9 NO a « :E " F a: ? n r $ . M.P. M. P. _3 :r? S $p Sxs E e 0 A d ILL k . 2 2. ral y 6 yL q 4t d ` I?"r +YP 61'ki." S :% ?h"i'RW : }. f 1 i ?5 <<: y S Axm i.! ry OL, ^ 1 983 OILING PROGRAM EST IMATE OF COSTS 3/14 8 c ; / 3 B. HENDERSON a YM MATERIALS ESTIMATE (OIL) MC250 CMS- 2 T ?pN 5 (PRICE DELIVERED) HAOLOCK QUILCENE 43.0 T @202.40/T. 73 86.11 T T. @151.40/T $19,755.40 BRINNON 190.23 T. @14.00/T @1477 80 12,814.00 . _ 28.082.00 STANDBY TIME $36.00/HR. ESTIMATED 5 HRS. AT BRINNON $60, 0.40 pl? 1 8 180.00 $60,831.40 ROCK ESTIMATE 7/81 _ 0 5/8" - 1/4" CAPE GEORGE PIT 01 223 CY @6.00 = ? oaf 11 CAPE GEORGE PIT N2 253 CY @3.46 1,338.00 ,off , HUNTS 103 CY @2.80 DUCKABUSH 16 Cy @3.05 CAPE GEORGE 01 (BRINNON E QUILCENE) TOTALS 371 CY EQUIPMENT ESTIMATE 254 CY @7.14 875.38 2,101.96 48.80 1817 CY @10.61 19,278.37 2294 CY 23,642.51 SUB (MATERIALS) 650 84,4731 ESTIMATED DAILY PRODUCTION = 1 MILE 1 CHIP SPREADER 8 HRS. @$40.00 $ 320.00 1 "DISTRIBUTOR 8 HRS. @28.00 224.00 $.155/HR 1 ROLLER 8 HRS. @15.00 120.00 8 DUMP TRUCKS LABOR ESTIMATE 1 LEADM N 1 LEVERMAN $200.80 1 DISTRIBUTOR OPR. HR 2 CHIPPER OPR. 8 TRUCK DRIVERS 2 FLAGMEN 8 HRS. @ 9.00 576.Ou $1,240,00 @ DAY (15 DAYS) 18,600,OQ 8 HRS. @17.50 8 HRS. @17.00 8 HRS. @16.00 8 HRS. @33.00 8 HRS. @15.25 8 HRS. @6.15 MC250 PREPARATION ESTIMATE 2 GRADERS 16 HRS. @17,00 2 GRADER OPR. 16 HRS. @16.00 140.00 136.00 128.OU 264,00 976.00 98.40 $1,742.00 @ DAY (15 DAYS) a4 544.00 512.00 $1,056.00 CONTINGENCY 158 208 26,136.00 1,056.00 $130,265.91 $149,805.80 ?r i IAI??Nll` 41,411, 7.7 i? 1$Flr,kh, t ti t ? ? h ? ???t ,{A JC 4,?yF ,?y Y? '1 LI?'?jyyr{. y ,y RST?i 1 r ? { 41 yN {. r i r ? r -? L J L ? 14LR; WAC 136-11-010 PURPOSE: The laws of the state of Washington o specify in RCW 36.80.030 that the county road engineer shall have i i superv s on, under the direction of the county legislative authority , of maintainipg all county roads of the count The y. purpose of this St d an ard of Good Practice is to recognize that e majority of road R . maintenance activities can be planned scheduled and ccmplished in a r d ? °$ p e etermined manner which will result in improved economics of 0 operation, public safety and welfare and preservation of investment of county, PROVIDED, however, that this Standard of Good Practice & shall not be mandatory and shall not be considered in the issuance ' of Certificates of Good Practice. ' WAC 136-11-020 GOAL. This Standard of Good Practice is intended to encourage each county road engineer to apply basic management, princi l t 'M _ p es o road maintenance activities and to set forth specific ) goals and objectives relative to the results to be achieved. WAC 136-11 03 ?. - 0 OBJECTIVES. For the guidance and information of the engineer develo in i t p g a ma n enance management program the following objectives merit serious consid r ti e a on: (1) To provide, annually, opportunities for key personnel to receive initial training or refresher training in d the principles of maintenance management, = e ' i' (2) To develop countywide maintenance standards or levels of ? f , service or each major maintenance activity. ' (3) To develop standards of performance for individuals I/ and work crews setting forth both the quality and quantity o results anticipated. (4) To prepare an annual maintenance program for ado tio n p coincident with the annual budget and construction pro- , gram which is to identify resource requirements in terms of manpower, equipment and materials, and the cost of ` } each. (5) To schedule on an annual basis maior maintenance r ? act?.ties based on available bud eted i g ma ntenance funds so as to achieve an optimum balance of resources in the i s' ava lable time. Y - J J'h q . i ti{' ,, r STANDARDS OF WAC 136 CHAPTER 11 GOOD PRACTICE REGARDING FOR MAINTENANCE MANAGEMENT- COUNTY ROAD DEPARTMENT5 COUNTY ROAD ADMINISTRATION BOARD DATE ADOPTED 1/16/80 Pc. 2 of 2 e equipment an l l d r, (6) ong r g ate, a To develop, and annua ly up d d t t I r4,r_ men epar replacement program encompassing all major roa equipment so as to meet the equipment demands of the maintenance program. (7) To establish an information reporting system capable of compiling data needed to allow, comparison of actual d s + a Performance with established performance standards an budgetary constraints. (8) To discuss, at least biennially, with appropriate super- visory personnel the data regarding utilization of man- t l h e owes power, equipment and materials so as to assure t attainable pnit cost for each maintenance activity. 1(9) To provide adequate information to all maintenance ' ' s personnel regarding goals and objectives of the county maintenance management program. " (10) To explore and evaluate new techniques, products, equip- p ment and ideas which show promise of significantly improving performance or decreasing cost in any segment of the maintenance management effort. ry, ? ( ?X?,n t ,r Nt w?.a r?. • f7 ? ? 6 ry{1Fn?a ? ?y ?: ?C . ; ? ? ? r { -{ v MAINTENANCE MANAGEMENT b Presently: The Department of Public Works does not have a "Maintenance Management Progra nor does it have a method for measuring maintenance needs and performance. T DEVELOPMENT OF A MAINTENANCE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM: 1. Maintenance Standards - Maintenance functions categorized and defined as to frequency of operation and men and equipment required. ' 2. Maintenance Management Graph - Yearly schedule of all maintenance functions indicating seasonal priorities and required manpower. more im or- b t i t l ' 3. p u , gnmen ; ass Weekly Schedule Reports - An aid to personne ` tantly, an information reporting system for maintenance activities completed R (to be supplemented with county road maps). IMPLEMENTATION OF MAINTENANCE MANAGEMENT: After the "Maintenance Management Program" has been developed, maintenance manage- ment essentially becomes personnel management. `1 ;yx y . FUTURE DEVELOPMENT: I? n - 2 . r. 1 1. This program should be refined on a yearly basis. , R u P ., 2. Information resulting from this program should be used in conjunction with „A ER&R records to develop an annual maintenance budget. , . aL A-S B U I L T WEEKLY MAINTENANCE WEEK OF: t V S C H E D U L E PREPARED $Y; DATE: ma m CODE MAINTENANCE FUNCTION CREW MONDAY. TUESDAY WEDNESDAY THURSDAY FRIDAY SIZE ROAD, MP TO MP ROAD, MP TO MP ROAD, MP TO MP ROAD, MP TO MP ROAD, MP TO MP Y ?S e_ 1 i 77. 9" IEEE' i tt . .,..........?.. _ CODE PROJECTED WEEKLY MAINTENANCE SCHEDULE MAINTENANCE FUNCTION I CREW I MONDAY I TUESDAY SIZE ROAD, MP TO MP ROAD, MP TO MP T- I FT POTENTIAL 23 22 SUMMER HIRE 22 21 USHING U zi DAY LABOR 20 20 r- a 19 PART-TIME FLAGMEN - AS NEEDED FLAGMEN PART-TIME FLAGMEN - AS NEEDED 19 18 18 17 6?zr7dr_- ?,r. E[ /aiI I GRADE GRAVEL ROADS 17 16 GRADE GRAVEL ROADS NEW I CONSTRUCTION ¢ .Ja. 16 15 c W n W 15 14 z o¢ I I CD E c? E CD 14 13 z .+ ¢ w NEW I OILING I o° .zr = g z = 13 12 c SCREENING AND CONSTRUCTION (Mat. & Const.) o a o ° o o 12 11 cs °v STOCKPILING f I o a _ ¢ a 11 10 a ?'" ¢ 0 10 I I 9 SWEEPING 9 w 8 I I 8 EMERGENCY T REE TRIMMING CLEANING DRAINAGE EMERGENCY 6 REPAIR I I STRUCTURES REPAIR 5 W 5 I I 5 £ "- 0 4 PATCHING AND CRACK SEALING PATCHING AND CRACK SEALING 4 c 3 MACHINE MOWING 3 cm 2 MECHANICAL BRUSH CUTTING MECHANICAL BRUSH CU TTING 2 Z 1 TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES 1 JANUARY FEBRUARY MARCH APRIL MAY JUNE JULY AUGUST SEPTEMBER OCTOBER NOVEMBER DECEMBER MONTHS - 1982 Note : 1) Manpower combined from Hadlock, Quilcene and Discovery Bay NI A I N T E N A N C E M A N A G E M E N T G RAP H 2) Brinnon and West-End excluded 3) Snow and ice control overrides routine functions. /%Niv ?i_Svn.?C.= ?/Y PKOVFrfF_.v71 - Gy7FF_?q?Y OF /7t OY .V ? P??NgPl Y H6N FoR /fofT OF vR:' 1/2M7182 J . e, 4 ; S' 1;"S rt L ??. y7w Z ¢ ix MAINTENANCE STANDARDS M CODE NO. MAINTENANCE FUNCTION 542 31 OILING - CHIP SEAL . 542.31 PATCHING r 542.31 CRACK SEALING 542.31 GRADING GRAVEL ROADS 1 542.31 GRADE AND ADD MATERIAL y Yp t 542,3.} SHOULDER GRADING r' rHr 542.40 DITCHING t 542.40 CLEANING DRAINAGE STRUCTURES 542.64 TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES x ` 542.66 SNOW AND ICE CONTROL id, 542 66 STOCKPILING SAND . ? . 542.67 MACHINE SWEEPING t T'A 542.71 MACHINE MOWING 1 542.71 MECHANICAL BRUSH CUTTING ' 542.71 TREE TRIMMING ?f'Fv 546.10 SCREENING s?. SYL.V}x le4W4 ?srv-uP Ll c.?' - i. 7H iR?? S w h?'?+',?. i, c ?gn?. ry. 7? p ?l?'1? ?, x? v? [a'G, 6 x f J3yr ? ? ) ?} 'f . y rat ?l ?•' ,G ? . ? ? ? . y ? L ? 1 y ? t ` Ir •• ` '?? ? I? 4V 1 yJ yt ? 1 t - J I r f ? ?{ed ? y t l I?yyya,?? l , 1 i ?1 ,?+ ? u 4 7 H,1 ? S' 1??A `y 7 - MAINTENANCE STANDAHn OILING - CHIP SEAL CODE. 542.31 s DESCRIPTION AND PURPOSE: a•. Repair of road surface by application of liquid asphalt and crushed screenings to se l'th i a e ex sting surface and to add skid resistance. i . do^ . SCHEDULING: TYPE Of ACTIVITY : June - August Routine ` FRF7@UENCY: Every seven years for arterial roads and every ten years for access Roads CREW/EQUIPMENT ACCOMPLISHMENT Recommended Crevv She : 13 5 F Flagmen 2 Work Unlt: Road mile (22114) EqulDmeol : Dally PraduClion : 1.0 mi/day h Y ' NO. Description Average Preducilvlty:104 man-hrs./mi + - . 7 Dump Trucks, . Q " ., 1 Chip Spreader MATERIAL 1 Tack Pistributor Truck Roller I ?. GR9b?2 Liquid asphalt (Emulsion tack) Crushed 'screenings RECOMMENDED PROCEDURE 1.) Flagmen place signs and establish traffic control. _ 2.) Tack coat applied (.45 gal. CMS-7.y.) ? • t 4 L ? . 3.) Crushed screenings spread (35 lbs./S.y.) 4.) Edges raked as required, lap area kept free of chips. 7 5.) Roller compacts and(?#ooths. c? 11 HEM aS? 3'.- _=; M W W .. __ .. -- ' - r a MARITENANCE STANUACU PATCHING CODE: 542.31 DESCRIPTION AND PURPOSE: x Hand tool patching with cold mix to correct scattered potholes, ressions de d il f P ' ' . p e ge ures, or severe a a SCHEDULING : TYPE OF ACTIVITY Jan.-Aug., Sept.-Dec. / As needed Routine./ Emergency FREQUENCY: CREW/EQUIPMENT ACCOMPLISHMENT ReCOMMORdea Crew Size 2 Work Unit.' Cubic yards Egulpmeni : Dally Production : 7 z. s c.y. /6AI No. Description Average Productivity 1 Truck w/Patch King MATERIAL t S Cold mix RECOMMENDED PROCEDURE 1 ) Place signs and/or cones 2.) Clean out hole to firm base. 3.) Square edges. 4.) Apply tack coat.. 5.) Fill with cold mix. 6.) Rake smooth. 7.) Compact. MAINTENANCE STAIMARU CRACK SEALING CODE: 542.31 : . . a ` DESCRIPTION AND PURPOSE: Cleaning and filling cracks and joints w ith hot liquid asphalt (MC-250). •. -?" SCHEDULING : TYPE OF ACTIVITY : . .t Jan.-Apr., Sept.-Dec. / As needed Routine /Emergency + FREQUENCY: ,?.." CREW/EQUIPMENT ACCOMPLISHMENT Recommended Crew She : 2 Work UDlli Gallon ' Equlpmenl : Dally Production : ? K No. DescrIollon Average ProduclIyIty + 1 Dum Truck - p 1 oil Pot MATERIAL MC-250 liquid asphalt Crushed rock and/or sand RECOMMENDED PROCEDURE : l.) Place signs and/or cones. 2.) Clean cracks. 3.) Fill With MC-250. 4.) Cover with crushed material. 0 DESCRIPTION AND PURPOSE: Blading and shaping gravel roads without adding material. Remove ruts; holes, and corrugations from traveled way. SCHEDULING : TYPE OF ACTIVITY Periodic, as scheduled Routine FREQUENCY: Gravel roads should be graded 8 times per year CREW/EQUIPMENT ACCOMPLISHMENT Recommended Crew Site Work Unll: Road mile Enloment : Dally Produetion : 3 miles No. - Description r AveragePraduCllylly: 2.7 man hrs./mile 1 Motor Grader MATERIAL Mone RECOMMENDED PROCEDURE : 1.) Place signs. 2.) Double grade. 3.) Leave good crown. .. . eM,. .•. .r z . .. 'G`? .... .,. F'Y !'v('e'ktY nrr,f. .i.r_.i7.?7}Sh?.L ??iA w.al 4bJ '1? ~ d GRADE AND ADD MATERIAL CODE:':542' 31 DESCRIPTION AND PURPOSE: l roads by adding screened aggregate. TYPE OF ACTIVITY cheduled Routine erial should be added at least once every two years CHEW/EQUIPMENT ACCOMPLISHMENT Recommeflded Crew Site : 4 WOPR URII , Road mi 1 e Equipment: 03I1y PPetlnCIien: 1 mile No, OescrI0110n AueragePraducllvily: 32 man-hrs./mile 1 Motor Gradeh 3 Dump Trucks MATERIAL Screened aggregate RECOMMENDED PROCEDURE: 1.) Place signs. 2.) Trucks dump material. 3.) Grader blades and processes material. 4.) Attention should be directed to leaving a good road crown to ensure proper drainage and lessen the likelihood of potholing. h. .y O ;. -A C1, "SC'IP "N AND PURPOSE: Reshaping road shoulders by grading off grass sod and/or adding material to even up shoulders with paved surface. SCHEDULING : TYPE Of ACTIVITY ; September Routine FREQUENCY. As needed CHEW/EQUIPMENT ACCOMPLISHMENT RBCOlnnlended Crow Slte : 4 Work Unit., Shoulder mile Equipment: Bally Production: 4 miles No. Descriollon AVerageProducIIViiy: a man-hrs./mile 1 Motor Grader 3 Dump Trucks MATERIAL Screened aggregate RECOMMENDED PROCEDURE 1.) Place signs. 2.) Blade and add material as necessary . a ? . ? w I, q c t `i I' 7 r yF a J "?a?•m?,1L?`?,? ?5 C4? ??ni ? ,rd?,? ?lak?? N ° ?8? • :t i??v`? -' i 5 Y ?r ?I c a 1 PNt ?lYialrC r f ft In , .F? ? *An? ?,t ? rt r. e F. 1 '" ? 4CC°P ? a? [ r_ q t 7r1if !.: _ l r ? Iti?p ?, ? t 11M1 DITCHING CODE: 542.40 OESCHIPTION AND PURPOSE: Cleaning and reshaping roadway drainage ditches to. restore original qot•t line. =w? : y SCHEDULING : TYPE OF ACTIVITY r Oct. to Jan. Routine FREQUENCY: Ditches should'be pulled every three years CREW/EQUIPMENT ACCOMPLISHMENT ReCOmmended Crew SIZe : 8 Work UNI: Shoulder mile Flagmen As needed Equipment : Dally Production ' No. Descripllon t 2 M G d ArerageProduellylly: 12.80 man-hrs./mile o or ra ers 1 MATERIAL Belt Loader 1 Power Broom 3 Dump Trucks 1 Laborer None ` RECOMMENDED PROCEDURE : 1.) Place signs. 2.) Grader cleans and shapes ditches. 3.) Pulled material hauled to waste site. n. 4.) Shoulder bladed and/or broomed. ? 5.) Handwork done around culverts. 11 4 ! ,r l RECOMMENDED PROCEDURE I.) Visual inspection. 2.) Ilanually remove dirt and debris. 3.) Brush area. 4.) Restore marker post. 5.) If large amounts of dirt and debris need to be, removed, note location and schedule for backhoe work. • I I k; '" 1 YL ? ? T IF II F ? ?? 1 ? { 1':? 4 ?v"k 4sJ.ti '!' <YL ? k.rc=5. a I.;a ..W'J :. M y?rP+-.?,l?]rL4 F Jr r?. S.? F-U1KtS'155F. !! wr j., u? F? Prv '? ti? u? 'W? 1 ', l t r ti. 11 4 ' ? ' ? 1 ll1 S' >.?--?: ?Al 'V??.wnv S rc I . ( 1 .1 1 '' Lt ? ?i??#4 { }, ?p r 4 r ?' ? r y Y j31 t 't il '? qq ?q}p "d I^ ! S f + ?j ,. ? t ? L q i 1 r L rL yr 1fi Y ,? uwomruun Amu runruat. Repair and replace signs as needed. rw Maintain reflectors, guardrails, and intersection striping. A SCHEOULINO. TYPE OF ACTIVITY ; - € ,;„u Year-round Routine s v FREQUENCY { CREW/EQUIPMENT ACCOMPLISHMENT Recommended Crew We ? Work URIIi ! EQUIOment : Dally Produclian DescrIollon --_0 Average Productirlly pick-up MATERIAL N ? n Signs, posts, reflectors, l ?t striping•paiht, etc.. RECOMMENDED PROCEDURE ya <? s 5 tr t + h ,"ate '? ra:? , u;? .nsu ? ... rx} a?w ! $ k iS';'i l4tl*N wW a'r + f• YtL f? •? J `' ? i: r .' ? - fit r nt ,k F MAINTENANCE SHOW g SNOW AND ICE CONTROL w CODE: 542.66 E C D S RIPTION AND PURPOSE. Clearing roadway of snow, slush, or ice by plowing. ' Sanding of roadway to eliminate slippery conditions. r? w SCHEOULINO: TYPE OF ACTIVITY : F As weather necessitates Emergency zi FREQUENCY: CREW/EQUIPMENT ACCOMPLISHMENT ' 4 Recommended Crew Slze : As needed Work UnII Equlomenl: Dally Produclion; P No, Descrlpllon Average ProduclIvIly ; As needed MATERIAL » Sand ti RECOMMENDED PROCEDURE 1.) EQuip trucks with proper warning and safety devices for w travel. 2.) Plow snow or spread sand as conditions warrant. 3.) Maintain radio communications. • r "' ?imsf .. C ? ?? ??? ? F, ti?? 'kn? ,? n ?? x ?' tea "?':; ?.F ? ?'?t;?t ? „? '?' ? • pQ '? 11.1 A Y"' `'hj # 1 ?? a type p ,?, ? 1 ?, r r a3 ? V err ? ?u4d1??t}Syj r i ?? . T f ? Pi r Y J ? 1. i Y 4 "y l l ? 9 y( ?h} /11l V Vii', Mi*Y? FREQUENCY • CHEW/EQUIPMENT ACCOMPLISHMENT 46. Recommended Crew SIZe : 5 / As needed Equlpmenl : No. Description 1 Loader 4 Dump Trucks RECUMMENDEn PROCEDURE : 1.) As directed by supervisor. Work Unil°. Cubic yards Dally Procuction : ? Average Productiylly : ? MATERIAL Sand I '.b Il+ ? ? GESCNIPTION AND PURPOSE: Mechanical sweeping to remove loo se material from roadway. SCHEDULING: TYPE OF ACTIVITY ; April/ As needed Routine FREQUENCY: CREW/EQUIPMENT ACCOMPLISHMENT Recommended CPR Site : l Flagmen As needed Work URII: Shoulder mile EQUIDmeni : Dally Produclion : ? No. Oewlollon Average ProduClIVIly : ? I P e B d ow r ro m MATERIAL None RECOMMENDED PROCEDURE 1.) Place signs. 2.) Follow operators manual. a,•?a ..s.eJr r ?r L f 1• Y( f F d +G? LL RECOMMENDED PROCEDURE 1.) Place signs. 2.) Follow operator's manual. 3.) Close cut stumps with chainsaw. 4.) Salal, Oregon Grape, and Kinnikinnick are not to be mowed. 5.) Isolated clumps of Tansy Ragwort should be hand pulled and returned to shop for burning. `J DESCRIPTION AND PURPOSE: Trimming brush back along roadside. SCHEDULING : TYPE OF ACTIVITY ; Jan.-Apr., Oct.-Dec. Routine FREQUENCY: Roadside areas should be brushed once every three years CREW/EQUIPMENT ACCOMPLISHMENT Recommended Crew Slze : l Work URII' Shoulder mile EQUIPMelli Dally ProduClion: 2 miles No. Description Average ProducllvllY : 4 man-hrs./mil e 1 Tractor Mounted MATERIAL Brush Cutter 1 Chainsaw None RECOMMENDED PROCEDURE ; 1.) Place signs. 2.) Follow operator's manual. 3.) Close cut stumps with chainsaw. Remove or arrange to have removed other obstacles. 4.) Salal, Oregon Grape and Kinnikinnick'are not to'be cut back. 5.) Brush 12' back from shoulders on straight stretches. 6.) Brush 14'+ back from shoulders on curves where sight distance is critical 7.) Leave obviously ornamental trees and shrubs in populated areas unless obscuring signs or intersections. 0.) Isolated clumps of Tansy Ragwort should be hand pulled and returned to the shop for burning. ? z s i ykv .G± 5 ? ? } ? Y" 'W')v,I•Yr f A i ."fin'TW?• ? , 1 ? nY _,Y ? ' ?i rv J' r ? + xp r !ply 4 ? f ?. (,. F??f}r 1 t ojN >?? f Y , ?4YV.s_a? y,,R 1 DESCRIPTION AND PURPOSE: Trimming overhanging branches, eliminating danger trees.. . SCHEOULINO : TYPE OF ACTIVITY : Feb. - Apr. Routine FREQUENCY: Once every 10 years CREW/EQUIPMENT ACCOMPLISHMENT Recommended Craw Slte : 4 WorK UDII: Shoulder mile Equlomenl: Dally Production: 2 miles` No. Descriollon Average Productlylly: 15 man-hrs./mile 1 A i l k er a Buc et 1 Truck w/Chipper MATERIAL 2 Chainsaws Hone RECOMMENDED PROCEDURE 1.) Place signs. 2.) Down limbs, chip debris, ground saw any stumps. 3.) Crew should be prepared to do their own flagging as conditions warrant. 4.) Branches should be cut as close to joint as possible. 5.) Leave obviously ornamental trees in populated areas. x a e k k' w \J MAINTENANCE STANDA110 SCREENING CODE: 596.10 r DESCRIPTION ANG PURPOSE: ' T Producing roadway materials by screening pit run into sized aggregate. SCHEDULING: TYPE OF ACTIVITY; 4 'Y Feb. - Mar. Routine FREQUENCY: CREW/EQUIPMENT ACCOMPLISHMENT Recommended Crew Site : 4 WOPK UnII: Cubic Yard 7WA" Equipment: pally Production: ? No. Description Average Produclivliy 1 Screen Plaitt 1 Loader MATERIAL .1, 7 3 Dump Trucks t t 1` Screened aggregate: 7/8"-- 1 qll # ? ` 6a: Sand l"-- RECOMMENDED PROCEDURE 1.) As directed by supervisor. ?y w tea-? /cF?fi/?t'A'/J?J (N7Fi?.9NlIr=/?QUiCfCC4rv 7.? P ?",: F..J9??Gt1VGY /lf//N//r ?? /?IIV(J$ , Y I/E.V fo/e.,.dFe--I?tJN?v b?, ' - 1 ?G it l//1N IYIC'1 /°rSK ,YSi/K r'...?7/JC P9? <22 ir4,v -/ibPl ' ? !3{ fNOkf y.?Q ICF G.xi T/10G :.: p; - ?i9N? /82:= b'Yb •%siF.`i into f. OV6R7/1'/IF _ •• t ; " . • 3tu Ill " % ?a ' .,:. .. ArFieNGa -', ?/-?'GUr4/.cam o?4K.T/M,E' ,"? rrr ir?r.v vie ,• - . ' ,? /`!KS'AGf .427 'F? 7t - - e.i? - It. yYFRnG.£ e"'Cd66 1-tiEt.O ,_. Z3,S?t n?'24 n, Ff . . . .. , ? ,_ = 2U8?H / .?; t ' Hq.??N/lJ AiF/f H/?' •' ? _ x ? • . . . ...'.:' .y ?/sq. 'r+.Fti. // er. o?a Yom. /2 ?urJ?toa? S?PP i r,.s?• -"y er, r ,k R To7FyG - ?EQLVir64 f7,o/w>ENI1N<C- i?N?t+'/Y+'b tJ ///?%t Y$ M? ` z, IX-x I'f-IIt/ %Y P,r r(/d>,`; /°gRT-llry?'FLAIG'yyN IY.?M •1G.?//4?j'K EX»? M/SC/? AG7'. /.ve.4" I/?4lnCn t q(iILCgNF .' /d HFN CJ A'ween6/( O/C JOdbH2J?K r ? ZOJ HiIN H/e{ G ?) ? ?'h .7 / /'ry ?//ovaj ??N/a xf/.tL? /c?/t ??Ni ?o?v1'7.YLCT/vv 30YS i1A'.v 'ni[j. , YS 'k 2 Mac Aw'fw Civf7AVC7a..i ? ! r F ' ? r ? ??kse y?' ! t ?:' ,h4'?' YtS ., ?•:tt;:4 "4:i .o.:t,' 777-j i i;=4ls AMC .m .-/ r-I 'O.I Ol 00 n lp Vl P M N .-1 O 0 9NIHOlIO W .. Lo a z co a) Cl W K T U {•1 C " Z 4J ¢ p O' O N +? •?f 4 N ¢ 1VId31VW OOV ONV 30Vd9 W F ? ^ Y co 7 ;. o x U U O ? N vv N ^ l'r. o 2 ? i ?? hwn - r Z ? 9NIHOlIO ? W IVI831VW OOV ONV 30VN9 W W U S Z H c 9NIHDlIO 9NIOV89 z _Z 2 W ? Jtg C]O Q 2 m J Q Z _W J O ? g p W d. N 1 1 ? LL o a301fl HS W I. J U t-") W {?- Z N Z O N C C7 U Z _J O +? .C 0 I- U Z N U p W p W W Z Q I c?. Q g F d N O Q O C J W 3 p Z C7 C7 Q `Z., W z -i QO 1 CJ W U C CD N N IVIH31VW OOV ONV 30Va9 ONIN3110 t:7 ti W 3 N O Z H W? w w b: M N ;z O 0n 1 CO f? l0 to V M N r O Ot Op I? tD to a M N '- N N, -N r 3WI1 121Vd ^ 3WI1 '1inj 0 in u N3W j0 N30Wf1N W V Q Z W Z Q uk? ?ry rc j c aNor", (Syf? i ( ?` 7? 7 LFn?t Si?A? ? ?'T ?y Wt _.` O m > ,:?ri n Z O Z X E v o ? 6 NV Y r7 z U 4- M C O h N z v > i .II- .h w m •? > °u : G rt ? -s d. O I- 0 • 3 IA E U a ?. ,1 1 O V r C^ O ? L p ' O U o roc 4- arc•<,, ? , W .--• N M h O N xTj . I ' ? C J -r W ? U fJ r. ? ?j z i- W ? ?d x W > U' 7 a ;N i _J d Q G7 Z a 2 In 41 ? la! _ N ,Ui U C iY.1 U W o U ? p Z m ~ , Q O 4 O U O Z Z H W V W LL V- U d co z ? a ? Cz? Q .AE 1 LL 4 d Q r k U) a. . W KF 'inn, r tgtJ 2 r w 3 a A r H ? A : w 7 uj ' 3 A J. 1( "T . Q a f S C/) CD W Z a E U O f ? Z G q J ¢ ? -? W ? 1- 3 W ? W N Z N ..r U N ?C U J ~ ? Y Z , LAJ W W 3 z z ^'i w J W F A gW w ?? ? ? ?: ? ys tyA •? R,r"rA'u??f V y1.+u 4` ??y..dr.?1h? ?- ? if i{ rL?, 1 hz:. W lL W O w 4 W W W F- 3 a q J ? S W S ? ca w F- W f, C d w U Z Q Z W H Z ' 4 E J Y W w 3 0 4kA F 2, 1 t S rt+,?,s, k . ?: - r ii z L { e ?r 4) Nek } F A a. K W Q O CL ~ A N d ? O 1--' a O A F- N z?: Q 3 O a O h E w 0 ~ Q O m a S C) > a a o ? A O K W N z u N 2 O V Z ' U W W z z w F- W L1 I O C1 }; COUNTY OF KING ) STATE OF WASHINGTON ) The papers and documents appearing on t by your affiant and that said papers and copies of the originals thereof as the s custody of the Jefferson County Clerk. nr and documents as aforesaid was done in t t; H ,I IL M ?f? 1 kv [CATE Y is roll of film were photographed ti documents are true and correct n ame appeared on record in the The microfilming of the papers ? r he pursuance of, and in conform- h u? ante with provisions of the statutes in these cases made and provided x1141 for as they appear in Title 40, of the Revised Code of Washington. I, the undersigned, do hereby certify, under penalty of perjury, that the above statement is true and correct. ty L--Vgnatii a Date Northwest Center Industries Micrographics Department