The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutBLD2000-00589 ♦ BUILDING PERMIT Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street Port Townsend, WA 98368 (360)379-4450 FAX (360)379-4451 (800) 831-2678 PERMIT #: BLD00-00589 Received Date 09/12/2000 SITE ADDRESS: 5945 FLAGLER RD Issue Date 09/21/2000 NORDLAND, 98358 Expiration Date 09/21/2001 APPLICANT: JOHN BURKE PHONE: (360)379-2966 STEPHANIE BURKE PO BOX 191 NORDLAND WA 98358 SUBDIVISION: Block: Lot: T 6 PARCEL NUMBER: 921043013 Section: 4 Township: 29 N Range: 01 E CONTRACTOR: BROCKMAN BUILDERS PHONE: (360)638-1125 33145 EGLON RD NE KINGSTON WA 98346 Contractor's License: BROCKB*051B6 Expires: 04/15/2001 LOAN LENDER/ BOND HOLDER: PROJECT DESCRIPTION STAIRWAY TO THE BEACH REQUIRED INSPECTIONS: [ ] Footings/Setbacks (Shoreline Setbacks): ( st r o k 7- J 4.1 ,G zc-- e(c.. 7-45-6 [ ] Foundation: [ ] Underground Plumbing/Underground Insulation: [ ] Shear Wall: ry, lumbing: - ' A7 ' /( ///`11,e+�` [ ] Propane Tank/Lines: [ ] Insulation: [ ] Sheetrock: L ( [° — al/ ccupancy Approval: /C l/ /`/ r•srn e9 HEALTH DEPARTMENT APPROVAL REQUIRED PRIOR TO FINAL INSPECTION. THIS PERMIT IS VALID FOR ONE YEAR OR IT MUST BE PROPERLY RENEWED BUILDING INSPECTION HOT-LINE 379-4455. CALL 24 HOURS IN ADVANCE TO SCHEDULE INSPECTIONS. Office Hours 9:00 a.m. -4:30 p.m. Inspector's Phone Hours 8:00 a.m. - 9:00 a.m. "ONDITIONS MAY APPLY - SEE REVERSE HOT LINE AVAILABLE 24 HOURS A DAY 09/26/2000 Conditions Associated with Case #: SDP99-00010 9:49:29 AM Cond. Chan Code Title Stat. ged Hold Status Changed By Updated Tag Updated By 0100 CUSTOM CONDITION Not Met 12/06/1999 All conditions contained in the Hydraulic Project Approval issued by the Department of Fish and Wildlife for this project All shall be met. The proponent shall provide the Department of Community Development with a copy of the HPA issued by the Department of Fish and Wildlife prior to the onset of construction activity. 0100 CUSTOM CONDITION Not Met 12/06/1999 The Mitigative Measures contained in the Final Mitigated Determination of Non-Significance issued by Jefferson County RKK on October 22, 1999 shall be met prior to the onset of construction activities: *Proper disposal of construction debris must be on land in such a manner that debris cannot enter the water body or cause water quality degradation of state waters. *The applicant shall follow Best Management Practices pursuant to the Jefferson COunty Stormwater Management Ordinance. Erosion control Best Management Practices shall be implemented at all times during land disturbing activities. *Removal of native vegetation on the bluff top shall be limited to the minimum necessary for project construction. in order to minimize visual impact,the staircase shall be constructed to harmonize with the local shoreline environment to the maximum extent practicable. 0100 CUSTOM CONDITION Not Met 12/06/1999 RKK In order to enhance shoreline habitat,encourage slope stability,and mitigate for shoreline impact the applicant shall be required to plant three(3)individual trees from the list contained on pages 37 and 38 of the Department of Ecology publication"Vegetation Management:A Guide for Puget Sound Bluff Property Owners." Each of the trees planted must have an erosion control quality rating of either"good"or"excellent,"be of sufficient size at the time of planting to ensure survival, and be planted in a location that will result in increased bluff stability and improved shoreline habitat. Example of tree species meeting these qualifications include Oregon white oak, Grand fir, Douglas-fir, Bigleaf maple, and Pacific madronne. 0100 CUSTOM CONDITION Not Met 12/06/1999 In order to ensure minimum visual impact,the structure shall be constructed of wooden material which will weather and RKK blend with the existing shoreline bank and can be painted, if necessary,to blend with the existing shoreline bank. 0100 CUSTOM CONDITION Not Met 12/06/1999 RKK Construction shall be in substantial compliance with the site plan submitted to Jefferson County on August 3, 1999(Log Item#9)and October 7, 1999(Log Item#28)as they exist now or are hereafter amended by Jefferson County and/or the Department of Ecology. 0100 CUSTOM CONDITION Not Met 12/06/1999 RKK No fill or other material may be placed in the waters or intertidal areas of Jefferson County. 0100 CUSTOM CONDITION Not Met 12/06/1999 RKK Work within the jurisdiction of the Shoreline Program other than as described above shall recieve separate review from this office. 0100 CUSTOM CONDITION Not Met 12/06/1999 RKK Prior to construction,the proponent shall notify the Jefferson County Department of Community Development estimated project timelines for monitoring and plan compliance. 0100 CUSTOM CONDITION Not Met 12/06/1999 RKK Prior to the onset of construction,the applicant shall provide the Department of Community Development with the name and address of the contractor carrying out the project. 0100 CUSTOM CONDITION Not Met 12/06/1999 RKK In order to limit the proliferation of similar stair structures in Scow Bay, the applicant is strongly encouraged to investigate utilizing this structure as a joint use/joint ownership facility with neighboring property owners. Page 1 of 1 BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street Port Townsend, WA 98368 PERMIT #: BLD00-00589 Received Date: 9/12/2000 SITE ADDRESS: 5945 FLAGLER RD NORDLAND, 98358 APPLICANT: JOHN BURKE PHONE: (360)379-2966 STEPHANIE BURKE PO BOX 191 NORDLAND WA 98358 SUBDIVISION: Block: Lot: T 6 PARCEL NUMBER: 921043013 Section: 04 Township: 29 N Range: 01 E CONTRACTOR: BROCKMAN BUILDERS PHONE: (360)638-1125 33145 EGLON RD NE KINGSTON WA 98346 Contractor's License BROCKB*051 B6 Expires 04/15/2001 ARCHITECT/ TILLMAN ENGINEERING INC ENGINEER : PO BOX 1375 PORT HADLOCK WA 98339 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: STAIRWAY TO THE BEACH TYPE OF WORK NON SQUARE FOOTAGE: TYPE OF IMP NEW MAIN: VALUATION 42,000.00 ADD'L: HEAT TYPE: CODE EDITION: 1997 HEAT BASE: HEAT TYPE: OCCUPANCY: UNHEATED: #OF STORIES: OCCUPANCY: OTHER: CONST TYPE: GARAGE: SHORELINE: CONST TYPE: DECK: SETBACK: BANK HEIGHT: SEWAGE DISPOSAL: WATER SYSTEM: PARCEL TAGS: YES NO BEDROOMS: BATHROOMS: STORMWATER: YES NO AREA Exist: Exist: Wetland Erosion Prop: Prop: Seismic Streams Total: Total: Flood Way Flood Plane Routing Date: F&W Landslide 9 CC) Shoreline Aquifer Forest: Commercial Rural Pr xlm.lt - Hat Conditions Type Amount Paid By: Date: Receipt Approveae Permit $562.95 MAM 09/13/00 34269 A P V E Plan Check $168.89 MAM 09/13/00 34269 State Building Code $4.50 MAM 09/13/00 34269 SEP 2 2000 Total: $736.34 Jefferson County Planning &Building Department is\F_BLD_App_Bld.rpt 10/29/99 f , �� onr �� 62181u�1an Jefferson County Department of Community Development % a t,Port Townsend WA 88368[360]318-4450 ro Aip,p1perm o If 0 sxxr � 0 OQ 00n Project Description: Building Type: Project Type: ❑ Single Family LO Frame Type: /New i0 Wood Garage Attached/Detached ❑ Addition ❑ Modular ❑ Steel ❑ Alteration/Remodel ,,Q'' Concrete ❑ Commercial ❑ Repair ❑ Multi-family/#of Units ❑ Masonry Demolition ❑ Other:❑ Industrial Other. «k��t y Bedrooms: Bathrooms: Type of Sewage Disposal: /t-i/A gType of Heat: Choose one: Existing: Existing: ❑ Sewer ❑Communi $ stem ty y ❑ Electricity ❑ Oil Proposed: Proposed: ❑ Individual System ❑ Woodstove ❑ Propane Total: Total: If not sewer,fill out the following: ❑ Heat Pump ❑ Conventional ❑ Alternative ❑ Other Pennit# SEP Water Supply: N/4 ❑ Private well ❑ Two Party Well❑ Public:Name of water system: I Square Footage: For Office Use Only Main Floor UBC OCCUPANCY GROUP 0 �2 Floor f Base fee 3rd Floor Plan Check fee Apr` Htd Basement State Surcharge fee „ Unhtd Basement Subtotal 4 s 3y Garage/Carport Pot Water Review fee - — Decks /5' l/244GX)7' A1 ; ` ', 911/Rd Approach fee Commercial TOTAL �a Industrial Receipt # Other Cash/Check # Total Valuation: Initials Or Date Estimated Cost: 0Z- 000 If within 200 f the Shoreline 5/1 / — C. Distance to Bank ater Mark ft.Bank Height ft. By signing the application form,the applicant/owner attests that the information provided herein is true and correct to the best of their knowledge. Any material falsehood or any omission of a material fact made by the applicant/owner with respect to this application packet may result in this permit being null and void. I further agree to save,indemnify and hold harmless Jefferson County against all liabilities,judgments court costs,reasonable attomey's fees and expenses which may in any way accrue against Jefferson County as a result of or in consequence of the granting of this permit. I further agree to provide access and right of entry to Jefferson County and it's employees,representatives or agents for the purpose of application review and anyrequired later inspections. Access and right of en o rile 'cant's property or structure shall be requested and shall occur during regular business hours. Signatur ` Date: 7---l3--- ®C7 _<dciiii47,0 1 I BEFORE THE HEARING EXAMINER FOR JEFFERSON COUNTY 2 Iry Berteig, Hearing Examiner 3 RE: John and Stephanie Burke ) File No. SDP99-Q010 4 application for a Substantial ) 5 Development Permit, Conditional ) D ly L� 0 U �C Use, to construct a staircase to ) the beach of Island.Scow Bay L on ) FINDINGS, CONCLU,�I NS, #n 29 le 6 Marrowstone 7 ) AND DECISION 1 +�►� 8 ) JEFFERSON COUNTY ) DEPT. OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 9 BACKGROUND INFORMATION 10 Property Location: 5945 Flagler Road on Marrowstone Island. 11 Legal Description: Parcel Number 92104313, Section 4, Township 29 12 North, Range 1 East, WM. 13 SEPA: Jefferson County issued a Final Mitigated Determination of 14 Non-Significance on October 22, 1999. No appeals were filed. 15 PROCEDURAL INFORMATION 16 Notices: Mailed: October 25, 1999 17 Posted: November 2, 1999 18 Publication: October 25, 1999 (Port Townsend- 19 Jefferson County Leader) . 20 Site Visit: November 16, 1999. 21 Open Record Hearing Date: November 16, 1999. 22 The hearing was opened at 1 :55 p.m. in the Courthouse Lower Level 23 Conference Room. A verbatim recording of the public hearing was made. 24 The tape is maintained in the Jefferson Permit Center file. 25 Participants : 26 Randy Kline, Assistant Planner 27 Debbie Randall, Tillman Engineering 28 Stephanie Burke, Applicant 29 Bob McIntosh, Neighbor John &Stephanie Burke Staircase Page 1 SDP99-0010 Shoreline Conditional Use Findings, Conclusions and sions Decision 1 George Barker, Neighbor. 2 No other parties were present to testify. 3 The Hearing Examiner closed the public hearing at 2:25 p.m. 4 EXHIBITS: 5 Exhibit 1: Staff Report dated 11/10/99 together with a copy of the file 6 containing 39 Log Items. 7 Log Item 40: Letter from Randy Kline to Applicant transmitting letters 8 received during the SEPA comment period. 9 FINDINGS OF FACT 10 1. The proposal is for the construction of a staircase leading from 11 the top of an approximately 35-foot bluff down to the beach of Scow 12 Bay on Marrowstone Island. The staircase will be constructed of 13 wooden materials and supported by four concrete pilings to be driven 14 into the substrate above the ordinary high water mark. The stairs 15 will be supported from the bluff top by a "deadman" to be located 16 approximately 40 feet back from the bluff edge. The lowest set of 17 stairs, below the final landing, will be constructed such that they 18 may be drawn up in cantilever fashion above the extreme high tidal 19 elevation when not in use. 20 2 . The subject parcel is . 42 acres in size and is situated on the 21 the west side of Flagler Road. The southern edge of the parcel is 22 characterized by a 35-foot high near vertical bluff, the land above 23 the bluff slopes gently to the bluff edge. 24 3 . Pursuant to the Jefferson County Shoreline Management Master 25 Program the site is designated "Conservancy. " 26 4 . The Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan designates the subject 27 parcel and parcels in the immediate vicinity as "Rural Residential" 28 with a density of one dwelling unit per five acres. 29 John &Stephanie Burke Staircase Page 2 Findings, Conclusions SDP99-0010 Shoreline Conditional Use and Decision 1 5 . Critical Area review has been incorporated into SEPA 2 environmental review. 3 6. The application was determined to be substantially complete on 4 August 13, 1999. 5 7 . A site visit was conducted by Staff on September 1, 1999 with 6 Department of Fish and Wildlife staff. A site visit was conducted by 7 Staff on September 14, 1999 with Department of Ecology staff. 8 8 . The Washington State Department of Ecology submitted a letter 9 dated October 21, 1999 indicating that some properties are best 10 regarded a "view only" as opposed to having direct beach access, that 11 the applicant should be required to construct a joint use facility or 12 provide mitigation, and that the proposed structure will be visually 13 intrusive and, as such, raises significant cumulative impact concerns. 14 9. In reference to the DOE letter dated October 21, 1999, the 15 proposed conditions of the permit include requirements to minimize 16 visual impact as well as the suggestion that the applicant consider 17 using this structure as a joint use facility with neighboring propert 18 owners. For general information, because this project has been 19 reviewed as a shoreline conditional use, the Department of Ecology has 20 the statutory authority to further condition the permit in order to 21 ensure consistency with the Shoreline Management Act. 22 10. Debbie Randall, testifying as the Applicants' representative, 23 concurred with the Staff Report and agreed to the recommended 24 conditions. 25 11. George Barker, an adjoining property owner with land on both 26 sides of the subject property, presented an interesting account of th- 27 changes in ownership going back to 1913. His account explained some 28 of the survey problems, including the effects of those simpler times 29 in our history. Mr. Barker' s story led to a concern with the John &Stephanie Burke Staircase Page 3 Findings, Conclusions SDP99-0010 Shoreline Conditional Use and Decision 1 proximity of the proposed staircase to a beach house on his property. 2 His underlying concern is security, which might be compromised by a 3 stairway. 4 12 . Bob McIntosh, Mr. Barker' s son-in-law, explained their family 5 trust. Mr. McIntosh clarified also that the concern with the beach 6 house was a lack of line-of-sight. Mr. McIntosh also expressed 7 concern over possible encroachment onto his property where the common 8 property line extends at an angle to the shoreline — not 9 perpendicular. In addition, he pointed out that they commercially 10 farm the beach with clams and oysters. 11 13. Debbie Randall testified that the staircase would be located at 12 least 50 feet from the common property line. They are aware of the 13 property line issue, and are taking a conservative approach. 14 14 . With regard to security, Debbie Randall testified in her initial 15 presentation and elaborated in rebuttal testimony that they are 16 proposing a retractable staircase. Further, they could design it to 17 include a locking device. 18 15 . Stephanie Burke, Applicant, testified that they lived across the 19 street and needed the staircase for access to their tidelands. 20 21 REVIEW CRITERIA 22 APPLICABLE JEFFERSON COUNTY ORDINANCES: 23 State Environmental Policy Act, Implementing Ordinance No. 7-84 24 Shoreline Management Master Program for Jefferson County, September 19, 1988 25 Jefferson County Interim Critical Areas, Ordinance No. 05-0509-94 26 Jefferson County Emergency Interim Controls, Ordinance No. 06-0828-98 27 Jefferson County Land Use Application Procedures, Ordinance No. 04-0828-98 28 Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan, adopted August 28, 1998 29 John &Stephanie Burke Staircase Page 4 Findings, Conclusions SDP99-0010 Shoreline Conditional Use and Decision 1 CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 2 1 . The Staff Report contains a detailed analysis of the project and 3 its compliance with applicable policies and regulations. The Examine 4 has conducted a public hearing, viewed the property, reviewed the 5 Staff Report and now adopts the Staff Conclusions contained in the 6 "Staff Comment" sections of paragraphs 3 through 8 at pages 4 — 6, as 7 his own Conclusions of Law. 8 2 . The Department of Ecology suggested that the property be 9 considered for "view only" [Finding 8] . The DOE comment is valid 10 under most circumstances; however, in this instance some local 11 conditions should be considered. First, the history and size of 12 ownerships does not support a concern over cumulative impacts — at 13 least without significant subdivision proposals that would have to be 14 considered first. Second, testimony indicates that there are beach 15 uses, including clam and oyster seeding and harvesting, and since the 16 applicant ownership extends across the beach, there is a need for 17 access to the beach. Last, the Staff is recommending — and the 18 Applicant concurs — that the aesthetics of the staircase be addressed 19 to minimize the visual impact. 20 3 . The Applicant is aware of the common property line issue and is 21 taking a conservative approach to siting the staircase. The Applicant 22 proposes a retractable staircase and would agree to a locking device, 23 which is also in their best interest. 24 4 . The proposal complies with the Jefferson County Shoreline Master 25 Program and the application should be approved. 26 27 28 29 • John & Stephanie Burke Staircase SDP99-0010 Page 5 Findings, Conclusions Shoreline Conditional Use and Decision 1 DECISION 2 Based on the testimony at the Public Hearing, a site visit by the 3 Examiner, the documents and exhibits admitted into the record, and th! 4 previously made Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, it is hereby 5 the decision of the Hearing Examiner that the Shoreline Substantial 6 Development Conditional Use application by John and Stephanie Burke b! 7 APPROVED, subject to the following conditions : 8 1 . All conditions contained in the Hydraulic Project Approval issue. by the Department of Fish and Wildlife for this project shall be 9 met. The proponent shall provide the Department of Community 10 Development with a copy of the HPA issued by the Department of Fish and Wildlife prior to the onset of construction activity. 11 2. The Mitigative Measures contained in the Final Mitigated 12 Determination of Non-Significance issued by Jefferson County on 13 October 22, 1999 shall be met prior to the onset of construction activities: 14 15 ' Proper disposal of construction debris must be on land in such a manner that debris cannot enter the water body or 16 cause water quality degradation of state waters. 17 • The applicant shall follow Best Management Practices 18 pursuant to the Jefferson County Stormwater Management Ordinance. Erosion control Best Management Practices shal 19 be implemented at all times during land disturbing 20 activities. 21 • Removal of native vegetation on the bluff top shall be limited to the minimum necessary for project construction. 22 • In order to minimize visual impact, the staircase shall be 23 constructed to harmonize with the local shoreline 24 environment to the maximum extent practicable. 25 3. In order to enhance shoreline habitat, encourage slope stability, and mitigate for shoreline impact; the applicant shall be 26 required to plant three (3) individual trees from the list 27 contained on pages 37 and 38 of the Department of Ecology publication Vegetation Management: A Guide for Puget Sound Bluff 28 Property Owners. Each of the trees planted must have an erosion 29 control quality rating of either "good" or "excellent, " be of sufficient size at the time of planting to ensure survival, and John &Stephanie Burke Staircase Page 6 SDP99 0010 Shoreline Conditional Use Findings,Conclusions and Decision be planted in a location that will result in increased bluff stability and improved shoreline habitat. Examples of tree 2 species meeting these qualifications include Oregon white oak, 3 Gand fir, Douglas-fir, Bigleaf maple, and Pacific madronne. 4 4 . In order to ensure minimum visual impact, the structure shall be 5 constructed of wooden material which will weather and blend with the existing shoreline bank and can be painted, if necessary, to 6 blend with the existing shoreline bank. 7 5 . Construction shall be in substantial compliance with the site 8 plan submitted to Jefferson County on August 3, 1999 (Log Item #9) and October 7, 1999 (Log Item #28) as they exist now or are 9 hereafter amended by Jefferson County and/or the Department of Ecology. 10 11 6. No fill or other material may be placed in the waters or intertidal areas of Jefferson County. 12 7 . Work within the jurisdiction of the Shoreline Program other than 13 as described above shall receive separate review from this 14 office. 15 8 • Prior to construction, the proponent shall notify the Jefferson County Department of Community Development at (360) 379-4464 with 16 estimated project timelines for monitoring and plan compliance. 17 9. Prior to the onset of construction, the applicant shall provide 18 the Department of Community Development with the name and address of the contractor carrying out the project. 19 20 10. In order to limit the proliferation of similar stair structures in Scow Bay, the applicant is strongly encouraged to investigate 21 utilizing this structure as a joint use/joint ownership facility 22 with neighboring property owners . 23 DATED this 27th day of November 1999. 24 25 26 27 Iry Berteig 28 Jefferson County Hearing Examiner 2 9 lb John &Stephanie Burke Staircase Page 7 SDP99-0010 Shoreline Conditional Use Findings,and DConecision Decision 1 Transmitted by the Jefferson Count Permit Center to the following: 2 DATE TRANSMITTED: 3 John & Stephanie Burke, PO Box 191, Nordland, WA 98358 4 Debbie Randall, Tillman Engineering, PO Box 1375, Port Hadlock, WA 98339 5 George Barker, 6033 Flagler Road, Nordland, WA 98358 6 Bob McIntosh, 6037 Flagler Road, Nordland, WA 98358 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 John &Stephanie Burke Staircase Page 8 SDP99-0010 Findings, Conclusions Shoreline Conditional Use and Decision Jefferson County Department of Community Development /4 ;°N co 621 Sheridan Street,Port Townsend WA 98368 (360) 379-4450 7, kJ '` ; r3 '1`SFI TN��$ Universal Plot Plan Fill in the following blanks as completely as possible: Project Description: ' 7Z-!/2IA"A-Y TT' i3C 9 Digit Parcel Identification Number (from your tax statement): q Z/ 1-43 90 Site Address del4-L; ,444;4 i2 ' '=� ,,t, /�'` � n, 9 911#: Road Name: Zip Code: 160Oef Legal Description Subdivision Name: i 'K 4 Block: Lot(s): Section: e Township: 74 /(,. Range: / W41 Parcel Size (acres or square footage): Property Owner: .,/oiiitr s imRf« 86/ Ca Phone: c Mailing Address: P'6'_ /9/ A r i+r49 WA- *3 "d' Applicant/Occupant: Phone: (if different from owner) Pi'G(�N L Mailing Address: Authorized Rep: Phone: Mailing Address: General Contractor: Or Manufactured Home Installer: /3 /,�4 +5S Phone: c 2 6 8 /// Mailing Address: 3 /-' ��✓ /1/ i4-0 /1(/ ' t'// /".12/‘,/ WA- ' 3 Contractor's State License Number: Avve ,,,,cfe.‘„, Expiration Date: 4/754.00✓ Septic Designer: Phone: Mailing Address: Architect:/Engineer: 7744/wfrAi t/Ci v ��r' Phone: 379 966/ Mailing Address: p Q. g0}, 15 75 ispoloT Aexy Ge2ei, GL 4/C, .? e) Loan Lender/General Phone: Contractor's Bond Holder: Mailing Address: FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Fire District: Planning Area: School District: Zone: 1/00 H:\home\pincntr\forms\universal plot plan ., 5 n SW 114 SEC 4 T29N R1E WM Ord 4p -I ADDRESS 159I0 921 043 013 TAM 107.66 145.70 TO N E PFOP" GAR. i N1'10'27E 253.36 40 0 40 80 SCALE: 1 "=40' /ON ORIGINAL) 10 0 10 SCALE: 1 "=10' (ON ORIGINAL) ROPE PT./ 3 A.D.A. IRON PIPE k CAP 46.80 P7.1 1 ADA IRON PIPE 47.41 CONTOUR INTERVAL 1' & 10' AS MARKED ��jg U 0 Z a z ar w w Z 0 Z W W z v9 � z ct� o CC o m z Ll- w z cr z Q U� CL w U � � � Q U a z � = o o z EXP. DATEl 10 / 29 DATE: 9/13/201 SCALE: NOT, JOB NO: FILE: BURKE 1-2-3- DRAWN: SHEET C 2 OF 4 SHE[