Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutReel_0026A err ' MICROFILM is CERTIFICATE COUNTY OF KING ) i STATE OF WASHINGTON ) E 3 The papers and documents appearing on this roll of film were photographed by your affiant and that said papers and documents are true and correct copies of the originals thereof as the same appeared on record in the custody of the Jefferson County Clerk. The microfilming of the papers and documents as aforesaid was done in the pursuance of, and in conform- ance with provisions of the statutes in these cases made and provided for as they appear in Title 40, of the Revised Code of Washington. 'o o - „I I, the undersigned, do hereby certify, under penalty of perjury, that i I the above statement is true and correct. ? w - Signaturbj ?J Date Northwest Center Industries Micrographics Department t r{ f 1 Maintenance Management - ern Q r--:7 ?- ? h 5' M ENANC a' nv..s ,,..xnw,n.e..^.?R^'M_+3S1.9dYT'§-^r' ,!tW..:. 15, l ,;I ti74iYr, OW, wintan.rn<e Cust Eslimatc • ANNUAL ULU -l;ltL ?S?i- rI'FE- FREQYr;tlA. TASK ACTIVITY COSTLTB MILc PER h11LE CYCLE M1 LT MILE 10. $,,I C." (BST RO+tls) I1. 314Plant Mi. Serl IACP Rwds) 12. Pr eY+iWn forarrrliv(a I Rh,eta¢9"Igr<11 " 0 A7• •• /[l _? 10. P+ICnIn56 Lere8ng- '" a. Hot Mi. Pitch 4eq b. Cold MI, Patch c. Ski, Patching (hit d nla chip will UL d. cucY Sc+nng f1?B S 35/ e. full Deptll patch /07 A 5-- PAVED sc r.n,ian+rN(w settlement repair '7T _ '37 ROADWAY SURFACES 11, 1.1"p-d shpulden- I I. Gradlnta5h+ping b. Sddlny.11.0 A; _.. ? 03 0.125 ( 6 16, Mee',mlen +reePinga npYning ? Z 12, M+nu+l sr ego lnlerucl Wn, b.Sec, id+nJS, ele, // W L 1 0 18. Spring ch-P _ _ . _ PAVED ROADWAY SURFACES ANNUAL COST = 20. Grading 12.0 Ava UNPAVED 2t. Adding Aggrpg+te(7"depth) 22 Dust Oting (pelmleum a ehemleal) _ 0.125 1 0 A//R .11A ROADWAY . _ SURFACES 27 ErvsWn1M/or settlement repair /Y//J UNPAVED ROADWAY SURFACES ANNUAL COST= " 75. H7®culvar mYYS Yswlr ?r4 SurYt7 7a. Ge+n <ulwt no, 70 AL(f .Z 1.0 2.0 70 If A 11 27. C111 In C.B., M.12., D.W. 30Y I 1.0 30y DRAINAGE 28 Cleanarepaircksetl+YStemslnel.eJrenVWe SOB ( log 29. H-dltahing /e/0o S 0.2 980 30. DBching. Motor Grader (Incl.nuW^g) /3/.2 n _? 0.32 q( 7 M DRAINAGE ANNUAL COST= g (-- CONI'gOL And 72. E.spenJlturn huhisiln,t-tlme(tabor SNOW & ICE eyulls'n- d m+ler4lsl Ipihe p- 10 cm y- + tVIb-bl, Ip soar 6 Ice rol. Dor InUuJe sc., cle+nup.y8i' 0.1 SNOW AND ICE CONTROL ANNUAL COST I rl- _ w ,,• fir;: ; .: ?e'te" , - 01-D i ?. ? u k I IY l f F 1 i 1 i 'LL'U•:IT - LIFC_'-. h,:L? 't".UAt'tCST ACTIVITY OST/Jntl MIIF PER MILE CYCLE MULF . MILE ' Mow______ 77 77 1.0 . . I.0 11. MuwinA riAhtasl w-V 1.0 ]S. Cheml,-1 Veget-tbn control ol . W N I d C l 76 ?t ROAOSIOE MAINT. ee un .: e r . 17. Sid walY,, Uk7cle J'Ah, Tlalh- . re,url-cing + 0.07 ., . patching - b e . . c. tIgnlnX d de11ne-0.r, 0. 'weeping 7.0 ROADSIDE MAINTENANCE ANNUAL COST= 73. Sig a. 7.0 InsOeclbn and palpl "v a I t °s g `e R,wt densd P111(-dell-4 attkentl) • d, ReP1.1. alln,d pall, 1 11 1 l 0.11 ace , - 0f e. R.D+Nar rep 79. Marklm- OS CentMine d ?an. tWPing 1.0 .0 _ 2.0 - b, Edgellne frlping. Rurd 0.5 1.0 Id-nd, GDR d sDeckl tldDlne Incl e 05 TRAFFIC . . 1.0 CONTROL bar a cros-1, m l+ - sto 1` 1 d 1.0 DEVICES , p 1 ea ge, . M Replace lane marker, and buttons e . 40. SISn.1,.nd1.11hting- =•0 RelamP tl8nai t, Intpeet and 1,041 -miller Z-0 . R,P.lrlgn.1 head d R l . o ... W., Rep+N detector (ImPt Dr pad,) 1. P-.,4 chary.•annual 1.0 41. GuWraO- ll d 0.7 a. Palm gu,,dn pnu. Rep-It of npl+ce guardnll b . e. R11111 11,111, cult, ("C" curb, _ - W,,J,, NI bard., etc.) - TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES ANNUAL COST= 3 - 1 -- - - ' - ?}? ;f "F ?ITt r, •, , - s " - , TOTAL ANNUAL MAINTENANCE COST = I DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPO STATE AID ORGANIZATION i 1 I COUNTY GAS TAX INDEPEN ANNUAL MAINTENAN Item d 28 Acti EQUIPMENT COSTS NO. TYPE 1 Pickup Truck f v " LABOR COSTS NO. CLASSIFICATION 2 Laborers I , MATERIAL COSTS p QUANTITY UNIT None ; Form No. Pending 4/83 j i 14:StAd1 1 __ ....., I ink .. I? i RTATION 6/1/83 Calculatior, Hate Checked By wr Date 1,- ?-: _ Q7 DENT COST ESTIMATE E COSTS Glean & .Repair E vity Closed Drain Systems Cost Detail Sheet. g s X HOURLY RATE X SHIFT = EXTENSION c 5.00 8 1&;5;: 40.00 E f TOTAL EQUIPMENT COST $ 40.00 X HOURLY RATE X SHIFT = EXTENSION 11.00 8 176.00 ?j TOTAL LABOR COSTS $ 176.00 I DESCRIPTION X UNIT COST - EXTMlV 10?1 { TOTAL MATERIAL COSTS -0- Second Page MC i3-28 i t C ?i Fit Zx?ai m .r w L? ?i WSDOT - STATE AID ORGANIZATION Date 6 - _ From Desk of:F., ANNUAL MAINTENANCE COSTS (County Gas Tax-Independent Cost Estimate) Item / WORK ACTIVITY, l /scrn, g A w ,MAT. CAT ?lC+o?./ 1/ in t7FiuJ Urban Rural /l F/C Basic Production Miles per day ? FACTORS THAT LIMIT PRODUCTION (UNIT PER DAY) Life Cycle, Side Work Approaches, Appurtenances Miles Lost Frequency 2 Years Extent of Work Each Mile Miles Lost Severity of Defects Miles Lost Lost Time (Emergency, Long Haul) Miles Lost _ Basic Production _-_ Traffic (Flagging, Detours) Miles Lost Less Lost Miles Other Than Above Miles Lost ' = Adjusted Production Z Miles per Day JOB COSTS PER DAY (See Reverse Side) Equipment Costs: $ ,/0 Labor Costs: $ 17(0 Material Costs: $ - 0 - Total = $_ 0Z/& = Total Cast per Job Mile Adj. Production 9_ Cost per Job Mile _ 1W _ per mile Frequency ANNUAL COST $ /GO per mile Supporting Calculations: / / ,45su,fl. 10t'- oNe ??? Ie of cl0,d .sXko ea mile otYaay ,?f- r4 if yT41,// ai/ Z' P: Calculated By Date Maintenance Category Reviewed By Date Activity tiP T3/J0! Page / ---- i ?.h sasiu? j i .r ?J f COUNTY GAS TAX INDEPENDENT COST ESTIMATE. ANNUAL MAINTENANCE COSTS Item A 13-27 _ Act;v;iy'"Cigatr'Ca"tch Basins 1 EQUIPMENT COSTS NO. TYPE X HOURLY RATE 5.00 28.00 "y Cost Detail Sheet X SHIFT = EXTENSION 8 40.00 8 224.00 TOTAL EQUIPMENT COST J _I64..00 rmu. CLASSIFICATION X HOURLY RATE 11.00 13.00 X SHIFT = EXTENSION 8 88.00 8 104.00 TOTAL LABOR COSTS ` 19a 2.00 DESCRIPTION X UNIT COST = EXTENSION NONE N E 1 y who WSDOT - STATE P.ID ORGANIZATION Date From Desk of: - 1 i ANNUAL MAI'VTEN ANCE COSTS , (County Gas Tax-independent Cost Estimate) i Item #97 WORK ACTIV)SY r? ?"' _ ? o ` Urban RMAT. CAT /yam al F/c K 1 Grp,- Basic Production per day / Miles G F FACTORS THAT LIMIT PRODUCTION (UNIT PER DAY) Life Cycle, Side Work Approad es, Appurtenances Miles Lost F p requency Years Extent of Work Each Mile Miles Lost Severity of Defects Miles Lost - Lost Time (Emergency, Long Haul) Miles Lost - Traffic (Flagging, Detours) Basic Production /S- Other Than Above Miles Lost - Less Lost Miles Miles Lost _ = Adjusted Production /„S Miles per Day JOB COSTS PER DAY (See Reverse Side) Equipment Costs: $ oZ6I ' Labor Costs: Material Costs: $ . 1 Total = $ ?S6 =Total Cost $ 3OS/ ¢ Adj. Production . _r per Job Mile Cost per job Mile '113d y _ per mile Frequency / ANNUAL COST S? _ per mile p Sup o ti C { PQ? - p r ng a culations: 6 d l ? / /7-.ft'GaaFTlok6 ; SP4c/ 47' aOa/s,wv 14' J 1 X ,2 s?i/rs. %3 /LC uc? rl4oi6c Cf"hs-D /°e?k -Ile 61- 17 Per r.., le ?ew: l l PaNiiul Vale IJ cZf^pea dpJ oti aS`+i _ / J iy/?/c,?ri Calculated By DDaate Maintenance Category # Activity # rJ i Wr T3/101Page # ?. al ?Y '41` DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STATE AID ORGANIZATION Calculation Date S-v-gg Checked By ?M Date e _ COUNTY GAS TAX INDEPENDENT COST ESTIMATE ANNUAL MAINTENANCE COSTS t . Item # 18 Activity Spring Cleanup Cost Detail Sheet. u EQUIPMENT COSTS NO. TYPE Y HOURLY RATE X SHIFT = EXTENSION 1 Truct? :1OCY Dump 25.00 8 200.00 1 Pickup", 5 00 R . 8 40.00 :as?xa TOTAL EQUIPMENT COST 3 240.00 LABOR COSTS NO. CLASSIFICATION X HOURLY RATE X SHIFT = EXTENSION 1 Truck Driver, Dump 13.00 8,, 104.00 4 Laborers 11 00 . 8 352.00 TOTAL LABOR COSTS 456.00 ( MATERIAL COSTS jj QUANTITY UNIT DESCRIPTION X UNIT COST = EXTENSION i NONE , < . t 1 J ?a, TOTAL MATERIAL COSTS $ -0- Form No. Pending 1iJ83 Second Page MC 5-18 14:StAdl , i - L? s , annual maintenance costs spring clean up Q DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ? STATE AID ORGANIZATION Calculation Date 5/3/83 Checked BY ?,r Date L. - "_sl?. COUNTY GAS TAX INDEPENDENT COST ESTIMATE ? ANNUAL MAINTENANCE COSTS i Item # 17 ( !- Activity Manual Sweepi Cost Detail Sheet I EQUIPMENT COSTS NO. TYPE X HOURLY RATE X SHIFT = EXTENSION j 1 Pickup Truck 5.00 ' 8 40.00 6 t TOTAL EQUIPMENT COST $ 40.00 LABOR COSTS NO. CLASSIFICATION X HOURLY RATE X SHIFT = EXTENSION 1 Laborer 11.00 8 88.00 { TOTAL LABOR COSTS 88.00 ?- MATERIAL COSTS QUANTITY UNIT DESCRIPTION X UNIT COST v= EXTENSION ' NONE fq, 11 j TOTAL MATERIAL COSTS $ -0- Forcer No. Pending 4/83 Second page MC 14-17 14:StAd1 G 4D is aS . Annual Maintenance costs Manual Supplling DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STATE AID ORGANIZATION Calculation Date 4/22/83 tZ Checked By _ Jt1--- Date i, - Nn . (6- COUNTY GAS TAX INDEPENDENT COST ESTIMATN, '?`-`` ANNUAL MAINTENANCE COSTS Item I/ 16 Activity Mechanical 5weepin,9 Cost Detail Sheet EQUIPMENT COSTS - NO. TYPE X HOURLY „ATE X SHIFT = EXTENSION 1 Street Sweeper Truck 32.00 8 256.00 1 Flush trunk 23.00 8 184.00 y: - I .:; TOTAL EQUIPMENT COST $ 440.00 _ - - LABOR COSTS j I I 1 NO. CLASSIFICATION X HOURLY RATE X SHIFT = EX TENSION I 1 Operator Sweeper 13.00 8 104.00 I 1 Operator Flush Truck 13.00 8 104.00 11 II I i TOTAL LABOR COSTS $ 208.00 ? MATERIAL COSTS QUANTITY UNIT DESCRIPTION X UNIT COST = EXTENSION ! Water - free Disposal site - free mod' l , i :TOTAL. MATERIAL COSTS $ -0- Form No. Pending 4/83 Second page MC 15-16 14:StAdI I, it i I l^'s, v ANNUAL MAtNTGNAN?:L COSTS ! (County Gas Tax-Independent Cost Estimate) I I Item a WORK AC7 / MAT. CAT S` k Urban Rural F/C c11 ?i ' Basic ProduG,?ion per day Miles . FACTORS THAT LIMIT PRODUCTION (UNIT PER DAY) Life Cycle, Si urtenances Miles Lost - Frequency Years de Work Approaches, App I t' _ Extent of Work Each Mile Miles Lost f Severity of Defects Miles Lost Lost Time (Emergency, Long Haul) Miles Lost Basic Production Traffic (Flagging, Detours) :ales iASi Less Lost Miles Otl-er Than Above Miles Lost = Adjusted Production _L_ Miles per Day JOB COSTS PER DAY (See Reverse Side) Equipment tgsts: $ ?f y0 ss Labor costs: $ 02 0? Material Costs: $ 0 °. Total = $ 6 yp =Total Cost $ per Job Mile, Adj, Production _ per mile Cost per Job Mile - '" Frequency` ANNUAL COSTper mi!< Supporting Calculations: - 011 - Date y-L2-dy Maintenance Category Calculated By Reviewed By Date Activity o T3/101 Pail tD x ti _ t r ri DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STATE AID ORGANIZATION Calculation Date _4/22/83 -. Checked By __ Date COUNTY GAS TAX INDEPENDENT COST ESTIMATE ANNUAL MAINTENANCE COSTS Item # 15(b) Activity Shoulder. add mall- Cost Detail Sheet EQUIPMENT COSTS NO. TYPE X HOURLY RATE X SLIIFT = EXTENSION 1 Truck, 10 CY Dump 25.00 2 $50 per load I? i ? TOTAL EQUIPMENT COST j 50.00 per load 7 LABOR COSTS NO. CLASSIFICATION X HOURLY RATE X SHIFT = EXTENSION) 1 Truck Driver, Dump 13.00 2 $26 per load i i TOTAL LABOR COSTS $ 26.00 Per load MATERIAL COSTS QUANTITY UNIT DESCRIPTION X UNIT COST = EXTENSION 10 CY or 18 Ton Shoulder gravel CSTC 5.00 $90 per load TOTAL MATERIAL COSTS 90 per load Form No. Pei-Wing 4/83 Second Page MC 5-15(b) I &F 14:SLAdI ti 4q Item # ?S l?l WORK ACTIVITXj ?/ MAT. CAT srd h Q? R nu(? Ub, )h F/C ccoxs 917- Basic Production per day 3 Miles FACTORS TIiAT LIMIT PRODUCTION (UNIT PER DAY) Life Cycle, Side Work Approaches, Appurtenances Miles Lost Frequency Years Extent of Work Each Mile Miles Lost Severity of Defects Miles Lost Last Time (Emergency, Long Haul) Miles Lost Basic Production 3 Traffic (Flagging, Detours) Miles Lost Less Lost Miles O f Other Than Above Miles Lost - Adjusted Production 3 Miles per Day gym: ; JOB COSTS PER DAY (See Reverse Side) Equipment Costs: $ Labor Costs: rel• low Ei Material Costs: $ Q Total = $ j 46P Pt, load, = Total cost $ /k- per Job Mile Adj. Production Cost per Job Mile X os h+i = ?/? per mile // Frequency llk etn, 4""Ir ANNUAL COST $ per mile -.6 q Supporting Calculations: fy'SSUneI¢ LO0Uh Lvld4 it 2?X /.S7al7 e/.S - Hq4 In oN 2 ? a S?Ju x ?tiP .?X r ?Z ? /?2 o s? hr P4? ???- _ Z loQ _JYr '? yP ?.r:?.,r+h 13?a s?.Tt - _ N7x A IrC.y1, A,,, 9 ? ' n = I??fei??llo?4 Id Cy. d&phA .. Calculated By Date y_ z z -B 3 Maintenance Category # 7 // /3> Reviewed By Date _ Activity # T3/101 Page # Cs? . --- - LT rr?; MATERIAL COSTS r. QUANTITY UNIT DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STATE AID ORGANIZATION Calculation Date 4122 Checked By ?t?. Date _ ?_ g3 COUNTY GAS TAX INDEPENDENT COST ESTIMATE <yj ANNUAL MAINTENANCE COSTS >j (0. Itemd 15(a) Activity Shoulder Grading__ CostDetailSheet EQUIPMENT COSTS NO. TYPE X HOURLY RATE X SHIFT = EXTENSION 1cai 1 Grader 21.00 8 168.00 1 Pickup Truck 5.00 8 40.00 ?a TOTAL EQUIPMENT COST 208.00 ?_ LABOR COSTS NO,. CLASSIFICATION X HOURLY RATE X SI+.SFT = EXTENSION) 1 Operator, Grader 13.00 8 104.00 1 Flagman 12.00 8 96.00 TOTAL `LABOR COSTS $ 200.00 DESCRIPTION X UNIT COST = EXTENSION Material necessary will be included as item #15(b) TOTAL MATERIAL COSTS $ -0- Form No. Pending 4/93 14:StAdi b { Item _ WORK ACTIV T{ ?? Urban R ral CAT r- wJ ; 7 Jhe LAP ;I FIC cress e = Basic Production per day a3 Miles 617- FACTORS THAT LIMIT PRODUCTION Side Work (Approacixs, Appurtenances) Extent of Work Each Mile Severity of Defects Lost Time (Emergency, Long Haut) Traffic (Flagging, Detours) Other Than Above (UNIT PER DAY) Life Cycle, Miles Lost - Frequency Z Years - Miles Lost Miles Lost i Miley Lost _ Basic Production Miles Lost - Less Lost Miles Miles Lost = Adjusted Production 3 Miles per Day JOB COSTS PER DAY (See Reverse Side) Equipment Costi: $ a0? Labor Costs: $ 05200 Material Costs: $ -O- Total = $ yd = Total Cost $ /3C per Job Mile Adj. Production Cost per Job, Mile Frequency Supporting Calculations: per mile ANNUAL COST $ per mile Calculated By _ Date q- 2-7 -P3 Reviewed By Date i T31101 Page i e 0-1 0 0 771 f DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STATE AID ORGANIZATION Calculation Date 4/20/83 ' Checked By. JM Date TiJl'lTO i COUNTY GAS TAX INDEPENDENT COST ESTIMATE ' ANNUAL MAINTENANCE COSTS Item !i 14 L Activity Erosion Control Cost Detail Sheet i EQUIPMENT COSTS i NO. TYPE X HOURLY RATE X SHIFT = EXTENSION 1. Loader w/backhoe 32.00 8 256 00 P 2. Grader 21.00 8 3. Trucks, 10 C.Y. Dumps 25 00 8 . 168.00 . 1. Pheumatic Roller or 600.00 VitratorY 12.00 a 40 Pickup Trucks C 00 8 48.00 . 1. Power Broom a 32.00 4 160.00 128.00 TOTAL EQUIPMENT COST J2,360 LABOR COSTS NO. CLA5S!FICATION X HOURLY RATE X SHIFT =EXTENSION 1 Operator,backhoe/loader 13.00• 8 104 00 1 7 1 Operator,grader 13.00 8 . 104 00 3 Truck drivers,dump 13.00 8 . 312 00 112 Operator,roller/compactor 13.00 4 . 52 00* 10 Laborers,flagmen 12.00 8 . 960 00 ? 112 Power Broom Operator 13.00 q . 52.00* I *Same person TOTAL LABOR COSTS $1,584 MATERIAL COSTS o QUANTITY UNIT DESCRIPTION X UNIT COST = EXTENSION . 100 C.Y. Borrow backfull 6.00 100 Ton 600.00 p, Crushed,stone top course 8.00 ' 1 MGAL 800.00 Water 30.00 30.00 ati x i TOTAL MATERIAL COSTS 1 ,430 rs 4 Form No. Pending 4/83 Second Pa MC 5"14 14:StAdl ge t c°? 440 V•" Y?? '?P.4EIY4t:syC¢.??it?ti:80L."G' R'p(?'°e'n' 1' f ,. U1v Ba F[Oli ANNUA L MAINTENANCE COSTS (County Gas Tax-Independ t C en ost Estimate) i t :tem -L_ WORK ACTIVITY -t?dl/Dr(/ /1dC MAT. CAT r Urb R + an ural ,?L? Basic Production per day S Miles (.1.41 /.4 F/ 6?1u eL c FACTORS THAT LIMIT PRODUCTION Side Work Approaches, Appurtenances (UNIT PER DAY) Life Cycle, i Extent of Work Each Mile Miles Lost Frequency _i;2-- Years Severity of Defects r> Miles Lost t Lost Time (Emergency, Long Naul) Miles Lost Traffic (Flagging, Detours] Miles Lost _ Basic Production S-6 ill Other Than Above Miles Lost= = Miles Less Lost Miles - Lost = Adjusted Production S-D Miles per Day JOB COSTS PER DAY (See R V everse Side) - ? Equip;S ent Costs: $ /3Ga j 11 Labor Costs: $L S y Material Costs: $ ??130 I " f Total = $ = Total Cost pq Adj. Production p per Job Mile Cost per Job Mile ?_ - ? ? Frequency per mie a ANNUAL COST Per mile i "t PPor: ng - Calculations: // EK?PNT L!<s!/?e? - .. ' / ,,f? ?y ?SScJS?t So{-4'?l"' ? ?t4"KPP, (""'I<1(C o `,. Calculated By _ Hof -- Date RevleweBy 7 Maintenance Cate Date gory i ??/ C rnf 1'"? f Activity i T3/101 Page G 2 I DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPO)&TATION STATE AID ORG ^I ZATION Calculation Data 4/79/83 Checked By Jc? Date COUNTY GAS TAX INDEPENDENT COST ESTIMATE. ANNUAL MAINTENANCE COSTS Item /t 13(e) Activity Full_Depth IT Patch Cost Detae! Sheet EQUIPMENT COSTS NO. TYPE X HOURLY RATE X SHIFT = EXTENSION 1 2 Trucks, IOCY,Dump 43 25.00 8 400 00 1 Distributor Truck 28.00 8 1/2 Rolle . 224.00 1 r 12.00 4 3 Pickup Trucks 5.00 8 48.00 120 00 j 112 Spreader Box 28.00 4 . 112.00 C f ?. Q os t TOTAL..EQUIPMENT COS ?...? T $904.00 . LABOR COSTS . NO. CLASSIFICATION X HOURLY RATE X SHIFT = EXTENSION r 2 Dump Truck Drivers t, 13.00 8 208 00 "t I Distributor Operator 13.00 8 . 104 00 f 112 Roller Operator 13.00 4 . 52 00 + 3 Laborers, Flagmen 11.00 8 . 264 00 f 112 Spreader Box Operator 13.00 4 . 52 004 s'. rr . TOTAL LABOR COSTS $ 680.00 ° MATERIAL COSTS QUANTITY UNIT DESCRIPTION X UNIT COST = EXTENSIO4 70 Ton Asphalt Mik' 50.00 3 500 00 1 Ton Liquid Tac & BIT , . Seal Emulsion, 250.00 250.00 4„ { e TOTAL MATERIAL COSTS $ 3,750.00 ?? Form No. Pending 4/3j Second 14:StAd1 Page MC 5-13(e) ? m es - - ------------ d o?w? Aft " i Om ro?a` i n ? ANNUAL MAINTEN,tANCE COSTS ? (County Gas Tax-Independent Cost Estimate) pfJYG item G WORK ACTIV Li??7= MAT. CAT S ?- UGL ?r D7G? Urban Rural 1 F/C f.. u _ ? So e7 PIC /C B l es Mi asic Production per day J FACTORS THAT LIMIT PRODUCTION (UNIT PER DAY) Life Cycle' Side Work Approaches, ApPurter:ances, Miles Lost Frequency Years 4- Extent of Work Each We Miles Lost Severity of Defects: Miles Lost - Lost Time (Emergency, Long Haul) /h•? Miles Lost Basic Production SO Traffic (Flagging, Detours) Miles Lost - Less Lost Miles D Miles Lost - Other Than bove = Adjusted Production S Q Miles per Day JOB COSTS PER DAY (See Reverse Side) Equipment Costs: $ 9o y Labor Costs: $_ P 1 $ ? 7(? Gr Material Cow ? Total = 5 S33'/ = Total Cost $ /07 per Job Mile Adi. Production ? 0 L -Y Cost per Job Mile r e j Frequency 7 ANNUAL COST r ffdk 11 ?/ Supporting Calculations-. N 7 fn <CCN? Zlhf/f/- A50 s-a-Ffof' 2 CQ NC?G?C'CCrtKI 44Y/NrM -? ... ? P - lt/i ?kI ?S lY. ? i ar sl,.a t, 7 0 S Y P3 Maintenance Categ Calculated By Date Y- /4- ZIP ?' p 3 C! cd avg. o+ Reviewed By Date i rw 06 iu Act:vity? - y T3/101 Page ? i r 1 PARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 4/18/83 Calculation Date 1TE AID ORGANIZATION Checked By arM Date UNTY GAS TAX INDEPENDENT COST ESTIMATE ANNUAL MAINTENANCE COSTS n # 13(d) Activity 'C'r'ack* . Sealing Cost Detail Sheet " t EQUIPMENT COSTS TYPE X HOURLY RATE X SHIFT f = EXTENSION Truck, Dump, IOCY 25.00 8 400.00 i Air Compressor (500 CFM) 7.00 8 56.00 Distributor Truck Hand Sniveys 28.00 8 224.00 Pickup Trucks 5.00 8 80.00 Q TOTAL EQUIPMENT COST $ 760.00 LABOR COSTS NO. CLASSIFICATION X HOURLY RATE 2 Truck Drivars, Dump 13.00 1 Operator, Distributor 13.00 6 Laborers, Flagmen 11.00 MATERIAL COSTS TITY UNIT Ton I Ton X SHIFT 8 8 8 i = EXTENSION 208.00 104.00 528.00 Q. I { TOTAL LABOR COSTS DESCRIPTION Asphalt Cement Tack j 840.00 X UNIT COST = EXTENSION 200.00 1,400.00 250.00 25.00 $1,425.00 I 0 TOTAL MATERIAL COSTS m No Pending 4/83 rss xSec:ond Page MC 5 -13 (d) w' Annual maintenance costs crack sealing { nEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION > STATE AID ORGANIZATION Calculation Date 4/18/83 p Checked By JM Date - _ B3 j COUNTY GAS TAX INDEPENDENT COST ESTIMATE r ANNUAL MAINTENANCE COSTS Ski P t 1 h(Sk i i C i D il Sh )Z a 3(c) Act c v ty ip Sealing) Item C c st eta eet EQUIPMENT COSTS NO. TYPE X HOURLY RATE X SHIFT = EXTENSION I i 1 Motor Patrol Graderi t 10 ton 21.00 8 168.00 1 Distributor Truck W/heater (1,000 gal) 28YDQ 8 '224.00 1 Roller 8-11 ton 12100 8 96.00 , 8 Trucks, 10 CY, Dumps 25.00 8 1600.00 is I Truck, Water (],COD gal) 20.00 8 160.00 4 Pickup Trucks 5.00 8 160.00 TOTAL EQUIPMENT COST $ 2,408.00 LABOR COSTS NO. CLASSIFICATION X HOURLY RATE X SHIFT = EXTENSION 1 Operator, Grader 13.00 8 104.00 1 Operator, DistributdtrM 13.00 8 104.00 ! 8 Truck Drivers, Dump 13.00 8 832.00 1 Operator, Roller 12.00 8 96.00 4-1 Tanker Driver 12.00 8 96.00 4 Laborers, Flagmen 11.00 8 352.00 C_ . 777 40 P . . TOTAL LABOR COSTS $ 1,584.00 - 1 ' MATERIAL COSTS QUANTITY UNIT DESCRIPTION X UNIT COST = EXTENSION 20 Ton Liquid BIT Seal 250.00 5,000.00 200 CY Aggregate 8.00 1,600.00 - Gal Water 'free' -0- TOTAL MATERIAL COSTS $ 6,600.00 Form No. Pending 4/83 Secord Page MC 5-13(c) 14 StAdl , e"" Ci?y ANNUAL MAINTENANCE COSTS (Co G unty., as Tax-lndependent Cost Estimate) a: Item ? (c WORK ACTIVITY ,54h / MAT. CAI' A- 4<6 - Urban Rural \S " F/C Q Basic Production per day 4P Miles t - FACTORS THAT LIMIT PRODUCTION (UNIT PER DAY) Life Cycle, _ Side work Approaches, Appurtenances Mil L ? es ost - Frequency S Years Extent of Work Each Mile Miles Lost - ' ! V Severity of Defects Miles Lost Lost Time (Emergency, Long Haul) Miles Lost Basic Production Traffic (Flagging Detours) V , Miles Lost - Less Lost Miles Other Than Above Miles Lost w = Adjusted Production AP' Miles per Day JOB COSTS PER DAY (See Reverse Side) Equipment Costs: `y0 o? yd?'', Labor Costs: $ / ?Y Material Costs: $ 1, C0? f Total =Total Cost Adj. Production 5 Per lob Mile { Cost per Job Mile _ - /L- per mile Frequency ANNUAL COST ?11r- per mile §!?Rportina Calculations: { 1 i • Calculated By j? Date Maintenance Category / f Reviewed By Data t Activity # T3/101 Page # a . :LF ?AIIC! ' "`DEPARTMENT OF TRANSP STATE AID ORGANIZATIOI i COUNTY GAS TAX INDEPE i ANNUAL MAINTENAI I item # 13(b) Ac G EQUIPMENT COSTS ' NO. TYPE 1 Truck, 10 CY,Dump 1 Truck, Pickup LABOR COSTS ' NO. CLASSIFICATION 1 Truck Driver 4 Laborers f MATERIAL COSTS •' { QUANTITY UNIT j 6 Tons 1/100 Ton Form No. Pending 4/83 14:StAd1 tv )RTATION Calculation Date 4/15/83 Checked By Date _ - ?n• sa, _ y 4DENT COST ESTIMATE CE COSTS ivity Cold BIT Patch Cost Detail Sheet j X HOURLY RATE X SHIFT = EXTENSION 25.00 8 200.00 5.00 8 40.00 TOTAL EQUIPMENT COST $ 240.00 X HOURLY RATE X SHIFT = EXTENSION 13.00 8 104.00 11.00 8 352.00 r TOTAL LABOR COSTS 456.00 _- DESCRIPTION X UNIT COST = EXTENSION J Cold BIT Mix 20.00 120.00 Tack-Asphalt Cement 150.00 2.00 TOTAL MATERIAL COSTS $ 122.00 Second Page MC 5-13(b) i O J , .. 1W i I I Item W T, Basic Production p FACTORSTHATI Side Work A roa V Extent of Work Ea S i f D f ever ty o e ect Lost Time (Emerge y Traffic (Flagging,I Other Than Above J JOB COSTS PER D 1 Equipment CI I Labor Costs: _ Material Cost v Total = $ Adj. Production _ „( Cost per Sob I I Frequency a Stu forting Calculat JN. k.idz a9 /. y -Y X. j ?µi?FTcN? .7 l7rP?i of $17 ew Calculated By _ Reviewed By _ T3/101 r r DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Calculation Date 4/13/83 STATE AID ORGANIZATION - --- Checked By _ JM _ Date y. ?-i -83 - COUNTY GAS TAX INDEPENDENT COST ESTIMATE ANNUAL MAINTENANCE COSTS item # Activity Hot Mix BIT Patch Cost Detail Sheet l i EQUIPMENT COSTS TYPE X HOURLY RATE X SHIFT = EXTENSIOPLr: - NO. 25.00 8 200.00 1 Truck, 10 CY, Dump I 1 Truck, Pickup 5.00 8 40.00 $ 240.00 TOTAL EQUIPMENT COST LABOR COSTS CLASSIFICATION X HOURLY RATE X SHIFT = EXTENSION NO . a>?s } 1 Truck Driver 13.00 8 104.00 i 4 Laborers, Flagmen 11.00 8 352.00 TOTAL LABOR COSTS 456.00 _ MATERIAL COSTS QUANTITY UNIT DESCRIPTION X UNIT COST =EXTENSION 1 6 Ton Hot BIT Mix 30/ton 180.00 _ 1/100 Ton Asphalt BIT Tack 150/ton 2.00 1 TOTAL MATERIAL COSTS $ 182.00 ? + Form No. Pending 4/83 Second Page MC 5-13•(a) t . 14:StAd l L? i g fi. , ?Utffr .. I T a .. A / f ANNUAL MAINTENANCE COSTS (County Gas Tax-Independent Cost Estimate) Item # /3?a) WORK ACTIV MAT. CAT hiX B/T ?'/frcl Urban Rural --- Lj F/C Acctxs 120 e17- Basic Production per day 4W Miles - G fAi ?X FACTORS THAT LIMIT PRODUCTION (UNIT PER DAY) Life CyrJe, y Side Work Approaches, Appurtenances Miles Lost Frequency J- Years a Extent of Work Each Mile Miles Lost Severity of Defects Miles Lost aD v Lost Time (Emergency, Long Haul) Miles Lost - Basic Production _.P/ Q Traffic (Flagging, Detours) Miles Lost - Less Lost Miles - ?` Other Than Above Miles Lost - a0 = Adjusted Production ? Miles per Day 1 r JOB COSTS PER DAY (See Reverse Side) _ 711l Equipment Costs: $ ;4 yo ' <- Labor Costs: $ ys6 1 _ Material Costs: $ f Total = $ 7f' = Total Cost $ ZIy per Job Mile Adj. Production 9,0_ j ` ;K L . 1 / Cost per Job Mile 7 per mile Frequency / ANNUAL COST $ per mile 1 ol-y?/fin Supporting Calculations: 1760 YWi I t J'i?t? _ 4 = X 0 DO/ = % y SY/i%i 1.'l SyX 0.1/ yJ _.1rCY oY .3foh/..? ar 3.3 JK.??,n X ?ona =a0 ?+??? f DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 1 STATE AID ORGANIZATION Calculation Date 4/13/83 Checked By J Y? _ Date COUNTY GAS TAX INDEPENDENT COST ESTIMATE ANNUAL MAINTENANCE COSTS { Item # 12 Activity Preparation of Overly Cost Detail Sheet EQUIPMENT COSTS NO. TYPE X HOURLY RATE X SHIFT = EXTENSION 1 Grader, 10 ton 20.00 8 160.00 1 Water truck (1,000 gal) 28.00 8 224.00 112 Roller-Distributor 8-11 ton 12.00 4 48.00 ( 112 Sweeper, Power Broom 32.00 4 128.00 I 2 Truck, 10 CY Dump 25.00 8 400.00 4 Pickup Trucks 5.00 8 160.00 TOTAL EQUIPMENT COST $1,120.00 LABOR COSTS NO. CLASSIFICATION X HOURLY RATE X SHIFT = EXTENSIOM ?'- 1 Operator, Grader 13.00 8 104.00 2 Truck Drivers,Dump 13.00 8 208.00 ' 112 Operator Roller Jcombined 13.00 8 104.00 112 Operator,Broom 2 Flagmen 4 Laborers 6 men 12.00 8 576.00 9 1i TOTAL LABOR COSTS $ 992.00 ? - h i MATERIAL COSTS i QUANTITY UNIT DESCRIPTION X UNIT COST = EXTENSION Gallon Water (free) -0- TOTAL MATERIAL COSTS $ -0- Form No. Pending 4/83 Second page MC 5-12 I 14:StAd1 i _J . annual maintenance costs seal and pre level preparation a i I 2 Distribution Qperator 13.00 1 Spreader Box Operator 13.00 8 Dump Truck Drivers 13.00 2 Roller Operators 13.00 1 Tanker Driver 13.00 5 Laborers 12.00 1 oader Operator 10 260.00 10 130.00 10 1,040.00 10 260.00 10 130.00 10 600.00 13.00 10 130.00 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 4/11/83 STA TE AID ORGANIZATION Calculation Date- Checked By __ JM Date =6=8:E: COUNTY GAS TAX INDEPENDE NT COST ESTIMA TE ANNUAL MAINTENANCE COSTS Item # 10 Activity Sea]joat BIT _ Cost Detail Sheet EQUIPMENT COSTS N7 ? F k X Di tr but T HOUOROLOY RATE X SH IF"f 00N = E ? ON s i ion ruc w/heater (1,000 gal) O 1 O 0 2 Roller 8 to 11 ton 12.00 10 240.00 8 Dump Trucks, 10 C.Y. 25.00 10 2,000.00 1 Water Truck (1,000 gal) ,.. 20.00 10 200.00 1 Insulated Transfer 20.00 10 200.00 Supply Truck 1 Spreader Box 30.00 10 300.00 4 Pickup Trucks/Pilot Car s 5.00 10 200.00 1 Loader 20.00 10 200.00 TOTAL EQUIPMENT COST j 3,640.00_ LABOR COSTS NO CLASSIFICATION X HOURLY RATE X SHIFT = EXTENSION MATERIAL COSTS QUANTITY UNIT 150 Ton 900 C. Y. unknown Gal, i, t! Form No. Pending 4/83 14:StAd1 L TOTAL LABOR COSTS $ 2,550.00 DESCRIPTION X UNIT COST = EXTENSION Liquid BIT Seal $250/ton 37,500.00 Aggregate $8.00/C.Y. 7,200.00 Water ?free? I I r- + WSDOT - STATE AID ORGANIZATION Date ,73' / From Desk of: ?c ?ry { ANNUAL MAINTENANCE COSTS JJJ (C mity Gas Tax-Independent Cost Estimate) Item / -l- WORK ACTIVITY S1 n 1 MAT. CAT S ? t? 1. [ELF . ?_ /7- /lU/!AL F/C f7rrP3'J 4 // Basic Production per day lar Miles ter ?d ha H ?ay? ` FACTORS THAT LIMIT PRODUCTION (UNIT PER DAY) Life Cycle, i Side Work Approaches, Appurtenances Frequency Years Extent of Work Each Mile j _ Severity of Defects L t Ti (E L H l) B P os me mergency,. ong au asic roduction Traffic (Flagging, Detours) Less Lost Miles k,. Other Than Above j = Adjusted Production Miles per Day JOB COSTS PER DAY (See Reverse Side) Equipment Costs: $ ?L `/? Labor Costs: $ „2 S 10 Material Costs: $ 41 90D Total = $ SD = Total Cost $$ per Job Mile i Adj. Production L. C t J b Mile Y 2 os per o ° 0 Frequency ANNUAL COST $ I bbO per mile r' i 1 Supporting Calculations: - Calculated By Date Maintenance Category C S Reviewed By Date Activity r l D - a T3/I0I Page r j, , i y, i?ftT c9r??t- iTIh1ATE Ite (-B3 -CO :LE MULT MILE 0.14 0 07 7 . .. SO i y? ? ? s / U/ _ /B .f 7 3 S? /S 0.125 1.0 _L 1.0 -L 1.0 3.c JAL COST = _ 12.0 0.121 1.0 ?,? ill ,4 IAL COST = `!-'--1=0--1-? / 1.0 2.0 70 /a8 1.0 X35 n.2 0.33 :1h0 U3' JAL COST - w 0.1 /M6 JAL COST = y f I. l; I r , ?J F? f'Il?f CaT s i? i 1 - I I 1 l., I I I i i i OLD ?. are+' TASK --- ACTIVITY It, M-1., -.1der% -._ ._._._...-_. 0ST/Jn1l M11 F .LL"UItIT - I'L"R MILE ?..LIFC - CYCLE Fltf:ll MULT -o -•.°'URL COST . MILE la Nu.ioa Nght cal .ay G _ _ .Z I.p 0 5 - 3 , 3. Chemical VeaetnwnacntNl oZ°? _ I . 1.0 q ?9 RtJAb51DC 36. Noalous Weed Contrul /.Z l •• p ??p MAINT. 37. Sldewalks.61cV,1e Paths A Trails - .. resurlaaing 0.07 /?ip b. palching N/p c. slgnini A delinerilan • N/RI d. I-olng 7.0 N/a9 ROADSIDE MAINTENANCE ANNUAL COST = 35. Slgns• ection and PO 1 Ins g1 yZ 3.0 p b. Cl- App c. Reset signs A post f-dals.6 accidental _1-7 / 3 0.1 • 1 d. Replace slantA pests e. Repaherreol...dellnu- ??. I 0.1. • j AIM 39. Mwkings • a Cenlaline A lane snlplni 0.5 . 141:_ a t a? b. Edg.llne ,,Iping • Rural O.S c. Gore A special striping Incl. Islands _ 1.0 0.5 TRAFFIC CONTROL d, Paint.eaug.,-, stop bar or creuwalk At 1.0 1.0 ,(K}Q p/?/ DEVICES . Replica lane masked and buttons 40. 51j..1-nor LlShling• a. Retamp signal • _ •• 3.0 NIA a??f} b. Inspect and fcoalr ceenllolled c. Rep.lr signal head 3.0 • A1119 i4'/f'f d. Redact pole) q Repairdeteclof(loopscrPace) _ • ' A///? q//R I. Pd--lee charge • annual al. Guardre0 a. Paint guardrail 6 pasts 1.0 0.7 act;/fL b. st-l-rreplaceg-drall c. RecaV Ira3nc curb 1"C" cu". Hands, N l barrlu..u.) ti • at//? _ :. I ' .,, xa t I f ' - t I 1 a _ s -. - y s ' TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES ANNUAL COST = - Y? I . TOTAL ANNUAL MAINTENANCE COST = two"",, WSDOT - STATE AID ORGANIZATION Date From Desk of: ?f/Py ANNUAL MAINTENANCE COSTS (County Gas Tax-Independent Cost Estimate) Item # I WORK ACTIVITY MAT. CAT F/C ?c sS 1 Basic Production per day Va Miles FACTORS THAT LIMIT PRODUCTION (UNIT PER DAY) Life Cycle, Side Work Approaches, Appurtenances Frequency 1? Years Extent of Work Each Mile 1 Severity of Defects ?? Lost Time (Emergency, Long Haul) Basic Production - Traffic (Flagging, Detours) Less Lost Miles - Other Than Above { = Adjusted Production Y2- Miles per Day I JOB COSTS PER DAY (See Reverse Side) Equipment Costs: $ 3 Sao Labor Costs: ?- 'I ? Material Costs: $ 4, t/ 600 Total = (oy, y60 = Total Cost $ /.3P `W per Sob Mile Adj. Production -9- Cost per Job Mile Sao Frequency ANNUAL COST per mile I i Supporting Calculations: U a ?/e?y . ?yao ?y rd ?W Xa ; la cy y/' ayo6.?/y . 0. yl?ir?e?y r A?' Calculated By Date q-/r B Maintenance Category 0 ?lrasS Reviewed By Date i Activity # T3/101 Page i s J 1 r 7E dC 7 1, ANNUAL MAINTENANCE COSTS (County Gas Tax-Independent Cost Estimate) i C r - /() MAT. CAT r Item 42 WORK ACTIVrXY / L ?z u/ ?Q Y?rl -? Y 4 Urban Rural 1- (J c F/C ccl? 6 Miles Basic Production per day FACTORS THAT LIMIT PRODUCTION (UNIT PER DAY) Life Cycle, /t- Side Work Approaches, Appurtenances Miles Lost _ Frequency Years Extent of Work Each Mile !!Miles Lost - ? i Severity of Defects Miles Lost = 6 Lost Time (Emergency, Long Haul) Miles Lost Basic Production Traffic (Flagging, Detours) Miles Lost Less Lost Miles - Other Than Above Miles Lost i_ = Adjusted Production ?o Miles per Day JOB COSTS PER DAY (See Reverse Side) Equipment Costs: $ 117 o Labor Costs: $ 4799 Material Costs: $ -o- Total = $ 2 , /IZ = Total Cost $ 3l? per Job Mile Adj. Production Cost per Job Mile 353 ?? _ per mile Frequency ANNUAL COST $ a3 per mile Supporting Calculations: i . Calculated By _ _]? Date,! 1 F3 Maintenance Category C 7 Reviewed By Date _ Activity i -/? ' T3/101 Page / is 15?.EY. yld WSDOT - STATE AID ORGANIZATION Date From Desk of: ]?brhe? l? ANNUAL MAINTENANCE COSTS (County Gas Tax-bukpendent Cost Estimate) r Item / / 4J WORK ACTIVITY MAT. CAT ll// yy Basic Production per day oL0 Miles = 6 T6h FACTORS THAT LIMIT PRODUCTION (UNIT PER DAY) Life Cycle, I Side Work Approaches, Appurtenances Frequency Years ((( Extent of Work Each Mile { Severity of Defects i Lost Time (Emergency, Long Haul) Basic Production -70 f Traffic (Flagging, Detours) Less Lost Miles Other Than Above; = Adjusted Production e"LO Miles per Day JOB COSTS PER DAY (See Reverse Side) Equipment Costs: $ -740 Labor Costs: $ sus-4 Material CosUt Total = $ Total Cost $ ?y per Job !4ile I Adj. Production __L 11 Cost per Job Mile.. _ Frequency ANNUAL COST per mile Supporting Calcu Lions: - ?av o e e c Su ce Q?'?2 > coo/ y . Ic r ?, a17 0, . a TAN/c. Y. 44111. ay - K? 000/ 14, OPQ SY./,Yi e ?' . l y/?Pl?7" 1. y sy X o. /1 GY n h G 3 tar?'ii ?h 3 3 ?i/ti Calculated By Date Maintenance Category i?rZ Reviewed By Date Activity 9 T3/101 Page / I >I i h - ? f L? r? ' WSDOT I i Item 0 _ Basic Pr j FACTO Side Wo Extent Severity Lost Ti Traffic Other z. JOB Cos Eq ? La Ma Total = $ Adj. Prod Cos Fre Supportin I I I 1 i ?a Calculate Reviewed - STATE AID ORGANIZATION Date P From Desk of: C ANNUAL 'MAINTENANCE COSTS (County Gas Tax-Independent Cost Estimate) fit`- WORK ACTIVITY MAT. CAT ?aP 6T /??'71?- Pp F/C oduction per day 0 Miles A,/", RS THAT LIMIT PRODUCTION (UNIT PER DAY) Life Cycle, rk Approaches, Appurtenances ?- Frequency 2 Years F of Work Each Mile !f of Defects f s me (Emergency, Long Haul) Basic Production 26 1 Flagging, Detours) Less Lost Miles Than Above I., = Adjusted Production o?D Miles per Day TS PER DAY (See Reverse Side) uipment Costs: $ gyo bor Costs: $?Z terial Costs: $ /a.2 Total Cost $ y? per Job Mile uction t per Job Mile V / quency ANNUAL COST $ per mile g Calculations: { oh ???/fa/y d By 5?7 Date Maintenance Category / By -- Date / Activity ! Page N i _ i _ i Op WSDOT - STATE AID ORGANIZATION„ From Desk of f P? ANNUAL MAINTENANCE COSTS y (County Gas Tax-kxk'Penden; C ost Estimate) ( Item ff `?c WORK ACTIYIT ,3 L?ig !! c 1/? ? MA CPT -7 (1 i cle4 A ' F/C Basic Production per day SD Miles t=?? ?f ive ? c. FACTORS THAT LIMIT PRODUCTION (UNIT PER DAY) Life Cycle, Side Work Approaches, Appurtenances Ext i ent of Work Each Mile Frequency 4_ Years Severity of Defects T me (Emergency, Long Haul) r T 44 r raffic {Fla in Producti Other Than gAbove Detours)Less L&4 ic Milesn f`O -?_ = Adjusted Production 1"2 I , JOB COSTS PER UeiY (See Reverse Side) Miles per Day Equipment Costs: 1 Labor Costs: $_ S-d Material Costs: $- 330 Total = $ 660 = Total Cost 12 Adj. Production _Cp per Job Mile t Cost per Job Mile Frequency ANNUAL COST $ W mile '?WPortine Calculations: F Calculated By Reviewed By -?- Date Maintenance Category / Date --? _ .:'? Activity i T3/101 C Page ! { y . I i I WSDOT - STATE ? AID ORGANIZATION Date g, j From De--k of: ANNUAL MAINTENANCE COSTS (County Gas T-4ndependent Cost Estimate) r Item # 13!!// 1q? WORM, ACTIVITY MAT. CAT ,-f j GK Q ? F/C Basic Production per day ?d MilesYOJ' FACTORS THAT LIMIT PRODUCTION (UNIT PER DAY) Life Cycle, Side Work iApproaches, Appurtenances Frequenc Y E y ears xtent of Work Each Nile Severity of Defects + Lost Time (Emergency, Long Haut) Basic Production J Traffic (Flagging, Detours) I Less Lost Miles Other Than Above - f . = Adjusted Production Miles'per Day JOB COSTS PER DAY (See Reverse Side) Equipment Costs: $ 76d Labor Costs: $ s yp Material Costs: Total = $ 3d?? = Total Cost per Job Mile Adj. Product i. Cost per Job Mile - T- Frequency ANNUAL COST $ 3 y prmile o hS?3a/fa?J I. SW22Ct111Jt Ca1NIdt10nS: _ M 'i i I Calculated By Date y i? -L3 Maintenance Cate # g Revi d B ewe y y Date Activity # T3/101 Page # J _ 0 l? l7SDOT - STATE AID ORGANIZATION Date From Desk of: i ANNUAL MAINTENANCE COSTS (County Gass Tax-independent Cost Estimate) - Item S WORK ACTIVI?? F u?? `cx/' /-X,-C// ; MAT. T 7 ?? F/C v / / ? Basic Production er da c SO Mi Y L p y les r ;y, f //P i FACTORS THAT LIMIT PRODUCTION (UNIT PER DAY) Life Cycle, Side Work Approaches, Appurtenances Extent of Work Each Mile Frequency r/ Years Severity of Defects f Lost Time (Emergency, Long Haul) f . Traffic (Flagging, Detours) Basic Production S`n t Other Than Above Less Lost Miles - f = Adjusted Production .Sa Miles per Day ti P JOB COSTS PER DAY (See Reverse Side) + i Equipment Costs: $ 90?/ ' Labor Costs: $ 6IP6 Material Costs: $ 3'7S-b Total = $ S3 3 Total Cost $ 167 per job Mile Adj. Production D Cost per Job Mile oe 167 r Frequency 7 I" ANNUAL COST per mile a h 7 S u2porting Calculations: 7 ?h I" _ /_ j?iso»rr: L/?hrf?C.r Trrifnl crtrr??rr••rce ? 16 IffNC t4,1411 s? c?? ?t ar 3? _ 70 fy - j I• I Calculated B o Reviewed Byy DaDate te Maintenance Category ?_ Activity T3/101 Page a j ,tar, ' '. , ...._..._...... ...._ .._....._...._.?ea .tip :? -.. _.' • .. -, WSDOT - STATE AID ORGANIZATION Date F k D f rom es o cij i ANNUAL MAINTENANCE COSTS (County Gas Tax-Independent Cost Estimate) I Item 0 N WORK ACTIVITY MAT. CAT 'Of/ah 146111 1114"Al F/C Basic Production per day (-,o Miles Ei tccfiUt FACTORS THAT LIMIT PRODUG PION (UNIT PER DAY) Life Cycle, Side Work Approaches, Appurtenances Frequency _07- Years Extent of Work Each Mile Severity of Defects Lost Time (Emergency, Long Haul) Basic Production SO Traffic (Flagging, Detours) Less Lost Miles Other Than Above = Adjusted Production ?'V Miles per Day JOB COSTS PER DAY (See Reverse Side) Equipment Costs: $ /300 Labor Costs: $ 1500 i, Material Costs: $ 900 7D0 ` ? Total = $ = Total Cost $ 17 per Job Mile Adj. Production Cost per Job Mile L, J Frequency °? ANNUAL COSTS 3r/ per mile Supporting Calculations: I o i Calculated By Date 41 111r s3 Maintenance Category i? Reviewed By Date Activity li T3/101 Page 0 1 r?. )ab?m An- ?? ems? WSDOT - STATE AID ORGANIZATION ANNUAL MAINTENANCE COSTS (County Gas Tax-Independeit Cost Estimate) Item # -4Q1 WORK ACTIVITY MAT. CAT 17 PN rat//?1 ? ? F/C Basic Production per day _ 4 Miles FACTORS THAT LIMIT PRODUCTION (UNIT PER DAY) Life Cycle, Side Work Approaches, Appurtenances Frequency 2 Years Extent of Work Each Mile Severity of Defects Lost Time (Emergency, Long Haul) Basic Production 3 _ Traffic (Flagging, Detours) Less Lost Miles Other Than Above _ JOB COSTS PER DAY (S Equipment Costs: Labor Costs: Material Costs: Total = $ Adj. Production Adjusted Production 3 Miles per Day ee Reverse Side) S X00 Total Cost $ 1a6 per Job Mile Cost per Job Mile Frequency Supporting Calculations: ANNUAL COST $ ?.P' per mile i ? II I' j i i ' Calculated By # Date zz J3 Reviewed By Date T3/101 Page / Date 1 zz- ?2 From Desk of: nn r n,j? Annual Maintenance costs should add material --- I WSDOT - STATE AID ORGANIZATION Date _ From Desk of: ANNUAL MAINTENANCE COSTS (County Gas Tax-independent Cost Estimate) Item 9 ?b WORK ACTIVITY MAT. CAT 7 Po 4// ( lir i j F/C arcs Basic Production per day 3e) Miles FACTORS THAT LIMIT PRODUCTION (UNIT PER DAY) Life Cycle, I Side Work Approaches, Appurtenances Frequency 1 Years Extent of Work Each Mile Severity of Defects Lost Time (Emergency, Long Haul) Basic Production 30 Traffic (Flagging, Detours) Less Lost Miles Other Than Above = Adjusted Production 30 Miles per Day JOB COSTS PER DAY (See Reverse Side) j Equipment Costs: $ y? Labor Costs: $ 020 r r?. Material Costs: $ - 0 - Total = $ (oy? = Total Cost $ as per Job IlA.ile Adj. Production {. F Cost per Job Mile 0eZ2 Y ,? Frequency ANNUAL COST $ 2;L per mile Supporting Calculations: ?ISSG//1 /a`/: Oy? s1l%Y?f*cTiv?iS' 9' ???SJ' Calculated By Date Reviewed By Date Page 0 Maintenance Category /_7 Activity ? /lv ?I (f s 71 3 l WSDOT - STATE AID ORGANIZATION Date S"- .P From Desk of: dhe 111 ANNUAL MAINTENANCE COSTS (County Gas Tax-Independent Cost Estimate) Item # WORK ACTIVITY MAT. CAT l? C? 'L Basic Production per day oZ Miles "OF FACTORS THAT LIMIT PRODUCTION (UNTT PER DAY) Life Cycle, Side work Approaches, Appurtenances Fre quency Years Extent of Work Each Mile - ,a- Severity of Defects Lost Time (Emergency, Long Haul) Basic Production Z c> Traffic (Flagging, Detours) Less Lost Miles Other Than Above = Adjusted Production VQ Miles per Day f i JOB COSTS PER DAY (See Reverse Side) Equipment Costs: i Labor Costs: Material Costs: $ -0 - Total = $ /aZp = Total Cost $ to per Job Mile Adj. Production 20 " . Cost per Job Mlle Frequency 1 ANNUAL COST $ 6 Per mile ? i S ortin Calculations: L ff?on? cart, : ?GvpP?/rq an? J?H?? ?irr,??af?aY aG.I?G11%/?? ?ISt?, f E Calculated By Date Lr-3 - 3 Maintenance Category # 1,7 Reviewed By Date Activity # / rf - - I I T3/101 Page # t f i Maintenanc e Cus1 C11411alc • AN NUM. Lt-ttrl- ULU F; 'l HtFt COS?y TASK ACTIVITY 10. Sul Cn,[ (b5i Ru,isl COST/JOG MIL° PER MILE CYCLE MULT 0.11 0 01 MILE -? A?I/f 11. 314-- PHnt MI. Se+) (ACP R.41) . ee - 1 12. Pr:r-CII,l to nvsri+v (dltrh, alle, ICrs11 33. --- • R a. rim Ati. P+tcb ''/ ? a'-- b. Cab Mix P,tch h 11 -- --- W - c. Skin P, MI9 (hit d miss c - / I L/ A d. Cra:a Sul ng h w / ?>-"?-"- e. Full Depth Patc --- i PAVED +ROAVAAY r .•u,,.r.,rt v«I.men[IPA, j d ..-.-- SURFACES .. 4 WI R 6 Shaping -- - 0 125 IWA o. A1111", m 1gLl S Du,hIn • M h N k d l . 1.0 Y ,ween Ii . e. , C+ ?S brklg<, bland,, ell. Manual fruplntrnectbn I; -- 1.0 , , . lun.p Id SP11nir 1.0 A- , . PAVED ROADW AY SURFACES ANNUAL CO ST' I I' d Y 1 --- ' 12.0 20. Gr+d nf Rmgate(2'depth) Adding A 21 ?. d "7 ??(pc 0.125 / el 7-7- VED Y . a/3 I.0 ? UNPA 22. Dun Dling(PCtr 1-a chemical) ROADWAY - n SURFACES 22. Erosion +rdler,e[tiement reP+k I UNPAVED ROADW AY SURFACES ANNUAL COST= Pnn[ culvgt mgks ) _?- ? i.0 25 . 26. Clean culvert suds ar?' ?- 2'0 /A ? ? - C. E., M,U., D.W. 27. CC: , = = L0 /. / ?/A pRAIHAGE , . . ndre?xir cloard frstamsincl.«drgl 2g Cb PMC ?aoo -- 1 29. Ilun dlun np 20. Ulunl [,Mmur frutrr (Insl.nu,ldngl ??????11 ,z(_ --7.+.1-- DRAINAGE ANNUAL COST = t-y-- ----- - ]2. L.PCndnugsln<luding urTlme (I+hor _ --•_- r- ?-- SNOW L ICE ehw; mrnl a n•,:.rUh) Im wx PaM 1C ul<n'u ,un nnllnd,Mr n, mow b lcs CONTROL ..... " 0.1 <NUW AND ICE CONI ROL ANNUAL COST =? ?,( /?rJJ 1 114T </fr "3 0l n I :. -- -- ---- -- --------------..----... .-.. .. -.. ... fd.l.'UGIT LII L' .... [.; rtn,I?AL COST TASK ncnvfrv OST/dli lt MI IF PE Ii MLLL CYCLE hill!.! . NILF. ----- l lJrn ^ W ? ' 11 ---? iuu 17. Muwing s la.Mowing riFhs olwaY ? _. °2 O.Y nc .-I l 29 -1_ to ?9 6 bg ' u Is. ch-11'alVegtd Nerd Coastal i /oz0 1 •• Q /t7?C? ioE 6 Ili. Noa uw tIAiNT. 37. 5ldcw+lss, Nl'Vae Paths S Trails _ nwrl+[In{ a _?_ 0,07 ?'/? _ . ' ?1-_ b. Palching - - 1 N?n d, sweeping .0 ROADSIDE MAINTENANCE ANNUAL COST = 39. Slgns• d I T'0 P- a. Ineionn 17 OS eLN b. Ctean dens ns L pat (vd JI- 6 acckents) an Resat d ? ' / c. g d, RePtcr sign! a posts . I y 0.14 e2 e. RsDah oe feDtce drilnea'oI ' 39. Markings- OS H/a? a. Cenlerllne 6 lane striping 1.0 ellnc striping - Rural Ed b OS g . 1.0 0.5 iY/f1- TRAFFIC c. Gon 6 specti SIIIpIng Incl. !'lands _ I.0 ?- NTROL osswsls o c t b 1.0 CO op ar r r d. Paint message, am., s e lane marten and buttons R l DEVICES ep ac . 40. 51'n+1- and LI{hllnt • Z.0 iV/A a. Relamp signal Ins ect and Is111, cpnllolle/ b 3.0 . p c. Revell signs! head ' ,11A d. Re Place poles Repah dteptor (Iot,PS or pad') y?4 1. Powrl soMce chMe • annual 1.0 / y¢•. I1. GusMnn• 0'0 lillh a. Pains guardrail 6 Dols Rep+l/or replace {uardnll b . c. Rewh tr+In, [orb 1"C"<uN, I N/ aI - K- iJanJS,Nlbatiea,etc.) - =? TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES ANNUAL COST TOTAL ANNUAL MAINTENANCE COST = LIZ ANNUAL MAiNTENAN,:E COSTS (County Gas Tax-Independent Cost Estimate) I, item / ?d WORK ACTIV? MAY. CAT h Urban Rural - Ik F/C ciisr Basic Production per day Miles FACTORS THAT LIMIT PRODUCTION (UNIT PER DAY) Life Cycle, . Side Work Approaches, App irtenances Miles Lost Frequency ears Extent of Work Each Mile Miles Lost Severity of Defects Miles Lost Lost Time (Emergency, Long Haul) Miles Lost - Basic Production 5? r I... } .. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 1 STATE AID ORGANIZATION Calculation Date 5/9/83 Checked By Date v • ?, s i COUNTY GAS TAX INDEPENDENT COST ESTIMATE ANNUAL MAINTENANCE COSTS f Item 0 20 Activity Unpaved Surface Grading Cost Detail Sheet ,M EQUIPMENT COSTS NO. TYPE X HOURLY RATE X SHIFT = EXTENSION 1 Grader 21.00 8 168.00 L t 1 Pickup Truck 5.00 8 40.00 _ I J + TOTAL EQUIPMENT COST 208.00 LABOR COSTS NO. CLASSIFICATION X HOURLY RATE X SHIFT = EXTENSION " i i 1 Operator,Grader 13.00 8 104.00 I TOTAL LABOR COSTS $ 104.00 i i j • MATERIAL COSTS QUANTITY UNIT DESCRIPTION X UNIT COST. = EXTENSION NONE TOTAL MATERIAL COSTS S -0- Form No. Pending 4/83 Secatd Page MC 1-20 i? 14:StAd1 r r' 9 ANNUAL MAINTENANCE COSTS (County Gas Tax-Independent Cost Estimate) Item 0 - al WORK ACTIVITYr/ /?UNp4?e Svr?LT¢ce. MAT. CAT 51 _ AdAiri y ? MgAe Urban Rural F/C A-mexy Basic Production per day 3.9 Miles or -'-?0 ('V FACTORS THAT LIMIT PRODUCTION (UNIT PER DAY) Life Cycle, Side Work Approaches, Appurtenances Miles Lost _ Frequency LP Year., Extent of Work Each Mile Miles Lost j Severity of Defects Miles Lost Lost Time (Emergency, Long Haul) Miles Lost Basic Production 3.3 Traffic (Flagging, Detours) = Miles Lost _ Less Lost Miles Other Than Above Miles Lost JOB COSTS PER DAY (See Reverse Side) = Adjusted Production 3.3 Miles per Day Equipment Costs: Labor Costs: $ 96I' Material Costs: $ /0280 Total = $ 3536 = Total Cost $ D7;7_ per Job Mile Adi. Production 3 • Z i i I Cost per Job Mile = its per mile Frequency ANNUAL COST $ /f 072 per mile s / o r • ?i/'Toh ;i I -tin Calculations: 1 / / 1 Y7 9SSoU?Mf ?erJll?G?11 car a"Ryl? e•?411 N+ik lI ?eTl /rcP?HJ ?h y?/}?9 /? 4??? ryy?rlg4/L S6Vla7! `ollPlf o?PH ?/? f? c[e Wirry Gl?GNXp? ?,/?1T// sat o t760?? = aao y?r x dl-6tv4e = 1764 J: y. x 2 9.P cY,/i•,,'. 3 ?dyd - 8 ,?,1< 3 3` /y/ edl/e oy 6r3 Date { ,/?.g3 Maintenance Category 0 3 Date Activity 0 a / Page 0 x. Ya. I . ...nr .ate..„,•, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STATE AID ORGANIZATION Calculation Date 5/13/83 Checked By _a t-? Date _ COUNTY GAS TAX INDEPENDENT COST ESTIMATF ANNUAL MAINTENANCE COSTS Item 0 21 Unpaved Surface Grading Activity Adding A ngregaa te,___ Cost Detail Sheet EQUIPMENT COSTS NO. TYPE X HOURLY RATE X SHIFT = EXTENSION 1 Loader 20.00 8 1 Grader 21 00 160.00 . 4 Trucks, 10 Cy Dump 25 00 8 168.00 . 4 Pickup Trucks 5 00 8 800.00 . 8 160.00 I ] TOTAL EQUIPMENT COSY 1+288 LABOR COSTS NO. CLASSIFICATION X HOURLY RATE X SHIFT = EXTENSION 1 Operator, Loader 12.00 1 8 Operator, Grader 13.00 4 8 96.00 Truck Drivers, Dump 13.00 ? 8 104.00 c = Laborers, Flagmen 11 00 416.00 . 8 352.00 f- TOTAL LABOR COSTS $ 968.00 L__. i - i i I t i l WSDOT - STATE AID ORGANIZATION ANNUAL MAINTENANCE COSTS (County Gas Tax-Independent Cost Estirna f Item 9 ?a WORK ACTIVITY MAI Urban Rural _ F/C Basic Production per day ZI Miles e7?Pc ?? f41e FACTORS THAT LIMIT PRODUCTION (UNIT PER DAY) Side Work Approaches, Appurtenances Miles Lost Extent of Work Each Mile Miles Lost Severity of Defects Miles Lost Lost Time (Emergency, Long HauU Miles Lost Traffic (Flagging, Detours) Miles Lost ( Other Than Above Miles Lost Date -!3- 9- From Dosk'd, CAT 4 e Life Cycle, Frequency Years Basic Production Less Lost Miles = Adjusted Production 41/ Miles per Day JOB COSTS PER DAY (See Reverse Side) Equipment Costs: $ Labor Costs: Material Costs: $ 000 Total = < </ 00 0 = Total Cost $ 1, 000 per Job Mile Adj. Production /DOO per mile g Cost per Job Mile Frequency ANNUAL COST per mile Su porting{ calculationnls: /` rov:: FtP ?IC4?leh rl e 'to q??oh/0 1 ?POad[.a? ,,? J `, o/nlya/07o o-??wy re?uirr? 4??//??f•:? ? W/??l GfSuN?i' ay T? or O ypl. (, 7l) ? ?/ iy Olo b 1766X Y. y X10.1 gfty, vgy l//arm i 000. 3/y nai? ?°?y ?ofsY e o? o7e # 3 Maintenance Category Activity 0 rya _ Date S =/? &3 Date X -:I DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPO RTATION STATE AID ORGANIZATION Calculation Date 5-13-83 Checked By Date i COUNTY GAS TAX INDEPEN DENT COST ESTIMATE ANNUAL MAINTENANCE COSTS Item # 22 Activity . Dust Oiling Cost Detail Sheet EQUIPMENT COSTS y NO. TYPE X HOURLY RATE X SHIFT = EXTENSION EE 1 Distributor Truck 28.00 8 ?- 224.00 1 Grader 21.00 8 168.00 3 Pickup Trucks 5.00 8 120.00 TOTAL EQUIPMENT COST $ 512.00 LABOR COSTS NO. CLASSIFICATION X HOURLY RATE X SHIFT = EXTENSION 2 Operator, Distributor 13.00 8 208.00 1 Operator, Grader 13.00 8 104.00 2 Laborers, Flagmen 11.00 8 176.00 i TOTAL LABOR COSTS 488.00 MATERIAL COSTS QUANTITY UNIT DESCRIPTION X UNIT COST = EXTENSION 3,000 Gallons Oil or Calcium Chloride 1.00 3,000 TOTAL MATERIAL COSTS 3,000 Form No. Pending 4/83 14:StAd1 J777 I WSDOT - STATE AID ORGANIZATION Date ,rR From Desk of: ,rr y ANNUAL MAINTENANCE COSTS (County Gas Tax-independent Cost Estimate) Item # WORK ACTIVITY TN mv" JUG 4«' &9rll i MAT. CAT r c 1 ii Urban Rural _ F/C s Basic Production per day Sb Miles W411/ 1 FACTORS THAT LIMIT PRODUCTION (UNIT PER DAY) Life Cycle, Side Work Approaches, Appurtenances Miles Lost Frequency Years Extent of Work Each Mile Miles Lost Severity of Defects Miles Lost Lost Time (Emergency, Long Haul) Miles Lost - Basic Production Traffic (Flagging, Detours) Miles Lost - Less Lost Miles Other Than Above Miles Lost = Adjusted Production O Miles per Day JOB COSTS PER DAY (See Reverse Side) Equipment Costs: $ /360 - Labor Costs: $ 8P/ Material Costs: $ / y3D r Total = $ Y77 Total Cost $ 87 per Job Mile Adj. Production rp Cost per Job Mile per mile a Frequency ANNUAL COST $ per mile i Supporting Calculations: Calculated By Date t/-104 Reviewed By Date Maintenance Category Activity # / y r i DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPOR'fA'f10N STATE AID ORGANIZATION Calculation Date 5/18/83 Checked By _ Da to COUNTY GAS TAX INDEPENDENT COST ESTIMA1'1 ^ - ANNUAL MAINTENANCE COSTS A Upaved_Surface. Erosion Item 23 ' Activity & Settlement Re air Cost Detail Sheet EQUIPMENT COSTS E NO. TYPE X HOURLY RATE X SHIFT = EXTENSION J IE I N/A -See Item N14 V TOTAL EQUIPMENT COS-f j LABOR COSTS I ' NO. CLASSIFICATION X HOURLY RATE X SHIFT . EXTENSION i Ty N/A TOTAL LABOR COSTS 3 MATERIAL COSTS QUANTITY UNIT DESCRIPTION X UNIT COST . EXTENSION N/A TOTAL MATERIAL COSTS Form No. Pending 4/93 14:StAd1 Second Page MC 3-23 - --------_. iii r? L t r- DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Calculation Date 4/20/83 ( ( ( STATE AID ORGANIZATION Checked By Jh1 Date ?3j1TT8? COUNTY GAS TAX INDEPENDENT COST ESTIMATE ANNUAL MAINTENANCE COSTS Itern # 14 -,23 Activity Erosion Control Coat Detail Sheet. EQUIPMENT COSTS TYPE X HOURLY RATE X SHIFT = EXTENSION NO, 1. Loader w/backhoe 32.00 8 256.00 00 8 168 . 2. Grader 21.00 600.00 3.' Trucks, 10 C.Y. Dumps 25.00 8 - _ r 1 ? ' 12.00 48.00 -4- VitratorY 00 II 160.00 5 . 4. Pickup Trucks m. _ 32.0 -4- 128.00 6 o6 ? I S, . a• ??GJ; aF? - o- 1 TOTAL EQUIPMENT COST $ 1 , 360 LABOR COSTS NO. CLASSIFICATIOiq X HOURLY RATE X SHI FT NO. ' 104.00 1 Operator,backho6/loader 13.00 8 104 00 8 . 1 Operator,grader 13.00 312.00 3 Truck drivers,dum 13.00 8 52.00* Kata- l- Gomp?kgtor 13.00 4 1/2_p e j p , 10 Laborers ,fla men 12.00 8 960.00 00* 4 52 i f . -p_ a lo_ 13.00 j j *Same person 1 j TOTAL LABOR COSTS $ 1 , 584 l MATERIAL COSTS QUANTITY UNIT DESCRIPTION X LINI?TjOST = EXTENSION I 100 C.Y. Borrow backfull ( 600.00 00 a 00 800 ± . 100 Ton Crushed,stone top course Water 30.00 l 1 KAL • - 1,430 TOTAL MATERIAL C0575 $ v Second Page MC 5-14 j Form No. Pending 4/83 • 14:StAd1 i i t WSDOT - STATE AID ORGANIZATION Date -/ - 3 From Desk of: cl?e/r ANNUAL MAINTENANCE COSTS y (County Gas Tax-Independent Cost Estimate) item WORK ACTTV MAT. CAT 3 A/?'"lU/1/Pa Nh,(ytf Urban Rural F/C c?sr or YQ ?IVPIf 1?a.if iz? 2 Mil es Basic Production per day _, 0 FACTORS THAT LIMIT PRODUCTION (UNIT PER DAY) Life Cycle, Side Work Approaches, Appurtenances Miles Lost - Frequency Years Extent of Work Each Mile Miles Lost - Severity of Defects Miles Lost Lost Time (Emergency, Long Haul) Miles Lost - Basic Production 2 i ! Traffic (Flagging, Detours) Miles Lost Less Lost Miles .0 f I Other Than Above Miles Lost =Adjusted Production Miles per Day JOB COSTS PER DAY (See Reverse Side) Equipment Costs: $ C/0 Labor Costs: $ 9Y, Material Costs: $ Total = $ /q,) = Total Cost $ 70 per Job Mile Cost per Job Mile e70 _--k'_ per mile Frequency / ANNUAL COST $ 70 per mile Supporting Calculations: / / 4y5uo1Ar;, : Cv/ven' I-PN .l/fem. / / Owe MII/PY will /I C411 /V/A/__'1" o7- C110- Cu4,71- Adj. Production ol- Calculated By J4- Date d/LA-7 Reviewed By Date T3/IOI Page 0 Maintenance Category i .3 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STATE AID ORGANIZATION Calculation Date 5/18/83 Checked By [late COUNTY GAS TAX INDEPENDENT COST ESTIMATN ANNUAL MAINTENANCE COSTS Item U 25 Activity Paint Culvert ad kerrs Cost Detail Sheet EQUIPMENT COSTS NO. TYPE X HOURLY RATE X SHIFT = EXTENSION I 1 Pickup Truck 5.00 8 40.00 TOTAL EQUIPMENT COST $ 40.00 i` LABOR COSTS NO. CLASSIFICATION X HOURLY RATE X SHIFT = EXTENSION 1 Laborer 11.00 8 88.00 TOTAL LABOR COSTS $ 88.00 MATERIAL COSTS QUANTITY UNIT DESCRIPTION X UNIT COST = EXTENSION 1 1 Gallon Paint 12.00 12.00 999 TOTAL MATERIAL COSTS $ 12.00 Form No. Pending 4/83 Second Page MC 5-25 14:StAd1 I l .ten .. . .,. ...? WSDOT - STATE AID ORGANIZATION ANNUAL. MAINTENANCE COSTS (County Gas Tax-Independent Cost Estimate) Item # Z WORK ACTIVIT?Y/ P-44i ' MAT. CAT g UPON l b?pPY? Urban Rural F/C _ /-Arrisr Basic Production per da ! Pe Y _/Z Miles FACTORS THAT LIMIT PRODUCTION Side Work Approaches, Appurtenances Extent of Work Each Mile Severity of Defects Lost Time (Emergency, Long Haul) Traffic (Flagging, Detours) Other Than Above (UNIT PER DAY) Miles Lost Life Cycle, #0? F requency Years Miles Lost Miles Lost Miles Lost - Basic Production .,5'- Miles Lost Less Lost Miles Miles Lost - = Adjusted Production . S Miles per Day JOB COSTS PER DAY (See Reverse Side) Equipment Costs: $ y0 Labor Costs: $ Pr- Material Costs: $ -0- Total = $ la?- = Total Cost $ as-` _per Job Mile Adj. Production .s Cost per Job Mile 'lo?.S( Frequency porting Calculations: = --?- per mile ANNUAL COST $ per mile G/, ah ''01/3 Pev 'vq4 F F if I ; 1 F]ss?r ?ioti: lIP4N0ufo??0 ('u?iPF Ice,- /Iy Imp 04", Calculated By Reviewed By T3/101 l? J ._ Date f From Desk of: r y DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STATE AID ORGANIZATION Calculation Date 5/19/83_ Checked By -%tr Date ye _ I - 83 COUNTY GAS TAX INDEPENDENT COST ESTIMATE ANNUAL MAINTENANCE COSTS I' Item N . 26 Activity Clean Culverts Cost Detail Sheet EQUIPMENT COSTS NO. TYPE X HOURLY RATE X SHIFT = EXTENSION 1 Pickup Truck 5.00 8 40.00 TOTAL EQUIPMENT COST 40.00 - LABOR COSTS NO. CLASSIFICATION X HOURLY RATE 1 Laborer 11.00 MATERIAL COSTS QUANTITY UNIT None Form No. Pending 4/33 14:StAd1 1:. X SHIFT = EXTENSION 8 88.00 TOTAL LABOR COSTS 88.00 DESCRIPTION X UNIT COST =EXTENSION WSDOT - STATF. AID ORGANIZATION 1 ANNUAL MAINTENANCE COSTS (County Gas Tax-Independent Cost Estimate) Item i oZ9 WORK ACTIVITY ?1 MAT. CAT 3 2 it J//]c I/ Urban Rural F/C ??sr Basic Production per day 2 Miles !s 4? FACTORS THAT LIMIT PRODUCTION Side Work Approaches, Appurtenances Extent of Work Each Mile Severity of Defects Lost Time (Emergency, Long Haul) Traffic (Flagging, Detours) i Other Than Above JOB COSTS PER DAY (See Reverse Side) Equipment Costs: $ t Labor Costs: $ S-oy (UNIT PER DAY) Life Cycle, Miles Lost - Frequency S Years Miles Lost - Miles Lost holes Lost - Basic Production 2 Miles Lost - Less Lost Miles Miles Lost = Adjusted Production L Miles per Day Material Costs: $ -o- Total = $ y00 = Total Cost $ /n/00 per Job Mile Adj. Production Cost per Job Mile ?'/'wo per mile Frequency ANNUAL COST $ a per mile Sporting Calculations: 1 / i ?aSJ?«aif: 0/1!' ahc Sli/c Yavr+l[w lF,wM c/fc?Iirr I - V?QaI c„? li p°r IG YOacJ ?/ ? ? L lS{4v//7ry Ol/TG?//ljtl? v?l? /1 9APv 1?P1?, I Cllr Gl nare'ir 16"0 r/- e - - y. Date (-/-63 Maintenance Category / s f Date Page 0 Activity i a9 Date From Desk of: l/1 s it fly s DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STATE AID ORGANIZATION Calculation Date 6/1/83 Checked By zsm _ Date b-Nn- 83_ COUNTY GAS TAX INDEPENDENT COST ESTIMATE ANNUAL MAINTENANCE COSTS Item 0 29 Activity Heavy Ditching?_ Cost Detail Sheet EQUIPMENT COSTS NO. TYPE X HOURLY RATE X SHIFT = EXTENSION d 1 Backhoe-Loader 32.00 8 256.00 (Drott or equal) 3 Trucks, IOC.Y. Dump 25.00 8 600.00 1 Pickup Truck 5.00 8 40 00 . TOTAL EQUIPMENT COST $ 896.00 LABOR COSTS NO. CLASSIFICATION X HOURLY RATE X SHIFT = EXTENSION 1 Operator,Backhoe 13.00 8 104.00 3 Truck Drivers,Dump 13.00 8 312.00 1 Laborer, Pickup Driver, Flagman 11.00 8 88.00 TOTAL LABOR COSTS $ 504.00 MATERIAL COSTS QUANTITY UNIT DESCRIPTION X UNIT COST = EXTENSION None I TOTAL MATERIAL COSTS $ -0- Form No. Pending 4/83 Second Page MC 3-29 I .. 14:StAdl . J t w MM WSDOT - STATE AID ORGANIZATION ANNUAL MAINTENANCE COSTS (County Gas Tax-independent Cost Estimate) Item f 3? WORK ACTIVITY o r r,,m err MAT. CAT c Urban Rural F/C tn?u- ??cu Basic Production per day _.L Miles FACTORS THAT LIMIT PRODUCTION Side Work Approaches, Appurtenances Extent of Work Each Mile Severity of Defects Lost Time (Emergency, Long Haul) Traffic (Flagging, Detours) Other Than Above JOB COSTS PER DAY (See Reverse Side) (UNIT PER DAY) Life Cycle, Miles Lost _ Frequency 3 Years Miles Lost Miles Lost Miles Lost Basic Production. Miles Lost Less Lost Miles Miles Lost - = Adjusted Production J- Miles per Day Equipment Costs: $ Labor Costs: $ soy Material Costs: $ -0- Total = $ Total Cost $ per Job Mile Adj. Production /\. = per mile ANNUAL COST .? y37 per mile Date From Desk of: a i L< jay $-'. //?/_-/' l l I ;. i WIN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STATE AID ORGANIZATION ° Calculation Date 6/1/83 Checked By -?,o-; _ Date u -B3 I COUNTY GAS TAX INDEPENDENT COST ESTIMATE ANNUAL MAINTENANCE COSTS 4 Item # 30 Activity Motor Grade Di c(ljng Cost Detail Sheet EQUIPMENT COSTS NO. TYPE X HOURLY RATE X SHIFT = EXTENSION 1 Grader 21.00 8 168.00 2 Trucks, IOC.Y. Dump 25 00 8 •. . 400.00 1 Loader 20.00 8 160 00 . 2 Pickup Trucks 5.00 8 80.00 TOTAL EQUIPMENT COST 808.00 LABOR COST, i NO. CLASSIFICATION X HOURLY RATE X SHIFT = EXTENSION 1 Operator, Grader 13.00 8 104.00 2 T ruck Drivers,Dump 13.00 8 208 00 . 1 Operator, Loader 13.00 8 104 00 . 1 Laborer, Flagman 11.00 8 88.00 TOTAL LABOR COSTS 504.00 MATERIAL COSTS QUANTITY UNIT DESCRIPTION X UNIT COST = EXTENSION None i TOTAL MATERIAL COSTS $ -0- 4 II' C Form No. Pending 4/83 Second Page MC 2-30 1 14:StAd1 f I , L? I I . J WSDOT - STATE AID ORGANIZATION Date From Desk of: /_ cl?rrz / ANNUAL MAINTENANCE COSTS (County Gas Tax-independent Cost Estimate) Item _ WORK ACTIVITY Cl MAT. CAT "j i10G l1Py! 6lq/ ?? C ? ' ( v u 2 c;o?a?e/ / r. F/C cct Basic Production per day ?d Miles / '2WpeK Q) ?? FACTORS THAT LIMIT PRODUCTION (UNIT PER DAY) Life Cycle, G Side Work Approaches, Appurtenances Frequency Years Extent of Work Each Mile Severity of Defects I Lost Time (Emergency, Long Haul) Basic Production 60 ` Traffic (Flagging, Detours) Less Lost Miles Other Than Above = Adjusted Production 6,10 Miles per Day i JOB COSTS PER DAY (See Reverse Side) i Equipment Costs: Labor Costs: $ 115 y Material Costs: $ -O - S? r?oTUorr ??"°/ Total= $ ?[7 2 = Total Cost $ S per Job Mile Adj. Production ' e . Cost per Job Mil A Frequency ANNUAL COST $ S per mile S_pu forting Calculations: ? i i j I ? Calculated By o- Date -711 IF7 Maintenance Category 3 Reviewed By _ Date i Activity tt 3oZ T3/101 Page 8 I? ts? _ .? _J ? department of transportation sate aid organization 1 WSDOT - STATE AID ORGANIZATION ANNUAL MAINTENANCE COSTS (County Gas Tax-Independent Cost Estimate) TIVITY Item # :?5 WORK AC MAT. CAT O4//?"Urban Rural F/C Basic Production per day ___Lv miles `sue FACTORS THAT LIMIT PRODUCTION Side Work Approaches, Appurtenances Extent of Work Each Mile Severity of Defects Lost Time (Emergency, Long Haul) Traffic (Flagging, Detours) Other Than Above - l I (UNIT PER DAY) Life Cycle, ies Lost - Frequency i' Years Miles Lost - Miles Lost Miles Lost Basic Production Miles Lost Less Lost Miles - Miles Lost _ = Adjusted Production 16 Miles per Day JOB COSTS PER DAY (See Reverse Side) Equipment Costs: $ /[ X z Labor Costs: -( Material Costs: $ -D - Total = $ y? 'I = Total Cost $ ems- X per Job Mile Adj. Production Cost per Job Mile ::::::I = /? - per mile ANNUAL COST $ a? per mile Calculated By Date - / - d Reviewed By Date Page p I I DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STATE AID ORGANIZATION Calculation Date 6/1/83 Checked By vJ h_ Date i, _ ? 3_ COUNTY GAS TAX INDEPENDENT COST ESTIMATE ANNUAL MAINTENANCE COSTS Item # 33 Activity Mowino Shoulder- Cost Detail Sheet r EQUIPMENT COSTS NO. TYPE X HOURLY RATE X SHIFT = EXTENSION a 1 Mowing Machine 20.00 8 160.00 f TOTAL EQUIPMENT COST j 160.00 LABOR COSTS NO. CLASSIFICATION X HOURLY RATE X SHIFT = EXTENSION I Laborer, Mower Operator 11.00 8 88.00 i 1 i OTAL LABOR COSTS 88.00 MATERIAL COSTS QUANTITY UNIT DESCRIPTION X UNIT COST = EXTENSION t None j t TOTAL MATERIAL COSTS $ -0- Form No. Pending 4/83 g Second Page MC 3-33 14:StAd1 i WSDOT - STATE AID ORGANIZATION Date From Desk ANNUAL MAINTENANCE COS (County Gas Tax- epe nn ?OSt ti e) Item # WORK ACTIV / % MAT. CAT 1 Urban Rural ' F/C r Basic Production r day d Miles 411?1 K47e FACTORS THAT LIMIT PRODUCTION (UNIT PER DAY) Life Cycle, f / Side Work Approaches, Appurtenances Miles Lost - Frequency .47- Years Extent of Work Each Mile Miles Lost Severity of Defects Miles Lost Lost Time (Emergency, Long Haul) Miles Lost Basic Production S Traffic (Flagging, Detours) Miles Lest Less Lost Miles Other Than Above Miles Lost = Adjusted Production S D Miles per Day JOB COSTS PER DAY (See Reverse Side) L; Equipment Costs: $ goo ? Labor Costs: $ i Material Costs: $ -0- Total= $ Total Cost $ w per 3ob Mile Adj. Production so ?.? 6 7, ti Cost per Job Mile per mile I'= Frequency ANNUAL COST $ 3 per mile Supporting Calculations: I r Calculated By Date 4 -/-83 Maintenance Category / Reviewed By Date i { Activity # i T3/101 Page # L I DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STATE AID ORGANIZATION Calculation Date 6/1/83 - Checked By JM Date ,_k COUNTY GAS TAX INDEPENDENT COST ESTIMATE ANNUAL MAINTENANCE COSTS Item B 34 Activity Mowing Shoulders Cost Detail Sheet EQUIPMENT COSTS NO. TYPE X HOURLY RATE X SHIFT = EXTENSION 1 Mowing machine 20.00 8 160.00 1 Pickup Truck 5.00 8 40.00 TOTAL EQUIPMENT COS'[' j 200.00 LABOR COSTS NO. CLASSIFICATION X HOURLY RATE 1 Laborer, Operator of Mower 11.00 X SHIFT = EXTENSION 8 88.00 TOTAL LABOR COSTS $ 88.00 MATERIAL COSTS QUANTITY UNIT DESCRIPTION X UNIT COST =EXTENSION None E TOTAL MATERIAL COSTS $ -0 I, Form No. Pending 4/83 Second Page MC 3-34 14:StAd1 WSDOT - STATE AID ORGANIZATION Date -,? From Desk of: n r h u ANNUAL MAINTENANCE COSTS (County Gas Tax-Independent Cost Estimate) 1 / /?! T. CAT /y1? Item YS WORK ACTIV MA y!/ T o a Urban Rural r F/C -- i Basic Production per day ?J Miles 1 FACTORS THAT LIMIT PRODUCTION (UNIT PER DAY) Life Cycle, Side Work Approaches, Appurtenances Miles Lost _ Frequency 2 Years Extent of Work Each Mile Miles Lost Severity of Defects Miles Lost Lost Time (Emergency, Long Haul) Miles Lost Basic Production IS Traffic (Flagging, Detours) Miles Lost Less Lost Miles - Other Than Above Miles Lost = Adjusted Production ?S Miles per Day JOB COSTS PER DAY (See Reverse Side) j Equipment Costs: $ y? Labor Costs: $ /0'y Material Costs: $ Y-0 Total = $ y 3 2 = Total Cost $ 02 of per Job Mile Adj. Production _ f Cost per Job Mile ?a 7 per mile Frequency / ANNUAL COST $ 29 per mile Supporting Calculations: ?SS??h?Tiu1: OVerto /PAr&- .?D Ly• ` L I ?I/h/c7/oh fir/ ?0/o CoS? T/,w pal! &,mo/oY /CAr -,7Tme . Calculated By Date 6 -43 Maintenance Category d 3 Reviewed By Date Page # Activity / -12s- t L 1 _ DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STATE AID ORGANIZATION Calculation Date 6/1/83 Checked By J? Date 1, . . 83 x COUNTY GAS TAX INDEPENDENT COST ESTIMATE. I ANNUAL MAINTENANCE COSTS # 35 A ti i I Ch v c ty tem emical Veaatation Cntrl . Cosf Detail Sheet EQUIPMENT COSTS NO. TYPE X HOURLY RATE X SHIFT = EXTENSION 7 Truck, w/spray equip. 31.00 8 248.00 I _ t i I TOTAL EQUIPMENT COST 248.00 i LABOR COSTS NO. CLASSIFICATION X HOURLY RATE X SHIFT = EXTENSION 1 Driver, Truck w/spray ?=1 equipment 13.00 8 104.00 TOTAL LABOR COSTS $ 104.00 MATERIAL COSTS QUANTITY UNIT DESCRIPTION X UNIT COST =EXTENSION I Herbicide 80.00 I ? TOTAL MATERIAL COSTS $ 80.00 i i Form No. Pending 4/83 Second Page MC 3-35 14:StAdI i' I WSDOT - STATE AID ORGANIZATION ANNUAL MAINTENANCE COSTS (Canty Gas Tax-Independent Cost Estimate) Item WORK ACTIVITY Q?7,l^? MAT. CAT G pD Urban Rural Basic Production per day -7 Mil s I( FACTORS THAT LIMIT PRODUCTION (UNIT PER DAY) Life Cycle, Side Work Approaches, Appurtenances Miles Lost _ Frequency 2 Years f Extent of Work Each Mile Miles Lost - Severity of Defects Miles Lost - S Lost Time (Emergency, Long Haul) Miles Lost -- Basic Production,. Traffic (Flagging, Detours) Miles Lost Less Lost Miles - Other Than Above Miles Lost - / = Adjusted Production Miles per Day JOB COSTS PER DAY (See Reverse Side) Equipment Costs: $ Labor Costs: $ S /rte / J n[/ / l /,E'N1/C%l+/y1?1 ?J` c?n rOr} Material Costs: $ - Total = $ /a77 = Total Cost $ lack per Job Mile Adj. Production Cost per Job Mile i Frequency / SupFortinx Calculations: per mile ANNUAL COST $ /dp Per mile - f Calculated By Date -'t Reviewed By Date i T3/101 Page 0 Maintenance Category 0 7 Activity / ?k^ 1 ` WSDOT - STATE AID ORGANIZATION Date ,B From Desk of: i? ANNUAL MAINTENANCE COSTS (County Gas Tax-Independent Cost Estimate) Item # WORK ACTIVITY CJ(gij 7f /a!? MAT. CAT _ + $ y? Urban Rural F/C 1 Basic Production per day Sao Miles e??icd/de ?lve ?O? pe FACTORS THAT LIMIT PRODUCTION (UNIT PER DAY) Life Cycle, Side Work Approaches, Appurternances Miles Lost - Frequency Years Extent of Work Each Mile Miles Lost - Severity of Defects Miles Lost - Lost Time (Emergency, Long Haul) Miles Lost Basic Production ; . Traffic (Flagging, Detours) Miles Lost .- Less Lost Miles Other Than Above Miles Lost = Adjusted Production 0 Miles per Day JOB COSTS PER DAY (See Reverse Side) ! Equipment Costs: $ Labor Costs: $ Material Costs: $ -6 - i r !1 Total = $ oZy!! = Total Cost $ per Job Mile Adj. Production so P t d Cost per Job Mile ?_ per mile Frequency ANNUAL COST $ °2 per mile i Stworting Calculations: ?hS?fLl /Ah = ??? ??Jr? plN d4y = laD Jfl/kC ?ilh G/4?J i Calculated By Date / -aJ =83 Maintenance Category ! .> Reviewed By Date Activity # 3?Ca ) T3/101 Page # ,I _J WSDOT - STATE AID ORGANIZATION ANNUAL MAINTENANCE (County Gas Tax-Independent G Item i ?olal WORK ACTIV/ h l qh/Ti Ur Basic Production per day Miles FACTORS THAT LIMIT PRODUCTION (UNIT PER Side Work Approaches, Appurtenances Miles Lost. Extent of Work Each Mile Miles Lost Severity of Defects Miles Lost _ Lost Time (Emergency, Long Haul) Miles Lost _ Traffic (Flagging, Detours) Miles Lost Other 'Than Above Miles Lost _ = Adjust JOB COSTS PER DAY (See Reverse Side) Equipment Costs: $ 4 0 Labor Costs: $ Y-f Material Costs: $ -0- Total = $ Ry? = Total Cost $ /7 l j Adj. Production I i 3?jx /7 Cost per Job Mile e Frequency ' S ANNUAL C j { f Supporting Calculations: Calculated By Date / 2U -6? Reviewed By Date T3/101 Page N l? i WSDOT - STATE AID ORGANIZATION Date /-1,J-8 From Desk of: y ANNUAL MAINTENANCE COSTS (County Gas Tax-Independent Cost Estimate) I Item F ?(C WORK ACTIO MAT. CAT Y FiT Urban Rural ?L F/C Basic Production per day ?Qo miles trt2d? ' 4? fah ue I FACTORS THAT LIMIT PRODUCTION (UNIT PER DAY) Life Cycle , Side Work Approaches, Appurtenances Miles Lost - Frequency Years tI Extent of Work Each Mile Miles Lost Severity of Defects Miles Lost Lost Time (Emergency, Long Haul) Miles Lost Basic Production 300 Traffic (Flagging, Detours) Miles Lost - Less Lost Miles -- i Other Than Above Miles Lost i = Adjusted Production 00 Miles per Day JOB COSTS PER DAY (See Reverse Side) -? Equipment Costs: $ 160 Labor Costs: $ Material Costs: $ -0 Total = $ a yp =Total Costs J b ' per o Mile Adj. Production X60 Cost per Job Mile per mile Frequency ANNUAL COST $ 1 per mile or ?3/°= eQc? SwPOrtintt Calcu lation s: /J N?0? G . Y 7 rf SS p (Y'?1J / Yl?ue ? t /fpJef ?vev 4ye o?p ?S ?rsu Pen ? y r J i Calculated By Date / -a r?t3 Maintenance Category 3 Reviewed By Date Activity B 30 cc. T3/101 Page 0 WSDOT - STATE AID ORGANIZATION Date - 2 f R? From Desk of: ANNUAL MAINTENANCE COSTS (County Gas Tax-independent Cost Estimate) ii I Item # WORK ACTIVITY 'f MAT. CAT 12, P Urban Rural 11 F/C l ctys5 Basic Production per day 3Ub Miles FACTORS THAT LIMIT PRODUCTION (UNIT PER DAY) Life Cycle, Side Work P.pproaches, Appurtenances Miles Lost - Frequency 1 Years Extent of Work Each Mile Miles Lost - Severity of Defects Miles Lost Lost Time (Emergency, Long Haul) Mlles Lost - Basic Production j Traffic (Flagging, Detours) Miles Lost - Less Lost Miles - Other Than Above Miles Lost - = Adjusted Production OU Miles per Day JOB COSTS PER DAY (See Reverse Side) Equipment Costs: $ /?Q - i Labor Costs: $ !F? Material Costs: $ F0 Total = $ U9? = Total Cost $ per lob Mile Adj. Production Soo ? Cost per Job Mile ° per mile Frequency ANNUAL COST $ per mile 1 // Gh x4ch Supporting C a lculation s: ? i n ? / f1SSUlN?uJl eN . ?? IYQ?I Q. (?.ffilG(G ?lUFI/?9C b? ? 5?? ?°N?14?J I , i Calculated By Date ?aJ B3 Maintenance Category / 3 Reviewed by Date A # ctivity T3/101 Page II L Li 1 ;.4 6XISTINGGEOMETRICS 1. hNI+n " 'PI tYM`UnlmprOnOb Oft 13 RST0 ACF/PCC13 A. ROtlwaY wlttl Iwl ) WY1n1MgYa? , 10. No. of lhN l.rRa 0. T lirwl'l.HlO ROllty ? , AN. RIotOfw,,.IdUi N. IS. BN, I.N} Y., N. C1 REPLACEMENT COST ESTIMATE T.. AOlrhy Amount Unit Unh C.R E.Irnllon T.ee11n Donor IAI O A,,, ROW RIGHT Of WAY 14, Lriul A10ui1111on A Rebcetbn A+Utbn1, --- I3. Utujill Relocation (De+crbe unArr NOTES Cel-w 0 L.S. r 770 o. B S r. A 1390`_-' I, 180 IB) IA. [:1e111ntA Gru061nE I 3420 1 CV ?f. GRADING nd,IIaW i]. R--E.... 14?0 CV L ?00 GRADING Itl. Iturrpr,lnll. Nrul 19. om,l CoroP. UAISUI f. Exa. _ 2.300 ??3zo ICI DIIAI CL Gf 8 !J '` SS 74 Ton 3" 3 1 7 20 BASE BASE _ 20, a..., 31-7zo zS65 rpn St9 13,S8o (D) 21. [wNtl wrlallnt 0 Mlle SURFACING SURFACING jj, BST,CNUA -FK..crss?Frdrs?l j3. ACifOGC Tnn I,Soo 1 380 d L 01 1 E. CY / Z I O 11 1. ja, Chmn ImuR.aAPPRonCH P1 I O LL S-oSa _ 1.. n O 75. ) Cubes A 8°-+'48? (E) elcmnenaDNlnnpe,Nn,u,c 6- -1-70 DRAINAGE cl CUlrr?t A DNI. PI- Inna1NE YI RCHGS LI, j6 Rb- ?'-- Ton , 70X CULV. ' Lf S`79 DRAINAGE -1 33. SvultuNII-P1n20 IM1<I . 7090 Ea. 3J0 ltn+ Ch 11on i 11, 0 Mile a- nlA 1 trb wlUtnrl+ 1 Inleruc l I E u bn <i?` TRAFFIC . +L llna + . I 1 Lt. 19+ZOC TRAFFIC g UarenII,T,1r ...- MIN SERVICE IIIuml Omrr l t SY SUera r, Mlle ROADSIDE B,k. 2, WIRE T 1f?ETDV LI. ?- 1'010 DEVELOPMENT ____ fend.,. Ype l C L.S. 1' SLR ROADS IDC Onllo ]t. ErOUOn 1 ci DEVELOPMENT 39. L,-0 11 0 I O /0. Olhar REPLACEMENT CONSTRUCTION COSTS I.CATEGORV 13C3051 I IDENTIFICATION I!I ! I G .j; IY..A)?1 f !'''"''TT 1. county C? 1 , )1 !??Nw?!Mr ;.;,MP NNv 6 Lmin V.-IrfyMMe51YP••UnlmpmP4?Gn.MD nTO ACP/pCCO A. Il.tlraY rNN I•u 14. - 9,'T ?4 10 aW11N O'woui{ 0 1D. N.,.nhm lta, __ 11.' •I -rr tt !:,;. 12. 1 AM Right al Way Width A. 13. RA.-1 Y..?Nao RE PLACEM ENT COST ESTIMATE T.A C-i TmJ In Da- (A) RIGH TOF WAY 1•,LHW AVHI.L, ER.W1101- 15. Utility NOTE b,l,,) O W ROW (B) 16. CIUJ.SAmtgmv GRADING 17. R.,,I-E.c.,Ina,H,ul 3'L' IG,430 I A. B.N.., ma. H,m 122.o CY Z:3 3, 3 40 19. oma Co rv3P. UNS U,f 6)tC, Z, 5-30 GRADING 2 Y9o (C) BASE 70. e-vp. GRAVEL- CL, 3 `7440 Ton 3°O 3S7 qO BASE 35790 (D) 71. C,.mtl..a,.ml 29'3o T.n ! SSDD SURFACING 77, BST,Cb„A MII• A 28,390 33. ACP/PCC _ O Ton 7,. Cn,nnrl A DIt,A Ea,. CY Z70 2%..ICulwrt A Dwln Plp,,I111 AiimA,:4 Lt. 0 s0 1 IEI bl Lt. 83 27 DRAINAGE 0 C.Iwrt A Dr,ln FIN, inn,R,a ARCH FS u 16. Rlp„p . Ton ?Zq 17. Sou-., bM Ih,n 70' I...-30 CVL1/. Lt. .RAlNAGE 7E. oln•, O 160 79. Slln, E.. 3CT0 (F) 10, Sl,lpl & A Cn.nn•INalon MIN TRAFFIC 31. Sig.." IC.bl. Imrn.,. r/tlln,l, ) O I2ib SERVICES 37. Gu,r6„II.TYp• I n M Lt ZOO 19 _ 33. Illumin.lbn)9S •.bU llluminae6_?) Mil, , TRAFFIC S 31. oln., CNMJNGE.., 6ulDfPoETS RR E'/.JG 34 i 2 ?? o 3S. SWer•It.,?R,.r U. O SY IGI 11, Blk, panfRMUI O M11. ROADSIDE 37. T-1-T- 2 1 ZPC acro Ll 12 I, o 10 DEVELOPMENT 31, Ella.. C.nu.1 . L S 6.&D 1 19, L..-I.I O . . Au. ---<? 9 ROADSIDE DEVE O 40. Othw O L PMENT 2 / O I. r R'09-A (3$ - REPLACEMENT CONSTRUCTION COSTS I .CATEGORY IDEN7IEICATION ). CounlY Ir?? ,' 7. '1 Lu-?-? MI. tl ? 1. M/ to M? 6. lentrn C%ISTING GEDM{TRId it 1S i', B. RodrtY welt Mt 7.1h tYVO•UnlmOw?OnrA? {3T? AUIVCCO wt r l 0 I Mau •- O 10. No. o/ttrv lent _ Uwt Roil n3 ?/tfROYt 9. Y ? I n. A.+. eiw ar wtr %uln n. IT. BlktNml V"13 No? DOT .o.Nt ?l/It SUBTOTAL t--I L.35 A{601 INI ? Dttltn Entlnetrlnt 1110% • ConN..Ubn Endnwrint+t IS% GRANDTOTAL I L REPLACEMENT CONSTRUCTION COSTS 1. CATEGORY t 1 {I 71,I, ?. 104MIr ICAT10N ?+C4.- 1 •I? an1Y A S Nr Ii1 M1 6 L l1h ?j MI I N, i ERISTIINGGEOAOTRICS hT N w??UnlmD W GfR''A OSTOIA6jPCCO ?, 1 E, Ro1dr.Y .y1R bw ff? E LtlYJ? RaE sLlI Ek n ? ? r I0. Na. of l6rulwr I3' LL " 57, AN. RI6h1 a1 WHY YWIhr n. 13. B4. NrMi Y.+O No? REPLACEMENT COST ESTIMATE T..4 A,Ilr,ly Amounl Unlt Unl, Can E.Nnnm T.01n Dpllu. IAI RIGHT OF WAY 14.I..mf A,VUIUUVni R.b+Mbn A++IU.n<e O Aire 15. Illlllly Reb,Rlon (Da.,rwe under NOTE$eelor,) ------------ O L,S RO W O le) l6. CIN-I& Gr.0biq 1.70 All, ZA3Go GRADING 11. Rubw.yf.+., 1.,1. H.., 66Vo GY 33b Z3?ocro Itl, flu.or,in+l. N.ul /?/0 CY 271 ( 77 0- ' 19. Diner ?^aP UA3lVrT; ?I(C. A Zr 8So GRADING .g2 g p ICI BASE 90. B.n type ESRAVEL_ CL_Y _ /?7 Ton 39 8LD BASE 39 60 ID) TI. C"- wrO,bt 3 292 Ton SC7 17 -/•/o SURFACING 03. BST, CHNA Mlle _ A 690 33. ACP/PCC O Tpn SURFACING 9 / OO 24. Ch.n.el6 Ditch EM. CY Z/ O (E ,1 25..1 Cuernl A nllln PIp., MM.B,d Ap.-ao-q LT. - Soso ) N GE D e1 CVIru1 i DN1n PIPS 1-111 18V-R Yp` Lt -- , 902 RAI A YI CUIUNIi DNIn llp<, In+l.IleO iLrE[NE$ u, 6 3 36. RIpUp SO Ton ? 23.5rruUUreele++lh.n 10'IOnY ?IC.CULI/. Lt. Z.Q? DRAINAGE xe. Dm.r O 9 2 3 o 29, SIR., E.. G00 (F) 30. SHIP1.8 i Ch.nn.IIHH- Mile 740 TRAFFIC 31. $IYn.I+(C.HI. M..N?D../+IEnH. 1 ?_ uiibn SERVICES 31. G-dNll,TvP. / L,• )9, 2.00 )3. Illumin.lbn (%e.ln.Illumin.Md?) Mil. TRAFFIC SERVICES 3tl. omNCNALigCL. G1111Kram RRXIAIG 6 f , 27 I o l5. SWerdb,??R. rM. O SY IGI )6. BIIe DNhI/INII Q Mlla ROADSIDE , lyp. wI RE 33. Lt pt / O I / 0/ a DEVELOPMENT I_ 38 El. Lro+lpn G ...a.11o1 . L S Y )9, L.rM-,., . . All. ROADSIDE DEVE tl0. O,hn (? LOPMENT / C) SUBTOTAL / S / y 0 1x1 • 0N1En EnEln.edn{.110% • C-11.1lbn EnSl-ho N IS% GRANDTOTAL "'-lam n REPLACEMENT CONSTRUCTION COSTS I .CATEGORY K-oB-A 40 IDENTIFICATION 7. RPW NWn. ]. [ounly {. ROVt. NUrnblr S. MP IP MP 6 Len{1n ?? MI. EXISTING GEOME7RICS .' 7, P-NU Fvy- Unrmp-"OG-10 RST? ACPIPCC? 1. RPbw,Y waln -Nn 9. T-1n: L-10 A.111,,O Mounl.bR.ir.O 10. N-Itnru FVU, _ n. AOr 12. AM. RI{M of Wq rirlln n. 131 01 1.0 1.10 No ? REPLACEMENT COST ESTIMATE T.A ADN", Amount U- Unll l ul E.ununn TPI,I in Doll., IAI RlGIIT OF WA Y IFL-I Ar9ui11t1- A R'Ipl,liun AlUu...r A- - 15, 1111111Y R.Ipr,llon IDrl.lbr Pnx'r NOTLS b'lorl ROW Ix) In. CIr,rI.,6 Giupbin, 2'3o All, /J90 aA 3, 200 GRADING 11. Rn,Jw,Y Er.., In<I. 11,01 0 /Z90 CY 31, Z,10 u.p1 I, llnrrPw in, 1 z3 zo 2?? 6 340 , , . Conti UA15mT, FXd. 19 um _ Cy 1 2?0 3 GRADING . a ---- _ _ , 3 99 O Icl BASE E3RAUP? GL. B 17,372 3T. `ys76o x ASE AF5?8 0 IDI P, cr?mmlRn,Dn, 383 Ton S`s zo2$o SURFACING ll. US I, Cl-A O Mile 23. . CP cc Tpn 951Y 630 SURFACING I 1 a / o 14. I.n,nn.I. OiUn E.S. CY S 210 A 7S, ,I Culr'rt 6 01111 PIP', Inll,ll'J g LI, J!, O s0 (1) p N? Cu1r.1611r.in h- Inlt,Il.J -:7tY8• Lt. _ DRAINAGE .l C.I-. A nwl PUW,,P ,U, Ake-qgg L1 •. G 6 3 T 7n, Ripr,p .? . ton _ _I Zwy ?/ ? (,( 71. ?Irullur<11111-70'ton, 1-x CUIV. 11. 3, ZS'L DRAINAGE 7R. rRnrr ._.._.- Q _ Q 841) 19. Si,.F E,. (T) It. 1I110I 9 A Cn,nnrllr,llon -71.0 1 RAF PIC 31. Si,nal(E.I,I.Inlerlrc. w/ll,n,l, I uciln SERVICFS 11, f.n.Jr,ll. fYpe n Lt. 14 7.00 31. 11um1n,1an 1%r•III. IRUnun,IrJ ) MU, 7 - Sao TRAFFIC SERVICES _ I-SIIVJAh t" C%nDCPPS y R c k iG ay 4 D , z7 o 11. SMrw,n.,_n. war ?s?Y _ sV 7-'- -- 6,772 (G) )A, xilr p,l A,/INII, O Mlle ROADSIDE it. lrnrln,, TYPr I.I. I UEYFLOPMI141 3R, lronon Cannnl L.S. r 5 0p 39. L-'Pln, 0 All. , ROADSIDE DEVELOPMENT .n, Mt., O P-n =,-rrrt Iw I REPLACEMENT CONSTRUCTION COSTS (.CATEGORY R'07-Li (°FO IOENTWICATION F4. r IN 1, Co.." Ie NI ?l _ 6. l•npi, ?'7? i T I 1; yL? [RIFTING GEONETII?C{ YMINII fYpY•Unlmprpry L,I GN-Ii ASTE7 AcpIncp C) C3 E. Rotl J rryuklA -!M ' I ?. TM?I!1 lMl Refllni NRYr?N¢ie?Y ? _? f 10, Ho. el lAru lout II ADT j:? 12. A- 'tips of WYY ANN 0• 13. BIL•In ? Y"Ej (b? 1 L ZssL 3, 7-5't- DRAINAGE 770 E.. /I mSQ Aid. Lf. _ 1% 2-00 TRAFFIC mil. Z.40 GOO Lf. 1--s-1 1 010 I` ADIIDI SUBTOTAL Zy'67 Q 1111 • OeUSn EnLlneerlnS at 10% •COnltruclbn CnllnY•rlnS •111% GRAND TOTAL I _?J REPLACEMENT CONSTRUCTION COSTS I .CATEGORY r-07-A (4 0 IDENTIFICATION 1 Y1 7.r ..._ .1 .. ? 7. COUnIV l ('? I ? _ A. ?R"141 ?nbF Lim' 6. L,n11N ?J M1. EXISTING GEOMETQ= I 1.,h .py,?M1UnlmprorM?O ESTO AC{//000 1. RadrlMrbtA F.N f.,T S .u'S.IO ROnM101E 0 10. N-I,Nrul- 5?11.1AD7 1 17. Aw. RlpN of WFY ?WIA R. 15. RIk11Fn17 Y,IO NoO REPLACEMENT COST ESTIMATE TML A,.NNY A-M Un1, UM, C.H E1tlmlw TMtl In DellMr (A) RIGHT OF WAY 11.L,nA A[RU100-A R1b[+I61 A"111,n[1 O A- IS. UIIIIIY R.W.I. IDIK-uM,, NOTES b[brl ? L.S. - ROW O le) 16. CL+,InSAG,4bb¦ [ 2. If Z [r[ /39o p1 3,370 GRADING 17. Rn+A-VE-_I.,I.H,,I 80 7 CY 3 3z,sso It. Borror,ln[I,N,uI ' 1 7-440 CY VU 6,670 GRADING 19. oN" CaFLTP. /UA."...,,,i 3,31- ZoO IL) BASE 20. 6+11YD1 Q,R,AV6L CL. S ,21372 Ten 3T° 46-7 O BASE [f 760 (D) 21. C-M wf4d" 3834 Ten SL9 zo zBo SURFACING ]] NST CHMA 0 MIN SURF C NG , ]3. Ac cc Ten 9 S3D A I I 1 Af $ 1.0 ],. Ch-,l A DII[N EA[. CY S 2/ O 25. +) C.l-I A O,.ln Piq, I-,1I,d AI°-'(e*4HcW Lt. 6, 060 IE) b)CUlrln A D,AI Pip,, In11+111A 8*-VI KB1 Lt. 16.987 DRAINAGE [ICu111r, A DrFIn Pia, In11,I11A 4t"45 11 NlpraD ?- ?, /Y _5 Lt, Ton 7Z?7 ?_6_/_/63[f`•! [AZT 77. 51rv[1ur11 I- 0,,,, 70'1"nl Lt. '3, 2S2 DRAINAGE ]b. Om[, 3 77 0 29. Sltn, E+. I/bu'o IF) TRAFFIC 30. Stoplnl i [Nwntllallon M. 51tn+111E11n.InHrv[. r/111nN[ ) MIN wcib `82 /J 00 SERVICES 32. C,u,rEr,II,TYP[ 1 n Lt• Z0O 33. IIIUmMFFbn I%e[R,.Illumin,rtl ) MII1 mo ? TRAFFIC SERVICES 34. O1Ner CNANA(a•.AGVIDEfa37'3,_ RR 10A16 y 7?5 -7 3S. Sblr,lkl,A. rb, i 1 1 1 SY / v -f f 3, S?`l IGI 36. BIk10,IN[/Ir+IN '0/ MII1 zowo -Z-&o ROADSIDE )1. f,n[Int, TYO[? I.JIRE ?Q? Lt, 10/ O I,01 DEVELOPMENT 19. EID11-U.-I L.S. 5brO J 39, L,nOHFDln1 A- , ROADSIDE DEVELOPMENT Fa. o1N" a p SUBTOTAL 31?406-0? INI L-?1?.L-3--? • D1Ytn Entlnelrlnt+t 10% II ,?_ ,•?1 I ' •CDm,wObn En111w1rb1FI IS% `-?, GRANDTOTAL 00T F" - - - 0 REPLACEMENT CONSTRUCTION COSTS 1, CATEGORY V-I ?/'-(3(30 IOENTIFICATIQN 1 MI r 19 Mp? 1. Co.." 6. L.n{In MI, - / 4XUTINO OEOM[TRICf r 4 7P..nMllryp.•Dnlmplor9d?j Gn 9y0 !!T0 ACTlPCc? { T TMII.IIL.wI? 0.ollly ??RFVn ? . gotl rry rMRl 11 IA., ..1 17. Aq. RI{nl el Wry rMM D• Il. !%. Hn.l Y.r? No? - REPLACEMENT COST ESTIMATE T.W ADIr IIY Amnunl 0.1I LPN, C." EM.mlen T.Wlh IAI -'-' Doll- RIGHTOF WAY In,l.nf A[9unlNOnf R.b[.Fbn AIIIII,- A[re IJ. IIIIIIJ•R.bcrllpn(DHCrb. um.r NOTESW- LS __ _-ROW (B) 16. Clr,lln{ A G,ur bin{ /. 3 3 All, ` 1390 `i /. Q s0 l ,.' i GRADING Il. Rn.6 r.Y Enc., In[I. N.uI 380 CV 33f /Q,070 1Iti IB Barrp., ln[I. Hrul l3`/'O / CY 670 -:? 3 19. Olnar COM/. OA!$O17; ?)(C. GRADING Z, 610 a) 2GZOo BASE 70. e.H 1Yp. GISAVCL CL, 3 9660 Ten 7 3.r-74-. BASE (D) 3 740 71. CIU.11rJ wrNCln1 2930 SU Tnn E 9 S ! S, Soo - RFACING 77. BST,CNxA Mil. , 3 /co ZA -'-- SDRf AC N ...? - 7J. ACP/PC[ CD To I G / n 90 74. c6,nnd s mI<n En[. cv 5 2/ o 75. .I [YIYOIAD010 Plpq lnntll.OAffRIAC4 (EI LI. 10, loo f - f el[W-141Dnln Plphlo,lmm "-icer Ll. DRAINAGE [I [ulna ADrrln llp.,ImNIbA ARWrS Lt. 61140 L 76 aipr.p / -?'=- To ? ' 71 Snu[IU1n Ill lnln 70•IOn ae1C COLS. / ' Lt. 2,785 DRAINAGE • L,"7 ]I. OIe.r 57e.Era DIRA•Nt ZO.r 10 0 9 p90 79. Si,,, Er. (eG0 _ IF) le Slrlpin{6 Cernn.Ill.Hnn __?_ Mlle 647 TRAFFIC ll. Sixn.I.IEAI.1.InNrvc.rHlln.l. I Kiib / SERVICES 17. Golld'.II,TYD. n L/. IZI (BOO ' f . 33Illuminrlbn f%..W. 111umIn,IM? I MII -] ?U TRAFFIC ? - ?. )r, OIn.r CN,W,)" (6VIDl's7T R . IZ Z7- SERVICES --I- 516.r.ISI,_?R.rbs - O _ Icl le Rn. wle4u.m p SV Moe ROADSIDE 11. TI, .. D[v[LOVneFNr ]{, bmlon Co..,., Lr. L.S. / ot7 19. L.nJNrplnl O ROADSIDE 10 OIA.r 0 All. DEVELOPMENT SIIBTOTAL Z I O JrO (11 ) •C.n.Irv[Ibn EnllM.rln1.115% -T?1--I . NOTCS GRANDTOTAL*yy? _ DOT Yo.. .. !ice-?.^"_._ ...._ .... .. . ?°rrm?aT4RM..r'?9R'Oli°.y10'i4f.L'7J??fLN?J1Ia ?.nwnr' ^^'_'_'__ I REPLACEMENT CONSTRUCTION COSTS 1. CATEGORY IDENTIFICATION 1. C.", s. Mr "Ml _, a. Lmstn? MI. =:?'; EXISTd O Gt;RPp O ESTO ACFJKC? GYOU10. No.o/tntulw. IT. Aw. RIiX1ol W,Y VWN `- to. 13- Y.10 N.0 l r -l i 9 i i ? [R!lTIMC aEOM4T?p 6 A , q, 1, )h) Unl oNNH ] ON., !ST O A(ynaC? S'1?r ?' S, Rotlray rUN MI Y ? ? 1 , t p IIM[v J4Rn 0 10. No. a/lnrv lmu. . y 71•i 1 T ' ' - .. 7r1 AYE, Of wPYr IJ. EIb. IMNJ Y.13 NoO REPLACEMENT COST ESTIMATE T+? A.IFIIY Amount UnN Unl. C.M E_, T.,, In (A) RIGHT Of WAY I+,I.rW A'011111on A RSWIIIbn Al.i.l..l. A- IS. LIMIT R.1r0-(p.UrWe und.r NOTES brlor) ? L S _ ROW . . 0 (el 16. CI1,rINAGrubbinJ 1 . 0 7 A.r. 139 0t' 2,360 GRADING IJ. Rptlr.Y [.a., In51. N.ul G ' '1I ?OT?J CY ?, 3;_ Z3 OET0 IB. nnrror,lnq. rout /7tD CY J 1*70 19. om.r ?'^'P UNSwT F-XC. 2 Q GRADING G D 3 $ (c) BASE GRA1/¢L- CL. II /077 mn 39860 BASE 398 0 (D) 21. Cm.btl wrunnE 3292 rnn szv /7,'}10 SURFACING 72. BST, CNS.A Mile 31 (690 ]). ACY/YCC O Ton SURFACING °/00 7.. [n.nMl A OI¢A EAp. CY L/ o 1s. .I CUIVUI a Ortln P,-m,,.ij.! o C LL lo) f o0 (E) b) C,l ,t A 01,11 Plp., imuD.a Yy 4 B' LL / Z69 DRAINAGE 11 011-1 A DUI. PIp ,1.11.II.E A.ICIEOS Lr, 6 349 lA. RIp1,C Ton /?47 ?z 11. SIN1In1+.111, n 20' lent TOK OU?V: ll. 2r 97 Z DRAINAGE 7R, orn.r S'T'ORM 'D24.AJi 40,200 07 O 19. Slim E.. ?. sDfl (F) 30. SUIpInS A Cn.nm11111bn Mil. _ 760 TRAFFIC 71, SISmN(E.IM. In1.rN(. r,/.INNI ) _.__ .iiibn 3 SERVICES 37. G-d,,IljT 1 Ll. /Z/ 6Q0 lJ. IIIUmIn.lbn l%.nlN.lllumin.ltl 1 N. TRAFFIC SERV S JJ. mw CMA-JVZl,,6UIDCP0JlT RRwAk ICE 00 JS. SMwll.,_ ft. W. :Id Q SY (GI p.in./1r.ll. 16. o Z- MIN ZO lT00 '?11 T? ROADSIDE Jl. I...I... TYw O DEVELOPMENT JL. troYOn COnllol L.S. / b0 J9 . L.rrlu.plnC 0 AU. ROADSIDE DEVELOPMENT .o. otn.r __? 900 SUBTOTAL 7y 60 N) r D.rlSn EnSln1,rinE.t IO% . [anNrvObn EnSlnaftj.1 IS% GRAND TOTAL 11h1 REPLACEMENT CONSTRUCTION COSTS ) CATEGORY U-f 7-4 C44 h ' ? I ' ifil ?•c 3. County ?? 4 ZIQImWr 3 / S. MP W MP 6. Lrnnn ?] M1. I '.li'' [%UTING GEDM[iNG I N. _ 7.Ir.yanaM nw•UnlmDrov dl-1 13 [STD AEY/rcc? [. R...,, •a1A ,NM ti r,l T.t*.L..+10 RoIOnA? Mounu4wV1? 10. N-411Iruluw 11. ADT 9 r ?''' 17. AvA, RIEht O1W.Y."1 R. 13, BILe lane? Y..?ND? REPLACEMENT COST ESTIMATE T..R Attl.uV Amount Unlt Unlt C.N EM.n+l.n I TaU In Be- IA) RIGHT OF WAY 14.1-- AreuNlllon A Reloa+t,on AW6-11 O A- IS. UIIIIty R.Wlatlol(la We under NOTES belo.) L.S. ROW IB) 15. CI-I"IAGIU1bMl Aur 040 '-{ GRADING Il. R.W- E.1., Mel, N+ul ??y730 CY ? 1 3 yI.O is, Borro.,Ind,H+ul z930 cy Q.93 010 19 Oln.r Com P. UA15Jr'r 3,630 GRADING /OO ICI DASE 30. n'.1- GIT4r/6L.. C", 3 13,456 Tan 3'-• 419790 B _ ASE 974'0 ID) 31. C-W w""I" ?I f 46 Ten SZs Z2, 200 SURFACING 31, BST,CI+..A O MIN 33. Ey cc Tnn 103,900 SURFACING 00 ].. Gn+nnN A DII<h E.C. Cy S Z) o 13. A Culvt,t a Dal, PIP" I,-II.d APPROACH LI, (E) b) Cuhert A Dail Pipe, 11.111rd B"-+4[l Ll. / li l DRAINAGE 1) ClIllf A Drain PIP., IA11,11ed AIUA"i Ll lI'' b 6zT 36. Rlpap 0 . Ton ?ZY7 6z? 37. SI-1..e. ItHlh+n10'ID.E CUL.V. Lf. -3. 4 3 DRAINAGE 38. Omer STDAM "D RAW9 __ O Zoo. °JO 39. fllnf E+. ? 74D IFI 30, Stripin, A Cb.nnelle+tlDn Mllr __ . L 6 1 7 TRAFFIC 31. $Iln11t IEAIn.InUrwc../.Iln+l. 1 unib ?+ ? { ? ••= " SERVICES 32. Gu+rdr+11,71Pe 1 n Lf I -- /2,da0 31. 1llum1n+ibnl%seln. Illun,In+Itd ) . Mlle TRAFFIC SERVICES , 3/. Oln+r CFIAArr/TL., GN OCFet i? RR 10v14 { cFZ '? 810 11, Sae.tlaD, fl. We /L67 qy 1 Z•r- 20 1 3 6 (G) l6. B11e p+th+/tr+ll. . O Z. MIN ?! QOM ?? ?., .? ROADSIDE 3/. Endo{, Type O Lf DEVELOPMENT 36, Erollon Control . LS 1 •? CO 39, L+rau+Dlnl , A". ROADSIDE DEVELOPMENT 6d, OIn., O Z O SUBTOTAL / O INI • DIM" E.81 .... 1..., 10% -C ..+vull an EnllnaerlnE+t I s% GRAND TOTAL I( REPLACEMENT CONSTRUCT ION COSTS . ,,.. ---•-?._ 1. CATEGORY (J-I6-$?4° ' • i! IDENTIFICATION 11 f Rod (RAID 1. RwYMiMV 5. CoumY 7, MI bM1 A. Lrnttn MI. EXISTING GEOMETRIC T•I IYY "I IYp • UnIM-41 O GnvW 0 BST O ACI/YGC? ` 7. Tw l IIIt EYwlO RoI11n1? SbuntWwY,? I 1. RDYDr+y rNlA /wl ? ' p . I I, ADT ] lfl 10. ND. of lnrvlw+ t 17. AM. RIIAIo/WYYWW(x M1 , Il. IIk. I,n.t Vn?NO? RE/LACEMEhTCOSTESTIMATE Two A111r11Y Amount IA) Unx Unk Cwl Evlvn,lon Tw,l In DDllu+ RIGHT OF WAY IY.L+M AIOU1.lIlon 6 R+bl,Nun ANIN+nI O 15. UUIxY Rvbl,Ilon lDwcrlp. urWer NOTES brlarl _- L.S. NOW (0) IA. Clllllnl A Grupbin/ 2.4•Z GRADING I1 N L AI„ /390 3, 370 o . e nWw,yE.a.,In11.N,ul 97$Q 11 M C,Y3 3c 3z !O ? . urruw, Inc" N,ul Z440 CoFD1O 19 om J _ J cY 27J -- 6, 670 . er , Ul SUIT. y (C) BASE 20. B„e1DGFtYAULL CL. 13 IZ 372 3,310 GRADING 6200 I - I Ton 3I_ I yf7130 BAfE _ (D) ]I. Cru........ 7 383 S?9 Yf 76 O j" SURFACING ]]. 851, Chu A run Zo, LQo - 23. AC//ICC O Mlle 36.bso SURFACING k ].. cn+nnNADnlnE.1. Ton 930 25. 11 Cotten A Doln IIDV, 1w111e0 A/PApAW fEl CY GS. ZI O N Culrtn A Dawn IIDe, lwl,ll.a 83y yB• Ll. /o /oo DRAINAGC cl Culuvn A Ur,ln II ARCNQS De, InN,INY Ll. /6, SQ j - Ton L7 Z - ]J. SNUUUre, I.,.In,n)0• 1, 13.1( CUL? rp ]x. 011h., S"T`DItw9 ^?RhenJ ? l J LI. DRAINAGE (F) 30, SINDInY A Cn,nnvllNNOn I.,. TRAFFIC P. SIR-,],(E.NI.InwIW1.V/,IYn,I+ 1 MIN f yZ6 I 5E0.VICE5 )1. Gu,rJr,II,TYO. cibn 6g? w ]]. ummb+.bn lx.Rla.xwmbn.x - u. IZ, 600 Mi1• TRAFFIC ..? 1Y. Olnt. C4.:gly((w A (,(T/N6 ?aL? SERVICES = 3s. sMernL., 1 -? lo 7 3o IGI SY _. JA BlEe wln4lr,n+ RDAOSIDE 37 Fv111 •0r T Mile ?•Q7'? 1, . q. YD.?___-_ OL Q VELOIMEN I - ]I. CrwlDn Control LI. I 59. L+ndN,Dlnl L.S. I, SQQ {( A .B. Olne. ll, 2 S? n rROADSIDE vr,,...._.._ I -. REPLACEMENT CONSTRUCTION COSTS I .CATEGORY U'16? 60 SUBTOTAL ?--Y-?-' 1x1 • D..IIn Enllneerln/.110% ^ • Con.lr.0bn Enllnluln/•115% GRANOTOTAL -f-- -#-`-?' mENTO:c9LTwN Tyw F a rA Y _ ). C-11 I . a 6.r 6. MI %MP 6. L.npn I? MI. EXISTING GEOMITIICS T., P. aw•U..,.,.OGn q EST C3 ACPIP000 E. Rom.sywWtn MI e• ?i 9: Twa :LMIO RHIIryO Mo.n"HO 10, No. oI th. I-, _ .;,!?F;• DT?:1'•. It. Aft. Right oIW.VwMln n. IS. Elk. b..1 Y.I0 N. CI REPLACEMENT COST ESTIMATE T..L A[Il.lly ? A--1 Unll LIM, C.. E.I.n.l.n Tw.l In Della[ (Al 1. LIrW A[VUI.IIIonf R.b[.Ilon A.R.In[< A[ie R RIGHT Of WAY . If. IIIIIIIY R.b[Mion lD.Nrlee urM.INOTLS 6.low) -? L.S. -- OW Q G.Adnl A G..pbl.. 16 4. b! A[,. 1390 1400 IBI GRADING . 11. R--yE.[.,1111.HI.1 / 680 CY -3 3T ('Z'4zo InH. HIVI 11orr.w 19 J4( ? CV 279 LZ, 680 GRADING , . 19. DIN.[ gZ' U.USUIT• EXC. 720_ ` 2 0 (C) 01u111. C3RAVRSL GL. Y 70 -- 17798 Ton 3-v 651,13P BASE BATE . (. S8 0 . lo) tI. c..m.a.mN[lnt S64 T.. $=s 29/ 860 SURFACING 1151 Cf-A 71 ? Mil. SURFACING , . t). OPCC T.n ) `'ro. 0t5o 16 9 8 6 0 ).. Cn.... I A 01uh E.[. CY 7r ZlO o A [ fPN H 2S. I)COY- { Dr[1n PIP., InaIILA IF LL IO,/00 IE) ' [F ? ? 6) C.1-1 d D,.ln Ft", I.-ll.d Vy?p Lt. ZZ17 I( F DRAINAGE _ [)CUlv.rl{DrUn llw,In.HIHd pltn•1ES 36. 0.1PHp - Lt. Ton .?-7 /?-3 t). S.u<lure. Ie.I IS.n tO'lon)BOX C.ULI? Lt L1 DRAINAGE 18. Dln.r STerCn 'DAA[.V s (-0-400 / O / O 29. St... EI. Z, 2C0 )0. Sul,ft ALA.... IIrI11.n MII. I, I Ifl FFIC Sl.n.n lE.ltl. InHru[. w(.Iln.ll 1 )I u?lb Q Y r ? TRA SERVICES . )t. fwrdr.ll,TVP. / n Lt. ?? J ??p TRAFFIC )). Illumin.rbn l%..NI.Illuminn.d_) M. SERVICES ).. OrnN CNR.INLG. 6'0[OCV631T, RR %/[V6 16, 1 3 ZO )S. TM[w.lk"-ft .N[ Z22Z SY ? L19 27, 069 (G) 36. BIL.P.0,11.111 .0S MII. ZOGTFV 1, bao, ROADSIDE m F-ft, T- Q Lt. DEVELOPMENT )S E-I.nC -.I L T -- DSIDE . 39. L.ndu.Dlnf . . Au. Z 00 ROA DEVELOPMENT .0. 0.- O REPLACEMENT CONSTRUCTION COSTS I.CATEGORY r. I IOENTIfICAT1oN 1. Coun lY wr to ver --may 6. Lmpn E%wTIM GEOwETRICS 7•I hE Ey ?YW'UnlmOrortl O G-W BST0 ACr/TCCO t?G E R ?` O T , otlraY r yln Iwl . L4w10 RolllnE l' E7 wouliwpR•, 0 IB NO oI1N I `` I1. ADT, 'f , . rv 17. Aw. JUAI of Way rWDI R arN1 _ • i), BIk?I-? Y..0 No0 j 1 SERVICES 32. C-NIIIII.Typ. 1 Z (Sao f 3.1. TRAFFIC ROADSIDE kilt, is. L 39. L.S. ROADSIDE All. Z, $760 DEVELOPMENT SUBTOTAL 879LF•p INI • Unlln Erglnallnl 1110% • COnrUU<Ibn EnllnrnrlnE It I f % NOTES GRAND TOTAL our 1 REPLACEMENT CONSTRUCTION COSTS 1, CATEGORY U-f S- bo) 1 IDENTIFICATION S 7?'ll I? 2IRya 3. Coumr (_ J A Mr I - S. MP fd MP b. Lenten EXISTING GEOMETRICS 7-I ?A IYD. • UnlmDhP,.dp G,,W O BST O ACGfPCC O E. ROtlw1Y wW,h /D,I 1 1; 4:T "0 RDnln50 Mouep/AOY,? 10, ND. of Toro lulu 11. ADT 13. A". Rltnl Of WAY WWO fl. 13. 8A.1-it Y,10 N.0 REPLACEMENT CUST ESTIMATE A.,I,IIY Amount Unll U.11 Cml F+,.n,lun TgJln Den,N (A) -. I' W11Inn4 R-10.n Af,lll,ms - Al AO. ROW RIGIITOF WAY . c IS. UIIIIIYR.b[ulOn(DD[IU. YN7,I NOTES b,lnw) O L.S. O at.,m ACrnnbint a 2,?2 All, 13So`=' 3,370 el GRADING . t n. Rntlw+Y E a., 1.0. N1W 7 0 CY ?j36 2 ?o ln[I. IUvI Rnnow Ix Z,44o CV 2'3 (O/ 070 GRADING , . r,. omw Com P, UNSOf'T ?,{c. 3,310 Zoo _ ICI 9+1IYP. GrtAJCL C'_L. B 20 17,778 Tun 3Te b?e 5-0 tlA5[ BASE _- . --"'-- 8 50 IDI 31 4ulhtl wrl¢In1 ------ ??? Tun 5-' - Z9, 860 SURFACING , CI+,IA UST O MII, SURFACING , 3d.I!nyYCC TOh fyo,ODO ro986o Ch,nnu A Ditch Ent 3+ CY 's, ZIO . . imulled APP1CeACS/ Is C.,,.,, A Dr+in Pl , -- Lt 10, 1Do (El , D hl C.1..06 DrtlA ViDt, lh-U.d $,y 48+ * Lf. 25-71/ DRAINAGE q CuMn A Doln FlwJnfl+Iltd gRWES 36. NIDNp -? Lf Ton !fi 21.61ru<lur.f l.u lh+n 20'IOnS BOX CL7L?. LI n pRAINAGE tt. oln., sToF,L- ?featNS ?° S°O 0 9 / o 3N S".. E.. 3• ?? . 3n sUlDlntA Ch,nn,lU,llon MII. lie . w/Ulnull 1 Sitn+l,( E+I,1 In1.rM[ 31 u[ik TRAFFIC V CES . . . C:u„dr,II 31 TYD. / n LT. += 1 TRAFFIC SER I . , -- ll IIIUmIn,IWn l%e.W1 111Nmin+ltl ) Milt . SERVICES . . ? N. anu CllANNG4. 6JIDLIdIjj R? R X/,?G 1 ( 1 O n.rk. 33. Sld<r+Df, 7;'7-2Z, SY 1219 Z7 087 (GI _ 3 II D.IMI„+Ilr b. , IL, "I I ^ roo Milt zCtf= 6m RUADSIDE f 33 . t, TYDf 0 LE DEVELOPMENT 3R ErD,ldn Cnn NUI L S 1 ROADSIDE . 39 I ,rtlu+Dlnt . . A[r. DLVELOPMENT . . t0. OIh., O I - , r - K I .I? I F . LL I I. ' - _ , •'.?'...?.. '? ? ? I. Utllit vRelocn ?n IUc,u tie m,).. V(l"I 65.?rloo _____ ? :_: , __ .-...5 _.__ _c_. F„ I I , , I - I I - I I r , I -- f I K `J 1L 'C ' { .., _L ? ._I ?nccrnt ,115. i?.llt?n Ln? Do r } IDENTIFICATION Road Names 3. County 4. "Route Number S. NIP. to Nip 6. Length MI. REPLACEMENT CONSTRUCTION COSTS ],CATEGORY 2'100 = ?z? - EXISTING GEOMLTRICS 7. Pasemcnt type - Unimproved ? G-0 ? BST ??ACP/PCC ? 8. Roadway wld It t'. fca ii_. ?'rJ 9: Terraln: Level ? Rolling ? Mountainous ? - 10., No. of thru lanes 11, ADT 12. Ave. Right of Way width (t. - " 13, tl ko I n Y<s ? h ? ; REPLACEMENT COST ESTIMATE Task Activity Amnu:[[ ..it ..it Cnst Extcnslon Total in Dollar (A) 14.1--d Acquisition & Relocation Assistance Acre R CV RIGHT OF WAY O n 15. U61Hy Relocation (Describe under NOTES below) L.S. B 16. Clearing 5 Grubbing Acre ?C K?CJ "'17 /7 ( ) GRADING 17. Roadway Exc. incl. Haul ?'- CY = I I ?? 1 , incl. Haul Borrow 18 CY GRADING . , 19. Other_ C-D 7. 5 CI 2C. Base typ Ton ?.(7 BASE BASE (D) 21. Crushed surfacing Ton SURFACING 22 BST Cl-A Mile 779 / ??077? SURFACING . , , - 23. ACP/PCC - Ton C? Z y FO e-I 21. Channel & Ditch Exc. CY r) - _ a) Culvert & Drain Pipe Installed 25 Lf, (E) , . b) Culvert & Drain Pipe in-led Lf. DRAINAGE c) Culver[ & Drain Pipe, ins[alfed - ?(7 L!. 26. Rlprap ?r Ton -7 27. Structures less then 20' long y? Lt. DRAINAGE ' 28. Other i O u 5 29. Signs Ea. r)o (F) 30. Striping & Channel ration I Mile 11 O' I I D - IC F goals Sig-l, (Exst. Im-ee. w/s' 3; V TRA F SERVICES . 32. G-dnl; type - ec[ On s Lf. 33 Illuminatlon(% exist diurninated ) Mile C TRAFFIC SERVICES . . ft. wide 35 Sidewalks = Sy C_i (J (G) , 36. Blke Paths/trails Ci Mile ROADSIDE 37. Fencing Type - Lf. O DEVELOPMENT , 39 Erosion Control L.S. DSIDE O 39. Landscaping r, Acre (i A R DEVELOPMENT ggg ¢ 1 3.4. Other r`-, (i ? I I '. 40. Omer ?> /'> f'' Ll L V O a 1 c. IDENTIFICATION 2. Road Name V?'CttiJt9_s, 3. County 4. Route Number : S. MP. ` to MP 6, Length Mi. t REPLACEMENT CONSTRUCTION COSTS 1. CATEGORI' -U o0 p (_ ?:? f EXISTING GEOMETRICS 7. Pavement type= Unimproved ? Gravel ? BST ? ACP/PCC ? 8. Roadway width _I 7t feet ?j (fo -- 9. Terrain: Level ? Ro111ng ED Mountalmi 10. No.ofthru lanes • - 1 1. ADT 12. Ave, Right of Way width ft.`.. 13.. Bike lane] Yes ? No ? REPLACEMENT COST ESTIMATE Task Activity Amount Unit Unit Cost Extension Total In Dollars (A) RIGHT OF WAY 14, Land Acquisition & Relocation Assistance Acre 15. Utility Relocation (Describe under NOTES below) L.S. (B) 16. Clearing & Grubbing 3,(P4 Acre ?-000 7Z''SC GRADING 17, Roadway Exc., incl. Haul CY / 2 S s 18. Borrow, incl. Haul O CY O O 19. Other GRADING Ic) BASE lZ"GJ 3 Cet Ova ( 20. Base type g9gf3 Ton e-- j 1 9 , BASE (D) 21. Crushed surfacing J-?_ Ton _S°0 c? p _I 1q / 7 SURFACING 22. BST, Class A /7Co00-ye l Mile IOS?.Lnn )q3D SURFACING 23. ACP/PCC n Ton d Z ?' 24. Channel & Ditch Exc. yQ CY y ?•' 25. a) Culvert & Drain Pipe, Installed Rd.Nmr.c<rlv. Z- I U Lf, --=-s"= ) 9 O (E) y_ra`r. b) Culvert & Drain Pipe, Installe -,I,. d r - Z L/ 0 Lf u yD?sO DRAINAGE i-LAr" r74..1 c) Culvert & Drain Pipe, Installed A -tofu (r0 , Lf. 1 1 > /"n 26. Riprap 1 D O Ton 27. Structures less than 20'long O Lf O O DRAINAGE 28. Other . o_ Q 29. Signs 7 Ea. ?O ou 7_ 9,C? (F) 30. Striping & Channeiiaallon // _ Mlle I / U _`? I 1 rJ TRAFFIC 31. Signals (Exist. Intersec, w/signals ) at r U "_ SERVICES 32. Guardrall,Type s LL C7 (j 33. Illumination(%exist, Illuminated ) Mile G d TRAFFIC 34, Other 0 SERVICES 35. Sidewalks, ft. wide SY U (? (G) 36. Bike paths/tells Mile U 6 ROADSIDE 37. Fencing,TYpe_ .T [/ cthf'2 F.U Lf, ZyU DEVELOPMENT 38• Erosion Control L.S. C7 U 39. Landscaping (! Acre 0 ROADSIDE DEVELOPM . Other J ? f - r F _. ' h - - - - - _ ENT - 3 v SUBTOTAL t'•'% '^ In (H) * Design Engineering at 10% Z. -Construction Engineering at 15% GRANDTOTAL ?OJ NOTES OOT mesa 140.032 1/71 V....---- _ " --- ----..-.-.....,.,-.-?..,-.w.,....ss,,N,v,?.r.acea?n aa'7??.v/y??',?.•?; bT6i-?i n''.,"w."?'!t r? uePN REPLACEMENT CONSTRUCTION COSTS r 1. CATEGORY J? J/?U 3U , IDENTIFICATION 2. Road Name r `?v?'N?\?''d"'C?? 3. County .tL;tQr50v._ 4. Route Number 5. MP to MP 6. Length ? Mi. EXISTING GEOMETRICS - ?? 7, Pavement type = Unimproved ? Gravel ? BST ? ACP/PCC ? 8. Roadway width )) r_ (ar feet 9. ?(O?O F Terrain: Level ? Rolting htoun[alnous? 10.. No. of thru lanes s REPLACEMENT COST ESTIMATE Task Activity Amount Unit Unit Cost Extension Total In Dollars RIGHT OF WAY 14.Land Acquisition & Relocation Assistance Acre 15. Utility Relocation (Describe under NOTES below) L.S. OW (B) 16. Clearing & Grubbing ,17?1 Acre ZGdO 10. (n /r0 GRADING 17. Roadway Exc., Incl. Haut _/$,1f;p0 CY y') 15-00 18. Borrow, incl. Haul CY 19. Other GRADING (C) BASE ( "cl.l3 frraya / 20. Base type ? EDOF-2 Ton \q '1 7 BASE (o (D) 21. Crushed surfacing Ton s- q)?S SURFACING 22. BST,CI-A 17000y' I Mlle Iq.2-k,U 1?3?U 23. ACP/PCC Ton U --?- O SURFACING 24. Channel &Ditch Exc. 7(] CY 25. a) Culvert & Drain Pipe, Installed lut. s1+o --kv. /&t:1 Lf. 7 ? 117 (E) b-1B"Tr.l s+v.t b) Culvert & Drain Pipe, Installed ?. 1y 3l0 C;) LL 17 =v (nl'- 0 DRAINAGE c) Culvert & Drain Pipe, Installed x-ustV. Lf ZI °- 7.ri ZO 26. Riprap /150 . Ton 27. Structures less than 20' long ?L Lt DRAINAGE 28. Other r] . y O Z z Z (° 29. Signs Ea. (F) 30. Striping & Channellutlon Mlle TRAFFIC 31. Signals (Exist. Intersec. w/signals ) C? Inier' Q O SERVICES 32. Guardrail, Type sec ion Lf (:? r) 33. Illuminatlon(% exist. Illuminated ) G . Mlle ?) C) TRAFFIC SERVICES 34. Other b 3S. Sidewalks, ft. wide SY (G) 36. Bike paths/tralls Mlle ? l) ROADSIDE 37, Fencing, Type 77- 1.(i(r-a SLSo Lf. DEVELOPMENT 38. Erosion Control C? L S ) ? C.? 39. Landscaping O . . Acre - G% y ROADSIDE DEVELOPMENT 40. Other 1 E L 11, ADT 12, Ave. Right of Way width ft. 13. Bike lane? Yes ? No ? C I 8 IDENTIFICATION 2. Road Name ZJ1ti :?•?.?LL ?, 3. County ?vC CSr T,. 4. Route Number 5. MP to MP - 6. Length 1:::? MI. EXISTING GEOMETRICS - 0 7. Pavement type =Unimproved ? Gravel ? BST ? ACP/PCC ? B. Roadway width )n' feet 3 r C> 9, -Terrain: Level? Rolling? M1tountalnous? 10. No. of thru lanes 1 I. qDT 12. Ave. Right of Way width ft. 13. Bike lane? Yes ? No ? - REPLACEMENT COST ESTIMATE Task Activity Amount Unit Unit Cost Extension Total In Dollars (A) RIGHT OF WAY 14.1-and Acquisition & Relocation Assistance Acre 1 15. Utility Relocation (Describe under NOTES below) L5. W ) (B) 16. Clearing & Grubbing '" ' o Acre ?Cco ) Zd 2. d GRADING 17. Roadway Exc., incl. Haul 2f,31 3 CY ( !!?' I Z7 18. Borrow, incl. Haul C CY y NG 19. Other O y GRADI 3 3 4 5 (C) BASE 20. Base type LZ ?rG) Fri C ra.va Ton BASE ) 7 (D) 21. Crushed surfacing / 39 Ton _ rn? p SURFACING 22• BST, Class A 17,Gb0ye ? Mile )s;a('C.7 1 q 3(U(j 23. ACP/PCC Ton C] <D SURFACING Z 24. Channel & Ditch Exc. r? v CY Z.cI U 25. ) Culvert & Drain Pipe, Installed; a, uoo.- r. )v - / L fo Lf, 7 -° 9 g Z• (E) : ) b)Culvert& Drain Pipe, InstalleA '171- 1 ?r IDQ DRAINAGE C) Culvert & Drain Pipe, Installed r -c-)v. 0_ Lf• Z/ rxa - ?j yU 26. Riprap ?(] Ton 27. Structures less than 20' long ? Lf ? DRAINAGE 28. Other . . . U © z 29. Signs Ea, t?C°-`- 7!?O (F) 30. Striping& Channellzatlon Mi)e f.4 ) ID )) U TRAFFIC 31. Signals (Exist. intersec. w/signals ) Q Inter• O O SERVICES 32. Guard rail, Type section Lf. U ' 33. Illumination (% exist. Illuminated ) _ O Mlle U TRAFFIC SERVICES 34• Other 35. Sidewalks, ft. wide C% SY L) C:? (G) 36. Bike Paths/trails mile ROADSIDE 37. Fencing, Type 17 t.vrrd_. 5Z Lf. ) 1S 91 y0 DEVELOPMENT 38. Erosion Control O L S. f % f? 39. Landscaping . Acre r+ ROADSIDE DEVELOPMENT 40. Other r r7 1 z IDENTIFICATION 2, Road Name 3. County 4. Route Number S. MP - to NIP 6. Length --??? Mi. REPLACEMENT CONSTRUCTION COSTS 1. CATEGORY I ? - EXISTING GEOMETRICS _ I t 7. Pavement type =Unimproved ? Gravel ? 85T ? ACP/PCC ? 8. oadwaywidth feet 9. T-aln: Level? Rolling? Mountainous[] 10, No. of thru lanes u, 11 ADT 12. Ave. Right of Way width ft. 13.. Blke lane? Yes ? N.0 , REPLACEMENT COST ESTIMATE Task Activity _ Amount Unit Unit Cost Extension Total in Dollars RIGHT OF WAY 14-Land Acquisition & Relocation Assistance Acre 15. Utility Relocation (Describe under NOTES below) L.S. µ, (g) 16. Clearing & Grubbing 7. 2, Acre ZGCO I LI , ( C)(D GRADING 17. Roadway Exc., Ind. Haul iC-) Cy 1 Z7 18. Borrow, Incl. Haul CY U C> 19. Other GRADING 5 7 BASE 20. Base type l l I (o I Ton Z ?-- 7 2 Z 7 f - BASE Zz z (D) 21. Crushed surfacing Ton 0 / 0 SURFACING 22. BST. Class A ) Mlle I L41 IZ 1 y I 23. ACP/PCC Ton - tJ SURFACING I 24. Channel & Ditch Exc. CY 25. a) Culvert & Drain Pipe, installed -+w7f-pr ca, i.. /OS Lf. (E) " r..r steal b) Culvert & Drain Pipe, Installed x --- - 31Cn Lf. u, / IO I ZO DRAINAGE L 7-r'. 17..' c) Culvert & Drain Pipe, Installed a -ori f v. f 7-0 Lf Z 26. Rlprap Zoy . Ton hOOU 27. Structures less than 20' long 0 LL O C) DRAINAGE 28. Other 0 O C-) 7 s 29. Signs i Ea. CIUOe ?C-) 0 (F) 30. Striping & Channel@atlon I Mile ZZE z ZS TRAFFIC 31, Signals (Exist. Intersec. w/signals ) !.? Inter- 0 p SERVICES 32. Guardrail, Type section Lf 33, Illumination (%exist. illuminated ) ?l Mile U TRAFFIC SE V 34. Other R ICES 35. Sidewalks, ft, wide h SY C' C, (G) 36. Blke paths/tells Mile U !? ROADSIDE 37. Fencing,Type_ T/-e1 >/1-17 - S79-c' LL )2-T 9Z V0 DEVELOPMENT 38, Erosion Control L S Ci U 39, Landscaping n , , Acre ROADSIDE DEVELOPMENT . Other - . lI pI {F - t f - f[11 P - 111 _ , - - r IDENTIFICATION 2. Road Name 3. County ??CLI CQ.C ?O„, 4. Ruute Number 5.?MI to MP 6. Length E:-= MI. EXISTING GEOMETRICS p o 7. Pavement type = Unimproved ? Gravel ? BST.? ACPJPCC ? ". 8. Roadway width 1 ?-CDr (eet 9. T,-lo: Level ? Rolling ? Mountainous ? 10. No. of thru lanes 11. ADT 12. Ave: Right of Way"width ft. 13. Bike lane? Yes ? No ?. I? REPLACEMENT COST ESTIMATE Task Activity Amount Unit Unit Cost Extension Total In Dollars (A) RIGHT OF WAY 14.Land Acquisition & Relocation Assistance Acre 15. Utility Relocation (Describe under NOTES below) L.S. W [VITT (g) 16. Clearing & Grubbing Acte ZUDO 17,17 (_7 GRADING 17. Roadway Exc., incl. Haul l .000 CY It 17cx?) 18. Borrow, Incl. Haul CY (] ' 19. Omer (J _? !7 GRADING L)< 3•? z (C) BASE 20. Base type leLA 3 6-KNVO Ill lla l Ton 7- ZZ??ZZ BASE (D) 21. Crushed surfacing Z07?-1 Ton ??ou Ib,3?U SURFACING 22. BST, ClassA Mile 1,941 Z1 UQ L/) 23. ACPJPCC Ton SURFACING 24. Channel & Ditch Exc. CY ZU 0 v-12 •Ph?..cc., 25. a) Culvert & Drain Pipe, installed t9!A.0-c k- _710 Lf. oU ? 114-710 (E) 0-10,7r.1 Ibo1 b) Culvert & Drain Pipe, installed x--tiv 3)p Ci Lt. 0O (7 - 7, 0 DRAINAGE L'V"Trd 3rne.i c) Culvert & Drain Pipe, installed x •C- Iv ) Z U Lt (o? Z` ,• 26. Riprap Ie]y Ton 15? 12_1 0 27. Structures less than 20'long 0 Lt C> 0 DRAINAGE 28. Other U . rl 0 z !? 29. Signs Ea. ' L10 v- Z2iy (F) 30. Striping & Cliannelly.ation mile 0 TRAFFIC 31. Signals (Exist, Intersec. w/signals) d Inter SERVICES 32. Guardrail, Type section Lf, r") 33. Illumination (%exist. Illuminated ) Mile C> TRAFFIC SERVICES 34. Other C7 _ !? S 35. Sidewalks, ft. wide SY (G) 36. Bike paths/trails ('l Mlle ROADSIDE 37. Fencing, Type ...? (-r///"•2 ?Z.p? Lf. DEVELOPMENT 38. Erosion Control U L S L 39. Landscaping ? . . Acre _,? ROADSIDE DEVELOPMENT 40. Other / y SUBTOTAL C IO (H) + Design Engineering at 10% (? la OU U +Construction Engineering at IS% GRANDTOTAL ) IDENTIFICATION 2. Road Name - ' ?'J1`v1ti'N.13 Yc=A 3. County ?? U.- ?c?¢ ? •-, Jr._ 4. Route Number 5. MP to MP 6. Length MI. i EXISTING GEOMETRICS 7. Pavement type = Unimproved ? Gravel ?. BST ? ACP/PCC ? 8. Roadway width feet ?.77 % 9. Terrain; Level El Rolling El lsloontalrous? 10.. No, of thru lanes i 11 ADT 12. Ave. Right of Way width ft. 13. Bike lane? Yes ? No D REPLACEMENT COST ESTIMATE Task Activity Amount Unit Unit Cast Extension Total in Dollars (A) RIGHT OF WAY 14.1-and Acquisition & Relocation Assistance Acre ' 15. Utility Relocation (Describe under NOTES below) L.S. fl OW (B) 16. Clearing & Grubbing .?q 5,5R Acre ZQC? 11}1 (e0 GRADING 17. Roadway Exc., Inc], Haul J0,000 Cy . -7, -SO 0 18. Borrow, Inc]. Haul U CY 19. Other GRADING Z (O (C) BASE 20. Base type 12!`C,1 Ton Oo B - ASE z (D) 21. Crushed surfacing ?4 Ton lo, .7)U SURFACING 22. BST, ClassA Mile C ZI 1?/ 23. ACP/PCC Ton _{Z ) C7 SURFACING 3 2 24. Channel & Ditch Exc. g(p Cy r' o 25. a) Culvert & Drain Pipe, Installed fs.n??a.r Lf. U ? n (E) +•?8"T1s4L.-r b) Culvert & Drain Pipe, Insulted 'I" .u w Z? U Lf. ) ?7 &? L1Q90 DRAINAGE %u. - _.u. C) Culvert & Drain Pipe, Installed' a / 7 6 U 26. Rlprap /(C7 Ton 15= ??nn 27. Structures less than 20' long Lf l:J [? DRAINAGE 28. Other <? . U n ?{ 29. Signs Ea. 41 CO (F) 30. Striping& Channelizatlon Mlle L ZZB? ?7 TRAFFIC 31. Signals (Exist. Intersec, w/signals ) Inter section U r) SERVICES 32. Guardrail, Type ( Lf. C/ 33. Illumination (% exist. illuminated ) Mlle TRAFFIC SERVICES 34. Other 35. Sidewalks, ft. wide rJ SY U (oJ (G) 36. Bike paths/trails Mlle U C%1 ROADSIDE 37. Fencing,TYpe Z > LL DEVELOPMENT 38. Erosion Control L S y 39. Landscaping . . Acre ?-? ROADSIDE DEVELOPMENT 40, Other ?(, , IDENTIFICATION 2, Road Name J 3. County ?dT?¢c°, ,._ 4. Route Number :.5. MP to MP 6. Length :1 MI. i EXISTING GEOMETRICS - - 7. Pavement type =Unimproved ? Gravel (-] BST ? ACP/PCC ? •8. Roadway width I I-ZO feet NZ 9. Terraln: Level? Rolling? IAounealnous? 10. No. of thou lanes - 1.1, ADT 12. Ave, Right of Way width ft. 13. Bike lane? Yes ? to U - REPLACEMENT COST ESTIMATE Task Activity Amount Unit Unit Cost Extension Total In Dollars (A) RIGHT OF WAY 14•Land Acquisition & Relocation Assistance Acre 15. Utility Relocation (Describe under NOTES below) L.S. RO (B) 16. Clearing & Grubbing ?•?S Acre 77r ??????>> GRADING 17. Roadway Exc., Ind. Haul CY ? o U 18. Borrow, incl. Haul CY ( i 19. Other U h [/ n GRADING ?(i z v 0 (Gl BASE 20. Base type l2uC_I ) 6yr- yd.l 20 57 T Z z 50 + on , BASE Z I- (D) 21. Crushed surfacing Z Tan ?- b C/?,C? SURFACING 22- BST,ClassA 1x 773 Jr ? Mile zo,(b sV _ ZU (OSV ACP/PCC _ Ton ? , U SURFACING 3 U t-/ 3 Channel & Ditch Exc. _ e C CY -"PMf..cnss ) Culvert & Drain Pipe, Inslailedga a2-.?.•. r .I,ic• Lf. I ?U ZZU r T ) Culvert & Drain P lpe, Instilled Lf -. DRAINAGE ) Culvert & Drain Plpe, Installed too u &CD R lprap p /ors . Ton ?5°-° IS(Jfj 27. Structures less than 20' long Lf O DRAINAGE 28. Other . 29. Signs ?? Ea. 7? 'q oo (F) 30. Striping & Channellzation Mile z 78 7 LR TRAFFIC 31, Signals (Exist. Intersec, w/signals ) ?? In tor- _ _ Q SERVICES 32. Guardrail, Type (') section Lf /l ?"'"? . 33, Illumination (%exlst. Illuminated ) L='' Mile TRAFFIC 34, Other _-LL. --SL_ SERVICES Z 6 35, Sidewalks, ft" wide SY C (G) 36. Blke paths/trails Mlle O ROADSIDE ?t- 37. Fencing, Type 1LCCJIrQ Z'SiU LL ?? 9Zy0 DEVELOPMENT 38. Erasion Control L.S. 39. Landscaping Acre L ROADSIDE DEVELOPMENT 40. Other ECE __L EXISTING GEOMETRICS _ 7. Pavement type = Unimproved O Grzvel ? BST ? ACP/PCC ? 8. Roadway width Z 1.1' feet 9. Terrain: Level ? Roliing ? Mountainous ? 10. No. of thru lanes 1 1. ADT- - 12. Ave. Right of Way width ft.'. 13. Bike lane? Yes ? No ? REPLACEMENT COST ESTIMATE Task Activity Amount Unit Unit Cost Extension Total in Dollars (A) RI H Y W 14. Land Acyulsition & Relocation Assistance Acre G T OF A I5. Utility Relocation (Describe under NOTES below) L.S. (g) 16. Clearing & Grubbing 3J t"4 Acre 2,!)00 p -7 Z g? GRADING 17. Roadway Exc., Incl. Haul I I,.cyN0 CY I25' 17 SUU 18. Borrow, Ind. Haul C7 CY a _ a 19. Other f D GRADING (C) BASE 20. Base type aL?.3 C?KLVd Id Ton B ASE Z11 (D) 21. Crushed surfacing I '? 7 Ton 00 S- 7PS SURFACING ClassA 1?-r'13y 22. BST Mile _ ZC?, 1" ? O (eSt? , 23. ACP/PCC C) Ton _. r SURFACING 24. Channel & Ditch Exc. 'k) CY 25. a) Culvert & Drain Pipe, Installed ia• n c 31 L f. 7 °Q Z (7 a; (E) z-IS" e7 b) Culvert & Drain Pipe, Instilled -A--iv w Z(] Lf. eta 1,14) DRAINAGE r zv c) Culvert & Drain Pipe, Installed %-u,vly ?U Lf ? 26. Riprap 100 . Ton L 506) 27. Structures less than 20' long Lf a 0 DRAINAGE 28. Other . c`) 29. Signs ?U Ea, y0- goo (F) 30• Striping & Channellzatlon Mile ZZ ? ZZZ TRAFFIC 31. Signals (Exist. Intersec, w/signals ) inter section _ O SERVICES 32. Guardrail, Type U Lf. D `.) 33. Illumination (% exist. Illuminated ) a Mile _ 0 TRAFFIC SERVICES 34. Other C? U 3S. Sidewalks, ft. wide SY 0 C.? (G) 36, Bike paths/trails Mlle 0 ROADSIDE 37. Fencing, Type n It 7/PQ- •iL rO Lf "_2/ DEVELOPMENT 38, Erosion Control LZ , L S U ?7 39, Landscaping - . . Acre ROADSIDE DEVELOPMENT 40. Other ?_) IDENTIFICATION -:' 2. Road Name 3. County Jr-?6-f"?0 4. Route Number 5. MP to MP 6. Length ? MI. EXISTING GEOMETRICS 1 - Pavement type = Unimproved ? Gravel ? BST ? ACP/PCC ? S. Roadway width ZL'-f- feet 1 9, Terrain: Level Rolling hl-salnous 10. No, of thru lanes 11. APT 12. Ave. Right of Way width ft. 13. Bike lane? Yes ? No ? REPLACEMENT COST ESTIMATE Task Activity Amount Unit Unit Cost Extension Total In Dollars (A) 14•Land Acquisition & Relocation Assistance Acre RIGHT OF WAY 15. Utility Relocation (Describe under NOTES below) L.S. AV4 Clearing & Grubbing 16 Acre 2000 (B) D NG . Roadway Exc Incl. Haul 17 1 .000 CY 125 31 3',OCD GRA I „ . Incl. Haul Borrow 18 U CY L? GRADING , . 19. Other CJ d ? ? (C) Base type l?/ <-J FS 6-11V2? 20 ? Ton ? p 7" 7!5A11 11 BASE BASE . z58N (D) 21. Crushed surfacing ?• ,,r2_ Ton SURFACING BST Class A Z', 22 '4(<77` ( Mlle Z. ZS,S )3 SURFACING , , , 23. ACP/PCC Ton Channel & Ditch Exc. 24 pG CY _.G..- . 15-ISi.CO,rc• Installed e = a) Culvert & Drain Pipe 25 _ , Z Lt. t7tl 7 0 { , . h) Culvert & Drain Pipe, Installed 4 - 4' v ) 4 y Lt. 1i2- DRAINAGE r'IS}6Rt c) Culvert $ Drain Pipe, Installed vc s-01 `) (, Ll ov T 1 -' ? Q 26 Rlpro ? . Ton 00 L 7 S? . 27. Structures less than 20' long D Lf O DRAINAGE 28. Other • 29. Signs L Ea. LI ?0 (F 30 Striping & Channellzatlon mile =o Z7-13 ) . intersec, w/signals ) Signals (Exist 31 C) ectio TRAFFIC SERVICES . . Guardnll Ty pe 32 n s Lf. , . 33 Illuminated Illumination (% exist _) Mile l] TRAFFIC SERVICES . . 34. Other Sidewalks ft, wide 35 SY U (G) , . 36. Bike paths/trails Mlle ROADSIDE Fencing Iype 37 Lf 2ysj DEVELOPMENT , . 38 Erosion Control r> . L.S. L> ?l DSIDE . Landscaping 39 Acre ROA DEVELOPMENT , 40. Other ?? L REPLACEMENT COST ESTIMATE Task Activity Amount Unit Unit Cost Extension DTotollars lars (A) 14•Land Acquisition & Relocation Assistance Acre W RIGHT OF WAY I5. Utility Relocation (Describe under NOTES below) L.S. (g 16. Clearing & Grubbing Acre ?1CO _ 2 IZ 1 ZU ) GRADING Incl. Haul 17. Roadway Exc. LD?IYY> CY 34000 , Haul Borrow incl 18 CY GRADING , . . 19. Other 0 -0- O y 7 (C) 20. Base type 12 °G1 • e;fP"sJcl ( IZ Ton 25 L/ BASE BASE 1 (D) 21. Crushed surfacing Z_ Ton rJP "-" 116 SURFACING 22 BST ClassA Mile SURFACING , , 23. ACP/PCC Ton u'? t•l(o,9elD S 24. Channel & Ditch Exc. r , ? Cy g(p o•i,'?Pl a,ts cn?, a.r a+JV. Installed a Culvert & Drain Pipe 25 71 U Lf. GG I L/ I L (E) , . VtE" T l s SNa b) Culvert & Drain Pipe, Installed A.-cu \v. ??/'? ? Lf. ?--tt p-C lt_ _ ? 7 (o y DRAINAGE z-24"Tn 1 ?toai c) Culvert & Drain Pipe, Installed x-crsiV. ? () Lt. 26 Rlprap , / S U Ton 150"- ?.? tiU . 27. Structures less than 20' long tom Lt, d DRAINAGE 28. Other / ? (e 29. Signs ?U Ea. L?Q' yUU (F) 30. Striping& Channellzation Mile ZZ r'te` F_Z.?t' TRAFFIC Intersec. w/slgnals ) Signals (Exist 31 Intor• Q SERVICES . . Type 32 Guardrail section Lt. . , 33 Illuminated ) Illumination (% exist Mile TRAFFIC SERVICES . . 34. Other Z ft. wide 35. Sidewalks SY O O (G) , 36. Bike paths/tralls t'7 Mile b ROADSIDE 37. Fencing, Type Ld/YO- (r?.QD Lt 11 S DEVELOPMENT 38 Erosion Control 4 L S SIDE . 39 Landscaping f? . . Acre ROAD DEVELOPMENT . 40. Other n J 1 5 ?' 1 1 r REPLACEMENT COST ESTIMATE Task Activity Amount Unit Unit Cost Extension Total In Dollars (A) RIGHT OF WAY 14. Land Acquisition & Relocation Assistance Acre 15. Utility Relocation (Describe under NOTES below) L.S. ' (g) 16. Clearing & Grubbing 2 :4rj Acre WOO a , v GRADING 17, Roadway Exc., Incl. Haul 1 DlCy--) p CY (,= (7 , S(?o 18. Borrow, Incl. Haul CY _ 19. Other (? f7 Q GRADING ? O (C) BASE 20, Base type 12 ELI, Fa? r- m,,', ( ,615 7 Ton BASE ZS° (D) 21. Crushed surfacing 7- ?'S Ton SURFACING 22. BST, ClassA 0 Mile 23. ACP/PCC U.20 L}a S5 7 Ton 7- y SURFACING 24. Channel & Ditch Exc. CY oU 'q- (DO ?o•r2 "Pint .k ,c 25. a) Culvert & Drain Pipe, Installed: t A6or cnl? G) Lf. 7 oG 1 4 70 (E) b) Culvert & Drain Pipe, Installed % -GU(v - 2 } [? LL ) 7 0O 35 70 DRAINAGE !-2w -71. 7'r. 1-1k c) Culvert & Drain Pipe, Installed t( -cu w. 7 O LL I y 70 26. Riprap Ton 27. Structures less than 20' long Lf DRAINAGE 28. Other ?_ . (> 29. Signs 0 Ea. Yon 2100 IF) 30. Striping & Channelizatlon Mile TRAFFIC 31. Signals (Exist. Intersec. w/signals _) Inler• Q n SERVICES 32. Guardnll,Type U section Lf n 33. Illumination I% exist. Illuminated ) ?-' Mlle U ? TRAFFIC SERVICES 34. Other 35. Sidewalks, ft, wide r] 5Y CJ (G) 36. Bike paths/trails ,ry y Mlle ? ? a - ROADSIDE 37. Fencing, Type Lf• TZ- ? '? q ' • DEVELOPMENT 38. Erosion Control L.S. 0 C 39. Landscaping ( Acre c--> 0 ROADSIDE DEVELOPMENT 0. Other _ `?} ) rf r , t ! I 1 i IDENTIFICATION P.oad Name 3. County ?Q.?; O?'\ 4. Route Number T57M to MP 6, Length Nil. 11 EXISTING GEOMETRICS 7. Pavement type = Unim roved ? G I ? ? P rave BST ACP/PCC? 8. Roadway width -0-I' feet 9. Te-1n: Level? Ralling? Mountainous? 10. No. ofthru lanes 11, ADT 12, Ave, Right of Way width ft. 13.x: Bike Jane?. Yes ? No ? REPLACEMENT COST ESTIMATE Task Activity Amount Unit Unit Cost Extension Total In Dollars (A) RIGHT OF WAY 14.Land Acquisition& Relocation Assistance Acre 15. Utility Relocation (Describe under NOTES below) L.S. (B) 16. Clearing & Grubbing S Acre ZOOU In d GRADING 17. Roadway Exc., Incl. Haul /S,C:OO CY ??? z(n z.~ 18. Borrow, Ind. Haul CY 19. Other D O O GRADING 3 lC) BASE 20. Base type lLG?, Ton _ BASE Z 3 (D) 21. Crushed surfacing Z-7,1 ? Ton SURFACING 22• BST, Class A ? Mlle ??}} 23. ACP/PCC rC • F 45.p c' ?? Z X47 Ton ?ZO N&OI q / y0 SURFACING x 24. Channel & Ditch Exc. .? CY CF ?? ') Zi) 25. a) Culvert $ Drain Pipe, installedP?'• 1v. ?D Lf, 7 (E) Tr' 1 b) Culvert & Drain Pipe, Installede-l6 r " 1 14c) Lf. 17 giO Z ? DRAINAGE ' s-24"T•IS a c) Culvert & Drain Pipe, Installed V -ct r I v? n Lf. pe Z) _ '` )7Q 26. Riprap Ton ?Scc? 750 27. Structures less than 20' long (7 Lf D O DRAINAGE 28. Other • ? (9d 29. Signs Ea• •?2 yid (F) 30. Striping& Channeliaatlon Mile 7-7 ?Jtt ZZ TRAFFIC 31. Signals (Exist. Intersec. w/signals ) d Inter Q SERVICES 32. Guardrail, Type section LL 33. Illumination (% exist, Illuminated ) Mile U 0 TRAFFIC SE _ 34. Other L? RVICES 35. Sidewalks, ft, wide d SY l c; (G) 36. Bike paths/trails Mile (•j ROADSIDE " ' 37. Fencing,TYpe Tr _ .ll- lr??r'd- ??ZU LL 7%ll O DEVELOPMENT 38. Erosion Control d L S (') 39. Landscaping . . Acre ?? r) ROADSIDE DEVELOPMENT 40. Other ?_ C 3 J E? k E r ? I} 1 / O IDENTIFICATION'S 2, Road Na- n. 3. County 4. Route Number - 5. MP to MP 6, Length E== Mi. EXISTING GEOMETRICS 7. Pavement type = Unimproved ? Gravel ? BST ? ACP/PCC O 8. Roadway width I (7, feet ).-f 9. Terraln: Level: Rolling? Mountalnous? 10, No. of thru lanes I 1 I, APT 12, Ave. Right of Way. width ft. - 13.' Bike lane? Ycs ? N.0 REPLACEMENT COST ESTIMATE Task Activity Amount Unit Unit Cost Extension Total in Dollars (A) Land Acquisition & Relocation Assistance 14 Acre RIGHT OF WAY , 15. Utility Relocation (Describe under NOTES below) L.S. RO 16 Clearing & Grubbing (?,Olo Acre Z0-20 )Z, /z0 (B) D N . incl. Haul 17 . Roadway Exc 't'•?1?> CY GRA I G , ., Haul Borrow Incl 18 C7 CY U GRADING , . . 19. Other G? r, 9 s (C) Base type IZ C ? rr L) 20 8JIS Ton ?. ? / 7 /UZ BASE BASE . (D) 21. Crushed surfacing 15 S I Ton _X760 SURFACING 22 ClassA BST Mlle SURFACING , , 23. ACP/PCC Ton 7 2. E. Channel & Ditch Exc. 24 CY vo Z H O . -lz"Pia, Installed .,.p-?-. t,•I•,, a)Culvert& Drain Pipe 25 LL 4-) ) I , . b) Culvert & Drain Pipe, Installed t • c..1,4 :5 Le 0 hL 1 7 °-° (o l ZU DRAINAGE c)Culvert & Drain Pipe, InstalledL x-u I LO Lf Z1 75Z/? 26 rap Ri 7100 , Ton IS`-'y -',(>(X? . p 27. Structures less than 20' long - Lf. C) <`7> DRAINAGE 28. Other C, % CD Z 2 I Signs 29 .'? Ea. c-/O ) ao . Striping & Channelitatlon 30 Mile C,7, (F) . Intersec. w/signals ) Signals (Exist 31 t^7 eiilo TRAFFIC SERVICES --, . . Guardrail Type 32 it s n LL L" , . 33 Illumination (% exist Illuminated Mlle t'?) 0 TRAFFIC SERVICES . . 34. Other ?? ( Z U wide ft Sidewalks 35 C. SY U C..) (G) , . . Bike paths/trails 36 mile U ?j ROADSIDE . Type .II. Fencing 37 Lf, DEVELOPMENT , . 38 Erosion Control L S , Landscaping 39 . . Acre -? C) ROADSIDE DEVELOPMENT . 40. Other REPLACEMENT COST ESTIMATE Task Activity Amount Unit Unit Cost Extension Total in Dollars (A) 14 Land Ac uisition & Relocation Assistance Acre R'psy RIGHT OF WAY , q 15. Utility Relocation (Describe under NOTES below) L.S. 19) 16. Clearing&Grubbing 5 Acre 7=000 1(?( (n0 ( 17 Haul Roadway Exc Incl CY 11' ?1 •y?? GRADING , ., . Haul w 18 B Incl CD CY y n GRADING , . orro . 19. Other Z / 1' C) (C) 7" CI, Ci l rave pe Base t 20 S55 1 Ton BASE BASE y . (D) 21. Crushed surfacing - Ton 00 ?Z(oU SURFACING 22 ClassA BST cL Mile t7 SURFACING , , 23. ACP/PCC Ton Channel & Ditch Exc. 24 e CY y J' z y . 4 •li'PIe ? n Cc,r • 25. a) Culvert & Drain Pipe, Installed ee neo.. n.lv. Lf. 00 ?'- (E) h-?8"TiJ S1.a I b)Culvert& Drain Pipe, installed x -ulv 3(6)0 LL Il oo (nl7 C) DRAINAGE t-ilk)_ c) Culvert & Drain Pipe, Installed a - I Z U L f. ?.,f 26. Riprap S (7 Ton ) `? ?' 77.5 (J 27 Structures less than 20' long Lf U DRAINAGE . 28. Other . 29. Signs ? Ea. 4- () •`"v ?OU 30 Stri & Channelizatlon in Mlle CJ (F) . p g w/signals ) lntersec 31 nals (Exist Si G ter w C.? n TRAFFIC SERVICES . . . g Type 32 Guardrail f 1 s tlon Lf. TRAFFIC . , 33 Ill i d ) Ill i i (% i t Mile SERVICES . nat ex um e um on st. na 34. Other__ (p 0 wide ft 35 Sidewalks (7 SY O C7 (G) . , . Bike paths/trails 36 L \_ Mlle ROADSIDE . TYPe J1- LJ IC a_. 37. Fencing n 3) Lf. 3?- L q DEVELOPMENT , 38 Erosion Control C1 L S a C! OADSIDE . 39. Landscaping . . Acre ('. t) R DEVELOPMENT 40. Other 1 (,. 1 IDENTIFICATION .- Road Name _ 3. County 4, Route Number S. MP to MP. 6. Length MI. ) EXISTING GEOMETRICS '1. Pavement type = Unimproved C Gravel ? BST ? ACP/PCC ? 8. Roadway width 17+ feet - i 9. Terrain: Leyel? Rolling 13 Mountainous El 10, No.ofthru lanes 11, APT 12. Ave. Right of Way width ft. 13. Bike lane? Yes ? No ? ` k I REPLACEMENT COST ESTIMATE Task Activity Amount Unit Unit Cost Extension Total in Dollars (A) RIGHT OF WAY I4.Land Acquisition & Relocation Assistance Acre 15, Utility Relocation (Describe under NOTES below) L.S. RP 1 (B) 16. Clearing & Grubbing Acre ZOCJO ?77l7 GRADING 17• Roadway Exc., incl. Haul -< CY 7? ) ?7 5- 18. Borrow, Incl. Haul CY O U GRADING 19. Other (C) BASE 20, Basetype_G\- Vi r7yr-.g_\ t7-" -_i ) Ton z«O ) /UZ BASE / U (D) 21. Crushed surfacing ) 55Z Ton boo = L ? L SURFACING 22, BST, ClassA U Mile e -- v- - - - SURFACING 23. ACP/PCC O Ton _ 0 n 24. Channel & Ditch Exc. y^ (? CY -1 =v Z 1+ b 25. a) Culvert & Drain Pipe, installed fad'-sll -1- ) L f 7 oy yr'" Ste' Z b) Culvert & Drain Pipe, installed r d•, v _ ( 6 Q Lt. 1 7 - ?)o DRAINAGE a `.n I seal '-z c) Culver[ & Drain Pipe, installed lu• Q Lf, o= 26. Riprap Inn Ton IS o? 1500 27. Structures less than 20' long D Lf 0 DRAINAGE 28, Other _(-p . O (? G? y 29, Signs 5 Ea. C_.D(_-?' (F) 30, Striping & Channelizatlon C7 Mile (7,) 0 TRAFFIC 31. Signals (Exist. Intersec. w/signals ) _ C!) Inter 0 0 SERVICES 32. Guardrail,Type n See Its Lf, U 33, Illumination (% exist, Illuminated ) (J Mlle (-J U TRAFFIC SERVICES 34. Other 3S. Sidewalks, ft. wide C.'_.' SY (G) 36, Bike paths/Iralis (ID Mile ! (?) ROADSIDE 37, Fencing, Type JT C0brd. _ u. _ 75 DEVELOPMENT 38. Erosion Control L S 39, Landscaping . . Acre C? ROADSIDE DEVELOPMENT 40, Other ("'? _ O I 1 REPLACEMENT COST ESTIMATE Task Activity Amount Unit Unit Cost Extension Total In Dollars (A) 14.1.and Acquisition & Relocation Assistance Acre RIGHT OF WAY 15. Utility Relocation (Describe under NOTES below) L.S. (B) 16. Clearing & Grubbing U• ?(O Acre ?60 GRADING Ind. Haul 17. Roadway Exc. CY , Incl. Haul Borrow 18 CY GRADING , . 19. Other C7 ( _? i (C) BASE 20. Base type 17-" C-1. P, 6-,", 1 G``h l Ton Zov I -I //,7 - BASE (D) 21. Crushed surfacing Ton 7 760 SURFACING BST 22 ClassA 0 Mlle O C7 SURFACING . , 23. ACP/PCC 01? Ton 24. Channel & Ditch Exc. y CY C= Z N C7 25. a)Culvert &Drain Pipe, lnstalledr•+tt+••..?• (C? Lf. 70 (E) =-.WTr.I d\o..l b) Culvert & Drain Pipe, Installed - .. \v I F',U Lf. 11 c?_- 201 e o DRAINAGE c)Culvert &Drain Pipe, Installed LL 7111-, 26. Rlpnp 5C) Ton )5_ 7sU 27. Structures less than 20' long O Lf O (•? DRAINAGE 28. Other C7 . C J C7 kplEd 29. Signs 7 Ea. /?a_o Zl7L? (F) 30. Striping& Channellzatlon 1 Mile /)vow { ?? TRAFFIC 31. Signals (Exist. Intersect. w/signals ) inter' i SERVICES 32. Guardrail Type C? s c on Lf. G , 33. Illumination(%exist illuminated ) Mlle CJ - ?-? TRAFFIC SERVICES . 34. Other /-' U % I E , ;5. 1.01 35. Sidewalks, (t. wide SY (G) 36. Bike paths/trails ?-! Mlle C = C'% ROADSIDE 37. Fencing, Type 7.Uy0 Lf. _ )'75 y Zf5 DEVELOPMENT 38. Erosion Control 6d L.S. ?'. 39. Landscaping r Acre ?> !?> ROADSIDE DEVELOPMENT 40. Other { REPLACEMENT COST ESTIMATE Task Activity Amount Unit Unit Cost Extension Total in Dollars (A) 14 Land Acquisition & Relocation Assistance Acre RIGHT OF WAY . 15. Utility Relocation (Describe under. NOTES below) L.S. 16. Clearing & Grubbing Acre /U,/ aO D 4G G Incl. Haul 17 Roadway Exc LGL'?• G Cy ! 75 1 SpU RA 11 . ., Haul Incl Borrow 18 . CY GRADING , . . 19. Other U -a L C7 (C) 20. Bas<tYPe ?7C-/•/J L TC\Yd_I P? °5?1 Ton BASE BASE oz (D) 21. Crushed surfacing '55 ?_ Ton 5- _7610 SURFACING 22 ClassA BST Mile SURFACING . , 23. ACP/PCC _Q?' C'•F l'}S?}\0.?? /, S Ton ? 00 ?j (per Channel & Ditch Exc. 24 690 CY - 214 O . t J G.J? Installed ' a Culvert & Drain Pipe 25 Z_ I Lf. . 5 -o , . b) Culver t& Drain Pipe, Installed x - e.,w. 3(n0 Lf. / 7 h / U DRAINAGE r-29`yr_dy c) Culvert & Drain Pipe, Installed x- /-- v? ? Lf. 7-1 26 Ripnp //71-11 To. ! oU . 27. Structures less than 20' long C7 Lf. 0 DRAINAGE 28. Other ?? C:- I 29. Signs Ea. P_Do Striping& Channellzation 30 mile (F) . w/signals ) intersec Signals (Exist 31 inter TRAFFIC SERVICES . . . Type Guardrall 32 C.> section Lt. C _ , . 33 Illuminated ) illumination (% exist Mile C) C3 TRAFFIC SERVICES . , 34. Other U 0 G Sidewalks It. wide 3S U SY G? (G) , . 36. Bike paths/tralls Mlle ROADSIDE 37. Fencing, Type 17 y?5z 13y LL t 7? 2' v DEVELOPMENT 38 Erosion Control O L S U a S E . Landscaping 39 U . . Acre ROAD ID DEVELOPMENT . 40. Other U 4?. SUBTOTAL ll+l ' * Design Engineering at 10% T' s Construction Engineering at 15% ms s'-a i GRAND TOTAL ' 2 -r-2 NOTES DT ronsa 14e-012 D npe g? ....-.s?,.... ..?..,.....-.-?r.??,.,,,.,..,,.?.ra...w.„•e+?wew?maTrw?-.•..?.,,.,?a.ea..-.....-..-. tom:. - ?, REPLACEMENT CONSTRUCTION COSTS L CATEGORY Iz-ti`LX .9C?o? i -" IDENTIFICATION 2. Road Name 3, County I '741_41C`0-r'Su-? 4. Route Number 1` o 5. MP to MP - 6. Length [== Ml. •? EXISTING GEOMETRICS 7. Pavement type = Unimproved ? Gravel O BST C1 ACP/PCC [1 8. Roadway width feet 9. Terrain: Level ? Rolling ? hlountalnous ? 10. No. of thru lanes - ]I. ADT '.12, Ave. Right of Way width ft. 13. 81ke lane? Yes ? No Q REPLACEMENT COST ESTIMATE Task Activity Amount Unit Unit Cost Extension Total in Dollars (A) RIGHT OF WAY 14•1.1nd Acquisition & Relocation Assistance Acre 1S. Utility Relocation (Describe under NOTES below) L.S. (B) 16. Clearing&Grubbing GO Acre ZCC10 G ?O GRADING 17. Roadway Exc., Incl. Haul _ O[.l CY 1 7? ? J fy 7 c? 18. Borrow, Incl. Haul Q CY d 19. Other U Q GRADING 7,5 (C) BASE 20. Base type ItLl, GPdva( _ C) Ton zoo 1 9,41 l BASE (D) 21, Crushed surfacing 1 /3lo Ton aJ??? ? SURFACING 22. BST, Classq Mile 23. ACP/PCC ?7„O C,?.F/lsphnl? '710 Ton Z(J- ?5`?L7U --?- SURFACING L / 3 O 24. Channel & Ditch Exc. ? GY y C lle?7 IV •r2."I?pll\LqK 25. a) Culvert & Drain Pipe, Installed Wd)•-C,, hl. ZIO Lf. 7a-? SG7CJ (E) b) Culvert &Drain Pipe, Installed n -cult' . GI _ZU Lf. JIpU L10F0 DRAINAGE 1-LN`7%• IS1ca! C) Culvert &Drain Pipe, Imlalled t •uJv (lp Lf. L1?° 26. Riprap f C) Ton °- J ? - / i(7 (? 27. Structures less than 20' long Lf !p O DRAINAGE 28. Other . r d y 7 29. Signs Ea, bo (F) 30. Striping & Channelization Mile TRAFFIC 31, Signals (Exist. Intersec. w/signals ) Q SERVICES 32. Guardrail,Type U ec to sectio n Lf. (0 C9 33. Illumination (% exist. Illuminated ) 0 Mile 0 U TRAFFIC SERVICES 34. Other U D U a 35. Sidewalks, ft. wide SY U t? (G) 36. 81ke paths/tolls Mile f-.) CJ ROADSIDE 37. Fencing, Type T CL7rre J3?-0 LL J 7-i 10 DEVELOPMENT 38, Erosion Control Q L S ? (J 39, Landscaping . . Acre _ _ !? ROADSIDE DEVELOPMENT 40. Other I7 _ ?? 3 I O ! M REPLACEMENT COST ESTIMATE Task Activity Amount Unit Unit Cost Extension Total In Dollars (A) RIGHT OF WAY 14•Land Acquisition & Relocation Assistance Acre 15. Utility Relocation (Describe under NOTES below) L.S. (B) 16. Clearing & Grubbing L68.5 Acre ZCOU 9700 GRADING 17. Roadway Exc., incl. Haul 1(11CCD CY 18. Borrow, incl. Haul CY 19. Other (7 y GRADING (C ) BASE 20. B.S. type /2'GI, jS l ravo To 2S- I n BASE j (D) 21. Crushed surfacing wc'? Ton SUR FACING 22. BST, Classq Mile O 23 ACP/PCC 1 'I SURFACING . Ton ZO- J?1 ?Q(7 24, Channel & Ditch Exc. ?•la• Pl??.?cn.c25. a)Culvert &Drain Pipe, Installed z+x+as.-.Ir 21U Lf 7 P--G /'l7D (E) d-le"Tnlt b) Culvert & Drain Pipe, installed x-,o, y. (S(? . Lf, I ?oJ i0 (ed DRAINAGE c) Culvert & Drain Pipe, Installed 2q xTMCSI v I LIE ? u _ 26. Riprap /UD Ton /S? 1UDO 27. Structures less than 20' long O Lf O - 1 DR N 28. Other . AGE AI 29. Signs Ea. `2/O (F) 30, Striping & Channeli:ation Mlle TRAFFIC 31. Signals(Exist. Inlersec. w/signals Inter Q 7 SERVICES 32. Guardrail, Type SIC I Ion LL 61 33. Illumination (%exis6111uminated ) (> Mile U TRAFFIC 34. Other r > In SERVICES -1L_ (a Z 35. Sidewalks, ft. wide ( SY 7 (G) 36. Bike Paths/trails ) MIII ROADSIDE 37. Fencing, Type Lr. - DEVELOPMENT 38. Erosion Cont,ol f7 L S rL - 39, Landscaping CJ . . Acre ROADSIDE DEVELOPME 40. Other n _C? ?..? NT Z y REPLACEMENT CONSTRUCT ION COSTS i. CATEGORY ? " I OO - fz? (?(?• IDENTIFICATION - 2, Road Name / yCy-\ TV\ 4, Route Number 3, County C t 4 c•ti0 t? 5. MP to A1P 6. Length Mi. EXISTING GEOMETRIC, 7. Pavement type =Unimproved 13 Grave l ? BST ? ACP/PCC C1 8. Roadway width I }- feet O 7l0 _ 9. Terrain: Level ? Rolling ? Mour•.ta inous ? 10. No. of thru lanes 11. ADT 12. Ave. Right of Way width ft• 13. Bike lanes Y110 N.0 REPLACEMENT COST ESTIMATE Task Activity Amount Unit Unit Cos[ l in ars (A) RIGHT OF WAY 14, Land Acquisition & Relocation Assistance Acre W 15. Utility Relocation (Describe under NOTES below ) L.S. 4 (B) 16. Clearing & Grubbing Acre 7000 GRADING 17. Roadway Exc., incl. Haul CM1, 18, Borrow, Incl. Haul CY 19. Other n I'D b DING (cJ 7 5 BASE. 20. Base type rCVO( Ton z&'- 17 1 - , , "o -r---- BASE 7 / (D) 21. Crushed surfacing Ton ;? o SURFACING 22. BST, Class A Mile _ ?OI 77q. 16 -229 23, ACP/PCC Q . 2 SURFACING'-' Ton Q Q Z y O 24. Channel & Ditch Exc. 5.2'1':e:,.cn. '?•• CY Z q C) 25. a) Culvert & Drain Pipe, Installedl%% nnn'.r,. ty? //?`l Lf. ? -l •z ? b) Culvert &DnIn Pipe, Installed • • r v I G,p Lf. _ 17 00 .z (71 G DRAINAGE /-ZV';?,)s1aa? C) Culvert & Drain Pipe, installed v -ca. ;v IOU Lf. Z I Iz-, ) / (ep 26. Riprap 5? 7on 00 15 -- _h ? '7 27. Structures less than 20' long Q Lf 0 0 28. Other Q . C) n DRAINAGE _ _ ?y5 29. Signs _ Ea, 4Oco 7 n (F) 30. Striping & Chmnellzation --?- Mile ((O ) I U TRAFFIC 31. Signals (Exist. Intersec. w/slgnals ) __ U Inler• O Q SERVICES 32. Guardrall,Type section Lf Q 33. Illumination (% exist. Illuminated ) r . Mile ? Q TRAFFIC 34, Other ^ SERVICES t f? Q 31 35. Sidewalks, ft, wide SY 0 Q (G) 36. Blke paths/tells G Mlle (1) ROADSIDE 37. Fencing, Type 1 . i Lt(1- LE Lf. DEVELOPMENT 38, Erosion Control L S 39. Landscaping D . . Acre n Q ROADSIDE 40, Other _ Q r? DEVELOPMENT ?.Z L?JO y U rU. U W u In U O O C U L4 M G n' 1 ? f 1 SS00 `IV.IAI 1? - M .1 tt, 7 9 r ?' K 3 x ONR[SSNION3 ?' ? oa r N 7 y O ; ? V U ? ?r ' ? N N ,? (V ? C 1'1 rJ n Kc 0 J Q Q O J ?C v D2NdOISi1uQ T a N O ? r t?? v SQISQVOL T O n1 .? Gam' ate- c N ? k SDIAIGS 'J V.) r 40 O OIddV213. r M ? ? pr n w SDVNrdua o T T c3 r s Q r E r O 9 a F o JNIOVJMS 0o -s N 45 ? O ? a 0 r N fn ^? c+i t f n M v asva O O K - ? m i= r r 6 N i _ . t,i ? r ? r D ? S O ? fmam ? N m N M ;7 z (? f 'Wi d0 1 NOIlV'dUGISN00 WO:i QS.LV NIP UrIS JI-Ord U U U U U U a U a W w a a a 9NIOVd2if1S F ? u7 F +a' F us uz F +?' F uT co C ¢ a cl. U C9 p, U' v . i a ai ¢ ai ¢ w ¢ ai ¢ ¢ 0 0 W F y Q y o o ti O 0 0 .? O 0 0 .-+ O 0 0 v rl 0 0 v -i 0 n n rt 0 n n ? + 0 o O 0 0 O 0 0 0 ri + O 0 .-? r 0 ? 0 c . i 0 v ri ,/, n 0 v, 0 ,n 0 ,n ' 9:4 x x x a a a NVMM/ IVanu a x a a •O O O O O •S d• O N N v c? 0 w 0 0 0 10 0 -In 0 0 v 0 0 0 RIOOSI V0 0 r+ 0 r+ C a / = 0 v o v n n IXI H n o ,n 0 IX, 0 v, 0 v, 0 ,n a rz ca cK z cG a a a a a ? 5 1. CATEGORY 2 100 13 (%C? ) REPLACEMENT CONSTRUCTION COSTS IDENTIFICATION I' 2. Road Name _ `emu vv?w? tv, -17 3. County T? ?•r-e_`C 4. Route Number S. MP to MP 6. Length ML I !. - .r EXISTING GEOMETRICS -? a 7. Pavement type = Unimproved ? Gravel ? BST ? ACP/PCC ? 8. Roadway width /1O feet Z y ?p 9. Terrain: Level ? Rolling ? Mountainous ? 10. No. of thru lanes 11. ADT 12. Ave. Right of Way width ft. 13• Bike lane? Yes ? No ? ( REPLACEMENT COST ESTIMATE Task Activity Amount Unit Unit Cost Extension Total In Dollars (A) OF WAY RIGH I4•Land Acquisition & Relocation Assistance Acre t r T 15. Utility Relocation (Describe under NOTES below) L.S. ^ j (B) 16. Clearing& Grubbing Acre 2-000 10,4(10 GRADING 17. Roadway Exc., Incl. Haul 7 q BOA CY (2y 5 / 7 18, Borrow, Incl. Haul CY GRADING 19. Other d o o 1 9 5 (?) BASE 20. Base type Ton o0 Z (?•?'"D BASE (D) 21. Crushed surfacing r rnL.LL Ton SURFACING 22• BST ClassA / Mile M779 /'T SURFACING. , 23. ACP/PCC U Ton 0 z e{ y 24. Channel & Ditch Exc. Cvd CY 4 el 7 H 25. a) Culvert & Drain Pipe, installed Zt.0-. c_..hr. 1 b LL -7 p0 1 y 7 Q (E) c•t E'folaa cal b) Culvert & Drain Pipe, Installed Lt. 00 ? ? 7 ?? Se0 DRAINAGE I-ZWT •t1laar c) Culvert & Drain Pipe, Installed v - -W I"D LL lz oo I Z too 26. Riprap I C2 Ton I Sov 11500 27. Structures less than 20' long __ t? Lf (7 n DRAINAGE 28. Other • 29. Signs •5 Ea, yD'?? ZUU (F) 30, Striping & Channelinllon _ ( Mile 00 ) ((] ) I (] TRAFFIC 31. Signals (Exist. intersee. w/slgnals ) C: Inler• i Q (? SERVICES 32. Guardrall,Type ect on s Lf. Q (D FIC 33. Illumination (%exist. Illuminated ) Mile TRAF SERVICES 34. Other h U ;. 35. Sidewalks, ft. wide G SY (G) 36. Bike Paths/trails _ r'l mile 0 U ROADSIDE 37. Fencing,Type .? lti.)TO 'F 0 LL 1 75 /7y(? DEVELOPMENT 38. Erosion Control 0 L S U O DSIDE 39. Landscaping ?. . . Acre o ROA DEVELOPMENT 40. Other ?'1 h (7 •z y NOTES DOT rowsa tao•ea I- a i yf REPLACEMENT CONSTRUCTION COSTS 1. CATEGORY 2 U vp P L30? IDENTIFICATION 2. Road Name la/...vh?"( 3. County ?? a4 O eS G'?•? 4. Route Number S. MP to MP 6. Length :-= Ml. I.i EXISTING GEOMETRICS ?_. 7. Pavement type = Unimproved ? Gravel ? BST ? ACP/PCC ? B. Roadway width 1 7 t feet 9. Terrain: Level O Rolling O Mountainous ? 10. No. of thru lanes 11. ADT 12. Ave. Right of Way width ft. 13. Bike lane? Yes ? No ? t ? LI REPLACEMENT COST ESTIMATE Task Activity Amount Unit Unit Cost Extension Total In Dollars (A) RIGHT OF WAY 14. Land Acquisition & Relocation Assistance Acre 15. Utility Relocation (Describe under NOTES below) L.S. (B) 16. Clearing& Grubbing 3 1o Acre 2000 7Z PQ GRADING 17. Roadway Exc., Incl. Haul (-Soo CY l ?s ) ( -.j -7 s 18. Borrow, incl. Haul O CY O O 19. Other Q GRADING (C) BASE 20. Sasetype ILC-l 63 G+f4v11 ( ic?ss Ton L 11 ? --- j-- - BASE (D) 21. Crushed surfacing / 0 39 Ton )S-0 q p -f / SURFACING... 22. BST,CIassA /7(e 00•yz ( Mile 1° & Q I93(o0 23. ACP/PCC _ n Ton - - _ SURFACING Z 5 5, 24. Channel & Ditch Exc, c/o CY &0 ro- a°P/n n. Ora 25. a) Culvert & Drain Pipe, Installed ?. Nmr.G{IIK b) Culvert & Drain Pipe, Installed r - u tv. Z ) .0 ?. G{ () LL L f. 79-0 1? J y Q DRAINAGE nstalled I-L'r'•T. I ssr.l c) Culvert & Drain Pipe, Installed' d -c-u(v. / ( b Lf. 610 Q 26. Riprap r ?0 ) Ton 15 ?V ) S0 C) 27. Structures less than 20' long O Lf 0 DRAINAGE 28. Other a . 0 7 29. Signs 7 Ea, ?0 n0 Z?0 (F) 30. Striping & Channelizatlon Mlle 0 / / O - - 1 I U TRAFFIC 31. Signals (Exist, intersec. w/signals ) Q eco U Q SERVICES 32. Guardrall,Type s n Lf. 33, Illumination (% exist. Illuminated ) Mile TRAFFIC SERVICES _ 34. Other 0 9 01 35. Sidewalks, ft. wide n SY 0 0 (G) 36. Blke paths/trails 0 Mile 0 G) ROADSIDE 37. Frncing,Type .7 94-)re- _ jz EU _ Lf. DEVELOPMENT 38. Erosion Control L S ? 39. Lmdscaping . . Acre ,Z Q ROADSIDE DEVELOPMENT 40. Other () _ V NOTES I , nO.r Ir1nM Ia0eal 11/ra L? _L T7 REPLACEMENT CONSTRUCTION COSTS F 1. CATEGORY 12- t/0 ?p ? IDENT IFICATION 2. Road N ame -7v?V1 ??•?--- 3. County 3tL?FI QK 4. Route Number S. MP to MP p? - 6. Length MI. EXISTING GEOMETRICS 7. Pavement type = Unimproved ? Gravel ? BST ? ACP/PCC ? 8. Roadway width 1!' L_feet 9. Terrain: Level? Rolling? Mountainous? 10. No. ofthrulanes I1. ADT 12. Ave. Right of Way width _ ft ' 13. Bike lane? Yes ? No ? REPLACEMENT COST ESTIMATE Task Activity Amount Uni t Unit Cost Extension Total In - - (A) Dollars RIGHT OF WAY 14-1-and Acquisition & Relocation Assistance Acre 15. Utility Relocation (Describe under NOTES below) L S OW -? (e) 16. Clearing& Grubbing 53 Acre ZL`X)U I(7 !0/00 GRADING 17. Roadway Exc., incl. Haul C00 - Cy 3)t500 18. Borrow, Incl. Haul D Cy a Q 19. Other ?- \ GRADING - lJ Q (C) BASE 20. Base type !7 "C-1. J5 ?r ro-Ve / 99455 . Ton BASE d s (D) 21, Crushed surfacing )f25-) =--- Ton q)cl ? ? s °O ;x SURFACING J 22. BST,CIassA 17600y- / Mile ( )C1 3(aQ 23 ACP/PCC SURFACING - --?. Ton O p 24. Channel & Ditch Exc. cfv CY Z _ ?o0 1!? 0 ? (E) 25. a) Culvert & Drain Pipe, Installed ¢d. A-,, csty. ` lo? ? L (. Inv ? 17 b DRAINAGE L•tE 7r./ 4n .r b) Culvert & Drain Pipe, Installed l L f 7 1 °-a /r / z U e) Culvert & Drain Pipe, installed--e\v ?u? eo ZI-- 2 LL 7_S G U - 6. RlpraD /SU Ton ) o ZZ S? 27, Structures less than 20' long ? - 28. Other Lf, -- - DRAINAGE 0 ZZZ(o 29. Signs Ea. yO`c 7nil = (F) 30. Striping& Channellaatlon Mile _ 110,19 ) TRAFFIC 31. Signals (Exist. intersec. w/signals ) [0 inter. O SERVICES 32. Guardrail, Type section Lf. - 33, Illumination (% exist. Illuminated ) CJ Mi Q Q TRAFFIC 34. Other le SERVICES - (G) 35. Sidewalks, ft. wide SV t7 (? O 36. Bike paths/trails Mil (•? ROADSIDE DEVELOPMEN 37. F-cit,it, Type e Lf. /? '4 T 38, Erosion Control L.S. 39, Landscaping O Acre ROADSIDE C U 40, Other DEVELOPMENT ( - SUBTOTAL L( -7_4 1_-sl . + Desi gn Engineering at 10% +Cons tructlon Engineering at 15% I - NOTES _ GRAND TOTAL ,r DOT rO"•• s<eost - _J , REPLACEMENT CONSTRUCTION COSTS cnt? l INb bhOMETRICS 7. Pavement type = Unimproved ? Gravel ? BST ? ACP/PCC ? 9. Terrain: Level ? Rolling ? Mountainous ? 11. ADT 12. Ave. Right of Way width RE "' ° 8. Roadway width )n- feet 3 ?p 10. No.ofthrulanes ft. 13. Bike lane? Yes ? NO O - PLACEMENT COST ESTIMATE Task Activity Amount Unit Unit Cost Extension Tutal in Dollars (A) RIGHT OF WAY 14. Land Acquisition & Relocation Assistance Acre 15. Utility Relocation (Describe under NOTES below) L S IW (B) 16. Clearing & Grubbing n •i?PJ Acre coo 1 Z l L O GRADING 17. Roadway Exc., incl. Haul zoLV CY L y 1 Z 7 18. Borrow, incl. Haul O CY _ C 7 19. Other ? a o GRADING (e) BASE 20. Base type 1z "L/ R C re-/a qqg? T 3 3 5 on BASE (0) 21. Crushed surfacing 39 Ton _-° 995 -76 SURFACING 22. BST, CIassA /7,&042 y Mile )s;?('V )q?(p!J 23 ACP/PCC SURFACING . 4?7) Ton O O Z ? 24. Channel & Ditch Exc. (0 L-) CY -!E' 2 q Q (E) 25. 3)Culvert & Drain Pipe, installeAa • A.+,.-i )u. /&(O Lf. 7°-?° - ,P,$Z b) Culvert & Drain Pipe, Inslaile rl"Tr. r sleet ?' X-tutu. - 7foO L!. DRAINAGE •ev t,rsxe? c) Culvert & Drain Pipe, installed ri -c-snly. ?? Lf. I ff L ?SLU 26. Riprap ? Ton ' E? O =? ?0 UO0 27. Structures less than 20' long Q Lf DRAINAG 28. Other . 0 O E 29. Signs s Ea. ;1110 z (F) 30, Striping & Channelizatlon 1 Mlle 04 TRAFFIC 31. Signals (Exist. Intersec. w/signals ain n SERVICES 32. Guardrail, Type C s t Lf CG 33. Illumination (% exist. Illuminated ) U . Mlle G U TRAFFIC S 34. Other ERVICES 3S. Sidewalks, ft. wide •?? SY p L? (G) 36, Bike paths/trolls Q Mlle U ROADSIDE 37. Fencin F _Z ?jZEC(j 7 S DEVELOPMENT 38. Erosion Control C.! 39. Landscaping p Acre ?a e7 ROADSIDE DEVELOPME 40. Other NT z SUBTOTAL IH1 + Design Engineering at 1096 "..?9?-Yy-Ls +Construction Englneerlneat IS% 1 le NOTES GRAND TOTAL l DOT ronra tae•ea __ • .. . K4N ISaq REPLACEMENT CONSTRUCTION COSTS 1. CATEGORY ?'JSG 13?3f'? IDENTIFICATION ??•?? \\,-C?? ` = 3. co?mv Je •C?e?S - • RouteNumber. S• MP to MP . 6. Length L??J ML EXISTING GEOMETRICS `t Pavement type = Unimproved ? Gravel ? BST ? ACP/PCC ? F I 8. Road way width feet ? p Terrain: Level ? Rolling ? Mountainous ? 10. No, o f thru lanes .,, ADT T 12. Ave. Right of Way width ft . 13. Bike lane? Yes ? No O REPLACEMENT COST ESTIMATE Task - Activity Amount Unit Unit Cost Extension Total In f { - - (A) Dollars RIGHT OF WAY 14•Land Acquisition & Relocation Assistance Acre 1S. Utility Relocation (Describe under NOTES below) L.S. W " - (B) 16. Clearing & Grubbing Atre ZGOO 14,_ (o0p GRADING 17. Roadway Exc., Incl. Haul 79,•3 CY 17 -' ?I12.75 18. Borrow, incl. Haul Cy C7 19. Other GRADING BASE 20. Basetype /z"LI g G1-gv/Q /) I'-L Ton M_ ZZ BASE (O) ZZ Z 21. Crushed surfacing Zh7 U SU Ton ?? J (2,3)o i RFACING 22 BST, ClassA ) Mile 17 1q L41 7 1,° q { SURFACING - 23. ACP/PCC Q Ton .. -: ., 1 24. Channel & Ditch Exc. /QQ CY I yoU 25. a) Culvert & Drain Pipe I^e Installed c A ?- , r. r --------- Lt. b) Culvert & Drain Pipe, Instilled • -15 Lf. 17 ' DRAINAGE t-tv c) Culvert & Drain Pipe Install d T,t?s..es i , e x -t-rrly. ( Z G Lf. - ? 7 2b. Riprap -?_ Ton I 5'2 --a, 00C) 27. Structures less than 20' long Q Lf 28. Other L • DRAINAGE O p S 29. Signs 5 Ea. r-IG`° Zd0 (F) 30. Striping & Channelintion -? Mile 72r -?:-t L Z8 1 TRAFFIC 31, Signals (Exist. Intersec, w/signals ) O Imer• . (j ?j SERVICES 32. Guardnll,TYpe C•? section e Lf. l - U 33, Illumination (% exist. Illuminated ) C M O TRAFFIC 34. Other ile SERVICES 35. Sidewalks, ft. wide SY Q C - - (G) 36. Bike paths/milt L? G I ROADSIDE 37. Fencing, Type_ /,2L,, 7Z rr,?1 Mlle Lf S ) q Z? DEVELOPMENT 38, Erosion Control Q . U - U 39. Landscaping Q LS. Acre Q G' ROADSIDE _ 40. Other ? D O DEVELOPMENT ( Z REPLACEMENT CONSTRUCTION COSTS IDENTIFICATION ! ' - 2. Road Name 3. County fL1?Ql-SCT 4. Route Number i_ S. MP to MP f --1 6. Length ML r EXISTING GEOMETRICS 7. Pavement type = Unimproved ? Gravel ? BST ? ACP/PCC ? O 8. Roadway wid th 1?7Qr.feet .?9 ?J .. '-1 9, Terrain; Lcvel? Rolling? Mountainous? 10. No. of ihru lanes 11. ACT 12. Ave. Right of Way width ft. 13. Bike lane] Yes ? No ? REPLACEMENT COST ESTIMATE Task Activity 4 Amount Unit Unit Cost Extension Total In Dollars (A) RIGHT OF WAY 14•Land Acquisition& Relocation Assistance Acre _ 15. Utility Relocation (Describe under NOTES below) L S W (B) 9 16. Clearing & Grubbing --?L? Acre ZGOU _ 17.17 ( ?7 3 GRADING 17. Roadway Exc., Incl. Haul l COt7 , i CY _ 18. Borrow, incl. Haul Cy y t7 . 19. Other (] GRADING BASE 20. Base type 1Z•L ?.\3 C r•w4 )?, ??n) . Ton 7 0--? ZZ•?jZZ BASE El j ? (D) 21. Crushed surfacing o ?1 on oo J ?? r SURFACING 22• CST, CIassA 1 Mile zl,9Nl LI Rvr_• I 23. ACP/PCC Ton SURFACING O D , Z 24. Channel & Ditch Exc. ,c-ta•Plo;.fa,c (Ov CY --'4o- E'- Z4O (E) 25. a) Culvert & Drain Pipe, Installed Ra. paoocnly - - ? Z I (7 LL 70-? 4 7l Q . 16 761 i1.al b) Culvert & Drain Pipe, Installedm w-es.dv 3 10 0 Lt - I ti pv LIZ -, r, s_ LL i DRAINAGE c) Culvert & Drain Pipe, installed e% Iv?1 )7-0 Lt. - - ? !_ =- ?? ZC? 26. Riprap IS0 Tan IS-- 27. Structures less than 20' long Lt Q - 28, Other U . _ DRAINAGE I /l 0 Z L? , 29 Signs ?_ Ea. cV T v (F) 30. Striping & Channelization Mile oo 7 lZn - TRAFFIC AFFIC 31. Signals (Ex6t. Inmrsec. w/signals b Inter see jo n _ r _ SERVICES 32. Gmrdrall, Type d Lt 33, Illumination (%exlst. Illuminated TRAFFIC 34, Other___ Mile SERVICES -? 35. Sidewalks, ft, wide SY (G) 36. Bike paths/trails ? Mile ROADSIDE 37. Fencing, Type -/TG1///-6 Lt ) p? '/0 DEVELOPMENT 38, Erosion Control . L S - ? 39, Landscaping O . . TT ROADSIDE Acre _? rJ DEVELOPMENT 40. Other SUBTOTAL C? G?.Io b I ' I H) + Des l¢n Engintering at 10% 710.,4, +Con struction Engineering at 15% L.?1.1L' jQ? NOTES ... - GRAND TOTAL ?I'S'GZ II ( ~ I oor.o»x,t.te.eaa t/,e -- I I 'yr1.4-!+l "^^'_- _..-...,.--- - •.,+ovwru?aR•=e'rc+rvratWez,mvrmx :maro+r. ,?.,...-..,.:.. _ r ) n 1 1. CATEGORY-750 b C3 H' L? IDENTIFICATION 2. Road N.M. ??"t t/HwV.B.•c??. 3.County .?tL-q.Cd-Scrl 4. Route Number. 5. MP In MP 6. Length [::?= MI. EXISTING GEOMETRICS 7. Pavement type = Unimproved ? Gravel ? BST ? ACP/PCC ? 8. Roadway width Z/t feet 77 9. Terrain: Level ? Roiling ? Mountainous ? 10. No. of thru lanes 11. ADT 12. Ave. Right of Way width ft. 13• Bike lane? Yes ? No ? s REPLACEMENT COST ESTIMATE Task Activity Amount Unit Unit Cost Extension Total In Dollars (A) 14 Land Ac uisition & Relocation Assistance Acre Oly RIGHT OF WAY , q 15. Utility Relocation (Describe under NOTES below) L.S. 16 & G bbi Cl i {4 SrSR Acre /? ?¢ 0 (B) . ng ru ng ear _ Haul Ro a Exc incl 17 d )U,?y CY GRADING a w y ., . . ow Haul Bo Incl 18 U CY O O GRADING , . rr . 19. Other _sL Z (D (C) e 12"G1 13 ficata. ? Base t 20 Il /? Ton _7 7 Z ?,2Z BASE BASE . yp , Z- 7--',,-7-. 7A (D) Crushed surfacin 21 t*) -7 Ton S_6 0, 32 O SURFACING g . BST Cl A 22 ? Mile 2- j, 9y1 z1}ciU/ SURFACING ass . , - 23. ACP/PCC _ 0 Ton _rZ ^) 3 Channel & Ditch Exc 24 go CY c? ) & -& . . I4la'i?lgi.l eCnC, installed 2A. Pn^r•a .,kQ. t & Dr Pi ) C l i 25 Z I LL p 0 ?- I 7 n (E) ver . a u a n pe, a`g' Tea Stott installed b) Culvert & Drain Pipe Z y U Lf. O? ) 7 L.((]RO DRAINAGE , 'Z4"rr.l st- C) Culvert & Drain Pipe, Installed Y-4-k.. Lt. Z1 pv ) 7 ?O 26 Ri / - 7 Ton 1 S 0 / . prap Structures less than 20' long 27 e.> Lf y U DRAINAGE . 28. Other . q (. ns Si 29 ?U Ea. X10 - _ . . g Striping A Channelizatlon 30 Mile zZc? pp 55 a (F) • nals ) w/si se l (E i t I t 31 Si ? Inl°r• Q n TRAFFIC g gna s x s . n er c. . Gu c 32 d ll T - ? section Lf. /? ? --• A? SERVICES . ar ra , yp 33 Illuminated ) Illumination (% exist f L c Mile - ^, y -?- TRAFFIC SERVICES . , ? - -- / , 0 n 34. Other Z wide Sidewalks ft 35 G SY / 6) (G) , . . Bike Paths/trolls 36 / s Mlle 0 V ROADSIDE . Fencing Type 37 SZ?1] Lt. qq y? DEVELOPMENT , . Erosion Cont 38 ol y L S ? ROADSIDE . r Landscaping 39 U . . Acre - DEVELOPMENT , 40. Other --- NOTES p 1-- i DoT ro?M r.e.ea. REPLACEMENT CONSTRUCTION COSTS EXISTING GEOMETRICS 7. Pavement type = Unimproved ? Gravel ? BST ? ACP/PCC ? 8. Roadwa y width ?2[J feet L17 p 9. Terrain: Level ? Rolling ? Mountainous O 10. No. of thru lanes _ 11. ADT 12. Ave. Right of Way width ft. 13. Bike lane? Yes O No ? REPLACEMENT COST ESTIMATE Task Activity Amount Unit Unit Cost Extension Total in (A) RIGHT OF WAY 14-Land Acquisition & Relocation Assistance Acre 1S. Utility Relocation (Describe under NOTES below ) L.S. (B) 16. Clearing& Grubbing p ?•?5 Acre GRADING 17. Roadway Exc., incl. Haul 2 ab CY ?S 18. Borrow, Incl. Haul CY 19. Other U (c) BASE 20. Baset ? vo.( 5 o 1-+.c;- -?-a_ Ton (D) 21. Crushe su, -1-1?-7 Ton SURFACING 7 22. BST, Cya 3 Mile 23. ACP/P To n ? 24. Channe. CY 4 U (E g-r2'7q• c• 25. a) Culve, Instilledes s:, . ? t? 15 Lf a? ) z•tP 7,(5vaar b) Culvpe, Installed 7-0 Lf DRAINAGE c) Culvert&Drain Pipe, Installe b U Lf zf 26. Riprap X0/7 . Ton / 27. Structures less than 20' long L( 28. Other . 29. Signs Ea. (F) 30. Striping & Channellaatlon Mile Z TRAFFIC 31, Signals(Exist. intersee. w/signals Inter SERVICES 32. Guardrail, Type section Lf 33. Illumination N exist. Illuminated ) Mlle 34. Other 35. Sldewalk s, ft. wide SY (G) 36. Bike paths/Inlls Milc ROADSIDE -r 37. Fencing, Type alelfr U Lf, 7-Li in DEVELOPMENT 38. Erosion Control L 39. Landscaping , Acre DEVELOPMENT 40. Other =L !T01 Dollars o 900 -5 j o U GRADING BASE ZV(SV SURFACING U ?l3 O z ! LZU S f v ° 1 5 0 b O DRAINAGE ? Gov TRAFFIC SERVICES ? ROADSIDE zo p REPLACEMENT CONSTRUCTION COSTS IDENTIFICATION 2. Road Name ::S? 4. Route Number. S. MP to MP j IDENTIFICATION r 2. Road Name 3, County V2Qt-S C)ti-?, 4• Route Number S. MP to MP 6, Length MI. REPLACEMENT CONSTRUCTION COSTS 1• CATEGORY l11' S20 P-(-t r SUBTOTAL ,,? aJ 9 (H) + Design Engineering at 10% + Construction Engineering at 15%sJ GRANDTOTAL NOTES _ REPLACEMENT COST ESTIMATE Task Activity Amount Unit Unit Cost Extension Total in Dollars (A) RIGHT OF WAY 14.La rd Acquisition & Relocation Assistance Acre 15. Utility Relocation (Describe under NOTES below) L.S. (B) 16. Clearing & Grubbing 3,LOLI Acre Zmo SO -7 Z. SO GRADING 17. Roadway Exc., Incl. Haul "C,00 CY I ?S 1 '] SDU 18. Borrow, Incl. Haul C1> CY _ d d N 19. Other e7 GRADI G Z (C) BASE 20. Basetype 1Z°C.\.3 Gt-cva? ?O Ton Z-°= Z(. )` CQ BASE Z11 (D) 21. Crushed surfacing I J 7 Ton Soo 9 SURFACING 22• BST,ClassA 1?,?23 Mile SURFACING 23. ACP/PCC C> Ton 24. Channel & Ditch Exc. <) CY 25. a)Culvert & Drain Pipe, Installed U. Ppc cuts. _ 31 Lf. 7oo T 7 (E) b) pe, sr8"Tr./5+s/ Culvert & Drain Pi Installed r-cam wa ?ZU LL 0F ? ? , DRAINAGE a c)Culvert &Drain Pipe, Installed r-r.a.Nsr (00 Lf 00 ZII 26. Riprap 100 . Ton 27. Structures less than 20' long d Lf d DRAINAGE 28• Other 6 S 29, Signs ?U Ea. y0_ goo (F) 30. Striping & Channellratlon Mlle Zz _ zz f?_ TRAFFIC 31. Signals (Exist. intersec. w/signals ) Intar• Se tt.r SERVICES 32. Guardrail, Type Q Lf• TT U /' O 33. Illumination(%exist, Illuminated ) O Mlle D o TRAFFIC SERVICES 34. Other b t] v 17 35. Sidewalks, ft. wide 0 SY \ 6 r) (G) 36. Bike paths/trail[ _ _I-') Mlle 0 0 ROADSIDE 37. Fencing,Type_. 110/t- -T2-qt-() Lf. '' %:q6 DEVELOPMENT 38. Erosion Control /1 L S U ' 39, Landscaping 0 . . Acre ROADSIDE DEVELOPMENT 40. Other _ . /t) i EXISTING GEOMETRICS 7. Pavement type = Unimproved ? Gravel ? BST ? ACP/PCC ? 8. Roadway width Z 1+ feet SS?/p ` 9. Terrain: Level ? Rolling ? Mountainous ? 10. No. of thru lanes 11. ADT 12. Ave. Right of Way width ft. 13• Bike lane? Yes O No O is 1. CATEGORY U-50Cr0 P-C?p) I IDENTIFICATION 2• Road Name ?^ s 3. County lrL?-L3-r?a 0-r? 4. Route Number 5. MP to MP 6. Length E== Mi. REPLACEMENT COST ESTIMATE Task Activity Amount Unit Unit Cost Extension Total in Dollars (A) RIGHT OF WAY 14, Land Acquisition & Relocation Assistance Acre 15. Utility Relocation (Describe under NOTES below) L.S. (B) 16. Clearing & Grubbing s,&Z Act, Woo ) 0 GRADING 17. Roadway Exc., Incl. Haul 1 •000 CY 125 31 500 18. Borrow, Incl. Haul o CY CD RADING 19. Other Ci ( 7 G erl 1 y (C) 20. Basetyi,e IZrG? 13 Cr CC?V¢f 1219Z-I Ton z O (?? L7 -5, B BASE _ , , ASE Z58N (D) 21. Crushed surfacing Z4 Z5' Ton ?J ?"" Z !1 L 5 SURFACING 22• BST, Class A 23,4(,7 j" ? Mile 2 ?7 G.S,S!3 SURFACING 23. ACP/PCC Ton C 24. Channel & Ditch Exc. La C) Cy r / 0 0 7 0 IS-rs"Pbi.c o•sc• , 25. a) Culvert & Drain Pipe, installed el•a.?or r,, w _ 3 (s LL Otl -7 Z 7 0 5- (E) } v b) Culvert & Drain Pipe, Installed -tS?ie4•ly I 1 (7 Lf. _ DRAINAGE s Tr15 I C) Culvert & Drain Pipe, Installed L v= c l1V ? O Lf -z (o? 1 y 70 26. Riprap .:5'0 . Ton e, _!s- ?.so 27. Structures less than 20' long _ Lt (r) O DRAINAGE 28. Other U . O y s 29. Signs Z Ea. Alpo (F) 30• Striping & Channellzatlon Mil e rig TRAFFIC 31. Signals (Exist. intersec. w/signals--) Int•r• Q SERVICES 32. Guardraii,Type section Lf. •) 33. Illumination (% exist. Illuminated ) y Mile y TRAFFIC SERVICES 34, Other 35. Sidewalks, ft. wide SY (G) 36. Bike paths/1,211% Mile U t? ROADSIDE 37. F,ncing,TYp, T wrra. ,sa?C) Lf 1's gZ? DEVELOPMENT 38. Erosion Control • L S ? ' 39. Landscaping i? . . Acre ROADSIDE DEVELOPMENT 40. Other 0 9 Z ,7L V EXISTING GEOMETRICS 7. Pavement type = Unimproved ? Gravel ? BST ? ACP/PCC ? 8. Roadway width ul+ feet 9. Te-In: Level ? Rolling ? Mountainous ? 10. No. of thru lanes 11• ADT 12. Ave. Right of Way width ft. 13. Bike lane? Yes? N.0 - ) I I a ,.? NOTES DOT .onsa r,mou _ up• REPLACEMENT CONSTRUCTION COSTS 11 1 r Ir - ¦ REPLACEMENT COST ESTIMATE Task Activity Amount Unit Unit Cost Extension Total In Dollars (A) OF WAY RIGH 14, Land Acquisition & Relocation Assistance Acre T 15. Utility Relocation (Describe under NOTES below) L-S. N, (B) 16. Clearlog & Grubbing CL Act. ?? 1 1 GRADING 17. Roadway Exc., incl. Haul ZO?rtx? CY 18. Borrow, incl. Haul 0 CY C) ' 19. Other _ _0 Q GRADING ? (C) SE 20. Base type 12r?G1• R GTr../a ? IZI 615-7 .Ton ZST - B BA ASE (D) 21. Crushed surfacing z3 Ton SURFACING 22. BST, ClassA Mile Q Q SURFACING' 23. ACP/PCC - Ton 2,?lze- y?09__ 5 24. Channel & Ditch Exc. CY 4 AS t!O u.?y"f?lal,v u,a. 25. a) Culvert & Drain Pipe, Installed rI -. c..dv. U z Lf, oG (E) 41e"Tr.\s+.a b) Culvert & Drain Pipe, Installed s • ut \v. Z!5 0 Lf. -t 4 7 &0 DRAINAGE x-24"Tr.l stow C) Culvert & Drain Pipe, installed X-tat Iy. 1,40 Lt, Z Z4'-/O 26. Riprap Ton / 5O-' J tiU 27. Structures less than 20' long U, d O DRAINAGE 28. Other _?_ ?Z d 1 1 (a 29. Signs ?0 Ea. q0 C) (F) 30. Striping A Channelitallon mile z? 'Zzs TRAFFIC 31, Signals (Exist. Inlersec, w/signals ) _0 Inler' see to n . SERVICES 32. Gtnrdrall,Type _n Lf. 33. Illumination (% exist. Illuminated ) O Mile TRAFFIC SERVICES 34. Other (? n L z 35. Sidewalks, ft. wide SY O (G) 36. Bike paths/trails Mlle d ROADSIDE DEVELOPMENT 37, rencing,Type ?Gd/ra 38, Erosion Control r O?[? d Lf. L.S. - 39. Landscaping C-? Acre CD O ROADSIDE DEVELOPMENT 40. Other n 40 ) ) 5 r . NOTES e.- 14 -612 DOT n/n a I 6- SUBTOTAL ?S Sq? (14) ? Design Engineering at 10% rs '?t 2 ?Cons[ructlon Engineering at lS%? GRANDTOTAL 1 il'9ip= r - N_KNEAEWNW? REPLACEMENT CONSTRUCTION COSTS CATEGORY C IDENTIFICATION (•?, - - 2. Road Name _(n_"yvy rt?.0?? "\ 3. County .Sf1 H.C CS Grp ,.. 4. Route Number 5. MP to MP 6. Length Mi. REPLACEMENT COST ESTIMATE Task Activity Amount Unit Unit Cost Extension Dotal In Dollars (A) Land Acquisition & Relocation Assistance 14 Acre RIGHT OF WAY , 15. Utility Relocation (Describe under NOTES below) L.S. Clearin & Grubbing 16 q? g5 Acre ?0? ?r?j???.??? k` (B) GRADING g . 17. Roadway Exc., incl. Haul JOtooO CY 12E 11,.1500 Haul incl Borrow 18 0 Cy O GRADING . , . 19. Other fJ (C) Base type r2L I, g rn.v/a.I 20 17 / ?7 Ton :3 1`4 BASE BASE . ? z S 4 (D) 21. Crushed surfacing 7- 10 7S Ton pO /? SURFACING ClassA 22 BST d Mile SURFACING . , 23. ACP/PCC 010 LS4SS If Ton Z0? Channel & Ditch Exc. 24 140 CY 4 c? o . Installed ¢e-A_ I-ro. a)Culvert& Drain Pipe 25 G I > Lf ?- I L1 ?U , . b) Culvert & Drain Pipe, installed Y -C_u W . 1 DRAINAGE r-l.r' 1?, 1 Sim e)Culvert & Drain Pipe, Installed X-as•ty. 70 LL pO Zi 1 t1 l 70 26. Riprap /0 Ton , _- O° l Q Structures less than 20'long 27 1 f V [? DRAINAGE . 28. Other . . n I 7 r? ns Si 29 Ea. _10 a- ' r `1oo (F) g . 30. Striping & Channelintion m;[. 7-- . 7- r19_ w/signals ) Intersec Signals (Exist 31 ? ect TRAFFIC . . . Guardrail e 32 T - C> s ion Lf U TR FFIC SERVICES , . yp 33 Ill i ti Ill i t d ) (% i . Mile 4l A SERVICES . um na on ex st. um na e 34. Other G p wide Sidewalks ft 35 SY 0 i (G) , . . Bike paths/tniis 36 Mile a G ROADSIDE . 37. Fencing, Type Lf. t,[?? qy DEVELOPMENT Erosion Cont 38 ol L S 0 ROADSIDE ' . r Landsca 39 in . . Acre C7 L1 DEVELOPMENT . p g 40. Other REPLACEMENT CONSTRUCTION COSTS 1. CATEGORY UI - S??F}C'-?O ; . L IDENTIFICATION 2. Road Name 3. County 4. Route Number to MP 6. Length .? Mfg fa. EXISTING GEOMETRICS 7. Pavement type = Unimproved ? Gravel ? BST ? ACP/PCC ? S. Roadway width L(J't feet 9. Terrain: Level ? Rolling ? Mountainous ? 10. No. of thru lanes 11. ADT 12. Ave. Right of Way width ft. 13. Bike lane? Yes ? No ? > rL'. I REPLACEMENT COST ESTIMA"I"E Task Activity Am-rt Unit Unit Cost Extension Total in Dollars (A) RIGHT OF WAY 14. Land Acquisition & Relocation Assistance Acre 15. Utility Relocation (Describe under NOTES below) L.S. (B) 16. Clearing & Grubbing G S•33 Acre ZOOV ?,Ir/n GRADING 17. Roadway Exc., incl. Haul Cy X75 L?O. ZLJU 18. Bor:ow, Incl. Haul CY , GRADING 19. Other ? 3 (.? (C) 20. Basetype ZZ"C2, Mvd.I ? ZI Ton Ze`O BASE BASE 2 3 (D) 21. Crushed surfacing Ton SURFACING 22. BST ClassA Mile SURFACING , 23. ACP/PCC _ G20 aG I.F?SAitp,,? Z 7_ x 4 Ton 4(01 `)IC' c 'r 24. Channel & Ditch Exc. - . \ CY e,4 IJ•ri"WCmk c 25. a) Culvert & Drain Pipe, InstalledYA - wPn.1 ?Jq_ Lt. 7T I y70 - (E) a-t6 S4 a fTr.l b) Culvert & Drain Pipe, Installed x. - nu 1u. _ I uo LL 00 DRAINAGE I•L4"7.1 54 aa. c)Culvert & Drain Pipe, installed '[-curly 2 Lf. Z1 I 1 70 26. Riprap _ Ton )Soy 75O 27. Structures less than 20'long Lf. D O DRAINAGE 28. Other_ _? U (c I d 29. Signs I Z- Ea. y F o (F) 30. Striping & Channelization I Mlle Z7 ?J z Z? TRAFFIC 31. Signals (Exist. lntersec. w/signats ) d inter- ?} Q SERVICES 32. Guardrall,Type section Lf. ^ 33. Illumination (% exist Illuminated ) Mile U TRAFFIC SERVICES . 34. Other 1 y 35. Sidewalks, ft, wide SY CD (G) 36. Bike paths/trails LID Mlle 0 U ROADSIDE 37. Frncing,TYpe -T i(,) - )3ZU Lf. ? ? 7 I DEVELOPMENT 38. Erosion Control e?) L S. , SIDE 39. Landscaping l"1 . Acre e) ROAD DEVELOPMENT 40, Other 'C 1 l NOTES I ronra t aeeaa Dul• _ __ I •4r,?.?.. r i?v r I : t t i 9 fkk l' I SUBTOTAL (H) +Design Engineering at 10% s s z r a 1a i t IS% L i I l E i c - - -J ? neer nga - • - +Constru on ng t -. GRANOTOTAL ?Ct?.11J1.L..1 - I t f ? REPLACEMENT COST ESTIMATE Task Activity Amount Unit Unit Cost Extension Total in Dollar (A) RIGHT OF WAY 14, Land Acquisition & Relocation Assistance Acre 15. Utility Relocation (Describe under NOTES below) L.S RO (B) 16. Clearing & Grubbing Acre 7000 ?Z, GRADING 17. Roadway Exc., Incl. Haul 7q, °.r?7 CY '7S 18. Borrow, incl. Haul C7 CY C::> CD 19. Other GRADING 9 s (C) BASE 20. Base type 1Z ?L?G T0.yd1 -Q rJ51 Ton 7 17/UZ BASE ?. 7 (D) 21. Crushed surfacing I , rl Ton 60 SURFACING 22. BST, ClassA Mile - SURFACING 23. ACP/PCC Ton 24. Channel & Ditch Exc. ?Q CY r-/ } 12"Alan! •nc, 25. a)Culvert & Drain PIPe, Installed rA.F-.,.. n.i••, r^ LL y y I (E) b-?ti^r..tss.a b) Culvert & Drain Pipe, Installed a -c- W, Z L: [? Lf. ) eC 19 DRAINAGE, z-2vr" 1 5<<.t C) Culvert & Drain Pipe, Installed X -c.' Iv I ZO Lf Z I °-° 7 SZ» 26. Riprap 70p . Ton 1511Q 27. Structures less than 20' long G Lf U C? DRAINAGE 28. Other . z i l 29. Signs Ea. yDe" ZU (F) 30. Striping & Channellaation O Mile C) TRAFFIC 31• Signals (Exist. Intersec. w/signals ) Inter SERVICES 32. Guardrail, Type section Lf• 33• Illuminalion (%exist• illuminated ) Mile TRAFFIC SERV CES 34. Other I 35. Sidewalks, ft. wide CJ SY U Q (G) 36. Bike paths/trails Mile Q ROADSIDE 37. Fencing,Type JJ2 Wr?G '75 DEVELOPMENT 38, Erosion Control <l L S ' 39. Landscaping C'1 . . Acre ROADSIDE DEVELOPMENT 40. Other yczo SUBTOTAL I 3 I - IH) + Design Engineering at 10% l_fltu ?' ?? - +Construction Engineering at IS% ? p , NOTES GRAND TOTAL •?.?a4t8 00T rartaa•eea t t/n • 7! »:^Y411"' •,SP:.pfW,,:.:,TTX?-J r'NT,°3i119cm - s ? _ REPLACEMENT CONSTRUCTION COSTS ).CATEGORY 2-100-6 (ZL?I EXISTING GEOMETRICS 7. Pavement type = Unimproved ? Gravel ? BST ? ACP/PCC ? 8. Roadway width I (?-I br feet 3 1 ??O 9. Terrain: Level ? Rolling ? Mountainous ? 10. No. of Ihru lanes CC 11. ADT 12. Ave. Right of Way width ft. 13. Bike lane? Yes ? No ? i REPLACEMENT COST ESTIMATE Task Activity Amount Unit Unit Cost Extension Total in Dollars (A) RIGHT OF WAY 14•Land Acquisition & Relocation Assistance Acre 15. Utility Relocation (Describe under NOTES below) L.S. OW (g) 16. Clearing & Grubbing 5 1-213 Acre . 2020 1( (W'0 GRADING 17. Roadway Exc., Incl. Haul I R.nnr) CY ) 7y ?i 400 1 18. Borrow, Incl. Haul U CY O n N 19. Other n n __? GRADI G ?1 Z I (? O (C) BASE 20. Base type 1Z" Cl' s C' rmvco t J 5 / Ton zoo 1-7, 10 BASE Z (D) 21. Crushed surfacing 1 S5z Ton :5 !ov SURFACING 22 BST, Class A. C`7 Mile N 23. ACP/PCC . Ton 0_ O G..... SURFACI ? ? 6 D 24. Channel & Ditch Exc. 1?00 CY C./ !° ZLID 25. a) Culvert & Drain Pipe, Installed Cs. A-. r ?W ? Lf. _ (E) e•.6°Tr.rss.al b) Culvert & Drain Pipe, installed x-mlv. ?(OO LL 00 !n 1 DRAINAGE +•LV"7.i51au1 e) Culvert & Drain Pipe, installed+ 6 - a i tv ) 7-0 Lf Z O 26. Riprap - Sf7 . Ton )S°' 7;'.S0 27. Structures less than 20' long n Lf O O DRAINAGE 28. Other ?> . P n) 1 29. Signs Ea. (F) 30. Striping& Channeliaation Mlle y TRAFFIC 31. Signals (Exist, Imersec. w/s(gnals ) Q Inter i SERVICES 32. Guardrail, Type (-% ec st on Lf. 33. Illumination (% exist. illuminated ) y Mile f7 _ (7 TRAFFIC SERVICES 34. Other - 1 (? v 35. Sidewalks, ft. wide SY (G) 36. Bike paths/trails Mlic O ROADSIDE 37. Fenclnjyise -')- W ICd< C, C) Lf. I b9 -;? O DEVELOPMENT 38. Erosion Control C? L.S. O - 39. Landscaping ?. Acre (-I ROADSIDE DEVELOPMENT 40, Other !r' _ /? 1 ,6• IDENTIFICATION 2. Road Name 3. County SQ'C }4rSOM1 4. Route Number S. MP to MP -? 6. Length MI. REPLACEMENT CONSTRUCTION COSTS LCATEGORY -101 -C-(Z41L?5 EXISTING GEOMETRICS 1 I? 7. Pavement type = ,Unimproved ? Gravel ? BST ? ACP/PCC ? B. Roadway width /7+ _ feet -) L4 ?p 9. Terrain: Level ? Rolling[] Mountainous O 10. No. of thru lanes _ 11. ADT 12. Ave, Right of Way width ft. 13. Bike lane? Yes ? N.0 REPLACEMENT COST ESTIMATE Task J Activity Amount Unit Unit Cost Extension Total in Dollars (A) RIGHT OF WAY 14. Land Acquisition & Relocation Assistance Acre 15. Utility Relocation (Describe under NOTES below) L.S. f RPW (B) 16. Clearing & Grubbing y?3(0 Acre 2000 GRADING 17. Roadway Exc., incl. Haul ti00 CY 1!5' 1132 5' 18. Borrow, Incl. Haul n CY a 0 19. Other (7 ?_Z ("? GRADING 7 O Q S (?) BASE 20. Base [Y Pe -C1- , I 11.VI fZv S I Ton 9 Z 1 7JOZ B ASE l) (D) 21. Crushed surfacing I SSZ Ton ,Soo ?7L O SURFACING 22. BST, ClassA - l) Mile 23. ACP/PCC' d Ton SURFACING 24. Channel & Ditch Exc. ?q (7 CY 7 4 (? 25. a) Culvert & Drain Pipe, Installed C-1•q+ r?.lv. Z. ( Lf. 7 °D 59' Z b) Culvert & Drain Pipe, Instilled v""" O Lf. 1 -7_ 710 L DRAINAGE ;r, 1 s Vaa I c) Culvert & Drain Pipe, Installed r x-r u Iv. (120 Lf 7 I °•- I 7_ & 0 26. Riprap loo , Ton I ' 5 y) 27. Structures less than 20' long U Lf _ O DRAINAGE 28. Other _C-) . _? [) (? U 29. Signs 7 Ea. ZOO (F) 30. Striping & Channeliaatlon Mile O TRAFFIC 31. Signals (Exist. Intersec. w/signals ) Inter• Q O SERVICES 32. Guardrall,Type section Lf. O 33. Illumination (% exist. Illuminated ) O Mlle U U TRAFFIC SERVICES 34. Other n ?_ Q 7 35. Sidewalks, ft. wide SY U O (G) 36. Bike paths/trails h mile n n ROADSIDE 37. Fencing, Type -77- Lt-)l/C- L f DEVELOPMENT 38. Erosion Control . L S U ' 39. Landscaping r7 . . Acre _ ROADSIDE DEVELOPMENT 40. Other _?` f7 ?_ .5, t1 ?dvisad REPLACEMENT CONSTRUCTION COSTS 1. CATEGORY e )oc?lzv! d REPLACEMENT COST ESTIMATE Task Activity Amount Unit Unit Cost Extension Total in Dollars (A) RIGH OF WAY 14•Land Acquisition & Relocation Assistance Acre T 15. Utility Relocation (Describe under NOTES below) L.S. (B) 16. Clearing & Grubbing C(• ?? Acre _??:JU 7Z? GRADING 17. Roadway Exc., incl. Haul (6S(2C7 CY ) 15: 11 t 1 18. Borrow, incl. Haul Cy 0 - - - GRADING 19. Oth..r -- (C) BASE 20. Basetype ?-)•f Cs?nva? ?'?'S'SI Ton Seca 1] ?(JZ BASE j (D) 21. Crushed surfacing 155?- Ton ?5_° 7 7(00 SURFACING 22. BST, Class A ( Mile O C7 SURFACING 23. ACP/PCC 1!5Z5 Ton L70_' 3Q":70Z 3 U 24. Channel & Ditch Exc. ? U CY o? 25. a) Culvert & Drain Pipe, Installedc'••?'?•.. ?• o Z. (C? Lf. 'l o-? 70 (E) 5"' r,.t s+. l b) Culvert &Drain Pipe, Installed n L(, 1 DRAINAGE 'z4 Tl'?al e)Culvert &Drain Pipe, installed n- e- isr (?.U L{, ° 7-1 °° 26. RlpraP 50 Ton IS°= 7S C? 27. Structures less than 20' long G Lt. O ?J DRAINAGE 28. Other C7 ?7 C") (? 7 29. Signs J Ea. ?lD v J s 044 ) (FI 30. Striping & Channelintion ) Mile )) U _ ( l ep TRAFFIC 31. Signals (Exist. Intersec. w/signals ) L Imer• i C7 SERVICES 32. Guardrall,Type _ sect on Lf. [) 33. Illumination (%exist. Illuminated ) 11 -7 Mlle G TRAFFIC SERVICES 34, Other 35. Sidewalks, ft. wide l%• SY C l (G) 36. Bike paths(iralls Mile ell C ROADSIDE 37. Fencing, Type T t4?1 I- Z?40 Lf el DEVELOPMENT 38. Erosion Control t% . L S C-' •G DSIDE 39. Landscaping C-7 . . Acre ROA DEVELOPMENT 40. Other <7 C-1 I F I SUBTOTAL ??JJ Z- - i. ? P - - • ... L (H) g 1 ? Design Engineering at 10%?1_LLIJ 4 Construction Engineering at IS% r GRAND TOTAL n NOTES DOT mesa ue•oaa vpa `yw?e,...-.•.-•.• .......... i +ev*?nnewvnawae,wrn...xm..-?- --•--^`m . _ i L _. .t REPLACEMENT CONSTRUCTION COSTS IDENTIFICATION 2. Road Name 4. Route Number S. MP to Mp EXISTING GEOMETRICS 7. Pavement type = Unimproved ? Gravel ? BST ? ACP/PCC ? 8. Roadway width feet 9. Terrain: Level ? Rolling ? Mountainous ? 10. No. of thru lanes _ 11. ADT 12. Ave. Right of Way width ft, 13. Bike lane? Yes ? No ? - I A REPLACEMENT COST ESTIMATE Activity Amount Unit Unit Cost Extension Total In Dollars 4.Land Acquisition & Relocation Assistance Acre 5. Utility Relocation (Describe under NOTES below) L.S. . Clearing & Grubbing Acre /O M . Roadway Exc., Ind. Haul 2-G Cy / 7S ?I SL C? . Borrow, incl. Haul CY . ? ? . Other ?-j GRADING I . Base type T 1 oz on w BASE . Crushed surfacing 21 Ton t7 , BST, ClassA Mile ACP/PCC OLO G?1-' li}` 7}\Q?T ? SURFACING . il ?s.?= Ton ? ?.? 3 ( ff 24. Channel & Ditch Exc. COO CY yvv 7 N O o ri"F`Iri, cn 25. a) Culvert & Drain Pipe, installed ¢d•q?pn GJ i. ! z / b Lf ?nO 1 LOID (E) e- a as+KI b) Culvert & Drain Pipe, Instilled x - a,w ' ? ??? =s'?_ . Lf. 7 ao _ r > ?? ?=? DRAINAGE inl c) r-Ly Culvert & Drain Pipe, Installed x -c."d.AU ? lf ?-1 '? , 26. Rlprap . Ton 1-5o - 27. Structures less than 20' long Lf 0 0 DR 28. Other . _ O AINAGE 29. Signs Ea. QO (F) 30. Striping S Channell:aUon Mile ??-' TRAFFIC 31. Signals (Exist. Intersec. w/signals ) y Intar• _ d SERVICES 32. Guardrail, Type section Lf C) 0 33. Illumination (% exist, Illuminated ) . Mile d C7 TRAFFIC 34, Other C7 0 C:) SERVICES 35, $Idewatks, ft, wide SY (G) 36. Bike paths/trails d Mlle t? ROADSIDE 37. Fencing,Type T wl\_Q. Lf. 7t z, v DEVELOPMENT 38, Erosion Control C:? L S V d . 39. Landscapinr U . . Acre 0 ROADSIDE DEVEL 40, Other Q /T OPMENT To (H) 4 Design Engineering at 10% ( - ? +Conclructlon Engineering at 15% - NOTES GRAND TOTAL .?I y7? e 00T ronsa sao eu _ ? c REPLACEMENT CONSTRUCTION COSTS 1. CATEGORY IZ-4PU A(30 I I.': - ,d.. i -I P' H REPLACEMENT COST ESTIMATE Task Activity Amount Unit Unit Cost Extension Total in Dollars (A) i i Acre RIGHT OF WAY stance on Ass 14.1-and Acquisition & Relocat 15. Utility Relocation (Describe under NOTES below) L.S. y!e0 Act, ZGOO ? ?- (B) 16. Clearing & Grubbing Haul incl E d CY -1`- , ? 7)r.?'7< GRADING . xc., way 17. Roa 0 Cy GRADING 18. Borrow, Incl. Haul 19. Other (C) lLlrG?, B Gre`va( 9709 Ton BASE BASE 20. Base type 9 04, (D) d surfacin h 1 C 1--7 Ca / ? T°^ S'O-= g rus e . 2 SURFACING Mile SURFACING 22, BST, ClassA ) 1 Pl4 rr ? F ? 1 ?7?00 Ton s 7S C. 23. ACP/PCC M h E l & Di Cy -?`?- xc. tc 24. Channe JU•t2"I?IQII?Lat ' %oneiJs'. d F1 A Z10 LL 7- 7 c--:;, , ; 25. a) Culvert & Drain Pipe, Installe ! ' a (E) .toe 4- t? •/ installed- euly. lvert &Drain Pipe b) C Z c/(] Lf. ) 1 _1-SlSt- DRAINAGE , u r•L•/"-• 1S1 ea/ installed Y• •uJv c) Culvert & Drain Pipe (!(J Lf. LIO "'G --7- (ro , 100 Ton IT- I z:;n e7l 26. RipraP h 0' l 0 Lf e0f) D DRAINAGE ong an 2 27. Structures less t • , 28. Other i 7 Ea. 7 Q ?? gns 29. S n ti Ch li Mile .... it (F) anne aa o 30. Striping& Inter - 45) TRAFFIC 31. Signals (Exist. Intersect. w/signals ) section 0 Lf C) 0 TRAFFIC SERVICES 32. Guardrail, Type , Mlle d SERVICES 33. Illumination (% exist, Illuminated ) 34. Other U O a --) O SY U (G) 35. Sidewalks, ft. wide Mlle U ROADSIDE 36. Bike paths/trails ( JIrG _y! / Z Lf. 7 10 DEVELOPMENT { 37. Fencing,Typ, _ O L S 0 C ROADSIDE 38. Erosion Control . . Acre - e-1 DEVELOPMENT 39. Landscaping Oth 0 er , 4 IDENTIFICATION 2. Road Name -:;-(•V1?vY•r?A.,?.-,\ 3. County ,?Q r}er°,o?? 4. Route Number S. MP to MP 6. Length E:= MI. REPLACEMENT CONSTRUCTION COSTS t I. CATEGORY EXISTING GEOMETRICS 7. Pavement type = Unimproved ? Gravel ? BST ? ACP/PCC ? 8. Roadway width feet 9. Terrain: Level ? Rolling ? Mountainous ? 10. No. of thru lanes 11. ADT 12. Ave. Right of Way width ft. 13. Bike lane? Yes 0 No O REPLACEMENT COST ESTIMATE Task Activity Amount Unit Unit Cost Extension Total In Dollars (A) 14. Land Acquisition & Relocation Assistance Acre 9 RIGHT OF WAY 15. Utility Relocation (Describe under NOTES below) L.S. f (B) 16. Clearing & Grubbing r"b& Acre ZGOU 9700 GRADING 17. Roadway Exc., Ind. Haul /DICGl? Cy 175-912 incl. Haul Borrow 18 CY a GRADING , . 19. Other n D (C) /2GJ. /?s (_-rnvc J Base type 20 Ton 2 o I1 BASE BASE . y (D) 21. Crushed surfacing Z,0 ZI Ton 5` )O/ nc::? SURFACING ClassA 22 BST Mile SURFACING . , 23. ACP/PCC I q95- Ton 210T ?31 ,90b 24. Channel & Ditch Exc. ? O CV /eo 25. a) Culvert & Drain Pipe, Installed ?aN.=a-.t .Iiv? Z I CJ Lf. 7 " (E) a-IC't d seas 1 b) Culvert & Drain Pipe, installed x.-- tv. ISO LL 17 30 DRAINAGE rL4^rt,\ SFaal c) Culvert & Drain Pipe, installed T •us I v ('() Lf ZI °-° 2- 69 0 26, Riprap - . Tan 00 _ S (Do 27. Structures less than 20'long Lf. O n DRAINAGE 28. Other O G C ?j 29. Signs Ea, /, yOl] (F) 30. Striping & Channelintion Mile ZzBc? ZZS AFFIC Signals (Exist. Intersec. w/signals ) 31 C) ln.r • O TR SERVICES . Type 32. Guardrall G ee I. section Lf. , 33 Illumination (%exist Illuminated ) - n Mile TRAFFIC SERVICES . . 34. Other ?? ?_ (p Z 35. Sidewalks, ft, wide ?•? SV (G) 36, Bike paths/tralls Mlle ROADSIDE 37. rencing TYpe Lt I>S 9Zc7 [? DEVELOPMENT , 38. Erosion Control U . L.S DSIDE 39, Land scaping d . Acre r7 ROA DEVELOPMENT 40. Other NOTES _ ronra taoese 00T I-, t tpe - SUBTOTAL I J 3 Iy? ?f (H) + Design Engineering at 10% Z' +Construction Engineering at 1S% GRANDTOTAL 7 , I ' ?/ '-? '??o?, = 85 sv , !e[? T? v?-a•,al bias-_' ? c?, Z? _ /pL, uq, 3 x 3000 q I 53,333y`n>I, Z z7 ocSa; - 8814.b7'T,G,avol baste ;?'2 7 x s z so) z1 - I _ I ?Dti,53 ?,' Gcgvml Sr+c?'a<`,??cj Z o00 13 I _ - O.U,c<;n,wdn C\r,SF Aq 1 41} - :1 Z.? / o v r? Iy?f - ?-----?_r ?sL 5,3 •/ _._=_ .. __??,. I Ion to _•2.000 Z(o.? Z.1 ?-.•LO '?_. F'?SSV rfv7 T, Gccwa_-- ? 17c`,5 ' SZ_!°, _?Zln,'?S?c.z?SZfiQ= YO?,?1,49.1' x3o0o /55/,7' • Z' - Z.? L.000 ?--_`:?T?,.?QV4.? S_..?tS6c°hol i ?etl!??"?.A4,eo^"ii$eSAY??+r?,.?.4?i?u?zWC A -mod asphalt calculations asphalt calculations asphalt calculations asphalt calculations 1 a C 3 50 C 3z-? 5280_ a - !L ? , -°- •/ ? f ,, o?o ?rav_I Z- 3[a AS X SZ$U - 705'x. ? SN3 X 3ce0= 18,1 GO?J G1, F3C>cavoi gq ?_-7Z? _ 3b.05 _ I G'7 33;35 (Oi?)SzB0? - Z i3o?'_ 36 Tx3ooo_ - 195C?. Gcavel s r?ac .5 53r Z7 zooo I 1 h asphalt calculations asphalt calculations --tOrJ ? LaN?. ? `? a0):y3T6 - S,33yc 141" r t '4- - 1`/kNl• I 07?aO C,y?sni. - 3 G9, ov, ?x ?'CUYW t :.? A7 ff C.. ? ?x,?\c4t1: G.??, ' rs"f_-Z L?,7 x 1? SZ o_]=z7 5Lzfc,? X3poC .x2c?cn?.??31T. a t 0 Z-q,0' L f?Ly ISX i?52£i?=27e 9564 ? f ?9Sf?4,? x3opQ?-ZOVa? 143 T,. R ,- 150 ! ;.t?'x 12"pl,.?,? Gc?.c, r?..l. I\- c• GvlV, HP 'L ?? p;?+a 4s.d1. ta.clC? 1os` zti= A. ex ?ta•?o L Sw/Yl zzy° P '? ' i t$ 1?foD ?C,, S?ao\ C.nn?V. Sc?. CaRW61?, 4'a. Y.,.A.1, ? (r?10.gOG? '75?? ?s1e,Gn?\ae?s t? GJS-'-, 37S`_ u x!`,. yv&aA woe- 1 J ?- " zq 9?c. t=X cod 9? iris/cy. `d??k?: ?_ ?ft5 ? Z'-a??. TcaaLvnaw'l. (Jla i i. I? . . I 1 i 1 ?_1 rn N N O M i r u j I ? 0 a , b ? ` o m eT l N DO Q` I O Q' 1 1 LYE 0 o I N J U 4 a a w 4 a E 4 ? t f) n Q o I o n p o tl x I + t 7 O O n Ln i I? ?I Ul N O O 1? U U N -J ro 4-J 4J I ro E E . N E ' 0 4; ,A ' w w ? - N N N 4.) 0 0 H H j r j k N N r'I NI n ro co ,- m n E r $4 sa N N U U W W O O ?I y W W Or ' tP N N w O w. U 41 4 N N U U H a w J ??, REPLACEMENT CONS ('RUCTION COSTS { i, CATEGORYC? DU -G? C7 4'' ?1 '3 s` a t v s1r i s IDENTIFICATION Z., ?t...r ?]' ,trM .ant n,?.?s tar spa t ? ?'? tX. ° s a.2 Road Nam 3 .• 1 1•?>;. ?i? ?P'tt 's"'tiy C ``? ti a rr ,?, 3. County "lo-, sir c Utz -4,, Route Number y. +S.rMP., .•v toMP,' •`r`>w?, 6. Length E:= Mi. 1 ) _ { i i REPLACEMENT COST ESTIMATE Task Activity ' Amount Unit Unit Cost Extension Total In Dollars (A) 19, Land Acquisition & Relocation Assistance 3i 6 Acre Z.006 77- RIGHT OF WAY IS. Utility Relocation (Describe under NOTES below) C7) L.S. 1::1 ROW z (g) 16. Clearing & Grubbing (' o Acre _'P • GRADING 17. Roadway Exc., incl. Haul Z ?U CY 5 I2 _ Incl. Haul Borrow 18 0 CY // GRADING , . 19. Other O d ?,, (C) SE 1 Z r 20. Base type C,?a,sS C9-?-P?v 4I ,'?Cl 6 Ton 06 BASE BA 9zS (D)J 21. Crushed surfacing 1_ Ton 5 `I17C? SURFACING ClassA 22. BST Mile yL SURFACING ` , 23. ACP)PCC Ton ,_ 0 -7. 1.5 01i 24. Channel & Ditch Exc. 0 CY o a >. N U 25, a) Culvert & Drain Pipe, installec Hng-.c, tv (1-2, Lf. I Op 24 L b) Culvert & Drain Pipe, Installed x-c„su In C-) LL )•, Z? DRAINAGE a-zvTn l , 44-1 c) Culvert & Drain Pipe, Installed -r„1" 17_h Lt. 11 ?_5 Z0 26. Riprap Z.OO Ton 27. Structures less than 20' long r:> Lf, ?Z C DRAINAGE 28. Other I n I F 29. Signs ? Ea. Oe uh- oo 2.0 (p) 30. Striping & Channelintion (7 Mile CID _ (f) TRAFFIC 31. Signals (Exist. Intersec, w)signals ) ('? Inti er; d SERVICES 32. Guardnll,Type 0 o LL ?_500 33. Illumination (% exist. Illuminated ) ?'1 Mlle TRAFFIC SERVICES 34. Other i' _ r1 r1 /_ O 35. Sidewalks, ft. wide C'7 SY ?•, C) _ (G) 36. Bike paths/trails n Mlle (:7) ROADSIDE 37. Fencint, Type -= Ll.:) I r4.. r. QY Lf. 11S ??c ?J._U DEVELOPMENT 38. Erosion Control L.S. 39. Landnapint Acm ROADSIDE DEVELOPMENT 40. Other 2 0 C' j' 1 I SUBTOTAL ?$ p (H) ?. t Design Engineering at 10% EL • Construction Engineering at 15% La.LLYcJpil U? • f r GRAND TOTAL ) N f! I of NOTES DOT FOAM 140.011 11 n { ?T m ? nm'f 1?4'. tfi ?+,? ? 5 ?XF?CF .r"h rlY i ? t ? ;N 11'. •„n++W n'^R.W'f'4} RR'n •J,.,..n•c'MS?w. wH 1>?Y?r?.yLifi•1,.'[ r? i„F,a,rrYii/? f ( ! I C L ?T1 { ? ? (" , {- , v., ?. . ..._ ? n . , I y IDENTIFICATION r ... _... 4...-....9 v > a r ? ?• n r7 ?, r i 2R0dNdmen. „1'a'' ?lUt. rar c,. t ? Y a tYs t` ^, r C. - a (I aj 3. County •?;4. Route.Number '5 MP.,?: r to MP." ?- '•'r+', r' i I 6. Length REPLACEMENT CONS I"RUCTION COSTS 1 ce'rFrnovl 2 i?rn? -r- ? ., 11 ??` 7-] ?- -. sl Aa (Ijt N sa ( .. ?wf .: 'EXISTING. GEOM ETRICS r W s 4 !+ µ r i7 _P 4r ' x ? r ?? Ira ? r? l1 I r' c y avement {ype Uglmproved Gravel BST ? r ACP/PCC ?, a t^' ti +' k t - t t s 8 R6#4?Iwa??Idt1Y, l lFi feet 'C7 '1 ? > u- 9 Terrain slevel6 Rolling O. Mountalrious ? '` 1 r ? ""' _- N ru r. t ..s;r Nr ` t + 4 air e ofth lanes Z A r 1J.' ADT ? _ V !J, ,,.,.?•' 7..,. Av Right,of Way width. it r }"a _ (3 Qikglah ;j+/es ? No REPLACEMENT COST ESTIMATE Task Activity Amount Unit Unit Cost Extension Total In Dollars (A) RIGHT OF WAY 14. Land Acquisition 6 Relocation Assistance Acre y0 ZO ?(D C.( 15. Utility Relocation (Desc ib d . RO W r e un er NOTES below ) LS. ? n _ _ 3 ?L,b (a) 16. Clearing 6 Grubbing $• ?? Acre 7-000 ) • GRADING 17. Roadway Exc., Incl. Haul ?'- CY I ?? 31 y , 18. Borrow, Incl. Haul h CY O 19. Other ? O GRADING (G) { z , L to O BASE 20. Base type (-.rc\,V q_ L Ton G°O ? 9ZQ , . BASE (D) 21. Crushed surfacing 1 y y Ton SURFACING 22. BST, Class A Mlle = 23. ACP/PCC Ton -.NG 24. Channel & Ditch Exc. ? CY N•IL ??14?k c.nK. 2S, a) Culvert 6 Drain Pipe, installed e.t n,,,,,. core, may. e-? Lf o? r O. 4, b) Culvert & Drain Pipe, installed * craw, 36 ( Lt. 1 -7 O DRAINAGE 2- sv"Tr, r S*.a r e) Culvert & Drain Pipe, instilled ?.. tom. U Lt. Z (- LS Z U 26. Ripnp ISb Ton (Soo 2. 'L .S? 27. Structures less than 20' long Lf. / DRAINAGE 28, Other ) I ? 29. Signs Ea. (F) 30, Striping 6 Channeltratlon Mile 0 TRAFFIC 31. Signals (Exist. intersec. ./signals Inter• section Q d SERVICES • 32, Guardrail,Typa _ Lf. 33. Illumination (% exist. Illuminated ) y Mile TRAFFIC 3 4. Other •SERVICES 1 to :' 35. Sidewalks, ft, wide SY (G) 36. Bike paths/trails Mile _ i ROADSIDE 37. Fencing, Type 1t? I r d. 1, n Lf. I S ?9 ?,c? DEVELOPMENT 38. Erosion Control L S CD 39. Landscaping . . Acre D ? ROADSIDE 40. Other DEVELOPMENT SUBTOTAL F ? • p (H) + Design Engineering at 10% T 71 +Construetion Engineering at IS% E=E ig NOTES GRANDTOTALL?( ti ronr4 t.o•eaa on r ??{y , lief/( ??n'.' if Zl??r'!Dn+nw*+?ra^i cl ?? '??9??' l1 T k,1 >ni? fr''??F'1?T Y?, KULACEMCrvl CONSi RUGI IUN COSTS F -UIUO- L CATEGORY?? Zµl # s ?P .N r r IDENTIFICATION 2' RaddlJdme 1 J < ? ) aX sr a ,,t .,,,? ?, J sF IX t sN x r t' r +, !r a 3. County FT ;4. out. Number . 5 MP.,. 'mss toMP 6. Length L ?--, MI. .{ `J r ? EX(STINC GEOMETRICS 1 ? Lis wN s;.is M r.t.r< yr{ o• fi . '+ h s7 Pavement { pe 1 - r q Tproved ?TGravel SST O ACP/PCC? Q, a 8 yRoTd? a)^? tdtft r 7e' .feet r :. ,dl? 9 •Terraln sLevel ?{ Rolling? Moun[amouz? s i ;•. t rtes , a 1,0 ,No a ru lanes i M1 n r 1J. ADT t ry Ys? ;_ )2. Ave Rrght o(Wayµwrdth 1 ??'y ft Y ,13 J§tk4lane; V sr? No (? REPLACEMENT COST ESTIMATE Task Activity Amount Unit Unit Cost Extension Total In Dollars (A) RIGHT OF WAY 14.Land Arjulsition & Relocation Assistance 0 Acre O ROW 15. Utility Relocation (Describe under NOTES below) L.S. c7 (8) - 16. Clearing & Grubbing N .3?J Acre ZQQO ? GRADING 17. Roadway Exc., Ind. Haul ??oy CY JAS ( 3,2 18. sorrow, Incl. Haul CY © 19. Other GRADING (C) BASE 20. Base type 7 6 I Ton M .ASE (D) 21. Crushed surfacing Ton 5 9-9 7 / 7 0 SURFACING •22. 85T, ClassA 7 Mlle Q 0 23 ACP/PCC SURFACING . Ton 0 0 , _ 7 7 • 24. Channel & Ditch Exc. Pl •, ? Q Cy 4 °-u 17 (? C ?? r, 2 n,w c,,v.? 25. a) Culvert & Drain Pipe, Installed Y•+•µoo., u,l v. I Z L.0 LL 7 e f . ---- Z b) Culvert & Drain Pipe, installed L Lf. 1 -7 3b (O 0 DRAINAGE r-zv"T'r, l s4wr C) Culvert & Drain Pipe, installed'- nstalled ('o Lt Z) Win. (Z 40 G 26. Rlprap ( . Ton pO I OCR • 21., Structures less than 20' long LJ Lf d CJ DR N 28. Other , AI AGE O 29. Signs Ea. (F) 30, Striping & Channeliaatlon Mite U TRAFFIC 31, Signals (Exist. Intersec, w/signals ) C> Inter- SERVICES 32. Guardrail,Type 1 SCr? section Lf. oc? 10 -• (SOU. 33. IIIuminuion (%exlst. Illuminued ) _ CD Mile TRAFFIC SERVICES 34. Other U 3S. Sidewalks, ft.wide © SY 0 G (G) 36, Bike paths/trails Mile C-7) t? ROADSIDE 37. Fencing,TYpe 17 t.- L-) lV' d-. r'z• (? ? Lf. 2_$ Z D DEVELOPMENT 38. Erosion Control U I S _ 0 39. LaMsaping . . Acre Q C7 ROADSIDE DE 40, Other e-s VELOPMENT I r s ) r 4 r.lc J r- I r REPLACEMENT COST ESTIMATE Task Activity Amount Unit Unit Cost Extension Total In Dolian (A) RIGHT OF WAY 14•Land Acquisition & Relocation Assistance 17? Acre ' v 15. Utility Relocation (Describe under NOTES below) r -:j L.S. ROW (8) , 16. Clearing & Grubbing //II? Acre C1?10 • GRADING 17. Roadway Exc., Incl. Haul -6,500 CY 18. Borrow, Incl. Haul eD CY d O 19. Other _ C.7 f7 GRADING (C) BASE 1Y r. 20. Base type _Gl Q s5 R l t-r.v d 1 7 9 61 Ton BASE 92 - (D) 21. Crushed surfacing 14 ?14 Ton I Z U SURFACING •22. BST, ClassA Z'$Ms??-S _?? Mile 171; 2& ?Z SURFACING 23. ACP/PCC Ton _ h 24. Channel & Ditch Exc. CY 25. a) Culvert & Drain Pipe, installed 105 Lf. -7 b) Culvert & Drain Pipe, Installed A - cu tv. I O LL I I '3 CJ V . DRAINAGE c) Culvert & Drain Pipe, installed yyz Tn ?•tvtans (o D Lr ZI- . 12100 26. Riprap . Ton 1 !7E? 27. Structures less than 20' long C) Lt '?D DRAINAGE 28. Other Q . p r? Z I 29. Signs Ea. (F) 30, Striping & Channcllzation ( Mile U TRAFFIC 31. Signals (Exist. Intcrsec. w/signals Intcr• SERVICES 32. Guardrail,Type IS(7 section Lf. U 33. Illumination (% exist. illuminated ) Mile a TRAFFIC SE 34. Other GZ? 5 • RVICES ? l l 35. Sidewalks, h. wide r> SY C7 U (G) 36. Bike paths/trails r, Mlle C7. ROADSIDE 37. Fencing, Type 77- wdir d. BLS'. LL Z U DEVELOPMENT 38. Erosion Control L S _ 0 39. Landscaping . . Acre ._ ROADSIDE DEVELOPM 40. Other ENT F i { ,a 7 s KCYLAL.CMCIV LUNbI KUGTION COSTS 1, CATEGORY E -O' ;- M4 ° ./v I. 91tr 1. s IDENTIFICATION , L - % $ ?QO dName ^l'i ty", rr ?sra fir.. i 1 t I#. a rf f r 7, n_ u - t tr 1. ti s '% 3. County ?SC?LSat-gr:7t?. S:,• Route Number to MP 6. Length 41 t ?t?r? 1° /?1 xY 77 `EXISTING GEGM CTRICS .1 r ?Y? C? 'stFx4rrrt?> tv 7:n? Ni- ! !C 1 s7 .Pavement IYOe Uglfpproved ?LGnvel Bsr'ACPJPCC ? i a jd v r F Ro GidtE feet 7 x 9 Ternln sLevelQ Rollin r - / 11{ t r 8s Mounnfnous ? - z z / No, o tnru lanes €E( 1 11 ADT_ 1! c: 1„ ?•i, ,, 12• •Ave Right of Way width h: r r+w•.::13 ljikfi?ahesl?'es ?. No •• 61 REPLACEMENT COST ESTIMATE Task Activity Amount Unit Unit Cost Extension Total in Dollars (A) RIGHT OF WAY 14•Land Acquisition & Relocation Assistance Acre 0 IS. Utility Relocation (Describe under NOTES below) L.S. ROW (B) . 16. Clearing•& Grubbing ,5• ?? Acre • GRADING 17. Roadway Exc., Incl. Haul Z9, 3? CY IBS l ?S 18. Borrow, Incl. Haul • 0 CY 19. Other GRADING (C) BASE ) zrr 20. Base type -!LLA5! hJ GMyh ( 7/ 6 Ton OU G 9Z. - BASE / 9Z (D) 21. Crushed surfacing 1'43'1 ' Ton 5 eo ' / -7 p SURFACING 22. BST, Class A /3•J C."'. ?-' Mile ?/() ?L °? 2 23'. ACP/PCC Ton 1 SURFACING • 24. Channel & Ditch Exc. (o o CY µ,°-° Z t((? ;a•a x" Pt L cans 2S. a) Culvert & Drain Pipe, installed 2.1. Ar,G,i•r 7-10 Lf. `7 O p ( q-70 (E) b-15"T- f S f-( b) Culvert &Dnin Pipe, (nstalied 7.•c.u t./, ' 2 '? ^ LL 1-7 e' Q / Z DRAINAGE zu Tr• 1•Sieat e) Culver[ &Dnin Pipe, Installed x Gu h/ . (° 0 Lf )Z(O? 26. Riprap _ 1 00 . Ton ??? 15b o 27. Structures less than 20' long U Lf (L> Q DRAINAGE 28. Other (? . O 0 r 29. Signs Ea. ?? Z(?? (F) 30. StrlPing&Channelization Mlle I loot Irv TRAFFIC 31, Signals (Exist. Intersec. w/signals ) G> Inicr• SERVICES 32. Guardrail,Type !•'-L] section Lf, ?0° 15h0 , 33. Illumination (%exist. illuminated ) Mlle 0 C'> TRAFFIC 34. Other _ - p v .SERVICES 35. Sidewalks, ft. wide SY (G) 36, Bike paths/trills s (•-; Mile n ROADSIDE '•r 37. Fendng,TYPe_dl W srC.. - Z (> LL DEVELOPMENT 38, Erosion Control L:) - L S ? 39. Landscaping . . . Aere ROADSIDE DEVE 40. Other ?_ /'? LOPMENT , OK v? 2' RziFd Namea^ -s ,4: Route Number -ATEGORY 2 -v 1 ocl Fl Cap) ', l a t "try 3. County -S 7 6. Length r Mi. F ss s Ji - ? la s n;, wT ' '' ; .EXISTING GEOf1ETRICS. [ r?.i r 1 ,.,i^"\' z-s.+' ; G vr+ / i. ? t7 Pavement tYDe UgIIPProved ? Gravet?? OST ? ACPIPCC ? i ' s rc e- 8 Ro wa wld[h.^ r ?( 'h feet r??I:?iI ? s 9 Terrain sLevel 6 Rolling ?JS1oun[ainous ? ; 1,Oz iNo oFthru lanes T? 1, s r us c..i `y ) Hl )2. Ave 1: ADT Right o! Waw y4rdlh "?_ h. r >r 13 J§ikf,?ane;;j ?es ? No? ' C. t • REPLACEMENT COST ESTIMATE Task Activity Amount Unit Unit Cost Extension Total In Dollars (A) Y W 14.Land Acquisition & Relocation Assistance d Acre C., RIGHT OF A 15. Utility Relocation (Describe under NOTES below) LS. C) ROW 7-7 ?? (B) 16. Clearing & Grubbing L/ Acre Z V ?ZU GRADING 17. Roadway Exc., incl. Haul CY 1 S (I?' ZL ' 18. Borrow, Incl. Haul d CY , GRADING 19. Other Q 1 (G) 20. Base type C-\ 22 G ,e 24 k °I bL Ton Z:20- 15 F12g BASE BASE 92E? (D) 21. Crushed surfacing ) 3 `' Ton 5 Go 7/70 SURFACING 22. BST ClassA C? Mile U (f) SURFACING , 23. ACP/PCC i 4O? •/ Ton Zd? 24. Channel & Ditch Exc. CY 1 Zy IL??`Ar w\LV ,C 25. a) Culvert & Drain Pipe, installed s-a++-. LL Uo _?_ (E) b) Culvert & Drain Pipe, Installed ICS GU 6,• 111 0 Lf. -LZ= ,0(00 DRAINAGE tN° Tr. r SMe? C) Culvert & Drain Pipe, installed <- errw (nU LL ?.\ o-w- I Z (OD 26. RIDraD `?0 Ton Ise" 7.'5-0 27.. Structures less than 20' long Lf C?p C> DRAINAGE 28. Other d . C? D Z 5 29. Signs Ea, y0'? 7-0 CD (F) 30. Striping & Channellzation Mile \ 1U?- ( ( 0 TRAFFIC 31. Signals (Exist. Intersec. ./signals ) b Inter- i p p SERVICES 32. Guardrail,Ty De •---L?E.:'T"• see l on Lf. -- I Too , 33. Illumination (%exist. illuminated ) t--? Mile 0 TRAFFIC •. SERVICES j 34. Other CID 0 I F 7 3S. Sidewalks, ft. wide C? SY C.a y (G) 36. Bike paths/trails mile Q ROADSIDE 37. Fencing,Type 7ifrn.Tl wrrz_ _:, Lf. DEVELOPMENT 38. Erosion Control C' L S U 39. Landscaping O . . Acre G ROADSIDE DEVELOPMENT 40. Other 0 i"? ?) Z REPLACEMENT CONS (RUCTION COSTS s 'grltif IDENTIFICATION , r c r?JYT?" sC ;?r7 v 'q r i to P k i M mi 9 ?knr^? r•1? }a 2 i '? " )V Road Nd de 3 ?-ta r 4: Route Numi; -(.i•Sif ?ti'.r,y.r''' EXISTING (',EOMETRICS t r l ° .ri t' {'c ?4 s,'? ' ti r . H . . ?. f y f y 7 Pavement ty?e;=UglrJtProved ? Gravel ? BST ? ACP/P p r CC ? ,? `t ? V9 idt7as t.A{ f t 8 Road 1 'vA+ ?' '. ?. b•tt •+aL l e . ?p n Yt ""7T47°c y, c r / - " ir 9 : Terrain Level ?IRollin ounralnouS s B ? ? ? ;Y) ? tt O aNo o th u lanei Ali ? 1 r Z ? ?..^r t •' 'f's v M ' Ysr rNF 4-r 4,atq„c,. 1 1 S ? j , r F j '? ( h T 3L/ CJ r S ) ' c ;? ? y } w ,? ? _ r? ? '.; , III' A .`ti U >« IO(?, ?.. 4.., {.t ?• i+ t : yy. ,?? { C Y7Y :.A, e. RiBhtof Way rdth Coll ,,,ft !r,; r tirr , .1, 3. ?(ke,lane?;64es ??No (1 REPLACEMENT CONS (RUCTION COSTS 7. CATEGORY P- ' 100 H (2? sIDENTIFICATION. rf - '-- FFy L"? va l 1 *'` 3. County IZGTl'4YS CY^- 7-1 5.: 6. Length== ML b - i l 3 REPLACEM cNT COST ESTIMATE Task Activity Amount Unit unit Cost Extension Dollars (A) RIGHT OF WAY 19.Land Acquisition & Relocation Assistance Acre . 15. Utility Relocation (Describe under NOTES below) U L.S. ROW (B) 16. Clearing & Grubbing Acre 26100 t.( V IV GRADING 17. Roadway Exc., Incl. Haul - rb o 60 ' CY _ 1 >y a S11 7'7 • 18. Borrow, ir3cl. Haul CY c::) O GRADING 19. Other _ y Q s SE 20. Basetype LIASS ??G•rt'QV0iSG -964 Ton z- BASE BA (D) 21. Crushed surfacing l y3a'{ Ton 5e 7) 7 Q> SURFACING 22. BST, ClassA Mile O 147 SURFACING '- 23. ACP/PCC C)ctbS t- 14G, '2 14O$^ Ton -'Q •f P .5 24. Channel & Ditch Exc. loo CY 25. a) Culvert & Drain Pipe, installed ". ?!.a, cWy -Z lo 7 1 y 7 V (E) G-tS"7n,rl fact b) Culvert & Drain Pipe, Installed x • ( ?c (o O LL oa 1? 17-0 DRAINAGE c) Culver[ & Drain Pipe, Installetd D x <urv, yVa k) Lr. Z1 pO to O Z 26. Riprap 100 Ton 15--' \SnO . 27. Structures less than 20' long C? Lf DRAINAGE 28• Other , O (F) 29. Signs h. Striping & Channellaatlon ( Ea. Mile 140 UU.L2 U 110 TRAFFIC 31. Signals (Exist, Intencc. ./signals ) section U SERVICES 32. Guardrail, Type__ - Lf. 33. Illumination (% exist. illuminated c. O Mlle TRAFFIC SERVICES 34. Other 35, Sidewalks, C ft. wide e':, SY (j `' )Q_t! Lam! (G) 36, Bike paths/tolls' G Mlle O y ROADSIDE 37. Fencing,Type T?Pi Z LO*- ?w?r.• "2.°?O Lf. _ I c(?? q .? DEVELOPMENT 38. Erosion Control U L S ? O 39. Landscaping C+ . . Acre - e.1 O ROADSIDE DEVELOPMENT 40. Omer G Lq.L,y U REPLACEMENT CONSTRUCTION COSTS 1. CATEGORY R-a`J00 828 ,, a 1L Yir 1. - IDENTIFICATION s .-.? •-"''; 7 r- . 2 Road Name •'t r*Jt}v?`? `?`'? ?J? J rr Y r s. • I .J }?C 3. County n_ 't'CC?t1 4.?• Route Number .S, h1P.?• n .'. t to MP," f e•-•' 6. Length f _r „?s. ar 4 at: v vx7 EXISTINGi GEOMETRICS f_ w.{ 4e" s ?yrfK. +7 Pavement type UglmpravedGravel ? BST ? ACP/PCC ? ? s r y Y Y.t r+ •?• ! d r. ' •` 9:. Terrain `Level ? Ro11Ing ? Mounta(nous ? (;' r n q ' a U 'Roo?owa width . „ (cet r it ( . ..?., r :.., s.r r a°c"vr.•!^ 7.. r -4 rh N Jthru lanes: ?_ 17r: ADT .,v?T?r'J ?.,;...a r f ?: r_ ,i F i ..s y 'r;,n •r[ 13'? ika ane^ r v -t ..•. w:: 12. Ave R16ht of Way width ?.•h ?av,• .. ?._,4 /!?'es? No?"•I REPLACEMENT COST ESTIMATE Task Activity Amount UN[ Unit Cost Extension Total in Dollars (A) RIGHT OF WAY 14.Land Acquisition & Relocation Assistance v Acre C) ' ROW 15. Utility Relocation (Describe under NOTES below) L.S. 2 _ ? ) \ (B) 16. Clearing & Grubbing Acre e. 17 ) Z.(7 GRADING 17. Roadway Exc., Ind. Haul CY ) 75 S S 1 Z2 • 18. Borrow, Ind. Haul l CY NG 19. Other •? _ ?_ GRADI / ?j 3 3 9 J (C) BASE IZ,r 20. BasetYpe -C_-SOS=y ?,' 37 Ton BASE (D) 21. Crushed surfacing ?O too) Ton 2 'j „ 3 y5 SURFACING 22. BST, CIassA 2 S1w4s '? Mile )p L41 1 '514 1 23. ACP/PCC f _ Ton _ _ SURFACING . 24. Channel & Ditch Exc. _?O(J CY 4!aE Z Cf Q 25. a) Culvert & Drain Pipe, Installed !=1. w ) Z. (6 Lf. = IkO b) Culvert & Drain Pipe, Installed n-auly, P,(nC? Lf /O) ZU DRAINAGE t'eq"%nls`<<I e)Culvert&Dnin Pipe, installed X-Lulu. ?zU . Lf ?) O 757n 26, Riprap 20 (7 . Ton ) o ? x,00 0 27. Structures less than 20' long Lf. DRAINAGE 28. Other !^? /O 29. Signs '5 Ea. L Opp ZO O (F) 30. Striping &Channeliaation Mile TRAFFIC 31. Signals (Exist. Intersee. ./signals ) 0 Inter O d SERVICES 32. Guardnil,TYpe c /? ) S D section Lt. IU°= J SOO 33. Illumination (%exBt. illuminated ) Mlle O a TRAFFIC SE 34. Other _ (7 • RVICES 35. Sidewalks, ft. wide SY D (G) 36. Bike paths/trails ---•-?- Mlle ? OCR ROADSIDE 37. Fencing,TYpe -;?r Uk ft-& - Sz?,Q Lf. ? 7 S ' p t ?ZQ DEVELOPMENT 38. Erosion Control (J L S _ O . 39. Landscaping . . Acre D ROADSIDE EVELOPMEN 40. Other T F' k1 Irv I ..... -,.- . REPLACEMENT CONSTRUCTION COSTS ?-- 1.CATEGORY I2--D?/00&?ZSt. ) REPLACEMENT COST ESTIMATE Ta:k r Activity Amount Unit Unit Cost Extension Total in Dollars (A) HT OF WAY l9•Land Acquisition & Relocation Assistance Acre Q O 1S. Utility Relocation (Describe under NOTES below) LS. _ ROW (g) 16. Clearing AGrubbing - ?-? •33 Acre 2.OCJ0 IO ?Cc(o 0 GRADING 17. Roadway Exc., Incl. Haub _ IR• CY 7S ? SOG7 =tI 18. Borrow, Incl. Haul - CY O I U 19. Other h ?- O GRADING 1 (?) BASE 12,r 20. Base type GI N x-r.va 1 l 3 Ton oo z - 1 Z7 BASE (D) 21. Crushed surfacing I (O j0 q! Ton SURFACING 22. BST, ClassA L ",k44S Mile 131L11 2314 23 ACP/PCC . SURFACING . Ton :Z 24. Channel & Ditch Exc. 140 CY ,l/ Lit `ono ? /(00 Q.ta" Ple'd,, ? 25. a) Culvert & Drain Pipe, installed n+. p.,,,,.-m.lv 14 9, I LL ? =0 1 7 (O (E) (?-rfYnls+aat b) Culvert & Drain Pipe, installed - c., rw - `1•T + b Lf. -( ou 7 (fl 17 [? DRAINAGE a .A b aa 2 c) Culvert & Drain Pipe, installed x- u,lv I Z 0 Lf Z 1 ?0 1 S Z(7 16. Riprap . Ton 7 7 Sn 27. Structures less than 20' long Lf _ DR IN 28. Other . A AGE 29. Signs J Ea. (F) 30. Striping A Channeliaation Mile ? I 1 O TRAFFIC 31. Signals (Exist. intersec. w/signals ) p Int _L SERVICES 32. Guardrail, Type 1 w l. section Lf. - 10?" 154to 33. Illumination (% exist. illuminated Mile O TRAFFIC 34. Other ?•] U SERVICES 35. Sldewalks, ft. wide SY t? (G) 36. Bike paths/trails Mile ? f?GO ROADSIDE 37. Fencing, Type Z,- SOOk -a- SzRO Lg. • 1 25- '71 Ze(() DEVELOPMENT 38. Erosion Control L.S. O n 39. Landscaping Acre ROADSIDE DEVELOP161EN . Other 7 ? .-. _ f Pk( I t - T - f REPLACEMENT CONSI•RUCTION COSTS 7 I } t ry, ?, i r IDENTIFICATION - - ,f 4 n v r51lr _ !• 2 RaadNameJ lye 't/V\l L.°}??,"\J? 1 1 P, •, r , r 3. County ??+-•?ac-?o t^- a 4.,Route Number '.5M11P,.•? to MP wa 6. Length [== Mt. 1. CATEGORY ' REPLACEMENT COST ESTIMATE Task Activity Amount Unit Unit Cast Extension Total In Dollars (A) RIGHT OF WAY 14•Land Acquisition & Relocation Assistance © Acre C ? \ ROW 15. Utility Relocation (Describe under NOTES below) L.S. ) (B) 16. Clearing & Grubbing yy --?? Acre h0 77_ R D • • GRADING' 17. Roadway Exc., incl. Haul CY (7S I(?-?? 18. Borrow, Incl. Haul r CY U G7 19. Other _ (•'? Q C7 GRADING C ( ) BASE 1l 20. Base type C) Ca '5 s-ciy a Ton BASE (D) 21. Crushed surfacing LILA Ton Jr ?°?o g{ ? SURFACING 22. BST, ClassA `L-5444-- Mile 13(N) . I INO) 23. ACP/PCC Ton _? P7 SURFACING Z F (4 ? 4. • 24. Channel & Ditch Exc. _ L4 0 CY • / OP /610 - t7•i-?,6. crna 25. a)Culvert&Drain Pipe,installed IPo.t.a-,...,•„tv. ?1O Lf. '72- ° 1(410 (E) 4-/8 •'T.r s+a,I b) Culver[ & Drain Pipe, installed ?_ u, t., 7-40 LL I?00 4'O I. DRAINAGE I-Ly°17.1 swat c) Culvert & Drain Pip., Installed x - au W CC ? Lf. ? I Z (e 0 26. Riprap )ou Ton Imo}"'. _?S?C.? .- • 27. Structures less than 20' long Lf U DRAINAGE 28. Omer a -D . O O y? O 29. Signs ?S Ea. gyp=- ZOO (F) 30. Striping& Channeliaatlon Mile TRAFFIC 31. Signals (Exist. Intersec. w/signals ) Inter. Q Q SERVICES • 32. Guardrail,Type 0 Section Lf. 33. Illumination(%exist. illuminated ) 0 Mile Q Q TRAFFIC •SERVICES 34. Other_ p d 35. Sidewalks, ft. wide SY CD d (G) 36. Bike paths/tralls -•--L - Mile -Tcd0 '.?OC-:s i ROADSIDE 37. Fencing, Type. JTtJlyd_ • - 'U LL 1'/7-U0 DEVELOPMENT 38. Erosion Control L S 39. Landscaping . . Acre ROADSIDE DEVELOPMENT 40. Other _ C' 1 4"' i •v i,,• r ( t IDENTIFICATION 2 Road,.Name'?C.*7v1''Y. ?t'`1 ?.?, s ..:5;4 .ry r rr 3. County .4: Route Number 5. MPr,, to MPs r 1r 6. Length Mi. REPLACEMENT CONS I'RUCTION COSTS ?.l ; ' REPLACEMENT COST ESTIMATE Task Activity Amount Unit Unit Cast Extension Total In Dollars (A) RIGHT OF WAY 14. Land Acquisition & Relocation Assistance C- Acre L? ) Cd 1S. Utility Relocation (Describe under NOTES below) LJ LS. C,- ROW Clearing & Grubbing 16. y' L Acre Z-'00 i Z.QC-• 17 R d E H l I l I Z SDO GRADING ' . oa way xc., au nc . 18. Borrow, Incl. Haul . CY CY C> NG 19. Other Q C? U GRADI (c) BASE 20. Bau tYPe C 1a3s 2C2 X-c / cis - 91 ? Ton Z 7. B S A E (D) 21. Crushed surfacing 1(O(0 OI Ton Vva -1'45 SURFACING '22. BST, Class A Mile 23. ACP/PCC _.l I- 43 Ton ZO1?-' ?Zg G Q SURFACING N 0 • 24. Channel & Ditch Exc. 4 0 Cy q °-° Rp Q 25. a) Culvert & Drain Pipe, installed Pa a.,n,-. 210 Lf• b) Culvert & Drain Pipe, Installed X- %,fQ Lt. /1 ? t-.. o sU DRAINAGE c) Culvert & Drain Pipe, Installed x - cul' 26. Ripnp 100 Too ":70 C) 27. Structures less than 20' long Lf y 0 DRAINAGE 28. Omer (7 . d ?-- y 7 29. Signs E.. y. LOO (F) 30. Striping & Channelization ) Mile 1 LQ! ?? TRAFFIC 31. Signals (Exist. Intersec. w/signals ) (?J Inter. section • ?j SERVICES 32. Guardrali,Type ISO L . , 33. Illumination (% exist. Illuminated ) U Mile D TRAFFIC SERVICES j . 34• Other -> Q O 3S. Sidewalks, ft. wide SY (G) 36. Bike paths/trills ? Mile ?Q SODO ROADSIDE 37. Fencing,Type_IT W 1rd. ) ?-n Lf - -7-5 7.':1 n DEVELOPMENT 78. Erosion Control . L S 0 d 39. Landscaping _•[2 . . Acre -_ Q ROADSIDE DEVELOPMENT 40. Other _ -L- D I e, I R ' E. 1.CATEGORY 075Z-E'12L) ?K;,,? REPLACEMENT CONS FRUCTION COSTS tt ?.. I IDENTIFICATION t. ,Road NameC--YY? 3. County \ C.. { . ,... C7 'f .4.I Route Number 5. MPS s toMP;" 6. Length Mi. 1 :; s N wY a.r I EXISTING GEOJMETRICS t {,.;? b 'Jtf Mz r.t °'.. < - _ r ?: ., .y .,; f >.. s ,{ t t 'i r ?' do ? .•? , 7 Pavement'tYPe Ugimprov<d Gra eI Q BST ? ACP/PCC ??i1 r j j . t 8 RoxdwaY Wldth.fcet ?'id r ? r ? 1,0 No Hof thru lanes 9 Terrain ,Level Q Roll,ng Mountainous 11 ADT . ??,(?? }?.y )2. Ave Righ[of Way width:!' ?? ',ft y r y,vvk,.; 1,3'd?ikpJlane>r,S;es? NO REPLACEMENT COST ESTIMATE Task Activity - Amount Unit Unit Cost Extension Total in Dollars ( R ation Assistance & Rel 1 L d A i iti I , Z Acre ` CQ Zg00 ROW IGHT OF WAY 4. an cqu s on oc 15. Utility Relocation (Describe under NOTES below) U L.S. & Grubbin Cl i 16 Acre ZOO C7 / ?, fD?C? (B) g ear ng . incl. Haul Roadway Exc. 17 7 q r3Ul? CY 7 ...L 5175 GRADING , . Haul incl CY GRADING . 18. Borrow, 19. Other ?- (C) 1Z pe <-1 elSS ? C7TO..?/d( Base t 20 DOE Ton z?"'? ry???? --I'- BASE BASE y . ? z 7 q (D) Crushed surfacing 21 zQZ) Ton Sri -s ?V ? - SURFACING . A 2'Sko'?'t' 22 Cl ST ? Mile ?? pp -a 7 1J?LJi5L SURFACING ass . B . 23. ACP/PCC _ d Ton b. b. Channel & Ditch Exc 24 U CY '-L° ?-IO y . . installed w. noor r'.11 ) Culvert & Drain Pipe 25 I L? `S Lf. (E) , . a v,6"Tr.154.0 installed X ? cu to . b) Culvert & Drain Pipe 31,0 Lf. /7°'? tO) Z(] DRAINAGE , z I ?,nl Installed W Tr.-w, e) Culvert & Drain Pipe ) Z 0 Lf ZI moo. 7S Z , 26 Ri ? . Ton X00 :?,n co . prap Structures less than 20' long 27 . Lf Q C_7 DRAINAGE . . 28. Other , b ns Si 29 'S Ea. 4/C7 -zoo g . Striping & Channelizatlon 30 Mile LL Z.?? (F) . w/signals intersee nals (Exist Si 31 l;r In (? Q TRAFFIC SERVICES . . g . Guardrail Type 32 secion t Lf, TRAFFIC i , . illuminated ) (% ist 33 Ill i ti C) Mlle C) SERVICES ex . . um na on 34. Other -L? _-K;> I z ft. wide Sidewalks 35 9?D SY CD (G) , . Bike paths/trails 36 I Mlle S?y SiDa t ROADSIDE . 37. Fenein9,TVP1 77-LS_)'1e Q. QC?) Lf. 7-4'U DEVELOPMENT Erosion Control 38 L S S DE . Landscaping 39 . . Acre C2 ROAD I DEVELOPMENT . 40. Otht U ? C c SUBTOTAL (H) • ? Design Engineering at 10% •?? =L?LhL, ?ConttructlonEngineerin`itIS% ?a•?-1-}?.tbLL. • GRAND TOTAL NOTES C. i T FORM 1.0.021 nn t M?nv..a•,..,.......-.---.._ .,.?,,?aFrr,:m?c-:.7 ., s'K!?7^..'gX?i.:snryrrk.ras.rv'??",;'rant„Lt?,m ,? ? .??5:£r ?x Cd^??1n ti iv •?''"j°P.? ?hy+l?`,}? lam. _ l i r1 cK ?? REPLACEMENT CONSTRUCTION COSTS 1, CATEGORY IZ-O?SU l . s.•_ ?,?`.; / r -'IDENTIFICATION -A .. __ r ?u no n :. a Y 1 _ ?50 V? klV" '? a in=`+ 3 c1 ??a 1 '''ky ? C -' 1 - le . Ir . / + . ounty 2; Road Name; ?^ V "''4. Rout Number MP Io'MP! C.1 6. Length h11. <. ?} 'N 3 YY i ! : EXISTING.GEOM ETRICS i-li rti cps f ra,S?'?ti'rrrY?' )? •P .' r s T4 ?f• r . t er P ?d+ ?,Jk •? 1 c '.t(r4r C ; r y .u r:kw 7, Pav mcnt IYPe Unlrfproved ? Gra el ? BST' ACP/PCC ?t?l?t ? '7i ? v '8Roa wq1•? Idtlssx? feet a ,G?,aff?, JN i fi t t " a "? = ? i L t! -s h lt 3 rs7'` ? ,lv^ `S r 7.?.n.- r i • i k. 11 : 1lr4,_ 1.5 F r s zT le a a."?,n a1107?fo oa(lltru l3nes?•1? i1y c 3>-r,? ?1 '•.r 9. Terrain sLc IQIRolhng lY; Jvlounrainous?. ? ) >. - s t N')'h eyK„r,?1 y r r...,,. ` tis ?7I.??yy1 yr 4 ly r it r r e 1? ,• r f F ^ ? ? ?•No? ? ??;?' 13'fO k?lane>qwe ? ? v? 11: Ri f)[of Wa ?idth ?9 (•J•1' ft ADT ,;• •?5("')'° I,.r,; .?,S.,xw, -. '12 Ave. REPLACEMENT COST ESTIMATE I Total in ! Task Activity Amount Unit unit cost Extension Dollars ( R 14.Land Acquisition & Relocation Assistance r Z- Acre ROW p IGHT OF WAY 15. Utility Relocation (Describe under NOTES below) y L.S. --1:2 B 16. Clearing & Grubbing ?? ??? Acre ZODO ( ) incl Haul Roadway Exc 17 CY 7 GRADING ., . . Haut incl Borrow 18 CY RADING . , . 19. Other n Q (O 7 (C) Base type C 1 QS4 (? 6-1"V a. 20 Ton Z ?o Z ( BASE BASE . 2. 1 9 i (D) Crushed surfacing 21 Z V 2- ( Ton •? o= ( V . _ SURFACING ClassA 22 BST Mile 5 ?SOI Jr7 SURFACING . , 23. ACP/PCC Ton Channel & Ditch Exc. 24 CY ?_ Z[-(U [E . ,z•rs.,.. c.s•. installed ?•ncs.-. ??t v a)Culvert& Drain Pipe 25 Z10 LL ?= 1 L4-) O R A (E ) , . v-tb"Tr•.s ieoi installed ti - us Iv b) Culvert & Drain Pipe 310 (? Lt. o0 DRAINAGE , L-tu"f.. t Slu•s e) Culver) & Drain Pipe, installed a-w1v • . (. ? i Z Lf. en. Z 1 -' Z SZO 26 a Ri 1 ? / ' l v Ton 1 5'-0 ?Z 6V . pr p Structures less than 20' long 27 C') Lf DRAINAGE . 28. Other n • ?_ y =;D Signs 29 Ea. ?(? ?/• /'? __ . Striping & ChanneWation 30 1 Mile (p) . w/signals ) Intersce Si nals (Exist 31 i In c r• U d TRAFFIC RVICES . g . . Guardrail 32 Type sec i o n Lf. _.?Q'? (SdU TRAFFIC SE , . min ted ) i t ill 33 Ill i i U Mlle SERVICES um on ex s . u a . nat • 1 34. Other ?^. 7- wide Sidewalks ft 3S 0 SY ? C7 (G) , . . 36. Bike paths/traits Mile C:) ROADSIDE 37. Fencing,Type 2-110 Lf• _ oRyU DEVELOPMENT Erosion Control 38 S L V CID DSIDE RO . Landsca in 39 . . Acre A DEVELOPMENT p g . 40, Other O \ X trr• •yt, f'. r ID ENT] F IC ATION 2. Road Name? ` V4 YV^i t?+...IN'+° t )s? .1 3. County Ja_?Ta 4. Route Number r sr', .:5.' M11P s to.MP 6. Length Mi. REPLACEMENT CONSTRUCTION COSTS 1. CATEGORYI K-' ?7SV -I',?L3?f?? ? '. <.. /.?% r' i v Y ?? ? EXISTING (lED ETRICS 1-I 14,es y.'' t' 4 i.ftF 4 i%x?'? l'? l.i ? ry.r r , tyil l,n ?i43f F .Mi'. r sr. t •, i n.{ rf a4 a• 7. Pavemenl(ype Uglmp1o?ed?Gravel Cl BSY? ACP PCC?SJterf'r nir? i IiBrRo Qwa Id$tsk ?1"?"(eel ?r rli 1 r I ? ?:tl ?af '.T S^. li ?F1 de !'r l r.A IF s,`?;?lt???r? Y'). 19°, r? i5?t ?. ? 9 T main L vet QI_Rollfng Jriptintalnous ? ) A a ( r'° r a 10J No o?thrullanes;Y + z c'r 1 s t r',AC, rs ?+r0.J+y,? ? 7 Y ? .. ?`r F4/••s t ?r11?}??;'Yls?' ?!°Vi ,r -' +r11. ADT ,,;? 1 .,, .?5; 1. ., .12 Ave ,Right of lyay w_idsh - tt .? fir.. ,v,,,l 13 „?Ikeylane 1V' s,O• No (ek R EPLACEM ENT COST ESTIMATE { Task Activity Amount Unit Unit Cost Extension Total in Dollars (A) 11.1-and Acquisition & Relocation Assistance 1 . Z Acre 2000 za'Oo ROW RIGHT OF WAY 15. Utility Relocation (Describe under NOTES below) r, 7 L.S. U G7 tf U (B) 16. Clearing & Grubbing f5 F7 Acre L0OU ?(0( ' GRADING Ind. Haul 17. Roadway Exc. t0.000 CY j» )-IajOU , :.net. Haul Borrow 18 CD CY O GRADING , . 19. Other d y z (p to O (C) BASE 12" 20. Base type L1C.SS Creo.?c,.t 1b - 992 Ton Z-S-0_ Z? 79, BASE z tl 9 (D) 21. Crushed surfacing 70 Z. 1 Ton SS-- SURFACING SURFACING ClassA bs..1 Gc...v??? 22 . BST ) Mile IS°15'1 IS SURFACING . , 23. ACP/PCC U Ton CD Z (O (? 24. Channel & Ditch Exc. u CY 44 o? ( (a U ra'Pw•..cx installed ? • r7pu,.c.. w 25. a) Culvert & Drain Pipe Z I V LL cr' L 1410 (E) , b) Culvert & Drain Pipe, installed as -- t?• Z y(D Ll. 1-7 *01BO DRAINAGE I • aY"L.l •,ra.l e) Culvert & Drain Pipe, installed a - L... IV (c0 Lf. ZI oo - t Z(& O 26. RiPrap I G U Ton I S°-° 150y 27. Structures less than 20' long C7 Lf O U DRAINAGE 28. Other , Cf 7 Signs 29 Ea. (F) . 30. Striping & Channcliration _ ? Mile ?aod TRAFFIC 31. Signals (Exist.Intersee.w/signals Int i p O SERVICES 32. Guardrail,Type o sect on Lt. ?SOL) TRAFFIC Illumination(%exist illuminated - ) 33 h Mlle •. SERVICES . . 34. Other C> Z z 35. Sidewalks, ft. wide SY (G) 36. Bike paths/ttalls Mile SOU S06U ROADSIDE 37. Fencing,Type 52 Lf. ?( z.`•?CJ DEVELOPMENT 38. Erosion Control U L.S. DSIDE O 39. Landscaping U Acre U U R A DEVELOPMENT 40, Other () f t _. ? CONS-FRUM ION COSTS { 1, CATEGORYI 'k-C ?50"/1 (3??? r'IDENTIFICATION i n ) a I .:2 RoaJ Name 's '! P"? ti r 3. Count y ! a •'4. Route he r C., a:A1P ., to MP uc: Is?'? 6. Length MI. - EX(STING.GEO?ETRICS ?yx gig r - _'?7 Pavement lYpe Ugfmpro dOGravel? BST I?ACP?PCC?y) tv w R aF s ?p = ??? . s r M. a7 t ti! ti• tt• ?. rLar e < 8 rRoadwa wldl}rs 'QI leer D''r.l t 7 i s -s. t Y .("s i s y. ,.nay ? -- I 9 Terrain ;Le el Q-rtolling.,Mquntainous? k ) Tn rv? r t + 1r t t > 7r}T^` < °.+ >` ! '1 ??, r-r<,??. + 4'rywj+y,..u? 7 'r f:.?r al T?i??'?l J.t ryti}It?iru'Jlanesyls SL- t? -,r ?nJ„ ?f ..'1 i' AOT' ..'%• .=?}, H -= •72 Ave •;Right of Way;w.idih?ft 's `,'"r h iK+yi-7ra•k !! I t ?7• ,r 73 Aike lane?l No k REPLACEMENT COST ESTIMATE - Task Activity Amount Unit Unit Cost Extension Total in Dollars (A) RIGHT OF WAY 14.1-and Acquisition & Relocation Assistance Acre Zc{OU 15 Utility Relocation (Desc ib d ROW . r e un er NOTES below) L S (B) 16. Clearing & Grubbing L?'JJ Acre ZCGCJ GRADING 17. Roadway Exc., incl. Haul ) Q[00 CY 1 5 ) ? Too 18. Borrow, incl. Haul (J CY 0 U GRADING 19. Other CD ? (C) IZ,r O O BASE 20. Base type C-IC,<,Z G rC VcN 10 89'1 Ton ?-f Z' ! ) ? BASE (D) 21. Crushed surfacing Z 0 ___ZL Ton ak D, ?F ) (,? p SURFACING 22• BST, ClassA C'7 Mile C) U 23 2r L IGS S Y' ACP/REC 0 C1, I - ?S ' e- SURFACING . . 1 Ton Z-O ?IU C? 24. Channel & Ditch Exc. CY 'j O d to d !a' PM?s cases 25. a) Culvert & Drain Pipe, installed 'o- . •t .I . - 7.l b Lf• ? i b) Culvert & Drain Pipe, installed n- e_,r Iv, Lf _ GtJ DRAINAGE x-24"T ISi as e) Culvert & Drain Pipe, installed a - Ceal.r, (d U . LL L I - I Z (o U 26. Riprap -00 Ton ISO I ?Uy 27. Structures less than 20' long _ Q Lf 7 DRAIN 28. Other Q . U O AGE .. L' 29. Signs Ea. _.ZOCD S (F) 30. Striping& Channeliration Mile eta TRAFFIC 31. Signals (Exist. Iotersee, w/signals ) el) Inter• SERVICES 32. Guardnll,Type _ Iti section Lf ,nom /?o(> 33. Illumination (rv ex(st. Illuminated ) _(2 . Mile d TRAF FIC 34. Other ..SERVICES 35. Sidewalks, !t. wide SY (G) 36. Oike paths/sniis mile riC? `?C? t ROADSIDE 37. Pencing,Type.?_Ll?ll`Q. -S-ZPIf) Lf L °I ZHO DEVELOPMENT 38, Erosion Control . . L S _ _ 39. Landscaping ___ ? . . Acre 0 ? ROADSIDE DE 40. Other •_ . VELOPMENT REPLACEMENT CONSTRUCTION COSTS- - 1. CATEGORY-O)S) IA lad' ) IDENTIFICATION . ' y+rr^ rs 2 Road Name "L`'4^rlJ?., y"4'1 ???Lk `$' `?-,? i ?: • ? 1 3. County a..+?. h C t,O n- •: 4I Route Number t.. rar a ?r.. '•'-h"1 + ' 6 Length Ml t ?t y Iys' !a 4 n v ', d: EXISTING GEOM ETRICS t f4c 4 t-x+. t irk g r s tt ? t t Z Pavement'1 pe U I t r V I?Et fa ,% t.? .? ? ,ti ? Y r ? mProv id O Gravel O BST ?iACP/PCC ? r ?? h 5 8 R j ? a` Ids?> 1 tl ' o ? }" ? t F _ ? ? 9 ;Tertain tLeyel Q Rolling Mountainous ? t r 5 E' [+rHl SYa `icy i. 7 . -, ; 1 (,' a IDl NO. O`(IhrY lines J ^? / ( ^ r t I1: AD7 1 ' G j' '. .. ?, ti y ? t. J?. Aye Right of Way wldth.i s' ft :?.v""('N a+`,"-;:13 ?t)lkp?lanes V sr? No ? , jjj REPLACEMENT COST ESTIMATE - - Task Activity Amount Unit Unit Cost Extension Total In Dollars RIGHT OF WAY 14. Land Acquisition & Relocation Assistance • z Acre I,Oex 7400 13. Utility Relocation (Describe under NOTES below) y _ L.S (,? eJ ROW (B) . 16. Clearing *& Grubbing - , { Acre 000 q? . GRP.DING 17. Roadway Exc.,lncl. Haul CY c r 18. Borrow, Incl. Haul CY -? _ 19. Other o y GRADING; (C) z BASE 20. Base type f_Ir\S?, CstAV al IZ 6 1 -?- Ton Z °_o ZS 3?? :: , BASE _ ZS I - (D) 21. Crushed surfacing Z 7 Ton 't-' e_o- SU RFACING 22. BST, CIas5A O Mile - 7? 21 ACP/PCC 0. 2 f L(FwsS F U -1 a - T C9 7 L16 9q() SURFACING I ,. on " , S? 6 24. Channel & Ditch Exc. Q e?? 25. a) Culvert & Drain Pipe, Installed Rl, A-,eldv. z- I C.:) Lf -7 (E) ?6' 7 • ) ; • n / Vaa i b) Culvert & Draln Pipe, installed x -w r . -I V Lf. ) ]1 ]_v ?'t- - Z5 7U DRAINAGE F, ? 's", c) Culvert & Drain Pipe, instilled _ ?<-au t v 0 Lf. 1 - u 70 . - 26. Rlprap ?U --?? Ton /.7o0 - 1 SO U 27. Structures less than 20' long Lf U - . 28. Other DRAINAGE 29. Signs Ea. 7C7U (F) 30, Striping & Channelleatlon ) Mlle z7 =? z2 ev TRAFFIC 31. Signals (Exist. internee, w/signals Inter- T ,on SERVICES 32. Guardrail, Type? y sect I ? , - Lt / y 33. Illumination (% exist. illuminated ) Mile TRAFFIC 1 - 34. Other +SERVICES - 3 walks, tt. wide ?". Sy (G) 3paths/tails ROADSIDE Mile 3 :7F ing, Typa1.17 ?N--eL DEVELOPM y? ENT 3ion Control L S . 3scaping Acre y ROADSIDE r ?.•, O DEVELOPMENT - -[ _ b 4 - SUBTOTAL 13 ?' O S 7 fHI • ? +Design Engineering at 10% Q 4 Construction Engineering at I S% Z d - NOTES GRAND TOTAL y7?,r" . -??? FORM 14 oar . rt!n 4"sdanasrY?a+,rns'...,.u.M.v+..w..,.., ?...?,......,?z,re..rc•nan m,.".,. .. ;-aHZSmpvrv ^..,vw?,... --•...mvanaw?CBaB?I`15?•r3R4$pS,e.,. ? ,' ) x s ,, -?, J• s rIDENTIFICATION v 9 " ran y ) 1,.' ? ? e r; 2 F'Road.Nime'n kV'q?•??"?-t`•. tl> 3. County .4.'R ou te Number 5.^.A7P? 'i . ta: 61P c` s_ ?7; 6. Length Mi. REPLACEMENT CONSTRUCTION COSTS L CATEGORY ;Z-0751 4'Fl C. 10)1` ':" s art r >;" 's-"T t r? ,. CXISTING GEOM ETRICS v;r +?"' rt ;J FMS' !?? t !?. YI„ + ?, r a l.v +s1 _. zA ' n. „s a v.V ' " [ P !,' :r ? K ? !r- r - c f y . ?f e+r ?t ?, r rt {J.,???? yy d . i 7a s Wld{It nfF r[Llu feet .t "? '? ti , av,y? 5 t:8 Roaawa 7 ,Pavement 1YDe Uglrpproved ?Gn el ? BSTr7J ACP?PCC-?t?t?v ' v x a[ % .? t xl ?, t tLIM Y. r F r 1 1F tTP _hy? t? F ` r ???• Y7 .y..m-'r c'.?t P4? ?( 9 ::T rrain tL el Qs Rolling ?. Motinlalnous ? j ? !. ? a s.? ? I a 1,Oz No o?U1ru IanesCJ'..? 3? r.> ..'? ? S J f L>r T t ) t F > a t ri V!H yhN y ,,.` ? y,,,s ? h'^'44t 13?B r?,No k lane> ye ? yon c w t - ? , " w I ? i . idth 72 Ave Ri hi of Wa ft ADT . 11: { s - Uu REPLACEMENT COST ESTIMATE Total in Task Activity Amount Unit Unit Cost Extension Dollars r (A1 uisition & Relocation Assistance and Ac 1 14 ) Acre 7-020 2400 ROW RIGHT OF WAY q . - 15. Utility Relocation (Describe under NOTES below) U L.S. y Z a'1 O C.7 _p Clearin & Grubbing 16 Acre X00 )Z')?-0 ` (B) g . incl. Haul Roadway Exc 17 WOO CY I ?S00 C.? GRADING • ., . Haul incl ow B U CY O GRADING . , orr 18. 19. Other ?J U 14.2 1 Z V (C) IV pe L 1(\sS C>. oQ a \ Base t 0 1 L. S? Ton 3 q' ASE BASE y . 2 (D) 21. Crushed surfacing Z 7 2, Ton ,!5 11 , S SURFACING Cl A Mile SURFACING ass 22. BST, C 15 i T - , 23. ACP/PCC on nnel & Ditch Exc Ch 24 nn GO CY 40 . a . c•it'Pta,.r installed R 'J- r.n.r a) Culvert & Drain Pipe 25 Z I L) LL 7 OP 1470 , (E) , , N?ve„rr t s1o.' b) Culvert & Drain Pipe, installed -6,0- Z C)O Lf. o0 ? q`740 I DRAINAGE Lnw-r."4.- c) Culvert & Drain Pipe, installed x -au 6r 14O Lf• z I aO_ 29 L1 O 26 i 1 50 Ton 1 SO° Z Z Sy . R prap Structures less than 20' long 27 D Lt G O DRAINAGE • . . 00 1 28. Other Signs 29 5 Ea. LOG . Striping & Channciization 30 ? Mile Z (P) . w/signals ) Intersee (Exist l 31 Si Inters Q TRAFFIC , . gna s . ,.,lion Guardrall Typt -T 32 r J= Lt. lQ "" ?'O«? TRAFFIC SERVICES , , d ) % is ill i -- - U Mile 0 SERVICES um nate ex t. 33. Illumination ( 34. Other _ U 1 9 wide lks ft Sid U SY . ewa , 35. (G) Bike pathsltcslls 36 I Mlle ln-- ROADSIDE- . pe l.?sr6 37 Fencin T _ nkQ I f 1= ? q5 .e Q DEVELOPMENT , g, y . 38 sion Control E - . . L S .- Q ROADSIDE , ro 39 Landsca in U . . Acre U O DEVELOPMENT p g l 1 40. Other_ i ?r IDENTIFICATION -- 2• Road Namc '\ ) ? +f. ? ,) o_?v-? a r 5 Os?. 3. County 4. Route Number 51' MP, to MP r; l F n 6. Length -E=--= Ml. REPLACEMENT CON51'RUCTION COSTS--- 1. CATEGORY 41-6400 e 01L'?t ' f i ks 1 7; l.r tin ?5 tirr i s ?r EXISTING GEOM ETRICS t-r L r - {Js?a ?ri'z? t ? la„9 : r•?sy I`ly t . 7'Pavement{YPe Ugimprov d wit vµfr4?r OaG ravel? BST 14ACP/PCC?y1 'i a t 8 R 4r n r I# ?. t s t , rC t oa i feetj T i s • s1 rY r?a?k r ?''7' - i t 4?. di .. tiRr? r.cn f• r s T s. n {+ : k ' i t dd)I, t v ? .+ s 9..T rraln Leycl QI RoI11ngM ?n_ra7nous ? 't' ) 1 'i rd ?„?s"' ? . 1Of, lyo o Illiu linest' ??5 r.r ?? n?? ? , r k? ADT ry .- Y :.. y? W t l r:. _? fy .t.t t. F,} i',?, ?Jr• f"t ? Tr1w ? r / ? r 1 ' i - - . Q V . te , . t .4 ? : •' • ? . •• • ,?, s? ;)1 { 2 Ave Right, of l dy wldtti ' h r rt"" ] 3 ikc+lane> , es No {{ -j 1 I REPLACEMENT COST ESTIMATE Task Activity Amount Unit Unit Cost Extension Total in Dollars (A) RIGHT OF WAY 19•Land Acquisition & Relocation Assistance Acre 7 15. Utility Relocation (Describe under NOTES below) L.S. ROW (g) 16. Clearing & Grubbing 31101 Acre ZoOy 7z Rc J GRADING 17. Roadway Exc., incl. Haul Vi .ooy CY l j5 .. 1 SC)Q 18. Borrow, incl. Haul , y CY ; U 19. Other ' C? ?J GRADING Z y 7 8 (C) 20, Basetype 41 C+rev 1 12" .1 Ton So Z'?' 20, 6"?S2 BASE Z Z (D) 21. Crushed surfacing lot O Ton Ski ZD SURFACING 22 BST, ClassA -,?-1,1,0 ' Mile 15,01"1 5019 _ 23. ACP/PCC Ton SURFACING Z ?? S 9 24. Channel & Ditch Exc. ' ve Cy y ?' f (p [7 'i>rF r,a Kr IS'12 25. a) Culvert & Drain Pipe, installed cola ,;S) ` Lf. 2 ?y Z ten 1 (E) -.IE Kr.l6Ja1 b) Culvert & Drain Pipe, installed Iv. _ I ZCJ Lf (7 ?° 7 O e( (? DRAINAGE ryse'r c) Culvert & Drain Pipe, installed 11 - t rtVv. _,(1 LL °U. ? / •?' 1 Z (o U 26. Riprap Q Q? Ton / Sc)U . 27. Structures less than 20' long 0 Lf DRAINAGE 28. Other p . SZ - ? to S 29. Signs Ea. p° UQU (F) 30. Striping & Channcliaation Mile TRAFFIC 31. Signals (Exist. Interscc. w/signals • eInt ltc iorn f SERVICES 32. Guardrail, Type :;"-a I'SU Lf. &:?Co 33. Illumination (% exist. Illuminated ) y Mlle TRAFFIC SERVICES 34. Other _ _ n •. 35. Sidewalks, __ ft. wide r? SY ? CD 1 C. 1 rd?L'il (G) 36. Me paths/trails Mile ROADSIDE 37. Fencing,TYpt Z Z-e"'d. Lf. `C/c DEVELOPMENT 38. Erosion Control L S Q 0 39. Landscaping . . Acre 10 ROADSIDE DEVELOPMEN ?.. 40. Othtr T v 6 I 1'- -= F SUBTOTAL IH) Q + Design Engineering at 10% 1 3 ?? X?11 + Construction Englneerinpat IS% - • GRAND TOTAL EI ElL j, Z A h r IDENTIFICATION r r 2 Raadl ime ` 'i'e+2,u, YV?'?IkFv.?.th!.C^;.-? J tr ^ 3. County ?TO.Y?et 4• Route Number+ 5.. A1P r to MP1''' 6. Length REPLACEMENT CONS fRUCTIONCOSTS CATEGORY U-5v0-13(3z?) 1 .; :. < is. p 1 y1„Y ` rt -..EXtSTING.GEOMETR)CS td4 ?`,?'' C'I"C w'.?t"?4 t>y!'. lt•.rl a. al 5. ? r. t -'ri aP f r is t 4 .a(?P??ryy? ? 7 Pav meat IYPe. ^ Unl{frpro^id ? Gravel (? RST ? ACP/PCC ? '?tCrsJr !tit t 5t tt 8 nRoaQwa Widt7ss t?k?U feel -f .,wlll,?T t ??+y • ; r, t, t" x! '?1rM :: r t ? `? t Ir. 7T•r rt l F ? ?i?? 7"yt-T j' Z.. x?`*^ hk ??, ? 4 .9 Ternlq s1 e16 RollingJrlo nrainous? f. L - a y ° 10 tyP ofYhfU IanestY 3d °t?•T .,I ?., N• ,{^ fivn^'"• t i : (?Ci.,3" °``RI !r .r.,.. 7r e,? 1t 91: ADT •''i „ w 1 r 12.;Av R ght of 14ay'I :dth... 1,3 •f$ike?lane?y es, No ? ti REPLACEMENT COST ESTIMATE Task Activit Y Amount Unit Unit Cost Extension Total In Dollars (A) 1j, Land Acquisition & Relocation Assistance ? Acre 0 !? ROW RIGHT OF WAY 15. Utility Relocation (Describe under NOTES below) ) L.S. d B 16. Clearing & Grubbing { y Acre 2Cx?0 ('1 ? J ( ) GRADING 17. Roadway Exc., Incl. Haul CY --z' Is 5CX7:) :ncl. Haul Borrow 18 CY O GRAUING , . 19. Other o (C) 1Zn Bast type _(??^-.sS C <CkV 20 IC?r 3 Ton Z?`? ?U Zz- BASE BASE . z z/ (D) 21. Crushed surfacing I 0\0? Ton SURFACING CIas$A 7- 61 k0i5 22 BST Mite 1501q )SIO 1q SURFACING , - 23. ACP/PCC Ton Z c( 24. Channel & Ditch Exc. ?U CY ?'•-? Z? U r 5-A">'?`w tout. a) Culvert & Drain Pipe installed 25 3 / c Lf. 7=?U ZZ O3? (E) , . r. t Sr.. t b) Culvert & Drain Pipe, installed Z ?x- tsi lv • I ZO LL ) ??= ZQt-? U DRAINAGE r e0"r•, S-I e) Culvert & Drain Pipe, installed w-<. IV, to C.U Lf ZtCis, 1 Z. tD U 26 Riprap I Cc') . Ton I5= 1500 . 27, Structures less than 20' long U L( y DRAINAGE 28. Other • 29. Signs 1 t? Ea, F Striping& Channelication 30 1 Mile ZZ? ZZ ?•? II ( ) . intersce. w/signals Signals (Exist 31 Inlcr- Q Q , I TRAFFIC SERVICES . . 32. Guardrail,Type. _ 1ta j?t, a nion LI. ?? 1U 1,560 TRAFFIC illuminated ) 33 Illumination (%exLt r1 Mile SERVICES . . 34. Other _ y 0 C) Z?Z ft. wide Sidewalks 35 SY (G) , __ . 36. Bike paths/tails Mile r ? ? w U ROADSIDE 37. Fencing, Type 71_ Lo Ira. 'i $R'0 Lf 1'15 q ? ?? .?Z=_ DEVELOPMENT 38. Erosion Control CD L S 0 C, DSIDE O Landscaping 39 Q . . Acre y Q R A DEVELOPMENT . 40. Other ---Q_ _ O o ) `/ Jt LLd SUBTOTAL t?_91 r?Org?? IH) ?1 aDesign Engineering at 10% ? i Construction Englneerin; at 15% 2 ' GRANDTOTAL a a 'Y• a 1r IDENTIFICATION n its s? ?r' - 2 Road Name"" 'f •:s+?y?-.Qx'„'t sr•a 3. County ?4??ec5c7r. '4. Route Number ht;. '.- ?y S...MP•,? ry aM CJ 6. Length E== Mi. REPLACEMENT CON I -RUCTION COSTS IL 1. CATEGORY s ,*+, aNl+ts '1xTp EXISTING GEOAS ETRICS F.t I ?'° C'1"j`tias.SiKOa rrs!• ' l.X i? 1 t. yI^, 7 .Pavement IYPe Ugimprov d ?aG ravel? BST ? ACP//PCC ? Jt s ? ?'0 K t f r Iro s ? s ? C i ? ? [ If Iii r M e! [ 1! u -, ° <. (F 1 fC p s..i r ? t g rRo??? a?WldtlttrYfeet??.?1,1 7 t ?? ? j .. 9-T rraln L elQRal,l gl?•,hlounwlno s? c ) t Jta ??°? - alO?nN,o. o?117N Iines,YT?Y c Tyr/>l??.nR "s Q., r l s,r, 1?; A e Rsght of I4ay w dtFi: ? ,... K n q ,r,,,,i7 3 0 kenlane>q, es ? No? :• REPLACEMENT COST ESTIMATE Task Activity Amount Unit Unit Cost Ea[enslon Total in Dollars ( RIGHT OF WAY 11.1-and Acquisition & Relocat:on Assistance Acre ZDLXJ ZyOO 15. Utility Relocation (Describe under NOTES below) C) L.S. -L) ROW 4 O (B) 16. Clearing 4 Grubbing :52- Acre ZCOO ra,[g rn ( } GRADING 17. Roadway Exc., incl. Haul .? -t-s?.sc= Cy I r S . 7 O 18. Borrow, in , 1. Haul O CY O 19. Other c7 -SZ -? GRADING P?c?. ?? III,yR+? Ton 7°v ?Z 96St ? BASE (D) 21. Crushed surfacing Z1-5je? Ton 5°-= _10,1090 SURFACING 22. BST, Class A Mile 23. ACP/PCC ca, \?iS F 7) 1 Ton ZdC 4z ZOO SURFACING Sz4 25. a) Culvert 4 Drain Pipe, weed P" Na.cuI- 1 O Lf. (E) b) Culvert & Drain Pipe, weed- r, _ esty. -LSD- - - LL y U DRAINAGE C) Culvert & Drain Pipe, _ 11.a?r..1,.ea called _ !•-a1 y. ? LL '2 1 oy I Zcoo 26. Riprap Ton 1S°-" 7SC0 I 27. Structures less than 20' ' _ Lf. 0 DRAINAGE 28. Other 29. Signs ?Z Ea. ??- SS2 (F) 30. Striping & Channelization 1 Mile . TRAFFIC 31. Signals (Exist. inters?c, gnals ) C7 Inter i SERVICES 32. Guardrail,Type sect on LL co 33. Illumination (% exist. nat ed ) _yZ Mlle ?? TRAFFIC i SERVICES 34. Other- l . e d SY O 1 (G) 36. Bike paths/Ir.lis --? Mile 5D ROADSIDE 37. Fcncing,Type Ir -G -_ 1'3Z U Lf. DEVELOPMENT 38. Erosion Control L S U 39. Landscaping u . . Acre tO G ROADSIDE DEVELOPMENT , Fill- -? e!` ••? REPLACEMENT CON51'RUCTION COSTS ), CATEGORY?U-?OO t3C?y ` j t -? u- 5 r IDENTIFICATION r ( ? e+rd s I r x, r ; 3 Road Namez 3. County -Q f f 71 4.Routc Number r. 7 S MP to MPS" 'rs _ 6. Length Mi. I i .. * srf it ? i a - ? alL. ?Y'?LaG,{',? y f1?T?'f?t'r, ??4.llr L . t s EXISTING1GEOM ETR iC5 ? _ ,• 4? t d 7 Pavement {ype Uglmprov d ? Gravel ? BS ACP/PCC ? y1 r ? °'r v7 y g tb na. J??,,rr" t t l Raadwa ? "`feet r? W wldi}IS n - ? IC 1 4 - t i { 1 i s t a ..7 . t; M .. a1 ! ` I F i y r 1 Y pr ? , , F (, ? r__,__ riN Yq- '?+ ' ?` ?? 7 ; + 4 i h ) ? F - 9 Terrain (Level ET Rolling ? Mounralnous ? t• ; I t = Y ? t .'r 10 f Np o (Utru Ianes . - xp t _ 1• r , te ? 4 t , . Y'.i r M - ,liVnw .. j)r t f 1, .? a 1N J r?_ J tr 4. +e r _^. '' •. s • f 11. ADT Ave Rlgbtpf Wa y dth d, ? fn nK°?'y?`C ,13' Bikf,)ane; y5's? No hr. REPLACEMENT COST ESTIMATE Task Activity Amount Unit Unit Cost Extension Total In Dollars (A) RIGHT OF WAY 14.1.2nd Acquisition & Relocation Assistance `•Z•- Acre 3j 00 7 `4 NOW 15. Utility Relocation (Describe under NOTES below) L S Q C) . . O (B) 16. Clearing & Grubbing Acre _ZQ00 ) (n 4h GRADING 17. Roadway Exc., Incl. Haul tgoco CY ) S ?1 -5-c, C) 18. Borrow, Incl. Haul CY C) Q NG 19. Omer 0 n GRADI ?l3 I LIE . 02 (C) BASE 20. Base type e'1aSS -tb.y4' I ^l Ton B ASE Z (D) 21. Crushed surfacing Z 1 Ton ?e" 5 Ck Q SURFACING 22. BST, Clas,A Z-Si?o}t Mile J*5 9/4 16, 219 10 U F NG - S R ACI 23. ACP/PCC Ton 24. Channel & Ditch Exc. ("L.D CY z ? rI_t,Wc. 25. a) Culvert & Drain Pipe, installed rRC rtty"rP`-Ire Lf. -7 Z S (E) a •rd'7 r• i gaorl b) Culvert & Drain Pipe, installed - el Iv 11?CJ LL DRAINAGE I au C) Culvert & Drain Pipe, installed A•C.u IV (? Lf ?fov. 1z (oO 26. Riprap . Ton ? 7 SU 27. Structures less than 20'long © Lf DRAINAGE 28. Other G , U Cj 4 9. Signs 2 Z Ea. gOSO- / lT 80 ," (F) 30. Striping & Channeilzation ? Mile zz ° TRAFFIC 31. Signals (Exist,lntersee.w/signals ) Q Inierr. 7J SERVICES 32. Guardniljypr pn. s LL I [J? 1!500 I 33. Illumination (% rxL•t. illuminated ) Mlle Gry TRAFFIC •. SERVICES f 34. Other G' U Q 35. Sidewalks, h, wide •_? SY Q v (G) 36. Me paths/trails Mile _Z7100 ,SZo C) ROADSIDE 37. Fencing, Type -E- (,1);1<d, _ Lf. DEVELOPMENT 38. Erosion Control C7 L.S 39 . ROADSIDE l* . Landscaping Aue ,f -)_ DEVELOPMENT 40. Other SUBTOTAL Lj 00 4 Design Engineering at 10% I ID-s--CAJ • a Construction Engineering at 1594 A-! GRANDTOTAL NOTES A o?T fO11M I ae 0aa ' _ r ! r ~? ?4. r, ?`- ?: !?+ Y' '?: E', y? S` C4; !'d; ... E ????3??` .y ?? I J information OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL SLADE GORTON ATTORNEY GENERAL TEMPLE OF JUSTICE OLYMPIA, WASHINGTON 98501 COUNTIES--HIGHWAYS--ROADS--POLICE POWER--MANDATORY REMOVAL OF SIGHT OBSTRUCTIONS FROM PRIVATE PROPERTY. s (1) A county ordinance adopted under Article XI, § 11 of the state constitution may not require the owner of land abutting a county road intersection, without compensation, to remove preexisting trees and other vegetation or structures from within a prescribed distance of the in- tersection in order to provide an unobstructed view across ?. the owner's land for vehicles approaching the intersection. (2) A county may, however, secure the removal of such sight obstructions at an intersection by exercising its constitutional powers of eminent domain. August 5, 1975 Honorable Arthur R. Eggers Prosecuting Attorney Walla Walla County 401 Drumheller Building Cite as: Walla Walla, Washington 99362 AGO 1975 No. 17 Dear Sir: By letter previously acknowledged you have requested our opinion on three questions which we paraphrase as follows: I, (1) May a county by ordinance adopted under Article XI, § 11 of the state constitution require the owner of land abutting a county road intersection, without compensation, to remove preexisting trees, other vegetation or struc- tures from within a prescribed distance of the intersec- tion in order to provide an unobstructed view across the owner's land for vehicles approaching the intersection? (2) If the answer to question (1) is in the affirmative, may the ordinance provide that upon failure of the owner to remove such vegetation, structures, or equipment from r his land within the prescribed distance of the intersec- tion after appropriate notice and hearing, the county will be authorized to accomplish such work and impose a lien n rn Honorable Arthur R. Eggers -2- AGO 1975 No. 17 upon the land for the costs it has incurred? (3) If the answer to question (1) is in the negative, could a county secure removal of such obstructions in order to improve the sight distance at an intersection by exercising its powers of eminent domain? We answer your first question in the negative and your third in the qualified affirmative; consideration of your second question is thereby rendered unnecessary. ANALYSIS Counties are authorized by RCW 36.86.020 to establish minimum standards for the construction of county roads and, accordingly, can properly establish minimum sight distances at intersections as is proposed in your opinion request. Your questions essentially ask whether, insofar as preexisting conditions are concerned, such sight distances may be secured by a police power type regula- tion; or, instead, would such action require the acquisi- tion of property by purchase or by condemnation under applicable statutes and Article I, § 16 of our state con- stitution which provides that: " . . No private property shall be taken or damaged for public or private use without just compensation having been first made, or paid into court for the owner, and no right-of-way shall be appropriated to the use of any corpora- tion other than municipal until full compensation therefor be first made in money, or ascertained and paid into court for the owner, irrespective of any benefit from any improvement proposed by such corporation, . Question (1): XI, § 11 contains a direct grant o po p and cities in the following language: 0 There is no specific statutory authority for counties to restrict the use of private property adjacent to road intersections for the purpose of maintaining sight distances for vehicles approaching the intersection. However, Article f lice ower to counties l Honorable Arthur R. Eggers -3- court said in Detamore V. Hindle y, 83 Wash. 322, 145 Pac. 62: s "'This is a direct delegation of the police power as ample within its limits as that possessed by the legislature itself. It requires no legislative sanction for its exercise so long as the subject-matter is local, and the regula- tion reasonable and consistent with the general laws."' i a The central question remains, however, as to whether a regulation requiring the removal of preexisting sight ob- structions from private property constitutes a valid police power regulation or is, instead, a taking or damaging of private property requiring the payment of compensation. "Any county, city, town or township may make and enforce within its limits all such local police, sanitary and other regulations as are not in con- flict with general laws." As was said in Seattle v. Ross, 54 Wn. 2d 655, 659, 344 P. 2d 216 (1959 "The police power of a municipality is derived through Art. XI, § 11, of the state constitution. Commenting upon that provision of the constitution, this Honorable Arthur R. Eggers -4- AGO 1975 No. 17 The use of this power to control and regulate the use of private property has found its greatest extension in the law of zoning, the purposes of which are to stabilize the use and value of property and to preserve the character of neighborhoods. McNauzhton v. Boeing, 68 Wn. 2d 659, 414 P. 2d 778 (1966). In Lenci v. Seattle, 63 Wn. 2d 664, 388 P. 2d 926 (1964), the court quote with approval from Hi hwa 100 Auto Wreckers v. West Allis, 6h Wis. 2 637eneral 96 N.W. , 97 NN.W.- 2d 3 upheld general 150 foot setback from a street line. Similar ordinances providing for general setback lines have often been adopted by Washington cities and counties as a part of their general zoning ordinances. In our view, however, the court's approval of such general land use and zoning controls, the purpose of which is to stabilize the use and value of property and preserve the character of neighborhoods, does not control the question presented here. The cases considering the limits of authority of the state or municipalities to regulate private land use which are most instructive for our present purposes relate to con- trols associated with the construction, maintenance, or operation of highways. In Markham Advertisin Co. v. State, 73 Wn. 2d 405, 439 P. 2d 24 t e court approve the Highway Advertising Control Act as a valid exercise of the state's police power. Specifically, the court held that the act (requiring the removal of certain signs within 660 feet of designated highways) bore a reasonable and sub- stantial relation to a proper legislative purpose which f t 1 E i included the promotion of traffic sa a y. The line between a taking o&. property for which compensa- tion must be paid and a police power regulation has been marked out with some particularity with respect to control of access to public highways. The owner of land abutting d upon a conventional highway has an easement of ingress an attached ht ri rt , g y egress. This has been treated as a prope entitled to just compensation i s to the land. Such an owner if this easement or property right is taken or damaged. State v. Calkins, 50 Wn. 2d 716, 314 P. 2d 449 (1957). But the 2d 79 (1964) 395 P 872 , . , n Ka in v. Seattle, 64 Wn. 2d court held that the installation on a street of traffic ' s regulatory markers which interfered with an abutting owner ingress and egress would constitute a taking or damaging where the interference was unreasonable. onl rt f y y prope o The court concluded that such interference was not ? L v . iL C Honorable Arthur R. Eggers -5- AGO 1975 No. 17 unreasonable where it resulted from the regulation of the general direction, flow, or diversion of all traffic on the street as long as the owner's practical access rights were not entirely cut off. Likewise, in Walker v. State, 48 Wn. 2d 587, 295 P. 2d 328 (1956), the court a that the rerouting and diversion of traffic by a center line barrier is a proper object of a police power regulation and that the circuity of travel resulting from such an exercise of this power is an incidental result of a law- ful act and not the taking or damaging of a property right within the meaning of Article I, § 16 of the state con- stitution, supra. On the other hand, in Uler v. Kitsa Count , 188 Wash. 519, 523, 63 P. 2d 352 3 it was he d that the con- struction of a county road which caused adjacent private property to be flooded by surface waters constituted a taking a taking and damaging under Article I, § 16 and therefore required the payment of compensation for the damages sustained. In so holding the court observed: "The construction of highways by a county is lawful; but a county has no right to construct a highway to the damage of a private citizen of the county, and any use of land for a public purpose which in- flicts an injury upon adjacent land, such as would have been actionable by a pri- vate owner, is a taking and damaging within the constitution, and the fact that it was not condemned in advance does not absolve it from liability where no negli- gence is charged in the performance of a governmental duty. " [Citing cases.) Accord, Harkoff v. Whatcom Count 40 Wn. 2d 147, 241 P. 2d 932 (1952 . f r It may thus be seen that the question under consideration cannot easily be answered either by reference to the con- ventional definition of police power - i.e., those laws enacted in furtherance of public safety, morals, health ` and welfare - or to the usual description of an exercise of the power of eminent domain, to-wit, the taking of property or a right in property from a private owner for I. the public use. There can be no doubt that an ordinance Honorable Arthur R. Eggers -6- AGO 1975 No. 17 requiring the removal of preexisting sight obstructions from private property adjacent to a road intersection would have a direct relationship to traffic safety and if that were the only test it would qualify as a valid exercise of the police power. At the same time a governmental restric- tion which would require such action must, in practical terms at least, be seen to deprive the owner of the most important attributes of ownership of the affected property. The boundary between police power and eminent domain, while difficult to discern, is discussed in 16 Am. Jur. 2d 518, Constitutional Law, § 264: "The boundary line which divides the police power of the state from the other functions of government is often difficult to discern, but it is distinguishable from taxation, and, although its exercise and the exercise of eminent domain have much in common, the police and eminent domain powers are also essentially distinct. Thus, under the police power, many restrictions may be im- posed without compensation being given, whereas under the power of eminent domain compensation is required. A further and more important distinction lies in the fact I that in eminent domain, property or a right I j in property is taken from the owner and transferred to a public agency to be enjoyed _ by it as its own, whereas under the police power, although it may, and often does, take property in the constitutional sense so that it must be paid for, this is not accomplished by a transfer of ownership, but by destroying j the property or impairing its value. " Or, as stated more explicitly by our own court in Conger v. Pierce County, 116 Wash. 27, 198 Pac. 377 (1921), while t e police power permits regulation of private property even to its destruction under the necessity of the public health, peace, or welfare, when private property rights are taken from the individual and are conferred u Don the ublic for public use eminent domain princip es are app ica e. n specifically applicable to the question presented here is the holding of Boitano v. Snohomish Count , 11 Wn. 2d 664, 668, 120 P. 2d 490 (1941), that: G , ?J Honorable Arthur R. Eggers '7- AGO 1975 "The taking or damaging of property to the extent that it is reasonably neces- sary to the maintenance and operation of other property devoted to a public use is, likewise, a taking or damaging for a public use. . . •" I r No. 17 See, also, Anderson v. Port of Seattle, 49 Wn. 2d 528, 304 P. 2d 7 5 1 5 In the instant case it appears to us that the propos county regulation requiring the removal of existing obstructions from private property adjacent to a roa intersection can only be justified as a measure nece For the maintenance and operation of the existing col roads which are properly devoted to a public use. A Lngly, we must conclude that the taking of the prope ggoing purpose :onstituteaaptaking orndama use twith waning of Article I, § 16.? ed sight d ssary nty \ ccord- rty _ itself in the In so concluding on the basis of the pertinent obs tions and reasoning to be found in the above cited Washington cases, we also appear to have struck a of demarcation between police power and eminent do similar that appeals ofMaryland win Stevens v. Cit bof t of Salis 240 Md.556, 214 A. 2d 775 held as a proper exercise of the policeepowercaupoi tion of a city ordinance restricting future conditi on private property which would constitute interse sight obstructions; however, at the same time it in validated other portions of the same ordinance whi without compensation, would have required the remo preexisting structures. Although the court in so ing did allow the city to requirethe trimming of ex ing trees and hedges without payment to the propert owner, it did so only to the extent that the trimmi • . will not destroy the usefulness of the objec trimmed or result in substantial loss to the proper owner." Id., p• 784. We are enclosing a copy of t Maryland case for your immediate reference and cons deration. erva- line main urt bur , up - ons etion - ch, val of hold- ist- y ng t t his i- r Honorable Arthur R. Eggers -8- AGO 1975 No. 17 Question (2): Because of the above negative answer to question (1) no answer is required to your second question. Question (3): Assuming the foregoing negative response to your first question, you have finally asked whether a county may exercise its powers of eminent domain to control the use of lands adjacent to a road intersection in order to main- tain minimum sight distance. As noted at the outset, RCW 36.86.020 authorizes counties to establish minimum standards for the construction of county roads. Such standards may include provision for minimum sight distance at intersections. The necessary i clearing of property adjacent to such intersections can be < accomplished either by acquiring in fee the zone to be maintained free of obstructions or by acquiring an easement which would require the zone to be so maintained. Existing statutes contain ample authority to acquire such property or right in property by purchase or condemnation. RCW 36.75.040 provides, in part, as follows: "The board of county commissioners of each county, in relation to roads and bridges, shall have the power and it shall be its duty to: "(1) Acquire in the manner provided by law property real and personal and acquire or erect structures necessary for the administration of the county roads of such county; 11(3) Acquire land for county road purposes by purchase, gift, or condemnations and L Honorable Arthur R. Eggers -9- AGO 1975 No. 17 for the administration of the county roads of such county as by law provided; n .n RCW 36.85.010 also provides, in pertinent part: "Whenever it is necessary to secure any lands for a right-of-way for any county road or for the drainage thereof or to afford unobstructed view toward anv intersection or point of possible danger to public travel upon any county road or for any borrow pit, gravel pit, quarry, or other land for the extraction of material for county road purposes, or right-of-way for access thereto, the board may acquire such lands on behalf of the county by gift, purchase, or condemnation. ' (Emphasis supplied.) RCW 8.08.010 authorizes counties generally to condemn land and property within their boundaries for public use. 4 Finally, RCW 8.08.020 provides that: i i "Any condemnation, appropriation or dis- intended in RCW 8.08.010 through position 8.08.080 shall be deemed and held to be for a county purpose and public use within the meaning of RCW 8.08.010 through 8.08- .080 when it is directly or indirectly, approximately or remotely for the general benefit or welfare of the county or of the " inhabitants thereof. In Kin Count v. Theilman, 59 Wn. 2d 586, 369 P. 2d 503 (1962 it was held that as a general rule the acquisition of private property for the purpose of constructing and maintaining a county road is for a "public usewithin the constitution and RCW 8.08.020. The court added, how- fp ever, that "in the determination of public use of a piece of property sought to be taken, is an element of public necessity. The rule must be applied to the facts of each Z case. The court then quoted from State ex rel. Church V. - - - 1208 TI 7d P. Suoerior Court, 40 Wn. 2d 90, 91, 270 Honorable Arthur R. Eggers -1U- AUU i7iJ AU. relating to the determination of necessity as follows: The rule is well settled in this state that a declaration of necessity by the proper munici- pal authorities is conclusive, in the absence of actual fraud or such or capricious conduct as .arbitrary m u t to constructive rau . . (59 Wn, 2d 595. In our opinion the acquisition of private property deemed necessary by a board of county commissioners to establish sight distances at road intersections in conformity with adopted minimum road standards would, subject to the narrow limitations contained in the rule set forth in the Church case, constitute a public use. We trust that the foregoing will be of assistance to you. Enc. ROADS MAINTAINED BY JEFFERSON COUNTY AT THE "WEST END" ROAD QUINAULT SOUTH SHORE ROAD OUEETS RIVER ROAD CLEARWATER ROAD QUEETS CANNERY ROAD HOH VILLAGE ROAD NANSEN ANDERSON ROAD LOWER HOH ROAD/OIL CITY ROAD MAPLE CREEK ROAD OLD OWL CREEK ROAD OWL CREEK ROAD UPPER HOH ROAD OSCAR PETERSON ROAD SOUTH BOGACHIEL ROAD NORTH BOGACHIEL RIVER ROAD LENGTH 4.11 0.60 4.13 0.40 1.90 0.11 10.98 1.49 0.04 1.59 12.04 0.21 2.49 1.45 1 r,- Maintenance Private 7 f 0 1407 Quincy Port Townsend, Wa. 98368 November 26, 1985 Jefferson County Public Works Department Courthouse Port Townsend, Wa. 98368 Dear Sirs, The private road just off of Lillian Street (near A & G Auto in Hadlock) and behind the City Reservoir, is currently impassable due to the snow conditions. I am requesting that you declare an emergency and grade this road so that the residents of this area (11 families) will have access to necessary services. My daughter lives in the area with h er two small children (one year and three years old), one of which requires special medical attention `on occasion. James D. Crutcher d i t? p/err oat iya.:Q j i15 f/u G?eo g.1111re7 1 1 . L_ y -1 1 J In the matter of A Contract for Road Maintenance on The Quinault South Shore Road No. 911807 STATE OF WASHINGTON COUNTY OF JEFFERSON x CONTRACT NO. B6 - iO - / x x x WHEREAS, John Corey, hereinafter referred to as the "CONTRACTOR" proposes to do road maintenance on the Quinault South Shore Road No. 911807 on behalf of the County of Jefferson, a municipal corporation of the State of Washington, hereinafter referred to as the "COUNTY", in compliance with all procedures and description of work, terms and conditions hereinafter described. WHEREAS, the CONTRACTOR represents that he has the expertise to perform the services described to the standards required by the COUNTY. 1. SCOPE OF WORK Attached as Exhibit "A". II. PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE i Thie agreement shall be effective as of the day oe x,1988. The project shall begin upon written notice to the CONTRACTOR by the COUNTY to proceed and shall terminate 385 days from the date thereof unless extended or terminated by written agreement. The CONTRACTOR sh from the date of this < The COUNTY shall herein. ff IV. OBLIGATIONS OF CONTRACTOR A. The CONTRACTOR shall works such days and hours as required to accomplish the work as shown in Exhibit "A". B. The CONTRACTOR shall correct any deficient work performed by him/her on the contract within four (4) days. The CONTRACTOR will furnish fuel, oil and lubrication for road grader. C . the D. The CONTRACTOR will provide written weekly reports to the COUNTY, on appropriate fore supplied by the COUNTY. V. OBLIGATIONS OF THE COUNTY ( A. The COUNTY shall furnish applicable written instructions as to the operation, edures applicable to operation of the road. maintenance requirements, and any other proc The COUNTY shall furnish final decisions on questions not covered by the above. B . C. The West End Leadman acting as the COUNTY shall be available for consultation a minimum of one (1) hour each month. West End Leadman acting as the COUNTY shall furnish final decisions in writing Th e D. on questions not covered by the above material furnished. COUNTY shall review work performed by the CONTRACTOR every three (3) months Th h e e E. from the date of signing of this contract. Such review will be in writing to t CONTRACTOR' for road maintenance. will furnish the grader required fo P. The COUNTY i VI. - 1 COMPENSATION TO THE CONTRACTOR The CONTRACTOR shall be paid by the COUNTY on a $500.00 per month basis beginning at the commencement of this contract. VII. INSURANCE The CONTRACTOR will be covered under the COUNTY'S policy for this type of wock. VIII. SOCIAL SECURITY AND OTHER TAXES f The CONTRACTOR assumes full responsibility for the payment of all payroll taxes, and ts required by any County, City, Federal or State other form of taxes or other paymen hich are now or may during the term of the contract be enacted in performance legislation w of the work under this contract and shall assure exclusive liability therefore, and meet rules or regulations that may apply. an t t y o all requirements thereunder pursuan 2 as • a -, 1 , . ?l 1 J i -77?. IX. TERMINATION OF THIS CONTRACT A. The COUNTY may terminate this contract by notifying the CONTRACTOR thirty (30) days in advance of termination in writing by Certified Mail of its intentions to do so at any time and for any reason whatsoever. In event of such terminations, the COUNTY shall be obligated to reimburse the CONTRACTOR for services performed and expenses incurred to date of termination at the rates set forth under Articles III and VI herein, less prior interim payments, if any. Upon payment of such sums, the COUNTY shall be discharged from all liability to the CONTRACTOR hereunder and this contract shall terminate on October 1, + 1987,unless extended in writing by mutual agreement between the parties hereto. B. Upon termination of the contract under Paragraph "A" above, all documents, records j file materials and equipment shall be turned over to the COUNTY by the CONTRACTOR. C. All services to be rendered under this contract shall be subject to the direction and approval of the COUNTY. i X. ASSIGNMENT OF CONTRACT The CONTRACTOR shall not assign this contract in whole or in part, nor shall the CONTRACTOR subcontract any of the work to be performed hereunder without prior written . consent of the COUNTY. XL INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR The CONTRACTOR shall at all times be an independent contractor and not an employee of the COUNTY, and shall not be entitled to compensation or benefits of any kind except as specifically provided for herein. XII. AMENDMENT The COUNTY shall make changes within the scope of this contract by giving notice to the CONTRACTOR and subsequently confirming such changes in writing. If such changes affect the cost of, or the time required for performance of the contract, and appropriate ' adjustment shall be made. No change by CONTRACTOR shall be recognized without written approval of the Director of Public Works. Nothing in this article shall excuse the CONTRACTOR from proceeding with performance of the contract as changed hereunder. XIII. CONTENT AND UNDERSTANDING This contract contains the complete and integrated understanding, agreement or negotiation whether oral or written not set forth herein or in written amendments hereto duly executed by both parties. i I 3 4 r, 7 a f XIV. ATTORNEYS' FEES If the COUNTY brings any action or suit relating to the enforcement of this contract or asking for any relief against the CONTRACTOR, declaratory or otherwise, arising out of this contract or if CONTRACTOR brings any action or suit against the COUNTY for the f enforcement of the contract or asking for any relief against the COUNTY, declaratory or otherwise, arising out of this contract, then the prevailing party in any of these events shall be paid it's reasonable attorneys' fees and costs and expenses extended or incurred in connection with any such suit or action. i XV. CONFLICT OF INTEREST The CONTRACTOR heraby affirms that he has no present or contemplated future personal t interest in the property, which is the subject matter of this contract. XVI. GOVERNING LAW This contract and the rights and obligations of the parties hereunder shall be governed by the laws of the State of Washington. XVII. II AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE 1 In performing the services defined herein, the CONTRACTOR shall report to: Robert Nesbitt Jefferson County Engineer E 1820 Jefferson St. Port Townsend, WA 98388 (208) 385-3505 The CONTRACTOR'S authorized representative and address is: _ John Corey i Star Route 1 Box 1872 1 Forks, WA 98331 ! (208) 374-5118 I XVIII. { NOTICES Any notice given by either party to the hereunder shall be served, if delivered in i 1 4 person, to the office of the representative authorized and designated in writing to act for the respective party, or if deposited in the mail, properly stamped with the required postage and addressed to the office of such representative as indicated in Schedule "A". Either party hereto shall have the right to change any representative or address it may have given to the other party by giving such other party due notice in writing of such change. XIX. CONFLICT WARRANTY The CONTRACTOR warrants that he has not employed or retained any company, firm or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for him, to solicit or secure this contract, and that he has not paid or agreed to pay any company, firm or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for him any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gifts or any other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award of making this contract. For breach or violation of this warranty, the COUNTY shall have the right to annul this contract without liability. APPROVAL OF CONTRACT This contract shall become effective upon written approve the County of Jefferson. Executed this 7 ? day of a?-G 1J .1986. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ?lZL6l/d--? Larry ennison, Chairman B. G. Brown, Member 5 EXHIBIT "A" - ! J vegetation management ® NORTHWEST COALITION for ALTERNATIVES to PESTICIDES P.O. BOX 1393 EUGENE, OREGON 97440 (503) 344.5044 Febru p i R O V E D Carter Breskin Jefferson County Dept. of Public Works FEB 13 1987 Jefferson County Courthouse Port Townsend, Wa. 98368 JEFFERSOiN E.,OUN i Y ENGINEEFM OFFICE Dear Carter: Lane County is beginning a review of their roadside vegetation management policy. Currently, the roadsides are managed without the use of herbicides. We are greatly interested in gathering cost comparisons from other counties that use little i or no herbicides along their rights-of-way. Although we need accurate estimates, we are not requesting extraordinary - precision, se this questionnaire can be completed quickly. We are particularly interested in the following questions: 1. How many miles do you maintain?447 2. How many miles of shoulder do you mow each year? In general, how many times do you mow the shoulders each year? 900 .So??/? •n?/a ?• I mP?.?X •.?dir?ss 3. What is the cost of mowing the shoulder? PleAse indicate if the cost is per acre or per mile. 4. Approximately how many miles per year do you brush cut? i 5. What is the cost range of brush cutting per mile or acre? 6. How many miles do you treat manually each year? How much per { shoulder mile do you spend for manual brushing? 7. What species do you control with manual brushing? 8. What is your total vegetation management budget? Capital costs? -az-e - ce?fJ; Vegetation Management activities? 9. Do you contract out any jobs? If so, which ones? `7Lo 10. Please fill out the following chart for any labor group that your county works with and indicate which job is performed: Grou : Job: work release? u` ?odcp?? - / youth crews? / community service? ., h ? ot er t 11. Is this cost-effective? Arta 4 ejCcGu.o?p ? oP ?7.'a`x??w• 79tvrrs?s-a Cs.?G ? ?oczc? 6.1? . GtPL ? ?.c?or-X «.c? abs gZL?a?++ ? ee G G ^ c y G?a- -ro _ ? w ?a.r an u?c u- 4+ 7 l7. Has a systematic survey been undertai:::n of your county's roads for: a) treatment needs? .10"?' b) long term plans? 4Lar -" /979 c) evaluation of present management techniques? ., 6_ /979 13. Do you eliminate any roadsides from treatment? If so, what criteria do you use to make that determination? _A4 - We very much appreciate your cooperation in taking the time - to answer this questionnaire. I will be phoning you next week to talk with you about your responses. Thank you very much. Sincerely, Mary O'Brien Information Coordinator h + L? attachment ?.l L?nv IbL' i1i? ?i 4Ike ; 7 A JEFFERSON COUNTY COUXI-110l!SF. i1"y Jefferson County BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Port Townsend, Washington 98368 • Phone (206) 385.2016 v LARRY V!. DF.NNI50 N, pIBTRICT 1 B.G. BROWN, DISTRICT 2 JOHN L. PITTS, DISTRICT 3 I September 15, 1986 1 Mr. Lowell Larson, President Toandos Peninsula Association, Inc. 593 Camp harmony Road Quilcene, Wa. 98376 I Dear Mr. Larson, Thank you for your letter of September 9, 1986 alerting us to the growing problem with Tanacetum vulgare (tansy ragwort), on the Toandos Peninsula. We have forwarded a copy of your letter to the Jefferson County Cooperative Extension Office located in the Post Office Building here in Port Townsend (385-3581). Cooperative Extension has information on dealing with this problem and should be forwarding that on to you. We have also given a copy of your letter to our Public Works Department so they will be aware, and can take action to deal with this weed on the County Road right-of-way. Please let us know if we can be of further assistance in this matter. Sincerely, JEFFERSON COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS 'a 4 o I' ry j. ennas n, Chairman I { B. BrBwn,' Member BOCC/ld j ° ? jJ q 115. L?,.,E I ?/ SEP 17 1986 J[E€ FE<<aGN f -,-ENTY ENGINEERS GFFiC' _J JEFFERSON COUNTY COURTHOUSE NATIONAL HISTORIC SITE PORT TOWNSEND. WASHINGTON September 11, 1986 Jefferson County Department of Public Works COURTHOUSE FORT TOWNSEND. WASHINGTON 98368 TEL. (206)385-3505 j GARY A. ROWE, 014FIECTOR Cha SmLth Western WashLngton ToxLcs CoaLLtLon 4516 UnLversLty Way Northeast SuLte #6 Seattle, WashLngton 98105 Dear Cha: ThLs year's brush cuttLng cost fLgures averaged $400 per mLLe, wLth a Low of $287/mL and a hLgh of $665/mL. Mowing averaged $23/mL, and we mowed 336.6 mLLes. 1 do not have the total mLLes brush cut at thLs tLme. I have yet to receLve the summer manuaL buttLng mLLeage and cost fLgures, as the supervLsor has not yet turned Ln hLs report. Please check wLth me Later on that. i Hope thLs Ls what you needed. ALL fLgures LncLude fLaggers, northwest services council May 13, 1986 ? I' 1 01 EMPLOYMENT PROGRAM JOB DESCRIPTION JOB TITLE: Vegetation Management HOST AGENCY: Jefferson County Dept. Public Works ADDRESS: Courthouse Port Townsend, WA 98368 SUPERVISOR: William Arey County Road Super. PHONE NO.: 385-3505 or 385-0890 WORK SITE: Selected County Roads NUMBER IN CREW: '8-10 WAGE: $3.35/hr, 40 hrs/wk SCHEDULE: 7:00 AM to 3:30 PM Monday thru Friday I. SUMMARY OF JOB A. GENERAL ______-__? -P„„ +ha nnntrol 2. Work independently in recognizing and determining treatment for problem areas. Make effective, coherant suggestions for innovative treatment. III. A. MATERIAL PROVISION No materials required. B. EQUIPMENT PROVISIONS Chain saws, hand saws, machete, provided by Department of Public Works. C. JOB SITE TRANSPORTATION NEEDED n Transportation to job site provided by Department of Public i Works vehicle. Transportation to Hadlock Shop site not provided. D. CONTINGENCY` PLANS With the exception of high winds, this work may be i y performed in any weather. In high wind situations work in and around the Hadlock Shop will be accomplished. J E. ON-SITE TRAINING AND FORMAL TRAINING Will be taught to recognize desirable and undesirable plant species; sight distance requirements for road approaches and intersections and signs; contour control for potential erosion problems. Basic, practical landscaping. F. ADDITIONAL PROVISIONS I Heavy duty work clothes, boots and gloves. Rain gear. j William Arey, 3rupdrvisor Date 1 • 7 } l -. I 77 HOST AGENCY: Jefferson County Department NO. JTPA PARTICIPANTS TO of Public Works BE EMPLOYED ON PROJECT: Two ADDRESS: Courthouse NO. SUPERVISORS: One or two Port Townsend, WA 98368 depending upon crew size SUPERVISOR: William Arey SCHEDULE: 7:00am to'3:30pm County Road Superintendent Monday through Friday PHONE NUMBER: .385-3505 or 385-0890 PROJECT START/END DATES: Indeterminate 1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION j A. GENERAL t { Work is routine vegetation managment, also testing theories of i establishment of plant communities and the validity of non-use l of herbicides and various manual control techniques. B. PROJECTED WORK ACTIVITIES AND SCHEDULE - Results of the program will be through long-term observance of accomplished manual control and plant community establishment. Schedule is indeterminate. f Ii. PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS A. OCCUPATIONAL JOB SKILLS 1. Proper and safe use of machete, hand and chain saws. Identification of specific problem areas. 2. Identification of potential problem sites, with special j 1 1 attention to erosion control and public safety. training provided T, VEGETATION aANAGEMENT REPORT 1985 the five functions of vegetation management, pulling tree tr In 1y85 , ditches, machine mowing, machine brush cutting, of Jefferson 479 tained 1 i th 1 n e manual brush cutting ma In addition to at a total cost of $179,036-39. County roads ee ing and traffic , p an.tual personnel and equipment costs, machine sw e plicable. The only personnl cost e a h p er whose control cost were included w f the road superintendent William Arey, l y not factored was that o f activities make apportionment of his time extreme any i n wide variety o difficult, and it was not thought to be a great enough factor tual costs per mile of of these functions to substantially alter the ac work. The cost of pulling, ditches is included because of serious f non-herbicide methods of question raised regarding the effects o of the roadway. Because the build control in this particular area in of sod has resulted in some areas (perhaps ast the i " p n of a thick layer part to a lack of comprehensive ditch maintenance programs h cost of this form hi bl g e 20 years), we are concerned about the possi shoulder mile was cost of $522.40. , of maintenance. In 1964, a ith 179 shoulder miles ditched. In 1985, a cost of ditched . eaiculated, w $387.80/shoulder mile was calculated, with 200 shoulder miles is the ence differ gr However, factor that may influence reporrt to r not accuracy o of mileage reporting d superintendent). mileage at the time; mileage is charted by the roa ile contrasts markedly with Clallam The figure of $387.80/shoulder m 71/should miles, which is due in part to a f $1285 h I I . aps County's 1984 cost o much higher rental rater than Jefferson County. is per Athey Loader has increased h ; e reasonable to speculate that the use of t ditching operation to some extent. The total the efficiency of the cost of ditching for 1985 is $77,560.60. The number of shoulder miles machine mowed is 1,290; 40 of these county. The large number of h e shoulder miles in the west end of t the fact that many roads are mowed three times during 1985 is t o miles is due The total cost of machine mowing for the mowing season. for 1984 are not available for comparison. $44,426.94. Figures Eighty-one shoulder miles were maintained 01 pthesmachine miler. 8 3, cutter for a total cost of $24,667. 1984 are not available for comparison. Figures for Tree trimming was done for 30 shoulder miles, at a cost of This is our costlies t $20,371.96, or $679.06/shoulder mile. does not have to be repeated but d , ure, vegetation management proce interval that mowing or brush cutting requires. the y " '?'c? w l G" J S 1W. wu?x i As we have in the past four summers, we utilized "outside" personnel for manual brush cutting. Only one crew was used, with one supervisor, John Sheehan (his field report is included as a separate f item in this report) and four crew members. Two of these members were referrals through the Juvenile Diversion Program of the Superior 1 Court. Twenty-eight shoulder miles were manually cut at a total cost of $11,809.06; cost per shoulder mile of $421.75• The future as well as present benefits to the youths employed (two of whom were paying restitution costs) must be taken into consideration. The program of hiring disadvantaged youths through various programs is one of mutual - benefit for Jefferson County and the youths. I The road superintendent, William Arey, has expressed satisfaction with the ditching program and its cost effectiveness, but believes that the brush cutting program requires the addition of another brush cutting machine . He recommends the use of a soil sterilant for the entire shoulder of the road, but also expresses his concern that the public relations difficulties arising out of a renewed herbicide program may well be more costly and time consuming than continuing the policy of "no-spray". This is the first year when reliable computer-generated figures for the vegetation management program have been available. Because of the wide disparity between counties regarding mowing, brush-cutting, ditching, etc., it is advisable that Jefferson County not compare itself with other counties, but, rather, if the non-herbicide maintenance program is determined to be of continued benefit to the people and environment of Jefferson County, it should be continued and ' r encouraged. VEGETATION CREl4_,Lll'L'RV1501 `; dUC.`iTI'ONNAII:E 1. Were there Lou many/loo I'or% person:. on the crew? - 2. Were the working how•., loo Long? 3. Did the age :,prcacl cunlrLbul'e to a bet't'er working attLtude? -Yes nu Would you LLke to ,ec more age spread? 3. What were there contrLbuL-ing causes of any accidents? S. Were there atLLLude pruhLcros? I What were the general. re.o,ons? ' 6.. Is more traLnLng of `iupervLsors required? 7. Is more training of workers, required? 8. WouLd more contact- wLlli Hie road supervisor be heLpfuL? 9. What changes woulcl you e.uggesU Ln a future program? ?. /f/ri wN3 fl /s//LoRGSRcJcL ir?c?y9t? /J %'i ° -Tpf?TlM4 r?, Lq t //i? o U/' TU /S /'"16"CL 911E GE'? b ? Z . /VD ?Cti: l f emu/ ?usTA Fw /£?? CE 1A, £"'C"'1 1* emu.'/ Fr . 13-17y ?F' c,uu)Afri/f?uz 1141) /J w/Uf/z.1cr ?P['fAO, b?? //AD ?, I3 -1,e. ezoS /+/f %f/T?/%r SAS q3) ?/ f1 TE!/ ?' ll GN 7 lAf? 9£ TJ/NT f??i?l7//ZE? /g U ?JCCl ti/r/L -? c f/.?.?T wz ?9D cNIS 7;t= To // ell) ' ,/c ovt /k ?eF / ? a' /w/fJ ufv/1%3t£ 7-5 e'ivE /?pPT-7- Pt CUiJ?i`{' f?/a/ ?.? 5c/%': s/ cl /ik' ? ?? , o . ??lvu.uTOr Sc// /3ea?;R?/a?U/Ynvf,LrrwiTf/Ti/? oewc i FAAli-r 6uAleW- ; ,4457- e441? %XcTaf ??? ifT/fla it/A7tifa v ?'D/f'ct?//?rii ?nr%DfSuY/l7?uf NfcCti?/+f:'/!1 MG/'[ jCil///te:/ l ^l j ? r. T f / L'G' i//`? `Lc/RCu err 7?c c/•X.? (l9•:) drr7f4w dfrl? cs ?laic£? f?ur;c) ?IlE rl6z? c+r 7 Ck'r { U 'u f - rc /n /f A+Sc.%?tiAf y / PucFOu F L? , ?n+£eG? vcY /Ci/).fft cs ` 1 /lIluDtf!?G' O ? 0 ' + 'l ? 4. if f +? + 1» OR4.. /NFUR 7. NG) 5?lfeW)o,Q5 CA/1 Jlljly cU 7'/115, n14,7- A 179CWI (ail'/J£/h/1NDrCYa \&S . 1 , C???h r,/'/ AOiQuAI?. ?ca/?y?c,arus eA1(1 lk/AL) IOJA?r 041K 156-1!273 IX/ $•EAr,177,141 P,,f/!/ffiZ,,X• J re Fp its, ?IaP.000.c?y Ccc.Q /ir'=? '? l??!L'?,/1 /•rrilT Tw's.(izc.? ?3? ?ilsrvrir_ G?'u.'r'r c.` ? { 1 _ i i I ,., f^1 Jefferson County Veretati)n Control rroject Supervisors' Project Report Attn. Brian Shelton; Carter Braskin; William Arey 9/5/84 1. Cre., size was satis:'aetory. We found that it requires the full time att,:ntion of one supervisor per 5 to 7 youth workers (adults obviously require minimal supervision). 2. Since we had 1 to i2' r hr. travel time we were comfortable with the 8 hour day. If we had had the crew working only 10 or 15 minuits fro m we the shop, loan might HAVE RaCO&pIEj4DW A 7 hour day, especially for the 13 yr. olds. r I 3. The wide age spread wa had was a tremendous asset on the job and we think in terms of the total effectiveness of the J.D. program. i i 4. Most of our accidents wer: caused by; inattention, carelessness, frustration, fasigue, extremely difficult terrain, and emoyional problems. ..f 5. Possiole causes of Qttituda problems a) p.y inequities (roal or perceived) t b) S.,rious home/social problems that spill over onto the job. ` c) Ti;e deleterious effects of drugs or drug hangovers. 1 d) Ono individual vrar on the job who didn't want to be there b,t felt coerced, and a.; a result took it out on the crew. 6. You can't possibly teach all the skills needed in a short period. { Jeff. C,,. VuL. Control Project Report Cont. { n", /.. Trai:in; sh,,uld be cart cl' the supervisor's job discriPtion. Obvir.usly tt_o more time that can effectively be spent training P I than. kids and onhancin; their basic t job }kills the more value"- _ t they beeoo:e over the lcn; run (and more important the more of an a_:set they become the community). One fundamental aspect of t...o program that might be stressed to future supervisors is that kids learn best by example, and the most important examples are good work habits: effectiveness, efficiency, and safety. 8. Over the entire program we had excellent rapport and access to Bill ,trey and the entire staff of the county shop. It was a plea:,ure to work witL tna hilp,.ul and pleasant people who obviously went out of their way Lo insure the success of the program. It was especially helpful. to have the assistance of Jerry Clemens whiff,, we were working on the Dosewallips R. road. We think that i simi.iar coordination oetween the regular county employees (who ' work a particular d.ibt.ri?t) and the crew supervisors is desirable. 9. We ti.ink that in the fu Lure it might be helprul to prepare some tool:., helmets, vests vitt, in-itching numbers so that each individual coulu be assigned ini.tia). equipment, and held responsible for it. Glov„> (at least ono set) should be provided by the county ( with t replneoments available at cost perhaps). s At tr.a vary least the youths should be paid twice monthly. Them: should be two funeLionnl chain saws available to the project. A racto for one of tt:e crew vehicles might be helpful in an emergency. L_ >? lid VEGETATION CREW SUPERVISOR'S QUESTI(ONNAIRE 1. Were there too many/too few persons on the crew? 2. Were the workLng hours too Long? 3. DLd the age spread contrLbute to a better workLng attLtude? yes no WouLd you LLke to see more age spread? j 4. What were there contrLbutLng causes of any accidents? L, 5. Were there attLtude probLems? What were the general reasons? i 6. Is more traLning of supervLsors requLred? I . 7. Is more traLnLng of workers requLred? 8. Would more contact wLth the road supervLsor be heLpfuL? i 1 9. What changes would you suggest Ln a future program? p I i i i i •. i 1:` ' r MAINTENANCE . TECHNICAL Washington State BULLETIN Department of Transportation NO T-03-15-001 MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS GROUP August 1981 Hiqhway Administration Building Olympia, Washington 98504 ROADSIDE MANAGEMENT ZONES j Roadsides are divided into three zones reflecting specific roadside management 1 objectives. Not all "zones" occur on every highway. Zone 1 is referred to as the "bare earth Zone". This zone begins at the edge of the pavement and generally extends outward to the bottom of the ditch or to the outside edge of the free draining ballast which supports the pavement. Zone 1 generally varies in width from 2 feet to 8 feet. The management objective in this zone is to ensure rapid drainage of water from the roadway surface and the free draining subsurfacing. Zone 2, identified as the "Operational Zone," begins at the outside edge of Zone 1. it I , extends outward to a point somewhere within the right of way' encomoa-t " ,k- portion of the right of wav -hirh ti- ...,:---- , r northwest services council ONE HUNDRED AND ONE PROSPECT STREET. SUITE TEN IP.O.BOX2009) BELLINGHAM. WA 98227 1206)6714660 MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT (206)0931828 Authorized under the Job Training Partnership Act (JTPA, PL 97-300), r and by the Northwest Services Council. 1 _TEFFERSUN COUNTy----------------------- hereinafter referred to as the HOST AGENCY, assures and certifies the NORTHWEST SERVICES COUNCIL, hereinafter referred to as the SPONSOR, that: The HOST AGENCY makes the following assurances and certifications: a. It will comply with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 USC 2000d). b. It will not in any way discriminate against, deny benefits to, deny employment to, or exclude from participation any persons on the grounds of race, color, national origin, religion, age, sex, handicap or political affiliation or belief. C. The work activity does not involve political activity. d. Participants in the program will not be employed on the construction, operation or maintenance of that part of any facility which is used for religious instruction or worship. e. Appropriate standards for health and safety in work and training situations will be maintained and all Federal and Washington State Regulations governing the employment of Minors will be observed. Ir f. THE PROGRAM WILL NOT RESULT IN THE DISPLACEMENT OF EMPLOYED WORKERS OR IMPAIR EXISTING CONTRACTS FOR SERVICES OR RESULT IN THE SUBSTITUTIONS OF FEDERAL FUNDS FOR OTHER FUNDS IN CONNECTION WITH WORK THAT WOULD OTHERWISE BE PERFORMED. It will submit reports as required by the Sponsor and will report to lI the Sponsor, as required, the time worked and the work assessment of participants, and shall keep copies of all time records. L The PARTICIPANT(S) assigned by the Sponsor to the Host Agency: a. Are not in any sense to be considered Federal, State or City employees within the meaning of the law administered by the U.S., State or City _I Civil Service Commission and will not have recourse to the Federal Tort Claims Act when employed by a Federal Agency or acting on behalf of the Host in the official capacity. b. Shall, within the range of duties and hours of work fixed and/or approved by the Sponsor, be assigned duties by the Host Agency and shall be required to perform the duties in the manner specified by the Host Agency. C. Shall have the following provided by the Host Agency: 1. On-site training, technical direction and daily supervision; 2 Office space, supplies, equipment and other working tools and facilities necessary for the performance of their assignment, if not otherwise provided. 3. Reimburse for transportation for duties performed in their work assignment, if not otherwise provided. 4. Work release time for participation in other approved training activities, including employability development training and job search activities. LOCALOFFICES. 107 E STH 1002 LAWRENCE FORKS PRAIRIE PLAZA PORT ANGELES. WA 98782 PORT TOWNSEND. WA 98768 FORKS, WA 98771 452.8202 085.5578 774.6850 EMPLOYMENT & TRAINING PROGRAMS 01, d. Shall meet. Host Agency standards as to qualification to operate its equipment. The Host Agency shall be the sole judge of the qualifications of the participant in this respect. e. Supplies, equipment and other working tools. and facilities provided by ' the Host Agency for the purpose of this agreement shall not be the responsibility of the Sponsor and the Sponsor will not be responsible for damage or loss resulting from any cause. f. On request of the Host Agency, the Sponsor will reassign or terminate the assignment of participant(s) provided by the Sponsor. In the event that a dispute arises between the Host Agency and the participant, the Sponsor should be notified by either party. The Sponsor will attempt to arbitrate the dispute before any formal appeal process is initiated. If the situation, covered by JTPA Law or regulations, is not settled to the satisfaction of both parties, and the Host Agency initiates or continues the dispute against the participant, the participant may initiate the JTPA appeal process with the Grant Recipient/Administrative Entity. The Host Agency assures and certifies that, if upon written notification from the Sponsoring Agency of non-compliance with any of the above assurances or certifications, it will take necessary action within ten (10) days to correct the non-compliance or cease participation in the agreement per the written notification. The duration of employment for any participant is limited to the duration i of their current program. This agreement shall be valid for the placement of participants until September 30, 1987. ' I The obligation of any party hereto may be terminated by the party upon ten (10) days notice in writing to the other party, said notice to be computed from date of mailing. HOST AGENCY:__ JEFF.CRSQk CD.VN-U----------------------------------- Name of Organization COURTHOUSE PORT TOWNSEND, WA 98368 ---- ------------------------------------------ AdCity Zip Code dress '+ ? -------------------------- --- -- ------ Signature of Authorized Representative CHAIRMAN BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ---------------------------------------------------- Title Date SPONSORING AGENCY: Northwest Services Council. i ---------------------------------------------------- Signature of Authorized Representative Gay Dubigk, Executive Director 1 YG (5, ET,q T ! In c rr?r-r e )4 EX AcRU'hCNT MC17 P R o G R R-m , -X,rPEa, mE/>!% /yJUYaITdRJ ??rJRr'03/_ >Q D? tCfiH1/NE r=r? CL7 _ ON_. ©n!-Gl{E/Y? BOA ?S,D C v£G E7Ti4Tcd+r Gc?nTepL i__ '. ;;lw_: m vn f Tom. R ? mov>4L/c.d? TP-JL PR ©cE.Arle?. ?• 2. , m oyf , . r v?2 R € ? Aai j r _ off ' u At I 04 ( CL.) L.,4-7-,E ' (2,O S :r or- P R (D 4; l?A t _ _. . . /. 4-t3 o R_ C o s Z-S _ _ QL),.p i m7-. Cots -/--E:> 3• _. _ C.cTriT_25 . ..iTl?1.t.TV2!N,G.iArnrTEvkuc? h c1Y Gc?rt P? c Thy- 13Y _ .:_ ?°' E .-t?2O G? lZ><?-ry1 4/v,4/-Ys/s> . ! .; i Gp-rtT/2 DL d? 2oA,D S,DE _ vEv, r Ti9--T?o?? ?H-Y,r=s7 _ _ I s L..r R 8-- C e- o-?h SEND a- b. Pµo, G/v7-ATrOvi Ox _"r3EFdR? ffFrC ?o„cdr+?/T?o d7OGUM DOG J ryLC NT-A -r/a-"l of R Efn ROW-; 4 . ?rv,4-nr?.E vR?. ?l?GurY,a n/ r,9- ria111 mr4,fv 7 - C - ) WjF_/v 7" $V . In744 - L--,a. s. STVr?/c D? ?ozDcPulZ i 1r=s, WH,4T In 0-111'r H y M O-'t 17-0l n1? o? C i` A-RC,45, -'D P- i66, Par4-f< G.20Li /N 6r SaA,sc),YS_ Y?10"/-ORIAt G .pv?ln,Gi i S.E 4-5 C!, g ^5 ti/C?DEs>/a/?E?Tt=7 i 1 rEdati qc, Fa ,e xv a , x 3 ^r r , . f ?e?ak, ,-w,NSyr ?t., ,'TT ll1m3eJ-11p, l,t r >t . 41!1 ,?a No spraying `<`J 1 n7 Rbs u6. 2a. o i ROADSIDE VEGETATION MANAGEMENT WITHOUT HERBICIDES JEFFERSON COUNTY, WASHINGTON By Blair F. Wolfley, Area Extension Agent What is Jefferson County's Roadside Vegetation Management Program? Many individuals have summarized the Jefferson County Roadside Management Program simply as a "no spray" program. Although the Jefferson County Commissioners declared a moratorium on roadside spraying in 1978, to describe this effort simply as "no spray" underestimates the overall program objective and the complexity of its achievement. The moratorium and revised vegetation control program was the beginning of a county effort to reduce chemical usage in areas draining toward private wells and to reduce county exposure for damage claims alleged to result from chemical application along county road right-of-ways. The present roadside vegetation management system being applied in Jefferson County is based on a 1979 consultant report from Dr. Roger del Moral of the University of Washington Department of Botany.l The primary goal of the program as outlined by del Moral is to produce relatively stable plant communities which require little maintenance and which possess other desirable traits. Program application is intended to accomplish the following six general goals: 1. To economically insure the efficient and safe operation of roads; G 2. To produce naturalized vegetation on the right-of- way that is self-sustaining and which blends into the surrounding vegetation; 3. To control erosion from slopes and cutbanks; 4. To produce an aesthetically pleasing right-of-way; 5. To provide cover for desirable species of wildlife; and 6. To reduce the opportunities for the migration and distribution of undesirable weeds. 1del Moral, Roger, Ecological Control of Roadside Vegetation, October 24, 1979, Jefferson County Public Works Department, Port Townsend, WA, 98368, 31 pages. Dr. del Moral has made recommendations for control and elimination of problem or invasive plant species. His recommendations have not included the use of herbicides as a primary method to control or manage roadside vegetation. Thus the term "no spray" program. PRESENT APPLICATION. The current Jefferson County roadside Vegetation Management Program is a mix of seven techniques which are applied in varying degrees depending upon specific vegetation problems. These techniques include: mowing, manual control, mechanical brush cutting, air sawing, grading, application of soil sterilants, and hydro-seeding. r Mowing. The use of mechanical mowers to control grass and immature woody vegetation is the most widely used management technique in the county's program. Virtually all county road shoulders and accessible backslopes are mowed. The mowing has proven relatively successful. The mowing ? controls many young woody Plants and annual weeds. The grassy shoulders are aesthetically pleasing when mowed, and the mowing seems to stimulate spreading of the grass, which _ helps to control erosion and provides competition for weedy species. Drawbacks to mowing include necessary repetition when grasses are actively growing and the necessity to make multiple passes with the mower when shoulders are uneven and/or have steep drainage ditches. The invasion of low spreading grasses and weeds into asphalt pads is an additional problem. _ Mechanical Brush Cutting Brush cutting has been used extensively along county roads where brushy species create a problem of limited visibility and/or encroachment toward the asphalt or gravel surface. Operation of the brush cutter is a slow and expensive process. Machinery I1 maintenance costs are high. Some aesthetic problems have J resulted from brush cutting operations, especially when cutting is done near rural residences and private drives where individuals prefer the "green look". Rapid regrowth resulting in a greening effect usually relieves any browning or tree scarring effects of the brush cutter. Brush cutting needs can usually be met with annual treatment. "Air Saw". The "air saw" which is a long-armed saw used from an aerial bucket, has been used to trim back lateral limb growth and excessive heights of alder and fir growing on backslopes and right-of-ways. Alder seems to be a major problem because of its tendency to grow toward the f ?M open space of the county roads. Use of the "air saw" and accompanying chipper is slow and expensive. A crew of five to six people, which includes flag personnel, is required for the operation. Safety of operation crew is a major consideration. Use of the "air saw" has been relatively effective, but without complete removal of many of the mature trees, the operation must be repeated approximately every other year. In many problem areas, a considerable portion of the work is done by power and phone line crews doing line maintenance on service lines adjacent to county roads. The major portion of county roads are not closely bordered by mature stands of alder and/or fir and thus do not require the "air saw" operation. Manual Control. Manual control has been employed as a means of cutting back and pulling invasive problem plants such as alder, salmonberry, and blackberry. In the three years previous to 1982, Jefferson County applied the technique of manual control to a total of 75 centerline miles. The work was contracted to private professional crews at an average cost of $240.00 per centerline mile. The work was satisfactory but appears that it must be repeated on a limited basis every two to three years until competing vegetation essentially chokes out the problem species. No estimation is available as to the length of time necessary to achieve this result. Manual control is considered by the county as the most effective long-term means of control in many situations (i.e. fir, cedar, hemlock). Employment of high school summer help in the 1982 season indicates that the job of hand thinning and selective t elimination of problem species requires a significant amount of training to insure the use of proper selective cutting and thinning techniques. The hiring of local citizens meets with community support as a means of keeping county dollars in the local economy. Budget limitations have severely restricted the application of the hand thinning operation during 1982. Grading. The use of grading roadside shoulders and ditches to control problem vegetation was suggested by Dr. del Moral and has been employed only as it is coherent with annual maintenance of gravel-surfaced roads and drainage ditches. Major drawbacks in using grading for vegetation control include deterioration of shoulder berms with continued grading and increased erosion from loosened soil. Concern for increased turbidity of runoff water into lakes and streams has been expressed by fisheries personnel. County road department personnel view grading as a physical maintenance operation and not as a vegetation control measure. Soil Sterilants. Dr. del Moral addressed the prcblem of grass and weed encroachment along roadway edges. His conclusion was that in situations where no vegetation is desired there were "no ecological means to achieve this goal", del Moral suggested that limited spraying with chemicals other that 2-4-D and the use of soil sterilants may still be required. g In an effort to eliminate the encroachment of spreading grasses and weeds along and under the immediate edge of asphalt surfaces, the county experimented in 1981 with the herbicide Karmex. A one-foot sterilant strip was sprayed on roadway shoulders immediately adjacent to asphalt edges. This process eliminated the majority of grass and weed problems. Problem weeds not eliminated were plantain and dandelion. Fall 1982 and spring 1983 spraying will incorporate the use of a chemical called Krovar, which is expected to effect a better kill on plantain and dandelion. Hydro-seeding. Hydro-seeding has been used on new road construction areas where disturbed soils, cutbanks, and - ba.kslopes have been left bare of vegetation. Hydro- seeding is a process of high-pressure applications of a grass seed and mulch slurry. Although hydro-seeding is relatively new for Jefferson County, it appears very satisfactory in eliminating, through competition, the problem vegetation, especially alder. A SUMMARY OF THE PROGRAM. Perhaps the greatest immediate fault with the current vegetation control program is its apparent inability to l control problem weeds. Prior to 1982, the county had attempted to control the most undesirable weeds, such as Tansy Ragwort, with spot hand-pulling. In 1982, with Tansy Ragwort intermittently scattered along most county roads, the road department under sever budget problems was forced to abandon the hand-pulling of the problem Tansy. At present, the weed problem outside the one-foot sterilant { buffer and beyond the reach of the mower has been ignored. In defense of this action, three factors are significant. First, Jefferson County has not activated a weed control district and thus no legal obligation exists. Second, a high percentage of county roads are remote and far removed from agriculture production areas. A third factor is that the del Moral program suggests that weed problems will be brought under control as desirable vegetation eventually established. fished. This Is Y expected to be a long-term process and existing weeds will eventually be eliminated. s } In summary, the Vegetation Management Program for Jefferson County can be described as a program in transition. Many of the "no spray" efforts have proven successful at least on a short-term basis. It must be remembered that the establishment of a stable, low maintenance vegetation along county roads is a long-term process. This process will theoretically require a greater investment in early years with maintenance costs tapering off as the control vegetation establishes and maintenance becomes less. Techniques such as mechanical brush cutting and "air sawing" would be necessary with herbicide programs as well as "no spray". The term "no spray" has become a popular descriptor of the vegetation control effort. "No spray" also appears in transition. The one-foot sterilant buffers are an exception to a strict "no spray" program; however, not an unexpected exception according to del Moral's report. County Commissioners express the moratorium on spraying not as a ban on future application of herbicides, - but as a time to rethink the process and review the alternatives; a time to determine areas where herbicides can be used when necessary without endangering nearby domestic water sources and gardens. At present, the Public Works Department is planning a, classification of county road segments by acceptable and/or necessary vegetation control method. Many of the experimental efforts suggested by del Moral's study have yet to be tested. Budget constraints will undoubtedly dictate a long-term selective process of applying these alternatives. At present, the overall Vegetation Management Program might be termed an experimental effort. Although the majority of county residents seem very supportive of the effort, Jefferson County is not advertising the effort as "the way" for other counties to go in vegetation management. The benefit/cost ratio for the program appears to be acceptable at present. Budget constraints may curtail some efforts in the future and necessitate a review of the alternatives. In summary, Jefferson County's program is like every other county's. We are all trying to do a better job to keep more people happy for less money. JEFFERSON COUNTY COURTHOUSE NATIONAL HISTORIC SHE PORI TOWNSEND. WASHINGTON ?l Jefferson County i Department of Public Works COURTHOUSE PORT TOWNSEND, WASHINGTON 98368 TEL. (206)385-3505 GARY A. ROWE, DIRECTOR May 1, 1986 Pleasant Tides Property Owner's Association P.O. Box 91 Brinnon, WA 98320 ATTN: Mr. Jack F. Griffiths, President Dear Mr. Griffiths, Our apologies for taking so long to respond to your letter of February 5, 1986. Mr. Arey, Road Superintendent, thought that I had responded to your letter and I thought Mr. Arey had responded. Jefferson County does not spray county road rights of way. We maintain vegetation by mechanical and manual means. Mr. Arey informs me that your area is scheduled for shoulder grading and ditching in the fall of this year. This function should eliminate the encroaching vegetation. Mechanical brush cutting and mowing will be subsequent to grading and should keep the vegetation under control. Pleasant Tides Property OwnersI Association P. 0. Box 91 Brinnon, Washington 98320 February 5, 1986 k f Mr. William Arey Supt. of Roads Jefferson County Public Works Department County Courthouse Port Townsend, WA 98368 Dear Mr. Arey: The Pleasant Tides Property Owners' Association would like to file a request with the Jefferson County Public Works Department for spraying of the shoulders of all roads and streets within the perimeters of the Pleasant Tides community. Our street shoulders are becoming overgrown with encroaching weeds, narrowing the driving surfaces. September 4, 1979 Pope . Talbot Port Gamble, Washington 98364 r 8ttn: Milt Philbrook Re: Herbicide Spraying in 1 Jeffezson County Dear Mr. Philbrook: Jefferson County has a moratorium on the use of herbicides. We have learned of your intent to spray your lands abutting the Eaglemount County ' Road by aerill application. The County requests that the spray runs be ?t parallel to the county road with a minimum 100 ft. set back from the right of way lines. This is to avoid drift onto,and the killing of, the established grass and vegetation that has prevented tree invasion of the shoulder and ditch areas. There is also a school bus pick up station on the road where children collect. This area must have special care ti avoid inhalation and body contact by these childred. The foregoing also applies to all county right of way until the moratorium is taken off on the use of herbicides. Your cooperation will be appreciated. Very truly yo r, I Milton L. Sanstrom, P.E. Director, Dept. of Public Works MLS:al 'a J I SAMP[? )w..1 s...i.. AI072F: !l/67J R9iB Fo/C E77Crf/ Ap> 111 STAND EXAMINATION PLOT CARD Q Nan9« 0i.t. Ne. ?'?? E.em. Na. •c - s Card NA. Of 131 l?l 7 x 1 3 6 7 ! 9 10 11 17 Ix _ x F V A a D < .S ?n° _ o s P 1 z xxx xxx x x x xx xx x xx xx xxx ! / 2G oz6 1 6" 3 00 08 S 03 /0 1160 I / A(-3 0,24 0 5-1 111 00 o6 3 O /.z l r5 s / L3 3o O 2 0o O 3 o ISO I ot(6 030 . 0 5 z DO o8 z of / O// 0/6 O y Do 07 O O 6-1 D //0 / .263 Z 6 o J 061 / off 003 00 03 0 0 C / Z43 00 0/ o z5 ZG3 4t 1 27 0/ O o/ LM . Ge u Jr o s omi l -1 1 Jefferson County Commissioners r COURTHOUSE t{r? " PORT TOW NSEN D. WASHINGTON 5183613 1.4 f I 1 ^i -i A. M. O•MEARA, D15TRICT 1, CHAIRMAN 11 CARROLL M. MERCER, DISTRICT 3 (?t B. G, BROWN, DISTRICT 2-? 1 !ST C, f_., ..-- } 5?Ly ,{y ?._- I KKK-.-'.•_GCrT -- I? I May 29, 1979 ` Mr. Charles E. Ehlert SMITH, BRUCKER, WINN & EHLERT Attorneys at Law - Fourteen Eleven Fourth Avenue Seattle, WA 98101 Dear Mr. Ehlert: Under date of May 22 you wrote to our County Engineer inquiring about County Ordinances covering roadside spraying. There is no specific Ordinance or Resolution which covers the use of roadside spraying or use of herbicides. Jefferson County does use herbicides for control of weeds along County Road rights-of-way where required. In those instances where adjacent property owners request that herbicides not be used, we request that property owner to accept certain responsibility for control of the weeds on the right-of-way. Enclosed is a copy of the Herbicide Use Exemption and Release of I Liability form which we request adjacent property owners to sign when I requesting that we not spray the right-of-way adjacent to their property. i j Very truly yours, JEFFERSON COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS A. M. O'Meara, Chairman updated list of property owners along the bush river road ?- - a _... ,..,_•. _._ _ April 2, 1979 k The following property owners along theDuckabush River Road do not want their property sprayed with herbicides and have authorized the posting of DO NOT SPRAY signs along the road on their prpperty and request that the county use mechanical rather than chemical means of controlling brush along the roadway. Section 8. Township 25 North . Range 2 W W M. 1. Andrew Mueller NW NW SW less a of Nand Tax 15 8744 18th N. W. Seattle, WA 2., Anna 8chicketanz SW NW SW, SE NW SW (S of Go. Rd.) 475'Duckabush River Rd. Brinnoa, --,WA' 98320 r, 3 ' : Stan and Candy Johnston NE NW SW $ UfA and SE NW SW (Less Tax No. 2 & S. of Rd.) ` o ' . P.O. : B x 17,6 Brinnoa, W@ : 98320,f 4. Greta Maria Bottcher East SE SW (Ptn E.. of Rd.) P.O.jBoz 1085 Ward Cove, AK 5. Ada E. Combs c/o Mrs. G.S. Combs Tax No. 2 9226 First Ave., N.E. Seattle, WA 98107 6. Frederick and Jan Shaw Eh SE SW (less ptn G. of road) Box 435 Duckabua Rive \!Rd. Brinnon, WA 9832 Section 7. Township 25 North Ranee 2 W '4! M Anna Schicketanz Lot 5 (nly 13a is pt. Tax 4, less Tax 15 & pnt nfely of of rd. 7. Larry and Judy Buck Lot 5 Iely f rd. in N 13 a) Box 47:LDuekabush River Rd. Brinnon, WA 98320 . 8. Mr, and Mrs. Robert Johnston SL NL •?? 1 , o ? Box 485 Duckabush River Rd min ! v - V . 9 Brinnon, WA 98320 9. Margaret Meyer Lot 2 (n of rd.) P.O. Box 45 Brinnon, WA 98320 /J 10.•.. Marla J. Trask Tax No. 2 / ? Box 825 Duckabush River Rd. ? p0. r a Brinnon, WA 98320 Andrew Mueller Tax 15 l?. Francis O. Medford i Roub:e.lz, Box 528-62 a ry ?` ?1ym;" WA s ?•.. , F- Section 17, Toinshi 2 NoEjk. Range 2 W W M 11. John P. Smith & Kathryn Smith Tax 12 ' 4?' P.O. Box 246 Brinnon, 4!A 98300? 12. Clara Arndt SE NE (S 4001 of MI 425 S. of Duckabush River Box 233 Duckabush River Rd. Rd.) Brinnon, WA 98320 SE NE (S 2001 of N6251 betty S. line of Rd. & N. line of River) NE SE (N of River) less Ptn Tax 2 13. Mr. and Mfrs. Gordon DuPuis Tax 1?/xys7?tt,Q?zeo Box 413 Duckabush River Rd. Brinnon, WA 9£3320 Section 16, Township 25 North Range 2 W.W.M. 15. Mr, and Mrs. George T. Thompson Wr SW NW, less E. 175 less Tax 33 Box 230 Duckabush River Rd. Brinson, WA 98320 16. Jack and Beverly Eing Tax No. 7 Box 86 Brinnon, WA 98320 17. Mr. and Mrs. Robert C. Buller Tax 16, Tax 39, and Lot #1 of Ervin P.O. Box 52 Kelly Short Plat Brinnon,>WA 98320 (Fh)-Ca,ney, Prpe,''y Yhanog c ?$ ?Zrt??/-??IJ>?r/l. P,?`,? e?iJ!? -?' 172eG? ?rtr/ir??L<cns ?.G?.,,a? fi?i2?r? Lvts ,??? j Sw vF Steh?+ 7, T 15 N. 9 a tJ i .q J T?ac?ts Rol. o !'; al Ytr. e t4r.. R;(/wn-d (YMe & dot S Blork 23, O/? v,+Pic G1no•/ 7wcts r .. 19 W, y lV(r. arld Mrs retvl ?-'YernPkQ ?3 ?ae-o ? e LJ.Qer/ 5 w, ",j anr/ (? 'a S E' S cJ n f Sr o hr r rot, 16 )5 Al, Rangy' -z t) `? l4oGer1 ?4r?? SIC' /7, Tas w iQ,.26J ,cJ?n.o C/;f'Fcrrd S? .E 5 /? .T.AS nJ, !?=??J j 1, .11, L I J iI JEFFERSON COUNTY HERBICIDE USE EXEMPTION & RELEASE OF LIABILITY r (? I? ???zoIn ?I?rS reside at Box No. a I Route No. 3 Road Name Ave- I request that no herbicides be used in area adjoining this property. h Section Township _30 _ Range. In regard to this request, I agree to the following conditions: 1. I will mark both ends of this property with clearly readable signs. p 2. I will have the area cleared of any brush, etc., which would otherwise be necessary to spray. This will be done before May 15th of each year. x 3. Should any condition arise, due to my failure to perform this work, which condition causes or contributes to any accident or injury to any person, I accept full liability, and agree to save and hold the county harmless from an- claim, or cause of , action arising out of my failure, and further agree to defend a the county in any such cause of action. u- 4. Should the brush get too big for spraying due to my neglect to cut it, I agree to pay the County to do the work for me. Signed: 'Q Date: I I/hit y 3 D I Subs ribed and sworn to before me this 3 o day of 19?Q Notary Public in d for the state of Washington r e s i di withinJefferson County - 7 - - YY I / uF 1 i I, reside at Box No.?? 7 f Route No. Road Name ?,???f- I request that no herbicides be used in area adjoining this property. Section -;FO Township _? 9 Range / ? Letter farris lumber company envelope Supplier Van Waters mqq¢ g, O.5 N u r ?' U O =4bL S•o ?: ra a.ca e0 y II j G 3 JS ?3i ? ILO >? V?cL? cJ cc 3 ? E p ae c ??? / _ _ o y ? a 1 E 1 111 a ? =L .Ct Goo G?:rvC ..... c p e`??'p ? e? 8 0. ?n a _.. .. .. ? 5 O?N n b 3 .. . .. ....., - . y aY L ?{ $:n e7 ^? ? gT? ? ?C ViW i C i v -r , _ A 9 f _ ?t 21- / f a ., i J 1 a r / , l ? ii s r i , Z f,( C U 6?- r J I Nay •/, t ncL?mc:n: ? I r is IL t 1- al u??a L t T i ? i Lv otan - Lh u? ui Let ,u io !o noL u;sh L it 1110 nave iuthc t ?-.! that oig i.; o n. "DO bu ;>o.,Lc. on''i It o L .e l i n w e c July posted :!n(.i !give been r ,movu.t by an unkno n r,ut•ty, :t hi' 1. sut•ve r_s cCfeotiv, !:,)Li.cu that, ri o11u a do not !.;u!t to .jr :: Lncu n.l.y, ?CZh.r7J ?• CXL12...? .ri. The 1,U11oubig 1.+,ln;tty uwnt:r':, ?Ir,n,; LlluDU(:kuhu:ill iiiVet' Ituad .to not, wratl. their proporLy spray,.d with herbi.cidvn turd have auLhuri.zu.l Luu pun Ling of IX) NOT SPRAY signs along the road on their pcpporty and request that Lhe county use mechunica-1 rather than chemical means of controlling brush along the roadway; Section 8, Township 25 Borth , Range 2 W.W.M, 1. Andrew Mueller NW 14W SW less R of W and Tax 15 8744 18th N.W. Seattle, WA - 2., Anna Schicketanz SW NW :;w, iE rIW SW (; .f (;U. lei.) 475 Duckabush River 10. Brinnon, WA 98320 b3. Stan and Candy Johnston NE NW SW I;ZNU- and SE NW SW (Lunn Tax No. 2 & S. of Ild.) pi P.O. Box 176 4j w B_rinnon, WA 98320 ` 4. Greta Maria Botteher East 2 SE SW (Ptn E. of Rd.) P.O. Box 1085 Ward Cove, Ali 5. Ada E. Combs c/o Mrs. ':.S. Combs 'Prix '. .. 9226 Firot Avc., rl.l':. SoaLtle, WA 98107 6. Frederick and Jan .:hau (lcua pLn N. Of t•uad) Box 435 Iluckabuoli Uvul Rd, gg (?/ 1 Brinson WA 9832Q. , - I Jeclion 7, T1 ,wnc,nip 215 1uovth Range Anna :;ch:ckut.m,z r,ot 5 (1 U,1 13a la ;)t. 'l'ax 4, loss Tax 1.5 4 pnt nfely of of rd. 7. Larry iInd •huly.Ruclc II,,,L ?. (1?:.tn alr,.ly,ol' rd. Ln it 11 it) 11ox :,79 int,•dculnirh O v. ibi. / , I t Bri.nnou, W:1 lr4's;,'O !i. dr. P.ox l,25 intuL abu:h iti.v, r iid, vl / p. Brinson, WA 9,-3, i? 9. Margaret !Icy, t' L,rt (n ,.' rd.) P.O. Box 45 Britruon, ,lii )x320 y 10. MurlU J. Bux 825 I)urlt ,Laub liiVrl' Andrew Iluollur 'Prix f5 5.. 14. Francis G. I.ladford Rout o 12, Box 528-62 Olympia, WA .i, J Section :17, Township 25 f1oxth Range 2 W 11 11 / John P. Smith & Kathryn S111 1;11 'l'ax 12 1 P.U. Box : 46 Itrinaou, Ild 'O 12. ;lure nt•,ult ? LrLC::_• C?• GI{ Nh: (:; /,Uli' „I' II !„'?? ,,. of UucL'nin,ch ;,ivr;r Lox 233 Duc.l aI eah River Rd. Raj.) Iirlnnon, WA 1,16320 GI-; NN 200' of 11625' botw S. Line of i(d. & 11, lino of ILi vor) NM 8E (N of itiver) loan Ptn Tax 2 f 13. Mr. and Mrs. Gordon DuPuis Tax 1 , r-C/?G? 6 ? [ ?•?i .111 , t : 0 Box 41.3 Duckabush River i(d. IIrinnon, 41A 9;!320 Section 16, Township 25 North , Range 2 W W M 15. Mr. and Mrs. Georhe 1'. Thompson U2 SW NWT less S. 175' leso Tax 33 Box 230 Duckabu nh River 10. - c,ti•, dA ) Brim-ii, u t (1 16. Jack car: Bevorl.y o;hig Ta:: No. 7 Bois 86 Brinnon, WA 98320 17. Mr, and Mrs. Robert C.. Buller Tax 16, Tax 39, and Lot /;l of Ervin P.O. Box 52 Kelly Short Plat Brinnon, WA 98320 -/ w / ' ? / ? ? ? l% ? ? ' -? ,., / ..? C 71. ://G r '% / ? . /?CCCI rc"JC/CiL(/,//!_G.U Ii ?./?...:'l. T y i /c (`L1rJ t/ Tr r n vr f s 7„ /n Y, b /OCf J, iycl h ba -r.( /urn/,?r l?•,rtu.i Tiui/?; /V?r. ;x'1r( I'v1rLt ("Lu'l ?'?Frn?kL . Cr'c E L i s LJ o 1 SC'r•' /Tic rnI//' in Cr'? S'-'. 5<J Q„rt LJ?, S? J 1 , J . . ?? /?; ?2h ?2 td k 1 /%, T..;fr A,/ •? ;_. i' ti Li ' A ?. Will 1113111 April 2, 1979 1 T IL ` ,i ?? .._ C??1 Ltl..il Ger.tlomenc The following property owners along theDuckabush River Road do net want their property sprayed with herbicides and have authorized the posting of DO 140T SPRAY sip s along the road on their property and request that the county use mechanic rather than chemical means of controlling brush along the roadway: Section 8, Township 25 North Range 2 W.W.M. 1. Andrew Mueller NW IJW SW less R of W and Tax 15 8744 18th N.W. Seattle, WA 2. Anna Schicketanz SW NW S11, SE NW SW (S of Co. Rd.) 475 Duckabush River Rd. Brinnon, WA 98320 3. Stan and Candy Johnston NE NW SW ?TN3s and SE NW SW (Less Tax. No, 2 & S. of Rd.) P.O. Box 176 Brinnon, WA 98320 4. Greta Maria Bottcher East 1. SE SW (Ptn E. of Rd.) P.0. Box 1085 Ward Cove, AK 5. Ada E. Combs c/o Mrs. E.S. Combs Tax No. 2 9226 First Ave., N.E. Seattle, WA 98107 6. Frederick and Jan Shaw Et SE SW (less ptn E. of road) Box. 435 Dackabush River Rd. Brinnon, WA 98320 Section 7, Township 25 North Range 2 11.W.M. Anna Schicketanz Lot 5 (nly 13a is pt. Tax 4, less Tax 15 & pat n1ely of of rd. 7. Larry and Judy Buck Lot 5 (ptn nlely of rd. in Iv 13 a) Box 475 Duckabush River Rd. Brinnon, WA 98320 8. Mr. and Mrs. Robert Johnston Box 485 Duckabush River Rd. Brinnon, WA 98320 SE NE 9. Margaret Meyer P.O. Box 45 Brinnon, WA 98320 10. Merle J. Trask Box 825 Dackabush River Rd. Brinson, 141, 98320 Andrew Mueller 14. Francis G. Medford Rout"c 12, Box 52C-62 Lot 2 (n of rd.) Tar. No, 2 D[gig EgoU[gg Tax 15 APR - 9 1979 JEFFERSON COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS Section 17, v Township 25 North an-e 2 1L 1,, John P. Smith & Kathryn Smith Tax 12 P.O. Box 246 Brinnon, WI, 95320 Clara Arndt Box 233 Duckabush River Rd SE IIE (S 4001 of N 425 S. of Duckabush River . Rd.) Brinnon, WA 98320 SE NE (S 200f of 1,16251 betty S. line of Rd. & 11. line of River) WE SE (I1 of River) less Ptn Tax 2 Mr. and Mrs. Gordon DuPuis Tar. 1 Box 413 Duckabush River Rd. Brinnon, WA 98320 Section 16, Township 25 North Ranize 2 I' P M Mr. and Mrs. George T. Thompson VJ SI•! NII, less E. 175" less Tax 33 Bor. 230 Duckabush River Rd. Brinnon, WA 98320 Mr. and Mrs.Robert Rucci S17, T2511, Range 2 W Tax 10 1790 Maranca El Cajon, CA This list will be undated as 'o ther property owners give authorization for the posting of the s;_ens. Anv of these n,.mers ?i l l nl nrll v 11-i fv +.ha+. note: please send the herbicide use exemption and release of liability form to everyone on this list Gentl 7 their i SPRAY ( rathe: 1. Andrew 41 8744 13 Seattle, 2. Anna Sch 475 Duck Brinnon, 3. Stan and P.O. Boy: Brinnon, 4. Crete Mai P.O. Box Ward Covc April 2, 1979 n: following property owners along tho0uckabush River Road do not want 'party sprayed with herbicides and have authorized the posting of D0 NOT ns along the road on their property and request that the county use mechanical aan chemical means of controlling brush along the roadway. Section 8. Townah*p 25 Piorth tanee lJ W FI, lei, I1W IN Sti less R of Wand Tax 15 N. W. etanz liti ji.: 'lll .;W (S of Co. lid.) oh itivor i;'i. 9<3? 20 ady Jnllnst•:ln ,• ,151 CKs3;i :uui .3-: IN 31.I (Less Tax ilo. 2 S. of' M.) I, 5 93320 %Ucher a:;t t;iJ (I,tn 'id.) Uf ll%y3 Seattle, WA )Y].07 6. Frederick a d Jan L;11a,. o;ys ,tn ,,. of road I Box 435 ihlckabusil iLivu,• ad, Brinnon, WA 93320 :section 7. Township 25 i orth Iiangu 7 td Anna Sch: clcotanz LoL (nly 13a 1, pt. Tax 4, Less Tax 15 & fist ntel.y of of rd. 7. Larry and Judy Buck Lot 5 (p4n. ntely of rd. in if 13 a) Box 475 Duckabush River lid. Brinnon, WA 98320 8. Mr, and Mrs. Robert Johnston ;;ii cit.' Box 485 Wckabush River iid. Brinnon, WA 98320 9. Margaret Meyer Lot 2 (n of rd.) P.U. Box 45 Brinnon, WA 98320 10. Merle J. Trask No. ? Box 825 fA,c1c; bu;;h ;tlvrr Rd. I Brinnon, I!A 93320 . Andrew i1ucl.l-, ,.. L5 14. I IIOU I .1.:, '3ox 5-'i,-l.. Olympia, UA r 1/ section 17, townsehip 25 north, range 2 west '` -- P __? f-z.A' ' Mr. and Mrs.Robert Rucci S17, T25N, Range 2 W Tax 10 1790 Maranca El Caj on, CA % y 7 This list will be updated as othexprope'rty owners along the DuckaUush Ri R d th ver oa au orize the posting of the signs on their property. You may contact any of these owners personally if you wish to verify the authorization they have granted me. Sincerely, Karen B. Clarkson Box 460 Auk-bush River Rd. Brinnon, WA 98300 i j X11 I ? f . 1 i i 1 ?r r 1 I S G correspondence j m Myers 1 I. J 13 A i L 1 z `' lL? GL? G c i TIC... ??-, Y i } j l? n N J 7 i .. HIV CG'?.G (i., ' ?Cs?1r G? .?t CCtNC -G Z c -?>r ti, letter for no spray letter for no spray f n n w.. F ? ` June 6th ty F TO WHOM IT MAY LCONCERNs !, PLEASE DO NOT SPRAY MY PROPERTY. REPEAT"DO NOT SPRAY MY PROPERTY IS AT THE TERMINATION OF CAPE GEORGE BECKETT POINT ROAD AND HASTINGS ROAD, AND THE THIRD $IDE BOUNDARY IS A "COUNTY CUT_OFF ROAD"... F<< W: k ; j 01 ? /tas?irrq, ,5 ?oL P. Townseird THANK YOU: SEVEN SEAS V.OAT WORKS } s - RT. 3 BOX 23 PORT TOWNSEND, WASHINGTON 98368 i r RECEIVED JUN 9-1976 JEFFERSON COUNTY ENGINEERS OFFICE i r.. J - letter do not spray ?? (??a letter to not spray letter to not spray map Lletter to not spray _ :chew. , a° ? u. se,d, ?? a. road r On ale a r "8 u.e Spa y Q pax?m r? ?? (N}?> Srole off' e, ro0.c a a 50 10?,t ds 'm tAe c4 re??' cue road w1?er Cl- rZdla? av,sl ;,,? mat.?ea?'e? -:a ?C9 yp Qa ¢ 9bn-? S?Y1?1 a,? ?? a.o?' C? ~ ? avel ?o0.Ci 0.??aXi1`Y10.? <<_+ ? 4?rhe.r: (Ma ,?pP r p V-eor re 9 u aOj 1?, OJ- r11M .,,?„ ?:??? Y "f?i+ra ?7,z any?? ??i?"?,r ?c. -;? ?.sw, ?,•,?,,tra r... - ,__. ._, rdr, ter" e ws ,,? J letter to not spray `-An ` vJ! ;?{f"s ;r Zip- 3 box `$ i s'q? C.?G?,x'V?co}? ?S1Snf?H r??L,?P? Q?,U py?Urrtt?"? 1 ?„rkIr5 °?n ;il?ox 4 ? ? o1r?'xl Koad IJ_?v I ghak? 'Fort J a t --] letter to not spray ?rtment e p Jefferson County Elwin 1. Becker Director Sir: I um wrttin!, to all you I do not want the county to snrdy wither side of the rood in l'ou orob?bly have -liver Road Lli . ps { front of my place or my brothers place on the Josew;, ). inhere people h va livestock., but if you huve'nt you Q already told your crew to not snr:jy ience th t your spray doe st'et some snimuls but not ethers. ) • xper should. I kno:v from s I know because I bought -'a to d of 1L Lfa 1st Wa f C i ` pPIe orchard in ate n .,sh. m, canna f ro before they found out the sir, y d a hjt.^.:fu1 to ?TUm:1 end the nim_1e died but if it effects any nim. is 11 nica?l t ff , s ec this hay. I re.,d later th,t it :roes not e t mere of these welfare hinnies to wort but put a armed F u it seems you should not use it . them out brush instead of standing, around all day like the ruy up k e s-uurd with them and ma the river did a couple ye i ago. -Uso since you 1eo1;Le ire the ones doing the spraying ut uo that ent p and you have a county sir-n m,ker nhy not have; him mike the si.?ns that you g :way your crew :would know: whut to leek for vhan they spray shi 2oN,R2;l, 'a.iri' tior 34 'fown p ' S - - ec -, ast The property is the South .:ast Borth tion 34 "c,wnshin 26R, 21.,I-46 F4 t ,..ec Usc :.ouch .est,i'.orth 'est,:.orth 3as Isc Lot io.I ( <) I-A6 :4,.-,ecticn 34 Township 26 R.2 aso 534 'P26 R2 ^ ax I(leas ij-) ?ff i I think it is rc reasonable that we have to put up with this kind of picsoning, in the I ?t is'nt just the county either 'roe have to keep a eye on the P.U.D. because every l ace. first p once in a while they try to sneak a spray crew throu,<h the area. Very truly yours, ? James C.Croaell j I I -_ _ ROSoG,2ooL ?" MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT RE: VANPOOL U TILIZATION By and Between Jefferson Transit Authority and Jefferson County Dept. of Public Works Term of Agreement: June 7, 1987 through September 30, 1987 Jefferson Transit will: A) Provide Jefferson County with a 15-passenger van in good working order for the purposes contained herein; B) Replace said van with a backup vehicle if it becomes disabled or requires maintenance service; and C) Be responsible for all vehicle maintenance costs. Jeffer son County Dept. of Public Works will: A) Remit to Jefferson Transit L.22 per mile and all costs of driver license reviews in response to monthly invoices; B) Purchase all fuel for vehicle operations; C) Remit to Jefferson Transit the cost of vehicle insurance effective 1 for the term of the agreement in response to invoices; D) Provide Jefferson Transit with a complete list of passengers by June 19, 1987; E). Detail the person(s) listed in item H below for training by the { Jefferson Transit Operations Supervisor prior to the commencement of transportation services; F) Designate the following person as responsible for the overall operation of the vehicle: ----EDWARD P _ H?BEFZ------------ G) Utilize the vehicle for the following purposes: r yE?ETATl9L??1ANA?AIENT_PFOSR2?LFDRIIMQ9F_?9&Z----------------- -------------------------------- --------------------------------- -----------------------------------------------------------------; f 1 _ 1 r l L? r- H) Authorize operation of the vehicle by the following individuals: EDWARD P__HABER__EARL WELLS(COUNTY_ROAD_SUPERINTENDENTZ_________ ------- ------------------------- ---- - --- ----------------------------------------------------------------s I) Report all mechanical defects of the equipment immediately to Jefferson Transit and follow Jefferson Transit proscribed procedures in the event of any accidents incidents or mechanical E breakdown; J) On forms provided by Jefferson Transit, report monthly Ridership, starting and ending mileage by vehicle, and all monthly fuel and oil usage no later than the first (lst) working day of the following month; and K) Be in violation of this Agreement and subject to immediate surrender of the vehicle and termination of this Agreement if any of the above items are violated. - - - - - ? ? - - ransit Authority Jefferson County Department of J Person T Public Works 1 Date:_ /--- ---3 i _I - I 1 2 - - e Minutes, Week of May 21, 1984 Page 5: Public Works Request to cut timber on County ri ht-of-way: Due 5/21/84 t - o ogging eing one in t e area near Old agl.emont Road, a strip of trees s left on the 60 foot right- of-way that could cause a potentially dangerous sit- uation in a wind storm. A request to cut down these trees has been received. The Prosecuting Attorney advised that, the Board would have to declare this timber surplus and then put it up E for auction. Bill Arey of the Public Works department looked the situation over and didn't feel that there was any immediate danger. The Board asked for more specific information about how much timber is involved, etc. before they decide if it is worth the cost to declare ?. it surplus and go through the process. 5/21/84 Port Townsend Marathon Board:' Jack Westerman thanked the Public or,cs Department and the Board of Commissioners. for their efforts in regard to the road closures for the Port Townsend Marathon, on behalf of the Marathon _ Board. 5/23/84 Kas ac Corporation re; Striping contract: The contract or str ping various county'roa s as awarded to KASPAC orporation of Seattle on May 7, 1984 was signed by i the Board. The meeting was recessed on Monday and reconvened Tuesday with all members in attendance. j Blair Wolfley, County Extension AF nt re; Advisory Committee for Pro rams: rn e u rom t e tate Cooperar. ve xtens on ice an a r o fley addressed the Board regarding the Vegetation Control Program and the need to set up an advisory committee. Vegetation Control Program: Blair Wolfley reported that a summer intern ;gas been approve rom as ington State University to do the recordkeeping for the study. { Advisory Committee: To enable the Cooperative Extension service to .now t at t e r programs are meeting the needs of the County, Blair Wolfley asked that each Commissioner suggest a person from their district that would be willing to serve on an advisory committee. This committee I would meet possibly twice a year to look at the programs rams provided and to give input as to the community's needs that the extension service could address. The Board will submit a list of names within the next couple of weeks. BID OPENING re: For the furnishing of Metal Culvert Pipe: Bidders: Bid Totals ?o ) Kaiser Aluminum, Bellevue $9,175.68 with tax 2) Armco, Inc. Hillsboro Oregon 5,907.30 " (steel) 3) Cascade Culvert, Arlington 6,105.79 " (steel) Engineer's Estimate 6,225.45 Commissioner Pitts seconded Commissioner Brown's motion to have the engineer check the bids for possible errors and to make a recommendation on what type of pipe to accept., after they cletermine what, kind of pipe Kaiser Aluminum is bidding to supply. Application for Assistance from Soldiers' and Sailors' Relief - , Fund: Comm sue stoner Brown secon ea`Comm`fcsioner Pitts' motion to approve 'r.iie application for $10U.00 from the Soldiers' and Sailors' Relief Fund for Chris Gaut. L- Jefferson County Department of Public Works ' }?R"J' 't'Ti"j;?[!P.^>v` Kr]T r j ! N COURTHOUSE POkI TOWNSEND, WASHINGTON 98368 - - i )h'FI'LRSON CU0N'I'1 1 UVR'I110LUG IEL. (206)3853505 ' - , 1 i ,. .. t ; I.. .,'. •'? LIIIIl.NI :;IIII IUN, D11411:1141 INVENTORY OF HERBICIDES AT HADLOCK SHOP 5/23/85 BOB HENDERSON QUAN. SIZE DESCRIPTION 3 5 GAL. DOW FORMULA 40 1 5 GAL. DOW DMA 4 4 50 LB. DUPONT KOVAR I i i 2 45 LB. DOW DOWPON C e OPENE D CONTAINEDS ( APPROXIMATE GALLONS) j 1 5 GAL. DOW FORMULA 40 C4'x) 1 30 GAL. DUPONT KRENITE (29) 1 30 GAL. DOW ESTERON (10) 1 j 1 y, I r WASHINGTON STATE COUNTY ROAD ADMINISTRATION BOARD ERNEST GEISSLER P.E., DIRECTOR 206-753.6578 { 6730 MARTIN WAY, N.E. OLYMPIA, WASHINGTON 98504 i { June 10, 1980 f ? TO: ALL COUNTY ENGINEERS FROM: ERNEST GEISSLER, DIRECTOR I v RE: STANFORD RESEARCH INSTITUTE STUDY 1 An extensive study of the possible effects of 2,4-D is being conducted by the Stanford Research Institute. The study is being funded by the National Forest Products Association and is intended to examine the possible health effects of human exposure to phenoxy herbicides. When we were first contacted about this study, we suggested to the Institute that all our applicators are licensed by the state and that they should get their information from that source. However, this study is attempting to identify not just licensed applicators but all those married male employees, 35 years of age or younger who have been exposed to 2,4-D at any time since January 1, 1978. This could include individuals who have assisted the lic- ensed applicators by mixing the chemical or by being within one half mile of aerial spraying, or by working in recently sprayed areas, or for that matter, any other type of casual exposure. The I nstitute is asking simply for a list of the. names and addresses of men who fall into the category indicated above. The Institute will then, in turn, send a short questionnaire to each of these individuals who then individually are, of course, free to answer or refuse to answer as they may choose. ! If you have any employees who fall into this category, will you please sub- mit to this office their names and addresses immediately because we want to make our response to Stanford no later then Friday, June 20th. ? . Thanks for your cooperation. I I cc: CRAB Commissioners - _ EG:sw ,. 1 f i' L J vegetation management 7100 Integrated Vegetative Management (Roadside) Workshop Forest Supervisors, Olympic, Mt Baker-Snoqualmie and Mt Hood NF's The Gifford Pinchot NF is sponsoring a Roadside Integrated Vegetative !I Management (IVM) workshop on May 3-4. The objectives of the session are to explain the principles and concepts of IVM as it relates to roadsides and explore alternatives to present methods of controlling roadside vegetation. The preliminary agenda is enclosed. Each Forest is invited to send 8-10 employees. Attendees will be primarily road managers and road maintenance foremen. The session will begin at 10:00 am on May 3 at the Mount St Helens Visitor Center (on Route 504, approximately 5 miles east of I-5 exit 49). May 4 will be a field visit to several sites on the Gifford Pinchot NF. A block of rooms has been reserved at Ferryman's Motel, 7901 NE 6th Avenue, Vancouver, WA, 206-574-2151 for the night of May 3• Attendees shold call the motel and reserve a room in their name. The rates are $29 + tax for single room. By April 25, please inform Becky Hutchins (R. Hutchins:R06F03A) how many people will be attending from your Forest. 0 . - 777] April 8, 1988 PRELIMINARY AGENDA Roadside IVM Workshop Gifford Pinchot, Olympic, Mt Hood & Mt Baker-Snoqualmie NFs May 3-4, 1988 MAY 3 Mount St Helens Visitor Center (5 miles east of I-5 exit 49 on Rt 504) 1000 Introductions Becky Hutchins, GP Review Objectives 1015 Basic principles of IVM Greg Prull, IPM Asso, Inc What it i s - what it isn't 1045 Discussion of why the Forest Service is Chuck Tietz RO , interested in IVM Status of the Regional EIS 1105 How to set up an IVM program: Greg Prull JJ? -Steps involved -What information is needed, in what detail LUNCH 6 1230 Successes and failures Tom Turpin, Siuslaw -include "how-to" and examples Earl Nutt, Siuslaw -Cost effectiveness Peter DeChant, Multnomah Jack Peterson, Skamania ` Phil Crawford, Skamania 1530 What we're doing now (in dealing report from Forests with roadside vegetation) 1600 Feedback from attendees MAY 4 (Field Trip to Gifford Pinchot NF) L f ? Van pools will leave from Ferryman's Motel, Vancouver at 8:00 am and return at approximately 3:00 m I p . We will travel to several sites on the Gifford Pinchot NF which contain some "typical" vegetation problems (alder moss avem t , , p en grasses). Discussions will include a historical perspective on treatment current , methods of treatment and possible alternatives. i , I i rlU? EMPLOYMENT PROGRAM! JOB DESCRIPTION JOB TITLE: Vegetation Management W'rt 1459. 1e$7•_p1D WORK•SITE: Selected County Roads HOST AGENCY: Jefferson County NUMBER IN CREW: 8-10 m Dept. Public Works ADDRESS: Courthouse Port Townsend, WA 98368 WAGE: $3.35/hr, 40 hrs/wk I SUPERVISOR: William Arey County Road Super. SCHEDULE: 7:00 AM to 3:30'PMf Monday thou Friday I PHONE NO.: 385-3505 or 385-0890 . I. SUMMARY OF JOB A. GENERAL Use of manual vegetation management techniques for the control of roadside vegetation. Testin th g eories of establishment of Plant communities and validity of no n-use of herbicides.. Involving cutting, pulling thinning of noxi ous vegetation. i Il. PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS A. OCCUPATIONAL JOB SKILLS t 1. INITIALLY REQUIRED' i Ability to take directions and criticism. Good eye-hand coordination U f . se o basic gardening tools. fff 2. WILL BE LEARNED Skilled gardening techniques. Plant identification and control methods. I B. WORK MATURITY SKILLS 1. INTIALLY REQUIRED Ability to take supervision and criticism. Ability to tolerate a physicall y tedious task. 2. WILL BE LEARNED Work independently in recognizing and determining treatment for problem areas. Make effective coherant suggestions for innovative treatment. 7, J TO: Host Agencies for the Summer Youth Employment and ' Training Program FROM: Gay Dubigk, Executive Director SUBJECT: APPROVED JOB DESCRIPTION(S)/PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS This is to notify you that the Job Description(s)/Project Descriptions submitted by your agency for summer youth workers has been approved. I If a suitable applicant is available for your job description, a staff member will be contacting the work site supervisor to implement the referral process. We will provide your agency and the direct supervisor with an orientation. Our Memorandum of Agreement is enclosed for your review. Participants may not begin work until the Agreement has been signed. If you have not done so, please sign the enclosed copy and return it at the earliest possible date. If you have already signed the enclosed Agreement, the copy is for your files. Once you have interviewed a youth and feel he/she will be able to fulfill your job description PLEASE CONTACT OUR OFFICE. Youth may begin work once a mutually agreeable start date is determined. Should you need further information or assistance, please contact your local Northwest Services Council office. We are looking forward to your cooperation for a productive Summer Program. ECOVED f,':AY 1 ,u t°88 JE;7t=ER:j0[\1 COl1N1'Y ENGINEERS OFFICE 1002 LAWRENCE - PORT TOWNSEND, WA 98388 FORKS, WA 335.5578 374.8058 ',,.:j EMPLOYMENT 8 TRAINING PROGRAMS - no •;,,, west services council MAY o 6 1988 ' ONE HUNDRED AND ONE PROSPECT STREET, SUITE TEN (P•0-816X2009) BELLINGHAM, WA 90227 (2061671-1660 - (208) 3901828 - MEMORANDUM Of AGREEMENT Authorized under the Job Training Partnership Act (JTPA, PL 97-300), and by the Northwest Services Council. Jef_f_erson__Co. Public idork_s Dept___, hereinafter referred to as the AOST AGENCY, assures and certifies the NORTHWEST SERVICES COUNCIL, hereinafter referred to as the SPONSOR, that: The HOST AGENCY makes the following assurances and certifications: a. It will comply with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 USC 2000d). b. It will not in any way discriminate against, deny benefits to, deny employment to, or exclude from participation any persons on the grounds of race, color, national origin, religion, age, sex, handicap or political affiliation or belief. C. The work activity does not involve political activity. d. Participants in the program will not be employed on the construction, operation or maintenance of that part of any facility which is used for religious instruction or worship. e. Appropriate standards for health and safety in work and training situations will be maintained and all Federal and Washington State Regulations governing the employment of Minors will be observed. f. THE PROGRAM WILL NOT RESULT IN THE DISPLACEMENT Of EMPLOYED WORKERS OR IMPAIR E%ISTING CONTRACTS FOR SERVICES OR RESULT IN THE SUBSTITUTIONS OF FEDERAL FUNDS FOR OTHER FUNDS IN CONNECTION WITH WORK THAT WOULD OTHERWISE BE PERFORMED. It will submit reports as required by the Sponsor and will I report to the Sponsor, as required, the time worked and the work assessment of participants, and shall keep copies of all time records. ' I I The I PARTICIPANT(S) assigned by the Sponsor to the Host Agency: a. Are not in any sense to be considered Federal, State, County, or City employees within the meaning of the law administered by the U.S., State or City Civil Service Commission and will not have recourse to the Federal Tort Claims Act when employed by 11 Federal Agency or acting on behalf of the Host in the official capacity. ' b. Shall, within the range of duties and hours of work fixed end/or approved by the Sponsor, be assigned duties by the Host Agency and shall be required to perform the duties in the menner specified by the Host Agency. C. Shell have the following provided by the Host Agency: 1. On-site training, technical direction and daily supervision. 2. Office space, supplies, equipment and other working tools and facilities necessary for the performance of their assignment, if not otherwise provided. LOCALOFFICES: 107 E 8TH 1002 LAWRENCE PORT ANGELES, WA 98782 PORT TOWNSEND, WA 98708 FORKS, WA 4524202 3836578 745-0888 EMPLOYMENT 6 TRAINING PROGRAMS - r duties performed in ssement for transportation Reimbp-, 3 ? , . their`.,i.,brk assignment, if not othe, ise provided. 4. Work release time for participation in other 'approved training activities, including employability development training and job search activities. d. Shall meet Host Agency standards as to qualification to operate its equipment. The Host Agency shall be the sole judge of the qualifications of the participant in this respect. e. Supplies, equipment and other working tools and facilities provided by the Host Agency for the purpose of this agreement shall not be the responsibility of the Sponsor and the Sponsor will not be responsible for damage or loss resulting from any cause. - f. On request of the Host Agency, the Sponsor will reassign or terminate the assignment of participant(s) provided by the Sponsor. In the event that a dispute arises between the Host Agency and the participant, the Sponsor should be notified by either party. The Sponsor will attempt to arbitrate the dispute before any formal appeal process is initiated. If the situation, covered by JTPA Law or regulations, is not settled to the satisfaction of both parties, and Host Agency initiates or continues the dispute against the participant„ the participant may initiate the JTPA appeal process with the Grant Recipient/Administrative Entity. The Host Agency assures and certifies that, if upon written notification from the Sponsoring Agency of noncompliance with any of the above assurances or certifications, it will take necessary action within ten (10) days to correct the noncompliance or cease participation in the agreement per the written notification. The duration of employment for participants is limited to the duration of their current program. This agreement shall be valid for the placement of participants until June 30, 1990. The obligation of any party hereto may be terminated by the party upon ten (10) days notice in writing to the other party, said notice to be computed from date of mailing. HOST AGENCY: Jefferson Co. Public Forks Department Name of Organization WA 98358___ Box 1220 Port Townsend, P .0 . _ _ _ _ _ _ --------/---------- -------------City-----------Zip Code ----------------------- Signs ture of Authorized Representative PrQfePg gDs.1_Fnpinegur_ -Cl iter_t(r of Public-W orks?_ 51 188 Title Date SPONSORING AGENCY: Northwest Services Council { Signature of Authorized Representative Gay Dubigk, Executive Director F_ -- ?. MAY o 6 1988 EMPLOYMENT PROGRAM JOB DESCRIPTION JOB TITLE: Summer Public Works WORK SITE: Jefferson Department Labor County f HOST AGENCY: (Name of agency # JTPA PARTICIPANTS responsible for placement) TO BE EMPLOYED: 4 Jefferson County Public - Works ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1220, Port WAGE: $3.35/hr j Townsend, WA 98368 hrs/week SUPERVISOR: (Agency person SCHEDULE: (list days, 1 responsible for position; hours of work week; direct supervisor) duration of positiop)" Earl Wells, Operations 5 days/week Supervisor 7:00-4:00; June-Aug ALTERNATE SUPERVISOR: (agency person responsible for direct { supervision in absence of immediate supervisor) William Arey, Foreman PHONE NO.: 385-0890 I. SUMMARY OF JOB A. GENERAL f j Work consists of vegetation management along Jefferson , County roadways, using manual and mechanical techniques; bridge cleaning and painting; culvert j cleaning and marking; parks improvement work. II. PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS A. OCCUPATIONAL JOB SKILLS 1. INITIALLY REQUIRED Using hand tools, including weed eaters for vegetation management along roadsides: cutting, thinning, chipping removing vegetation. Bridge work requiring wirebrushing, scraping and brooming, painting. Culvert cleaning requiring use of shovels, machetes, rakes and weedeaters. 1 Parks work will consist of using general gardening tools. A f } 2. WILL BE LEARNED Participants will learn landscaping techniques and will develop an awareness of landscaping maintenance and design including erosion control. They will learn basic carpentry techniques. In bridge work they will learn techniques to recognize and control rust and corrosion. In culvert cleaning they will learn basic inspection with techniques for controlling culvert deterioration and prevention of flooding. B. WORK MATURITY SKILLS 1. INITIALLY REQUIRED Participants are expected to be interested in working out of doors, be able to work under supervision, and work with others. f 2. WILL BE LEARNED Participants will learn to cooperate and express their ideas under sometimes strenuous conditions. They will learn how to better take and give 1 criticism. Independent work skills will be ? learned, and some participants will learn leadership techniques. All participants will learn basic safety requirements for working with hand and power tools, and traffic control. f i III. TRAINING PROVIDED A. ON-SITE TRAINING and FORMAL TRAINING All participants will be taught plant species recognition. Education in sight distance requirements - a for intersections and traffic control and signing, and erosion control, techniques. Basic cleaning and paint preparation and carpentry techniques will be taught. B. EQUIPMENT, TOOL, OR MACHINERY TRAINING Basic hand gardening tools, including weedeaters and chippers; power sanders, and wirebrushes, basic painting tools. All participants will be thoroughly taught the use of al all equipment, and the safety required for all use. Signature of Direct Supervisor Date MAY 0 6 198$ j i r- ` MAY p 6 1988 EMPLOYMENT PROGRAM PROJECT DESCRIPTION JOB TITLE: Summer Public Works WORK SITE: Jefferson Department Labor County HOST AGENCY: (Name of agency # JTPA PARTICIPANTS responsible for placement) TO BE EMPLOYED: 4 j Jefferson County Public Works ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1220, Port WAGE: $3.35/hr Townsend, WA 98368 hrs/week SUPERVISOR: (Agency person SCHEDULE: (list days, responsible for position; hours of work week;, direct supervisor) duration of position) Earl Wells, Operations 5 days/week Supervisor 7:00-4:00; June-Aug ALTERNATE SUPERVISOR: (agency person responsible for direct' supervision in absence of immediate supervisor) William Arey, Foreman PHONE NO.: 385-0890 I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION A. GENERAL The project will focus upon several maintenance tasks, ' including Park grounds maintenance culvert cleaning and maintenance, bridge cleaning and painting and vegetation management along county roads. The purpose is to upgrade the county parks by additional landscaping and some trail construction. The vegetation management project is a continuation of our previous efforts to improve intersection erosion control and remove undesirable vegetation along our rights-of-way. Bridge and culvert inspection and cleaning will increase the efficiency of our county road crews by removing from them the additional burden of cleaning and inspection. It will also increase the life and effectiveness of these elements. By l performing these tasks the public will be served by an improved parks atmosphere, cleaner and more accessible parks, by better usage of public monies by using more f cost effective laborers, and by continuation of a program that the county has been committed to for many years. r i - i i 7 B. PROJECT WORK ACTIVITIES 1. Parks Maintenance/Landscaping is an on-goin process that includes planting g ve et ti g a on, some fence and tra building. 2• Bridge cleaning and painting will focus on identificati on of bridges in need of cleaning due to rust and t l a corrosion. Work wi l be done from bridge to bridge and will b e scheduled according to the efficienc of th y e crew. 3• Culvert cleaning and marking will continue a program that marks on the road the location of each culvert t o enable the county road crew to spot culverts to prevent culvert dama e h g w en they are doing their normal grading and ditching. Cleanin f g o culverts will allow water to flow (I freely and prevent ditch clo i gg ng and flooding. 4• Vegetation management continues our program of manual and mechanical control along roadsides. This is a program that has been i n place for nine years, and has always employed youths in th su e mmer. Better sight distance, safer intersection s and safer signing is a goal. II. PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS A. OCCUPATIONAL JOB SKILLS 1• INITIALLY REQUIRED Using hand tools, including weed eaters for vegetation m anagement along roadsides: cutting, thinning, chipping re i mov ng vegetation. Bridge work requiring wirebrushin sc i g, rap ng and brooming, painting. Culvert cleaning re ui q ring use of shovels, machetes, rakes and weedeaters. Parks work will consist of using general gardening tools. 2• WILL BE LEARNED Participants will learn landscaping techniques and will develop an awareness of landscaping maintenance and design including er i os on control. They will learn basic carpentry techniques brid In e k . g wor they will learn techniques to recognize and control rust and corrosion. In culvert cleaning they will learn basi i c nspection with techniques for controlling culvert deterioration and prevention of flooding. I 1 L? 7 I B. EDUCATIONAL SKILLS 1. Employees will be required to keep accurate time schedule a d n will need to be able to perform basic math, read and write. They will d nee to be able to listen well, as most instructions will be verbal. C. WORK MATURITY SKILLS 1. INITIALLY REQUIRED I Participants are expected to be interested in workin out f g o doors, be able to work under supervision, and work with others. 2. WILL BE LEARNED f Participants will learn to cooperate and exress their ideas under t sometimes strenuous condi ions. 'They will learn how to bette t r ake and give criticism. Independent work skills will be learned, and some participants will learn leadershi te h p c niques. All participants will learn basic safety requirements f or working with hand and power tools, and traffic control. III. A. MATERIALS PROVISION The county will provide all equipment, tools and safety equipment, includin l g g oves. Participants must provide heavy work clothes, boots and ( o ibl p ss y) rain gear. B. EQUIPMENT PROVISIONS Copy from Job Description III B. C. JOB SITE TRANSPORTATION NEEDED Vans and pickups will carry employees to and from job to job D . ue to the distances of various jobs, some round trip mileage will be as great as 60 or 80 miles, others may be 10 to 20 miles D. CONTINGENCY PLANS Only very high winds or severe rain will hamper production on thi s project. Should these conditions exist various tasks may be completed t a various county facilities, such as county shop, courthouse or I .. ? community centers. E. ON-SITE TRAINING AND FORMAL TRAINING All participants will be taught plant species r recognition. Education in sight distance requirements for intersections and traffic control and signing, and 1 = erosion control, techniques. Basic cleaning and paint preparation and carpentry techniques will be taught. F. ADDITIONAL PROVISIONS, etc. All safety or protective gear will be provided by the county and will include vests, hard hats gloves, goggles. Work boots and work clothing are to be provided by participants. Flagging cards will be required of some participants; the county will send these persons to flagging school. f E¢n/E a/cc?S,_ 7Yl Gt/Tii Pry^?/??x c?cS-?P Signature of Direct Supervisor Date f t Y fi MAY p 6 1988 1 t ? n JEFFERSON COUNTY ; !?• `mod May 5, 1988 Ms. Sue Wilson Northwest Services Council 1002 Lawrence St. Port Townsend, WA 98368 Dear Sue, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS 1820 Jefferson Street P.O. Box 1220 Port Townsend, WA 98368 (206) 385-3505 Enclosed is our Summer Youth Employment and Training program ° grant for 1988. As in past years, we will be providing a supervisor and supplementing the participant's wages so that they will be making $5.00 per hour. Thank you for your continuing attention to our program, we sincerely appreciate it. north%,-st services council ONE HUNDRED AND ONE PROSPECT STREET, SUITE TEN (P.O. BOX 2009) BELLINGHAM, WA 98227 120616711660 120610961828 ' MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT Authorized under the Job Training Partnership Act (JTPA, PL I 97-300), and by the Northwest Services Council. Jef ferson Co. Public Works Degt_ , hereinafter referred to as the __ HOST AGENCY, assures and certifies the NORTHWEST SERVICES COUNCIL, hereinafter referred to as the SPONSOR, that: The HOST AGENCY makes the following assurances and certifications: a. It will comply with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 USC 2000d). b. It will not in any way discriminate against, deny benefits to, deny employment to, or exclude from participation any persons j on the grounds of race, color, national origin, religion, age, sex, handicap or political affiliation or belief. C. The work activity does not involve political activity. d. Participants in the program will not be employed on the construction, operation or maintenance of that part of any facility which is used for religious instruction or worship. e. Appropriate standards for health and safety in work and training situations will be maintained and all Federal and Washington State Regulations governing the employment of Minors will be observed. f. THE PROGRAM WILL NOT RESULT IN THE DISPLACEMENT OF IMPLOYID WORKERS OR IMPAIR EXISTING CONTRACTS FOR SERVICES OR RESULT IN THE SUBSTITUTIONS OF FEDERAL FUNDS FOR OTHER FUNDS IN CONNECTION WITH WORE THAT WOULD OTHERWISE BE PERFORMED. It will submit reports as required by the Sponsor and will report to the Sponsor, as required, the time worked and the work assessment of participants, and shall keep copies of all time records. The PARTICIPANT(S) assigned by the Sponsor to the Host Agency: a. Are not in any sense to be considered Federal, State, County ,( or City employees within the meaning of the law administered by the U.S., State or City Civil Service Commission and will not have recourse to the Federal Tort Claims Act when employed by a Federal Agency or acting on behalf of the Host in the official capacity. b. Shall, within the range of duties and hours of work fixed and/or approved by the Sponsor, be assigned duties by the Host Agency and shall be required to perform the duties in the manner specified by the Host Agency. C. Shall have the following provided by the Host Agency: 1. On-site training, technical direction and daily supervision. j 2. Office space, supplies, equipment and other working tools - and fact Iitias necessary for the performance of their assignment, if not otherwise provided. LOCALOFFICES: 107 E 6TH 1002 LAWRENCE PORT ANGELES, WA 98382 PORT TOWNSEND, WA 88968 FORKS, WA 4524202 385-5578 3744858 I EMPLOYMENT 8 TRAINING PROGRAMS 3. Reimbursement for transportation for duties performed in their wor°' assignment, if not otherwi? provided. 4. Work re'-ase time for participatio„J in other approved training activities, including employability development training and job search activities. d. Shall meet Host Agency standards as to qualification to operate its equipment. The Host Agency shall be the sole judge of the j qualifications of the participant in this respect. e. Supplies, equipment and other working tools and facilities provided by the Host Agency for the purpose of this agreement shall not be the responsibility of the Sponsor and the Sponsor will not be responsible for damage or loss resulting from any cause. f. On request of the Host Agency, the Sponsor will reassign or terminate the assignment of participant(s) provided by the Sponsor. In the event that a dispute arises between the Host Agency and the participant, the Sponsor should be notified by either party. The Sponsor will attempt to arbitrate the dispute before any formal appeal process is initiated. If the situation, covered by JTPA Law or regulations, is not settled to the satisfaction of both parties, and Host Agency initiates or continues the dispute against the participant, the participant may initiate the JTPA appeal process with the Grant Recipient/Administrative Entity. The-Host Agency assures and certifies that, if upon written notification from the Sponsoring Agency of noncompliance with any of the above assurances or certifications, it will take necessary action within ten (10) days to correct the noncompliance or cease participation in the agreement per the written notification. The duration of employment for participants is limited to the duration of their current program. This agreement shall be valid for the placement of participants until June 30, 1990. The obligation of any party hereto may be terminated by the party upon ten (10) days notice in writing to the other party, said t notice to be computed from date of mailing. I HOST AGENCY: Jefferson Co. Public Works Department Name of Organization ---- P.0.Box 1220 Port Townsend, WA98368 --------------------------- Addres----City--- Zip Code _---_---(1-=--------------------------------- Signature of Authorized Representative rc QfO?siop??_FnpiitQ _(1?i ???or of_Public Works)_5j4188 Title Date SPONSORING AGENCY: Northwest Services Council Signature of Authorized Representative Gay Dubigk, Executive Director t EMPLOYMENT PROGRAM JOB DESCRIPTION JOB TITLE: Summer Public Works WORK SITE: Jefferson Department Labor County ST AGENCY: (Name of agency # JTPA PARTICIPANTS responsible for placement) TO BE EMPLOYED: 4 Jefferson County Public Works ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1220, Port WAGE: $3.35/hr Townsend, WA 98368 hrs/week I SUPERVISOR: (Agency person SCHEDULE: (list days, responsible for position; hours of work week; direct supervisor) duration of position) Earl Wells, Operations 5 days/week Supervisor 7:00-4:00; June-Aug ALTERNATE SUPERVISOR: (agency person responsible for direct supervision in absence of immediate supervisor) William Arey, Foreman PHONE NO.: 385-0890 I. SUMMARY OF JOB A. GENERAL Work consists of vegetation management along Jefferson county roadways, using manual and mechanical techniques; bridge cleaning and painting; culvert cleaning and marking; parks improvement work. II. PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS i j A. OCCUPATIONAL JOB SKILLS I 1. INITIALLY REQUIRED Using hand tools, including weed eaters for vegetation management along roadsides: cutting, thinning, chipping removing vegetation. Bridge work requiring wirebrushing, scraping and brooming, painting. Culvert cleaning requiring use of shovels, machetes, rakes and weedeaters. Parks work will consist of using general gardening tools. d t i i , 2. WILL BE LEARNED Participants will learn landscaping techniques and will develop an awareness of landscaping maintenance and design including erosion control. They will learn basic carpentry techniques. In bridge work they will learn techniques to recognize and control rust and corrosion. In culvert cleaning they will learn basic inspection with techniques for controlling culvert deterioration and prevention of flooding. B. WORK MATURITY SKILLS 1. INITIALLY REQUIRED a Participants are expected to be interested in working out of doors, be able to work under supervision, and work with others. 2. WILL BE LEARNED Participants will learn to cooperate and express their ideas under sometimes strenuous conditions. They will learn how to better take and give criticism. Independent work skills will be learned, and some participants will learn leadership techniques. All participants will learn basic safety requirements for working with hand and power tools, and traffic control. r III. TRAINING PROVIDED " A. ON-SITE TRAINING and FORMAL TRAINING All participants will be taught plant species recognition. Education in sight distance requirements for intersections and traffic control and signing, and erosion control, techniques. Basic cleaning and paint preparation and carpentry techniques will be taught. B. EQUIPMENT, TOOL, OR MACHINERY TRAINING Basic hand gardening tools, including weedeaters and chippers; power sanders, and wirebrushes, basic painting tools. All participants will be thoroughly taught the use of all equipment, and the safety required for all use. I 1 Signature of Direct Supervisor Date I r ' I F"LOYMENT PROGRAM t PROJECT DESCRIPTION 1 JOB TITLE: Summer Public Works WORK SITE: Jefferson i Department Labor County HOST AGENCY: (Name of agency # JTPA PARTICIPANTS responsible for placement) TO BE EMPLOYED: 4 Jefferson County Public Works ADDRESS: P.O. Box 1220, Port WAGE: $3.35/hr Townsend, WA 98368 hrs/week SUPERVISOR: (Agency person SCHEDULE: (list days, responsible for position; hours of work week; direct supervisor) duration of position) Earl Wells, Operations 5 days/week Supervisor 7:00-4:00; June-Aug ALTERNATE SUPERVISOR: (agency person responsible for direct supervision in absence of immediate supervisor) William Arey, Foreman PHONE NO.: 385-0890 i I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION A. GENERAL The project will focus upon several maintenance tasks, -) • including park grounds maintenance, culvert cleaning and maintenance, bridge cleaning and painting and vegetation management along county roads. The purpose is to upgrade the county parks by additional landscaping and some trail construction. The vegetation management project is a continuation of our previous efforts to improve intersection erosion control and remove undesirable vegetation along our rights-of-way. Bridge and culvert inspection and cleaning will increase the efficiency of our county road crews by removing from them the additional burden of cleaning and inspection. It will also increase the life and effectiveness of these elements. By performing these tasks the public will be served by an improved parks atmosphere, cleaner and more accessible parks, by better usage of public monies by using more cost effective laborers, and by continuation of a program that the county has been committed to for many years. E - i I? I B. PROJECT WORK ACTIVITIES 1. Parks Maintenance/Landscaping is an on-going process that includes planting, removing unwanted vegetation, some fence and trail building. 2. Bridge cleaning and painting will focus on identification of bridges in need of painting and cleaning due to r t d us an corrosion. Work will be done from bridge to bridge and will be scheduled according to the efficiency of the crew. 3. Culvert cleaning and marking will continue a program that marks on the road the location of each culvert to enable the county road crew to spot culverts to prevent culvert damage when they are doing their normal grading and ditching. Cleanin of l g cu verts will allow water to flow freely and prevent ditch l c ogging and flooding. 4. Vegetation management continues our program of manual and mechanical control along roadsides . This is a program that has been in place for nine years, and has always employed youths in the summer. Better sight distance, safer intersections and safer signing is a goal. II. PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS A. OCCUPATIONAL JOB SKILLS 1. INITIALLY REQUIRED Using hand tools, including weed eaters for vegetation management along roadsides: cutting, thinning, chipping removi ng vegetation. Bridge work requiring wirebrus hing, scraping and brooming, painting. Culvert cleaning requiring use of shovels, machetes, rakes and weedeaters . Parks work will consist of using general gardening tools. I 2. WILL BE LEARNED Participants will learn landscaping techniques and will develop an aware i ness of landscaping maintenance and design including erosion control . They will learn basic carpentry techniques. In brid e w k h or t g ey will learn techniques to recognize and control rust and corrosion In . culvert cleaning they will learn basic inspection with techniques for controlling culvert deterioration and prevention of flooding. i t i f ` 'f, B. EDUCATIONAL SKILLS 1. Employees will be required to keep accurate time schedule and will need to be able to perform basic math, read and write. They will need 'to be able to listen well, as most instructions will be verbal. C. WORK MATURITY SKILLS 1. INITIALLY REQUIRED Participants are expected to be interested in working out of doors, be able to work under supervision, and work with others. 2. WILL BE LEARNED Participants will learn to cooperate and express their ideas under sometimes strenuous conditions. They will learn how to better take and give criticism. Independent work skills will be learned, and some participants will learn leadership techniques. All participants will learn basic safety requirements for working with hand and power tools, and traffic control. i A. MATERIALS PROVISION The county will provide all equipment, tools and safety equipment, including gloves. Participants must provide heavy work clothes, boots and (possibly) rain gear. B. EQUIPMENT PROVISIONS Copy from Job Description III B. C. JOB SITE TRANSPORTATION NEEDED i Vans and pickups will carry employees to and from job to job. Due to the distances of various jobs, some round trip mileage will be as great as 60 or 80 miles, others may be 10 to 20 miles D. CONTINGENCY PLANS Only very high winds or severe rain will hamper production on this project. Should these conditions exist various tasks may be completed at various county j facilities, such as county shop, courthouse or l L L? community centers. i E. ON-SITE TRAINING AND FORMAL TRAINING ` All participants will be taught plant species recognition. Education in sight distance requirements for intersections and traffic control and signing, and erosion control, techniques. Basic cleaning and paint preparation and carpentry techniques will be taught. F. ADDITIONAL PROVISIONS, etc. All safety or protective gear will be provided by the county and will include vests, hard hats gloves, goggles. Work boots and work clothing are to be provided by participants. Flagging cards will be required of some participants; the county will send these persons to flagging school. ECtn/E Al /cct5 `7J7 Gt/7!/ J!'Y'-toiY?n.. bTS?B - I Signature of Direct Supervisor Date i r i r1 -l I noCwest services council ONE HUNDRED ANDONE PROSPECT STREET, SUITE TEN IPOBOX2009) BELLINGHAM, WA 98227 1206)6714660 1206) 398-1828 April 1, 1988 Dear Applicant Agency: The Summer Youth Employment and Training Program (SYETP) will again be sponsored by Northwest Services Council (NSC). The program is funded by the Job Training Partnership Act (JTPA). Eligible youth between 16 - 21 years of age may be placed with public and f non-profit agencies in jobs lasting from May 1 through September, I 1988. The Northwest Services Council pays all wages and benefits to participants. The enclosed Agency Application Packet briefly describes the program and the process for requesting a funded worker through this agency. Application is made by submitting a job description to us. The directions are included in the Application Packet. This summer's program is similar to past years', although because of reduced funding levels fewer youth will be served and more competition amongst potential worksites is expected.-. Your completed forms, along with a signed Memorandum of Agreement, should be returned to the Northwest Services Council office nearest you as soon as possible but no later than May 1, 1988.; if there are other staff in your agency that you wish to directly receive an Application Packet, please contact the local office i nearest you. ' Each county has staff to assist you in completing your application - and throughout the duration of the program. Please feel free to contact us for any assistance you may need. We look forward to working with you again this summer. Sinc/e?J?/ly, Gay Dubigk RECEIVED Executive Director APR 7 1988 JEFFERSON COUNTY ENGINEERS OFFICE LOCALOFFICES: 107 E STH 1002 LAWRENCE PORT ANOELES, WA 98302 PORT TOWNSEND, WA 98368 FORKS, WA 98531 d5241202 385.5578 3744MM - - --- -- EMPLOYMENTS TRAINING PROGRAMS - L., .... nor ,Nest services council f1 ! :' ONE HUNDRED AND ONE PROSPECT STREET, SUITE TEN (P.O.BOX2009) BELLINGHAM, WA98227 120616711660 (206) 398-1828 AGENCY APPLICATION PACKAGE FOR SUMMER YOUTH EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING PROGRAM (SYETP) WORK PLACEMENTS MAY - SEPTEMBER 30, 1988 it ! I LOCAL OFFICES: 107 E 81H 1002 LAWRENCE { I PORT ANGELES, WA 08362 PORT TOWNSEND, WA 00308 FORKS, WA 452-6202 385.5578 374$858 f •-- --- - -- - ---- EMPLOYMENT 8 TRAINING PROGRAMS +a INTRODUCTION The Olympic Consortium through the Northwest Services Council (NSC) ? J sponsors the Summer Youth Employment and Training Program (SYETP) funded , under Title II-B of the Job Training Partnership Act (JTPA). SYETP is designed to prepare youth, 16 through 21 years old, for entry into the labor market by providing a variety of activities and services which are structured to develop the basic behaviors, maturity, knowledge and skills needed for success in employment. The program contributes to the local effort of the Olympic Consortium to overcome the problem of youth unemployment in Clallam and Jefferson counties. A major part of SYETP, called Work Experience, places youth into subsidized employment with public and non-profit organizations. Work Experience provides youth with an opportunity and the structure to develop the behaviors, maturity, knowledge and skills necessary for success in employment while providing the benefits of their labor to the community with no direct cost to the hosting public agency. Youth may be employed up to a maximum of forty (40) hours per week. The hours of actual work vary depending upon participants' school status and their involvement in other scheduled program activities. Jobs may be either within the normal agency operations* or projects which are a one time effort or seasonal in nature. The Northwest Services Council is responsible for all wage and benefit payments to participants and _ provides on-going support through personal contact. All public and non-profit agencies and organizations may apply for these employment positions. Both individual and project (crew) placements are acceptable. Application for workers is made by writing the appropriate Job Description(s) and completing the Memorandum of Agreement included in this packet. # Work Experience Jobs funded under JTPA can only be additional to employment which would not otherwise be funded by an agency. JTPA programs are intended to increase employment and not in any way impair or replace existing employment or employment opportunities. `I i C i r -z- PROCESS FOR SUBMITTING APPLICATION FOR WORK EXPERIENCE POSITIONS Your a enc mak g y es application for workers by completing a description work activities in the fo t rma specified in the attached "Guide to Participant Job Description". A "Guide t P - ( o roject Description" provides instructions for application for crew/team project placements. Northwest Services Council will not be abl ? e to provide supervisors for crews. I Each individual job must have a separate job description; crew/team projects with work activities i n one or several locations need only one project description. You may apply for a combin ti a on of both single and crew (project) placements. For agencies which have hosted youth workers in the past, copies of previous job descriptions submitt d e by your agency are attached. Please note that these descriptions may need to b e revised and updated in the newly required format described in the packet. SELECTION CRITERIA Priority of work activities to be funded will be based on the followi criteria. Each activit ng is d y ju ged on its own merits. - * Benefit to Participant: a. Job Training and experience which increases a person's skills and employability. b. Variety of tasks, duties and skills provided . C. Availability of supervision, work-enabling tools, supplies. d. Exposure t o various occupational areas. e. Contingency plans for weather co diti n ons or other variables. * Completeness and Thoroughness of Job and/or Project Description: a. Clear, precise descripti ' on for b. Amount and kind of ALL work to be performed. supervision C. Clear indication of need for workers. * Social, Environmental and/or Physical Improvement: Availability of same to community upon completion. E * Other considerations will be: a. Equitable distribution of workers within counties and communities. b. Equitable distribution of skill areas offered . C. Track record of submitting agency. --------------- I L -3- T he duration of employment for participants in any particular placement is dependent on their Individual Training Plan. No placement is guaranteed past the current program year, September 30, 1988. Youth_workers------- cannot--- be- --reassigned_duties-andLor_pro.jects-which-have-not ---------- -- ------- been_appro_ed_ A maximum of flexibility will be allowed thr-oug-hout--a-n operating project and/or job (including reassignments, other projects, etc.) if PRIOR negotiations with this agency are made. Enclosed is an interagency Memorandum of Agreement. This Memorandum of Agreement outlines the assurances and certifications between the two -- cooperating agencies (NSC and Host). Applicants_cann_t_be_referred_-for placement__until__this__Memorandum__of_Agreement__has__been__signed__and returned_to_the__Northwest_Ser_ices_Council. Please sign and return it along with your Job and/or Project Description(s). We will then sign the Agreement and return a copy to you. RETURN_MAILING INSTRUCTIONS Applicant agencies should return completed Job and/or Project Descriptions and the signed Memorandum of Agreement to the Northwest Services Council in the county the job/project will operate. Please submit all requests together in the same package. This aids in efficient processing. You will be notified within seven (7) working - days regarding the status of your application. Clallam County - 107 East 8th Street Port Angeles, WA 98362 452-6202 fi Jefferson County - 1002 Lawrence Street Port Townsend, WA 98368 385-5578 i In each county, the Northwest Services Council staff is available to assist you in developing work activities which JTPA participants can perform, in preparing work activity (job/project) descriptions, and throughout the duration of the program. Please feel free to contact us j j for any assistance you may need. 1 fl i -- -- y J -5- I;T J i PREPARATION OF JOB DESCRIPTION FOR YOUTH EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING PROGRAM Prior to the completion of a Job Description, it is important to think through a breakdown of the tasks involved and identify the skills needed to actually do the job. It is important for purposes of our youth training program that specific requirements of the job and learning objectives are communicated to the participant. All jobs require two (2) types of skills: Work Maturity_Skills - These are the set of general skills needed by workers in any job to meet the attitudinal and behavioral expectations of the employer. Examples of work maturity skills include the ability to be on time, meet minimum attendance and dress requirements, accept supervision, communicate and maintain relationships with co-workers, be reliable and well-motivated, etc. OccupationalSkills - These are the set of skills which are specifically needed to perform a particular job. For example, an automobile mechanic must know how to use common hand and power tools, understand the operation and relationships of various parts and systems (ignition, fuel, brake, exhaust, etc.) of a vehicle, troubleshoot and diagnose problems, order parts, etc. Each job requires a unique set of skills. Included here are the specific educational skills (reading, writing, math) necessary to perform the job. It is also important to separate what you consider to be minimum standards of performance for entry level from those Work Maturity Skills and Occupational Job Skills which can be learned on the job. We suggest that the employee at your agency who will have direct supervisory responsibility over the participant be involved in the creation of the job description. Once a job or project description has been approved by this agency, participants can be referred for an interview. Please treat this as a real interview situation. It is important that you feel it is a worthwhile investment of your time and energy to host and train a youth. Consider their skills, but more critical is their interest and motivation. Youth participants should be interviewed as you would any applicant seeking employment in your agency. If you select a referred participant, contact our local office immediately. The next step will be the negotiation of an agreement between your agency, our agency and the participant; specifying goals, expectations and timeframes. Past experiences demonstrate that with appropriate planning, orientation, supervision, and instruction, most youth trainees perform their assignments well, making them a valuable asset to the hosting agency. We look forward to working with you this year. Please contact us if you have any questions or wish assistance in preparing a job description. -s- - I ATTACHMENTS: F 1. Guides to a. Participant Job Description i b. Project Description 2. Memorandum of Agreement must be ( signed and returned with _ job description) I 3. Previous Youth Job Descriptions (where applicable) i f r L I I I i F 1 -J The following GUIDE'? for your use in preparin ;i ndividual participant job descriptions for the"Northwest Services Council`''Is" program. USE YOUR AGENCY LETTERHEAD and be as complete as possible. There is no limit to the number of IJ jobs you may request, but each position should provide meaningful work experience and training opportunities for full-time (40 hours/week ) placements. i GUIDE TO PREPARATION OF: d ^ ' EMPLOYMENT PROGRAM J_OB_ DESCRIPTION JOB TITLE: WORK SITE: HOST AGENCY: (name of agency # JTPA PARTICIPANTS TO requesting placement) BE EMPLOYED: ADDRESS: WAGE: $3.35/hr hrs/week SUPERVISOR: (agency person SCHEDULE: (list days, hours of work responsible for position; week; duration of direct supervisor) position) 4 ALTERNATE SUPERVISOR: (agency person responsible for direct supervision in absence of immediate supervisor) PHONE NO.: I. SUMMARY OF JOB s I A. GENERAL I (Give brief, descriptive narrative, in general terms, of the job) II. PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS A. OCCUPATIONAL JOB SKILLS 1. INITIALLY REQUIRED List specific duties, tasks and skills initially regai.red to do the job, which will be the regular function and responsibility of the participant. 2. WILL BE LEARNED List the specific occupational skills which will be learned and the expected performance standards to be attained during the period of - participation. (OVER) 0 i r •? 1 t ti _J tK MATURI11__.,) SKILLS TIALLY REQUIRED t the minimum behavioral expectations initially required to get l keep the job. ,L BE LEARNED t the standards which you expect to be achieved during the period III. TRAINING PROVIDED A. ON-SITE TRAINING and FORMAL TRAINING Describe any training, instruction or other related activities which will enhance participants' employability, both on-site and/or formal training your agency will provide or arrange for. B. EQUIPMENT, TOOL or MACHINERY TRAINING ( Describe what equipment, tools, or machinery the participant will use ))) and what training will be provided. ------------------------------------ ----------------------- Signature of Direct Supervisor Date i j AM, i i i ----- ------ -- .i,i r- The following GUIDE for your use in preparingroject (crew) descriptions for the Northwest Services Council's program. U_ YOUR AGENCY LETTERHEAD and be as complete as possible. There is no limit to the number of different projects you may request, nor the number of positions per project. GUIDE TO PREPARATION OF: t r PROJECT DESCRIPTION { PROJECT TITLE: WORK SITE: (Location of -.j participants work) HOST AGENCY: (name of agency # JTPA PARTICIPANTS TO BE requesting placement) EMPLOYED ON PROJECT: ADDRESS: WAGE: $3.35/hr hrs/week SUPERVISOR: (agency person SCHEDULE: (list days, hours responsible for project; of work week direct supervisor) ALTERNATE SUPERVISOR: (agency person responsible for direct supervision in absence of immediate supervisor) PHONE NO.: (# where contact can be made during regular work hours) I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: A. GENERAL (Provide a brief description of what the project will do, the scope and purpose of the project, the need/community service that will be addressed.) B. PROJECTED WORK ACTIVITIES AND SCHEDULE (Outline work to be completed. Identify the specific results or products of the project and the estimated schedule for completion). II. PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS k A. OCCUPATIONAL JOB SKILLS i 1. List specific duties, tasks and skills initially required to do the job, which will be the regular function and responsibility i of the participant. j 2. List the specific occupational skills which will be learned and the expected performance standards to be attained during the 'j period of participation. (OVER) P J f I w.? ----- ---- . B. EDUCATIONAL 0 ILLS List the minimum, if any, reading, writing, or math abilities required to perform the job. C. WORK MATURITY SKILLS List the minimum behavioral expectations initially required to get and keep the job. 2. List the standards which you expect to be achieved during the Reriod of oarticipation_ III. A. MATERIALS PROVISION: (Materials supplied by you; materials needed.) B. EQUIPMENT PROVISIONS: (Describe what equipment will be necessary and utilized) C. JOB SITE TRANSPORTATION NEEDED: (Explain what transporting will be necessary; vehicles required and estimated miles round trip.) D. CONTINGENCY PLANS: Briefly outline your alternate plans for the workers when conditions i e.g.: weather the project , prevent work from proceeding on conditions, accelerated completion, etc.) E. ON-SITE TRAINING AND FORMAL TRAINING: (Describe the training, instruction and other related activities to ith technical skills, be provided which will acquaint participants w ir employability; both on-site and/or th e upgrade skills and enhance will provide or arrange for.) formal training your agency F. ADDITIONAL PROVISIONS, etc. i (e.g.: work enabling clothing, protective gear, licenses, etc. that are needed to perform job duties.) --------------------------- ------ ?k j __ ______ _ __ ------------ DATE SIGNATURR OF DIRECT SUPERVISOR ----- - ---- ------- nort`" vest services council ?? _ ONE HUNDRED AND ONE PROSPECT STREET, SUITE TEN (PO.6*X2C09) BELLINGHAM, WA 98227 (206)871.1660 (206)398.1828 i MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT Authorized under the Job Training Partnership Act (JTPA PL , I 97-300), and by the Northwest Services Council. _____________________________hereinafter referred to as the HOST AGENCY, assures and certifies the NORTHWEST SERVICES COUNCIL, hereinafter referred to as the SPONSOR, that: The HOST AGENCY makes the following assurances and certifications: a. It will comply with Title V1 of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 USC 2000d). b. It will not in any way discriminate against, deny benefits to, deny employment to or excl d , u e from participation any persons on the grounds of race, color, national origin religion age , , , sex, handicap or political affiliation or belief. C. The work activity does not involve political activity. d P . articipants in the program will not be employed on the construction, operation or maintenance of that part of any facility which i s used for religious instruction or worship. e. Appropriate standards for health and safet in k d y wor an training situations will be maintained and all Federal and Washington State Regulations governing the employment of Minors will be observed. ` f. THE PROGRAM WILL NOT RESULT IN THE DISPLACEMENT OF EMPLOYRD ( WORKERS OR IMPAIR EXISTING CONTRACTS FOR SERVICES OR RESULT IN THE SUBSTITUTIONS OF FEDERAL FUNDS FOR OTHER FUNDS IN CONNECTION WITH WORK THAT WOULD OTHERWISE BE PERFORMED . It will submit reports as required by the Sponsor and will report to the Sponsor, as required, the time worked and the work assessment of participants, and shall keep copies of all time records. The PARTICIPANT(S) assigned by the Sponsor to the Host Agency: I a. Are not in any sense to be considered Federal, State, County, ' or City employees within th i e mean ng of the law administered by the U.S., State or City Civil Service Commission and will not have recourse to the Federal Tort Claims Act when employed by a Federal Agency or acting on behalf of the Host in the official capacity. b. Shall, within the range of duties and hours of wor and/or approved by the Sponsor, be assigned duties by the Host Agency end shall be required to perform the duties in the manner specified by the Host Agency. C. Shall have the following provided by the Host Agency: 1. On-site training, technical direction and daily supervision. 2. Office space, supplies, equipment and other working tools and facilities necessary for the performance of their assignment, if not otherwise provided. LOCAL OFFICES: 107 E STH 1002 LAWRENCE - PORT ANGELES, WA 98352 PORT TOWNSEND WA 95366 " . FORKS, WA 3524202 355.5575 77/d555 - EMPLOYMENT A TRAINING PROGRAMS I F7- i ---------- igna ure of Authorized Representative ------------------------------------------------------ Title Date SPONSORING AGENCY: Northwest Services Council ----------------------------------------------------- Signature of Authorized Representative Gay Dubigk, Executive Director ispu e e or y p -e situation, covered by JTPA Law or regulations, is not settled to the satisfaction of both parties, and Host Agency initiates or continues the dispute against the participant, the participant may initiate the JTPA appeal process with the Grant Recipient/Administrative Entity. The Host Agency assures and certifies that, if upon written notification from the Sponsoring Agency of noncompliance with any of the above assurances or certifications, it will take necessary action within ten (10) days to correct the noncompliance or cease l participation in the agreement per the written notification. The duration of employment for participants is limited to the duration of their current program. This agreement shall be valid for the placement of participants until June 30, 1990. The obligation of any party hereto may be terminated by the party upon ten (10) days notice in writing to the other party, said notice to be computed from date of mailing. HOST AGENCY:________________ ---------------------------------- Name of Organization ------------------------------------------------------ Address City Zip Code 3. Reimbgement for transportation er duties performed in their `'>: rk assignment, if not othese provided. 4. Work release time for participation in other approved training activities, including employability development training and job search activities. d. Shall meet Host Agency standards as to qualification to operate its equipment. The Host Agency shall be the sole judge of the qualifications of the participant in this respect. e. Supplies, equipment and other working tools and facilities provided by the Host Agency for the purpose of this agreement shall not be the responsibility of the Sponsor and the Sponsor will not be responsible for damage or loss resulting from any cause. f. On request of the Host Agency, the Sponsor will reassign or terminate the assignment of participant(s) provided by the Sponsor. In the event that a dispute arises between the Host Agency and the participant, the Sponsor should be notified by either party. The Sponsor will attempt to arbitrate the d' t b f e an formal a peal process is initiated. If the ECOLOGICAL CONTROL OF ? ROADSIDE VEGETATION :port to the Jefferson County Board of Commissioners fitted by: Roger del Moral ciate Professor irtment of Botany (AJ-10) iersity of Washington tle, Washington 98195 atisfaction of the conditions and requirements contained in the ract entered into between the Commissioners and Dr. del Moral on 23, 1979. E October 24, 1979. S INTRODUCTION General Principles Plant ecology deals with the growth, structure, function, and development ;..j of vegetation. Vegetation is dynamic, changing in only generally predictable ways under the influence of processes that, while incompletely understood, are well described. However, the development of any particular portion of vegetation cannot be predicted in detail from general principles. Site- specific analyses are therefore required to accurately predict the course of vegetation change. While vegetation change (succession) has been viewed as unidirectional and ' inexorable, more recent studies contradict this view. Vegetation often develops by fits and starts, with relatively stable stages eventually re- placed by stages in which rapid changes may occur. The keys to understanding such processes are the sources and location of potentially invading species and the competitive interactions among species. By relatively small effort, it is often possible to deflect vegetation succession in such ways as to produce relatively stable communities that require little maintenance and which possess other desirable traits. The general goals of roadside management include these: 1. To economically insure the efficient and safe operation of roads; 2. To produce naturalized vegetation on the right-of-way that is self-sustaining and which blends into the surrounding vegetation; 3. To control erosion from slopes and cut banks; 4. To an acs produce Y pleasing j theticl right-of-way; 5. To provide cover for desirable species of wildlife; and 6. To reduce the opportunities for the migration and distribution of undesirable weeds. The benefits of ecologically sound roadside management are several. These include the production of roadside vegetation that is maintained more eco- nomically than is the present case, better public relations, reduced envir- onmental problems from erosion, siltation, and possible misuse of herbicides, and better utilization of maintenance equipment. Alternatives to roadside vegetation by herbicides may, or may not, be less' costly. Initial costs may be higher, but when averaged over the estimated interval between maintenance activities. King County estimates that savings of from 10 to 442 may be realized by switching from spraying to backslope mowing. By suitable vegetation management, further savings could be realized. Specific Goals This study of the roadside vegetation of Jefferson County has the following specific goals. - 1. To survey and map the vegetation according to a classification scheme that will assist future management of these roads; i y Page 2 2. To analyze vegetational attributes relevant to the potential control of specific plants without herbicides; 3. To determine habitat types within which similar management practices may be applied; 4. To recommend treatment and management alternatives for management units identified; and 5. To recommend desirable experimental studies and suitable loca- tioas within Jefferson County. General Approach To my knowledge, there are no formulations for an integrated approach to the ecological management of existing roads. There are numerous studies, particularly in England and Germany, that concern roadside landscaping that emphasize minimum maintenance, but these depend upon the initiation of managed communities and planting mature shrubs and trees. There also have been studies of ecological right-of-way management in this country. The most notable of these are those of Frank Egler and his associates in Connecticutt. However, these have been concerned primarily with transmission corridores. Roadside management has been the provence of engineers, not ecologists. In preparing this report, I have needed to produce a synthesis of several disciplines, including theoretical plant ecology, biological control, turf management, landscape architecture, vegetation initiation techology, and mechanical control technology. I have not involved myself with the use of herbicides to control vegetation. I i We surveyed the roads of Jefferson County to observe the various types of problems that exist. I have considered various alternatives to control, but have stressed what I call "deflection". It far easier to use existing vegetation and modify it slightly than to impose control on the system. For each type of vegetation, I make management recommendations. In several cases, I list several alternatives and assess each. Difficulties I was faced with several difficulties in formulating recommendations. In several cases, experimentation is needed to test alternatives. Each species exists in a variety of roadside and ecological conditions. There- fore, combined strategies and local information are sometimes needed. In the time available for this report, and with the resources at my disposal, it is sometimes not possible to recommend one alternative over another with certainty. This problem is clearly the case in the case of horsetails. i 4 1 METHODS I Road Survey and Mai Following a prelims County personnel. I to the road survey using the species c Public Works. The identified using th This key is based p in a position or co Douglas fir (DF) se ment problem, while The key management (HT), Rubus spectab (RA), and Pseudotsa identified accordin Wet ditches with ei hardhack, were also forms. Data for the map wet noting, for 250 ft ; both sides. The dog per 1/2 inch on the be understood that i than this. Because odometers, and becai curacy is limited. to 0.2 mile, though Due to the large nun strategy. Symbols w placed in the approp to the tape to disti 'I 1 is provided as part The map and key can location of an area ticular site contain is recommended that smaller scale (e.g. Detailed Surveys Numerous detailed sus undersbanding of the mation about vegetati in the evaluation of form used for these c L Page 3 reconnaissance and discussions with Jefferson ided that the most efficient and useful approach to create a classification of management types dered to be major problems by the Department of sification consists of 24 types which can be readily chotomous identification key shown in Table 1. rily on vegetation in the right of way (ROW) and ion to be or become a management problem. Thus, ngs growing on the backslope may become a manage- se Df adults overhanging the road are not. ies are Equisetum arvense, the common horsetail the salmonberry (SB), Alnus rubra, the red alder anziesii, Douglas fir (DF). The habitat types are which combination of these species they contain. Typha letifolia, cattails, or Spirea douglasii, rtified. The remaining types are based on growth i 31lected by driving slowly down each road and 1 mile intervals, the type of vegetation on it type was mapped on a scale of one map unit ;est scale map (1 inch per 1000 feet). It should my cases, the vegetation is more heterogeneous map scale is awkward relative to automobile dometers may not be entirely accurate, map ac- i ols are located with an accuracy of from 0.05 ost cases they are exact. of types, the map was annotated using this 1 assigned to classes of types and tapes were e spot. Additional symbols were drawn adjacent sh among the types within a class. The key ppendix I, the annotated maps. sed by field workers to first locate the approximate cted for treatment and then to verify that a par- e species to be controlled. For this purpose it various map segments provided bp reduced to a ch per mile) for ease of use. c were made at selected sites to provide a better (side vegetation. These surveys provided infor- lynamics and structure. They were used to assist :a for future experimentation. Table 2 is the ations. ?l Matrix of Types A matrix to compare the types was prepared to s type (Table 4) . Mois tu from species compositio RESULTS Species Characteristics Equisetum arvense is am that readily regenerate Asexual shoots appear " Sexual stalks are unbr These stalks usually oc rootstock easily regene early in the spring. This species is a mana the road map and impedi information concerning - 'A variety of chemical Rubes spectabilis is a native to the Pacific N armed with thorns, and and Cronquist (1973). 3 meters (10 feet). It canopy. As Hitchcock dense thickets where no This species is capable to adjacent land. It lines. In some cases, from rootstocks. Sele shrubs (elderberry) or manage this species. in many places. Alnus rubra is a seral Often considered a was it is capable of symbio soil nutrients. Second alder for burning in e of this species appears major roads and the re Control may be attain the section by a regime a dense herbaceous cove P?_ distribution of management types over habitat ummarize the distributions of each management re status of each type was determined intuitively n and soil type in the detailed surveys. r i ong the world's worst weeds. It is a perennial s from rootstocks that are usually deeply buried. leafy" and are the type most commonly encounterdd. anched and are terminated by a spore bearing cone. cur in wetter habitats. When shoots are cut, the rates. The shoots die back each year, but regenerate gement problem because it is capable of disrupting ng drainage. I have been unable to locate any the biological or ecological control of horsetails. means are used. common deciduous shrub in the rose family that is orthwest. Stems are erect to drooping, only lightly usually more than 0.5 m tall, according to Hitchcock However, in very favorable locations it can exceed does best in moist woods that have a deciduous comments, "difficult to eradicate". It can create f controlled. of taking over rights of way 'and limiting access may, where very robust, interfere with transmission it may clog ditches. When cut, it often regenerates ctive cutting and the promotion of more favorable coniferous trees appear to offer the best way to It is possible that its control may not be necessary deciduous tree capable of rapid and tall growth. to tree, two virtues are now recognized. First, tic nitrogen fixation. Thus it is able to improve , several utilities are exploring the use of young lectrical generating plants. The major disadvantage to be its rapid invasion of the back slopes of duction of visibility associated with such invasion. d by first cutting larger trees and then maintaining of mowing. Invasion may be minimized by maintaining r. -? Page 5 Pseudotsuga menziesii is the most important commercial tree in western Washington. It is used for lumber, plywood, and Christmas trees. It becomes a management problem when seedlings invade open ROW. Cutting or pulling young plants and the encouragement of a dense low shrub-grass cover offer the best ecological approach to the control of this species. Map Summary P,zI The map (Appendix I) is designed to be advisory and to indicate general conditions with respect to each surveyed road section. The roads are described briefly here with respect to the general vegetational status. Details are provided on the maps. Roads are listed in numerical order and further identified by section or location where that is. appropriate. Secondary roads sometimes lacked two digit county designations; 4 digit designations are used for these. Possible management alternatives are noted. Road 4. a. Fort Flagler to Hadlock. This section contains much DF and RA. Removal by cutting or pulling followed by hydroseeding or planting of salal (Gaultheria shallon) is indicated. U k J 12 DF fairl heavy along with willow. Hadloc to ct. I Road 6. a. Parallel to State 104. This section contains RA and HT; the I shoulder will require grading and/or mowing to be maintained. Pulling of RA should control it. b. State 104 to Port Ludlow. This section is a difficult case. RA is abundant and often mixed with DF. SB and HT are minor problems. j Trees could be cut and the slopes hydroseeded to a grass-clover mix. I In sunny sections, whe;e SBbis common, vetch could be included. Road 8. Port Ludlow to St. 104. This section is drier than the previous and has only moderate RA and DF. HT is a minor component that may be controlled by blading or mowing. BB is short and does not appear to be a problem in this section. Road 9. HT are abundant in the northern portion of this road. RA and DF occur throughout the section and may be controlled by cutting, followed by seeding of grass-clover plus fertilizer to establish a dense turf. Road 10i a. From Jct. 10-12 to County 90. Here SB is tall and a problem. Mechanical clearing followed by promotion of other shrub species is pos- sible. HT is not common, but Senecio Jacobsen. (tansy ragwort) is abundant in places. b. Hadlock south. There is much DF here that will require hand clearing and promotion of salal to control. Hydroseeding with grass-clover mixes may be required in moist sections. Three miles S. of Hadlock is a section with HT and SB. The SB is short and on the backslope and is not a serious problem. The HT may be controlled by a combination of mowing and oyster shells. i J Bane 6 Road 12. a. Chimacum to St. 20. There are few problems in this section. DF occurs sporadically in sections and can be controlled by cutting followed by promotion of salal and grass cover. b. Chimacum south. HT and DF are scattered and can be controlle by mechanical means. SB is usually small and does not present major problems. Road 14.a.From Jct. 89 to State 104. There are few problems on this section. b. From St. 104 to end. No major problems here. Road 16. a. From Jct. 9 to the north. RA common, sometimes with DF. Salal may be promoted to control these species after cutting. This area could be used for a tree farm. b. From Jct. 9 to the south (Toanados Peninsula). This section is similar to above; the problems are minor since invasions are primarily on the backslope and well away from the shoulder. Road 18. a. Jct. 12 to Hadlock. Problems here are minor with some DF that could be cut and little HT. b. Chimacum to Hadlock. DF near Hadlock is the only problem; this can be controlled easily by cutting. c. Chimacum to Center. This long stretch is in generally good shape. Areas of HT could be controlled mechanically and treated with oyster shells. d. Center to St. 104. This section has a diverse mix of adverse types, particularly HT and SB. Combined strategies as will be discussed are needed. Hydroseeding also probably required in places. e. St. 104 to #3488. The roadside is wide and trees can be tolerated. HT and SB are abundant in the ditch. Mechanicca clearing and possible hydroseeding are indicated. f. #34880 to Quilcene. RA and DF are common and may be controlled by cutting and turf promotion. Senecio is also common in this section. Road 20. Bolton Peninsula. IIT may be controlled by repeated mechanical clearing and oyster shells. On drier slopes, grass turf can be promoted to control tree invasion after initial clearing. Road 22. West Valley Road. Some wetlands occur here with HT and tall SB which will require cutting and frequent mowing or blading. Moist slopes with RA may be managed by cutting followed by hydroseeding of grass- clover and nitrogen to prevent reinvasion. New cut banks have much HT and will require deep tilling and hydroseeding. Drier sections can be seeded to salal and grass mixes. Scotch broom should be left undisturbed. Road 28. Quilcene to Oyster Farm. HT can be easily managed using j mechanical means or with shells. Road 30. Lords Lake. Tall SB presents a problem, but can be handled mechically. Other shrubs can be promoted by fertilization after removal of SB. Other problems minor. Trees can be controlled mechanically. Road 34. West Uncus Road. HT is a problem that requires mowing and promoting of the existing vegetation, including clover. Section is relatively dry. Oyster shells may be applied. l I Page 7 Road 36. East Uncus Road. There are no significant problems in this area. I4I` Road 38. Port Townsend to Highway 12. There- are few problems near Port l Townsend. Conifers and RA occur in places that can be easily controlled. it The southern section could have RA removed with subsequent management for 1 DF as christmas trees. Road 40. Port Townsend to Road 98. Salal should be promoted in this section where tree growth is not desired. There is sporadic RA and DF, both of whtlh can be controlled mechanically. Road 52. Fulton Creek Road. DF and RA are common. This road should be managed for Ceanothus and Rhododendron dominance, with a grass-clover cover promoted at the grouWd level. Road 54. Duckabush River Road. Visability is not a large concern on this secondary road. DF, FIT, and SB all occur. SB may be cut with sedding and fertilizer used to establish a turf in the worst places. HT may be controlled i mechanically, while DF may be left or cut. Road 62. Lackawanna Beach Road. RA is the only problem on this road, particularly in cut banks. It may be removed mechanically and salal encouraged. Road 70. Dosiwalips Road. This road is in good condition. It is moist enough to promote a grass-forb cover by hydroseeding or fertilization in an attempt to control HT adn prevent woody plant invasion. RA and RU may be cut or pulled. Road 72. Wawa Point Road. There are no problems on this short road. Road 74. Jackson Cove to Whitney Point. Problems are minor and involve RA and DF, both of which can be controlled mechanically. Road 76. Fish Hatchery Road. There are no management problems on this road. Road 78. Penny Creek and Quilcene River Roads h • ere are a variety of prob- lems, mainly with trees. The shoulders are relatively feee and can easily b e so maintained by blading on this largely unpaved road. Mechanical con- trol of SB may be needed where it is tall and overhangs the road. Road 84. Just north of Quilcene. Vegetation is stable, with no problems. Road 86. Short road north of 84. No significant management problems. (toad 87. Connects Road 18 to State 20. S8 is common, usually away from shoulder. Brushing may be required. Shoulders should be mowed to maintain existing conditions. r Road 88. Rice Lake road. There are no management problems on this road. j j I Road 89. Beaver Valley to Center road. HT and SB may require clearing and -- - - -------------- Page 8 hydroseeding within the first mile. The rest of this road presents few difficulties, consisting of some invasion of tree species. In drier places, salal may be planted to stabilize the slopes against further invasions. Road 90. a. Road 22 to Road 12. Hardhack (Spires ) is present in the r wetter places, but there is little HT or SB. Areas of DF-RA can be managed for DF Christmas trees by cutting RA and by promoting salal. b. Road 12 to Road 10. This section has considerable con- centrations of all management species. Trees may be managed as above; HT could be controlled mechanically. The serious problems peesented by this section may involve hydroseeding near Road 12 to control SB and HT. Road 92. Crocker Lake Road. There are no problems on this road. Road 95. Road 12 to St. 20. DF invades dry, bare soils on this section. Control should involve proptotion of salal by fertilization after removal of trees. Near Chimacum, dry south-facing slopes require a grass cover to stabilize them and prevent DF invasion. The more moist north-facing slopes require only periodic cutting. Road 98. a. Willows to Road 40. RA and DF in this section may be cut, but Scotch broom should be retained. b. To Road 61600 (recorded as part of Road 98; actually a continuation of Road 40.) There is heavy DF invasion and some HT present. Salal should be promoted after removal of DF. c. To Jct. 38 (see previous note). This section is similar to section b. Though common, DF may not pose a problem and this is a good location to promote Christmas trees. Road 102. Near Eagle Creek. Problems on this road are minimal, though there is some HT invasion of road shoulders. Road 104. Near Gardiner. NT and RA may be bladed for control. Moist areas may require hydroseeding for control of HT and RA. Where tall grass exists, frequent mowing will enaourgge a closed turf. Note: The following roads do not appear to have 2 digit designations. 1 Road 22770. Near Jackson Cove. This area was clear cut and has extensive RA invasion, but it is not likely to be a management concern. Road 27890. Whitney Point Road. There are no problems here. Road 33010. Lindsey Beach Road. Problems here are minimal, with some DF invasion that could be cut; such sites should be managed to promote salal. Road 33280. Broad Spit Road. This side road contains some HT and RA. RA occurs where ground cover is dense enough to prevent regrowth. r Road 33610. Donovan Creek Road. There are no problems on this road. ? -.. = - - - raxu to oad 34370. Parallel to U.S. 101. a. North section, with some HT and 8 which can be dealt with mechanically. b. South section, which has some HT and SB, but not bad; mechanical leaning is possible. oad 34880. From Road 16 to Roadi.18. SB is tall and abundant on this Becton. fter cutting, hydroseeding and fertilization is required to attempt control. oad 35570. From Road 16 to Road 18 (north of 3488). SB is present but is t abundant or large. Mechanical control may be possible. - gad 35750. Tarbo Lake Road. There are few problems here, though some SB :curs. Mechanical clearing and the promotion of shade from overhanging nifers could control SB in this section. ad 37210. Gardiner Road, near Port Discovery. The mat can be maintained simple blading. ad 40390. New portion of Road 16. No current problems. This section 11 be discussed in the section on experimental plots. The old portion this road has dense HT throughout; it is discussed above. ad 40300. Hazel Point Road. This short road has no management problems. ad 409001 Zelached Point Road. DF present along this road, but it may controlled by mechanical means. ad 41410. Tabook Point Road. No serious problems on this short spur. ?d 42530. Dabob Road. SB and HT are bad here. Blading and mowing may ztrol HT; cutting SB and the promotion of an evergreen canopy may control ad 5-5714. No major problems on this section, though some HT is to be found. id 5-5825. No significant problems on this road. essment of Types: Shoulder miles in each type linear distance maintained in each type was calculated from the Id notes. The results are summarized in Table 3. es 1 to 8 contain HT and together represent 19.28 percent of the sample. alone is the most common type (U8), while HT t SB is the next most mon type. These two types will provide major challenges to herbicide- e management. The nrecenre ?f nrhn Page 10 ,. - - - ...___...,. ?.,. be left intact; mechanical clearing should be limited due to the fragility of the habitat. Types 10 to 13 plus types 2 to 4 contain RA. Most sections with alder are fairly open and grow alone (4.74X) or with DF (7.06%), All other RA types total only 4.5U of the total. Once eliminated from a section, the best strategies for RA control involve the development of dense turf to resist invasion. practices. Soil disturbance should be avoided in all management I Type 15 contains only s8 and consists of 8.59% of the total. Rubus spectabilis occurs with the other species, notably HT (4.847). SB occurs in a total of 18.162 of the roads. Type 16 is Pure Douglas fir and occurs widely in drier road sides (13.142). Much of this mil-age is not presenting serious safety problems. In total, DF occurs on 25.772 of the roads. The remaining types do not appear to offer any management problems, beyond routine mowing or brushing. The most common type to combine herbs, rather than distinguish between grasses Type Typean d 17+18 fo (rbsme, rged which + usually occur together. It is found on 31.60' of the roads. Open shoulders with herbs (Type 23) occupy most of the remaining roadsides (17.712). Thus it a ? ppears that about 44Z of the surveyed roads may require altered management practices. However, this value is probably too large since many miles can be controlled by existing non-chemical methods. Habitat Matrix Main roads and secondary'roads conditions. The main distinctionfisrInothehdegree tofilightiremtt d to reach the shoulders. This, in turn, g Permitted In Table 4, I have listed the habitat types in which each management type onThefieldhabitassesats These asst to c to(very dry) in ok light, soil five steps based and exposure into account. Some types show no differences betweenotyp of habitat, while others shift. The differences management practices in some cases. Provide clues to marnag Narrow roads do not provide the combination of mesic slopes, light and disturbance to permit all the species to occur. Rubus is generally lacking in open or dry habitats. Alder is present either on secondary roads where there is a good seed source or on bare, dry slopes in primary highways. Salal dominated roadsides (types 17, 18, and 19 in part) are more common in the drier habitats. Each of these features suggests ways to manipulate the species in question. These will be discussed in the recommendations. i s Page 11 i DISCUSSION Legal Questions g ac s opes is less obvious. Reduction of visual hazards (obscuring signs and intersections) and reduction of the probability of collisions with large wildlife are the two main reasons offered. The control of vegetation on road rights-of-way is undertaken to maintain roads in a safe condition, provide a shoulder that can be used by joggers, bicyclers, and pedestrians, prevent fire hazard, and reduce maintenance costs. Each of these functions relates primarily to the shoulder. Justi- fication for control of ve etation on the b k 1 There is a legal responsibility to prevent vegetation from growing over or on the road so as to impair driver direct line of sight, but there does not appear to be any legal responsibility to limit vegetation growing on the backslope. Therefore, the justification for the removal of alder and Douglas fir from the backslopes as a matter of course needs to be reexamined. Except where such growth would create visual hazards, the best management policy may be no management. Characteristics of Desirable Vegetation Wide roads with extensive back-slopes present different problems. There Ideal road side vegetation will be discussed for the major habitat types identified in Table 4. Narrow roads are often not paved and adjacent tree vegetation may make a nearly closed cover over the road. Under dry conditions, the ideal vegetation consists of a mixture of low shrubs and ferns on the shoulder or backslope and mixed conifers along the fringe. The road is easily maintained by grading as part of the normal physical maintenance of the road (unpaved) or by mowing the road margins. Mesic or wet narrow roads would have mixtures of white clover and forbs such as buttercups rather than the shrubs. Such vegetation can be main- tained easily by infrequent mowing and prevents invasion by horsetails. A coniferous canopy should -limit the growth of salmonberry. Page 12 Achieving these, or similar conditions will not be simple or easy. In most cases, where such conditions do not already exist, considerable manipulation will be required. Where horsetails and salmonberry already occur, it may prove difficult or impossible to achieve such goals. Possible Management Alternatives Here I summarize the non-chemical management alternatives that could by applied to particular habitats. Some are straight torward ana nave been # j .uggesred in the summary of road conditions, but others will require field tests before they can be recommended ith w out qualifications. Shoulder Management. Horsetails provide the main difficulty in management of shoulders, though other turf forming s ecies di p can srupt the mat. Where no vegetation is desired, as on some primary roads, there is no ecological means to achieve the goal. Limited spraying with chemicals other than 2-4-D and the use of soil sterilants may still be required. However, where some vegetation is toler bl a e, a number of manipulations are possible. 1. Mowing. Mowing can limit the growth of the tops of vegetation but , permits the buildup of roots and sod. The accumulation of sod may impede drainage and cause road dama O di ge. n rt roads, this method hay be suitable at a frequency of from 2 to 4 times per year. 2. Grading. Grading is much more expensive on roads where additional material must be added. On dirt roads and on gravel shoulders, this may be the most effective way to _emo h i ve orseta ls. Combined with other management practices, grading has its uses. Grading at a frequency of once per year also prevents the buildup of sod from other species. 3. Mechanical Barriers. It is possible that in the process of regrading or shoulder restoration, plastic or other pliable, inpermeable barriers can be placed beneath the road surface. This is an engineering question which I am not qualified to comment upon further. 4. Liming. Horsetails require acid soils for best growth. Therefore i , ncreasing the pH (making the shoulder less acid) should inhibit their growth and promote other, more favored species. In agriculture, increasing the pli is achieved by adding lime, but this is ex ensive A l j p . n a ternative may be to use a mulch of ground up oyster shells, which are, in fact , a form of limestone. When wet, this material may act as a cement to restrict water flow and it will alter the pH. Field trials of this suggesting would be required. However, Jefferson County appears to produce l arge quanti- ties of shell fish and there seems to be a large surplus of shells beyond those required for spat attachment. The use of shells may alleviate disposal. problems, be cost effective, and offers a good prospect of being able to reduce horsetail growth. 5. Fire. In many places, fires are used to control vegetation. This alternative is not recommended at this time. However, under closely 4 Fage 13 controlled conditions along wide highways with severe horsetail infestation, late summer shoulder burns may prove to be an efficient means of control. Such a program should not be undertaken without a thorough condideration of legal problems and a pilot experimental program. Ditches. Since the purpose of ditches is to carry excess water, they should not be clogged with any vegetation. Neither should chemicals be added to ditches. As in other Western Washington Counties, Jefferson County should maintain its ditches by mechanical clearing at required intervals. Cackslope Management. The backslope is highly variable in terms of light, moisture, soil type, and vegetation. However, management problems are not as great as the shoulder and King County has ceased its use of chemical sprays. The backslope may be managed to enhance the aesthetics of road- sides, improve wildlife forage, and reduce erosion. Existing vegetation may be managed to encourage stable vegetation with desirable qualities. Where bare road cuts or new construction result in opportunities for developing desirable vegetation, these opportunities should be siezed. In either case, desired goals must be determined prior to the start of j any manipulation program. 1. Mowing immature vegetation. Mowing is an effective way to control young woody vegetation where the grade is not steep. Annual mowing removes the need to remove dead woody vegetation. Initial hand removal may be necessary. Mowing the backslope is estimated to cost about $125 per shoulder mile (King County 1979 data). Mowing does not generally permit a stable vegetation to develop. More control may be achieved than is either required by law or desirable. A mixture of woody vegetation enhances forage for wildlife and creates visual diversity for motorists, bikers, and runners. t ' 2. Crushing older vegetation. Brushing permits the development of more mature and more diverse vegetation. Brushing may be practiced selectively to favor some species over others and to alter the competitive balances that may otherwise exist. Where there is a good cover of mixed vegetation or where slope conditions preclude mowing, brushing is a viable short-term alternative. It may also be used as part of a long term strategy to deflect vegetation to desirable forms. 3. Tree farms. Several road sections contain strong invasions of Douglas fir. Rather than treating these as a liability, they may be viewed as a { resource. Local groups of citizens, including conservation and youth organizations, might be contracted with to produce Christmas trees. A number of questions need to be considered by the County should this option be deemed viable. Should sections be completely harvested in series or should they be selectively cut? Will the production of these trees impact any local commercial tree farms? Where will cutting be permitted? The management map may be used as an indication of the locations and extent of available conifer growth. The types 1, 3, 5, 7, 10, 12, 14, and 16 all contain Douglas fir, with types 7, 12, and 16 offering the best opportunities. A - J Fage 14 4. Ecological control. Each site presents a unique combination of the local vegetation factors. A set of prescriptions must be based on It is generally not ind i . n m and must have a defined set of objectives 1000 effective control. However, with little effort ??---- feasible to produce beyond the initial stages, most sites can be developed into stable, with a variety of species. The prescriptions combine l aces interesting p re ite rro arations, and seeding uce o p p mechanical removal, s t the d eeding i endix (An a d pp . of vegetation desire -i of this report). Specific Recommendations Recommendations are provided in two ways. First, I will discuss alternatives ecies. There is ch s f p or ea by habitats; then I will discuss alternatives this organization, the reader may select: i n unavoidable repetition, but the data in a way convenient to his needs. Shoulders. As stated earlier, the shoulder presents the most difficult In others, desired i . s management problem. In many cases, no vegetation existing vegetation eventually forms ntrolled , even where horsetails are co adverse effects on the mat. h as a root mat that Narrow and dirt roads present fewer problems than shoulders of primary roads. rowth is relatively snow. d g Under dry conditions, there are few problems an tained as follows: i n Low volume secondary roads can be ma a narrow shoulder, or where there is no formal shoulder, light 1 With hould be art of p i ? ng s grading should suffice. On unpaved roads, such grad il little or no additional cost. t a normal road maintenance and should en 2. With a wider shoulder and adjacent to paved roads, mowing will control f clover and other t o vegetation if done 2 to 4 times per year. A dense ma ill form a root mat only slowly. Grading may forbs is desired since these w ntually to prevent their extension under thedroad. However, d { eve be neede a vigorous growth of forbis will suppress horsetails. 3. As roads are scheduled for repair and upgrading, special preparation of ith an impermeable the shoulder is indicated. A gravel skirt, underlain w il sterilent should be prepared to layer and (perhaps) treated with a so rowth of all species. Subsequent maintenance of the gravel h e g restrict t could be by light grading, oil, or burning. wide roads with both shoulders and ditches are likely to be invaded Paved free of horsetails. b , e by horsetails. Only extremely xeric conditions will but the following should be useful. uired e re , q Combinations of strategies ar 1. Frequent mowing, first to reduce the vigor of horsetails, and later to alvready practiced. i s maintain a forb community, is indicated where mowing be needed in combination with the 2. In critical locations, grading may uired at 5 year in- re b q e mowing. After initial grading, further grading may i11 tervals. 'f iF rr¢ _ ; z i Page 15 3. Where tree seedlings invade the shoulder, these may be controlled by mowing at 2 to 4 year intervals. 4. Experimentation should be undertaken to test the efficiency of the following treatments: a. Application of ground oyster shells to control horsetail growth. This material should increase pH and form a cement on the road shoulder, both of which would limit growth. Question to be ansWt"d_by s,,uqch., .r.esear-ch include: does. it. inrk? is. these an eQpnomical supply. or ahells,2,.._are there adverse side effects? b. Planting Agropyron.repens (quackgrass) to control horsetails. This species is a baa pasture"weea, but it is also a strong competitor and produces chemicals toxic to other plants. It is possible that this species could be used to form barriers to horsetail spread. Seed and rhizome sources are abundant in Jefferson County pastures. Questions to be answered by this research include: does the method work?, will the cure be worse than the illness?, will the widespread distribution of quackgrass meet with opposition from local farmers? 5. The use of chemical soil sterilents may still be necessary in the event that other manipulations do not maintain shoulders in desired conditions. Such use may be phased out as other methods of control are developed. Ditches. The ditch environment is not stable and not amenable to ecological control. Further, no herbicides are registered for use in ditches. Where ditches exist, I recommend that current practices be reviewed and that the frequency of mechanical clearing be either maintained at current levels 1 or, whereever possible, reduced. In eastern Jefferson County, many ditches serve their drainage function even when partially filled with vegetation. Clearing opprations should be concentrated in the fall, prior to the onset of seasonal rains. Annual clearing should be adequate'in most cases and in many cases less frequent clearing would be tolerated. Backslope. The County should review its current policy towards backslope management. Different backslope conditions require various management goals. On narrow roads, there is essentially no difference between shoulder and backslope management. Where shoulder management requires mowing or blading, no additional treatment of the backslope is required, with one exception. This is so because the backslope is narrow and effectively under the control of the surrounding vegetation. The exception involves Rubus spectabilis (salmonberry). Brushing or selective cutting is the best management option for this species. This management will improve the competitive abilities of other, more desirable species. In alternate years, this treatment may have to be repeated, but ultimately, the salmon- berry will be replaced. Whereever possible, evergreen species, including Douglas fir, should be encouraged on the land surrounding the ROW. i r ti L.? Page 16 on wide roads, there is usually an extensive backslope. Here, there are several relevant conditions. Dry cut banks are very unstable and any established vegetation such be encouraged. Species such as Scot's broom add nutrient and organic matter and thus help stabilize the road. Specific recommendations are: 1. Except where required by law, dry cut banks should have no vegetation removed. Productivity in such places is low and growth rarely a problem. Erosion and subsequent siltation of streams is a greater problem. 2. Where erosion is severe, hydroseeding with drought resistant grasses is recommended. Once established, two or tree mowings may be required to insure the development of a good sod. Less severe slopes maintain an adequate vegetation. These are generally open and maintain Douglas fir, red alder, or both. Specific recommendations are: 1.Where control of tree vegetation. is desired, trees can be removed by cutting. Care should beETaken?`Fscarify the soil since seeds of both species invade bare min4ral soil better than dosed vegetation. The ground cover should be encouraged to prevent tree reinvasion. Grasses and salal are the main species to be encouraged. Fertilization may be needed in some cases. 2. where salmonberry occurs, mechanical clearing, should be followed by fertilization to encourage competing shrubs. However, this species is usually low growing on dry rights of way and there brushing of growth where it encroaches the ditch may be employed. 3. These slopes are ideal for tree growth. Rather that expend effort to control such growth, many areas could be used to grow trees for either ornamental use or energy. Mesic, wide slopes are likely to have thick turf, which should be encouraged Salmonberry can be controlled if cut below the ground in a series of treatments. The thick ground cover will prevent reinvasion, or the slope can be controlled by mowing. In other respects, treatments are b h1 1 as for drier slopes. Selective brushing may be practiced, ut t s s not recommended. j These recommendations may be summarized and reiterated with reference to each species. Equisetum arvense. The main current alternatives to control horsetails are these: 1. Frequent mowing. While this will control shoot growth, growth of the rootstock will develop and permit the spread of horsetail under the mat. Eventually expensive repairs will be required. This method of control is recommended on dirt roads and where grasses and clovers can be grown"to help control horsetails. 2. Grading. This method may be used on dirt roads where it is part of the i j normal maintenance procedure for the road. Otherwise it is an expensive i r Page , 17 way to control plants. Grading is recommended only on dirt roads or where it is part of a road maintenance practice. 3. Chemical sterilents. While there is considerable opposition to the F,' use of such chemicals, hey may be the only feasible method to control horsetails. Because such chemicals are placed directly onto the shoulder and not sprayed, there is less danger in their use. Chemicals used are thought to be relatively safe and safer than 2,4-D or 2,4,5-T. There are several additional control options, but too little is known about how they might work under field conditions. These options include: 1. Mechanical barriers placed under the map. 2. Liming with oyster shells. 3. Use of fire or blowtorches (e.g. small flamethrowers). Each should be tested experimentally. Rubus saectabilis. The most favored condition for this species is an open road with a deciduous canopy under moist conditions. On dry slopes, or under open conditions, it does not appear to be a significant problem. 1. Large individuals should be cut at ground level without disturbing the surrounding species. Repeat this procedure at intervals of from 3 to 5 years. The salmonberry should eventually be replaced by other shrubs. 2. Combined with the previous practice, deciduous trees should be cut to permit canopy dominance by conifers. The lack of spring light mater- ially reduces the growth potential of salmonberry. Where salmonberry infestaticm•is great, an alternative may be tried in experimental conditions. The entire slope may be bladed to remove all shrubby vegetation. The slope is then hydroseeded with a mixture of grass, clover, and vetch to establish a turb resistant to reinvasion by shrubs (or trees). The initial expense wo51d be large, but may pay in the long term. Under dry conditions, salmonberry is generally small. Under such conditions I, no control or periodic brushing is all that appears to be required. Seeding of vetch following selective removal of salmonberry is a method that could be tested to reduce the salmonberry. Alnus rubra. Alder invades where there is open soil and plenty of light. It is common on mesic and dry sites. Routine shoulder mowing will control this species. Recommendations for control on the backslope are: 1. Where the removal of alder is desired, it should be hand cut. Slopes y should then be treated to promoue a closed ground cover. In many cases, no further treatment will be required since the existing vegetation will keep alder seedlings from becoming established. However, where cover is not dense, hydroseeding may be required to produce the dense turf. E f Page 18 2. Where safety concerns permit, alder may be left to grow on the rights of way without any effort to control. 3. On good sites, alder may be harvested periodically and used for generating energy in a variety of ways. The U.S. Dept. of Energy may be interested to a proposal for a demonstration project concerning the potential of rights of way (roads) as energy farms. Pseudotsuga menziesii. Much 66 the discussion of alder applies to Douglas fir also. These species often invade together (Type 12). On shoulders, periodic mowing easily controls this species. On the backslope, there are several recommendations. 1. Seedlings and saplings may be removed manually. I recommend that on the first removal cycle plants taller than 2 to 3 feet be cut, taking care to minimize habitat disturbance. During the time until a second cut, there should be little invasion in most habitats, and the remaining plants are removed. 2. In drier habitats, hydroseeding may be required to establish an invasion resistant ground vegetation. 3. In locations where seedlings are well formed, harvesting may be contracted to groups interested in selling Christmas trees. This recommendation was dislcussed previously. Senecio acobaea. The tansy ragwort was not a specific concern of this study. Nevertheless we noted that it has invaded in many roadsides and it may soon become a target of herbicide control. Tansy in the ROW is of little concern. However, roads offer corridores for the plant to spread to pastures. This species is toxic to lifrestock and presents an economic liability. biological control using the cinnabar moth ( rea Jacobaea) has been introduced with only moderate success. It suffers t from indigenous parasites that reduce its reproductive success.- Other species, such as a seed fly (Pegohylemyia seneciella) -and a flea beetle (Longitarsus jacobeana) are undergoing tests. At present biological control is not operational, but the situation could change at any time. Experimental Sites The following locations are suggested as locations for experimental trials. They are listed according to the species under study. Equisetum arvense. Rd. 22, near Chimacum, Rd. 89, near Beaver Valley, Rd. 16, new sections with invading horsetails. Other sites should be selected close to study areas for other species. 1 Rubus spectabi.lis. Rd. 18, from Center to 104, Rd. 18 from St. 104 to f Jct. 34880 (north of Quilcene), Rd. 34880, Rd. 89. l? Alnus rubra. Rd. 18, between Center and 104, Rd. 18, between 104 and 34880, Rd. 16, from its jct. with Rd. % north, Rd. 27770, near Jackson Cove (clear cut), Rd. 38, .3 mile west of Rd. 12. A variety of conditions and combinations are available on these sites. Pseudotsuga menziesii. Rd. 18, from Center to Rd. 34880, Rd 16, Rd. 40 near the golf course, Rd. 95 near Chimacum, Rd. 22 near Chimacum, Rd. 42. Recommended Experiments j Throughout this report, I have made suggestions concec'ning experiments that need to be accomplished. In this section I will outline specific tests and suggest typical locations in which they could be conducted. Control methods for Equisetum arvense. There are several potential ways to control this species. Each should be tested and compared to proven methods using chemical soil sterilents. The best localities for these experiments appear to be on Rd. 89 between Beaver Valley and Center, on the West Valley Road (022) near Chimacum, and in several places along Road 18. The details of experimental design are beyond the scope of this report. Along stretches of paved road in dry and moist conditions, test strips containing horsetails should be marked and described. The following treatments should then be applied to one or more strips: - 1. mowing at several levels of intensity, 2. blading or scraping, followed by mowing, I 3. blading, followed by hydroseeding of a forb mixture (where vegetation 4 will be desired ), I 4, mowing and/or blading followed by the application of lime or oyster shells, C s 5. application of approved chemical sterilents, and f 6. application of a plastic barrier strip beneath gravel. This experimental set needs to be conducted for at least one year. Control methods for Rubus spectabilis. Several specific experiments are proposed for salmonberry: 1. the effects of vetch on salmonberry should be tested where the vetch occurs in strong concentrations. Rd. 6 north of Port Ludlow and Rd. 9 south of St. 104 are two possible locations. Rubus should be cut, followed by heavy seeding of vetch. 2. undcr moist coodiKiwis•, e.g. on Rd. 10 north of Mats Mats Bay, the t effects, of cutting salmonberry at the ground level must be tested. 3. in the same location, the effects of cutting plus fertilizer to in- courage other shrubs should be tested, 4. around Rd. 34880, the effects of cutting salmonberry followed by heavy hydroseeding to turf species should be tested, 5. the long term effectiveness of herbicide treatment should be monitored in recently sprayed sites, 6. the effectiveness of fire to control salmonberry may be desired, but I do not recommend this experiment at this time. k . i err ??. - I P ape 20 or A uora. Red alder ma problem. A redefin iti a on of y, or ma such that the s the importance of this y ROt, be a management l be viewed species is recom in some cases th as c e e mended, s ecies P still re a resource, not a ntsuiis ance. however, site may prove to be Rd. 27770, 9uires removal. The bes recent cl near n ear cut. This area Cove Sle research .ffi of alder. which traverses a On shoulder s, this species is a and heavy infestations means, The experiments are directed a l ontrolled by 1• t contr cu ttin alder wi ical a? o 2• cut alder no further t the c th reatment, and hydroseed ? to establish a closed • b urn the backslo e, turf, and safety P followed by hydrose c d e in onsiderations permit such 8 (reommeaded only 4• no Y if legal action, followed b an experiment) by a su r , oadsides, rvey of public opinio n on the state of the The last alter native should be directed such as roads 16, 1g, at a hi 22, and St. 104 8h volume road pr r the feasibili C . t oads, y of using rights of wa ounty staff should also invests of Center is an additional location re ener gate SY farms. Rd carried 18 h n h . w out e , south in coordination with e entsese experiments mi 8ht be on other Control methods for Pseudotsu species. by careful a menziesii ! cuttin . Douglas fir can be controlled habitats need to close to the ground • be examined. In The effects of cutti it, mesi d „ c habitats, ry habitats, ng in selected grasses and salal should be promoted listed below should b can be r v s , p omoted. e carried out in slopes are mesic in least Each experiment at places, rd ?'o habitat types dry, . 16 on th Rd , . , 22 e Toandos Peninsula is 1• cutting Douglas fi generally r 2• , with no further cutting, followed by h treatment d 3 , y roseedin • cutting, 4 plan fertilization to g to establish a thick to . cutti encourage rf n8, plus plantin existin S g or seedin s.l g vegetation, , establish a Christmas tree fa g alal, .6 no ;I rm, action, with public survey as in #4, above . Reestablishment of Ve o elation. Several r are b eing reconstructed roads are d v I . un er construction n e cases, egetation. These locations sh ouldsbe aeededthere is species. In d little existing to Y locati a desirable mix of should be sowni ons, clover, drought In moist locations, tolerant grasses, and salaI and, perhaps a mix vet f , o ch should be clover, mesophytic as soon as possible to sown. These treatments grasses, prevent undesi should b d The servi one rable ces of a speci the Count firm specializing in hydroseedins from establiah{ng, Y lacks the ex pertise to plan this Program8 might be obtained if . f : ---------- __ ._, I Page 21 SUMMARY The roadside vegetation of Jefferson County.was surveyed. It was determined that about 44% of the surveyed shoulder miles contain one or more management target species, but that in much of this distance, the species creates only minimal problems. A map of 24 management types is presented that shows the location and extent of each type. The types are based on combinations of the four r management species. Douglas fir and alder should be controlled without chemicals and recom- mendations aYc made about practices to effect permanent control. However, both species have the potential to be valuable, rather than liabilities. Due consideration should be given to the practicality of establishing Christmas tree and energy farms on rights of way. Salmonberry does not 'appear to be a problem in much of its range. Only where it can grow tall does it create difficulty. Mechanical control is possible, but needs to be frequently repeated. Experimants are proposed to test the efficacy of the recommended cultivation methods. Relaxing standards of vegetation control on rights of way would reduce the maintenance costs associated with this species. Horsetails present an almost intractable problem. This species is the only one that is a demonstrable problem nearly everywhere it grows. Several test recommendations are made, but it shou.d-be. recognized that soil sterilents may be the only effective way to control this species other than extremely expensive regrading. I Tansy ragwort was not a specific concern of this study. However, control i ; efforts should be directed at this species while it is relatively uncommon. Mowing prior to seed set may reduce its rate of spread; biological control . methods are still problematic. Areas completely devoid of vegetation should be carefully examined and a vegetative goal determined based on habitat conditions, surrounding vegetation, and design constraints. Hydroseeding to produce dense, low vegetation to resist the invasion of alder, Douglas fir, and salmonberry ,w is recommended where economically feasible. °i r % 1 22e 22 i- , TABLE 1. Complete key to the vegetation types recognized for management purposes. This is a dichotomous key; at each step, the presence or absence of a key species is noted and you proceed to the next step. The types are as follows: Type 1 contains Equisetum,.Alnus, Rubes, and Douglas fir (conifers). Type 2 contains Equisetum, Alnus, and Rubes. 3 contains Equisetum, Alnus, and conifers. Type 4 contains only EquiseType tum and Alnus. Type 5 contains Equisetum, Rebus, and conifers. Type 6 con- tains Equisetum and Rebus. Type 7 contains E vise Type 8 q tum and conifers, and contains only q isetum. Type 9 recognizes extremely wet habitats, characterized by cattails (y2ha), hardhack (S irea), or both. This type is simply noted in the appropriate locations next to other map symbols on the map. Type 10 has Alnus, Ruhus, and conifers. T}pe 11 has Alnus and Rebus. Type 12 has both tree species, Alnus and Pseudotsuea (conifers). Type 13 has only Alnus. Type 14 has Rubes and conifers, while Type 15 has only Rubus. Type 16 contains only conifers, nearly always Douglas fir. The remaining types are characterized by growth forms and their location. Types 17 and 18 both have a shrubby backslope and the ditch and shoulder dominated by grasses (Type 17) or forbs (Type 18). These types were f mapped together because grasses and forbis often intermixed. Type 19 J I was similar, except that the ditch or shoulder had shrubs or, rarely, small tree seedlings. f ? Types 20 - 22 have tree-dominated backs lopes. These types usually are on narrow roads, where the domination comes from overhanging trees, that trees growing in the ROW. Type 20 has r shoulders, type 21 has forb dominated shoulders, and type dominated ems 22 has. shrub dominated shoulders. Type 23 is free from problems and the backslope is herb dominated. ? Type 24 is recorded where there is no vegetation or the vegetation is privately maintained (e.g, lawns), { { I 6 Page 24 TABLE 2. Field data sheet for detailed site survey. This form provides ' an analysis of the degree of disturbance, habitat characteristics, surrounding landuse, and a detailed description of the vegetation in i different parts of the right of way. (Following page I k. i ti i ? I i u.. r„aa Y ? f urf• i J' . ' FIELD CHECK LIST Highway: Odometer; I I. VEGETATION PLOT NUMBER: Recorder: Date: i E ,ht : h1gt, Type: I Equisetum (Horsetail) j Alnus rubra (Alder) Rubus spectabilis (salmon berry ) Pseudotsuga menziezii (Douglas Fir) Ferns GRASS Forbs Low Shrubs High Shrubs Other Deciduous Trees ! Other Conifers i i Other Types i II. Percent Natives Percent Introduced III. Utility Line: Left Right IV. Stable, en'd point: I V. Slope: Left Level Up Down Right Level UP Down VI. MOISTURE: Left: Hot,dry; dry; mesic;cool mesic; moist; wet,drained; bogF Right:Hot,dry; dry; mesic;cool mesic•moist; wet drained; bogg} VII. SOIL TYPE: Glacial outwash; gravel; coarse sand; sand, loam; ' silt; clay; organic; peat. Cut bank; natural surf ace VIII. Surrounding landscape vegetation E" i IX. Special or critical features (note Rubus height): X. Comments on possible management; special problems on this type i I C i K5 _ ,.. _ Page 26 . i TABLE 3. Shoulder miles of surveyed roadside covered by each vegetation type discussed in text (Jefferson County, Washington). Total miles ? survey was 405. MANAGEMENT TYPE SHOULDER MILES PERCENT 1. All species 2.6 .64 2. HT, RA, SB 2.7 .67 3. HT, RA, DF 2.8 .69 4. HT, RA 6.0 1.48 5. HT, SB, DF 5.7 1.40 I 6. HT, SB 19.6 4.84 7. HT, DF 7.7 1.90 8. HT 31.0 7.66 S 9. Typha, Spires 3.8 .94 . 4 10. RA, SB, DF 2.6 .64 11. RA, SB 1.6 .39 12. RA, DF 28.6 7.06 13. RA 19.2 4.74 14. SB, DF 4.0 .99 15. SB 34.8 8.59 16. DF 53.2 13.14 17.- 18. Shrub-Herb 128.0 31.60 19. Shrub-Shrub 17.6 4.34 ° 20 - 21. Tree-herb 2.5 .66 22. Tree-shrub 0.2 .04 23. Herb 71.7 17.71 24. Other (urban, new road) 6.9 1.70 II , a i TABLE 4. Matrix of habitat types and road conditions. Management Type HABITAT CONDITIONS Narrow Roads Wide Roads - .............. a ?..ao..?_..D..... ...... ., ......A _.B...C .. D.. z... 1. All .. 2. HT, RA, SB X X X 3. HT, RA, OF X X X X X X 4. HT, RA X X X X X X X 5. HT, SB, DF 3C X X 6. HT, SB X X X X 7. HT, DF X X X X 8. HT X X X X 9. Typha X X X X 10- RA, SB, DF X X - 11. RA, SB X X X 12. RA, OF X X i 13. RA X X X X X X X l 14. SB, DF X X 15. SB X X X 16. DF X 'X X X X X 17 - 18. Shrub X X X X Herb X % l 19. Shrub-Shr X X X 20 - 21. Tree- X x x He rb 22. Tree-shrub 1 X 23. Herb X X X 24. Other X X X X X X X X X Key: HT horsetails; RA . red alder ; SB salmonberry; DF - Douglas fir: A wet; B moist; C intermediate (mesic); D • dry; E very dry (xeric). 7 I r ti J Page 28 BIBLIOGRAPHY - Asbaugh, F. A. 1968. Convert ROW from woody to herbaceous cover . Electrical World, p. 63. Bazzaz, F. A. 1969. Succession and species distribution in relation to erosion in southern Illi i f no s. Trans. Ill. St. Acad. Sci. 62:430-435. Chappell, W. E. 1969. Brush control in rights of way. Proc. South . Weed Sci. Soc. 22:277-282. Conover, H. H. 1977. Grounds maintenance handbook (Third edition). McGraw- Hill Book Co., New York. Hackett, B. 1972. Landscape development of steep slopes. Oriel Press , Newcastle, Great Britain. Heath, M.E., D. S. Metcalfe, and R. E. Barnes. 1973. Forages. Iowa State University Press, Ames. Hitchcock, C. L. and A. Cronquist. A flora of the Pacific Northwest i . University of Washington Press. Seattle. i i Holm, L. G., D. L. Plunknett, J. V. Pancho, and J. P. Herberges 1975 ' i . . The world s worst weeds. University of Hawaii Press, Honolulu. ? ! King, E. J. 1966. Weeds of the world. Interscience Publ. Co., Inc. New York. 1 Madison, J. H. 1971. Practical turf grass management. Van Nostrand- I Rheinhold Co., New York. + Niering, W. A. and R. H. Goodwin. 1974. Creating relatively stable f # shrubland with herbicides: arresting succession on rights of way and pasture lands. Ecology 55:784-795. Snow, W. B. 1959. Highway and the landscape. Rutgers Universit Pres y s, New Brunswick. Swan, D.G., I.E. Foote, T.M. Evans, R.L. Berger, and W.E. Currie 1976 . . Weed control on rights-of-way. Washington State University Coop. Extension Service Bulletin 669. Washington State University, Cooperative Extension Service. 1978. Biological weed control. EM 3826 (SR). Williams, E. D. 1977. Biologg.add control of perennial weeds: Equistum arvense (fi ld h i i e orsetail. Weed Abstracts 26(7):219. i I •r, Y ® 5 HT SB DF v/ 6 HT SB. W 7 HT DF 8 HT V,11005 9 TYPHA or SPIREA ®®®® W ® 10 RA SB DF ` / 11 RA S B ® 12 RA DF ®®®®. 13 RA I®I®I® ® 14 SB DF ® 15 RA 16 DF 17 t 18 Shrub/herb + ® 19 Shrub/shrub 20 Tree/grass 21 Tree/forb 22 Tree/shrub R1.RNK 23 All herbaceous 24 None of the above Fey: HT horsetails (Equisetum arvense ; SB salmonberry (Rubus j suectabills); RA - red alder (Alnus rubra ; and DF Douglas fir f (Pseudotsfiua menziesii). L? Page 30 - -? A P P E N D I X I I I i HYDEOSEEDING: SPECIES ADAPTABLE TO USE IN LOWLAND PUGET SOUND Hydroseeding is the application of a mixture of seed, fertilizer and mulch in a slurry. This method is rapid, economical, and effective. Typical coverage rates are from 2 to 4 acres (about 40,000 to. 180,000 square feet) per day. On a 20 foot bank, this is about one shoulder mile. A tank may contain 1000 gallons of water, 20 pounds of seed, 100 Bounds of 16-20-0 fertilizer and 300 pounds of cellulose fiber mulch. Seedbed preparation, including liming and rough tilling, is essential to ensure good establishment. The most efficient way to hydroseed is to use a mixture of seed species. This produces a more complex community, safe-guards against the failure of one species, and produces a mosaic suited to the given conditions. Potential Species and Their Characteristics There are many species used in highway maintenance. I recommend that a j mixture of grasses and legumes be used routinely in any reseeding program. The particular species should be selected in consultation with the county Extension Agent, the Washington State University Cooperative Extension Service, or private hydroseeding firms (see list of contacts, Appendix III). - The following list of species is provided to guide the County officials in the range of available species and their characteristics. ` Grasses it I Agrostis stolonifera- creeping bentgrass. This is a sod-forming species that is highly variable and has many varieties and cultivars. Useful it ' I is in mixtures, but it is rarely yised along roads. ? Agrostis tenuis - colonial bentgrass. This species is common in pastures. It can form a closed cover quickly, but can be invaded when mowing or grazing is limited. Poa pratensis - Kentucky bluegrass. This desirable perennial readily forms sod. Variety Newport, produced in Oregon, is well-adapted to local conditions and to a variety of conditions of light and moisture. It does well where soil fertility is low and is ideal for bare road cuts. Festuca rubra - red fescue, or chewings. This species is often used in combination with Kentucky bluegrass. The fescue is tolerant of dry, shady conditions. It is a buncligrass, but there are creeping varieties for roadsides. Festuca arundinacea - tall fescue. This species is both disease and drought resistant and grows will in mixtures with other grasses. Lolium perenne - perennial ryegrass. This grass is ideally suited to our climate, but requires rather heavy fertilization to become well established. When mixed with bluegrass, it is useful in erosion ocntrol and resists the invasion of trees through both competitive and allelopathic means. Page 31 A good mixture of grass species would include Agrostis tenuis, Poa pratensis, Festuca rubra, and F. arundinacea. Together, these species can gwow in most conditions found along lowland roads in Jefferson County. I Other species ? It is recommended that all seeding operations include an appropriate legume. Two species should be of value in this regard. Trifolium repens (white clover) is a species that holds the soil well, is resistant to mowing, and improves the soil be virtue of nitrogen fixation. Vicia sativa (common vetch) is a European species that occurs in open area, often climbing on shrubs or fences. It can form dense clusters and should be encouraged along residential and farm areas, as much for its beauty as its apparent ability to limit salmonberry. There are numerous other species that might be encouraged or planted. these include: Ranunculus spp.(buttercups). These species occur naturhlly along many road shoulders in mesic areas and should generally be promoted. i Phalaris arundinacea (Canary reed grass). This species might be sown in wet places, particularly where horsetails occur. It is naturalized in Jefferson county in scattered locations. It forms a sod and may prove useful against horsetails in the wetter places. Agropyron repens (quack grass). This species is among the world's worst weeds and is prevalent in pastures in Jefferson County. However, it is also an extremely agressive and phytotoxic species. Moist, open banks in non-agricultural situations might be planted to this species to help control the invasion of woody species and, possibly, to control horsetails. Holcus lanatus and H. mollid (velvet grass). Though these are both lawn weeds, they are useful to stabilize light sandy soils in shady conditions. Phleum pratensis (timothy). This common weed and pasture grass forms dense tufts. When mixed with other grasses, it is useful to stabilize heavy soils. Achilles millefolium (Yarrow). This species is highly variable and forms stabilizing mats of fibrous roots in sandy, poor, dry soils. Cytissus scoparius (Scot's broom). This shrub is useful for erosion control, soil stabilization and soil improvement. It should not be removed. Ceanothus app. This group of species can be mass planted on dry slopes where they can be expected to form stable thickets and resist tree invasion. Holodiscus discolor (ocean spray). This attractive species should be en- couraged whereever it occurs. Gaultheria shAllon (salal). This species should always tae encouraged. It is mildly phytotoxic and often forms dense thickets that prevent tree invasion. It can be planted under some circumstances. Jj e j' l i v ?' P ? ?`.i y .<??C 3 . 1 ? •? I __ ._ ? , i; ;'. Y 1 i ROADSIDE VEGETATION MANAGEMENT WITHOUT HERBICIDES GLAIR WOLELEY Jefferson County Exrens?on Service Port Townsend Woshingion What is Jefferson County's Roadside Vegetation Management Program? i Many individuals have summarized the Jefferson County Roadside Management Program simply as a "no spray" program. Although the Jefferson County ComiSSioners 444 declared a moratorium on roadside spraying in 1978, to describe this effort simply as "no " spray underestimates the overall program objective and the complexity of its achieve- ment. The morotorium and revised vegetation control program was the beginning of a county effort to reduce chemical usage in areas draining toward privote wells and to reduce county exposure for damage claims alleged to result from chemical application along county rood right-of-woys. The present roadside vegetation management system being applied in Jefferson County is based on a 1979 consultant report from Dr. Roger z' del Moral of University of Washington, Deportment of Dotony.' The primary goal of the program as outlined by del Moral is to produce relatively stable plant communities which require little maintenance and which possess other _ desirable traits. Program application is intended to accomplish the following six general goals. 1 . To economically insure the efficient and safe operation of roods: ?- 2. To produce naturalized vegetation on the right-of-way that is self-sustaining and which blends into the surrounding vegetation; :f 3. To control erosion from slopes and cut banks: 4. To produce an aesthetically pleasing right-of-woy; 1 5. To provide cover for desirable species of wildlife: and _ 6. To reduce the opportunities for the migration and distribution of undesirable weeds. Dr. del Moral has made recommendations for control and elimination of problem or s invosive plant species. His recommendations have not included the use of herbicides as a primary method to control or manage roadside vegetation. Thus the term --no spray" .f program. ; PRESENT APPLICATION The current Jefferson County Roadside Vegetotion Management Program is a mix of seven techniques which are applied in varying degrees depending upon specific vegeto- tion problems. These techniques include: mowing, manual control, mechanical brush cutting, air sowing, grading, application of soil sterilonts, and hydro-seeding. Mowing. The use of mechanical mowers to controk gross and immature woody vegetation is the most widely used management technique in the county's program. Virtually all county rood shoulders and accessible bocllslopes ore mowed. The mowing has proven relatively successful. The mowing controls many young woody plants and annual weeds. The grassy shoulders ore aesthetically pleasing when f mowed, and the mowing seems to stimulate spreading of the gross, which helps to control erosion and provides competition for weedy species. - ' 'del Moroi. Roger Ecolooscol Control nl Rnnrls,de Veaotorion. October 24 1979. Jefferson County Public Wodrs Deportment. Pori Townsend. WA 98308 31 puqes - I r, , .55. Drawbacks to mowing include necessary repetition when grosses are actively growing and the necessity to make multiple passes with the mower when shoulders are uneven and/or have steep drainage ditches. The invosion of low spreading grasses and weeds into asphalt pods is an addit ionol problem. Mechanical Brush Cutting. Brush cutting has been used extensively along county roads where brushy species create a problem of limited visibility and/or encroachment toward the asphalt or grovel surface. Operation of the brush cutter is a slow and expensive process. Machinery maintenance costs are high. Some aesthetic problems ' have resulted from brush cutting operations, especially when cutting is done near rural residences and private drives where individuals prefer the "green look." Rapid regrowth resulting in a greening effect usually relieves any browning or tree stoning effects of the brush cutter. Brush cutting needs con usually be met with annual treatment. "Air Saw." The "air sow", which is o long ormed sow used from an aerial bucket, has been used to trim bock lateral limb growth and excessive heights of older and fir growing on bockslopes and right-of-ways. Alder seems to be a major problem because of its tendency to grow toward the open space of the county roods. Use of the "air sow" and accompanying chipper is slow and expensive. A crew of five to six people, which includes flog personnel, is required for the operation. Safety of operation crew is a major consideration. Use of the "air sow" has been relatively effective, but without complete removal of many of the mature trees, the operation must be repeated approximately every other year. In many problem areas. a considerable portion of the work is done by power and phone line crews doing line maintenance work on service lines adjacent to county roods. The major portion of county roads is not closely bordered by mature stands of older and lot fir and thus does not require the "oir sow" operotion. Manual Control. Manual control has been employed as a manual means of cutting bock and pulling invasive problem plants such as older, salmonberry, and blackberry. In the three years previous to 1982. Jefferson County applied the technique of manual control to a total of 75 centerline miles. The work was contracted to private professional crews at an average cost of $240.00 per centerline mile. The work was satisfactory but G > appears that it must be repeated on a limited basis every two to three years until competing vegetation essentially chokes out the problem species. No estimation is available as to the length of time necessary to achieve this result. Manual control is con- sidered by the county as the most effective long-term means of control in many situations (i.e. fir, cedar, hemlock). Employment of high school summer help in the 1982 season indicates that the job of hand thinning and selective elimination of problem species requires o significant amount of training to insure the use of proper selective cutting and thinning techniques. The hiring of local citizens meets with community support as o means of keeping county dollars in the local economy. Budget limitations hove severely restricted the application of the hand thinning operation during 1982. Grading. The use of grading roadside shoulders and ditches to control problem vegetation was suggested by Dr. del Moroi and has been employed only as it is coherent with annual maintenance of grovel surfaced roods and drainage ditches. Major draw- backs in using groding for vegetation control include deterioration of shoulder berms with continued groding and increased erosion from loosened soil. Concern for increased turbidity of runoff water into Ickes and streams has been expressed by fisheries per- sonnel. County rood deportment personnel view grading as a physical maintenance operation and not as a vegetation control measure. cR 7 Soil Stealonm Dr. del Moral addressed the problem of gross and weed encroach- men( along roadway edges. His conclusion was that in situations where no vegetation is desired there were "no ecological means to achieve this goal." del Moral suggested that limited spraying with chemicals other than 2.4-D and the use of soil sterilonts may still be required. In an effort to eliminate the encroachment of spreading grasses and weeds along and under the immediate edge of asphalt surfaces, the county. experimented in 1981 with the heribicide Karmex. A one foot sterilant strip was sprayed on roadway shoulders immediately adjacent to asphalt edges. This process eliminated the majority of gross and weed problems. Problem weeds not eliminated were plantain and dandelion. Fall 1982 and spring 1983 spraying will incorporate the use of o chemical called Krovor which is expected to effect a better kill on the plantain and dandelion, Hydro-Seeding. Hydro-seeding has been used on new rood construction oreas where disturbed soils. cutbanks, and backslopes have been left bore of vegetation. Hydro-seeding is a process of high pressure application of a gross seed and mulch slurry. Although hydro-seeding is relatively new for Jefferson County, it appears very satisfactory in eliminating through competition the problem vegetation, especially older. A SUMMARY OF THE PROGRAM Perhaps the greatest immediate fault with the current vegetation control program is its apparent inability to control problem weeds. Prior to 1982, the county had attempted to control the most undesirable weeds, such as Tansy Rogwort, with spot hand pulling. In 1982, with Tansy Ragwort intermittently scattered along most county roads. the road deportment under severe budget problems was forced to abandon the hand pulling of the problem Tansy. At present, the weed problem outside the one-foot sterilant buffer and beyond the reach of the mower has been ignored. In defense of this action, three factors are significant. First, Jefferson County has not activated o weed control district and thus no legal obligation exists. Second. a high per- centage of county roads are remote and for removed from agriculture production areas. A third factor is that the del Moral program suggests that weed problems will be brought under control as desirable vegetation eventually establishes. This is expected to be a long term-term process and present existing weeds will eventually be eliminated. In summary, the Vegetation Management Program for Jefferson County can be de- scribed as a program in transition. Many of the "no spray" efforts have proven successful at least on o short term basis. It must be remembered that the establishment of a stable low maintenance vegetation along county roads is a long-term process. This process will theoreticaly require o greater investment in early years with maintenance costs tapering off as the control vegetation establishes and maintenance becomes less. Techniques such as mechanical brush cutting and "air sowing" would be necessary g" with herbicide programs as well as "no spray." The term "no spray" has become o popular descriptor of the vegetation control effort. "No spray" also appears in transition. The one-foot sterilont buffers ore an exception to o strict "no spray" program; however, not on unexpected exception according to del Moral's report. County Commissioners express the moratorium on spraying not as o bon on future application of herbicides but ? " as o time to rethink the process and review the alternatives; o time to determine areas p where herbicides can be used when necessary without endangering nearby domestic water sources and gardens. At present, the public works department is planning a classk ficotion of county rood segments by occeptable and/or necessary vegetation control method Many of the experimental efforts suggested by del Moral's study have yet to be -57- L? I J I tested. Budget conuoints will undoubtedly dictate a long-term selective process of applying these alternatives. At present, the overall Vegetation Management Program might be termed on experimental effort. Although the majority of county residents seem very supportive of the effort. Jefferson County is not advertising the effort as "the way-for other counties to go in vegetation management. The benefit cost ratio for the program appears to be acceptable at present. Budget constraints may curtail some efforts in the future and necessitate o review of alternatives. In summary. Jefferson County's program is like every other counry's. We ore all trying to do a better job to keep more people happy for less money. ? d_ '?iC?..c S?Qz'-J't G.G?-? /???"?" _ ?it'-ri'? 5?•-?S G'? ??S' 4 G cry ; ?e l? , /A; '0 /c,',? ? ?? ? - ?/z?- ors G'?N? ? ?f1??" 1?=?'r?' S? rTrr-?r???'L- ? -??-?s- ?f ?'' j?`e?'?.'?t ?g-?( ?2o fC?l G?/'?' ?`e" °(? ?'`b/ c ?,L.Qr1 o>-c- S-aal??-? /?- fc1 G'/?? /a dog ter, ???? /P?O ??Lr 5fD'?. Ll?n G/JY-? '-r?x I CQ,,??7ToY1 . ? i ?? ? LG ?/Lr?GY w? 6 ? ? ? ?0 51 ? ?1 w?sr`?- ? ?/: I i I i r - ( CRPT30 JEFFERSON COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS TIME 12.02.00 PAGE 1 DATE -10/02/85 COUNTY ROAD ADMINISTRATION BOARD SUPPORTING EXPENDITURE REPORT r # BUDGET YEAR 1984 - ! AMOUNT ! _..__519 REIM]XXVSABLE k' - ! 519.000. K - 519.070 REIMBURSABLE PROJECTS ._23.926.35 r 519.071 1.291.58 s- - a " ! 519.073 519.075 10.851.60 19r 178.57 _--.--519.000 TOTAL .. 55. 250.104rr. ! 519 TOTAL REIMBURSABLE 55.250.10 rww ! - ! 541 ROAD CONSTRUCTION !. •' -____541.100 ... -. ?.._ .. _.._ , 541.111 PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING 20.703.66 = - - 541.112 LOCATION ENGINEERING 541.113 PROFILE b CROSS SECTION '2r 130.02 2.655.37 _ 541.114 TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEYS 541.115 DESIGN 660.91 20.986.03 - - ! 541.116 DRAFTING 4.626.85 ! TOTAL 51.742.84 w - 541.121 CONSTRUCTION-.STAKING - X3+11.322 INSPECTION - •691.T4 ^4341.124 REVIEWING SHOP DRAWINGS C 225.79 ! , 541.125 MONUMENTATION 540.36 ., _TOTAL____ 341.100 TOTAL 22 8822Op.23 34.563.070ww ._ _- _ :. ` S41.200 "541.211 RIGHT-OF WAY TITLE SEARCH 628.31 .. ._.- 541.212 RIGHT 10F WAY DESCRIPTIONS - 541.213 RIGHT OF LAY STAKING 92 -' T41.92 ! 223 R M 6 7 - i .._541. 104T OF WAY APPRAISALS. ` 44000.0 0 - 541.722 APPRAISAL REVIEW - 883.26 TOTAL 6.883.26 • - .' 341.231 RIGHT O WAY NEGOTIATION 102.92 T 2332 __ _-541. RIGHT_.OF WAY PAYMENTS - - - '-- - -- - - 5W O D 7 - ._--- - ' T _ AL 1 - - w : ? 2 1 s .200 TOTAL - E ! 34 :._ 7,328.850" _ C _541.300 ROADWAY - UNDISTRIBUTED - - _ - __-- - 541.300 ROADWAY - UMDISTRIBUTE) 341.311 MOBILIZATION 541. 3119 TRAFFIC CONTROL - MOBILIZATION 244 .00 925.25 12.37 C - T ?"--?--341.32 0-EARINU ATm - MW93IN0 . _.. _. ?_ _ . _._l. 1`f 341.331-PL4W=M BALLAST 2 .94 _ 4 Q69+66 OA BD{iA -GRA573--____.._ Y 1.33 -?_ 6 ? - - __ 4 R L `3.11.336 TWTER 884.0 1 , . + 1 T3O?TA?L????g Rg '- ``-, 441'312`: t321S1Yt •BEAU.TANF.?___.._.... ; 43:9ILIN0 -SPECIAL 541. ?1p6 110077.900 w --: X5.281:-42 _ T^ .•. V*2, 82 - _-. - l . ,. . SURFACING 69 341. TRAFFIC CONTROL 3 T- o n. ? . 3 l i Tur n. 1 .1 T 341700 7OTA L ROADWAY - UNDISTRIBUTED .: 76 ZOww 338 9 - 741 4 LIND DITCFEB, ? w .. ..? .K_ ?.. -._ INSTALLING CONCRETE CULVERT CDR ?. 24" -1..?.? ?._ _541a421 --- _ •--' _ ..._ - _ . _ 7 • . . _ . _-- : . ? • C7tP' A - - T 30 DATE -10/02183 JEFFERSON COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS CO ADMINISTRATION BOARD TIME_12.02.00- PAGE 2 -.- - _ 1- =MIN OO'££ImZTUREREPORT . _ YEAR 1 4 1 AMOUNT -- 341.494 WELL TYPE T .. ..603.06 j ? 341.400 TOTAL _. .... - . 1176236.77990" -, _ __._ _ .. ._. . 541.900 341.912 CONISTRUICTION ADMINISTRATION - 269_. '...... 6 3 ._. - _ - 541.900 TOTAL 63 269: M 269.630w , g 541 TOTAL ROAD CONSTRUCTION 150,227.26 rrw .. 342 ROAD MAINT. ACCESS - - 542.100 _? 542.111 PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING 542.114 TOPDORAPHIC SURVEYS 20792.60 1 0 98 - ?I 1 542.113 DESIGN 512.116 DRAFTING , . 11981.30 , 827 14 .. .. 542.M9ATRAFFIC CONTROL - SURVEYING . 32.64. r ?. 1 STAKING 4,054.02 4 958.86 - - _. 342.122 INSPECTION TOTAL 464.25 q - 542.300 TOTAL. 1,423.11 w _ _. 6:277 930** ..- _- . 342.200 542 211 RIG - .. . HT OF WAY TITLE SEARCH 542.212 RIGHT OF WAY DESCRIPTIONS 82,04 542.213 RIGHT OF WAY STAKING 15.98 111.32 542.200 TOTAL 209.34 w j - •+ 209.340Aw_ i 542.300 ROADWAY - UNDISTRIBUTED 542.300 ROADWWY - UNDISTRIBUTED 31,573.17 542.311 MOBILIZATION 25,290.07 342.312 REMOVE STRUCTURE S OBSTRUCTION Ir812.2 9 r? Y TOTAL 542.321 CLEARING AND GRUBBING 542.322 ROADWAY EXCAVATION 58,610.93 A 1x460.65 - c $ 342.323 ITABLE FOUNDATION REMOVAL 81 3884.94 - . 1 DEWA 542.326 EYATL72IN0 - 542.3?33T PLACING PIT RUN GRAVEL 21463.86'4 34,683.63 542.332 PLALZNO SCREENED GRAVEL 542 333 PLACIN 57,679.83 I . G CRUSHED SURFACING 542 334 GRADING R 1,831.24 _ ' OADWAY 542.333 DUST COATS 69x349.31 1:881.06 - 542.336 WATER 2x086.14 - N 542.33 TOTAL 9 TRAFFIC CONTROL - BASE 342 342 OILING 235.73 167x748.96 w 1 . - SEAL COAT 542 343 O 48,160.27 . ZlINO - SPECIAL 542 42,829.74 PO 542.346 PR£LEVE T ING 25,002.64 _ 542.347 COLD MIX PATCHING 4,341.70 25:111.37 542.348 HOT MIX PATCHING 205.12 • 342.349 TRAFFIC CONTROL -SURFACING TOTAL 3,123.00 542.361 GRADE 6 SHAPE SHGULDERS 148,773.84 a 14.478.31 1 542.362 REBUILD SHOULDERS 542.363 SiRXA_DERS YIDEN7ING 611 55 . 11362.09 x 542.364 ROAR APPROACH/DRIVEWAY REPAIRS 542.363 MACHINE SWEEPING - SHOULDERS 711.43 542.369 TRAFFIC CONTROL SHOLGERRS 1,333.97 67.15 - r TOTAL 542.300 TOTAL ROADWAY - UNDISTRIBUTED 18,586.50 396,252.690«. _ 1 ' c -: CRCRPPTT30010/02/83 JEFFERSON COUNTY PUDLIC WORKS COUNTY ROAD ADMSNI.T.TION BOARD SUPPORTI TIME A2.02.00 PAGE 3 t _ s &1DGET YEAR URE REPORT 1994 t, - < AMOUNT 542.400 - 6+12 412 PULLSNG+""DITCHES ,..=„-. 342 432 MINOR DITCH MAINTENANCE 40,226.7&, a X542 41Ss1Y1C/1IHE. SWEEPING - D2TCHE5 - - . .. t542 4 1 -TFLNFFIC ClXF2RDL ;DITCHINB _32 962.10 .. 3 168.23.$. 23 T D : 3.630 z? 542.421 CONCRETE CULVERTS - 12" DIA 81.987.90 • 4 189 59 _ 5J 542.422 CONCRETE CULVERTS - 1S" DIA 542.424 CULVERT MAINTENANCE - CONCRETE . . 3 . 183.47 ' 542 .425 METAL CIAVFRTS - 12" DIA. 4 . 540 . 76 ( 542.426 METAL CULVERTS 28" DIA. - 1.813.47 542.427 METAL CULVERTS - >18" DIA. .542.428 CULVERT MAINTENANCE - METAL 4.584.83 5.618.44 r. . f? 542.429 TRAFFIC CONTROL - CULVERTS .5,365.98 - -i TOTAL 542.431 CAT BASIN TYPE 1 872.24 30.468.78 • - & 542.432 CATCH DRBIN TYPE 2 243.32 27 L - f 542.434 DRY WELL TYPE TOTAL .04 1,1125 .4 .. 542.M7 CONCRETE CURS 1.39a. S1 « 4 - --542.443 ASPHALT CURB 8 .13 - 542.449 TRAFFIC CONTROL - CURBS 101.81 - l TOTAL 34.19 542.400 TOTAL 224:1 342.500 114. 20.w 1 542.512 DPID1E CLEANING 542. 513 STRUCTURAL REPAIRS 1.501.15 - - ' . TO TAL 3'12.333 RIP RAP -SEA WALLS 527.79 2.028.94 r L .. - .. ? 342.E BAR REMOVAL ,...._. M 542.300 TOTAL 2.354.32 3.331.53 w ?. 542.600 5.367.470+.! _ . S42.T13TAL _- 431.20 s 342. T STREET LIGHTS TO .431.20 * T O 1 078 98 * 542.641 STREET SIGNS 54 6 .5 43 LANE MNHAR?Mm 42.6 29 9S4 15 . E POSTS /DELINEATORS . 20,906 . 69 3l 542 645 THERMOPLASTIC MARKIItGS .- 342.646 LA1AimRAIL 199.35 C • - 542.647 TRAFQ!FIC ISLANDS - 542.648 SI MANUFAC 122 72 85.85 - TURING 542.7 TRAFFIC CONTROL - TRAFFIC AL 2,916.56 1,764.36 93 414 "I SNOY PLOIiIND -._ 342.662 Hli1W PLOYZND WITH-SANDING .-3 4 2 .663SAlOIINO ROADS , .75 -. . 10 684 45 - p .:. 5y4 ?p 977 7. • 542.E TRA F FIC CONTROL SNOW 6 ICE 1 :93 36 AL ?? ?? {{ -_i2.671-STT)tMNFCt I? 514 30 - - 1- i; .EANIR 342 673 FLUSiTINO ROADWAY 342.•6 79 . TRAFFIC. CONTROL STREET. CLEANING 94 1 092 47 - T? m --S42:d00 TOTAL : : 340 71 E _ s4z To o C ?W ?g }??2 7y ?54Z,712f e342.713J7AMi111t_*8R116H `' - - 542.T14tTT?E=TRIMMIHO?7'r 542.716: HERBICIDE SPRAYING _ .-: ? •. ?.: ? .r ?, ? w v: ? 1; w v: W y ? y J s o N S N f A U$ ?rr? oa cv o??n?'?H ?nm.+ ?.f,a Ippp .°.V Ffv?'?vrfnor?gPo8?S&.??&?0"8?1?'FOVCi8?.. JJ ppyygrp??pappap?.,Yppp(ppryy ?pp?ppppp MU .?.ppppppp [mY m ym? (y pfP?yp?(nV o qfo ym? p fA¢ .n11MVPP mm PP ?M.i00 tl! T Goo PPP. NP.Pa.Pi MMOOPP017NU191Y1? - Y1?NfN.~ifNV p t7p pf?I... gyp. ?N?± f? M eri Mlfrl? I? '?•? f0Yl - $OYl YlY1{VfVPPM.y?O 19ONa:NN fin zH r .y .? ( !V xj xPr, FAM i I KM M 1 coo 21 [Y? M ? ??t(j Mp77 o p a Jp JJ ?.,JJ ? 7 6?R ?¢C?CW J7S L?? JJ ppSQ ppppS yy??pSp QC Q2 p?Q y pSp Mg a?pNppp payp?p? Q ? y 6QF _ no .?w.? ?00 0 w N w fff ffff?Y7Yi?00?000 FFFFI?!-rFrF r?? NO yf??FF PFP FPPPPPF PPPPppP PP q?y??N?y ?PyyPpp?PyP??pF NNN N N NNN NN Z PPPfFFF- I+IIIFF--- ??a x axx as gin 8 ?mm " x x Magi xxx r,-, r- I I I ? I I ? ? I o I LLLLLLLL ?(yypp..p?/Iyyi?? II ((yy yy?III??I.ipp?p y? ?p?Ii? py? p? ?ppl; `. == MI?fP?V W?00lVY1 f'0 MP f?OMfNFH?0I0?yYr?lfrp?YlOIy?Ofp??f?a??y MpM!O?I? IyO?.pNi?F.?plnMyHpP Y1F417HfMfF??M H~?? gt $ p?j ?jffiN 00?17M1q??NY1?0Fq ?h?mY7 ; M10 rNYl?. .ON ? ?7P .Pplf?.ifOl`w ¢ 8 ??FMNN.ni??M1M?Oq OlO.fi???lfpiffH' H HHerPM N17f 0.~+a??i'?p.PimSPY? ? 0 PM CN -Cipm FP?lfl?H n H ' IN ?g { 1 p yp HN I¢ U, {Y?yI N W WM GO ¢6HW~ }Iy(J-{f ? U j? ?f? g?}j ? MTss? Mm IQQI? W i f???IS(Q?q ? . I 071 W GQ I I .NitiO ? ? y 1 ?'.IY? ?i QL HpZ ? 1" I " Q I dR p Y p Z N " u ? ym?H?! 1w-a?JI I I I IC ? I li? YI Z? "fill !if Lw V, a9 ZH ?Q?M {(r[?IJJ U r [t??j Ju ?Ia£y?I "?°44U.4 ggL ' H M HIS "?~ JQC6?" Q ~ ly p Z H ~?" N PMHrHN O PI-r HN(DP fv f f? r rHN rr pq" p p, n ?p HH?:FpNaNyry??"??a ?x? ?? YIF Offlivil.taffill, ..q m M??'"M1FM117 r+M1MM/ F ff TfFffff f!fff f t I mo, T Rn 'i' ,.. .,i 3 m r m qrc earwaTrm«--^----- -- 1 r' 4 I * ?'. IKJ I . ?? ?jj((yy fNmPOOMMO.00 MJ N V1Y7?r.+hfYlY700 gga ri rnroro o r ? ' ' i ' ? ?' gg qg .pp ?? rrr qg; F 3odi?n?:°rvn?nidNOr o :7 ? n W N. m p p p NiI? lVY7[;m NNa.I.? f qo. iVnIVN O ?t ??? ? ? ?????`r?rFrFrftl-?1- P4?F .•Sp ! g g ? - ` f I I f I . I ; ? I 7 PULLING DITCHES 542.411 (Acess) PuLLLng dLtches - 39;689.34 I 542.418 Machine sweeping I 8,424.79 ' 542.419 TraffLc Control, l t 3,764.77 il 546.411 (ART) PuLLLng dLtches 20,118.98 546.418 Machine Swee ?n p? g 3,766.68 j 546.419 TraffLc Control 1,796.04 MLLes 100 centerLLne Total, $77,560.60 Cost per centerLLne mi.Le = $775.60 542.711 MachLne mowLng (ACC) 27,426.68 546.711 (ART) 17,000.26 MLLes 1290 SHLDR TotaL $44,426.94 Cost per SHLDR mLLe = $34.43 1 542.712 MachLne brush CuttLng (ACC) 13,549.13 546.712 (ART) 11,273.70 MLLes 81 SHLDR TotaL $24,867.83 Cost per SHLDR MLLe = $307.01 542.714 Tree TrLmmLng (ACC) 9,236.08 542.719 TraffLc Control, 1,645.95 546.714 Tree TrLmmLng (ART) 7,326.53 (1 WK was on B.C.) 546.719 TraffLc ControL 2,163.40 i MLLes 20 SHLDR Total $20,371.96 Cost per SHLDR MLLe = $679.0 6 V1 r k 542.713 ManuaL Brush CuttLng (ACC) 4,363.64 546.713 Manual Brush CuttLng (ART) 7,445.42 MLLes 28 SHLDR TotaL $11,809.06 Cosh per SHLDR MLLe $421.75 1 sl R 77 ?' f{JF?l t' ' C f f rT h ? S+-1 it rr, 1 a.YA?' ?. v - - -- ----------- { ! marutergame apdthentbeytlavCtoenG+>reTie- brsi?es; a{ more ?' wg pushed, shoved; gouged and insulted 4 i can sl$01$rAnt a hty lan waw?Sfan?3feldtbeisNalrctent gettotbechiekert"sheadoftheni:'Ifthtsrsftm I'll T6 iev -t'R` ice, . , e tishistoryl? ake mebinctwlia, and make tt to yo eh 'We others Lave°crammed them 1 to .? Yeah, I was there, but hey I dldn t v rt du Iu 6loj{y of animalsditssince the L7?6 cn nude 7 ;? - C7drEea's s ,tngraph; itwass for nnan bo ,; h ms lea K on pop cultuie none has : oared to he if thecli ?,ndtdautographmyprc r n t,'-it bei",ofGlanaoufas,;lropularty•" - ' . ju.-tLappindsostop pointlnRAfmcttilundmv Pmgti]ftryingtocolpet?withapemi,e[ora _ k. cuddlq nn1fiW costume so that I can trat ?I all I do t u en like the CjOc ,n Uut much. Oh c er th e country getting paid to go to ba ba ' ' sure; he s funny and all that. But it bothers me games,., supermazkeopenmgs; : and movie' ' at a guy can have an income which probably premieres wlW U e,maldiig a tobl of myself. There , ram to.s s figures; and all be does is put on a are thos¢Rho contendT don't need a costume to:' nQ hicken suit and act silly. make a fool f rgys buf then they probabl fi6t6 me even morels that I didn't" don't like YecrW" Herman, so what do they FlI: think 4 it fiO - Lnn P .,t . - t na ft t7 h '! ' ?C n} on _ s has beendeveloping ayr, , With;, Northwest motif so that I could, ' t to;rngional_interests. Eventually Peould .'. out ,especially, f I wear the cedar tree' peed up a couple of years ago. The trou- . t Lereated an old growth model and tit out the'dooi. ter problem was caused by my ferryboat - •:•Altho It makes a.defuutlve state . ut the et Sound lifestyle, when I I have a myste 'ous proclivity for rune things Inadditian,thefetrysldthashad ve impact on my finances use of the - - - able'cost overruns that developed du- o nshvetion. -orite creation is the slug suit, but I'm af;:getting.stepped on while' slithering. - 'aisles at the Kingdom': And I hate to - wbatmghtlisppen if someone spilled sco on me:' rn np occurred to me that I could make a , ft the Summer months by. appearing at '. games d sgu sed as a baseball player. nd thought, that would be stretching _ far. '-- - rving the reader e Daily News ls• published for its. - - ors; we like to hear from you. If. you - _ -a question or a comment about the -r paper, here are the names of those , - nsibleforthevarious departments. Duccescht ' -_ Keith Mathis -- dPU IO..r ploaUCtlon Manager , j BlrumhageelA -, AI Mille, S a Ineaa Man p r .too -? ` 7 G c arty ` Tony Wishlk { . PULLING DITCHES F 542.411 (Acess) PuLLing ditches - 39,689.34 542.418 MachLne sweeping 8,424.79 - 542.419 TraffLc Control 3,764.77 r 546.411 (ART) PuLLLng dLtches 20,118.98 546.418 MachLne SweepLng 3,766.68 546.419 TraffLc ControL 1,796.04 MLLes 100 centerLLne TotaL $77,560.60 Cost per centerLLne mLLe = $775,60 Cost per shoulder -mile _'$387.,80. 542.711 MachLne mowLng (ACC) 27,426.68 546.711 (ART) 17,000.26 MLLes 1290 SHLDR 3 . Total $44,426.94 W` ' Cost per SHLDR mLLe = $34.43 542.712 MachLne brush cuttLng (ACC) 13,549.13 r 546.712 (ART) 11,273.70 ( MLLes 81 SHLDR c TotaL $24,867.83 Cost per SHLDR MLLe = $307,0 1 1 1 I 4 Y 542.714 Tree TrLmmLn g (ACC) 9,236.08 I:.n 542.719 TraffLc ControL 1,645.95 - i 546.714 Tree TrLmmLng (ART) 7,326,53 ("I WK 546.719 TraffLc Control was on B.C.). 2,163,40 MLLes 20 SHLDR T otal $20,371,96 Cost per SHLDR MLLe $679.06 i ' 542.713 ManuaL Brush CuttLng (ACC) 4,363.64 546.713 ManuaL Brush CuttLng (ART) 7,445.42 Jp't MLLes 28 SHLDR TotaL $11 809 06 an+? Cost per SHLDR MLLe $421.75 , . i a , ? 74 ,y MGN.??1? _.1#1???5Fd??1?{.?ri?.?4.?SwfiltSiFtwmtrs _ ?YP?S1l?JI[t?e??amgavnrwr?w .w+..?..?.r.... II , - Special Report Roadside Vegetation Management 186 Produced in association with the National Roadside Vegetation Management Association f Roadside Vegetation Management '86 I-1 The new professionalism in roadside management Local conditions, use of herbicides and plant growth regulators, mowing techniques, and area traditions all play role in vegetation management In this special report, ROADS & BRIDGES will discuss: e Herbicides, their variety, func- tions and methods of operation. • Mowing, its methods and place in roadside vegetation management. • How the states and counties are incorporating chemical and mechan- ical control in their programs. • Safety and training in chemical and mechanical vegetation control. • Public relations, and the prob- lems public agencies and contract sprayers encounter in chemical veg- etation management, and how to overcome those problems. • Native species and wildflowers, and the ways states are using natural means to manage roadsides. • And, a review of products, for more information about materials and equipment discussed. by Tom Kuennen According to the Federal Highway Administration, there are approx- imately 3.9 million miles of public roadways in the United States. Roadway widths vary greatly, as do pavement types. But there's at least one thing they've all got in common: their roadsides. When one thinks of roadsides, two themes immediately come to mind: ero- sion and vegetation. Erosion control has benefited from a steady advance in technological im- provements, such as application of geo- 8 textiles, specialized netting and mat- ting, and dedicated drainage ditching d equipment. In the meantime, though, roadside vegetation management techniques have literally exploded in variety of methods, productivity and research ef- forts. A proliferation of products and application research is changing the very character of roadside vegetation management. Indeed, in 1984, state and county roadside managers joined with product vendors to create the National Roadside Vegetation Management Association, the very aim of which is to provide "a means for the exchange of ideas, expe- riences, opinions and information rela- tive to roadside vegetation manage- ment," according to immediate past president J. A. "Andy" Lewis, roadside maintenance engineer, Florida Depart- ment of Transportation. For those very reasons, ROADS & BRIDGES Magazine decided last year to take a close look at new directions in roadside vegetation management. This Herbicide is applied in controlled amounts. 26 ROADS & BRIDGESIFEBRUARY. 1986 ? special report-Roadside Vegetation F Management '86-produced in close cooperation with the National Roadside Vegetation Management Association, gives our 55,000 readers a fresh look at a rapidly changing area of importance 41, to highway and road maintenance. Why oontroi vegetation? The need to control vegetation is patently obvious to professionals in our industry, but may not be so to citizens or even highway users. Roadside vege- tation management improves, at the very least, safety, and in promoting j 4 drainage, prolongs pavement and sub- grade life. According to DuPont, control of vegetation: • improves roadside appearance • protects signs, markers, guardrails • reduces maintenance costs • improves visibility on curves • and provides safer shoulders for motorist emergencies. "Roads with wide, grassy rights-of- ! way have much better safety records i than those with brush and trees growing right to the edge," says Dow Chemical g USA, another supplier of herbicides E `. and plant growth regulators. "Proper control of brush on highway One „ny to cause a crash ROWS ... increases visibility of other traffic, especially around curves and at intersections; of people and animals 6 crossing the road; increases visibility of warning and advisory signs; and pro- mOtcs good road surface drainage Dow also says good highway vegetation control eliminates noxious weeds be. fore they become detrimental to public health or agriculture. Professional management 'Me evolution of roadside manage. ment from a periodic mowing chore to coordination of differing tasks under a dedicated professional has not come quickly. Indeed, the idea is not earn. Pletely accepted in all states. But the professional roadside manager on the state or county staff can be a valuable individual. "Roadsides require real man,,igcmcnt by trained professionals," said John Burkhardt, landscapesupervisor for the Indiana Department of Highways, ROADS BRIDGES/FEBRUARY, 1986 27 vaara rail IS obscured by plants. "The results don't have to look the { same nationwide, but goals must be set fi based on economics, aesthetics, safety, and even politics. "The manager must then be allowed to use the tools at his disposal to achieve those goals. No state can allow any (method of roadside vegetation mainte- nance) to become an end in itself. Each manager must look at mechanical, chemical and natural 'tools' and fit each into its most productive position in his overall management plan," Burkhardt said. Michigan's experience A look at the history of Michigan roadside vegetation management, as related by Ross M. Wolfe, supervisor, Environmental Unit, Michigan Depart- ment of Transportation, illustrates this evolution of roadside management. "It was in the middle 1930s before the Department of Transportation-the i old highway department-was in- volved to any extent in the management of highway roadsides," Wolfe said. "It was about that time that mowers be- came available for use on highway roadsides." Prior to the mid-1930s, in most instances, highway roadsides were taken care of by adjacent land owners or farmers. Mowing was done either with A horse-drawn equipment, or perhaps with some of the very earliest tractors and pull-behind cycle bar mowers. Speeds then were relatively low; 28 ROADS 8 BRIDGES/FEBRUARY, 1986 brush control along the roadsides was very limited. Just before World War 11, there were some organized efforts tc begin managing roadside vegetation. Equipment used was strictly developed for farm use and adapted for roadside operation. After the war, Wolfe relates, the factories that geared up for wartime production were able to change over quite quickly to production of farm machinery and other equipment need- ing replacement. "Highway speeds were up, and there were more people traveling on the high- ways," Wolfe said. "Manpower was available, and there was more emphasis on the roadside program." It was also during and after the war that some of the herbicides as we know them today were developed and used. By the late 1950s, Wolfe said, four- lane divided highways were well under construction throughout the country. "By about 1960, freeway rest areas were under construction throughout Michigan," he said. As the divided and limited access highways started replac- ing the old two-lane routes, there was a substantial increase in mowable acres for each mile of highway. "Highway departments were mowing full-width, and, of course, the increased acreage resulted in much higher mowing costs," "In Michigan," Wolfe said, "our initial reduction in mowing was made in 1961, when we started what we called 'contour mowing,' which substantially reduced the total mowing acreage by eliminating some of the hard-to-mow areas such as steep slopes." "About that same time, special inter- est groups noticed the increased acre- age tied up in right-of-way. Their input had a significant bearing on the future of management of highway ROW. • Wildlife managers, for example, requested no mowing be done on ROW until late in the season, so pheasants and ducks could successfully complete their nesting before mowing. • Some farmers and ranchers wanted to manage highway ROWs for hay crops so they could supply part of their needs from adjacent highways. • Some were interested in establish- ing timber plantings so the wide ROWS could supply part of the growing demand for newsprint and paper. e Beekeepers wanted the highway departments to establish plantings on the ROW so their bee colonies could forage after the fruit crops had been pollinated. And, Wolfe observes, it was not long until almost every state had heard from the wildflower enthusiasts, who want to see the wide highway ROWS man- aged for wildflowers or the re-establish- ment of prairies. "While all these interest groups may be accommodated one way or the other, the main concern of the ROW manager is to provide safe and forgiving road- sides for the highway traveler," Wolfe said. ? I Special Report Roadside Vegetation Management '86 Produced in association with the National Roadside Vegetation Management Association i y a C y d 6 IC 111 m l7 ? J F f weal conoiaons, use of herbicides and plant growth regulators, mowing techniques, and area traditions all play role in vegetation management by Tom Kuennen According to the Federal Highway Administration, there are approx- imately 3.9 million miles of public roadways in the United States. - Roadway widths vary greatly, as do pavement types. But there's at least one - thing they've all got in common: their roadsides. When one thinks of roadsides, two themes immediately come to mind: ero- sion and vegetation. Erosion control has benefited from a steady advance in technological un _ :f provements, such as application of geo- 3 textiles, specialized netting and mat- ing, and dedicated drainage ditching - 8 equipment. - In the meantime, though, roadside - vegetation management techniques have literally exploded in variety of methods, productivity and research ef- forts. A proliferation of products and application research is changing the very character of roadside vegetation 4 I management. I Indeed, in 1984, state and county roadside managers joined with product vendors to create the National Roadside Vegetation Management Association , the very aim of which is to provide "a means for the exchange of ideas, expe- riences, opinions and information rela- tive to roadside vegetation manage- " ment, according to immediate past president]. A. "Andy" Lewis, roadside maintenance engineer, Florida Depart' ment of Tfansportation. For those very reasons, ROADS & BRIDGES Magazine decided last year Herbicide is applied in controlled amounts. to take a close look at new directions in 26 ROADS & BRIDGESIFEBRUARY, 1986 roadside vegetation management. This 1 ? i y . t?} r ?1 n 4 I Irl j ? I k I special report-Roadside Vegetarian Management '86-produced in close ?, ?V 3II } yyykkk cooperation with the National Roadside & Vegetation Management Association, .1, gives our 55,000 readers a fresh look at a rapidly changing area of importance to highway and road maintenance. - wtF ? ? Why control vegetation? - The need to control vegetation is patently obvious to professionals in our industry, but may not be so to citizens or even highway users. Roadside vege- tation management improves, at the very least, safety, and in promoting f drainage, prolongs pavement and sub- r t ` j grade life. According to DuPont, control of ar; t vegetation: e i d id 4 ' T•r r4, mproves roa s e appearance il k d , t, - s l -, ra s • protects signs, mar ers, guar • reduces maintenance costs I` • improves visibility on curves ' • and provides safer shoulders for a y ? motorist emergencies. "Roads with wide, grassy rights-of- ?'"?• way have much better safety records - than those with brush and trees growing " c C' says Dow Chemical right to the edge, f R t ` j USA, another supplier of herbicides ':< 13... f and plant growth regulators. One uny to cause a crash ' "Proper control of brush on highway ROWS ... increases visibility of other traffic, especially around curves and at intersections; of people and animals crossing the road; increases visibility of warning and advisory signs; and pro- motes good road surface drainage." Dow also says good highway vegetation J control eliminates noxious weeds be- fore they become detrimental to public health or agriculture. Professional management The evolution of roadside manage- ment from a periodic mowing chore to coordination of differing tasks under a dedicated professional has not come quickly. Indeed, the idea is not com- pletely accepted in all states. But the professional roadside manager on the state or county staff can be a valuable individual. "Roadsides require real management by trained professionals," said John Burkhardt, landscape supervisor for the } Indiana Department of Highways. ((( (continued) Encroaching vegeiation creates hazard. ROADS & BRIDGES/FEBRUARY, 1986 27 J I I Guard rail is obscured by plants. "The results don't have to look the brush control along the roadsides was reduced the total mowing same nationwide, but goals must be set very limited. Just before World War 11, eliminating some of the h based on economics, aesthetics, safety, there were some organized efforts to areas such as steep slopes.' and even politics. begin managing roadside vegetation. "About that same time, s "The manager must then be allowed Equipment used was strictly developed est groups noticed the inci to use the tools at his disposal to achieve for farm use and adapted for roadside age tied up in right-of-way. those goals. No state can allow any operation. had a significant bearing o (method of roadside vegetation mainte- After the war, Wolfe relates, the of management of highwa) ?ance) to become an end in itself. Each factories that geared up for wartime a Wildlife managers, f manager must look at mechanical, production were able to change over requested no mowing be do chemical and natural 'tools' and lit each quite quickly to production of farm until late in the season, S, 4 into its most productive position in his machinery and other equipment need- and ducks could successful overall management plan," Burkhardt ing replacement. their nesting before mowin said. "Highway speeds were up, and there 0 Some farmers and Michigan's experience were more people traveling on the high. wanted to manage highwa) ways," Wolfe said. "Manpower was hay crops so they could sul A look at the history of Michigan available, and there was more emphasis their needs from adjacent h roadside vegetation management, as on the roadside program." 0 Some were interested i related by Ross M. Wolfe, supervisor, It was also during and after (lie war ing timber plantings sc Environmental Unit, Michigan Depart- that some of the herbicides as we know ROWs could supply part of I ment of Transportation, illustrates this them today were developed and used. demand for newsprint and I evolution of roadside management. By the late 1950s, Wolfe said, four- 0 Beekeepers wanted fl "It was in the middle 1930s before lane divided highways were well under departments to establish p the Department of Transportation-the construction throughout the country. the ROW so their bee colt old highway department-was in- "By about 1960, freeway rest areas forage after the fruit crop volved to any extent in the management were under construction throughout pollinated. of highway roadsides," Wolfe said. "it Michigan," he said. As the divided and And, Wolfe observes, it v was about that time that mowers be- limited access highways started replac- until almost every state had came available for use on highway ing the old two-lane routes, there was a the wildflower enthusiasts I roadsides." substantial increase in mowable acres to see the wide highway R Prior to the mid-1930s, in most for each mile of highway. "Highway aged for wildflowers or the ri instances, highway roadsides were departments were mowing full-width, ment of prairies. taken care of by adjacent landownprsor and, of course, the increased acreage "While all these interest I farmers. Mowing was done either with resulted in much higher mowing costs." be accommodated one way ( horse-drawn equipment, or perhaps "in Michigan," Wolfe said, "our the main concern of the RO' with some of the very carlicst tractors initial reduction in mowing was made is to provide safe and forg and pull-behind cycle bar mowers. in 1961, when we started what we called sides for the highway trave Speeds then were relatively low; 'contour mowing,' which substantially said. F1 28 ROADS & BRIDGESiFEBRUARY, 1986 I paper in a friendly little town" i, ...B12 Senior Clinic B17 Creative Circle. .1318 Sequim Sports B2 Dining & Entertainment. • . B 9 Strait Shots .............. B5 dtctti- Commission denies Hell Hill rezone " s for about. 460 homes to even- runoff. She claimed that she never clear to Sequim Bay," Bell said. ly be constructed. had flooding problems until the pond Project engineer Gary East testified he report also said the sewage and storage system were installed in earlier, saying the storm water rat- em would be hooked up to the the development. She also mentioned netion basin held back 1.7 million of Sequim's sewer system, but it pollution of Bell Creek to gallons of storm water that would not yet extend into the subject Washington Harbor. have flooded Sequim streets. "The impacts from this develop. "The storm water runoff plan ('he development currently has just ment extend miles, affecting creeks, worked like it should," East said. He k fire hydrant in place, serving roads and downstream properties Please turn to Page 7 y bes for more hydrants to be in- it a half dozen homes. There are led as the number of homes in- e. The roads are also too narrow fire protection vehicles. Me soil has been identified as Ivelly loam, with 15 to 35 percent pes and shallow hard pan, which ittmizes water absorption. This has ised much of the concern on 4agecapability. the development has a 100,000 yic foot retention basin to hold rm runoff. The city of Sequim has ced its concern on the adequacy of system, the size of ponds, ditch tem and culverts, and retention of etation in the area for containing J disposing of storm water runoff. the development company has -eed to upgrade all of the problem as. Opposition the rezone proposal was opposed the public hearing by three people. 'presenting Protect the Peninsula's lure, Eloise Kailin said "denser t,elopment would be harmful to the blic interests" due to storm water off problems which were iden- ed at an early stage of the }zlopment. pp'he quoted an early agreement twcen the City of Sequim and the per that permitted sewer hook if the developer provided a storm ter drainage system meeting the v engineer's approval. ^_,ince then, the development has lcived approval by the city and Unty engineers. But the city ;inver required Highland Hills to plement corrective measures this ,nmer from damages caused by this ?ter's rains. Kailin questioned whether the city d county are responsible for mages, since both entities have ac. pled the drainage system as equate. She also mentioned potential gative impacts on Sequim Bay and ashington Harbor, which receive noff from Johnson Creek and Bell eek - the two main drainages for III Hill. The organization opposed c rezone request until a new en- ronmental Impact statement could rther address these and other per- lent concerns. Mary Bell also testified against the zone. She owns a dairy farm north j Bell Hill, down the slope from dler Road, the county access road the development. She said her farm is damaged by Bell Hill runoff after e past storm. She also reported that e Highland Hills Irrigation Ditch as shut off to contain the runoff. it: said muddy.water flowed through e ditches for weeks, and neigh- Sring driveways were flooded by the County to limit weed spraying to road edges By Carol Uchten Property owners no longer need bother with registering to prevent herbicide spraying of the county rights-of-way along their property. The county Public Works Department will not spray beyond 18 inches from the edge of the road for the next two to three years. "We are going to see if we can control it without the use of herbi- cides," said Randy Wright, Public Works road maintenance supervisor. During the trial period, Public Works will record its various methods and costs of vegetation management to find out how cost-effective these other measures really are. There has been some debate over the effect of herbicides on one's quality of life and the cost effectiveness of various methods of control- ling weeds. Public Works personnel maintain herbicides are the most cost-effective for the county to keep roadside vegetation from creeping onto the road and breaking it up. County-Commissioner for the East End Evan Jones questions the use of herbicides, especially on the property of those people who, for "qual- ity of life" reasons, reject herbicide use. "My personal view is we don't have to spray (at all) on personal prop- erty. As a commissioner, I'm comfortable with having eliminated two- thirds of the program," he said. The two-thirds refers to not spraying the fronts and backs of the ditch. He said if people want to protest any use of herbicides, he knows two ways that the public could inform Public Works. One way would be to continue to register for no spraying at the department as a show of pro- test. The other way would be through the initiative process. Through the Clallam County Charter, the public can institute legisla- tion by filing a petition with signatures of at least 10 percent of the coun- ty's voters who took part in the last gubernatorial election, and submit that to the Board of Commissioners. The Board is then required to hold a public hearing on it and adopt or reject the initiative with a roll call vote. It can also go to election if the board does not act within 60 days. Jefferson County has had a no-spray policy in effect for the past two years, in which the edge of the pavement is not sprayed at all. Jefferson County Commissioner John Pitts said plant material hits sprouted beneath the pavement edge and combined with moisture to start to crumble the edge. He added that Public Works will be evaluating the possibility of reinstituting herbicide use. Clallam County Public Works Director Gene Unger reported that it would cost the county 5200,1100 more per year to not spray the edge of the pavement because of mechanical and labor costs for other means of weed control. Jones said that even if it costs that much, "We have between five and eight million dollars in the road fund. 1 think we can afford the extra to eliminate that much poisoning." The county road crew did not spray for weeds last fall because Public Works was assigned to formulate a policy on vegetation management before spraying again. The Board returned the department's paper work once last fall and again during the winter, saying that both attempts did not constitute a management policy. The department has since come to a verbal intermittent policy with the board so spray crews could begin work the second week of March. The crew will continue working through the month until about early April. Wright said It takes about 15 working days to take care of the weeds east of Port Angeles to the Jefferson county line. The interim policy also states that the crew will not spray over the dit- ches; will not spray with the wind blowing over five miles per hour; will spray on schedule or won't spray at all; will publish written notification of its spraying schedule; will evaluate whether it is reasonable to use pris- oners, juvenile delinquents cr hire temporary help; and will not spray gravel roads at all (since the road department blades them). The county is also considering planting seed or applying hydroseed as a ground cover along the road to keep alder trees from sprouting. 3 . I f { E ex- 7 i i , i l? i 7,