Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout7b. 06 25 2024 - Jefferson County - Middle Housing Code Audit Memo with Gap Report 1 Middle Housing Gap Report Code Audit Memo with Recommendations for Middle Housing-Related Amendments Jefferson County | June 2024 Contents Introduction ........................................................................................................................................... 3 New State Requirements for Middle Housing ..................................................................................................... 3 Relationship to County’s Comprehensive Plan ..................................................................................................... 3 Relationship to County’s Code ................................................................................................................................ 4 Summary of Findings & Recommendations .......................................................................................... 6 Gap Analysis Framework ..................................................................................................................... 6 Review of Code Guidance Resources ................................................................................................................... 6 HB 1110 ................................................................................................................................................................ 6 Commerce Model Ordinance ............................................................................................................................ 9 HB 1337 ................................................................................................................................................................ 9 SB 6015 .............................................................................................................................................................. 11 HB 1998 .............................................................................................................................................................. 11 Code Review ....................................................................................................................................... 12 Density ....................................................................................................................................................................... 12 Zoning .................................................................................................................................................................. 12 Zero Lot Lines...................................................................................................................................................... 13 Housing Types .......................................................................................................................................................... 14 Allowed Residential Uses ................................................................................................................................. 14 Unit Lot Subdivisions .......................................................................................................................................... 15 Parking ...................................................................................................................................................................... 15 Off-Street Parking ............................................................................................................................................ 15 Parking Design ................................................................................................................................................... 16 Development Standards & Review Process ....................................................................................................... 16 Development Standards ................................................................................................................................... 16 Review Process ................................................................................................................................................... 17 Definitions ................................................................................................................................................................. 17 Findings ................................................................................................................................................................ 18 Other Considerations.............................................................................................................................................. 18 Transportation Impact Fees.............................................................................................................................. 18 Other – For Discussion with County ................................................................................................................ 19 Helpful Resources ................................................................................................................................ 20 Jefferson County| Middle Housing Gap Report June 2024 2 Exhibits Exhibit 1. Summary of New State Requirements and Applicability to the County Code ................................. 4 Exhibit 2. Summary of Gap Analysis Findings .......................................................................................................... 6 Exhibit 3. Residential Zones Densities and Dimensions for Irondale and Port Hadlock UGA ........................ 13 Exhibit 4. Residential Land Uses – Dwelling Unit Types and Accessory Uses ................................................... 14 Exhibit 5. Minimum Off-Street Parking Requirements ........................................................................................... 15 Jefferson County| Middle Housing Gap Report June 2024 3 Introduction Jefferson County is updating its Comprehensive Plan and development regulations for 2025 major update. The County is required to update its regulations to comply with new state legislation adopted in 2023 and 2024. This code update will support implementation of housing policies in the draft 2025 Comprehensive Plan. State law applies to a number of cities where the middle housing standards would be mandatory. The County received a grant to include middle housing regulations within its unincorporate urban growth areas (UGA) in Irondale and Port Hadlock. Based on the population (less than 25,000), tier 3 middle housing requirements should be considered for Irondale and Port Hadlock UGA. Conducting a gap analysis will identify barriers to middle housing in the code and provide a path forward for code updates and adoption. New State Requirements for Middle Housing House Bill (HB)1110 was adopted in 2023 and established new middle housing requirements for Washington jurisdictions. Under the middle housing regulations, communities must allow middle housing types and at least two dwelling units per lot in residential zones, with some exceptions. HB 1337 was also adopted in 2023 and has related requirements for accessory dwelling units (ADUs). Under this law, at least two ADUs per lot must be allowed in residential zones in cities and UGAs. HB 1998 requires communities to allow co-living. The details of HB 1110, HB 1337 and HB 1998 are described in the Gap Analysis Framework section of this memo. In 2024 the state legislature adopted more bills to clarify the state’s middle housing framework. HB 2321 makes a few technical changes to clarify the new middle housing requirements in HB 1110. Senate Bill (SB) 5258 includes provisions to increase the supply and affordability of townhome and condominium units, including a requirement for cities to ensure transportation impacts fees for new smaller housing units are proportionately smaller than for single family housing units, and a requirement for cities to allow unit lot subdivisions in short plats. Unit lot subdivisions are a type of subdivision that allow division of a parent lot into separately owned unit lots; they may include a commonly owned area. SB 6015 creates additional restrictions on what a jurisdiction can require in their parking standards to facilitate the construction of infill housing; the new restrictions are listed in the Gap Analysis Framework section of this memo. Engrossed Substitute House Bill (ESHB) 1293 establishes that local governments may not impose aesthetic standards or requirements for design review that are more restrictive for ADUs than those for principal units. Relationship to County’s Comprehensive Plan The County is in the process of completing a major update of its Comprehensive Plan. The Housing Element of the Comprehensive Plan will be updated to comply with new housing requirements under HB What is Middle Housing? State law defines middle housing as “buildings that are compatible in scale, form, and character with single-family houses and contain two or more attached, stacked, or clustered homes including duplexes, triplexes, fourplexes, fiveplexes, sixplexes, townhouses, stacked flats, courtyard apartments, and cottage housing.” (RCW 36.70A.030) Jefferson County| Middle Housing Gap Report June 2024 4 1220. The final plan will be adopted in 2025. The new policy language in 2025 Comprehensive Plan will support middle housing types within Irondale/Port Hadlock UGA, updating county code to comply with state law and reducing barriers for middle housing development. Relationship to County’s Code Middle housing requirements would apply to Irondale/Port Hadlock UGA. Based on the population in this area (less than 25,000), tier 3 middle housing requirements should be considered. This gap report identifies code updates needed for full compliance with state middle housing requirements. This also includes a review of new housing laws applicable to the overall county code. The gap report suggests optional code updates for consideration that could further improve County support for meeting community housing needs described in the 2025 Comprehensive Plan. Exhibit 1 summarizes the new requirements and their applicability in the County Code. Exhibit 1. Summary of New State Requirements and Applicability to the County Code New Statutes and Requirements Applicable Areas/ Code Sections to Update House Bill (HB) 1110 – Middle Housing New middle housing requirements for some Washington jurisdictions. Under the middle housing regulations, communities must allow middle housing types and at least two dwelling units per lot in residential zones, with some exceptions. ESSB 5963 – Grant support for middle housing HB 2321 – Clarifies and amends HB 1110 Irondale/Port Hadlock UGA JCC 18.18.050 Table 3A-2 - Allow 2 du/ lot (duplexes) (add exceptions - does not apply to lots after subdivision below 1,000 square feet unless the there is a smaller allowable lot size in the zone.) JCC 18.18.040, Table 3A1 – Allow other middle housing type triplexes, fourplexes, fiveplexes, sixplexes, townhouses, stacked flats, courtyard apartments, and cottage housing (Optional for tier 3) Dimensional standards and permit process cannot be more restrictive than single-family Administrative design review JCC 18.30.100 Table 6-2 – modify parking requirements for duplexes and Multifamily residential (3+ units) on lots 6000 square feet or less – maximum one off-street parking JCC 18.18.080, 18.30.100 Parking – For middle housing, no off-street parking shall be required within one-half mile walking distance of a major transit stop JCC 18.10 - Update/ add definitions – middle housing, duplex, zero lot lines Jefferson County| Middle Housing Gap Report June 2024 5 HB 1337 – ADU At least two ADUs (both attached, both detached, or one attached and one detached) per lot must be allowed in residential zones in urban growth areas (UGAs) within all zones in urban growth areas where single family homes are permitted. County UGAs / Irondale/Port Hadlock UGA JCC 18.30.020 - Allow two ADUs per lot. JCC 18.20.020 (2)(a) May not establish a maximum gross floor area requirement for ADUs that is less than 1,000 square feet (Already in compliance 1250 square feet) JCC 18.20.020 (2)(b) - Not to require owner occupancy. JCC 18.30.100 Table 6-2 – clarify ADU off-street parking requirements No on-site parking standards may be applied to ADUs located within a half-mile of a major transit stop JCC 18.18.050 - Not to impose setback requirements, yard coverage limits, tree retention mandates, or restrictions on entry door location that are more restrictive than those required for the principal unit JCC 18.18.050 – not to impose height limits less than 24 ft JCC Article 18.35 - Not to prohibit condominium sale (also see unit lot development SB 5258) Should not require more than 50% of impact fees charged for the principal unit HB 1998 – Co-Living1 Requires communities to allow co-living on any lot located within an urban growth area that allows at least six multifamily residential units, including mixed use zoning. Irondale/Port Hadlock UGA JCC 18.18 and 18.30.020 – allow co-living JCC 18.10 - update definitions to add co-living HB 1220 – Housing and Equity Requires communities to plan for and accommodate housing affordable to all economic segments of the population of this state. Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and Development Regulations JCC code – various sections for consistency Senate Bill (SB) 5258 – Unit Lot Subdivision This requires cities, towns and counties (RCW 58.17.060(3)) to allow unit lot subdivisions in their short plat regulations, to facilitate townhome and condominium development. Lower transportation impact fee Countywide / Irondale/Port Hadlock UGA JCC Article 18.35, Land Divisions – include unit lot subdivisions SB 6015 – Parking Standards New rules for residential parking standards that cities and counties must enforce. Countywide / Irondale/Port Hadlock UGA JCC 18.30.100 Table 6-2 - clarify ADU off-street parking requirements ESHB 1293 – Design Review May not impose aesthetic standards or requirements for design review that are more restrictive for ADUs than those for principal units. Irondale/Port Hadlock UGA JCC 18.18.110 1. "Co-living housing" means a residential development with sleeping units that are independently rented and lockable and provide living and sleeping space, and residents share kitchen facilities with other sleeping units in the building. Local governments may use other names to refer to co-living housing including, but not limited to, congregate living facilities, single room occupancy, rooming house, boarding house, lodging house, and residential suites. Jefferson County| Middle Housing Gap Report June 2024 6 Summary of Findings & Recommendations Exhibit 2 below is a summary of findings from the gap analysis. This applies mostly for middle housing in the Irondale and Port Hadlock area with some updates required countywide. These are discussed in the Code Review section of this memo. Exhibit 2. Summary of Gap Analysis Findings Topic Changes Recommended to County Code? Yes No Density Zoning X Zero Lot Lines X Housing Types Allowed Middle Housing X Allow ADU X Unit Lot Subdivisions X Parking Off Street Parking X Parking Design X Development Standards & Review Process Development Standards X Review Process X Definitions Middle Housing Definitions X ADU definition X Other Considerations Transportation Impact Fees X Source: BERK, 2024. Gap Analysis Framework Review of Code Guidance Resources HB 1110 The “middle housing” bill, or HB 1110, requires certain jurisdictions to allow middle housing. Middle housing is residential buildings that are compatible with single-family homes that contain two or more Jefferson County| Middle Housing Gap Report June 2024 7 units per lot. “Middle housing types” include duplexes, triplexes, fourplexes, fiveplexes, sixplexes, townhouses, courtyard apartments, cottage housing, and stacked flats. Below is a summary of HB 1110 requirements. The Commerce guideline also calls for maintaining anti-displacement policies as follows: “While creating more housing options, it is essential for cities to identify areas at higher risk of displacement and establish anti-displacement policies as required in Engrossed Second Substitute House Bill No. 1220.” Middle Housing Requirements The requirements in HB 1110 vary by jurisdiction, population size and location. Irondale/Port Hadlock UGA has a population of less than 25,000, making it a tier 3 community per Commerce’s model ordinance. The corresponding requirements for middle housing code are listed below: Density  Development of at least two units per lot.  Zero lot line short subdivisions to create lots for each unit allowed per the above requirement. Housing Types  Number of middle housing types needed to meet the middle housing density requirements.  Jefferson County’s Irondale/Port Hadlock UGA is a tier 3 community. Middle housing type requirements for Tier 3 were clarified in 2024 with HB 2321. Tier 3 Cities may choose the number of types of middle housing to allow to meet minimum residential density requirements (HB 2321 Final Bill Report).  Tier 1 and tier 2 Cities are required to allow at least six of nine types of middle housing to achieve their unit density requirement (RCW 36.70A.635(5)). The nine types are: duplexes, triplexes, fourplexes, fiveplexes, sixplexes, townhouses, stacked flats, courtyard apartments, and cottage housing (RCW 36.70A.030.26).  Cities may allow ADUs to achieve the required middle housing unit density, even though they are not one of the nine types of middle housing (RCW 36.70A.635(5)). Parking  Lots over 6,000 sq ft: Two or fewer off-street parking spaces per unit (RCW 36.70A.635(6)(f)).  Lots 6,000 sq ft or smaller: Local government shall not require one or fewer off-street parking spaces per unit (RCW 36.70A.635(6)(e)).  HB 2321 clarified parking requirements for lots that are exactly 6,000 square feet. A city may not require more than one off-street parking space per unit for middle housing constructed on lots that are exactly 6,000 square feet before any zero lot line subdivisions or lot splits (HB 2321 Final Bill Report).  Parking requirements of HB 1110 are not required if:  A parking study finds that the application of the parking limitations of for middle housing will be significantly less safe for vehicle drivers or passengers, pedestrians, or bicyclists than if the jurisdiction's parking requirements were applied to the same location for the same number of detached houses. (RCW 36.70A.635(7)(a).  Portions of the city that are within a one-mile radius of a commercial airport with at least 9,000,000 annual enplanements (RCW 36.70A.635(7)(b). Jefferson County| Middle Housing Gap Report June 2024 8 Development Standards & Review Process  Development standards and a review process that are not more restrictive for middle housing than those for detached single-family residences (RCW 36.70A.635(6) (b-c)).  A review process no more rigorous than administrative design review (RCW 36.70A.635(6)(a)). Administrative design review must follow the standards of RCW 36.70A.630, which was established in 2023 under HB 1293, and calls for only clear and objective regulations. General Exceptions The requirements of HB 1110 do not apply to:  Lots with designated critical areas and their buffers (RCW 36.70A.635(8)(a)).  HB 2321 was adopted in 2024 and clarified how this exception applies. According to the Final Bill Report, the exemption for lots with critical areas or their buffers is limited to the portion of the parcel with a critical area or buffer, except for critical aquifer recharge areas where a single- family detached house is an allowed use provided that any requirements to maintain aquifer recharge are met.  A watershed serving reservoir for potable water (if that watershed was listed as impaired or threatened under CWA) (RCW 36.70A.635(8)(b)).  County-designated urban separators (RCW 36.70A.635(8)(c)).  Lots smaller than 1,000 square feet after subdivision, unless the County chooses to enact smaller allowable lot sizes (RCW 36.70A.635(6)(g)). Middle Housing Definitions In addition to complying with the middle housing requirements described above, Jefferson County should update its code definitions for middle housing for consistency with state law.  Middle Housing: HB 1110 defines middle housing as buildings compatible in scale, form, and character with single-family houses. These buildings contain two or more attached, stacked, or clustered homes, including duplexes, triplexes, fourplexes, fiveplexes, sixplexes, townhouses, stacked flats, courtyard apartments, and cottage housing. (RCW 36.70A.030(26)) Definitions for these types of housing are listed below.  Duplex: a residential building with two attached dwelling units.  Triplex: a residential building with three attached dwelling units.  Fourplex: a residential building with four attached dwelling units.  Fiveplex: a residential building with five attached dwelling units.  Sixplex: a residential building with six attached dwelling units.  Townhouses: residential buildings that contain three or more attached single-family dwelling units that extend from foundation to roof and that have a yard or public way on not less than two sides.  Stacked flat: dwelling units in a residential building of no more than three stories on a residential zoned lot in which each floor may be separately rented or owned.  Courtyard apartments: attached dwelling units arranged on two or three sides of a yard or court. Jefferson County| Middle Housing Gap Report June 2024 9  Cottage housing: residential units on a lot with a common open space that either: (a) is owned in common; or (b) has units owned as condominium units with property owned in common and a minimum of 20 percent of the lot size as open space. Implementation Considerations Cities must act to implement HB 1110 within six months of its Comprehensive Plan periodic update deadline, or the Commerce model ordinance will supersede the City’s development regulations until the City does so (RCW 36.70A. 635 (11)(a)). According to the grant timeline, Jefferson County has until June 2025 to update its code for compliance. When the County adopts its updated code, it will be protected from legal challenges. Amendments to development regulations and other non-project actions taken to implement HB 1110 are not subject to administrative or judicial appeals (RCW 43.21C.495(1)). Commerce Model Ordinance In 2024 the Washington State Department of Commerce (Commerce) published middle housing model ordinances and user guides to help local jurisdictions implement the requirements of HB 1110, consistent with RCW 36.70A.635. There is a model ordinance for tier 1 and tier 2 Cities, a model ordinance for Tier 3 Cities, and a user guide covering both ordinances. The tier 3 model ordinance applies to Jefferson County Irondale/Port Hadlock UGA and is the one referred to in this memo. The model ordinance is organized into specific topic areas such as unit density, dimensional standards, and parking standards. It outlines specific provisions from RCW 36.70A.635 that cities subject to the law must implement, as well as optional standards that cities may choose to adopt some, none, or all. The model ordinance makes this distinction by bolding the text that are required provisions and leaving the optional standards non-bolded. The model ordinance and associated user guide outline areas where there is local policy choice, offering suggestions and best practices, not required by HB 1110, that Jefferson County could consider incorporating in its code update. The user guide also offers suggestions on development and design standards – such as updating setbacks and lot coverage standards to incentivize middle housing. HB 1337 ADU Requirements HB 1337 requires jurisdictions (cities and counties’ UGAs) to allow two ADUs per lot (both attached, both detached, or one attached and one detached) within all zones in urban growth areas where single family homes are permitted (RCW 36.70A.681(1)(c)). Local governments must comply with HB 1337 within six months after their comprehensive plan periodic update deadline, making the deadline for Jefferson County June, 2026 (RCW 36.70A.680(1)(a)). Additional requirements of HB 1337 are listed below. Development Standards  May not require owner occupancy on the property and may not prohibit the sale as independent units (36.70A.681(1)(b)).  May not charge more than 50% of impact fees charged for the principal unit (RCW (36.70A.681(1)(a)). Jefferson County| Middle Housing Gap Report June 2024 10  Must allow an ADU on any lot that meets the minimum lot size required for the principal unit (36.70A.681(1)(e)).  May not establish a maximum gross floor area requirement for ADUs that is less than 1,000 square feet (36.70A.681(1)(f)).  May not establish roof height limit of less than 24 feet, unless the height limitation applies to the principal unit (36.70A.681(1)(g)).  May not impose development regulations and restrictions that are more restrictive than those for principal units (36.70A.681(1)(h)).  Must allow detached ADUs to be sited at a lot line that abuts a public alley (36.70A.681(1)(i)).  Must allow ADUs to be converted from existing structures (36.70A.681(1)(j)).  May not prohibit the sale or other conveyance independently of a principal unit solely on the grounds that the condominium unit was originally built as an ADU (36.70A.681(1)(k)).  May not require public street improvements as a condition of permitting ADUs (36.70A.681(1)(l)). Parking  May not require off-street parking within one-half mile walking distance of a major transit stop (36.70A.681(2)(a)(i)).  A major transit stop is defined as a stop on a high-capacity transportation system, commuter rail stops, stops on rail or fixed guideway systems, and stops on bus rapid transit routes (HB 2321 Final Bill Report).  May not require more than one off-street parking space per unit on lots 6,000 square feet or smaller (36.70A.681(2)(a)(ii)).  May not require more than two off-street parking spaces per unit on lots greater than 6,000 square feet (36.70A.681(2)(a)(iii)). Exceptions  A parking study finds that the application of the parking limitations of for middle housing will be significantly less safe for vehicle drivers or passengers, pedestrians, or bicyclists than if the jurisdiction's parking requirements were applied to the same location for the same number of detached houses (RCW 36.70A.681(2)(b)(i)).  Portions of the area that are within one-mile radius of a commercial airport with at least 9,000,000 annual enplanements (RCW 36.70A.681(2)(b)(ii)).  Lots with designated critical areas or their buffers, or to a watershed serving a reservoir for potable water that is or was listed as impaired or threatened under the CWA (RCW 36.70A.681(4)). ADU Definitions ADU definitions provided in state law are listed below. (RCW 36.70A.696(1-2)(5))  Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU): a dwelling unit located on the same lot as a single-family housing unit, duplex, triplex, townhome, or other housing unit.  Attached ADU: an ADU located within or attached to a single-family housing unit, duplex, triplex, townhome, or other housing unit. Jefferson County| Middle Housing Gap Report June 2024 11  Detached ADU: an ADU that consists partly or entirely of a building that is separate and detached from a single-family housing unit, duplex, triplex, townhome, or other housing unit and is on the same property. SB 6015 Parking Standards SB 6015 was adopted in 2024 and established new rules for residential parking standards that cities and counties must enforce. These rules are listed below (SB 6015 Final Bill Report).  Garages and carports may not be required as a way to meet minimum parking requirements for residential development.  Parking spaces that count towards minimum parking requirements may be enclosed or unenclosed.  Parking spaces in tandem count towards meeting minimum parking requirements at a rate of one space for every 20 linear feet, with any necessary provisions for turning radius.  The existence of non-conforming gravel surfacing in existing designated parking areas may not be a reason for prohibiting the use of existing space in the parking area to meet local parking standards.  Parking spaces may not be required to exceed 8 feet by 20 feet, except for required parking for people with disabilities.  Parking spaces that consist of grass block pavers may count towards minimum parking requirements. HB 1998 HB 1998 effective June 2024 allows co-living. Communities are required to allow co-living on any lot located within an urban growth area that allows at least six multifamily residential units, including mixed use zoning. This includes any lots required to allow six middle housing units. By December 31, 2025, a fully planning city or county must adopt development regulations allowing co-living housing on any lot located within a UGA (Final Bill). "Co-living housing" means a residential development with sleeping units that are independently rented and lockable and provide living and sleeping space, and residents share kitchen facilities with other sleeping units in the building. Local governments may use other names to refer to co-living housing including, but not limited to, congregate living facilities, single room occupancy, rooming house, boarding house, lodging house, and residential suites. A fully planning city or county may not:  Require room dimensional standards larger than that required by state building code, or a mix of unit sizes, or to include other uses within a UGA that allows at least six multifamily residential units, including on a lot zoned for mixed use development.  Treat a co-living unit as more than ¼ housing unit for density calculations, or ½ unit for the purpose of connection fees  Require standards that are more restrictive than those required for other multifamily uses in the same zone.  Exclude co-living housing from participating in affordable housing incentive programs Jefferson County| Middle Housing Gap Report June 2024 12  Require more than 0.25 parking spaces per sleeping unit (unless an empirical study demonstrates more is needed, or the housing is located in a portion of a city within a 1-mile radius of a commercial airport in Washington with at least 9 million annual enplanements)  Require off street parking within 0.50 mile of a major transit stop Code Review Density Zoning Zoning codes for Irondale and Port Hadlock UGA are found in Jefferson County UDC Chapter 18.18. The County’s standards for densities and dimensions are shown in Exhibit 3. As a tier 3 community, Jefferson County should allow at least two units per lot. As shown in Exhibit 3, Irondale and Port Hadlock UGA currently regulates allowed density based on dwelling units per acre. Standard densities apply to development based on the availability of on-site septic and sanitary sewer systems. The code needs updating to incorporate at least two units per lot. Jefferson County| Middle Housing Gap Report June 2024 13 Exhibit 3. Residential Zones Densities and Dimensions for Irondale and Port Hadlock UGA Urban Commercial Visitor-Oriented Commercial Urban Low Density Residential Urban Moderate Density Residential Urban High Density Residential Urban Light Industrial Public UC VOC ULDR UMDR UHDR ULI P Allowed Residential Density NA NA 4-6 du/ac 7-12 du/ac 13-18 du/ac NA NA Note: Standard densities apply to development with connection required to sanitary sewer system. On-site sewer code allows minimum 12,500 sq. ft. lot for on-site septic systems with waivers possible to approximately minimum 7,500 sq. ft. However, the code does not allow waivers less than 12,500 sq. ft. for lots within critical aquifer recharge areas (CARAs). Therefore, standard density in the ULDR zone (inside CARAs and outside of phased sewer service areas where sewer service is available) is approximately 3.5 DUs/acre. Standard density of 4 DUs/acre in the ULDR zone (outside CARAs and outside of phased sewer service areas where sewer is available) may be achieved only by compliance with the waiver provisions of the on-site septic code. Maximum density of 6 DUs/acre in the ULDR is only achievable by connection to sanitary sewer. Minimum lot area None specified. Lot sizes shall be sufficient to meet the public health and environmental protection standards contained in the Jefferson County regulations. Ability to subdivide is regulated by the permitted development density. Minimum front or street setback Varies by street categories from 0 (alley) to 35 feet (Principal Arterial) Minimum rear and Side Yard setback (1) 5 5 5 5 5 10 20 Maximum Building Dimensions Note: Maximum building height recommended for increase from 35 feet to 70 feet in all commercial/industrial zones and in urban residential high-density zones to allow for and accommodate increased densities. Building height (feet) 70 70 35 35 70 70 70 Lot Coverage, Buildings Only (%) No maximum (2) No maximum (2) 60 70 70 No maximum (2) 1 Special rear and side setbacks:  Wherever a light industrial use is proposed to abut a commercial or residential use or zone, the setback shall be 25 feet, unless otherwise specified in this code.  Wherever a commercial use is proposed to abut a residential use or zone, the setback shall be 10 feet, unless otherwise specified in this code. 2 Adequate space must be provided for required parking, setbacks, landscaping, utilities, septic system (if no sewer available) and stormwater management facilities, as applicable. Source: JCC 18.18.050 Table 3A2, May 2024. Findings  Base Density Definition: Jefferson County should update its code for Irondale and Port Hadlock UGA to allow a minimum of two dwelling units per lot in all residential zones unless exceptions apply, and it should define the exceptions. Zero Lot Lines The County code is silent about zero lot lines. Findings  Zero Lot Lines: Updates needed to add zero lot lines. Jefferson County| Middle Housing Gap Report June 2024 14 Housing Types Allowed Residential Uses Irondale and Port Hadlock UGA allowed residential uses are shown in Exhibit 4, which shows relevant information from the permitted use table in JCC 18.18.040 Table 3A-1. The allowed uses include duplexes and ADUs. Triplexes, fourplexes, fiveplexes, and sixplexes are not mentioned but are allowed under multifamily residential units (3+ units). Exhibit 4. Residential Land Uses – Dwelling Unit Types and Accessory Uses Key: Yes – Allowed subject to compliance Use, D – Conditional Use C – Conditional Use Urban Commercial Visitor-Oriented Commercial Urban Low Density Residential Urban Moderate Density Residential Urban High Density Residential Urban Light Industrial Public UC VOC ULDR UMDR UHDR ULI P Single-family residences Existing only Existing only Yes Yes No No No Duplexes (subject to meeting underlying density requirements) Existing only Existing only Yes Yes No No No Multifamily residential units (3+ units) Existing only Existing only No Yes Yes No No Accessory dwelling units Existing only Existing only Yes Yes Yes No No Source: JCC 18.18.040, Table 3A1, May 2024. Under tier 3 category, Jefferson County can choose the number of middle housing types to allow in the code to meet minimum residential density requirements. Allowed housing types are mostly consistent with state middle housing requirements. The code allows duplexes subject to meeting underlying density requirements. This is in conflict with the unit density per lot requirements in HB 1110. Accessory Dwelling Units The County’s ADU standards do not comply with the requirements of HB 1337, which are listed earlier in this memo. JCC 18.30.020 (4) states: Except as may be specifically provided elsewhere in this code, only one dwelling unit and one accessory dwelling unit per lot is allowed in those districts that permit residential uses. Findings  Middle Housing Types: Zoning code is mostly consistent with state requirements for middle housing types. The County should remove the underlying density requirement for duplexes. The County could expand allowed uses to include triplexes and other middle housing types in ULDR zone. County could add other middle housing types (triplexes, fourplexes, fiveplexes, sixplexes, townhouses, stacked flats, courtyard apartments) in the allowed use table for clarity  Cottage Housing: The permitted use table in JCC 18.18.040, Table 3A1 can be updated to include cottage housing as an allowed use. Jefferson County| Middle Housing Gap Report June 2024 15  ADUs: The code is out of compliance with state law for ADU regulations established under HB 1337. The County’s ADU requirements (JCC 18.30.020) should be updated to allow two ADUs per lot in any configuration of attached or detached ADUs. This also includes updates such as, not requiring owner occupancy, clarifying ADU size and off-street parking requirements, not requiring more than 50% of impact fees charged for the principal unit etc. (See Exhibit 1). Unit Lot Subdivisions Another consideration for missing middle housing types is compliance with SB 5258 and RCW 58.17.060(3). This requires cities, towns and counties to allow unit lot subdivisions in their short plat regulations, to facilitate townhome and condominium development. JCC Chapter 18.35 Article III contains the County’s short plat regulations. The code does not currently address unit lot subdivisions and should be updated to do so. Findings  Unit Lot Subdivisions: Jefferson County should update its short plat regulations in JCC Chapter 18.35 Article III to state that unit lot subdivisions are allowed, consistent with RCW 58.17.060(3). Parking Off-street parking requirements for most residential uses are provided in JCC 18.30.100 Table 6-2, as shown in Exhibit 5. The off-street parking requirement for ADUs is not mentioned in the code. Exhibit 5. Minimum Off-Street Parking Requirements Land Use Minimum Parking Spaces Required Residential Single-family residential unit 2.0 per dwelling unit Two-family residential unit 2.0 per dwelling unit Multifamily residential (3+ units) 1.5 per dwelling unit Mobile home park 2.0 per dwelling unit Unnamed residential uses [Determined by the administrator] Source: JCC 18.30.100 Table 6-2, April 2024. Off-Street Parking As shown in Exhibit 5, the County’s code determines off-street parking requirements for residential uses based on dwelling units. HB 1110 calls for using a combination of lot size and dwelling units to determine middle housing parking requirements. Under HB 1110, the maximum number of off-street parking spots that can be required for lots of 6000 square feet or smaller is one per dwelling unit. The County code requires two per dwelling unit for duplexes and 1.5 per triplexes or more units. The County allows duplexes (Exhibit 4) but they are listed in JCC 18.30.100 Table 6-2 as “Two-family residential unit”. Duplexes are defined in JCC 18.10.040 as “Dwelling unit, two-family.” The County can choose to use one consistent term for duplex. Jefferson County| Middle Housing Gap Report June 2024 16 The County allows ADUs which helps meet the middle housing density requirements in HB 1110. The County doesn’t have specific requirements for off-street parking for ADU. Findings  Calculating Minimum Requirements: Jefferson County should modify its minimum off-street parking requirements for duplexes and Multifamily residential (3+ units) to comply with HB 1110.  New Middle Housing Types: If new middle housing types are selected, Jefferson County should update the JCC 18.30.100 Table 6-2 to clarify minimum off-street parking requirements for middle housing types not currently specified.  ADUs: The County should consider listing ADU off-street parking requirements in the table in JCC 18.30.100 Table 6-2. Parking Design SB 6015 establishes new rules for residential parking standards, including limitations on what can be required to meet minimum parking requirements. These new rules apply to middle housing parking requirements and are listed in the Gap Analysis Framework section of this memo. The County code is silent about the type of off-street parking for residential, whether enclosed or unenclosed. The County code JCC 18.30.100 could be updated to clarify that garages and carports may not be required for off-street parking, tandem parking space to be counted towards meeting minimum parking requirement, not to require parking size beyond 8 feet by 20 feet and allow grass block pavers. JCC 18.30.100 (3)(a) currently requires off-street parking to be an all-weather surface. This can be amended for residential parking. Findings  Tandem Parking: Jefferson County should clarify its municipal code by defining the rate at which tandem parking spaces count towards meeting minimum residential parking requirements, consistent with SB 6015.  Size and type: Update the code to clarify allowing unenclosed parking for residential uses.  Surface: Update code to allow grass block pavers surface. Development Standards & Review Process HB 1110 requires that cities may not have development regulations for middle housing that are more restrictive than for detached single-family residences. This includes, but is not limited to, building height, setbacks, lot coverage, floor area ratio, lot area and dimension, impervious surface, open space, and landscaped area standards. Additionally, cities may not require a review process more strict than administrative design review for middle housing. This applies to Irondale/Port Hadlock UGA. Development Standards JCC Chapter 18.18 includes development regulations for Irondale and Port Hadlock UGA in JCC 18.18.050 Table 3A2. Exhibit 3 indicates these development standards for density, setback, height, and lot coverage. These standards are not specific to any single housing type. Setback standards are based Jefferson County| Middle Housing Gap Report June 2024 17 on road categories. Setback from local access roads can be updated from 20 feet to 15 feet per middle hosing recommendation. Findings  JCC Sections 18.18.050 - 0.7.0 establish various standards related to density, dimension, performance and landscaping standards for all development types. There are no separate requirements for middle housing.  in JCC 18.18.050 Table 3A2 should be updated to reflect setback and height standards for middle housing types. Review Process The review process for residential development in Jefferson County is determined by the permitted use table in JCC 18.18.040, Table 3A1and the permit type table in JCC 18.40.040. There do not appear to be any development review conditions for duplexes, townhomes, or cottage housing that are more restrictive than for single family homes. The decision type table does not mention specific residential uses; it appears to apply equally to all residential uses. JCC 18.40.440(2) includes site development application requirements specific to multifamily residential uses. However, this doesn’t apply to Irondale and Port Hadlock UGA. Findings  Review Process: Update the review process for administrative review. Definitions JCC 18.10 provides definitions for land use terms. Definitions for different types of dwelling units are listed below. Updates to these definitions should be made for consistency with state law and to avoid confusion.  “Accessory dwelling unit” means an additional dwelling unit either in or added to an existing single- family detached dwelling, or in a separate accessory structure on the same lot as the main structure, for use as a complete, independent living facility with provisions within the accessory dwelling unit for cooking, eating, sanitation and sleeping. Such a dwelling shall be considered an accessory use to the main dwelling and be clearly subordinate to the main dwelling.  Duplex. (See “Dwelling unit, two-family.”).  Dwelling unit means one or more rooms or structures designed for occupancy by an individual or family for living and sleeping purposes, containing kitchen facilities and rooms with internal accessibility, for use solely by the dwelling’s occupants.  “Dwelling unit, multiple-family” means one or more structures containing three or more dwelling units.  “Dwelling unit, two-family” (duplex) means a single structure containing two dwelling units.  “Single-family residence” means a dwelling unit designed for and occupied by no more than one family. Jefferson County| Middle Housing Gap Report June 2024 18 The definitions of single-family attached dwelling unit or townhouses are not included in the definitions section of the code. However, they are mentioned in several sections of the code in Chapter 17, Master Plan Resort.  JCC 17.20.020(6) allows single-family attached (townhouse style) or detached dwelling units in MPR-MF zone.  JCC 17.10.030(3) includes single-family attached as conditional uses in MPR-SF zone. It states, “single- family attached dwelling units including duplexes, triplexes and fourplexes as part of a new subdivision, not to exceed a gross density of four dwelling units per acre.” This also defines single-family attached as follows: “single-family attached” shall mean a townhouse style or side-by-side development, not stacked units The County’s code needs to include definitions of townhome consistent with the state’s definitions for middle housing. The County should add definitions of triplexes and fourplexes regardless of its decision to allow triplexes and fourplexes in the middle housing types since these are already mentioned in the existing code. Additionally, the County needs to add definitions of any other additional middle housing types it chooses to add. The County should also update its ADU definition to be consistent with state law. Additionally, the County needs to add definition of co-living to be consistent with HB 1998, and unit lot subdivision to be consistent with SB 5258. Findings  Middle Housing Terminology: The County should align its code with state middle housing terminology by adopting the language and definitions used in RCW 36.70A.030(26). This includes adding or clarifying the term “dwelling unit, single-family attached,” adding the state definition of middle housing, townhouse, and adding the state definitions for any additional middle housing types the County chooses to allow.  Add definitions: The County should add definitions of triplexes and fourplexes regardless since these are already mentioned in the existing code.  ADU Terminology: The County should replace its definition of “Accessory dwelling unit” with the three ADU definitions in RCW 36.70A.696(1-2)(5).  Co-living Definition: Add definition of co-living consistent with HB 1998.  Unit lot subdivision. Add definition of unit lot subdivision consistent with HB 5258. Other Considerations Transportation Impact Fees New laws were passed in 2024 and 2023 requiring lower transportation impact fees (TIF) for smaller residential units and ADUs, compared to TIFs for standard single-family homes. These laws are intended to reduce development barriers for middle housing and ADUs, and reflect the fact that these types of housing may have a lower impact on traffic compared to standard single-family housing. SB 5258 requires TIFs for new smaller housing units to be proportionately smaller than for single family housing units. HB 1337 requires TIFs for ADUs to be no more than half of the TIF for the principal unit on a lot. Jefferson County| Middle Housing Gap Report June 2024 19 Jefferson County’s 2023 Fee Schedule has different TIFs for single family homes, multifamily homes, mobile home parks, and senior housing. The TIF for single family homes is the same as for duplexes. There is no TIF listed for ADUs or for other types of middle housing such as townhomes. Findings  Transportation Impact Fees: The County’s fee table should be updated for compliance with SB 5258 and HB 1337. Other – For Discussion with County  The County may consider updating setback and height standards for the Irondale and Port Hadlock area for all street types in coordination with access to lots. For example, restricting or regulating direct access from a principal arterial.  Explore progressive standards to incentivize middle housing over lower density types.  Commerce Model Ordinance User Guide recommends examining the applicability of local version of International Building Code (IBC) and International Residential Code (IRC). The IRC applies to buildings with one or two dwelling units and townhouses not more than three stories above grade and with a separate means of egress. The difference in middle housing types covered by the two building codes will affect the construction and affordability of middle housing types with three or more units in one structure. County can examine to allow structures with up to six units to be built under the International Residential Code to increase flexibility.  Review feedback from the public about the permitting process for ADU. The County can explore how to make permitting easier or incentivized throughout the County. Jefferson County| Middle Housing Gap Report June 2024 20 Helpful Resources  Washington State Department of Commerce; Washington State Housing laws of 2019 through 2024, https://deptofcommerce.app.box.com/s/jfd6j7vsgpiotketm4c09eekocovd4lc  Washington State Department of Commerce; User Guide for Middle Housing Model Ordinance, January 26, 2024, https://deptofcommerce.app.box.com/s/dip01jnz8i0o2eeuy9v8n39kcm1uc4mk  Washington State Department of Commerce; Middle Housing Model Ordinance Tier 3 Cities, https://deptofcommerce.app.box.com/s/6mrj33exlycjpdt3ryt4gfg94fqgbqqe  Washington State Department of Commerce; Middle Housing in Washington: Fact Sheet for Implementing E2SHB 1110, revised July 2023, https://deptofcommerce.app.box.com/s/yjo6h53f2jhj1xopbc6lxzo28dsh2h9k