The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About072610_ra03 Regular Agenda JEFFERSON COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AGENDA REQUEST FROM: Board of County Commissioners Philip Morley, County Administrator Stacie Hoskins, Planning Manager, Department of Community Development (DCD) Michelle McConnell, Associate Planner, DCD ~ July 26, 2010 EPA Grant Agreement for Watershed Stewardship Resource Center TO: DATE: SUBJECT: STATEMENT OF ISSUE: DCD staff requests the Board's approval of a $533,761 award via a cooperative grant assistance agreement with the U.s. Environmental Protection Agency (EPAl for a three-year Watershed Stewardship Resource Center pilot project. BACKGROUND: The Watershed Stewardship Resource Center (WSRC) will create a new voluntary customer help desk to assist land owners, developers, builders, realtors and interested citizens alike. Planned to be an optional 'one stop shop' for educational information, staff consultation and permit application assistance, the WSRC will help land owners and applicants interested in voluntary low impact development and other best management practices as a non-regulatory approach to meet existing environmental protection requirements for stormwater, critical areas, and shorelines. In so doing County citizens will have an opportunity to help protect and restore Puget Sound through this Watershed Management Assistance grant from the EPA. DCD submitted an initial grant proposal to EPA in January of this year and was notified in March that the County was selected as a finalist. DCD submitted a final application in April and EPA awarded the grant on June 28th for the Watershed Stewardship Resource Center (WSRC) three-year pilot project. Using a voluntary coaching model, land owners and the public will have the opportunity to learn more about watershed ecosystem functions, current regulatory requirements and alternative approaches to protecting the natural resources that support our economy and quality of life. Informational handouts, workshops, trainings, demonstration gardens and a video of actual projects will serve citizens who choose to learn more about sustainable and low-impact development practices. WSRC staff will assist permit applicants who want to explore project options and will help applicants to complete required paperwork accurately to streamline County review time. The WSRC will also gather input from community stakeholders through focus group meetings to explore possible improvements to existing policies and procedures. 1 Regular Agenda ATTACHMENTS: . EPA Cooperative Agreement #PO-OOJ08601-0 (three originals for signature) . WSRC Work Plan, Logic Model & Budget ANALYSIS/STRATEGIC GOALS/PROS and CONS: County-wide Planning Policy - General direction is to focus high-density development and required infrastructure services in urban areas, to protect and maintain the character of rural areas, and to avoid environmental degradation. Comprehensive Plan - The goals and policies for water resources, shorelines, air quality, natural heritage vegetation and landforms, view and noise conditions, and critical areas generally direct the County to balance environmental protection with land use activities. Strategies for management of environmental resources include watershed management and habitat recovery, consolidated environmental review regulation, critical area protection, and public safety, education and involvement. The Public Safety, Education and Involvement Strategies in Chapter 8 are: 1. Cooperatively implement, with available resources, a public education and involvement pracess to pramote citizen understanding and support of water resource protection and conservation through watershed management. 2. Support and implement programs for education of the public and the development community regarding development hazards and measures required and recommended for protection of environmental resources as funding becomes available. 3. Conduct public education programs which foster an understanding of landslide hazard areas and the role of feeder bluffs in drift cell functioning to preserve shoreline area function and values, and work with developers, homeowners, and communities to avoid and mitigate existing problems and to prevent future problems. 4. Support public education programs that promote an understanding of issues related to boater safety. 5. Develop data and procedures to coordinate the declaration of burn bans to be consistent with local monitoring information. 6. Work with environmental educotion groups to collect and disseminate information on listings and proposed listings of fish species as endangered or threatened and impacts of the listings on land use activities. By engaging the public, facilitating the education of land owners, developers, realtors and interested citizens, and by evaluating existing processes to improve regulatory provisions, the WSRC project will make real these County goals, policies and strategies. The WSRC will also help implement most of the community vision statements including: . Preserve the high quality of life. . Strive for government efficiency. 2 Regular Agenda . Support and encourage economic opportunities. . Balance urban uses and environmental protection. . Protect and retain rural lifestyles. . Protect and conserve agriculture, forest and mineral resource lands. . Protect and conserve the environment, ecologically sensitive areas, and preclude development and land uses which are incompatible with critical areas. . Respect property rights. . Encourage citizen participation and involvement. FISCAL IMPACT/COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS: Total project cost is $800,646 over three years, with $533,761 provided by EPA and $266,885 contributed by the County via matching funds/services. DCD expenditures for the project are already included in the budget. To supplement DCD, numerous community entities will partner on the project, including: . Jefferson County Environmental Health . Jefferson County Noxious Weed Board . Jefferson County Public Works . Jefferson County WSU Extension . Jefferson Land Trust . 10,000 Years Institute . Clallam County Conservation District . Clallam County WSU Extension . City of Sequim Parks Additional community organizations will also participate as supporters and stakeholders who may be credited with providing in-kind donations that exceed grant requirements. Some consultant contracts will also be awarded after a thorough RFP review process. RECOMMENDATION: Approve receipt of the Watershed Stewardship Resource Center grant award by signing the EPA Cooperative Agreement. 7~~ Date 3 Watershed Stewardship Resource Center WORK PLAN Final 5-17-10 8 N '" -ll ~ '0 '" ~ c ~ ~ ~ " , '" . -% " J ~ l\~ '.-"'" r.' I...' ....- 'J ' . . . 'r~ -: ,., < , LOW IMPACT DEVElOPMENT DEMONSTRATION PARK Cfl."""I.~'IOI<JOId~ ~ ~' .'....--- -'-.. I.~=-' :....--- i ---.. 1-"- I i----" Graphic by: Scott Havill, 2006 EDUCATION .... . INSPIRATION .:. ASSIST ANCE Jefferson County Department of Community Development 621 Sheridan Street. Port Townsend, WA 98368 3601379-4450 dcd@co.jefferson.wa.us EPA Puget Sound Watershed Management Assistance Grant Jefferson County Watershed Stewardship Resource Center – WORK PLAN ÌÝ ßÞÔÛÑÚÑÒÌÛÒÌÍ Project Summary.............................................................................................................................3 Project Budget.................................................................................................................................3 Project Management and Partners..................................................................................................3 Description of the Watershed..........................................................................................................6 Watershed Characterization:......................................................................................................7 Environmental Threats and Emerging Problems:......................................................................8 Loss of Native Vegetation and Shoreline Erosion:....................................................................9 Water Quality Impacts:..............................................................................................................9 Climate Change and Sea Level Rise:.........................................................................................9 Existing watershed plans and efforts to address the problems and threats:.............................10 Project Need..................................................................................................................................10 Project Plan...................................................................................................................................12 Element A – The Watershed Stewardship Resource Center....................................................12 Element B – Upstream Policy and Process Analysis...............................................................13 Element C – Develop Social Marketing Program....................................................................14 Element D – Development of Educational and Guidance Materials.......................................14 Element E – LID, Stormwater, and Buffer Management Workshops.....................................15 Element F – Prepare Additional Local Ordinances..................................................................16 Monitoring and Measuring...........................................................................................................16 Project Timeline and Components................................................................................................16 Anticipated Outcomes...................................................................................................................18 Page 2 of 18 EPA Puget Sound Watershed Management Assistance Grant Jefferson County Watershed Stewardship Resource Center – WORK PLAN Ð®±¶»½¬Í«³³¿®§ Jefferson County is positioned to build on extensive watershed-scale characterization work and ready to implement an innovative program to influence where future development is located and what practices are used on the ground at the site scale. This work plan is for a Watershed Stewardship Resource Center (WSRC) that will guide property owners and developers and provide the opportunity to apply sustainable development practices. The Center will make it easy for applicants to choose solutions that reduce human impact and improve ecosystem benefits. The Center will employ an innovative ‘coaching model’ to assist applicants with site design and will feature an LID demonstration garden and extensive learning resources. As a pilot project, it will provide a model and curriculum to transfer and integrate across political jurisdictions into other watersheds. The Center will be supported and complemented by a social marketing program and educational and outreach workshops. In short, the project will create a new customer service desk that will provide educational information, staff consultation, and permit application assistance to land owners, developers, builders, realtors and interested citizens alike. Designed as an optional 'one stop shop', the WSRC will promote low impact development as a voluntary solution to existing stormwater management, shoreline, critical area, and other environmental protection requirements. Ð®±¶»½¬Þ«¼¹»¬ The total budget for the Watershed Stewardship Resource Center is $800,646, which includes $533,761 in federal funds and $266,885 in non-federal matching funds from numerous partners. Financial Integrity/Budget: The attached project budget presents the level of funding for each activity, the requested federal funding and local match. Match provided by project partners is also presented. The budget also clarifies which of the partners will perform each activity. Ð®±¶»½¬Ó¿²¿¹»³»²¬¿²¼Ð¿®¬²»® As grant recipient, Jefferson County Department of Community Development (DCD) will administer the grant with project assistance coming from a broad array of partner organizations, some of whom will provide matching funds through in-kind donations of time and materials. For grant administration, the DCD Management Team will be comprised of the following: Management Team Jefferson County Department of Community Development Al Scalf, Director After working in Public Works engineering for 10 years, Al became the DCD director in 1995. He has extensive experience with grant and project management. Page 3 of 18 EPA Puget Sound Watershed Management Assistance Grant Jefferson County Watershed Stewardship Resource Center – WORK PLAN Stacie Hoskins, Planning Responsibilities include Shoreline Administrator, Critical Areas Ordinance MangerAdministrator, Flood Plain Administrator, and SEPA Responsible Official. Stacie has considerable experience in current and long range planning and has worked for Jefferson County since 2000. Michelle McConnell, As lead planner and grant administrator for four years of the Shoreline Master Associate Planner/Long Program (SMP) Update, Michelle coordinated the public process and Range Planning Lead consultants. She has Bachelor of Science degree in Biology and extensive experience in community education and public outreach. RoseAnn Carroll, Office As the DCD financial administrator, RoseAnn is also a Certified Permit CoordinatorTechnician. There are numerous project partners committed to participation, plus additional commitments pending: Project Partners Jefferson County Department of Community Development Zoe Ann Lamp Associate Planner and Development Review Division Lead; AICP Donna Frostholm Associate Planner/Wetland Scientist - has extensive wetland experience in the field, including project review and ordinance development. Michelle Farfan Associate Planner – has over 23 years experience with DCD Colleen Zmolek Assistant Planner – has provided Planner of the Day services to public since 2008 David Wayne Johnson Associate Planner – has over 6 years experience with DCD Lisa Keller Permit Technician – has provided permit application assistance services to public since 2005 Jefferson County Central Services Doug Noltemeier Senior GIS Professional - current GIS lead and a geographer with 17 years experience in GIS, both in the public and private sector. Jefferson County Department of Public Health Tami Pokorny Environmental Health Specialist - representative to the WRIA 20 and WRIA 16 watershed planning processes, the North Pacific Coast Lead Entity and the North Pacific Coast Marine Resources Committee. She administers the Conservation Futures Program and conducts riparian restoration projects. Jefferson County Department of Public Works Frank Gifford Director Monte Reinders County Engineer Jim Pearson Development Review Jefferson County Noxious Weed Control Board Eve Dixon Coordinator - manages the County weed program. WSU Jefferson County Extension Pat Pearson Water Quality/Natural Resources – administrative lead for LID, Water/Beach Watchers, ShoreSteward programs and Jefferson County Marine Resources Committee Jefferson County Master Gardeners Other Agencies and Organizations John Cambalik, Ecosystem Recovery Coordinator for Puget Sound Partnership Jeffree Stewart, Shoreline WA Department of Ecology (Ecology) Specialist Jill Silver 10,000 Years Institute Page 4 of 18 EPA Puget Sound Watershed Management Assistance Grant Jefferson County Watershed Stewardship Resource Center – WORK PLAN Eric Kingfisher Jefferson Land Trust Joe Holtrop, Gary Clallam County Conservation District Dougherty Clallam County DCD staff City of Sequim - Carrie Blake Park Clallam County Master Gardeners Contractors and Consultants TBDSocial marketing & analysis TBDWatershedservices TBDDemonstration garden - DCD TBDDemonstration garden - Sequim TBDCoachingteam TBDClallam video TBDLand use planner/code writer TBDLID program - WSU TBDLIDengineer Programmatic Capability/Technical Experience: The County Department of Community Development (DCD) is managing or participating in numerous concurrent planning processes and local infrastructure improvements – including the SMP update, the recently-adopted CAO, the WRIA 16 and 17 watershed planning process and instream flow adoption, flood hazard prevention ordinance development with FEMA and NOAA, and county sewer and water system improvements. The County is also the first jurisdiction in the state to take the lead role in facilitating Bald Eagle Plans for WA Department of Fish & Wildlife. Local state and county, tribal, academic, and non-profit partners bring extensive policy, scientific, and environmental expertise to the DCD and Center project. Environmental Results Past Performance: 1.2005 – 2009 Ecology grant for Shoreline Master Program (SMP) Comprehensive Update to the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and Unified Development Code: An early adopter, SMP Update is under final State review. Total grant awarded to Jefferson County was $670,000, plus additional JC match. 2.2008 – 2009 Ecology Flood Control Assistance Account Program (FCAAP) grant to create Comprehensive Flood Hazard Management Plans for the Dosewallips and Duckabush Rivers. The BOCC authorized DCD to prepare for their adoption flood plans for hazard mitigation and assistance on the Dosewallips and Duckabush River systems in WRIA 16, and these have been updated. The BOCC will utilize these plans in prioritizing funding and project rankings as project needs are identified. 3.2006 WA Department of Community, Trade and Economic Development (no Commerce) Emerging Issues grant to provide for increased public participation in the SMP Update including a three-day charrette primer. Deliverables included team notes, charrette plan and schedule, and meeting notes. Elected officials were provided status briefings and the information is posted on our website. Progress was reported to CTED at mid and final stages. Page 5 of 18 EPA Puget Sound Watershed Management Assistance Grant Jefferson County Watershed Stewardship Resource Center – WORK PLAN 4.2004 – 2008 Critical Areas Ordinance update – The update process included extensive public involvement and status briefings to the Board of County Commissioners over a four year period, and resulted in 2008 adoption of more protective standards based on local and regional Best Available Science for shorelines, streams, wetlands, and channel migration zones. 5.2007 Ecology grant proposal for low impact development demonstration garden; not funded. 6.2006 Governor’s Smart Growth Award for Outstanding Achievement in Creating Livable & Vibrant Communities for supporting agriculture while protecting fish and wildlife habitat. Partnering: A team of resource and educational agencies, land use and habitat consultants, and non-profits will participate in site and permit review – and includes participation of WSU, JC Department of Environmental Health (JC-EH), and Jefferson Land Trust. WSU will be the lead on LID technical assistance. JC-EH will provide on-site septic technical assistance, professional designers, installers, and O&M specialists, homeowner on-site inspection program, and incentives to property owners for monitoring older septic systems. Jefferson Land Trust and the Conservation Futures Fund will be integral to identifying conservation options. Clallam County Conservation District will act as partner on the development of the Sequim demonstration garden. Sources of educational materials to be provided at the Center include the US Fish and Wildlife Service, US EPA, State Departments of Ecology, Fish and Wildlife and Natural Resources, WSU and Master Gardeners, University of Washington Sea Grant Program, the Puget Sound Partnership and Straits and Hood Canal Ecosystem Recovery Workgroups, and many others. We will also work with the Hood Canal and Strait of Juan de Fuca Action Areas’ Education, Communication and Outreach Network (ECO Net) organizations, the two local networks of educators organized by the Puget Sound Partnership for these Action Areas, to advertise and promote use of the Center. Ü»½®·°¬·±²±º¬¸»É¿¬»®¸»¼ Northwest Puget Sound and Eastern Strait of Juan de Fuca Watershed Name: 233 square miles - 148,925 acres Size: 238 miles of Type S freshwater rivers and streams 250 miles of marine shoreline 6,200 parcels intersecting shorelines WRIAs 16, 17; HUC 17110018 Location: Jefferson County - Rural Residential & Forestlands 6th Congressional District 2 Northwest Puget Sound, Hood Canal, east Strait of Juan de Fuca (957 mi) Impaired waters: Dosewallips River, Duckabush River and Fulton Creek (WRIA 16); Chimacum Page 6 of 18 EPA Puget Sound Watershed Management Assistance Grant Jefferson County Watershed Stewardship Resource Center – WORK PLAN Creek, Mats Mats Bay Creek, Tarboo Creek, Howe Creek, Ripley Creek, Donovan Creek, Leland Creek, Little Quilcene River, Big Quilcene River, Marple Creek and Hood Canal (WRIA 17). Watershed Characterization: Jefferson County is a rural county extending from the Puget Sound and Hood Canal to the Pacific Ocean in Washington State. It faces continued development pressure and contains some of the least developed shorelines and watersheds, contributing critical resources and ecosystem services to the entire Puget Sound Region. Northeast Jefferson and Clallam counties’ 400 miles of shoreline along northwest Puget Sound and the eastern Strait of Juan de Fuca (SJF) support high value aquatic resources shared throughout the Puget Sound Region. The project area encompasses two Water Resources Inventory Areas (WRIAs) with the highest rates of rural residential development in east Jefferson County: WRIA 16 (Skokomish-Dosewallips) which drains to Hood Canal, and WRIA 17 (Quilcene-Snow) which drains to Hood Canal, the Strait of Juan de Fuca, and Admiralty Inlet in Puget Sound. These watersheds are characterized by lowland and shoreline residential developments, commercial village centers around unincorporated population areas, rural and commercial forest lands, Master Planned Resort (MPR) communities, mineral resource areas, and agricultural lands. About 96% of the estimated 2009 county population of 29,000 resides in eastern Jefferson 1 County along the vulnerable waters of the Hood Canal and the Strait of Juan de Fuca. Glaciers shaped the local landscape thousands of years ago, leaving behind layers of glacial and outwash sediments with little exposed bedrock. Forests of western red cedar, Douglas-fir, western hemlock and numerous deciduous species blanket much of the eastern slopes of Jefferson County. The marine shoreline is largely characterized by steep bluffs carved out of the glacial sediments, often topped by stands of Douglas-fir and western hemlock. Unstable and prone to erosion and landslides, many of these bluffs border gravel and cobble beaches. As they erode, they contribute fine sediments and woody debris which are carried by the prevailing waves and currents to form estuaries, beaches, and spits. Major estuaries in eastern Jefferson County occur at Chimacum Creek, Shine, Mats Mats Bay, Thorndyke Bay, Duckabush and Dosewallips River deltas, Quilcene Bay, Tarboo Creek delta at Dabob Bay, Port Ludlow, and Discovery Bay. These areas serve as nurseries for a wide variety of aquatic species and provide critical ecological functions and biological resources including vital rearing habitat, flood attenuation, nutrient retention and cycling, erosion/shoreline protection, food web support, and habitat structure and connectivity. Jefferson County’s beaches also provide important habitat for forage fish such as sand lance and surf smelt. The intertidal areas along the marine shore support extensive eelgrass beds and kelp forests providing habitat for numerous species, including herring, salmon, Dungeness crab, and marine birds. The Big Quilcene River, Little Quilcene River, Dosewallips River, Snow Creek, Salmon Creek and Chimacum Creek drain the east slopes of the Olympic Mountains into Puget Sound, Hood Canal, and Strait of Juan de Fuca, providing important spawning and rearing habitat for many species including threatened stocks of Puget Sound Chinook, steelhead, bull trout, and Hood Canal summer chum. These cool rain-fed rivers are characterized by steep gradients, wide 1 Office of Financial Management Page 7 of 18 EPA Puget Sound Watershed Management Assistance Grant Jefferson County Watershed Stewardship Resource Center – WORK PLAN alluvial floodplains and channel migration zones, and limited aquifer recharge capacity. Critical habitat for Chinook and bull trout also includes the marine shorelines of Hood Canal and the Strait of Juan de Fuca (ESA Adolfson, 2008a). Jefferson County is the third largest shellfish producing county in the state and has two of the largest shellfish hatcheries in the United States. Commercial aquaculture farms take advantage of relatively clean and productive waters, cobble and sand beaches, and mudflats in Hood Canal, Discovery Bay, Oak Bay, Quilcene Bay, Port Townsend Bay, and Dabob Bay to grow hardshell clams (butter clams, native littleneck, manila clams, cockles, and horse clams), geoduck, oysters (Olympia oysters and non-native Pacific oysters), shrimp, and crab. Tribal subsistence and commercial use of these beaches is widely distributed throughout the east County. Extensive inventory and characterization work during the 2004-2008 Shoreline Master Program (SMP) update by local and tribal professionals and ESA Adolfson concludes that Jefferson County’s shorelines remain relatively healthy compared to more developed areas of the Puget Sound basin in terms of contaminated sediments, water quality indicators, shoreline armoring, percent of impervious surface, and status of aquatic species. Only about 10 percent of the marine shoreline in east Jefferson County is armored with a bulkhead and visual estimates of oblique aerial photographs (taken in 2006) suggest that most of the major feeder bluffs are unarmored. Docks, piers and beach stairs mostly occur intermittently (roughly 2.7 structures per marine shoreline mile) but there are pockets of heavily modified shore. Most of the bays and shellfish beds remain open to harvest, as water quality is generally good. Impervious surface ranges from 2.8 to 11% in developing sub-basins within WRIAs 16 and 17. Nearly all of the land abutting the east County’s marine and riverine shorelines is platted and designated for rural residential use. Portions of the Chimacum, lower Little Quilcene, middle Big Quilcene, Snow and Salmon Creek basins also support commercial and rural forestry and agricultural uses. Since 1980, the rate of population growth has generally exceeded that of Washington State. Permit applications have slowed during recent economic downturn, but development along shorelines is still dominant. The number of permits (largely in east Jefferson County) processed by the Department of Community Development (DCD) from 2001 through 2008 were: îððï îððî îððí îððì îððë îððê îððé îððè Þ«·´¼·²¹ Ð»®³·¬ ×«»¼ éïë éíí éèè éëê ééê éïé êìì ëðè ×²°»½¬·±² Ð»®º±®³»¼ îçéé íïéë íêèê ìéïï ìèìè êíëé êêðð ëèçè Í»°¬·½ Ð»®³·¬ ×«»¼ íîé íéî íîé îçç íèì ìéé íçè îìì Í¸±®»´·²» Ð»®³·¬ ß°°®±ª¿´ é ïï ì ïî é î ïë îð Í¸±®»´·²» Û¨»³°¬·±² ß°°®±ª¿´ íï íç îè íë íè ìë êî êí Environmental Threats and Emerging Problems: Future development in east Jefferson County will likely be concentrated on parcels along fragile marine and riverine shorelines, and up steep valley walls on converted forestlands where sought- after views of the Sound are available. Over 6,200 parcels have been identified within shoreline jurisdiction by the SMP update – 748 lie completely within the shoreline buffer width of 150 feet (ESA Adolfson, 2008a). Small lots along the marine shoreline are the result of platting conducted in the 1930’s intended at the time to support small cottages and provide the most number of parcels a view. According to county assessor’s data approximately 30 percent of all Page 8 of 18 EPA Puget Sound Watershed Management Assistance Grant Jefferson County Watershed Stewardship Resource Center – WORK PLAN of the existing parcels on the marine shoreline in east Jefferson County are vacant (have no structure or improvements). County assessor’s data also indicate that approximately 40 percent of the total river shoreline parcels in east Jefferson County are vacant. Poorly-designed and sited development activities such as clearing, grading, road and utility installation, and building construction result in landslides, erosion, stormwater transport, habitat fragmentation, and loss of native forests, habitat structures and plant communities. While discouraged through ‘highest and best use’ taxation, large parcels (10 – 40 acres) may be completely cleared (except for required buffers) under current code. Loss of Native Vegetation and Shoreline Erosion: The importance of healthy mature native plant community and native soil conservation to healthy shorelines is documented in numerous reports and studies (e.g. Brennan, 2007, Hinman, 2005). Clearing of native vegetation coupled with intense fall and winter precipitation events result in damaging landslides lacking the structural benefits of large woody debris. Staircases and other structures disturb bluff vegetation, leading to slope instability, affecting sediment transport processes and contributing to increased scouring of upper intertidal areas, decreasing habitat functions (ESA Adolfson, 2009). Clearing and grading is often conducted prior to application of a permit. Small wetlands and streams are not accurately mapped, and may not be recognized during clearing as requiring buffers. Water Quality Impacts: Sedimentation and contamination of the east County’s riverine, wetland, estuarine and nearshore environments occurs regularly as a result of upland clearing, stormwater concentration, flooding, and erosion (ESA Adolfson, 2009). Nearshore areas of Jefferson County are susceptible to eutrophication from increased nutrient inputs from stormwater, agricultural and septic non-point sources. Stratification in Hood Canal locally concentrates nutrients, resulting in very low dissolved oxygen (Fagergren et al., 2004), and potentially in concentrations of pollutants and toxins (ESA Adolfson 2009). In addition, most rivers, lakes, and streams in eastern Jefferson 2 County are included on the most recent (2008) state DOE 303(d) list for one or more impaired parameter - temperature, fecal coliform, ph, instream flow, or habitat, including the Dosewallips River, Duckabush River and Fulton Creek in WRIA 16, and Chimacum Creek, Mats Mats Bay, Tarboo Creek, Howe Creek, Ripley Creek, Donovan Creek, Leland Creek, Little Quilcene River, Big Quilcene River, Marple Creek and Hood Canal in WRIA 17. Climate Change and Sea Level Rise: Global climate change has the potential to considerably change shoreline jurisdiction geographic locations over time, as a sea level rise of up to 3 feet will cause a substantial movement of water inland (Casola, J et al. 2005, ESA Adolfson, 2008a). This could cause flooding of beachfront homes, in addition to significantly increasing erosion of feeder bluffs and flooding important estuaries and floodplains. Identifying these areas, and discouraging development through regulation, education, and conservation tools, is an important, but poorly funded component of the County’s SMP. As a partner with the City of Port Townsend in a Climate Change Action Plan, Jefferson County is proactively assessing climate impacts, and will update the County Comprehensive Plan in 2011 to reflect climate-related goals. The County is currently working with FEMA and the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) on an updated Flood Damage 2 See: http://apps.ecy.wa.gov/wats08/QueryResults.aspx . Page 9 of 18 EPA Puget Sound Watershed Management Assistance Grant Jefferson County Watershed Stewardship Resource Center – WORK PLAN Prevention Ordinance, which could include recognition of increased flooding, erosion, and sedimentation impacts related to climate change. Existing watershed plans and efforts to address the problems and threats: Jefferson County has invested significant resources towards adopting policy and regulatory provisions to protect shoreline and watershed functions. Extensive studies have been undertaken in the past decade as part of watershed planning and development of the SMP update and County Comprehensive Plan (CP) which include watershed characterization, cumulative impacts analysis, and restoration plans. As conceptualized in the state Department of Ecology (WDOE) Framework for Watershed Planning (Stanley et. al.), these studies establish the bridge to apply knowledge developed at the watershed scale to specific sites. , Provisions in the December 2009 Locally-Approved SMP and the fully adopted Critical Area Ordinance (CAO) include requirements for increased buffers and setbacks (an increase from 30’ to 150’), native vegetation conservation, restrictions on shoreline armoring and overwater structures, and recommendation for LID BMPs to mitigate stormwater impacts at the site scale. This has been further confirmed by legislative action in EHB 1653 clarifying the relationship between the Shoreline Management Act (SMA) and the Growth Management Act (GMA). In addition, the county was the first in Washington to adopt a stormwater ordinance based on the 2005 WDOE Stormwater Manual (which establishes the minimum requirements for stormwater best management practices (BMPs). Watershed Plans for WRIA 16 and 17 have been adopted, highlighting the necessity of protecting marine and freshwater shoreline functions and contributing processes. With input from the County, WDOE has adopted an instream flow rule for WRIA 17 to support listed fish and address water quantity and quality impacts while still providing for development opportunities. The SMP Restoration Plan (ESA Adolfson, 2008b) prioritizes numerous additional targeted properties based on ecosystem benefits, and the County Conservation Futures Fund (CFF) and other partnering conservation organizations utilize this plan. Conservation partnerships between the County, Washington Department of Natural Resources (DNR), Department of Fish and Wildlife (DFW) and local non-profits Jefferson Land Trust (JLT) and Northwest Watershed Institute (NWI) have resulted in the protection of important floodplain and estuarine properties including the Dabob Bay Natural Resource Conservation Area, and sections of Snow Creek and the Quilcene River. JLT is completing a 100 Year Visioning project that will list priority conservation targets developed with input from the local community. Many incentive-based and grant-funded conservation tools are tools in action here. Conservation easements are generally deemed too expensive to be a viable option for small lots along Puget Sound, but are utilized for large lots. Ð®±¶»½¬Ò»»¼ The Watershed Center supports ongoing County planning and permit programs by providing an innovative coaching model that does not exist in the current permitting structure, and addressing user needs for information and guidance toward a sustainable development and ecosystem/ watershed protection. It will not only help to promote awareness and participation in stewardship of watershed resources, but will also result in facilitating more positive relationships between regulators and citizens, reducing costs for both. Page 10 of 18 EPA Puget Sound Watershed Management Assistance Grant Jefferson County Watershed Stewardship Resource Center – WORK PLAN Drawing from regional and local priorities in the Puget Sound Action Agenda, on November 13, 3 2009, the Strait of Juan de Fuca Ecosystem Recovery Network identified four categories of high priority actions, each with multiple projects that would be most appropriate for this funding opportunity. One of those was the category of Education and Technical Assistance. After numerous subsequent meetings and conversations, this proposal was identified as the one from this category that should be submitted for this RFP from the Strait Action Area and eastern Jefferson County. As a bridge between watershed characterization and resource protection implementation, this proposal supports numerous Action Agenda strategies and actions, and 2011 EPA national goals for Puget Sound at the local watershed scale. Specifically, this proposal will directly support implementation of Near Term Actions B.3 (1) and C.2 (8) and the outreach, education, and technical assistance priority strategies identified in the Strait of Juan de Fuca and Hood Canal Action Area Profiles (see Action Area Priority Strategy E for each of these Action Areas) in eastern Jefferson County. In addition, this proposal will assist the County and its partners in fostering implementation of various land-use regulations and plans, as represented in Near Term Actions A.3 (4), A.4 (3), C.2 (3), C.2(4), and C.1 (7), D.1(1), and E.4(3). Also supported are EPA Region 10’s 2011 Strategic Plan goals to improve and restore water quality on a watershed basis; and facilitate ecosystem-scale protection and restoration under National Goal 2 - Clean and Safe Water, Sub-objective 2.2.1 Protect and Improve Water Quality on a Watershed Basis, and Goal 4 - Healthy Communities and Ecosystems, Sub-objective 4.3.1 Protect and Restore Ecosystems. Planning and regulations by themselves do not provide protection; local jurisdiction capacity and citizen participation is vital. Puget Sound Partnership (PSP) and many others observe that a missing component in ‘saving Puget Sound’ is the lack of individual commitment and ecological ‘literacy’, coupled with insufficient local government capacity. County DCD staff have been reduced, and wetlands, small streams, and floodplains are poorly mapped – while the need to provide resource protection is growing. There is a disconnect between 1) what is understood through watershed planning to be necessary to protect and support people and thriving ecosystems, and 2) what some members of the public interpret as reasonable and acceptable. Response to the adoption of protective policies has revealed that many residents do not recognize the ecosystem services provided by our natural resources or feel the threats are minimal to nonexistent. Some perceive the local regulatory process as burdensome and difficult to understand and indicate disbelief that individual actions might pose a threat to our shared environment. It is critical to connect people to the findings of the watershed and shorelines planning processes through the understanding and promotion of sustainable land development practices. The creative interactive model represented by this proposal does not exist in any county in Washington State – making this Center an important pilot project to evaluate the effectiveness of interacting with the user public at the permitting nexus. A feasibility study for the Center was conducted in 2007 by a local non-profit, 10,000 Years Institute. In order to establish firm support for the Center, critical and expert partners were consulted with in order to articulate the scope of the proposal, including the Board of County 3 Strait of Juan de Fuca Ecosystem Recovery Network (Strait ERN) - Local integrating organization for the Strait of Juan de Fuca Action Area working to implement and foster implementation of the Action Agenda; Includes leaders from tribal and local governments, agencies, non-profit organizations, educational institutions, and key businesses and business groups from Clallam and Jefferson as well as the Hood Canal Coordinating Council. Page 11 of 18 EPA Puget Sound Watershed Management Assistance Grant Jefferson County Watershed Stewardship Resource Center – WORK PLAN Commissioners, the DCD, Washington State University (WSU), the development community (realtors, architects, the Homebuilder’s Association), Jefferson Land Trust, and ordinary citizens. Responses were overwhelmingly positive. Ð®±¶»½¬Ð´¿² In addition to developing and operating the WSRC, we will implement a comprehensive social marketing program to change development practices. The program includes “upstream” policy analysis and potential changes to ensure that there is consistency and support in local regulation for ecologically sustainable practices. It also includes development of a marketing strategy to raise public awareness and support for the protection of ecosystem services. Finally, it will use an innovative program to remove barriers and provide support for actual implementation of sustainable practices. The project builds upon the characterization planning and regulatory work already accomplished to ensure that recommended and recognized best management practices are actually implemented at the individual site level. Element A – The Watershed Stewardship Resource Center The Watershed Resource is envisioned as the ‘go-to’ place for information about land-use and environmental regulations, watershed ecosystem education, and sustainable development practices. Potential buyers and permit applicants will be greeted warmly, invited to sit down with a trained staff member and walked through a basic analysis of their site. The presence of shorelines, wetlands and other natural resources will be respectfully recognized as important amenities worthy of protection – noting their services to the greater PS, HC, and SJF ecosystems, the local watershed, and the specific property The Center will employ multiple modalities to productively engage with property owners, including a GIS station where staff can help them view maps, plans and aerial photos. Up-to- date and branded materials that are consistent with JC regulations and environment will be provided. A non-technical, easy-to-understand guidance handbook on the CAO and SMP will be developed and will feature other Jefferson County residents who have chosen to implement sustainable practices and conserve resources on their property. Visitors will be invited to view a video and visit the demonstration garden to viscerally experience the appeal of rain gardens, xeriscaping, alternative pavements, and other low impact development features. Most importantly, property owners will be directed to the Watershed Center before submitting any development applications at the permit center should they seek information about ‘how to’ develop their property. Property owners will then have the opportunity to work with experienced staff to learn about their property and sustainable practices before investing time, money and energy into development plans. It is at this critical juncture that the target audience has the highest potential to initiate behavior change. The Center will also help link the customers to other organizations providing assistance or services, including federal and state resource agencies, WSU Cooperative Extension, Jefferson Conservation District, and Jefferson Land Trust. The Center will provide a point-of-contact to exercise incentive-based conservation options with JLT and the CFF, utilizing the SMP plans. We will also coordinate with the proposed projects for the Clean Water District Activities and the Enhanced Shoreline Protection efforts to measure No Net Loss in Jefferson County, provided Page 12 of 18 EPA Puget Sound Watershed Management Assistance Grant Jefferson County Watershed Stewardship Resource Center – WORK PLAN these projects are funded. Thus, the applicant will be supported by a team of local experts coordinated by their coach at the Center, under the management of DCD. The Center will practice a coaching model of customer service where staff will actively seek to support the landowner in implementing low impact and best management practices. Staff will be trained to highlight the cost of competing behaviors and to bring the real benefits of recommended practices into the present. The goal will be to have the landowner experience the design process as educational, meaningful, and even fun. Applicants will then be supported in their choice to protect natural resources and implement sustainable practices. Tasks Include: A.1 Renovate space, buy computers, install materials A.2 Train staff A.3 Install demonstration garden A.4 Provide services A.5 Presentations A.6 Evaluation Element B – Upstream Policy and Process Analysis Jefferson County’s policies and code have been adopted over time, and like most local jurisdictions’ present a rather convoluted path towards simple compliance, let alone proactive protection of the environment. This element will serve as a starting point for the entire project, evaluating current adopted policy, code and processes from the ‘customers’’ or applicants’ point of view with an objective of making environmentally practices easy to adopt. Jefferson County staff, previous permit applicants, realtors, development professionals and contractors will be consulted via focus groups and roundtable discussions to gain an understanding of their experiences of the permit process. These stakeholder meetings will be designed to reveal those points which promote actual implementation of environmental protective practices and those which inhibit such implementation. This analysis will be framed using a social marketing model to identify both benefits and barriers to implementing protective practices. In particular the behavior changes that this analysis will seek to influence include increased use of low-impact development practices, decreased clearing and grubbing of developed parcels, increased preservation of native vegetation, alternatives to shoreline hard armoring, and increased compliance with and appreciation for critical area and shoreline buffers. A work group of stakeholder representatives will be convened to make recommendations for changes to policy, code and process. Overall, this element will seek to create an easy-to-follow path toward implementation of environmentally protective measures. This element will be facilitated and documented by a skilled consultant with expertise in both social marketing and land use issues. Tasks Include: B.1 Stakeholder Focus Groups B.2 Work Group B.3 Recommendations Page 13 of 18 EPA Puget Sound Watershed Management Assistance Grant Jefferson County Watershed Stewardship Resource Center – WORK PLAN Element C – Develop Social Marketing Program The marketing plan will build upon the analysis of Element B and create a marketing mix designed to orient people to the Watershed Resource Center and the services offered there. The overall goal of the strategy is to create a clear and satisfying path to the implementation of environmentally protective practices. The plan will include a situation analysis, target market profiles and development of marketing objectives and goals. Market research will be conducted to understand market barriers, benefits and competition for protecting ecosystem services. Finally a marketing mix will be developed and an evaluation plan developed. It is also expected that information gained from the development of this social marketing plan will be used to complement development and evolution of the Watershed Center. It is also expected that the marketing plan will identify incentives to encourage watershed protection, restoration, and pollutant source reduction. The plan will be developed by a skilled consultant with appropriate expertise, as directed by DCD. Tasks Include: C.1 Formative and marketing research C.2 Identify marketing objectives C.3 Complete Plan C.4 Implement Plan C.5 Evaluation Element D – Development of Educational and Guidance Materials This element will create a full suite of educational and guidance materials for use in the Watershed Center. The first step of this element will be to survey the multitude of materials already available in the public domain and seek appropriate permission to use or modify them for local use. We will seek to avoid redundancy and maximize cost effectiveness by using currently available resources. We do anticipate the need to create new resources particularly aimed at our local audience. These resources include: LID and Small Projects Guidance Manual – Drawing on a prototype developed in Clallam County, this manual will provide technical guidance for implementing LID practices for residential projects. The manual will provide an overview of acceptable best management practices as well as provide design parameters that will serve to encourage the use of LID where engineered plans are not required and provide technical guidance to design professionals. GIS analysis will be conducted to develop zones for Jefferson County use. “Neighbor to Neighbor” Video and DVD – A short video will be produced featuring local residents who have implemented shoreline and habitat protection or restoration projects in Jefferson and Clallam counties. Development Review Flowchart – This flowchart will use the recommendations developed in Element B, and will show the incentives to incorporating LID, alternatives to shoreline hard armoring, and habitat protection measures into development plans. The intent is to demonstrate how good site design and use of best management practices can help to make the permitting process easier and faster. Page 14 of 18 EPA Puget Sound Watershed Management Assistance Grant Jefferson County Watershed Stewardship Resource Center – WORK PLAN CAO and SMP Guidance – This easy-to-read booklet will serve as an educational and inspirational message about the benefits of protecting shorelines and other protected habitat. The document will also feature other Jefferson County residents speaking ‘neighbor to neighbor’ about why and how they chose to protect their shorelines and habitat. Tasks Include: D.1 Survey existing materials & identify gaps D.2 Create branded print materials D.3 LID Guidance Manual D.4 Neighbor to Neighbor video D.5 Development Review Flow Chart D.6 CAO & SMP guidance Element E – LID, Stormwater, and Buffer Management Workshops Train the Trainer Program – Recognized leaders in the local development community will be recruited to attend LID workshops at the LID Demonstration Project in Puyallup, WA with Dr. Curtis Hinman. The workshops will seek to increase the knowledge and professional capacity of our community so that desired practices can be readily specified, reviewed and implemented. Fifteen ‘peer leaders’ will be recruited and subsidized to attend the training. These peer leaders will help develop and host local workshops for other members of the construction and landscape industry. The peer leaders and participants of local workshops will be included on a list of trained providers to be available at the Center. Local low-impact development workshops – A series of workshops will be hosted by WSU and the peer leaders with the goal of training 100 citizen volunteers in LID practices. The citizens will be available to assist property owners wishing to implement such practices. LID and alternative shoreline armoring demonstration sites at visible public locations - These demonstration sites, complete with xeriscaping, rain gardens, alternative pavements, and water-reuse and rainwater collection systems will be located to provide cross-pollination across geographies in Clallam County and southeast Jefferson County, and will serve as marketing for LID practices and the WRC. Clallam County and WSU will be partners. Buffer Vegetation Management Workshops – a series of workshops will be co-hosted by WSU and the Jefferson Noxious Weed Control Board. The workshops will teach citizens to enhance buffer functionality while allowing them uses and views – and to identify noxious weeds and proper and safe techniques for their removal with the goal of reducing pesticides. Tasks Include: E.1 Recruit peer leaders E.2 Train the trainers workshops in Puyallup E.3 Local LID workshops E.4 Develop demonstration sites E.5 Buffer management workshops E.6 Evaluation Page 15 of 18 EPA Puget Sound Watershed Management Assistance Grant Jefferson County Watershed Stewardship Resource Center – WORK PLAN Element F – Prepare Additional Local Ordinances There exists an additional need to update local ordinances despite the considerable progress made to adopt protective policies. This element will include convening a stakeholder group to develop the inclusion of low impact development BMPs into the current stormwater ordinance as well as a vegetation and buffer management ordinance to include sustainable tree and shrub management and noxious weed control BMPs. County staff will participate, and the meetings will be facilitated by a trained professional. In addition, data and information will be provided to County Commissioners and other decision-makers to assist them in understanding the need for and goals of the ordinances. Tasks Include: F.1 Stakeholder group F.2 Draft ordinances F.3 Technical support to elected officials F.4 Adoption Ó±²·¬±®·²¹¿²¼Ó»¿«®·²¹ Internal audits will be conducted and reported at the end of each year in order to track and report the rate of use by different demographics in the County, and the outcome of that use. Metrics to be used include: 1) the number of buffer enhancement projects, 2) conservation easements, 3) LID and alternative shoreline armoring projects, 4) requests for variances and conditional use permits, 5) reduction in clearing and grading complaints, 6) attendance at workshops, and 7) the number of successful partnering organization projects. A sub-sample of permits that used the Center will receive a site visit to evaluate construction of the approved site plan and plan effectiveness. The upstream analysis process will provide stakeholder review and input into the utility and benefits of the Center’s program and services. The internal audits and site visits will also be coordinated with the assessment and monitoring work that will be conducted by the proposed Enhanced Shoreline Protection project for measuring No Net Loss in Jefferson County, and the proposed Clean Water District Activities in Jefferson and Clallam Counties. Project Reporting As per grant requirements, semi-annual and annual project reports will be prepared and submitted to track progress and describe accomplishments/challenges. Page 16 of 18 EPA Puget Sound Watershed Management Assistance Grant Jefferson County Watershed Stewardship Resource Center – WORK PLAN Ð®±¶»½¬Ì·³»´·²»¿²¼Ý±³°±²»²¬ Project Components – Tasks and Timeline: ß½¬·ª·¬§Ç»¿®ïÇ»¿®îÇ»¿®í ÏïÏîÏíÏìÏïÏîÏíÏìÏïÏîÏíÏì Û´»³»²¬ßÉ¿¬»®¸»¼Ý»²¬»® ßòïÎ»²±ª¿¬»°¿½»ô¾«§½±³°«¬»®ô·²¬¿´´ ¨ ³¿¬»®·¿´ ßòîÌ®¿·²¬¿ºº¨ ßòí×²¬¿´´¼»³±²¬®¿¬·±²¹¿®¼»²¨¨ ßòìÐ®±ª·¼»»®ª·½»¨¨¨¨¨¨¨¨¨¨¨ ßòëÐ®»»²¬¿¬·±²¨¨¨ ßòêÛª¿´«¿¬·±²¨¨¨ Û´»³»²¬ÞË°¬®»¿³Ð±´·½§úÐ®±½»ß²¿´§· ÞòïÍ¬¿µ»¸±´¼»®Ú±½«Ù®±«°¨ ÞòîÉ±®µÙ®±«°¨¨ ÞòíÎ»½±³³»²¼¿¬·±²¨ Û´»³»²¬ÝÍ±½·¿´Ó¿®µ»¬·²¹Ð®±¹®¿³ ÝòïÚ±®³¿¬·ª»¿²¼³¿®µ»¬·²¹®»»¿®½¸¨ Ýòî×¼»²¬·º§³¿®µ»¬·²¹±¾¶»½¬·ª»¨ ÝòíÝ±³°´»¬»Ð´¿²¨ Ýòì×³°´»³»²¬Ð´¿²¨¨¨¨¨¨¨¨ ÝòëÛª¿´«¿¬·±²¨¨ Û´»³»²¬ÜÜ»ª»´±°Û¼«½¿¬·±²¿´ñÑ«¬®»¿½¸Ó¿¬»®·¿´ ÜòïÍ«®ª»§»¨·¬·²¹³¿¬»®·¿´ú·¼»²¬·º§¹¿°¨ ÜòîÝ®»¿¬»¾®¿²¼»¼°®·²¬³¿¬»®·¿´¨ ÜòíÔ×ÜÙ«·¼¿²½»Ó¿²«¿´¨¨ ÜòìÒ»·¹¸¾±®¬±Ò»·¹¸¾±®ª·¼»±¨¨ ÜòëÜ»ª»´±°³»²¬Î»ª·»©Ú´±©Ý¸¿®¬¨¨ ÜòêÝßÑúÍÓÐ¹«·¼¿²½»¨¨ Û´»³»²¬ÛÔ×ÜúÊ»¹»¬¿¬·±²É±®µ¸±° ÛòïÎ»½®«·¬°»»®´»¿¼»®¨ ÛòîÌ®¿·²¬¸»¬®¿·²»®©±®µ¸±°·²Ð«§¿´´«°¨ ÛòíÔ±½¿´Ô×Ü©±®µ¸±°¨¨¨¨ ÛòìÜ»ª»´±°¼»³±²¬®¿¬·±²·¬»¨ ÛòëÞ«ºº»®³¿²¿¹»³»²¬©±®µ¸±°¨¨¨ ÛòêÛª¿´«¿¬·±²¨¨ Û´»³»²¬ÚÔ±½¿´Ñ®¼·²¿²½» ÚòïÍ¬¿µ»¸±´¼»®¹®±«°¨¨ ÚòîÜ®¿º¬±®¼·²¿²½»¨ ÚòíÌ»½¸²·½¿´«°°±®¬¬±»´»½¬»¼±ºº·½·¿´¨ Úòìß¼±°¬·±²¨ Ð®±¶»½¬Î»°±®¬·²¹ Í»³·¿²²«¿´Î»°±®¬¨¨¨¨¨ ß²²«¿´Î»°±®¬¨¨ Page 17 of 18 EPA Puget Sound Watershed Management Assistance Grant Jefferson County Watershed Stewardship Resource Center – WORK PLAN ß²¬·½·°¿¬»¼Ñ«¬½±³» See attached Logic Model. Peer Outreach and Information Transfer: A larger information transfer will occur by creating a model with curriculum and experience to be made available to other counties such as Clallam, Mason, and Kitsap and associated cities. In addition, local and regional decision-makers can learn from the County as we share experiences and performance data gathered in our audits at appropriate watershed planning and science symposiums including the biennial Puget Sound Georgia Basin Science conference and Society for Ecological Restoration annual conference. Presentations will also be scheduled for neighboring counties, American Planning Association WA Chapter, WA State Association of Counties, and other local government and professional meetings. Page 18 of 18 Ü»¬¿·´»¼Ò¿®®¿¬·ª»Þ«¼¹»¬ Î¿¬»Ø±«®Ì±¬¿´Ú»¼»®¿´Ó¿¬½¸ »´»³»²¬ Ð»®±²²»´Ö»ºº»®±²Ý±«²¬§ ßñÞñÝñÜñÛñÚÜ·®»½¬±®íèòèêïïîíìíôêìðïôìëëìîôïèëìíôêìð ßñÞñÝñÜñÛñÚÐ´¿²²·²¹Ó¿²¿¹»ííòðèïïîííéôïìçíéôïìçíéôïìç ® ßÐ´¿²²»®îëòìíìêèðïïçôðïîîîôêïîçêôìððïïçôðïî ßñÞñÝñÜñÛñÚÐ®±¶»½¬Ó¹îëòìíîëðìêíôêééëìôðééçôêððêíôêéé ® ÜÖ»ºº»®±²Ù×ÍÍ°»½·¿´·¬îëòìíëðïôîéîïôîéîïôîéî ßñÛÒ±¨·±«É»»¼Í¬¿ººïìòððìëðêôíððêôíððêôíðð ßñÞñÝñÜñÛñÚÚ·½¿´Ì»½¸îðòððïïîíîîôìêðîîôìêðîîôìêð ßß¼³·²øÎ»½»°¬·±²÷ïîòððìêèðëêôïêðëêôïêðëêôïêð ð íìçôêêçîðïôìèìïìèôïèëíìçôêêç Ú®·²¹»øíîòëû÷ ßñÞñÝñÜñÛñÚ×²«®¿²½»ô®»¬·®»³»²¬ô¿²²«¿´´»¿ª»ô°¿§®±´´¬¿¨»ïïíôêìíèîôíïííïôííðïïíôêìí Ì®¿ª»´Ó·´» ßìÝ»²¬»®°®»»²¬¿¬·±²¬±°®±º»·±²¿´¿²¼´±½¿´ðòëîìððïôîððïôîðððïôîðð ÛÔ×Ü©±®µ¸±°¿¬¬»²¼¿²½ðòëíëçéïôéçèïôéçèðïôéçè » îôççèîôççèðîôççè Û¯«·°³»²¬ Í«°°´·» ßÑºº·½»Í«°°´·»îôîéðîôîéðîôîéð ßÙ×Í¬¿¬·±²ú±º¬©¿®»ø¸¿®¼©¿®»ô¼»µô±º¬©¿®»ô°´±¬¬»®ñ¼·¹·¬·¦»®÷ìôççíìôççíìôççí éôîêíìôççí Ý±²¬®¿½¬«¿´ ßÉ¿¬»®¸»¼Ý»²¬»®Ü»³±²¬®¿¬·±²Ù¿®¼»²»»¼»¬¿·´éíôììéêêôçìéêôëððéíôììé ßôÞôÝôÚÝ±²«´¬¿²¬Í±½·¿´Ó¿®µ»¬·²¹¿²¼ß²¿´§·éìòëìëðííôëîëííôëîëðííôëîë ßôÜôÛÝ±²«´¬¿²¬É¿¬»®¸»¼Í»®ª·½»éìòëîêèïçôçêêéôçêêïîôðððïçôçêê ßÝ±¿½¸·²¹Ì»¿³ß¹»²½§¿²¼Ý±²«´¬¿²¬éðíîðîîôìðððîîôìððîîôìðð ÜñÛÝ´¿´´¿³Ý±¿²¼ÉÍËÊ·¼»éìòëïððéôìëðíôîëðìôîððéôìëð ± îðèíð Ûïêôêðððïêôêððïêôêðð Ô×ÜÐ®±¹®¿³ÉÍË´¿¾±® Ûðòëïèððçðððçððçðð Ô×ÜÐ®±¹®¿³ÉÍË³·´»¿¹» Ûíëôëððîëôðððïðôëððíëôëðð Ô×ÜÐ®±¹®¿³ÉÍË¼»³±²¬®¿¬·±²¹¿®¼»² ÜÝ±²«´¬¿²¬Ô×ÜÛ²¹·²»»®·²¹éìòëïíëïðôðëèïðôðëèðïðôðëè ÛÝ´¿´´¿³Ý±«²¬§Í»¯«·³Ô×ÜÙ¿®¼»²»»¼»¬¿·´íìôðððîìôðððïðôðððíìôððð ð îëíôèìêïéðôéìêèíôïððîëíôèìê Ñ¬¸»® ßÐ®±ª·¼»ÉÍÎÝ°¿½»îôððððîôðððîôððð »»¼»¬¿·´ ×²¼·®»½¬ ßñÞñÝñÜñÛñÚÖ»ºº»®±²Ý±«²¬§îðòíéûéïôîîèéïôîîèéïôîîè ÌÑÌßèððôêìê ëííôéêïîêêôèèëèððôêìê Ô Ü»¬¿·´æÝ»²¬»®Ô×ÜÜ»³±²¬®¿¬·±²Ð¿®µÞ«¼¹»¬ Ù®»»²Î±±ºüëðð·²¬¿´´¿¬·±²·²½´«¼»¼ Î¿·²Þ¿®®»´ìüîëð Ó«´½¸Þ·²íüëð Ù«¬¬»®üëð ×²º·´¬®¿¬·±²Ì®»²½¸»üìôððð·²¬¿´´¿¬·±²·²½´«¼»¼ Ü·¿³±²¼Ð·»®ìüîðð¼»´·ª»®§·²½´«¼»¼ Ð»®³»¿¾´»Ð¿ª»³»²¬üìôððð·²¬¿´´¿¬·±²·²½´«¼»¼ Ì±°Í±·´îêî§¿®¼üíôïðð¬¿¨·²½´«¼»¼ Ó«´½¸ïëð§¿®¼üîôéðð¬¿¨·²½´«¼»¼ Ý±³°±¬ïìé§¿®¼üïôíìé¬¿¨·²½´«¼»¼ Í±·´ß³»²¼³»²¬üîðð Ó§½»´·«³Ì®»¿¬³»²¬Í¬±®³©¿¬»®Ú¿½·´·¬üêôððð § Ð®»´·³·²¿®§Ü»·¹²üïôéëð Ú·²¿´Ü»·¹²üîôéëð Î±¬±¬·´´·²¹ôÝ±²¬®«½¬·±²ôÔ¿¾±®üèôèðð Í±·´ß²¿´§·üîëð Ð´¿²¬üïèôððð·²¬¿´´¿¬·±²·²½´«¼»¼ Ý±²¬®¿½¬±®Ú»»üïçôëðð ÌÑÌßüéíôììé Ô Ü»¬¿·´æÍ»¯«·³Ü»³±²¬®¿¬·±²Ð¿®µÞ«¼¹»¬ Ð¿¬¸©¿§èðð´·²»¿®º»»¬ Ý±²¬®«½¬·±²ô·²¬¿´´¿¬·±²¿²¼³¿¬»®·¿´üîíôððð Û²¹·²»»®·²¹ñ¼»·¹²©±®µüîôëðð ß¼³·²·¬®¿¬·ª»üïôððð Í«¾¬±¬¿´æüîêôëðð Î¿·²Ù¿®¼»²øî÷ Û²¹·²»»®·²¹ñ¼»·¹²©±®µüéëð ×²¬¿´´¿¬·±²ñ½±²¬®«½¬·±²üíôððð Í«¾¬±¬¿´æüíôéëð Û½±Ì«®ºüëðð Ñ«¬®»¿½¸¿²¼»¼«½¿¬·±² ×²¬»®°®»¬·ª»·¹²øë÷üïôîëð É±®µ¸±°¿²¼¬±«®üîôððð Í«¾¬±¬¿´æüíôéëð ÌÑÌßÔüíìôððð Ü»¬¿·´æÐ®±ª·¼»ÉÍÎÝ°¿½» Î»²¬úË¬·´·¬·» Ý±¬æîíê¯òº¬òàüïîòèëñ¯òº¬ãüíôðíîñ§®º±®í§»¿®ãüçôðç ê îîû±ºÝ±¬îôððð ÌÑÌßüîôððð Ô Æ`Ã/3,34