HomeMy WebLinkAboutBLD2003-00514 Wetland Delination WESTECI[ COMPANY
Environmental Consulting-Site Permitting
WETLAND DELINEATION REPORT:
• LOT 5, PARCEL 1 602-353-023
BRINNON, WASHINGTON
G. Bradford Shea, Ph.D.
December 2002
Submitted to:
JEFFERSON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
621 Sheridan Street
Port Townsend, Washington 98368
Submitted by:
WESTECH COMPANY . _. _
Box 2876 6 j : , ' 7 ra
Port Angeles, Washington 98362 ; _
1111
I 3 MAR —7 Ne4
__.
L_,...°r
�i`=G
WT813BRY.REP/t 12602gbs
P.O.Box 2876•Port Angeles,Washington 98362•Telephone:(360)452.0186•Fan(360)4824118
eats bahea@tertforwartLeom
CONTENTS
1.0 INTRODUCTION 1
2.0 METHODS 2
3.0 WETLAND DELINEATION RESULTS 4
3.1 Existing Conditions 4
3.2 Description of Wetlands 4
3.3 Land Uses and Habitat Values 6
3.4 Wetland Types and Buffers 6
4.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 8
4.1 Conclusions g
4.2 Recommendations 8
5.0 REFERENCES 10
6.0 FIGURES 12
Figure 1. Location Map 13
Figure 2. Vicinity Map 14
Figure 3. Wetland Delineation Map 15
7.0 TABLES 16
Table 1. Upland and Wetland Vegetation 17
Table 2. Site Soils 18
APPENDICES 19
Appendix A- Wetland Data Forms 20
WT813BRY.REP/1 12602gbs
2.0 METHODS
Wetlands were delineated in the field based on field methods recommended in the
Washington State Wetlands Identification and Delineation Manual (DOE 1997). Wetland
Rating was accomplished according to the Guidelines of the Washington State Wetlands
Rating System (Western Washington) (DOE 1993). Methods were essentially those
recommended by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers for Routine On-Site Field Method of
delineation of wetlands (U.S. ACOE 1989). Guidelines and requirements of the Jefferson
County Critical Area Code were applied as applicable (Unified Development Code, Section
3, Land Use Districts 2001).
Wetland plants were primarily identified in the field, with subsequent collection and keying
when necessary. Plants were identified using the following sources:
Cooke 1997
Guard 1995
Pojar and Mackinnon 1994
Hitchcock and Cronquist 1973
Lyons 1997
Taylor 1995
Keying of plants using magnifying lenses and dissecting microscope was used as necessary.
Determination of wetland indicator status utilized regional keys published by U.S.Fish and
Wildlife Service (U.S. FWS 1988).
Soils were determined through field examination. Soils were dug or augured to depths of
up to 18 inches using a wetland shovel, a 24" soil probe and a standard augur. Soil
consistency was determined by feeling for grain size and texture. Soil moisture was
determined at that time. In the event of saturated conditions in the hole, depth to standing
water was noted. Soil color was determined through comparison of field samples with
standard Munsell Color Charts (Munsell 1994). Soil was also examined for presence of
mottles, gley and other indicators of anaerobic soil oxidation.
Hydrologic conditions were determined through examination of topographic relief and
drainage patterns. Soil moistness was determined by hand as indicated above and in the
event of standing water, depth to standing water was noted.
Field surveys were carried out by Dr. Shea on October 31 and November 14, 2002. These
surveys included identification of plants, wetland habitats, soils and hydrology.
WT813BRY.REP/112602gbs 2
Wetlands were determined based on the Routine On-Site Field Method used by Washington
Department of Ecology and the U.S.Army Corps of Engineers. Wetlands were determined
by a combination of vegetation, soil and hydrology indicators. Specific transect and
quadrat points were sampled along apparent wetland edges. Various points were sampled
for vegetation, soil and hydrology in order to determine wetland boundaries. Appendix A
contains data forms for one typical sample point from each of the delineated wetlands.
Wetlands were staked in the field by 24 inch wooden stakes. Wetland boundaries in
forested areas were indicated by use of "Wetland Delineation Boundary" flagging tape
placed at appropriate points in trees and shrubs. All boundaries were staked and/or
flagged every 20-25 feet. Wetland buffer zones were determined based on field
measurements and regulatory requirements and were staked in the field and marked with
orange and black striped flagging every 40-50 feet.
WT813BRY.REP/112602gbs 3
Soils
Soils have been mapped in the area by the U.S. Soil Conservation Service (SCS 1975).
Soils at and near the Site have been mapped as the Triton-Hoodsport Association. These
are moderately well drained, very gravelly soils underlain by compact glacial till or basalt.
The specific soil types mapped at the Site are Belfast silt loam (Bg) on the eastern portion
of the property and Lummi silt loam (Lu) on the western portion.
Belfast Fine Sandy Loam (Bf) consists of well drained soils of flood plans. These
soils formed in alluvium, generally in coastal forests. These soils are associated with
Lummi and Swantown soils. The upper 4-8 inches is fine sandy loam. Below this
is a layer of sandy loam with gravels and cobbles throughout. This soil type appears
to be mixed in the field with Belfast Silt Loam (Bg) and the profiles range from fine
sandy loam to silt loam. These soils are somewhat acidic. The soil is well drained
with moderate permeability, slow runoff and little or no erosion hazard.
Lummi Silt Loam (Lu) is a nearly level soil found on river estuaries adjacent to tide-
flats and within 2-4 feet of the average high tide. The typical profile is 5-10 inches
of dark brown silt loam underlain by 8-17 inches of dark gray silt loam, becoming
very dark grey to olive silt loam to depths of sixty inches. This soil is poorly
drained with moderate permeability. Runoff is slow to ponded and erosion hazard
is slight except along stream channels.
The outer portion of the property is designated as Tidal Marsh (Td). These soils are
nearly level, extremely wet, salty or brackish areas within the overflow limits of the
high tide. Soil materials are deep deposits of heterogeneous river alluvium that are
continually saturated with salt water. The materials are clays and silty clays, gray
or greenish in color and mottled, with little or no upland soil formation.
On-site investigations by Westech Company indicate that the mapped soils correspond well
with soils found on the Site, although there are areas which appear to be characteristic of
Belfast silt loam (Bg) which is also found to the south of the property. Several perc holes
have been dug with a backhoe by a local contractor. JSF Engineering (John Fleming
Engineering of Port Angeles) is performing drainfield design based on results of these
tests).
Soils in the wetland have an organic surface layer, underlain by soils which correspond
well to the Lummi soil description, grading eastward to clay soils typical of tidal marsh.
There are several small channels in the wetland which operate as tidal sloughs, bringing
nutrients to the wetland plants. These channels can be expected to erode and change
location with time as is standard in wetlands of this type.
WT813BRY.REP!112602gbs 5
Hydrology
The Site hydrology in the wetland is controlled by tidal influence from Hood Canal.
Several sloughs enter the Site and one large slough is located at the north and west sides
•
of the Site. This slough brings brackish and salt water to the saltmarsh at high tides, and
fresher water from upland runoff during low tides. Saturation in the soils is fairly close
. , to the surface, generally at 12-24 inches depth in the wetlands and roughly 24-36 inches
in the nearby uplands depending on ground elevation and distance from Hood Canal.
Wetland soils were found to be moist at or near the surface, generally wet at depths of 6-
12 inches and sometimes saturated at depths below 12 inches, depending on location.
3.3 Land Uses and Habitat Values
Land uses at the Site include a saltmarsh wetland in nearly natural condition adjacent to
a property containing a former residence. The residential portion of the property has been
cleared and test pits have been dug in the upland area, which contains some shrubs and
native trees near the edge of the wetland and a few non-native trees in the upland.
The wetland extends outward from the upland-wetland transition for roughly 500 feet.
This is a large area which is attached to other natural marsh areas to the north and south.
Tidal sloughs cross these marshes, although some areas have been altered by ditching on
the east side of the property and to the north and south of the property.
These sloughs and the wetland are used by native fish species, and shellfish probably
including juvenile salmon, and several species of clams. The wetlands are utilized by
amphibians, birds and small mammals typical of such saltmarsh areas. Elk are known to
utilize the property during the spring and summer and early fall seasons. The wetland area
probably has a moderate to high habitat value based on the number and type of species
expected to be present and the general lack of disturbance.
The wetland area is mostly undisturbed on the property, however, culverting has occurred
over the tidal slough to the north and ditching occurred near the upper wetland boundary
at some past time.
3.4 Wetland Types and Buffers
The wetland found at the Site is part of a large wetland more than 20 acres in size which
occupies the Hood Canal shoreline near the mouth of the Dosewallips River. The area is
relatively undisturbed except for adjacent residential uses. This wetland therefore fits the
criteria for a Category I wetland according to the Jefferson County Unified Development
Code.
WT813BRY.REP/112602gbs 6
•
The wetland buffer for a Category I wetland is 150 feet (JCUDC 2001, Section 3.6.9). This
buffer has been flagged in the field with yellow-black striped flagging tape. Distance from
the wetland edge was measured vertically to determine buffer location. Measurements
were made from wetland delineation stakes, along the wetland edge, extending from the
southern property line of the Site, around three sides of the former residential area. The
buffer location is shown in Figure 3.
WT813BRY.REP/112602gbs 7
Replanting of all areas not covered with impermeable surface (driveway, house,
sidewalk etc.) should be accomplished upon completion of construction. Native
grasses native shrubs or other native plants should be established in all areas within
150 feet of the wetland immediately upon completion of construction. Any bare
areas which must be left for more than a few days during construction should be
covered with an erosion/siltation control barrier such as jute netting, or equivalent.
Implementation of these recommendations will, in our professional judgement result in no
significant environmental impacts to the wetland as a result of the proposed project.
WT813BRY.REP/112602gbs 9
5.0 REFERENCES
Allen, J.S. 1978. Survey of Portion of Government Lot 5, Section 35, T26N, R2W, W.M.
Submitted to Jefferson County. Port Townsend, Washington.
Cooke, S.S. 1997. A Field Guide to the Common Wetland Plants of Western Washington
and Northwestern Oregon. Seattle Audubon Society. Seattle, Washington.
Guard, J. 1995. Wetland Plants of Washington and Oregon. Lone Pine Publishing.
Renton, Washington.
Hitchcock, C.L.and A. Cronquist. 1973. Flora of the Pacific Northwest. University of
Washington Press. Seattle, Washington.
Jefferson County. 2001. Jefferson County Unified Development Code . Section 3, Land
Use Districts, Subsection 3.6 -Wetlands. Department of Community Development.
Port Townsend, Washington.
Lyons, C.P. 1997. Wildflowers of Washington. Lone Pine Publishing. Renton,
Washington.
Munsell Color. 1994. Mansell Soil Color Charts. GretagMacbeth. New Windsor, New
York.
Pojar, J. and A. MacKinnon. 1994. Plants of the Pacific Northwest Coast. Lone Pine
Publishing Company. Redmond, Washington.
Taylor, R. 1995. Northwest Weeds. Mountain Press Publishing Company. Missoula
Montana.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE). 1989. Federal Manual for Identifying and
Delineating Jurisdictional Wetlands. U.S.Government Printing Office. Washington,
D.C.
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS). 1988. National List of Species that Occur in
Wetlands; Region 9 (and Supplement). Biological Report 88(26.9). Portland,
Oregon.
U.S.Geological Survey. 1985. Quadrangle Map of Brinnon, Washington. 1:24,000 Scale.
Published 1953, Photorevised 1985. Boulder, Colorado.
WT813BRY.REP/112602gbs 10
U.S. Soil Conservation Service (SCS). 1975. Soil Survey of Jefferson County Area.
Washington. U.S. Department of Agriculture. Washington, D.C.
Washington Department of Ecology (WDOE). 1993. Washington State Wetlands Rating
System: Western Washington. Second Edition. Publication # 93-74. Olympia,
Washington.
Washington Department of Ecology (WDOE). 1997. Washington State Wetlands
Identification and Delineation Manual. Publication #96-94. Olympia, Washington.
WT813BRY.REP/112602gbs 11
6.0 FIGURES
WT813BRY.REP/112602gbs 12
r- \
NATIONAL S ,
Jack (r 1 :- ..
/ Jastuox
.
ii
-0
Mr.TURNER ::� ,44
3I f _, Iw'awaP
1
_ (Right r iart
`pagE� Ceud'
9 Tun er Cri ....,....„ '',?';',:'-;-''''''.- ::'
f c
FOREST
—'- - - GREEN HILL ,,. 'h
i x»o i if
DOSEWALLIP$ 7 `. :s SY�
30• 29 • j 1 ' Y
•
Q4
��
'�4 ...__-.______ ..... ? h E .,yet - a
Q
- BD
P ' °y
34}.Jae g�4` Brinson a:.,=P•:,: :
3' 3� j is��'{3 '..0 as r '<
. :*,:,:Z!,:•:'.:::..,.":„.
'';'
U 4
n4e M \.
.. MATNCWWS
DOSOWa//tpS I f
' SUM Park .. ;
1 x
' "}Sl V'
T
OLYMPIC as
as-*4 wok '';
s �
{ c
-74
NATIONAL ,. -. .- \ /1, ,-_ a . '.` l kr
il"p Gf� 16 n eye— �fft "3
', ral_a..-,,,,,,-,,4,,.:,,,:c_,,.
FOREST 1 nk
l.ii,r' _( f 2n 1., s, W' a,a�1
3w �':
w.
t.oA `1&'. TES ;
r 4Rerr_. !9 TOT `t _� „n,s'` ;x'.
, _
Figure 1. Location Map
Westech Company, 2002
•
•
1 ,\\\�� *1\`= :\�� ;li, '' `_�`LL \` \\\;\', , ^1.�f I Greek
_._�__s re
r, �f /
• C.
s.
1 f.,/,
....;_::.- .,,,,,„•-•_-_-•,.......„.....\--‘-, . ,...., a;, \•\,. . N.,, \\:).'••••\)•,,, I.,1 il,),!!.!..ts,381:, I . 5;1/ „,,,,...9 .? I ),r: ///i i"....; 'c../. `.., l'.•
-------ze '''''' '''--: -7' i al‘‘'''X \\„._ i ir/y/filt.i:, -•'-:_. --- //9)) di y ,/..oiesii) : :. • /
.11, 10,, ,•,...N.__ ,r / i,)' r,yi t'"',./i ! :.;, : ; !,:, . -,c
/ ji I/ i.1 1 i• •(. .: ; ' -ri
rJ� !11—r r 2$` /- t\ `^----•. �,•oo� / /// .i� ' . Rock
•�^ �' - � \\\�; /� 9 'I ern
5007
--tee \ „ • t 35
\ » ' \` •( • =4..__. ;f. roject Site
\3N. , \ I lJ - <•`•• ;. 'Brirnon'
I_!` ,, ' •gs•• \ ' \�:' : B.'!21 -SYiovash Pt
‘‘..\\ -\
l •.� i b03EWALLIPS
i MIL a
4) 4. ,. • •• -- \ , --. \ : ' . ."-
OF •-!;!"', _—, '"`' -• ` \- .,` r"� `_.eas i'1 '' tt ;t_:%;>' n
1. •:-.......I.*:....,,F!"!„...i'......._... . .-....--------)'—/... 1 el-t..1 1....: f.:::.••?'-'/P...73 S I CI: If I 1i r../I—7.../"•-•-• •09—/(.1—,•2 i.711!! :7;,•:.::?' :
/,/
ji
g. ; ' � �J (�._ _, `ter °. ..
y '\ �Jf Jar, a
...;,,,....,,_,.../.,.....,...„....,72..
.... .
,. ,.\......_:.:_r,,......_,, s.....„_.:__„, /, . \.,,, ..., ...,,,... .
,„.. , e
„._.:,_. • ,,,,,,y)) ,,
/ ri; .•
____. •-„.._,„_;-..,,,,-;---,2:::__,:i5e,_ ,
Figure 2. Vicinity Map
Westech Company, 2002
7.0 TABLES
WT813BRY.REP/112602gbs 16
TABLE 1. UPLAND AND WETLAND VEGETATION**
Common Name Scientific Name Indicator *
UPLAND AREA
bluegrass Poa pratensis FAC
ryegrass Lolium perenne FACU
plantain Plantago major FACU+
dandilion Taraxacum officinale UPL
red clover Trifolium pratense FACU
white clover Trifolium repens FAC
wood rose Rosa gymnocarpa FACU
dovefoot geranium Geranium molle UPL
western red cedar Thuja plicata FAC
holly Ilex aquifolium FACU
blackberry Rubus procerus FACU
swordfern Polystichum munitum FACU
WETLAND AREA
soft rush Juncus effusus FACW
seaside plantain Plantago maritima FACW+
pickleweed Salicornia pacifica OBL
seaside arrowgrass Triglochin maritima OBL
saltgrass Distichlis spicata FAC+
spearscale Atriplex patula FACW
short-awn foxtail Alopecurus aequalis OBL
Douglas aster Aster subspicatus FACW
* Indicators are FACU=facultative upland plants (prefer upland soils), FAC=facultative
plants (may be upland or wetland), FACW=facultative wetland plants (prefer wetland
soils and hydrology), OBL=obligate wetland plants, require wetland conditions.
** The Site also contained a number of ornamental trees including apple trees and eastern
maple trees. Lombardy poplars occupy an area just off-site to the south.
WT813BRY.REP/112602gbs 17
•
TABLE 2. SITE SOILS
Location Soil Texture and Color Depth (in.) C/V**
SV-1 (wetland) dark brown clay 0-6" 3/1
silty clay (dark brown)* 6-12" 3/2
clay (dark grown)* 12-18" 3/2
clay/ w/ mottles 18"+ 3/1
Standing water 20"
SV-2 (upland) silt loam (gray brown) 0-6" 4/2
silt (med. brown) 6-12" 3/2
silty clay (lt. brown) 12-18" 4/3
clay (brown) 18"+ 3/2
damp soil at 12 - 18"
* mottles present at moderate density or greater
** C/V =Chroma Value as given by Munsell Soil Color Charts, all values from 10YR chart.
WT813BRY.REP/112602gbs 18
APPENDICES
WT813BRY.REP/112602gbs 19
DATA FORM 1
Routine Wetland Determination
(WA State Wetland Delineation Manual or
1 1987 Corps Wetland Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: ov.,err 1 �•- ' d o-2. `)5.� 'a �J Date: pl,y/oz-
Applicant/owner: / L,^,s C.r.-u-� .g,,. County: ,S ,C,„_e_j.
State: wAt
Investigator(s): 17 r. 6- S/T/R: i 7-z6 QZ Lv
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? yes Community ID:
Is the site significantly disturbed(atypical situation)? AV no Transect ID: fc- i
Is the area a potential Problem Area? yes CD Plot ID: 5 v— 1
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
, 645i- -
(j. `-;�•i,f,,e �pr�;s� � (�f_-•e
e 7 4(c•
Leef 4(<5 Zi
HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION INDICATORS:
%of dominants OBL, FACW, &FAC: 4)
Check all indicators that apply &explain below:
Regional knowledge of plant communities V Wetland plant list(nat'l or regional) OTHER
Physiological or reproductive adaptations Morphological adaptations
Technical Literature ✓ Wetland Plant Data Base
Hydrophytic vegetation present? e no
Rationale for decision/Remarks: d
- HYDROLOGY
Is it the growing season? yes Go; Water Marks: yes no Sediment Deposits: yes no
Based on: Drift Lines: yes no _Drainage Patterns: yes no
Dept. of inundation: Zc3 I.inches Oxidized Root(live roots) Local Soil Survey: yes no
Channels<12 in.yes no
Depth to free water in pit: "inches FAC Neutral: yes no Water-stained
Leaves: yes no
Depth to saturated soil: 1Z-i "inches
Check all that apply &explain below: Other:
Stream,Lake or gage data:
Aerial photographs: Other:
( Wetland hydrology present? *VP no
• Rationale for decision/Remarks: s ��., � L (�,, r-2.,o`�" s��-_
----"Nlpr\<;,.
OILS
Map Unit Name �.y.,,s,,,. ,' t. -r;
` > M,4..�j4,1, Drainage Class_
(Series &Phase)
Taxonomy (subgroup) �:(y�l�a.{,�, Field observations confirm ► No
mapped type?
Profile Description
Depth Horizon Matrix color Mottle colors Mottle abundance Texture, concretions,(inches) (Munsell (Munsell size&contrast • structure,etc. Drawing of soil
moist) moist) profile
�� (match descrintionl
v-6 A "�- .�/i
bra..� •
�;r
64.'e IA- ., .,.../,........
..c,_IL " ,.....ie b,...._44.,,. .,.....-6,
ii,,e,,,..s....„.
s ---
4] (47
1.�14 ate,. '
I / T J.
k+sv.� ___. �_ _
I
•
I
IHydric Soil Indicators: (check all that apply)
I.
Histosol
Histic Epipedon Concretions
Sulfidic Odor High Organic Content in Surface Layer of Sandy Soils 4
I Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils I Aquic Moisture Regime ,./ Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
,/ Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
✓ Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors
Other(explain in remarks)I Hydric soils present?
no
Rationale for decision/Remarks: z _-4e-
Vetland Determination (circle)
-Iydrophytic vegetation present? CP no
[ydric soils present? ikl no Is the sampling hydrology P n point yes no
Wetland h
Y gy present? eJ no within a wetland?
"ationale/Remarks:
NOTES:
DATA FORM 1
Routine Wetland Determination
(WA State Wetland Delineation Manual or
1987 Corps Wetland Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: ►_� , ;x1 ��A 6e7:. Date:
Applicant/owner: � -br�ay �...�,. • County:
State: w.4
Investigator(s): , S/T/R: �-t �2.6.l L1/
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? yes no Community ID: Lam_!Q
Is the site significantly disturbed(atypical situation)? no Transect ID: -
Is the area a potential Problem Area? yes Plot ID: S,._-
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
PA e-
d N
f
g9=Gt. N w z Ni`" I'' ' i tt
�!i. >! ,✓1-. 1"__X'�s�-�� /-I-�' /Ll L?_-
HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION INDICATORS:
%of dominants OBL,FACW, &FAC: i -��
Check all indicators that apply &explain below:
Regional knowledge of plant communities - Wetland plant list(nat'l or regional) OTHER
Physiological or reproductive adaptations Morphological adaptations
Technical Literature f Wetland Plant Data Base
Hydrophytic vegetation present? yes no
Rationale for decision/Remarks: la - 47 C A
-
• HYDROLOGY
Is it the growing season? yes ( )Water Marks: yes Sediment Deposits: yes
Based on: Drift Lines: yes no Drainage Patterns: yes Coj
Dept. of inundation: inches Oxidized Root(live roots) Local Soil Survey: j no
Channels<12 in.yes CE75
Depth to free water in pit: — inches FAC Neutral: yes rCJ Water-stained
.�-oT�..-,►� — %C o�`� Leaves: yes io
Depth to saturated soil: inches 3u
Check all that apply &explain below: Other:
Stream,Lake or gage data:
Aerial photographs: Other:
Wetland hydrology present? yes
Rationale for decision/Remarks: &ale
a�f - --,-- '
SOILS
Map Unit Name d-E xt-
(Series & Phase) Drainage Class
Taxonom (subgroup) F Field observations confirm es No
P) ,'Q�.to,.,...., mapped type?
Profile Description
Depth Horizon Matrix color Mottle colors Mottle abundance Texture, concretions, Drawing of soil
(inches) (Munsell (MunselI size&contrast structure, etc.
moist) moist) profile
~ - (match description)
t �'4' ram- '`_
d-6
6` Z.r1 [l 11�r�cr._ —^ li`� G3r�,lit
6 _ z tY
I � i
IHydric Soil Indicators: (check all that apply)l I
Histosol Concretions
Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer of Sandy Soils 141
ISulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Aquic Moisture Regime Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
V Gleyed or Low-Chroma ColorsS Other(explain in remarks)
- I Hydric soils present? yes (
Rationale for decision/Remarks: `=�
.3<zit- e � r* _ . zlG �rz-
I -1zo rt -Kj
Wetland Determination (circle)
"Iydrophytic vegetation present?Iydric soils present?
yes
yes Is the sampling point yes no Wetland hydrology present? yes �rra� within a wetland?
^.ationaleJRemarks:
(` `ram' i _r`t4 -�-
NOTES:
ill?
SEP/ 77J7
ECEBVE
Construction Storm Water Pollution Protection Plan
Keith and Tammy Berry Residence Case#MLA 03 00467 DEPT OF COMMUNfTI pEV OpMENT
Element 1
The clearing limits will be marked with yellow flags as indicated on the storm water site
plan.
Element 2
The construction access IQ the existing gravel driveway as shown on the storm water plan.
Element 3
Flow rates will be controlled during construction utilizing the permanent infiltration area
to the north of the home site protected by filter fabric fencing on clearing limit line as
shown on the storm water site plan.
Element 4
Storm water run off during construction will flow northerly through the filter fabric
fencing onto the permanent infiltration area as shown on the storm water site plan.
Element 5
Soil stock piles from construction will be stabilized from erosive forces using plastic
sheeting and straw where necessary.
Element 6
Subject property has a minimal '/2 degree slope to the north northwest. Erosion will be
minimized mostly by maintenance of the grass.
Element 7
Storm drain inlets will be filtered using straw bales where necessary to filter and remove
sediments.
Element 8
On site temporary conveyance channels will be stabilized to prevent erosion.
Element 9
Any potential pollution will be handled in a manner that will not cause contamination of
storm water.
Element 10
De-watering flow control will be primarily infiltration on site such that flows will not
cause erosion or flooding of receiving waters.
Element 11 APPROVED
Temporary&permanent erosion& sediment control BMP's will&TQRWTER PLAN
Element 12
The project will be managed by Keith and Tammy Berry, oners. SEP 3 0 21103
*
JEFFERSON COUNTY
DEPT.OF COM 1 DE ELOPM• T
SIGNATURE:
� i
10/02/2003 08:36 FAX 3603840973 11002
Oct 02 03 OG:28a Craig•nfield 509-49 3133 P- 2
5070 Pacific Highway
.. Ferndale,Washington 9B248
Civil. Structural and Foundation Engineering
•
fir. I I i -•
C}ctober 1,2003 C L' b,1� L� _I " `,` I
\\
Linwood Homes ��
8250 River Road �, -i OCT 2 2003 ,i�
Delta,B.C. V4G 1B5 I
COUNTY
ON C
: Berry Residence DEPT. OF JEFFERS EFFERS COMMUNITYDEVELOPMENT
30365 Highway 101
Brinnon, WA
To Wham It May Concern:
' It has been brought to the attention of Pinner Engineering, Inc.this structure is
•
being built in a flood plain_The contractor for the project has added floodgate panels in
d
It has
the foundigoIn�to been
that Pinner
Engineer review the locations of the panels for any struc asked
ral issues.
,
Upon review, it is found the location of the floodgates does not affect the lateral
strength of the foundation.It is required that a minimum of a(3)2x10 hcader/rirnjoist
should be present over the openings.This will carry the bearing load over and transfer the
lateral force across the openings.
If you have any questions regarding this letter,please feel free to call.
Sincerely,
t
Craig Penfield " 1:77 /',� 1
Project Engineer ` `', =
it•A-,.., ' r.7 ,,,
4 ;1L 0 s .I'y
' ,s, �GrszS - ,&}`;,^
,, SJONAL .K
EXPIRES 2-13-04 1
OCT - 1 2001
Phone:360-384-S285 Fax 360-384-0973 EQUINEMOM,=AOL-COM
10/02/2003 08:37 FAX 3603840973 12003
nct 02 03 O6:23a Craig of telct 50S-4903133 P- 3
Typical Headers-Over Flood Openings Pagel
Pinner Engineering , _
Project 21767 06:16:33 10/02/03
Job: Berry Residence,30365-Hwy 101, Brinnon,WA Designed by:CAP
Client Linwood Homes-- - -- - Checked by: -_
Input Data
. Check of(3)2x10 SPF No.1/No.2- User Dimensional+t cars None
Left Cantilever;None Mni Spam rstir
Right Check for repptifee use? Na Tributary Width:t7 Slopec 0
Deed Load:{1 lost Live Loeb:0 psf 5now Load: a
• EU1gN_LL Deflection:L/360 Allow.IL Deflection:L240 DOL:1.150
(3 in ) F 875 psi
ED;1 d00000 psi F._70 psi e:
User Defined Loads
i . Load Gazse [Y,ad Dlstance(s)to Load
Load at Load at
Start End
Smart Length ft Of Of
plaad Uniform 0' 56" 142-5
snow Condition 1 Unifarn 0' 56" 28S
Dead Uni(utm cr 5'6' 1125
Floor Lire Uniform 0' Sr 300
Design Checks
Reaction Bendlne-X Shear LL OWL Ti.Daft.
in In
Marc ValUe to2705.78 803.033 69_018 -0.0534 -0_0779
Altowdble 5737.5 1106.88 80.5 02167 0.325
Si3� �
47 I I 23 tie
o Of Mom, �
Location CT 9'2 3132" 5'5-314 31-11116' 3'2-11/11r
Reactions and Bearing
Support Location Mir_Beating Reaction
•
ft in lb •
0• 1.5 2705_78 -
6-6" 1.5 1995.01 ''-' D 1 'O K'''.i c__ 1
r
Self-weight of member is included. 4
Member has an act„a YHua►rable ratio in scan 1 of ti61%. 1
Design is gcHernetl by shear fiAFv. ,\1 OCT - 2 2003
Governing load combination is [ Floor Levt9now Condition 1. 1
Maximum hanger forces 2705.78 lb(Left)and 1995.01 lb(Right).
l JEFF RSON COUNTY
DEPT. OF COMMUNITY OEVEI�OPY:NT
Program Vcsswn 82-3/13/20W •
• •
to
u
Q tou u
u_
4211 Ws-r TL-
F ail, <16)1/4
7
L/0
i 1-;
1 a
TYP.PERIMETER FOUNDATION: 1
ION. 1 7 _ i
—I I
4 8" CONCRETE WALL I Y
18"x8" CONCRETE FOOTING I o l-
'-
^ (SEE DETAIL 'G' SI-IT. 7) I I I a- u
W rx° U
wN I N -
\FAdE -
- o I- 1 _I > a r
�Z VI r-
oc
71)
cm N TYP.INTERIOR SUPPORT(U.N.0): Q I A l I
§'") 6x6 POST 1 I ,
° W 8"x8" CONCRETE PIER EXPANDIE FOOTING FTG-02: TJI FL
N
r3o'xxIo' CONC. FOOTING I „ " „
f1NG: WITH 3 ROWS 10M (#4) 3q x3q xl2 CONC. FTG. �Q I (SIZE
NC. FTG. ` REBAR EACH WAY 1 WITH 4 ROWS I5M ( 5)o f
�5M (#5) J a . L (SEE DETAIL 'H' SHT. 7) D REBAR EACH WAY ( \FA
AY 7 130"x30"x10"
— — BEAM , 141_0"" L
1 r r b POCKET
-
' 4 xid NA -LAM4BEAM 4 2c10 NAIL-LAM L E.AM 4- c10 , ,IL-LAM BEAM 4-2x10 NAIL-LAM BEA i, I
Fes-- = - 1_ - — � _
nys
wt.
L ° \F._r-BEAM KET J L -.1 �J FACEai ,TLIL
(SEE CET. 'J' SI-IT. 7) \ I 1
° n I I L/O
b-0 bi i-0 6'-0" 6 0'- " '-
^ , - I� I b l
u I � °4 I DROP I
wN
- zpi 1112" eT
W
caci
CRAWL SPACE -3 V 1
F VENT 1:150 I v 1oJ,LTJI FL(
o = o (SIZE
�i, TYP.CONCRETE SLAB(N.I.C.) I (TNIS
N z 2" CONC. SKIM COAT OR N I I BEAM F
s. 6 a APPROVED GROUND COVER of I
> 6 MIL POLY (SEE D1
N m I
4. 6" COMPACTED FILL o I
mow .
awl10
e
' I CRAWI
I I VEN'
-I L _
J
1' 14 /x10 NAIL-LAM :EAM 4-2 10 NAIL-LAM BEAD r ,
• C - - " `- �� - - L — — Jlic BEAM POCKET I
Q5 ", . ' /\ rt rACE" (SEE DET. 'J'
4, L - - J "t- SHT. 7)
-� 6'-0" 6'-0" ti 7'-q" 7'-q"
DROP N.L. BEAM r,,
I 12" @ THIS POINT -
In a_
w
wi H11� TJI FLOOR JOISTS 11%" DEEP I-- CA
o
(SIZE 4 SPACING TO MFR. SPECS.)
(THIS AREA TO BE SUNKEN 12") t
e--- v
I I I • FACE o
C)i I IIl ` mom (
,a- J _ S<. a
It
Li_ W-_ N
9 LT) O
FiI I I �- I`.,I-
tiI I BEAM POCKET I w-: <
;i I (SEE DET. 'J' BHT. 7) 1 c6.:,..,__,
j a
t t- -1 DROP FDN WALL „ �C2zS P'f7LEDGER ..,---j - - - J
12" i THIS POINT
4_� I 4 2x6 CEDAR DECKIN
I - I C p
/ J I 6 8 LL �9 1_; u
0
/ atria
BEAM POCKET / / % ' r'
(SEE DET. ,P/ ' • % _ _
•
—S �Y / PM -2x10 P_T. NAIL'LAM BEAM
°// -ro 2x6 CEDAR DECKING NA\\=i� J L
/__ _ J \i2 ,. _ — ,
\0P., NAjj/ / d ',
• A-T
_ J q-5 _ 4PE7QtNEr g?Ceca4
gc:;)
• 5'-2%q" 10'- q'
i / /
I2'-0" / 15'-6' 0"
/
0 ' o �'ev
a ii 1.
XN SO 0 co -'O m
orw a 00 w --'� �I XN to ;7 O
—o '*1 N U ti
G. WO,' 13 rn m'U y =QUO O ��O a O a _ cr
u o-•(N� n, o''a o 3x N .., V. I 6) 3 S N o Q.
N �(� O 4 r N -I D () ?� .. CDG X N
•
3:inA • . D w
D y m C v
4.
--I o 0 =3 ?„ .o a ,<1
o �-%67 m Ny 2 .Je.
O CDn • GI
Vf 0 ��
xi Ul
1
M
\ TAX 2 724 S.R
.-tea 2.,0 0. 101
ao �\gxN 1
V p 3u r
V '.0 N ,D m
N --1
V CA--I Q�Oi `�`,_ ` O O D p�0
NDOO T " kel
X U4
Q N U U O t-CO
fie: N CA
O v y e r`'
W Usk et, 17 /A k I i
^ T
N
=l I • :
t�7.t' m 2 I C' ��
e-Dr m r I
2 r
;Y /fir ,,
r� /o it:,
/— ano
s
o
�� i / „
` + tl
/ 1
a>O / -, --IX N /
C NU !- D 9O �• ?i.+ / 4.-
� XXNnOc. j'.--
N h t.-- •O c`,1rntU., co U CD--I ^
`--^O XN
N W G y N L
•. • CO N Xm0 `
�F c •
ZO
7-, cn 0
o<,,
•D G •
m 1-
..
•
. N .
et,
•
•
n .
0
.a
y
N
O
O
N